Slashdot Mirror


User Charged With Taking ISP Tech Hostage

User AttheCoalFac pointed us to an interesting tech support story from Canada. Halifax actress and playwright Carol Sinclair was arrested and is now facing criminal charges after a repairman says she threatened to hold him hostage until he fixed her Internet connection. Mrs. Sinclair denies the allegations and says that she merely stated, 'I don't want to hold you hostage, but would you mind hanging around until the other technician arrives so that the two of you can sort it out.' She was arraigned in Halifax Provincial Court Friday and is now free on conditions including that she have no contact with the repairman or any employee from her ISP. Having a lot of experience on both sides of this issue, I'm not sure who I'm cheering for.

327 comments

  1. Misleading title by kenh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Threatened to take him hostage Taking him hostage - the title is misleading.

    Here in US, most repairmen won't leave until you sign for the work, as I understand it. If your not satisfied, don't sign for the job.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Misleading title by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be misleading if the title said that she actually did take the tech hostage; however, that's not what it says. It says that she was charged with doing so, something which did indeed occur.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAICT, the title is completely made up. TFA doesn't specify the charges.

    3. Re:Misleading title by danomac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep, she was charged. You know what they say: "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."

    4. Re:Misleading title by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or rather "Hell hath no fury like a woman denied access to the internet.".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    5. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article actually doesnt say what mrs Sinclair is charged with.

    6. Re:Misleading title by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, that is the common mis-quotation.

      The correct quotation of William Congreve is "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned / Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned."

    7. Re:Misleading title by D.+Taylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. The GP said "You know what they say", not "You know what William Congreve said"..

      In any case, I can see why it is misquoted...

    8. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He quoted it correctly, the common misquotation is "Hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn." I don't know what point you were trying to get at other than being a karma whore.

    9. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the USA. Business in Canada is form before function, unlike down there.

    10. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Here in US, most repairmen won't leave until you sign for the work, as I understand it. If your not satisfied, don't sign for the job.

      I wish it was that easy here (UK), there's often nothing to sign off when it comes to repairing internet/phone etc, you're left completely in the dark as to whats happening as they tend to appear and disappear at free will without telling you, and most times the work won't be completed when they leave.

      On another note: SLASHDOT STOP FUCKING STICKING THIS IDLE SHIT ON THE FRONT PAGE!! If your marketing people insist on having a /. that's the same as digg don't shove in my face dammit, I can come to idle if I want, I just don't want it's pile of crap infecting my rss fead!!

    11. Re:Misleading title by raynet · · Score: 3, Informative

      On your other note: go to prefs and sections and just disable 'idle' from the main page, simple as that.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    12. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod -1: Smartarse

    13. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my case, if I ever have a customer unwilling to sign the paperwork, I usually call the boss and let them know that the customer is unwilling to sign and/or pay the bill. Now, granted, I don't leave (if the problem isn't resolved) unless I've determined that the problem isn't with our company's products or services. If a technician tries to explain this to the customer and they don't understand/refuse to listen, it's no longer my problem, and let the company handle the further proceedings regarding payment for services rendered. I've got other customers scheduled and don't have time to explain to John Q. Public that he has to pay for my time when I determine that *his* router has died, and he needs to replace it (through us, or another means) and he doesn't think he should pay when I didn't actually make everything magically work.

      I even had a lawyer's office refuse to sign my ticket once, even though the ticket was for $0. Our company offered to *diagnose* something for free, but he thought we were going to *fix* it for free, and became very upset and angry when I told him that we assumed no responsibility for any loss of data that could occur if I tried to remove some software, and would charge our normal rate for data restoration from tape backup. He got angry, called to yell at the owner, then came back and wouldn't sign the ticket (even though he'd have a copy, so it's not like we'd try to charge him for it after the fact). He then decided he needed to escort me off the premesis. The young woman at the front desk sort of laughed at the owner's ridiculousness as I gave her a glance as he sort of scooted me out the door.

    14. Re:Misleading title by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bah, the morons at the ISP heard "hostage" somewhere in the woman's words and overreacted with an hysteria attack.

      People who don't understand more than one word in a sentence are sub-humans. They should be forced to follow courses in understanding, and if they fail* be made unable to replicate, lest their stupidity genes carry on polluting humanity.

      And organizations that overreact in that kind of way should be heavily fined too. Until they understand that stupid hysteria is a threat to humanity.

