Or... You do a zfs send/recv from your Oracle machine to something else that doesn't suck. You can disable any proprietary Oracle features in that process.
It takes effort or polls in the hundreds of terabytes or petabyte ranges, but it's not impossible. Probably going to be many send/recv sessions on multiple snapshots if you want to stay live while doing it, but zrepl will be happy to do all that for you.
You can't come to slashdot and ask them what you want to be when you grow up.
Why did you take CS? Because you liked something in it, or because someone told you to? If you liked something related to CS than you need to focus on it and figure out how to turn it into a career, or get yourself focused on moving in the direction that would allow it to be a career.
If you got into CS because someone told you that you should major in CS, than you need to stop now. Figure out WTF you think you might want to do with your life, and then figure out how to go in that direction. Is that even in CS or is it in some other field entirely.
Slashdot can't figure out what you want to be when you grow up, only you can. If you don't know what you want to do with your CS degree after you get out than you have to start by asking yourself why you're getting a CS degree, or even getting a degree at all.
sigh, because an FM radio can be build with about 5 components that you can make yourself in a few minutes. AM radio takes 2 or 3 and is self powered.
You don't even really have to properly calculate the values of the components, you just have to get in the general ballpark and have a tuning coil and you can pick up anything from old analog TV signals, to FM radio, to aircraft radio.
In short, if you can't build a functioning FM radio in a few minutes with random crap you can find laying around the house, then you simply aren't an EE and you know pretty much nothing about it.
FFS, the CIA has build MECHANICAL AM transmitters powered remotely by microwaves being beamed at it.
Spoken like someone who has no idea what so ever how CPUs actually work.
Raw CP/U speed gives one type of performance, parallelism gives another.
Your professor, 15 years ago, is one of those idiots who couldn't actually get a job so he went to teaching instead where all you have to do is talk theory and not actually produce real world results.
The real problem with multicore computing is it doesn't solve every problem. Some problems are inherently serial and no number of course or software solutions are going to change that.
The human mind is a MASSIVELY parallel computer, but its slow as shit compared to even the first intel CPUs when it comes to complex math. It can perform amazing feats of trigonometry by approximation almost instantly, which works well for hunting prey... but it has 0 changes of performing real time guidance something like a rocket trying to hit a specific orbit, which is easily accomplished by something like a z80 or AVR.
So I have to pay to watch the movie AND I have to bare the burden of distribution to others as well?
Yea, fuck you. Pay your business costs and sell me service that does something. Otherwise I'm simply paying you extra for no explainable reason other than you trying to get me to pay to do your job.
So you knew you fucked up, but instead of recalling the patch and preventing it from fucking over more people... you left it out there for 2 weeks because 'it takes time' to roll out an update.
As a software developer who used to be a sysadmin and has done the desktop support thing, there are about 18 obvious ways you could have mitigated the damage you claim you were aware of, some of which you've done before:
1) Recall the patch, remove it from the update servers, no one else gets it. You can do that in minute. 2) It takes 2 weeks to change the event attached to the WM_CLOSE event to behave like it did previously? Worst fucking devs ever. You and the people feeding you this line of bullshit should be fired on principal for that comment 3) The behavior specified is counter to all expected and intuit design conventions. There was NO ONE INVOLVED IN THIS MESS THAT DIDN'T REALIZE what was going to happen. Using the X to proceed required extra effort and thought. It wasn't an accident because its designed to not work that way by default so users get an 'expected' experience... which you then decided to override and do what you knew was the opposite of the expected behavior.
Let me sum it up for you: Fuck off liar. All you've shown today is that Microsoft is still full of lying bastards and nothing has really changed since bill and steve left.
My wired earbuds are lighter than any pair of Airpods will ever be
Doubtful.
The wire alone will weigh more than the headphones eventually unless they find some awesome replacement for copper and mostly the plastic/rubber sheath around the wires. And yes, thats the amount of weight we're arguing over. And at that point, power will be safely transmitted wirelessly so they'll be powered without batteries as well.
I prefer wired for the same reasons, but your entire post is full of false statements that barely apply now and are unlikely to apply in the future and really just show that you're incapable of getting out of your rut and rant of 'I hate apple, they suck cause I don't agree!' phase.
