Hey, it's called quake for a reason. It isn't that this game doesn't have tactics, it may be your lack of skill and experience making you fail to notice them. Of course, reflexes and muscle memory is more important, but so is knowledge of the map and ability to time weapons and predict respawns.
a human player uses his abilities the best he can. turns out that monte carlo does the same for a computer. how's that bad, or cheap? in the end, every computation boils down to some bit crunching, that's like saying that using a calculator to do your taxes is 'a cheap percents and additions trick.'
oh btw, don't ever try playing poker, since that's clearly a cheap probability game.
Depends on the project, as usual, but IMHO yes, Django is worth a try. I haven't used Zend though, so YMMV (particularly, I don't know what features you may expect from a framework.)
Re:Never heard of Django before, now it's everwher
on
Practical Django Projects
·
· Score: 2, Informative
there are tools like pychecker, they help quite a bit. junit is right there in the standard library of python, see docs for the unittest module; there's also the doctest module for simple cases.
except that recent blizzard vs. glider case was actually won by blizzard, who state that having an unauthorized, modified copy of the game in RAM is a breach of contract...
IME usually it's flash. install flashblock or noscript and enable only those flash movies you really want to see - haven't seen ff3 crash since I started doing that.
Not entirely true. Keys generated before the patch made it to the repos are safe - and I think quite a lot of debian boxes are old enough (I know I've got one.) There's a link in the advisory to a tool that checks if the keys are vulnerable.
This doesn't change the fact that this is a really serious fuckup. Debian lost quite some credibility in my eyes.
I run the IT systems for my small software company and frankly Subversion is a great tool for the job. I don't *want* a distributed VC system because I don't want the hassle of trying to ensure that everyone's modifications to the code tree are backed up correctly and stored safely somewhere. I want it in a central spot I can back up and manage without my employees having to worry about it. Clearly you have no idea how DVCSes work. Every employee has his own backup and you still can tell them (or force them) to push changes to a blessed server (which can be called central, but this isn't a _technical_ thing anymore), copy of which you can then safely stash away.
There are two things a DVCS can't do that a CVCS can:
1. Delete something from global history (just can't be done, because everyone has his own backup)
2. Partial checkouts (if you've got a monolithic repository instead of per-project.)
Everything else works perfectly fine and/or better.
there's a chance that after such a domain expires, it won't be taken by a parked ad display, as is the case with expired.coms. this is one reason I actually like the idea of higher prices.
Slashdot Mirror
Hey, it's called quake for a reason. It isn't that this game doesn't have tactics, it may be your lack of skill and experience making you fail to notice them. Of course, reflexes and muscle memory is more important, but so is knowledge of the map and ability to time weapons and predict respawns.
no wonder; it's CVS, after all. ;p
Cool and all, but I can't see what's your point TBH. There isn't any thought behind how the universe works, either. It doesn't care and works anyway.
a human player uses his abilities the best he can. turns out that monte carlo does the same for a computer. how's that bad, or cheap? in the end, every computation boils down to some bit crunching, that's like saying that using a calculator to do your taxes is 'a cheap percents and additions trick.'
oh btw, don't ever try playing poker, since that's clearly a cheap probability game.
hello and welcome to slashdot, mr. clueless.
I think he's talking about what hypervisors do in virtualized environments with other instructions, but don't know any details about this.
so the users can organize stuff by themselves if they wish?
Depends on the project, as usual, but IMHO yes, Django is worth a try. I haven't used Zend though, so YMMV (particularly, I don't know what features you may expect from a framework.)
there are tools like pychecker, they help quite a bit. junit is right there in the standard library of python, see docs for the unittest module; there's also the doctest module for simple cases.
except that recent blizzard vs. glider case was actually won by blizzard, who state that having an unauthorized, modified copy of the game in RAM is a breach of contract...
IME usually it's flash. install flashblock or noscript and enable only those flash movies you really want to see - haven't seen ff3 crash since I started doing that.
FF3 has never crashed for me since I installed noscript. I selectively allow only flash content that I want to watch.
you've missed the crucial "through the city" part.
TFA states that MediaDefender has 9Gpbs pipes. Massive enough if you ask me.
Not entirely true. Keys generated before the patch made it to the repos are safe - and I think quite a lot of debian boxes are old enough (I know I've got one.) There's a link in the advisory to a tool that checks if the keys are vulnerable.
This doesn't change the fact that this is a really serious fuckup. Debian lost quite some credibility in my eyes.
There are two things a DVCS can't do that a CVCS can:
1. Delete something from global history (just can't be done, because everyone has his own backup)
2. Partial checkouts (if you've got a monolithic repository instead of per-project.)
Everything else works perfectly fine and/or better.
link here: doom4 screenshot.
Gee, sounds to me like UAC is working exactly the way it should!
Something from MS working like it should... sounds strange, isn't it? And what's more - Slashdot agrees that it works!a programmer is bitter that an OS forced him to separate privileged code from unprivileged. news at 11.
it's one of those ???-Profit! cases.
802.3ad
I believe you managed to misspell "much" as "even".
naaah, they've got a beowulf cluster of pentiums.
there's a chance that after such a domain expires, it won't be taken by a parked ad display, as is the case with expired .coms. this is one reason I actually like the idea of higher prices.