      * : bold typeface, so that the same kind of idiots who might dwell here have a better chance of reading that part of the sentence

      --
      Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
    15. Re:Misleading title by mccabem · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. If that's really how it works in your region/locality that's great, but that's as rare as a four-leaf clover - something like the telecoms would put on a TV ad.

      More realstically and generally, I'd say 90% of that determination is based on what company they work for, the other 10 on the tech involved.

      To name names, Verzion (nee NYNEX, Bell Atlantic, C&P Telco, SNET, etc) is and always has been the worst of the worst. *If* they show up in the first place to a service call, which if it's 1pm or later you have a FAT CHANCE, they will leave you hanging with a busted T1 without a second thought. And trust them you're OK with being down all night and all the next morning until another tech decides to show up. Didn't you spend extra on a backup line???? Heh. :-|

      Three cheers for monopoly businesses!

      In fairness, if we were talking about Bell South or the old Southwestern Bell (but no so much the new SBC) the numbers work out much more favorably - perhaps even flipped to 10/90. Except in the most extreme circumstances where it was much more understandable for the repair time to be extended (e.g. major flood), we'd never have something down more than the 4hr MTTR.

      In either case, it's possible to get a tech that just likes doing their job even if they work for an ass company - that always rocks, but like playing the lottery is a little hard to count on.

      -Matt

    16. Re:Misleading title by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Discussion about women isn't rocket science. (yes, I know, wrong William Congreve)

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    17. Re:Misleading title by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Our society is built upon people who can't get other jobs doing the jobs that no one else wants. In this case, you'd hope that other people could be an ISP technician, but your suggestion would be impossible even if it weren't horribly elitist. With rare exception, college graduates don't want to clean toilets for a living.

    18. Re:Misleading title by grizdog · · Score: 1

      Please mod the parent as funny. Look up Congreve Rockets if you have to.

    19. Re:Misleading title by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      What,are you kidding? trying to figure it the right answer is ten times worse than rocket science! I swear when they ask "what do you think of this outfit?" I feel like the guy given the choice of cutting the red wire or blue wire in an action movie. One wrong move,and BOOM!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re:Misleading title by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your going about it all wrong. If the girl is your friend or a relative, just say "I'm not really the one your should be asking about that, I'm biased that I have a beutiful familiy and friends and don't think an outfit could change that."

      If the girl is a good friend but not a intimate friend like a girlfriend or wife, just say, "You always look good to me but I don't want to start pimping you out or thinking of you in that way, you should ask someone else."

      Now, if it is a girlfriend or wife, you simply state, "I don't think my opinion would be too objective, it would have to be a really ugly outfit for me not to think it looks good on you and that might not be the opinion your looking for".

      If course you could always avoid the issues altogether and get pictures of the most hideous outfits you can find and tell your ol' lady that you think she might make it look good. If she has any fashion sense, she will never ask your opinion on an outfit again.

      Now, if you need advice on the "does this make me look fat" question, well, your better off just acting like you couldn't hear her instead of ever answering her.

      Either way, the goal is to not answer her an avoid the BOOM while making her not want to ask you in the future.

    21. Re:Misleading title by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your advice, while appearing sound at first glance, has one fatal flaw - women are far from logical about these things. Yes, I'm married. No, your advice does not work.

    22. Re:Misleading title by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      But, but, but; if you make everyone unable to replicate, the human race will cease to exist!

      </humor>

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    23. Re:Misleading title by UNKN · · Score: 0

      Pay me enough and I'd clean toilets.

    24. Re:Misleading title by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm divorced but it worked for me.

      At least I think it did. Now you got me thinking to why I'm divorced. Damn, why couldn't I have talked to you earlier before it cost me half of everything.

    25. Re:Misleading title by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I have found that honesty is the best policy. The trick is that you have to be honest from the get go. If she asks you if the outfit looks good, and it doesn't, say 'No'. If she gets upset, you just challenge her with 'What? You want me to lie to you about your outfit?'

      Of course, if you do lie to your wife about stuff, then you have already screwed yourself, because she will rightfully assume that you are just trying to be an ass. After all, if you don't have any problems lying to her, why would you choose now to be honest?

    26. Re:Misleading title by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Fail.

      You forgot to figure in women with brains.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    27. Re:Misleading title by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you +1 Insightful if I had mod points and hadn't already posted... This is quite true.