You pretend Apple is stupid because they don't fit your preference. Your argument is as retarded as linux fanboys ranting about Windows or OS X, does nothing but show how you've still got a long way to go before you actually grow up.
Yes, I "get" that you can make the device smaller (and thus lighter), but only marginally so, and at the expense of functionality and serviceability.
So what do you not understand?
SOME users prefer smaller/lighter, even marginally to more battery.
You do not.
What disorder do you have that prevents you from understanding people have different preferences, which is what we're talking about here.
The non-removable battery is not any type of advantage to me.
Emphasis mine. It appears that you understand that its not for you, but the problem seems to be that you fail to understand that you aren't the only person in existence and likewise aren't the only opinion that matters.
Your post wreaks of an 15 year old that thinks his opinion and style is the only one in the universe that possibly matters.
Don't buy apple if you don't like it, but stop this bullshit of claiming you don't understand, its just that you refuse to accept someone else has different preferences than you.
Can't decrypt it? Here let me bash your head in and leave you lying as an example in the street because you brought an illegal encryption device into 'my country'
I'm pretty sure you are missing the point.
After a few freelance 'photojourbalists' (I.e. blogggers) end up dead or in jail for life, or worse, then no one will go there and take pictures anymore.
You aren't so clever that you'll outsmart the guys who have a fun time inflicting pain and killing people because anything you try will only work once, next time they'll just kill you to be safe because you even brought a camera with you and they can't trust you that it's 'empty', or whatever silly excuse you think is going to work.
Or put you in jail for life... Or whatever. The point is, if they have you in custody... YOU WILL LOSE. They don't play by some civilized set of rules you've concocted living in your nice protected home.
The difference is that software companies are always hiding behind EULA stating that they are not responsible for anything, anywhere, ever. They get a free pass on 'my software is a broken pile of shit' because we've grown used to the fact that software devs can't produce quality software (I'm a software dev, its not open for debate, most companies produce shit software across the board, Google 100% included).
That worked for software because its new and hasn't been challenged YET.
Doesn't work when they start venturing into automobiles, where saying 'I'm not responsible for what I made' has also already been tried in court, and we beat their asses back down and made them pay out the ass for the damages and lives lost.
Google is likely very afraid of actually having to live up to standards rather than being able to pretend they set the standard.
Imagine if Android had to be 'recalled' like cars for defects because Google was liable for damages caused by their bad software?
StarTrek computers, just like Google, understand context. They could easily take into account who the speaker is and their preferences. There are also of course common defaults. When I go to the local bagel shop and ask for Earl Grey tea, they have absolutely no problem providing me with a cup of hot tea, of the Earl Grey variety.
So, outside of some random fucktard trying to over complicate things while being a smart ass (you failed, btw, dumbass), WHY would the computer think 0c is what the speaker meant? Even if some fucktard like you programmed it, the AI of the age would quickly correct itself after the first person ordered tea and corrected your bad setup. It'd then tell them who programmed it that way, so you could be properly dealt with.
Are you really comparing a MBP to a Chromebook like they serve the same roll? Really?
Maybe you're just an idiot for paying 3k for a web browser but there is no Chromebook that can do anything for me that my MBP does, other than browse the web.
If you don't do anything other than what a Chromebook does, then you're an idiot for buying anything OTHER than a Chromebook.
Your post illustrates your shortcomings and in ability to buy the right product, not any of the flaws on the current MBP
You do know America isn't a direct democracy, right? It's not even actually a democracy.
The US government is a representative republic.
You vote for people who run the country, they vote on the laws. They are called congressmen. Have you been so far under a rock that you are unaware of the electoral college?
Not sure what country you live in, but if you're an American, you're just an ignorant idiot who doesnt' know how his/her country works. If you aren't American, fair enough, let me see if I can point out some places where you're incorrect about how it works here.
But all these forums actually *are* public
No, they are not. You are 100% wrong here. Twitter is a private company. It is in fact you who are wrong here. You don't get to tell twitter what to do because you don't like it any more than you get to tell me. You don't get to tell me that I can't kick people out of my store for any reason, you don't get to tell twitter. They are a corporation, not public property. I'm sure you think its okay for them to discriminate against things you disagree with, but not against things you think are okay.
This is where you show us you're a hypocrite.
Allowing companies to censor speech will follow that same arc - eventually the government will be able to "request" that a site suppress some news article or opinion or whatever, with a wink and a nudge, and it'll be the companies doing it and not the government.
