Hey everyone, listen here: pcermomb and I had finally got to an agreement, nobody eats meat anymore, ok?.
Now, let's get to the other issue... what the hell are we going to do with natural predators beside man? I mean, it's obviously not right for them to murder other animals either, right?
So, we are going to need a lot of police. Also, how the fuck do you read his rights to a fucking lion with an antelope between his teeth?
When you say "the animal died humanely", you mean that it was an animal, member of the human species, and it then died? I mean, that's the only way a human can do things: Humanely. The word actually means "In a human way". Well, there's no other way for humans to do things than in a human way!.
Usage example: "That human priest raped those kids humanely". And "That soldier murdered that Iraqi family in a human manner".
I think we should just say "painlessly". I don't think "humanely" means what we think it means anymore.
Ok, either you are a very successful troll, or a very stupid person. I really can't tell... and I'm good at this.
Anyway, if you are a troll, congratulations, you've done an amazing job today. puddi, puddi, puddi.
Now, if you aren't... What the hell are you talking about? Giving cows a chance? Are you fucking stupid?
Look, there is NO GOD, there is just nature. And by the mere fact that we are here, I can tell you for sure 2 things: There's been some fucking and some eating going on here for a LONG TIME. That's something that I never understood. That's an animals life: You are born, you grow and survive as long as you can, try to reproduce, and then die. Most of the time, you get eaten. It's very rare to see in nature animals that die of old age. It just doesn't happen that much outside of humans and human's pets. Long before any animal can die of old age, it becomes older and slower, and gets eaten. Why is it wrong or unnatural for us to just do the same? Do you have any idea of how many animals have lived and died since life evolved on earth?
But nobody said it better than old good George. I was going to redact this piece a little, but I can't do that to this awesome piece, so here it is, in whole:
"'My God has a bigger dick than your God!' That's how it is, isn't it? Thousands of years, and all the best wars too, the bloodiest, most brutal wars fought all based on religious hatred, which is fine with me. Anytime a bunch of holy people want to kill each other, I'm a happy guy. But don't be giving me all this shit about the sanctity of life. I mean, even if there were such a thing, I don't think it's something you can blame on God. No, you know where the sanctity of life came from? We made it up! You know why? Cause we're alive! Self-interest. Living people have a strong interest in promoting the idea that somehow life is sacred. You don't see Abbott and Costello running around, talking about this shit, do you? We're not hearing a whole lot from Mussolini on the subject. What's the latest from JFK? Not a god damned thing, cause JFK, Mussolini, and Abbott and Costello are fucking dead. They're fucking dead, and dead people give less than a shit about the sanctity of life. Only living people care about it, so the whole thing grows out of a completely biased point of view. It's a self-serving, man-made bullshit story. It's one of these things we tell ourselves so we'll feel noble. Life is sacred, makes you feel noble.
Well let me ask you this, if everything that ever lived is dead, and everything alive is going to die, where does the sacred part come in? I'm having trouble with that. Because even with the stuff we preach about the sanctity of life, we don't practice it. Look at what we kill. Mosquitos and flies, because they're pests! Lions and tigers, because it's fun! Chickens and pigs, because we're hungry. Pheasants and quail, because it's fun, and we're hungry. And people! We kill people, because they're pests... and it's fun!
And you might have noticed something else, the sanctity of life doesn't seem to apply to cancer cells, does it? You never see a bumpersticker that says 'save the tumors' or 'I brake for advanced melanoma.' No, viruses, mold, mildew, maggots, fungus, weeds, e. coli bacteria, the crabs, nothing sacred about those things. So at best, the sanctity of life is kind of a selective thing. We get to choose which forms of life we feel are sacred, and we get to kill the rest. Pretty neat deal, huh? You know how we got it? We made the whole fucking thing up! Made it up, the same way we made up the death penalty. We made them both up, the sanctity of life and the death penalty. Aren't we versatile?".
Learn something from that magnificent old fuck. Eat a stake tonight, stop trying so hard to be holier than thou.
Seriously. Look, Fuck the whales. They had their chance at life, they had a nice evolution plan, and it was working very well, but they'd forgotten to take something into account: Japan. If you have tentacles, or you are huge and unique, or if you have Shitting Dick-Nipples, you have to watch the fuck out, 'cause Japan is coming for you. The Dodo was ugly as fuck and tasted like crap... and it went, well, the way of the dodo. You don't care about Siberian Tigers either.