    28. Re:Misleading title by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that's the rub. The pay for cleaning toilets is relatively low (compared to lots of white-collar work) because anyone can do it. There's far more supply for custodial work than there is demand, and the supply and demand curve compensates.

    29. Re:Misleading title by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, it's probably a lot more useful than most white-collar work, too. So why does it pay less?

      Call me cynical, but I am convinced half the people in white-collar work are only there to make the jobs of the other half more difficult.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    30. Re:Misleading title by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the best way to reply is with 'Hell yeah, I'd hit it!' It's doesn't necessarily provoke the best reaction, but it's pretty consistent, and in situations that break consistency the result is generally pretty awesome.

    31. Re:Misleading title by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. I had an ex who had a completely different sense of style than I prefer - huge, ugly glasses, loud clothes, etc. She'd always ask me how I look, and I'd always be non-commital, which would result in her getting angry with me for not giving her a straight answer. Finally I said 'look, I hate those glasses, I think they look stupid, and your hoodie is so loud it hurts my eyes. I hate the shit you're wearing, but it's whether you like it that matters.'

      It still doesn't get me out of the 'help me pick an outfit' bullshit, but at least it's a start.

    32. Re:Misleading title by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Discussion about women isn't rocket science.

      Well, I did date a rocket scientist for several years...

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    33. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said, it pays less because more people can do it, not because it's any less valuable. As long as those useless white-collar jobs are in demand, and we've got more people than jobs, custodial work will pay less.

    34. Re:Misleading title by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Dude, chill out!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    35. Re:Misleading title by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      Wonderfully sound logic. If it were to be applied to a man, I'd recommend it to my friends.

      Women, however, are creations of emotion, not logic. They WILL interpret your non-response as not WANTING to respond, and then will immediately ask themselves WHY you don't want to respond, and come to the conclusion that you don't want to respond because you actually think they are fat/ugly/etc, and then she will open the gates of hell and shed her wrath upon you.

      The correct response to "Does this make me look fat?" is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, "NO", or better yet, be on your toes and hit her with a pre-emptive "Have you lost weight? No? That outfit wears well on you then" when she walks out of the bedroom.

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
    36. Re:Misleading title by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Personally I go with Bill Cosby's policy of "No-No-Yes". Turn the first two outfits down and approve the third, regardless of what they are. She'll get a decision and you'll give the impression that you actually care, thus getting you off the hook.

    37. Re:Misleading title by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, it's probably a lot more useful than most white-collar work, too. So why does it pay less?

      Call me cynical, but I am convinced half the people in white-collar work are only there to make the jobs of the other half more difficult.

      If only 5 people in the world can do your job, and everyone wants to employ you, you can pretty much set your own wage.

      If on the other hand, there a 5 billion people who can learn to scrub toilets when presented with a 5 minute training video, and only 1 billion jobs available--well, you don't get to set your wage. Learn a better-paying skill.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    38. Re:Misleading title by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Learn a better-paying skill

      This is my point exactly. What if everyone DID learn a better-paying skill? You still need 1 billion people to scrub toilets.

      What you suggest "learn a better paying skill" or "get an education" is really no a solution to the problem of low-wage work. Just because one individual moves up to something better doesn't make that job go away. All they've done is shifted the situation to someone else.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    39. Re:Misleading title by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      This is my point exactly. What if everyone DID learn a better-paying skill? You still need 1 billion people to scrub toilets.

      What you suggest "learn a better paying skill" or "get an education" is really no a solution to the problem of low-wage work. Just because one individual moves up to something better doesn't make that job go away. All they've done is shifted the situation to someone else.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but if one person learns a better-paying skill and leaves their job for a higher-paying one that requires their new skill--well, that leaves fewer people who want to perform the low-wage/low-skill job. That increases demand.

      Now the guy who left for a higher-paying job could always go back to the low-wage job if he had to fall-back because of job cuts or a flood of people who go out and get that new skill. But the low-wage guy can't really fall back to anything.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  2. I've had some shitty experiences by Johnny+Doughnuts · · Score: 1

    I've had some shitty experiences with Aliant employees as I'm from Halifax, but nothing that would drive me that far. Christ.

  3. Seems to me by jaxtherat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is just a case of a disgruntled customer's remarks being taken WAY out of context.