Businesses and the government censor speech ALL THE TIME. The FCC for example censors the speech that can be said on public television. BY LAW. Free speech does not mean you get to do whatever you want, whenever you want, whereever YOU want. We both know this, you're just making the choice to ignore it because you disagree in this particular case. This again shows you're a hypocrite.
Secondly, we don't allow a company to only hire whites (14th amendment) or only men (19th amendment), because that would be a violation of their rights. We don't allow a company to deny services to gays (such as wedding cakes) either.
And this is utter and complete bullshit. This IS CENSORSHIP, you just agree with this form of censorship. You are a hypocrite.
Why do we allow companies to deny 1st amendment rights?
Congratulations, you've show us you dont' understand any of the amendments you've listed, how they work and what their purpose is or where they came from. You need to go back to US History I in middle school.
To have those sections monitored and curated is a violation of free speech by the public. Companies shouldn't be in the business of curating free speech, and their response to illegal speech should be to alert the police.
Oh just fuck off asshole. Companies can do what they want with their property. You don't like it, don't use them. If the actual population agrees, the company will go out of business because no one will use them. What you want is to force EVERYONE to do what YOU think is the ONLY way things should be. You're just like the people you think you're against, the only difference is that you think you're way is right and they are wrong. Explain the actual difference between you and them, and keep in mind for everything you say one must be allowed to do, you're telling the other one they are not allowed to do something. If its your way, its cool, if its not your way, its hateful, prejudice, censorship. Hey pot, you're so black -- the little black hypocrite kettle
And just to help your ignorance, comments ARE moderated on the sites you mentioned and no not anyone can login and post, the very reason that you're required to login is so they can block you if they choose to via repeated moderation, so... try again, and get a clue on the next trip by please.
We're rapidly approaching the point where *no* opposing speech or controversial ideas will be available
Yea, and its because idiots like you are leading the charge. You're just too stupid to realize it. Read what you fucking wrote. You're all for controlling what certain groups of people do, which is exactly what you're bitching about. LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIR
If you had half a clue about the statistical likelihood of a note catching fire actually is... You wouldn't make such ignorant statements.
There are literally hundreds of things YOU do on a DAILY basis that are over million times more likely than your note catching fire and FAR more dangerous.
If you EVER get into an automobile then you have utterly and completely blown your own point out of the water.
You're taking internet sensationalized crazy over reaction and making it out to be the truth.
Statistically, the notes battery is barely a blip of difference compared to any other lipo battery.
You're overreacting out of ignorance. Go crawl back in your bunker and hide like a terrorist is going to get you, even that is statistically more likely to happen than owning a note that just randomly catches fire without being damaged
They probably love the idea: Replace you're functional buy virus ridden Intel CPU based Windows PC with a ARM based tablet that 'can run full windows 10'. Wait 2 days until the buy realizes that emulating x86 on ARM is absolutely shitastic and that the whole thing is a retarded idea, they'll return the stupid ARM 'pc'... then they'll go back out and buy a new Intel laptop. Intel wins.
Reality check:
When intel cares, they'll do something about it. They can make ARM processors (Intel even did at one point, think they stopped) as good as anyone... and they can make ARM processors as good as anyone that include REAL x86 hardware, which will then wipe out anyone else trying to get anywhere near the same performance per watt.
Intel missed mobile by dumping ARM, but ARM isn't going to replace real processors anytime soon for servers that do real work. Sure, it might replace the one dinky little server that some company puts a website on that should have been a VM on some cloud, but thats not exactly a high dollar market right there nor is it more than a handful of people.
ARM server CPUs will not be anything like what you think of as 'ARM' CPUs, at which point, they'll be a lot more like Intel CPUs with the same performance and issues.
ARM CPUs are built for different purposes than x86 CPUs. They will never have the exact same level of capabilities and you'll never use them interchangeably.
ARM CPUs from different fabs can be used the interchangeably because they ARE the same CPU. Its all from the same initial designs, just different configurations. A Qualcomm ARM CPU is never going to be ridiculously better than a Samsung ARM CPU because they are both ARM designs, same cores, same roots, same everything, hell in reality, probably Fab'd in the same plant on the same production lines!