Now, even if you care about endangered species, you care up to a point. That is, unless you are a crazy-ass peta member or something, you limit yourself to sending a donation, or going to a stupid sit-down somewhere. Now, you tell us that FUCKING COWS are going extinct, and there's going to be chaos on the streets. People will fucking murder politicians and feed them to the cows. They'll offer virgin sacrifices and pray to Thor until they can guarantee that they'll keep getting their fair share of beef.
So, yeah, being delicious with us humans around seems like an awesome idea.
Sorry to repost this, but I accidentally posted it as AC, and nobody is going to see it at -1.
I can't believe it either... but there is a whole industry dedicated to dealing with windows. But it's the way our world works, sadly.
We create artificial scarcity, force people to use an inferior and limited technology, that has ridiculous drawbacks, and requires a tremendous workforce around it just to keep it functional. And we keep people using it even when there are cheaper, infinitely better, more reliable and future-proof technologies. The reason is simple: Through artificial scarcity, we keep the money flowing in a certain direction, we keep control in the same hands, and we create hugely profitable but completely pointless industries.
Think about it, we could be running 100% on clean, future-proof, secure and cheap nuclear energy. Instead, we rely on oil. The infrastructure that oil demands is huge, the drawbacks are incredible, we are polluting the environment, drilling the oceans to get some more black juice out of the earth at a huge risk.
We could also have moved all of our communications to ip-based networks, cutting down costs, and removing the need for so many different networks. We could have a single infrastructure that would provide us with high-bandwidth, low-latency internet everywhere, and put everything from phone calls to TV through that network. Instead, we are running different networks for each purpose, and within each purpose different networks for each provider. If we re-purposed all cellphone towers from all providers to give us just internet access, we could have 100% coverage everywhere in the world. Instead, we have huge overlapping (areas serviced by several providers), and huge areas with no coverage at all.
We could also be using just Free Software. It's open, transparent, reliable, cheap, and ethical. Instead, most people use windows. That means triplicating new hardware purchases, cutting 70% on hardware's lifespan, spending incredible resources in pointless activities like antivirus production/sale/deployment, and an IT structure several times bigger than required, not to mention all the lost time and profit due to preventable downtime.
But it's the way the economy works. It's the way the usual people keep getting richer, while keeping the majority of the world in line, quite and productive.
It's absolutely sad, but it's not just something that happens only in software, and it's certainly no accident.
Go find any CD from 1997, and it'll work fine. Get a disk from 2000, and you might get lucky. Get a disk from 2004, and it'll surely be dead already.
HP CDRs recorded at 2X back in 1995 will surely last me 50 years. Remember when Verbatim used to honor the name of their company? Now they become oxidized after a few years (months, sometimes).
I do just that. Hard drives have been my favorite choice of storage for a while... I think since we hit the 40GB barrier on HDs. They've been incredible reliable and cheap since we got to that point. Back in the days of 8GB IDE Drives, I wouldn't have dared to keep backups in HDs... to unreliable and expensive. Now I have several HDs with all my files. It's a good way to pay for backups too: You are not spending money on backup drives... you are upgrading your current storage. Instead of adding drives, you take your current drive out as it is, and put in a new, bigger drive, leaving the old one as backup. You still keep all the old data in your current drive, for redundancy and easy access.
The way storage capacity is growing allows you to keep the entire previous decade of backups in a tiny portion of your current HD. Doing this, I went from 80GB IDE on my PC, to 160GB SATA, then 320GB SATA, then I got rid of my desktop completely and went to just 500GB on my laptop, plus 2TB external. I don't backup shit, only the important stuff. For stuff you don't mind being public, the net is your best storage. I don't keep Movies, Music, etc. I just keep ~200GB of Metal on my HD for everyday use. Anything else, you just seed it, and re-download it whenever you need it.
Progress in media storage, but the beatles still suck as much as they did 40 years ago. It's amazing, but the first pop band sucks even harder than all the shitty pop that has been mass-produce since.