    --
    http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    1. Re:Seems to me by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You are right - taken out of context to try to teach someone that pisses them off a lesson at taxpayers expense and perhaps get a cash windfall. It's just as ridculous as the photographer that claimed he was beaten up by an Icelandic girl that is barely over three feet tall.

    2. Re:Seems to me by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the problem is we don't know what she said.

      there are 3 versions of the truth here, her version his version and what really happened.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    3. Re:Seems to me by urban_warrior · · Score: 1

      I stole it now pay up the $500 and you can have it back

    4. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having been an on-site tech for a cable company, a DSL company, and a multi-service ISP; I can assure you that customers do think that they can prevent a technician from leaving if the service isn't working to their satisfaction. I've responded in a number of different ways to customers. Here are some of the ways I've managed to vacate the premise:

      1. Explain that the issue is elsewhere and that preventing me from leaving will only prolong their outage.
      2. Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it.
      3. Offer to permanently close their account, remove the equipment, and blacklist their address/company/name (this only works if you are friends with the owner of the ISP, which I am)
      4. Last resort - offer to remove some of their blood through an entirely new orifice that I will create.

      #1 and #2 are usually effective and will get you out the door
      #3 I've used twice (one resulted in the closure of the account)
      #4 I've used once (electricians scissors are truly multi-purpose)

      The key is to remain cold and unemotional when delivering your chosen line. #4 requires having the scissors in your hand.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    5. Re:Seems to me by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there are 3 versions of the truth here, her version his version and what really happened.

      That would imply that all three are true. I prefer the B5 variation: "Understanding is a three-edged sword. Your side, their side and the truth."

      Of course sometimes it is just a matter of perception and all are equally "true" in that sense, but most of the time not...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "customer's remarks being taken WAY out of context."

      In other news, a missing pizza delivery boy and 2 mailmen were found in Ms. Sinclair's basement and freed after explaining to police they had somehow gotten lost and ended up there.

    7. Re:Seems to me by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      #4 can get you shot. You can't claim they started it if you're dead with a pair of scissors in your cold dead fingers.

      --
      I hate printers.
    8. Re:Seems to me by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Oh come on now, you must be American ;-) If she didn't have a gun pointed at the kid, or a knife at his throat, then it's obvious that she wasn't being serious. If she did, then why wasn't a weapon mentioned in the report? That would be a pretty important piece of information, wouldn't you say?

      The kid seems like he's been living in his parents' basement watching too many episodes of Criminal Minds, IYKWIM.

    9. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Scissors = tool of the trade in my hand

      If someone is willing to take it that far for an internet connection; I'm in a bad position from the moment I step in the door. There are some scary people out there, no doubt, but I don't let anyone get away with trying to intimidate me.

      The day a gun gets pulled on me, I'll be taking a piece of that person with me.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    10. Re:Seems to me by William+Robinson · · Score: 1

      Somewhere I read

      To be happy with a man, you must understand him a lot and love him a little.

      To be happy with a woman, you must love her a lot and not try to understand her at all.

      The technician obviously did a mistake.

    11. Re:Seems to me by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yea but I have a lower UID than you, so ner.

      --
      I hate printers.
    12. Re:Seems to me by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when by her own admission, she seems to think it relevant to mention that she doesn't usually drink Vodka Cooler so early in the day, and that she didn't drink that much of it in the first place. Don't expect many Judges to believe her until her blood results come back from the lab.

    13. Re:Seems to me by Indras · · Score: 1

      Let's not start this again.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    14. Re:Seems to me by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      How exactly did they prevent you from leaving? Even if they were dancing around in front of you blocking your escape I would think picking up your cell phone and starting to dial the police is the one method that always works (and is what the tech in this case should have done if he weren't such a crybaby).

    15. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      What I generally hear is something like "You're not leaving until this is fixed." Those cases get response 1, 2 or 3.

      Only once has someone stood in front of the door and told me that I wasn't leaving. Scissors in hand, I informed them "You can't stop me."

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    16. Re:Seems to me by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I did on-site PC repair work when the real customers weren't footing my expected life style back in the day. *MOST* of the time I was in a nice dentist's office, a school, something like that, or doing work in my shop. I tried to consolidate the in-home work to one day a week near the end of it and, near the end of it, I always brought a compact firearm and the kid I'd hire from the tech school nearby.