Telnet has 0 authentication built into it. It just connects you to a port and has some extensions to relay environment variables such as term type to the remote end. The remote host MAY use something like 'login' on most UNIXes to authenticate you after the fact, but it has nothing at all to do with the Telnet protocol.
FTP (by RFC) supports any authentication type, which is why you can use FTP securely when you use proper authentication protocols like say Kerberos. If you use plain text password for FTP on an unsecured network, yes it's unsafe. Kerborized FTP? At no point will you get my password because I never send it to the server! And if you DO get my ticket... It's time sensitive and only valid ONCE... Since you had to get it when I was using it... That means the ticket you stole from me is worthless.
Now stop for a second and look in the mirror,. THAT is an epic fail. Wipe the arrogance off your smug face and you'll probably stop getting schooled by people who have forgotten more about security than your entire total sum of knowledge.
. . . Twitter making a claim that they can not possibly back up. If congress passes a law to make it a legal requirement, Twitter will do it.
All that they've done here is made a political move that people like you have believed, yet it has exactly 0 substance behind it.
We already KNOW they sell data feeds to surveillance companies, and we already KNOW that even when they cut them off... they sell the exact same data to a 'new' company, that just happens to have all the same employees as the old one last month...
Twitter didn't do anything but lie and you bought it. The biggest failure in this discussion is you, for believing a word they said. Shame on you.
Slashdot Mirror
Native Hawaiians aren't native Americans. They are Pacific islanders, much more closely related to Asia than the Americas.
These people were Hawaiians before there were 'native americans'
Or ... You do a zfs send/recv from your Oracle machine to something else that doesn't suck. You can disable any proprietary Oracle features in that process.
It takes effort or polls in the hundreds of terabytes or petabyte ranges, but it's not impossible. Probably going to be many send/recv sessions on multiple snapshots if you want to stay live while doing it, but zrepl will be happy to do all that for you.
Its worth pointing out that its not a 'gravity way' at all. Its a simple compression wave. Gravity has exactly 0 to do with it.
By calling it a gravity wave, you just look stupid and ignorant of the topic of discussion.
Thats typical for slashdot submissions and editors, but generally the comments have higher standards.
And this is why no one gives a fuck about internet petitions, people that create them are ignorant morons.
He has to be tried AND CONVICTED before he can be pardoned.
You can't come to slashdot and ask them what you want to be when you grow up.
Why did you take CS? Because you liked something in it, or because someone told you to? If you liked something related to CS than you need to focus on it and figure out how to turn it into a career, or get yourself focused on moving in the direction that would allow it to be a career.
If you got into CS because someone told you that you should major in CS, than you need to stop now. Figure out WTF you think you might want to do with your life, and then figure out how to go in that direction. Is that even in CS or is it in some other field entirely.
Slashdot can't figure out what you want to be when you grow up, only you can. If you don't know what you want to do with your CS degree after you get out than you have to start by asking yourself why you're getting a CS degree, or even getting a degree at all.
Exactly the opposite. The first chip you get is going to nearly instantly spider across the entire surface.
GG is super scratch resistent ... and as such, brittle as fuck, hence why your smart phone doesn't scratch ... instead it just shatters.
sigh, because an FM radio can be build with about 5 components that you can make yourself in a few minutes. AM radio takes 2 or 3 and is self powered.
You don't even really have to properly calculate the values of the components, you just have to get in the general ballpark and have a tuning coil and you can pick up anything from old analog TV signals, to FM radio, to aircraft radio.
In short, if you can't build a functioning FM radio in a few minutes with random crap you can find laying around the house, then you simply aren't an EE and you know pretty much nothing about it.
FFS, the CIA has build MECHANICAL AM transmitters powered remotely by microwaves being beamed at it.
If you couldn't see the car stopping then you weren't paying attention. The Tesla saw it with radar, by definition that requires line of site.
You can look over, under, around and even through the windows of some vehicles. Can you figure out which one happened here?
Spoken like someone who has no idea what so ever how CPUs actually work.
Raw CP/U speed gives one type of performance, parallelism gives another.
Your professor, 15 years ago, is one of those idiots who couldn't actually get a job so he went to teaching instead where all you have to do is talk theory and not actually produce real world results.
The real problem with multicore computing is it doesn't solve every problem. Some problems are inherently serial and no number of course or software solutions are going to change that.
