My take on that scene is that the parachute lines are elastic. So, there was a force pulling Ryan (Bullock) toward the stations which was inverse to the force repelling Matt (Clooney) away. When Matt unhooks, Ryan is pulled back by the elastic force. Matt judged that the rope wouldn't support his and Ryan's weight, that's why he unhooked.
You should try it on the cloud. Amazon's EC2 crunching data from S3.
There are many study cases available. Yup, it is no silver bullet, but has its uses.
You are forgetting the solution already running on this TiVo and Youtube era:
Product Placement.
Now, as they know we will skip a Coca-Cola ad, they make Rachel (Jennifer Anniston) drink it on Friends.
(Is it obvious I don't see TV series anymore;)) ??
It's not MY fault if YOUR business model doesn't work.
If it is not an intranet/private/password-protected site, and it is located in the public internet, I can access it the way I want.
For example, if I surf a site with my cellphone browser configured not to display images... Am I also "stealing" the website owner as I don't see their ads?
Oh well! So, the user wouldn't see the response "you have spyware", BUT are least we are blocking the bot running in his PC...
Well, we are just going back to square one, I guess;-) ?
I think you don't get my point.
So, you are supposing step "1" as a given. What if the user ONLY uses the e-mail provided by his office, ISP. Using outlook, thunderbird, mail2web.com??? Not every body uses free webmail accounts. You are supposing too much into it.
MAYBE... what you would suggest is blocking all traffic from a suspecting PC. That could be done at the ISP level... or as you have suggested "major websites" level. (then it would become a Pariah station?)
But for that, EVERYBODY in the internet would have to agree... (ok, at least the major players.) That would'nt be realistic.
So, hotmail (msn servers) will PUSH a webpage to the clueless user PC? Even if that is possible... what if the browser is closed? Is it possible to spawn a browser? No man, it can't be done.
Messages are mementos, they can be preserved. Also you can easily "talk in background" asynchronously with someone while doing something else (doing the homework, cleaning the house, eating, etc.)
Yes, if you are stupid enough to go to a phishing site without having done all three of these, then yes, you are indeed a fool.
That's why your advice of "everybody filling in crap information" wouldn't work, as only geeky ones could handle that. There should be a big load of false information in order to make the scammers' work a waste of time.
But even in that case... I don't see how could that help. Anyways, they could automatically/massively validate the information they collect, or am I missing something?
Slashdot Mirror
Interesting, thanks. (I'm ecuadorian, btw).
Not that I doubt what you've said but, source?
My take on that scene is that the parachute lines are elastic. So, there was a force pulling Ryan (Bullock) toward the stations which was inverse to the force repelling Matt (Clooney) away. When Matt unhooks, Ryan is pulled back by the elastic force. Matt judged that the rope wouldn't support his and Ryan's weight, that's why he unhooked.
Nowhere it says Zuckerberg closed his account so that he couldn't be tracked.
They have invented this nifty thing called "the Google", you know?
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=netflix+prize
You should try it on the cloud. Amazon's EC2 crunching data from S3.
There are many study cases available. Yup, it is no silver bullet, but has its uses.
You are forgetting the solution already running on this TiVo and Youtube era: ;)) ??
Product Placement.
Now, as they know we will skip a Coca-Cola ad, they make Rachel (Jennifer Anniston) drink it on Friends. (Is it obvious I don't see TV series anymore
Do you honestly think the masses use Firefox? The geek-enough to use Firefox, also are more likely to use AdBlock.
Before Google, there was... EXCITE!!!!
Obama is the "President-elect". So, Bush wasn't "elect"? Oh, wait...
http://begthequestion.info/
YHBT HAND
If it is not an intranet/private/password-protected site, and it is located in the public internet, I can access it the way I want.
For example, if I surf a site with my cellphone browser configured not to display images... Am I also "stealing" the website owner as I don't see their ads?
I cannot decide if you are being serious or sarcastic.
Oh well! So, the user wouldn't see the response "you have spyware", BUT are least we are blocking the bot running in his PC... ;-) ?
Well, we are just going back to square one, I guess
I think you don't get my point. So, you are supposing step "1" as a given. What if the user ONLY uses the e-mail provided by his office, ISP. Using outlook, thunderbird, mail2web.com??? Not every body uses free webmail accounts. You are supposing too much into it. MAYBE... what you would suggest is blocking all traffic from a suspecting PC. That could be done at the ISP level... or as you have suggested "major websites" level. (then it would become a Pariah station?) But for that, EVERYBODY in the internet would have to agree... (ok, at least the major players.) That would'nt be realistic.
So, hotmail (msn servers) will PUSH a webpage to the clueless user PC? Even if that is possible... what if the browser is closed? Is it possible to spawn a browser? No man, it can't be done.
..let's not forget Slashdot's favorite insider: As Seen On TV
Many thought it was the very Steve Jobs... What could have happened with him?
Just for the record: Paul is just mentioning the fact that a group from Corinth is baptizing for the dead, he (neither the Bible) is endorsing it.
enough said.
How could the mails not get to me?
Maybe private conversations. Never happened you have been talking in a group and would like to say something privately to someone in the same room?
Messages are mementos, they can be preserved.
Also you can easily "talk in background" asynchronously with someone while doing something else (doing the homework, cleaning the house, eating, etc.)
That's why your advice of "everybody filling in crap information" wouldn't work, as only geeky ones could handle that. There should be a big load of false information in order to make the scammers' work a waste of time.
But even in that case... I don't see how could that help. Anyways, they could automatically/massively validate the information they collect, or am I missing something?