If you think that sums up the complexities of the area and the actors involved you have absolutely nothing of value to give to this discussion. You not only clearly don't understand why there is conflict in the region, you don't understand why external help might not always be welcome. It's incredible you are so secure in your lacking knowledge that you thought it delightfully pertinent to share just how little you know with the rest of us. Thanks for that, I guess.
I wouldn't put it past you to conjure up fantasies like this. You seem predisposed to casting a superficial glance over a subject and then turning any analysis over to your prejudices to do the hard work. You've made that patently clear with your smearing of over 1.6 billion people because of the actions of a tiny portion thereof.
Rational people use evidence, not guesswork, in order to learn about and understand the world.
And again you use your arbitrary definitions and time frames to demonstrate your arguments like a scared child trying to explain why it's not their fault they stole a cake. You are a pathetic excuse for a sentient being - you have handed over your critical thinking to others, and you chose those others poorly. Now their inane ideas are reflecting on you, and you look like a simpering fool dribbling out obvious nonsense because to do otherwise would break what's left of your frail, dusty, lazy heart.
And 620,000 died in the US civil war, so I guess Christians are a bunch of vicious twats. See how your ridiculous "logic" works? You've obviously made up your mind and are searching for evidence to bolster it. You can't find any, so you stoop to simple numbers without context, as that's the best weapon you've got. You're like an intellectual ISIS - all bluster, no sense, and destined for the same future - despised obscurity.
You have no supporters with accounts, and the ACs who support you all have precisely the same mannerisms as you. That would make a critical mind think your supporters are just you using your (already admitted) ability to make many anonymous posts to Slashdot.
That you think anyone would be fooled by that speaks more of you than anyone else - clearly you are not that bright if such an obvious ploy sounds like a good idea to you.
You are priceless, but you need so much help it's not even funny. Watching your slow decline over the years from relevant posts under actual usernames to bizarre sockpuppetry, harassment, and childish tantrums is incredibly moving. I feel nothing but sorry for you.
Your car doesn't, either. You have to find parking when you get there. Not to mention you can't have a drink when you are there. Who the fuck wants to drive to Paris and not have a drink?
Yes, we know you love your cars. Other people love living their lives more, hence them travelling by train.
Abject nonsense. I'm sure it makes you feel better, but it's clearly insane to try to reason that point. Either you are right, or the experts are right. I wonder which is more likely...
That might be the case where you live - in more civilised countries there is not such a conflict of interest: those who set the speed limits don't get the money from the tickets.
It's amazing that someone has to ask such an obvious question. Hint: it's called "civilization", and we all benefit from more people having more education. Study after study has shown this.
You did, when you said that the reason they only taught capitalism was because that was the system they lived under. It was then pointed out that they lived not only under capitalism, and then you seemed to have lost the plot.
I can't believe I just read that in the 21st century. It's staggering that you think that. It's not "PC" to say what you did because it's fucking ridiculous. Women know the risks, but that doesn't in any way excuse anyone who thinks it's fine to just go raping people. Women shouldn't have to tame their behaviour because some guys can't handle it. That's the thinking in fundamentalist religious communities where women have strict dress codes.
"Waaah waaah high population density". That is nonsense. There are plenty of sparsely-populated countries with fantastic internet access. The "population density" argument is abject nonsense.
In precisely the same way "cars" are unmitigated bullshit pushed by car manufacturers? Obviously not. The "Internet of things" is just a name for putting devices ('things') on the internet, and having them all talk to each other to perform tasks. You not liking how a term is used, or that businesses are selling products to people under such a term, does not automatically make the term bullshit. You're going to have to actually put up an argument if you want to look less APK-y.
Or that those places you list have been subjected to massive violence, and they just want the safest lives possible for their families, a desire we all understand. It's almost as if you don't consider them human beings...
Your understanding of recent history is laughable. It amazes me that you didn't choke to death on your keyboard while attempting to type that. Wow. Simply incredible.
You are a terrible human being. Seriously. You can't even see the nonsense in your posts. Racial or religious profiling doesn't work. What you are pushing for is intelligence-based profiling, which is something entirely different. The fact you don't understand the difference speaks volumes.
If you think that sums up the complexities of the area and the actors involved you have absolutely nothing of value to give to this discussion. You not only clearly don't understand why there is conflict in the region, you don't understand why external help might not always be welcome. It's incredible you are so secure in your lacking knowledge that you thought it delightfully pertinent to share just how little you know with the rest of us. Thanks for that, I guess.