The human mind is a MASSIVELY parallel computer, but its slow as shit compared to even the first intel CPUs when it comes to complex math. It can perform amazing feats of trigonometry by approximation almost instantly, which works well for hunting prey ... but it has 0 changes of performing real time guidance something like a rocket trying to hit a specific orbit, which is easily accomplished by something like a z80 or AVR.
. . . All of that is pretty easy to verify online with some googling ...
Perhaps your own conflicting feelings about your sexuality are more controlling your post than logic.
You are of course able to ignore the world and facts and think what you want, but you'll never get any happier by doing so.
You need to focus on your own issues. Use science rather than emotion.
So I have to pay to watch the movie AND I have to bare the burden of distribution to others as well?
Yea, fuck you. Pay your business costs and sell me service that does something. Otherwise I'm simply paying you extra for no explainable reason other than you trying to get me to pay to do your job.
So you knew you fucked up, but instead of recalling the patch and preventing it from fucking over more people ... you left it out there for 2 weeks because 'it takes time' to roll out an update.
As a software developer who used to be a sysadmin and has done the desktop support thing, there are about 18 obvious ways you could have mitigated the damage you claim you were aware of, some of which you've done before:
1) Recall the patch, remove it from the update servers, no one else gets it. You can do that in minute. ... which you then decided to override and do what you knew was the opposite of the expected behavior.
2) It takes 2 weeks to change the event attached to the WM_CLOSE event to behave like it did previously? Worst fucking devs ever. You and the people feeding you this line of bullshit should be fired on principal for that comment
3) The behavior specified is counter to all expected and intuit design conventions. There was NO ONE INVOLVED IN THIS MESS THAT DIDN'T REALIZE what was going to happen. Using the X to proceed required extra effort and thought. It wasn't an accident because its designed to not work that way by default so users get an 'expected' experience
Let me sum it up for you: Fuck off liar. All you've shown today is that Microsoft is still full of lying bastards and nothing has really changed since bill and steve left.
My wired earbuds are lighter than any pair of Airpods will ever be
Doubtful.
The wire alone will weigh more than the headphones eventually unless they find some awesome replacement for copper and mostly the plastic/rubber sheath around the wires. And yes, thats the amount of weight we're arguing over. And at that point, power will be safely transmitted wirelessly so they'll be powered without batteries as well.
I prefer wired for the same reasons, but your entire post is full of false statements that barely apply now and are unlikely to apply in the future and really just show that you're incapable of getting out of your rut and rant of 'I hate apple, they suck cause I don't agree!' phase.
You pretend Apple is stupid because they don't fit your preference. Your argument is as retarded as linux fanboys ranting about Windows or OS X, does nothing but show how you've still got a long way to go before you actually grow up.
Yes, I "get" that you can make the device smaller (and thus lighter), but only marginally so, and at the expense of functionality and serviceability.
So what do you not understand?
SOME users prefer smaller/lighter, even marginally to more battery.
You do not.
What disorder do you have that prevents you from understanding people have different preferences, which is what we're talking about here.
The non-removable battery is not any type of advantage to me.
Emphasis mine. It appears that you understand that its not for you, but the problem seems to be that you fail to understand that you aren't the only person in existence and likewise aren't the only opinion that matters.
Your post wreaks of an 15 year old that thinks his opinion and style is the only one in the universe that possibly matters.
Don't buy apple if you don't like it, but stop this bullshit of claiming you don't understand, its just that you refuse to accept someone else has different preferences than you.
You appear to be the one with the problem.
Can't decrypt it? Here let me bash your head in and leave you lying as an example in the street because you brought an illegal encryption device into 'my country'
I'm pretty sure you are missing the point.
After a few freelance 'photojourbalists' (I.e. blogggers) end up dead or in jail for life, or worse, then no one will go there and take pictures anymore.
You aren't so clever that you'll outsmart the guys who have a fun time inflicting pain and killing people because anything you try will only work once, next time they'll just kill you to be safe because you even brought a camera with you and they can't trust you that it's 'empty', or whatever silly excuse you think is going to work.
Or put you in jail for life ... Or whatever. The point is, if they have you in custody ... YOU WILL LOSE. They don't play by some civilized set of rules you've concocted living in your nice protected home.
