No, it requires parents to understand every game they are buying. They don't need to know every game out there - just the ones that they're willing to buy and hand to their children....
Agreed 100%. Statistically speaking, the best approach is to only scan men, as the vast majority of (current) terrorists are male, and the available pool of potential future women recruits is (currently) smaller.
Is it too crazy to expect that sampling for security should match the actual observed distribution (with a uniform prior)?
Is this a bad thing? I mean, romanticize how you will, but is it really better to put human (or even robot) footprints on Mars than to push the telescope programs? 225,000,000 km or 2.25 x 10^20 km - we can't live there (yet).
Paying twice as much now and the same later sounds better than normal now and 10x later.
You are going to be one of the few not screwed when the dinosaurs start running out. And they'll be closing those dirty plants down the way when coal is more expensive than gold. Isn't this still a good outcome long-term, even if it costs now?
Better to get them with the knife, in CoD. Shotguns will paint you on enemy radar, besides being more effective at clue-ing in anyone nearby that there is trouble lurking around.
The distribution of a single sample is not statistically required to reflect the full distribution; the probability of that particular sample goes down, but never equals zero. This is why anecdotes get so much distrust.
That said, I currently have an "additional screening" rate of greater than 90% in the US, while my wife is never selected. I have to wonder if things would be different, were there more prominent female terrorists.
Their research arm is still doing quite well. If they want to sell, of course, local co-giants Xerox and Bausch + Lomb may be interested in snapping up those top optics and computer vision scientists....
I was a summer intern at KRL (Kodak Research Labs), working on digital image processing, when the whole printer thing took off, and it was painfully obvious to us that it was a terrible move. Putting Bill Lloyd (formerly head of inkjet work) in place as CTO seemed to cement things in place.
Who prints anything at home these days, anyway? Especially photos....
You clearly do not live in New York. New York State Consolidated Laws-Judiciary Law Article 16 521 states that all employers of 10+ employees must pay for full employee wages, at least for the first three days of service (with the state picking up the tab thereafter).
Shahidka are a vast minority of modern-day terrorists. That, plus there have been no reports or confirmed shahidka terrorist activities in the USA.
No, it requires parents to understand every game they are buying. They don't need to know every game out there - just the ones that they're willing to buy and hand to their children....
Agreed 100%. Statistically speaking, the best approach is to only scan men, as the vast majority of (current) terrorists are male, and the available pool of potential future women recruits is (currently) smaller.
Is it too crazy to expect that sampling for security should match the actual observed distribution (with a uniform prior)?
Is this a bad thing? I mean, romanticize how you will, but is it really better to put human (or even robot) footprints on Mars than to push the telescope programs? 225,000,000 km or 2.25 x 10^20 km - we can't live there (yet).
Paying twice as much now and the same later sounds better than normal now and 10x later.
You are going to be one of the few not screwed when the dinosaurs start running out. And they'll be closing those dirty plants down the way when coal is more expensive than gold. Isn't this still a good outcome long-term, even if it costs now?
Radiation bites Phobos Grunt.
Radiation bites Phobos Grunt.
Phobos Grunt dies.
Better to get them with the knife, in CoD. Shotguns will paint you on enemy radar, besides being more effective at clue-ing in anyone nearby that there is trouble lurking around.
I told him random does not equal 100%.
Can't resist.
The distribution of a single sample is not statistically required to reflect the full distribution; the probability of that particular sample goes down, but never equals zero. This is why anecdotes get so much distrust.
That said, I currently have an "additional screening" rate of greater than 90% in the US, while my wife is never selected. I have to wonder if things would be different, were there more prominent female terrorists.
(147,093,357 items [source]) * (2.5 kg / item [source]) / 50,000 tonnes = 7.35466785 Libraries of Congress per year.
Lemmings don't actually jump off cliffs (on their own). Really.
Anyways, you only need one Blocker and you're good to go. At least until you hit the nuke button - "Oh No!"
I, for one, welcome our puppet-sexing vomit gag overlords.
In an election year? Too dangerous to leave this entirely untouched. Hope for the best?
Hadoken!
To be pedantic: Raj Rajaratnam is a US Citizen, residing and (formerly) working in the US, born in Sri Lanka.
Sure it can.
Oh, you meant intact.
All I see is *******....
Don't forget that Antonio Perez has been overpaid in comparison to the performance of the company.
Note that his pay went up in the rankings while Kodak slid further and further down.
Yes, got hung up on paragraphs 3 and 4 there. My bad.
Their research arm is still doing quite well. If they want to sell, of course, local co-giants Xerox and Bausch + Lomb may be interested in snapping up those top optics and computer vision scientists....
Wrong, wrongity wrong wrong.
They tried going digital.
They were just too late.
I was a summer intern at KRL (Kodak Research Labs), working on digital image processing, when the whole printer thing took off, and it was painfully obvious to us that it was a terrible move. Putting Bill Lloyd (formerly head of inkjet work) in place as CTO seemed to cement things in place.
Who prints anything at home these days, anyway? Especially photos....
But... it goes to 11!
God forbid you ever try grappling....
Maybe... it was WRITTEN... by William... SHATNER!
You clearly do not live in New York. New York State Consolidated Laws-Judiciary Law Article 16 521 states that all employers of 10+ employees must pay for full employee wages, at least for the first three days of service (with the state picking up the tab thereafter).
IANAL, and this does not constitute legal advice.