      They'd wait in the truck most of the time or they'd stand near the door "looking busy." There were some (many) exceptions. (It is a small state and a very small town that I worked out of.) During those times they'd be right there with me, the customer, and the customer's family. We'd all opine and we'd have a great time. There are, on the other hand, a small percentage of people who are fucking crazy.

      Sorry for the language but they are fucking crazy. There are no other words for it. Just plain fucking nuts. There... That is the only other way to explain them.

      I have had them break down and cry because the PC repair was either too expensive to complete, their data was not ever going to be retrieved, or the problem was simply their lack of understanding. Trust me when I say I'd rather spend an additional 2 hours on a site and charge only one to ensure I don't return for the same mistake. I'd rather do that because that means good word-of-mouth and great return business for something that is actually profitable.

      My PFY carried pepper spray and I carried a small .22 and the last one has the business today so I imagine he's got the spray and likely has the .22 as well. (I'm permitted to carry such.)

      The worst situations I have run into were drunk people. There is almost always a peaceful way to deal with them. If not then a glimps of a firearm (that, really, could just barely hurt them enough so that I can get away safely) has always been enough.

      Side note: A firearm in this area is not an abnormal thing.

      (Formatting sucks on idle)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    17. Re:Seems to me by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      there are 3 versions of the truth here, her version his version and what really happened.

      Here is what really happened: first mover advantage. The lady probably insulted a know-it-all 20 year old, who knew that if you are the first one to accuse someone else, then they bare the burden of the defense. She could very well be a bitch, but if the kid is lying and fucking with her life. That's way worse and he'd be the one who deserves some prison time.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    18. Re:Seems to me by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Yes, and #4 can land you in court facing assault charges or a civil complaint, if the customer summons his lawyer or the police. Only the ones determined to get a piece of you will press charges and drain you of time and resources, so you got lucky when you employed the threat.

      A better threat would be informing them they would be committing false arrest.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    19. Re:Seems to me by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which begs the question: If a truth fell down in the middle of a forest, and nobody heard it, would your wife want to have sex with you?

      Or, put another way, if truth were a car traveling down the highway, and were to suddenly be attacked by a mac fanboi in one of Balmer's thrown chairs, would the bad car analogy still allow this post be modded +4 insightful?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    20. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they'll have to clean your brains up off the vinyl wallpaper.

      Are you THAT scared of being told what to do???

    21. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or 5. Just fix the problem. You know what's wrong, you just didn't like the look of her or simply couldn't be bothered, admit it. Jeez, Tech Support are always the same!

    22. Re:Seems to me by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the explanation is much simpler. He noticed he wouldn't get out of there for hours because he can't fix it and she won't let him leave, he's already at the very least 1.5 hours late (after all, he came 1.5 hours late for the appointment) and I'm pretty sure he has one of those contracts where he has to do so and so many tasks a day, no matter whether customer is satisfied or not, as long as the ticket can be closed.

      He saw his daily average plummet, saw he won't be able to fix her computer (whether he is incompetent or she managed to FUBAR her internet settings in an attempt to "fix" the problem herself before he arrived is up for debate), and decided that bailing is better than explaining why he did 3 customers this day instead of his mandatory 6+.

      And to avoid a problem with his supervisor, who would probably question why he doesn't have a signature for the task, he used something we all said to a repairman some day ("you will not go anywhere until this is fixed") as a hostage threat.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Seems to me by sammyF70 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having been an on_site customer of a DSL company, I can assure you that on-site techs do think that they are paid to show up and aren't actually there to make sure the services their employers sells to me are working. Here are how I view the ways they've tried to just end the call/go away without fixing anything :

      1. "Explain that the issue is elsewhere and that preventing me from leaving will only prolong their outage." : "Elsewhere" WHERE?If the problem is not here, you can still call your colleagues, who will fix the thing wherever elsewhere is and you can stay where you are to make sure you actually fixed my problem. THAT is your job.

      2. "Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it." Always a good one : if there was no powersurge (a UPS works wonder to avoid losing equipment to those), no changes in the configuration nor the equipment, and everything has been rebooted and checked just ffs, and it still doesn't work, then saying that it's my equipment is pure BS. Like #1, all you do is push the responsability on someone else. As there is nobody besides me (the customer) and your employer ( which you are paid to represent), there is noone to take the blame, no matter how hard you try.

