We shouldn't be using that shit at all. Contrary to what big agribusiness preaches, it is possible to grow food without chemical fertilizers or -icides.
Bingo. This is why we fail. We train people and give them the idea that technology is static and their skill will last them a lifetime. We should have subsidized programs in place to retrain every 10 years so that our workforce can adapt to emerging technology.
The problem is they could post something, say "Look you're a terrorist" and send you back to your originating country. By the time you've figured it all out, you're 3000 miles away in a foreign land and nothing you can do. This is RIPE for abuse and I can't believe any court would find this legal.
Well, eat whatever you want, but colon cancer is the 3rd most prevalent cancer in America and can go undetected for a long time, easily into stage 3 or 4. Don't say I didn't warn you.
It's not difficult at all. You just push nodes into a queue instead of using the system stack. Every iteration on the queue processes that set and possibly adds more nodes to the queue. Rinse and repeat. Recursion is a terrible solution to that problem because you've just limited the size of the trees that you can process.
Recursion is undesirable because it doesn't scale - you run out of stack pretty quickly. There isn't really ever any need for recursion anyway as there's nothing you can do recursively that you can't do non-recursively.
Exactly. To look at an extreme differential, take those uncontacted tribes in the Amazon. They've isolated themselves and live a nice self-sustaining existence, but are now basically at our mercy.
We should also be subsidizing training and education to improve our domestic workforce. We're not going to suddenly wake up one day and have enough workers by luck, we need to be creating them.
Sorry, I didn't intend it as a flame. If you need a big truck, ok, but there's tons of people who buy giant trucks just for fashion. Those are the people I was talking about -- the people who could easily live without one.
Yeah, destruction. What, you think we're improving the planet?
We almost killed the ozone layer, we've driven countless species to extinction, we're destroying the rainforests, the oceans have literally 50% of the fish they did since the 1970's, we pollute the air, we pollute the water, we pollute the soil, we're heating the planet and fucking up countless ecosystems, etc.. etc..
You don't think that's destruction of our habitat?
We shouldn't be using that shit at all. Contrary to what big agribusiness preaches, it is possible to grow food without chemical fertilizers or -icides.
It only helps America if you define America as the capitalist exploitation machine.
Another reason for UBI.
Nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Probably not if those other passengers are brown.
Bingo. This is why we fail. We train people and give them the idea that technology is static and their skill will last them a lifetime. We should have subsidized programs in place to retrain every 10 years so that our workforce can adapt to emerging technology.
Reason #238 why this is a stupid and terrible idea.
The problem is they could post something, say "Look you're a terrorist" and send you back to your originating country. By the time you've figured it all out, you're 3000 miles away in a foreign land and nothing you can do. This is RIPE for abuse and I can't believe any court would find this legal.
Yeah, just like how there's no automobile jobs now that everyone has a car.
Well, eat whatever you want, but colon cancer is the 3rd most prevalent cancer in America and can go undetected for a long time, easily into stage 3 or 4. Don't say I didn't warn you.
That's fine if it suits your needs, but to write robust and reusable code you avoid imposing limits like that if possible. Remember Y2K?
Or just don't use recursion
Just have a good exit criteria to avoid too deep recursions
You've just crippled your processing ability.
or you've made very, VERY large data structures
Why do you think that's such an anomaly?
It's not difficult at all. You just push nodes into a queue instead of using the system stack. Every iteration on the queue processes that set and possibly adds more nodes to the queue. Rinse and repeat. Recursion is a terrible solution to that problem because you've just limited the size of the trees that you can process.
And don't think that a vegan or vegetarian diet does ANYTHING for you. It doesn't.
I guess all those dummies that study nutrition don't know as much as you.
Meat isn't bad for you, in any way shape or form.
Except there's a strong link between red and smoked meats and increased chance of colorectal cancer.
Recursion is undesirable because it doesn't scale - you run out of stack pretty quickly. There isn't really ever any need for recursion anyway as there's nothing you can do recursively that you can't do non-recursively.
And then there's us with our orange shithead at the helm ramping back up on burning coal and oil, for no other reason except greed.
Exactly. To look at an extreme differential, take those uncontacted tribes in the Amazon. They've isolated themselves and live a nice self-sustaining existence, but are now basically at our mercy.
I worked that out when he announced he was running.
We should also be subsidizing training and education to improve our domestic workforce. We're not going to suddenly wake up one day and have enough workers by luck, we need to be creating them.
Somehow I don't see Trump supporting that...
Sorry, I didn't intend it as a flame. If you need a big truck, ok, but there's tons of people who buy giant trucks just for fashion. Those are the people I was talking about -- the people who could easily live without one.
Yeah, destruction. What, you think we're improving the planet?
We almost killed the ozone layer, we've driven countless species to extinction, we're destroying the rainforests, the oceans have literally 50% of the fish they did since the 1970's, we pollute the air, we pollute the water, we pollute the soil, we're heating the planet and fucking up countless ecosystems, etc.. etc..
You don't think that's destruction of our habitat?