The best way is to craft a black fax. You can fit thousands of pages on only a few minutes of communication. Compression works very well when the entire image is nothing but black pixels:)
Now, this of course won't make a difference, since big companies don't use fax machines, they use fax2email servers, like Hylafax or similar. In most cases they don't even host it, their telco does it for them.
I don't use ANY kind of so called "hardware" solutions. Cisco is overrated, period.
First, it's not a "hardware" solution. It's OLD and OUTDATED hardware with some good NIC in there, and a crappy operating system.
You'll do much better with a Unix server. CISCO rarely runs at wire-speed, but you can get a Unix router to run at wire-speed with just bit of good hardware (That'll be much cheaper than any cisco router).
Same thing for Dell, HP and other overpriced servers. Build your own, and you'll get exactly the same for a much better price (or something much better for exactly the same money if you prefer).
I've had to make my own baluns to replace existing ones that broke in the middle of the night (or on a weekend) several times. (Back when E1s where more popular, now everybody is getting SIP trunks).
After the hosting company I worked for got an old an outdated server cracked, with hundreds of websites defaced, and we found out that the backup tapes were fried, I wrote a perl script to recover most files from the google cache:). They had only defaced all index.html files... some sites got PHP files replaced with static versions, but it fixed 99% of our issues.
Fucking stupid gringo. Why the fuck are you assuming that we have less freedom on the internet outside the US?
That's the kind of us-centric thought that is keeping your population stupid, and that gives all of us a reason to laugh at you guys constantly.
I live in Argentina. I pay 24 dollars for 4 MB (Cable), and I have absolutely no restrictions whatsoever. And I live in a small town (700.000 inhabitants). I also pay less than 30 dollars for unlimited 3G. When I say unlimited, I mean it. I trafficked a bit over 30GB on my 3G last month, and I torrent 24/7 on my home connection.
So STFU and open up your mind. There is a world outside of the US, and it doesn't look like North Korea.
Here is what happens: Anon comes in with a novelty idea,/b/tards join in "just for the lulz". Then, new Anon (oldfag Anon is a cold, merciless beast. newfag Anon is the conscious, moral, cause-oriented joke of the internet) puts a tag on it and says they are doing it for X. I mean, some said they did the Habbo raids to fight racism. They also said they did project chanology to protect the victims of Scientology. Bullshit, they did it for the lulz.
Of course, DDoSing, Raiding, IRL stalking, etc, are fucking funny, and if it happens to overlay with a good cause, even better. Let them have fun, and bring them down while they are at it.
But in this case, it's pretty obvious that Anon had nothing to do with Amazon Europe going down. Anon is nothing but a bunch of script kiddies, and they don't have the sophistication nor the combined bandwidth to bring down Amazon with a ddos attack.
Like most in Latin America during the 70's. It was called Operation Condor by the CIA.
So, what, that makes you proud or something?
And, since you were wondering, between '73 and '82 around 30.000 people where killed... well, "disappeared".
Now, explain how does changes our freedoms almost 40 years later? The people responsible for those massacres are in jail. Well, not all of them, Nixon and Ford, as well as many CIA jackals are outside our jurisdiction.
I didn't say that they couldn't "say" what they wanted, I say they couldn't push their agenda. There is a huge difference between expressing your opinion, and brainwashing thousands of people into believing that a zombie-jew from outer space is the messiah, using that power to become powerful and rich, and then using that power to play the system into allowing your brainwashing techniques to be used in public education.
Freedom of speech should always be a first priority, but it stops at that. Brainwashing millions of people is not freedom of speech. Religion is not freedom of speech, it's a crime against humanity.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok. I agree with you.
Hey everyone, listen here: pcermomb and I had finally got to an agreement, nobody eats meat anymore, ok?.
Now, let's get to the other issue ... what the hell are we going to do with natural predators beside man? I mean, it's obviously not right for them to murder other animals either, right?
So, we are going to need a lot of police. Also, how the fuck do you read his rights to a fucking lion with an antelope between his teeth?
Yup. They also pray to him. All hail Joe Pesci. /Damn, second Carlin reference in the same fucking thread. //Most quotable bastard since Oscar Wilde.
When you say "the animal died humanely", you mean that it was an animal, member of the human species, and it then died? I mean, that's the only way a human can do things: Humanely. The word actually means "In a human way". Well, there's no other way for humans to do things than in a human way!.
