It is conceivable they are practicing for doing this over foreign cities, which obviously they can't do in training. Yes, they could paint lines in the desert, but that won't exactly provide the same setting as a city drenched in neon and full of tall buildings at night, would it? The police are involved, but then they would have to be if distractions such as these are happening in a crowded city - I've not seen it written anywhere that the police are actually practicing the same thing as the military.
I'm the first one to doubt the intentions of the US military, but there really are simple explanations for this which first have to be discounted before leaping to the conclusion that it is planning for attacks on US citizens at home. That's what critical thinking is all about.
So you are attempting to redress the balance by being unbalanced yourself? That is not how adults do these things. Your hard-on for Boeing is getting in the way.
The system will always fail some people. The question is - how deadly do you want the failures to be? Yes, weapons can always be found, but the time taken to construct and deploy a weapon is directly proportional to it not being used - the longer a person needs to be deadly, the more chance they will either cool off or be stopped.
Viruses live longer inside the body than outside, and so if a person is immunised against a particular virus, the time they can transmit it is reduced significantly. It's not a case of the immunisation making a person an incompatible target for the virus, but the immunisation making the person's body a place the virus simply can't exist in any dangerous form for a substantial length of time.
Of course, as the US has over 300m people. Compare it to the EU, for example, which is a more comparable size, and you realise that the US is not ahead.
Maybe they didn't like drilling because of the ecological damage drilling causes? If it were gravy they were drilling for, they'd still feel the same. Stop looking at things so simplistically. It's really not helping you look rational.
California is socially liberal and fiscally conservative. It has little to do with Hispanics and Asians, just Californians in general being Californian in their outlook.
Slashdot Mirror
The receiver doesn't have to know from where the signal originates, so a simple detector of the used wavelength would suffice.
You are so very ignorant. No wonder you are online arguing against socialised health care. You poor fool.
It is conceivable they are practicing for doing this over foreign cities, which obviously they can't do in training. Yes, they could paint lines in the desert, but that won't exactly provide the same setting as a city drenched in neon and full of tall buildings at night, would it? The police are involved, but then they would have to be if distractions such as these are happening in a crowded city - I've not seen it written anywhere that the police are actually practicing the same thing as the military.
I'm the first one to doubt the intentions of the US military, but there really are simple explanations for this which first have to be discounted before leaping to the conclusion that it is planning for attacks on US citizens at home. That's what critical thinking is all about.
It's actually called SIS, not MI6.
Like, say, the amount of CO2? Honest question.
Grow up.
Likely won't affect the future success? That's wonderfully optimistic. Wonderfully. Every single 787 sold in the world is now grounded.
So you are attempting to redress the balance by being unbalanced yourself? That is not how adults do these things. Your hard-on for Boeing is getting in the way.
The system will always fail some people. The question is - how deadly do you want the failures to be? Yes, weapons can always be found, but the time taken to construct and deploy a weapon is directly proportional to it not being used - the longer a person needs to be deadly, the more chance they will either cool off or be stopped.
Viruses live longer inside the body than outside, and so if a person is immunised against a particular virus, the time they can transmit it is reduced significantly. It's not a case of the immunisation making a person an incompatible target for the virus, but the immunisation making the person's body a place the virus simply can't exist in any dangerous form for a substantial length of time.
The "wiped off the map" quote is not correct. It would help your argument if you didn't repeat nonsense.
Teaching a child that the scientific method doesn't work is not "education" by any stretch of the word. It's lying.
It doesn't need to launch from the Equator.
It would help you to understand what you're talking about before attempting to shit on it.
Luckily the people working on this aren't as arrogant as you and your gut.
It does have a pilot, just not in the craft itself.
Of course, as the US has over 300m people. Compare it to the EU, for example, which is a more comparable size, and you realise that the US is not ahead.
Maybe they didn't like drilling because of the ecological damage drilling causes? If it were gravy they were drilling for, they'd still feel the same. Stop looking at things so simplistically. It's really not helping you look rational.
California is socially liberal and fiscally conservative. It has little to do with Hispanics and Asians, just Californians in general being Californian in their outlook.
You know next to nothing about Germany, it seems. Thanks for making that painfully obvious.
NK would call SK out for doing that, and quite rightly so. There are ways to help, and actively pissing NK is not one of them.
Grow up.
That is assuming you know all the available access methods...
Add in the Galaxy S2 numbers, and things start to look a bit different. Add in *all* Samsung's models, and you can barely see the iPhones.
That thing is a joke compared to the stylus thing on the note.