The difference is that software companies are always hiding behind EULA stating that they are not responsible for anything, anywhere, ever. They get a free pass on 'my software is a broken pile of shit' because we've grown used to the fact that software devs can't produce quality software (I'm a software dev, its not open for debate, most companies produce shit software across the board, Google 100% included).
That worked for software because its new and hasn't been challenged YET.
Doesn't work when they start venturing into automobiles, where saying 'I'm not responsible for what I made' has also already been tried in court, and we beat their asses back down and made them pay out the ass for the damages and lives lost.
Google is likely very afraid of actually having to live up to standards rather than being able to pretend they set the standard.
Imagine if Android had to be 'recalled' like cars for defects because Google was liable for damages caused by their bad software?
StarTrek computers, just like Google, understand context. They could easily take into account who the speaker is and their preferences. There are also of course common defaults. When I go to the local bagel shop and ask for Earl Grey tea, they have absolutely no problem providing me with a cup of hot tea, of the Earl Grey variety.
So, outside of some random fucktard trying to over complicate things while being a smart ass (you failed, btw, dumbass), WHY would the computer think 0c is what the speaker meant? Even if some fucktard like you programmed it, the AI of the age would quickly correct itself after the first person ordered tea and corrected your bad setup. It'd then tell them who programmed it that way, so you could be properly dealt with.
Gosh you were so clever.
You got me, I did misread.
From his post:
run the same Google Chrome as a Wintel machine for 1/3 the price or less runs
So ... He's too stupid to buy a Chromebook but all he thinks matters is chrome.
Yea, I was totally wildly off base on this one because I said Chromebook ...
Are you really comparing a MBP to a Chromebook like they serve the same roll? Really?
Maybe you're just an idiot for paying 3k for a web browser but there is no Chromebook that can do anything for me that my MBP does, other than browse the web.
If you don't do anything other than what a Chromebook does, then you're an idiot for buying anything OTHER than a Chromebook.
Your post illustrates your shortcomings and in ability to buy the right product, not any of the flaws on the current MBP
You do know America isn't a direct democracy, right? It's not even actually a democracy.
The US government is a representative republic.
You vote for people who run the country, they vote on the laws. They are called congressmen. Have you been so far under a rock that you are unaware of the electoral college?
Not sure what country you live in, but if you're an American, you're just an ignorant idiot who doesnt' know how his/her country works. If you aren't American, fair enough, let me see if I can point out some places where you're incorrect about how it works here.
But all these forums actually *are* public
No, they are not. You are 100% wrong here. Twitter is a private company. It is in fact you who are wrong here. You don't get to tell twitter what to do because you don't like it any more than you get to tell me. You don't get to tell me that I can't kick people out of my store for any reason, you don't get to tell twitter. They are a corporation, not public property. I'm sure you think its okay for them to discriminate against things you disagree with, but not against things you think are okay.
This is where you show us you're a hypocrite.
Allowing companies to censor speech will follow that same arc - eventually the government will be able to "request" that a site suppress some news article or opinion or whatever, with a wink and a nudge, and it'll be the companies doing it and not the government.
Businesses and the government censor speech ALL THE TIME. The FCC for example censors the speech that can be said on public television. BY LAW. Free speech does not mean you get to do whatever you want, whenever you want, whereever YOU want. We both know this, you're just making the choice to ignore it because you disagree in this particular case. This again shows you're a hypocrite.
Secondly, we don't allow a company to only hire whites (14th amendment) or only men (19th amendment), because that would be a violation of their rights. We don't allow a company to deny services to gays (such as wedding cakes) either.
And this is utter and complete bullshit. This IS CENSORSHIP, you just agree with this form of censorship. You are a hypocrite.
Why do we allow companies to deny 1st amendment rights?
Congratulations, you've show us you dont' understand any of the amendments you've listed, how they work and what their purpose is or where they came from. You need to go back to US History I in middle school.
To have those sections monitored and curated is a violation of free speech by the public. Companies shouldn't be in the business of curating free speech, and their response to illegal speech should be to alert the police.