Usage example: "That human priest raped those kids humanely". And "That soldier murdered that Iraqi family in a human manner".
I think we should just say "painlessly". I don't think "humanely" means what we think it means anymore.
Ok, either you are a very successful troll, or a very stupid person. I really can't tell ... and I'm good at this.
Anyway, if you are a troll, congratulations, you've done an amazing job today. puddi, puddi, puddi.
Now, if you aren't ... What the hell are you talking about? Giving cows a chance? Are you fucking stupid?
Look, there is NO GOD, there is just nature. And by the mere fact that we are here, I can tell you for sure 2 things: There's been some fucking and some eating going on here for a LONG TIME. That's something that I never understood. That's an animals life: You are born, you grow and survive as long as you can, try to reproduce, and then die. Most of the time, you get eaten. It's very rare to see in nature animals that die of old age. It just doesn't happen that much outside of humans and human's pets. Long before any animal can die of old age, it becomes older and slower, and gets eaten. Why is it wrong or unnatural for us to just do the same? Do you have any idea of how many animals have lived and died since life evolved on earth?
But nobody said it better than old good George. I was going to redact this piece a little, but I can't do that to this awesome piece, so here it is, in whole:
"'My God has a bigger dick than your God!' That's how it is, isn't it? Thousands of years, and all the best wars too, the bloodiest, most brutal wars fought all based on religious hatred, which is fine with me. Anytime a bunch of holy people want to kill each other, I'm a happy guy. But don't be giving me all this shit about the sanctity of life. I mean, even if there were such a thing, I don't think it's something you can blame on God. No, you know where the sanctity of life came from? We made it up! You know why? Cause we're alive! Self-interest. Living people have a strong interest in promoting the idea that somehow life is sacred. You don't see Abbott and Costello running around, talking about this shit, do you? We're not hearing a whole lot from Mussolini on the subject. What's the latest from JFK? Not a god damned thing, cause JFK, Mussolini, and Abbott and Costello are fucking dead. They're fucking dead, and dead people give less than a shit about the sanctity of life. Only living people care about it, so the whole thing grows out of a completely biased point of view. It's a self-serving, man-made bullshit story. It's one of these things we tell ourselves so we'll feel noble. Life is sacred, makes you feel noble.
Well let me ask you this, if everything that ever lived is dead, and everything alive is going to die, where does the sacred part come in? I'm having trouble with that. Because even with the stuff we preach about the sanctity of life, we don't practice it. Look at what we kill. Mosquitos and flies, because they're pests! Lions and tigers, because it's fun! Chickens and pigs, because we're hungry. Pheasants and quail, because it's fun, and we're hungry. And people! We kill people, because they're pests... and it's fun!
And you might have noticed something else, the sanctity of life doesn't seem to apply to cancer cells, does it? You never see a bumpersticker that says 'save the tumors' or 'I brake for advanced melanoma.' No, viruses, mold, mildew, maggots, fungus, weeds, e. coli bacteria, the crabs, nothing sacred about those things. So at best, the sanctity of life is kind of a selective thing. We get to choose which forms of life we feel are sacred, and we get to kill the rest. Pretty neat deal, huh? You know how we got it? We made the whole fucking thing up! Made it up, the same way we made up the death penalty. We made them both up, the sanctity of life and the death penalty. Aren't we versatile?".
Learn something from that magnificent old fuck. Eat a stake tonight, stop trying so hard to be holier than thou.
puddi, puddi, puddi
Survival strategies: Being delicious.
Seriously. Look, Fuck the whales. They had their chance at life, they had a nice evolution plan, and it was working very well, but they'd forgotten to take something into account: Japan. If you have tentacles, or you are huge and unique, or if you have Shitting Dick-Nipples, you have to watch the fuck out, 'cause Japan is coming for you. The Dodo was ugly as fuck and tasted like crap ... and it went, well, the way of the dodo. You don't care about Siberian Tigers either.
Now, even if you care about endangered species, you care up to a point. That is, unless you are a crazy-ass peta member or something, you limit yourself to sending a donation, or going to a stupid sit-down somewhere. Now, you tell us that FUCKING COWS are going extinct, and there's going to be chaos on the streets. People will fucking murder politicians and feed them to the cows. They'll offer virgin sacrifices and pray to Thor until they can guarantee that they'll keep getting their fair share of beef.