I wouldn't put it past you to conjure up fantasies like this. You seem predisposed to casting a superficial glance over a subject and then turning any analysis over to your prejudices to do the hard work. You've made that patently clear with your smearing of over 1.6 billion people because of the actions of a tiny portion thereof.
Rational people use evidence, not guesswork, in order to learn about and understand the world.
You are real name is...
Hardly the writing of a sound mind...
NURSE! He's out of bed again!
Do you see anyone else on Slashdot posting such childish, petty nonsense? No? That should tell you something.
And again you use your arbitrary definitions and time frames to demonstrate your arguments like a scared child trying to explain why it's not their fault they stole a cake. You are a pathetic excuse for a sentient being - you have handed over your critical thinking to others, and you chose those others poorly. Now their inane ideas are reflecting on you, and you look like a simpering fool dribbling out obvious nonsense because to do otherwise would break what's left of your frail, dusty, lazy heart.
And 620,000 died in the US civil war, so I guess Christians are a bunch of vicious twats. See how your ridiculous "logic" works? You've obviously made up your mind and are searching for evidence to bolster it. You can't find any, so you stoop to simple numbers without context, as that's the best weapon you've got. You're like an intellectual ISIS - all bluster, no sense, and destined for the same future - despised obscurity.
You have no supporters with accounts, and the ACs who support you all have precisely the same mannerisms as you. That would make a critical mind think your supporters are just you using your (already admitted) ability to make many anonymous posts to Slashdot.
That you think anyone would be fooled by that speaks more of you than anyone else - clearly you are not that bright if such an obvious ploy sounds like a good idea to you.
You are priceless, but you need so much help it's not even funny. Watching your slow decline over the years from relevant posts under actual usernames to bizarre sockpuppetry, harassment, and childish tantrums is incredibly moving. I feel nothing but sorry for you.
Your car doesn't, either. You have to find parking when you get there. Not to mention you can't have a drink when you are there. Who the fuck wants to drive to Paris and not have a drink?
Yes, we know you love your cars. Other people love living their lives more, hence them travelling by train.
Abject nonsense. I'm sure it makes you feel better, but it's clearly insane to try to reason that point. Either you are right, or the experts are right. I wonder which is more likely...
The vast majority of those were German citizens.
Stop trying to look for reasons to get upset about people being upset with racism. It makes you look like a complete ass.
You can stream PS4 games to your mobile phone & other devices too...
That might be the case where you live - in more civilised countries there is not such a conflict of interest: those who set the speed limits don't get the money from the tickets.
So it wasn't about slavery but about succession (which was about slavery). Gotcha..!?
It's amazing that someone has to ask such an obvious question. Hint: it's called "civilization", and we all benefit from more people having more education. Study after study has shown this.
Heh. "Right history" he says, without a shred of irony.
You did, when you said that the reason they only taught capitalism was because that was the system they lived under. It was then pointed out that they lived not only under capitalism, and then you seemed to have lost the plot.
I can't believe I just read that in the 21st century. It's staggering that you think that. It's not "PC" to say what you did because it's fucking ridiculous. Women know the risks, but that doesn't in any way excuse anyone who thinks it's fine to just go raping people. Women shouldn't have to tame their behaviour because some guys can't handle it. That's the thinking in fundamentalist religious communities where women have strict dress codes.
You are living in the past.
"Waaah waaah high population density". That is nonsense. There are plenty of sparsely-populated countries with fantastic internet access. The "population density" argument is abject nonsense.
In precisely the same way "cars" are unmitigated bullshit pushed by car manufacturers? Obviously not. The "Internet of things" is just a name for putting devices ('things') on the internet, and having them all talk to each other to perform tasks. You not liking how a term is used, or that businesses are selling products to people under such a term, does not automatically make the term bullshit. You're going to have to actually put up an argument if you want to look less APK-y.
We have the technology for 5Gbps connections, so why not let people use them if they want? They're not taking anything from you.
Or that those places you list have been subjected to massive violence, and they just want the safest lives possible for their families, a desire we all understand. It's almost as if you don't consider them human beings...
"We"? You must be pretty old. Unless, that is, you are attempting to take partial credit for what others did... How wonderfully classy.
Your understanding of recent history is laughable. It amazes me that you didn't choke to death on your keyboard while attempting to type that. Wow. Simply incredible.
You are a terrible human being. Seriously. You can't even see the nonsense in your posts. Racial or religious profiling doesn't work. What you are pushing for is intelligence-based profiling, which is something entirely different. The fact you don't understand the difference speaks volumes.