Oh just fuck off asshole. Companies can do what they want with their property. You don't like it, don't use them. If the actual population agrees, the company will go out of business because no one will use them. What you want is to force EVERYONE to do what YOU think is the ONLY way things should be. You're just like the people you think you're against, the only difference is that you think you're way is right and they are wrong. Explain the actual difference between you and them, and keep in mind for everything you say one must be allowed to do, you're telling the other one they are not allowed to do something. If its your way, its cool, if its not your way, its hateful, prejudice, censorship. Hey pot, you're so black -- the little black hypocrite kettle
And just to help your ignorance, comments ARE moderated on the sites you mentioned and no not anyone can login and post, the very reason that you're required to login is so they can block you if they choose to via repeated moderation, so ... try again, and get a clue on the next trip by please.
We're rapidly approaching the point where *no* opposing speech or controversial ideas will be available
Yea, and its because idiots like you are leading the charge. You're just too stupid to realize it. Read what you fucking wrote. You're all for controlling what certain groups of people do, which is exactly what you're bitching about. LOOK IN THE FUCKING MIR
If you had half a clue about the statistical likelihood of a note catching fire actually is ... You wouldn't make such ignorant statements.
There are literally hundreds of things YOU do on a DAILY basis that are over million times more likely than your note catching fire and FAR more dangerous.
If you EVER get into an automobile then you have utterly and completely blown your own point out of the water.
You're taking internet sensationalized crazy over reaction and making it out to be the truth.
Statistically, the notes battery is barely a blip of difference compared to any other lipo battery.
You're overreacting out of ignorance. Go crawl back in your bunker and hide like a terrorist is going to get you, even that is statistically more likely to happen than owning a note that just randomly catches fire without being damaged
They probably love the idea: Replace you're functional buy virus ridden Intel CPU based Windows PC with a ARM based tablet that 'can run full windows 10'. Wait 2 days until the buy realizes that emulating x86 on ARM is absolutely shitastic and that the whole thing is a retarded idea, they'll return the stupid ARM 'pc' ... then they'll go back out and buy a new Intel laptop. Intel wins.
Reality check:
When intel cares, they'll do something about it. They can make ARM processors (Intel even did at one point, think they stopped) as good as anyone ... and they can make ARM processors as good as anyone that include REAL x86 hardware, which will then wipe out anyone else trying to get anywhere near the same performance per watt.
Intel missed mobile by dumping ARM, but ARM isn't going to replace real processors anytime soon for servers that do real work. Sure, it might replace the one dinky little server that some company puts a website on that should have been a VM on some cloud, but thats not exactly a high dollar market right there nor is it more than a handful of people.
ARM server CPUs will not be anything like what you think of as 'ARM' CPUs, at which point, they'll be a lot more like Intel CPUs with the same performance and issues.
ARM CPUs are built for different purposes than x86 CPUs. They will never have the exact same level of capabilities and you'll never use them interchangeably.
ARM CPUs from different fabs can be used the interchangeably because they ARE the same CPU. Its all from the same initial designs, just different configurations. A Qualcomm ARM CPU is never going to be ridiculously better than a Samsung ARM CPU because they are both ARM designs, same cores, same roots, same everything, hell in reality, probably Fab'd in the same plant on the same production lines!
If you want to be a technical asshole:
Telnet has 0 authentication built into it. It just connects you to a port and has some extensions to relay environment variables such as term type to the remote end. The remote host MAY use something like 'login' on most UNIXes to authenticate you after the fact, but it has nothing at all to do with the Telnet protocol.
FTP (by RFC) supports any authentication type, which is why you can use FTP securely when you use proper authentication protocols like say Kerberos. If you use plain text password for FTP on an unsecured network, yes it's unsafe. Kerborized FTP? At no point will you get my password because I never send it to the server! And if you DO get my ticket ... It's time sensitive and only valid ONCE ... Since you had to get it when I was using it ... That means the ticket you stole from me is worthless.
Now stop for a second and look in the mirror,. THAT is an epic fail. Wipe the arrogance off your smug face and you'll probably stop getting schooled by people who have forgotten more about security than your entire total sum of knowledge.
. . . Twitter making a claim that they can not possibly back up. If congress passes a law to make it a legal requirement, Twitter will do it.
All that they've done here is made a political move that people like you have believed, yet it has exactly 0 substance behind it.
We already KNOW they sell data feeds to surveillance companies, and we already KNOW that even when they cut them off ... they sell the exact same data to a 'new' company, that just happens to have all the same employees as the old one last month ...
Twitter didn't do anything but lie and you bought it. The biggest failure in this discussion is you, for believing a word they said. Shame on you.