      3. That's called blackmailing, and might result in a lawsuit against you and your employer.

      4. and I might offer to have your head on a plate and your job down the drain .. depending on how good a customer I am (for your employer)

      The key in getting some sort of service from ISPs is to ask to speak with superiors until you get someone who can't do anything for you directly but will get pissed at his subordinates for passing the call up.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    24. Re:Seems to me by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I've had my share in computer repairs myself, and people here are generally polite. They do get a bit angry, though, when you're the third person they've called in short succession.

      And being "experienced tech" means you get those people more often than others, simply because companies here do care whether they have to send a tech three times to a person. People don't pay for that, the company does.

      So I did have my share of welcomes that went along the lines of "you won't leave 'til that crap works!" And sad as it is, sometimes (not too often, but sometimes) whoever was there before me was simply and utterly clueless, sometimes more so than the person he should help.

      You see, the ISP I worked for simply hired whoever they got cheaply as tech. They got a checklist-approach training and if for any reason something didn't work to checklist, some stated that the customer just "has to wait a few hours", so they can get out the door and complete more customers, instead of fixing the issue. Even if they could. When you pay people by the number of accounts they install, you get that.

      Piece wage does not work in troubleshooting. The only thing the tech will want is a signature and hurry to the next guy. Whether it's really fixed or not, he doesn't care. Actually, NOT fixing it is better for him. It means more work and thus more money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:Seems to me by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      The problem is, we can't know what she said. Her word against his, with apparently no evidence a judge could use to decide who is telling the truth. If only there were a legal principle that says courts aren't supposed to waste their time and our taxes if there's no evidence.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    26. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm what, 666? You're all wrong anyways.

    27. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not.

    28. Re:Seems to me by Artifakt · · Score: 0

      Scissors do not equal a tool of the trade. The moment you make a threat to use them as a weapon, they are a weapon. You're talking about how you won't be intimidated. You're in their home. That means, 90% of the time, they go instinctual mode, feel they have to escalate, to defend their home, so you end up either dead, or charged with murder. You tell the jury the dead homeowner made a verbal threat to keep you there, you look like you are lying and that same jury opts for lethal injection instead of 15 to life. You manage to just wound him, he lies through his teeth, there's forensic evidence of an assault with a deadly in the victim's home to settle the question of who's word can be trusted, and you get 2 to 10. The other 10%, the homeowner does the sensible thing and runs. (What, you're gonna keep them there?). Then the swat team shows up, and you get carried out in a body bag. I don't see any wins for you in that list, nada, zip, zero.
      Oh, and YOU NEED TO BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY, Mr. Internet tough guy.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    29. Re:Seems to me by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Geez, I never thought I'd get to play this game which such a high UID!

      I just didn't have anything to say for a couple of years, so I never registered.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    30. Re:Seems to me by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Youngling!

    31. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're right...I don't use my electricians scissors to cut cat-5 cable, zip ties, butyl, my hand once, and anything else that gets in my way.

      You're the type that would respond to #3. You would feel the burning need to immediately log on to call me "Mr. Internet Tough Guy" on /.

      Go on, tell me how much cooler/smarter/right you are because of your lower-than-mine UID.

      Now, if I had to poke a hole in someone because they attempted to restrain my exit, I'd be making the call to the cops myself. Kill someone in their own home? Surely you jest. I'm talking about opening the eyes of someone who thinks they're going to prevent me from leaving and you're talking about home-invasion and murder.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    32. Re:Seems to me by rezalas · · Score: 1

      actually his UID is lower. just for reference.

    33. Re:Seems to me by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Or, put another way, if
      truth were a car traveling
      down the highway, and
      were to suddenly be
      attacked by a mac
      fanboi in one of
      Balmer's thrown chairs,
      would the bad car
      analogy still allow this
      post be modded +4
      insightful?


      It really depends on if
      the car is being driven by
      Nazis, Natalie Portman or
      by someone who
      measures his mileage
      in rods per hogshead.

      FIX THE WRETCHED
      COMMENT BOX
      ALREADY!!!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    34. Re:Seems to me by adb · · Score: 1

      Way to jump the gun.

    35. Re:Seems to me by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what Kurosawa's Rashomon is about .

      The story of a rape and murder is told from 4 different perspectives,
      all contradictory.
      in the end we are left to determine "the truth".

      --
      music lover since 1969
    36. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the latter it looks like its no longer a philosophical theory. If Slashdot did images I'd take a screen of your +4 Insightful.

    37. Re:Seems to me by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      This is probably closer to what happened.