So, yeah, being delicious with us humans around seems like an awesome idea.
Successful Troll is Successful.
the Scandanavian "Black Metal Belt" should move some degrees southward ....
Great. Can I have an awesome orgy with Angela Gossow AND Lotta Hoglin?
Ok, ok, can I at least get consensual sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation with Anette Olzon please?
Are you sure you can't get the printer to work on GNU/Linux?
Maybe there's no exact driver for that printer, but a similar one might work.
I've yet to come across a printer that won't work right with GNU/Linux and CUPS.
Try connecting it to a GNU/Linux install and use similar drivers for it, odds are, it'll work just fine.
Sorry to repost this, but I accidentally posted it as AC, and nobody is going to see it at -1.
I can't believe it either ... but there is a whole industry dedicated to dealing with windows. But it's the way our world works, sadly.
We create artificial scarcity, force people to use an inferior and limited technology, that has ridiculous drawbacks, and requires a tremendous workforce around it just to keep it functional. And we keep people using it even when there are cheaper, infinitely better, more reliable and future-proof technologies. The reason is simple: Through artificial scarcity, we keep the money flowing in a certain direction, we keep control in the same hands, and we create hugely profitable but completely pointless industries.
Think about it, we could be running 100% on clean, future-proof, secure and cheap nuclear energy. Instead, we rely on oil. The infrastructure that oil demands is huge, the drawbacks are incredible, we are polluting the environment, drilling the oceans to get some more black juice out of the earth at a huge risk.
We could also have moved all of our communications to ip-based networks, cutting down costs, and removing the need for so many different networks. We could have a single infrastructure that would provide us with high-bandwidth, low-latency internet everywhere, and put everything from phone calls to TV through that network. Instead, we are running different networks for each purpose, and within each purpose different networks for each provider. If we re-purposed all cellphone towers from all providers to give us just internet access, we could have 100% coverage everywhere in the world. Instead, we have huge overlapping (areas serviced by several providers), and huge areas with no coverage at all.
We could also be using just Free Software. It's open, transparent, reliable, cheap, and ethical. Instead, most people use windows. That means triplicating new hardware purchases, cutting 70% on hardware's lifespan, spending incredible resources in pointless activities like antivirus production/sale/deployment, and an IT structure several times bigger than required, not to mention all the lost time and profit due to preventable downtime.
But it's the way the economy works. It's the way the usual people keep getting richer, while keeping the majority of the world in line, quite and productive.
It's absolutely sad, but it's not just something that happens only in software, and it's certainly no accident.
You mean newfag, right?
That's why you are not supposed to use privative software. Your data is NOT your data, it's theirs.
On the other hand, I'm sure VLC will be able to read every format it reads now 30 years from now.
That's precisely the point.
Go find any CD from 1997, and it'll work fine. Get a disk from 2000, and you might get lucky. Get a disk from 2004, and it'll surely be dead already.
HP CDRs recorded at 2X back in 1995 will surely last me 50 years. Remember when Verbatim used to honor the name of their company? Now they become oxidized after a few years (months, sometimes).
I do just that. Hard drives have been my favorite choice of storage for a while ... I think since we hit the 40GB barrier on HDs. They've been incredible reliable and cheap since we got to that point. Back in the days of 8GB IDE Drives, I wouldn't have dared to keep backups in HDs ... to unreliable and expensive. Now I have several HDs with all my files. It's a good way to pay for backups too: You are not spending money on backup drives ... you are upgrading your current storage. Instead of adding drives, you take your current drive out as it is, and put in a new, bigger drive, leaving the old one as backup. You still keep all the old data in your current drive, for redundancy and easy access.
The way storage capacity is growing allows you to keep the entire previous decade of backups in a tiny portion of your current HD. Doing this, I went from 80GB IDE on my PC, to 160GB SATA, then 320GB SATA, then I got rid of my desktop completely and went to just 500GB on my laptop, plus 2TB external. I don't backup shit, only the important stuff. For stuff you don't mind being public, the net is your best storage. I don't keep Movies, Music, etc. I just keep ~200GB of Metal on my HD for everyday use. Anything else, you just seed it, and re-download it whenever you need it.