      The lady gave a good argument about not wanting him to leave until the other tech was there and the thing worked properly. She probably did say something about not wanting to hold the guy hostage but she wants the thing fixed. The Tech falls for it and then gets in trouble for not hiting the rest of his appointments back at the office. He used the holding hostage excuse to explain how desperate she was and why he stayed thinking the customer service end would clear him. The boss probably blew it out of portion in a typicle PHB style and now the tech was stuck telling the police about the situation to save his job,

      Not that this scenario invalidates anything else your said. But I think it probably started off without malice and turned into something more.

    38. Re:Seems to me by romcabrera · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    39. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #3 I've used twice (one resulted in the closure of the account)
      #4 I've used once (electricians scissors are truly multi-purpose)

      I didn't realize that they let you read/post to slashdot from jail. Well, that's one thing to look forward to...

    40. Re:Seems to me by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      It's not that dificult. You fail to fix the connection and resort to #4. The customer's wife, kid, brother, whoever sees you assault him and grabs a gun, you turn to leave which makes him think your about to attack him and now your dead and the shooter is somewhat legally justified with a wounded relative in the house and a dead body that can't explain their own self defense in the first place.

      You wouldn't have been any worse off in that case then any other situation. This is because the shooter only saw you attacking not attempting to leave.

    41. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't claim anything if you're dead...with or without a pair of scissors.

    42. Re:Seems to me by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Precisely. This will probably get thrown out of court for insufficient evidence on either side (he-said-she-said debates are worthless) but it will have wasted everyone's time... and screwed the woman out of internet service in the meantime (assuming one of the techs actually fixed it).

    43. Re:Seems to me by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      He didn't say #4 was "remove some of their blood through a new orifice." He said #4 was "offer to remove some of their blood through a new orifice." There's a HUGE difference.

    44. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good old B5.

    45. Re:Seems to me by nmos · · Score: 1

      Having been an on_site customer of a DSL company, I can assure you that on-site techs do think that they are paid to show up and aren't actually there to make sure the services their employers sells to me are working.

      All too often their job really IS just to do a very specific task and leave. Like many here I've made the mistake of doing contract work for some of the service/warranty companies and it's pretty common for them to send you out with the assurance that they've already diagnosed the problem and sent any needed parts ahead of you. Your job then is just to replace those parts (or maybe test a specific part) and that's it. They won't pay you to do anything else no matter what the real problem turns out to be (of course many of them arn't planning to pay you anyway but that's another story). Bottom line is that these companies are far more interested in technically fulfilling the requirements of their contract than resolving the customer's problem and any tech. that doesn't have their priorities in that order won't be around very long.

    46. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone else start frothing at the mouth with rage when someone misuses the phrase "begs the question"?

    47. Re:Seems to me by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      * Cough *

    48. Re:Seems to me by thegnu · · Score: 1

      Was there a physical threat involved? Was there a weapon?

      How ridiculous. Just SAYING "I'm holding you hostage until the other tech gets here" isn't holding someone hostage. Did he TRY walking out? It's bullshit.

      I hereby hold Canada hostage until I get the money. And I'm not giving up this time, Canada.
      *police knock on door*

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    49. Re:Seems to me by thegnu · · Score: 1

      I'm still working on reading TFA, by the way. But what does "implied she had a gun" mean?

      Either it was stated or it wasn't. Or she said something, or she didn't. For fuck's sake. What did she say?

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    50. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about being a services organization is that we can refuse service to anyone, at any time, for any reason (it's in the contract). The person who lost their account received a full refund and no possibility for future services because she couldn't keep her mouth shut. While I CAN take being called a bastard and piece of shit, I DON'T HAVE TO take it.

      And to your next point, when an individual attempts to hold me against my will, the law is on my side and any action I take in self defense is justified. I will not attempt to take rights away from anyone else (Internet service isn't a right, it is a privilege for those who can afford it) and I expect the same in return.

      I don't particularly look forward to using my scissors (or pen, or hammer, or keyhole saw, or a chunk of LMR-400 cable) on a person, but I am in touch with my inner animal and if you back me into a corner you should prepare to get bit.

      Jail time for me? Surely you jest! I'm a fine upstanding member of society. What are you? Of course, I already know what you are. You're an anonymous coward.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    51. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #4 can get you shot. You can't claim they started it if you're dead with a pair of scissors in your cold dead fingers.