Progress in media storage, but the beatles still suck as much as they did 40 years ago. It's amazing, but the first pop band sucks even harder than all the shitty pop that has been mass-produce since.
It works perfectly, I love it.
Oh, wait, that's Adblock. My bad. //This won't go anywhere. But he'll get some nice cash out of venture capitalists before they figure it out.
Only in math, not in programming.
The best way is to craft a black fax. You can fit thousands of pages on only a few minutes of communication. Compression works very well when the entire image is nothing but black pixels :)
Now, this of course won't make a difference, since big companies don't use fax machines, they use fax2email servers, like Hylafax or similar. In most cases they don't even host it, their telco does it for them.
I don't use ANY kind of so called "hardware" solutions. Cisco is overrated, period.
First, it's not a "hardware" solution. It's OLD and OUTDATED hardware with some good NIC in there, and a crappy operating system.
You'll do much better with a Unix server. CISCO rarely runs at wire-speed, but you can get a Unix router to run at wire-speed with just bit of good hardware (That'll be much cheaper than any cisco router).
Same thing for Dell, HP and other overpriced servers. Build your own, and you'll get exactly the same for a much better price (or something much better for exactly the same money if you prefer).
I've had to make my own baluns to replace existing ones that broke in the middle of the night (or on a weekend) several times. (Back when E1s where more popular, now everybody is getting SIP trunks).
After the hosting company I worked for got an old an outdated server cracked, with hundreds of websites defaced, and we found out that the backup tapes were fried, I wrote a perl script to recover most files from the google cache :). They had only defaced all index.html files ... some sites got PHP files replaced with static versions, but it fixed 99% of our issues.
Fucking stupid gringo. Why the fuck are you assuming that we have less freedom on the internet outside the US?
That's the kind of us-centric thought that is keeping your population stupid, and that gives all of us a reason to laugh at you guys constantly.
I live in Argentina. I pay 24 dollars for 4 MB (Cable), and I have absolutely no restrictions whatsoever. And I live in a small town (700.000 inhabitants). I also pay less than 30 dollars for unlimited 3G. When I say unlimited, I mean it. I trafficked a bit over 30GB on my 3G last month, and I torrent 24/7 on my home connection.
So STFU and open up your mind. There is a world outside of the US, and it doesn't look like North Korea.
Dude, It's 4chan. Have you ever been on /b/?
Here is what happens: Anon comes in with a novelty idea, /b/tards join in "just for the lulz". Then, new Anon (oldfag Anon is a cold, merciless beast. newfag Anon is the conscious, moral, cause-oriented joke of the internet) puts a tag on it and says they are doing it for X. I mean, some said they did the Habbo raids to fight racism. They also said they did project chanology to protect the victims of Scientology. Bullshit, they did it for the lulz.
Of course, DDoSing, Raiding, IRL stalking, etc, are fucking funny, and if it happens to overlay with a good cause, even better. Let them have fun, and bring them down while they are at it.
But in this case, it's pretty obvious that Anon had nothing to do with Amazon Europe going down. Anon is nothing but a bunch of script kiddies, and they don't have the sophistication nor the combined bandwidth to bring down Amazon with a ddos attack.
arnaged some in other countries though :-)
Like most in Latin America during the 70's. It was called Operation Condor by the CIA.
So, what, that makes you proud or something?
And, since you were wondering, between '73 and '82 around 30.000 people where killed ... well, "disappeared".
Now, explain how does changes our freedoms almost 40 years later? The people responsible for those massacres are in jail. Well, not all of them, Nixon and Ford, as well as many CIA jackals are outside our jurisdiction.
No, intelligent design should be thought in psychology class, because it's nothing but a mental disease.
I didn't say that they couldn't "say" what they wanted, I say they couldn't push their agenda. There is a huge difference between expressing your opinion, and brainwashing thousands of people into believing that a zombie-jew from outer space is the messiah, using that power to become powerful and rich, and then using that power to play the system into allowing your brainwashing techniques to be used in public education.
Freedom of speech should always be a first priority, but it stops at that. Brainwashing millions of people is not freedom of speech. Religion is not freedom of speech, it's a crime against humanity.