      True, but as long as they don't have a cement basement floor, it probably WOULD get you out of their house!

    52. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      I'm salaried. I'm also level 3 support in my organization. If it doesn't get fixed today, I'm still responsible for it tomorrow. The major problem with some of these people is that they expect instant gratification. When it doesn't go their way they get belligerent and I nip that in the bud. Fortunately, I'm good friends with the owner and I can get away with just about anything.

      If I can't fix it right now, there is a good reason.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    53. Re:Seems to me by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Try putting this in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css :

      form[action=//idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl] #postercomment { width: 99% }

      Since it keys off the action attribute of the form tag before the ID tag selector, it won't mistakenly apply to any other sites.

      The typical rule on the other pages is simply:
      textarea { width: 99% }

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    54. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      My service truck only holds so many parts. I don't typically carry a supply of Cisco routers or even every size of antenna, every type of radio, and every type of main-board we use in our network. I cannot control the telco DSLAM nor can I check the DS3 or T1 cross connects in the meet-me room of my provider.

      There are a number of reasons I might not be able to just "fix-it". 95% of the time, it's a problem with a customer PC and 99% of that time I can fix it (I don't repair hardware that I'm not responsible for).

      Believe me, I would rather not go to a customers house once, much less twice.

      When I arrive to find the internet connection working properly and the problem is with a Frontpage site they're building (although the customer reported that the internet is down) I get a little pissed. I'm pissed at level 1, level 2 and the customer.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    55. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      At least there is one person with a backbone replying to my post. Most of the replies I'm reading think I'm some form of nutjob (I only let people who know me call me that)

      Kudos to you for realizing that this is an aggressive and ugly world and sometimes aggressive ugliness is the appropriate response.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    56. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Thank Buddha! Someone who understands the words I type. I was beginning to think that I typed the message in some strange foreign language that nobody understood.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    57. Re:Seems to me by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Anything in any language (especially English) has a 92% chance of being misunderstood by 57% of the local population... Unless you bash on America and/or religion, of course, and then you get modded +1 Insightful no matter what you say.

    58. Re:Seems to me by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Not really, if I see someone threatening a loved one in our own home, I'm not going to wait until they actually harm them before reacting. And I'm certainly not going to wait for them to harm me when they turn and I think they are coming after myself. He also mentioned having scissor or something in his hand as a weapon.

      At best, the "loved one" backs my story up and it was self defense. At worst assuming they died, it becomes a misunderstanding and an accident. If he is alive, it is his word against mine but when he admits to threatening someone, I would be cleared of malicious intent. A home is your last bastion of safe refuge in the eyes of the law. It gets difficult to blame someone backed into a corner. You can't just harm someone in your home but you can defend it and yourself. Remember, I'm coming from the position that I heard an argument or yelling or something and saw the weapon or the stabbing and picked the gun up in self defense. I'm not talking about being in the same room and shooting the guy because he wants to leave. It is from the perspective of not knowing that he wants to leave which is why he is angry and threatening. Now take gun and replace it with large kitchen knife or base ball bat or whatever other weapon that could be close at hand when the guy turns at you to get out but you don't know his intentions and think he is going to attack you.

    59. Re:Seems to me by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it can get you shot. But you shouldn't be threatening someone that has a gun in their hands anyway.

      If they don't have a gun in their hands, and you have a melee weapon, you pretty much win unless they've had some kind of training.

      Take pizza delivery, for example. If you show up at someone's door with the pizza and they try to prevent you from leaving, you're authorized to use necessary force to free yourself. If you're threatened with a deadly weapon or your life is in danger, you can use deadly force.

      You should NEVER make house calls without some form of self defense. Be it a particularly sturdy pair of scissors that you might have to use, or a can of mace.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    60. Re:Seems to me by Xamot · · Score: 1

      Hi there.

      --
      ?
    61. Re:Seems to me by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it's not a problem to threaten someone. I was just making a distinction between an attack and a threat.

    62. Re:Seems to me by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I don't see why *I* should have to change *MY* browser settings to account for a defect in slashdot's website? What if I am at a different computer?

      While I'm changing the .css, is there a similar tweak to keep the slashdot green on all the sections, rather than that butt-ugly brown on it.slashdot.org?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    63. Re:Seems to me by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The hostname part of the URL (between the "http://" and the "slashdot.org") controls what stylesheet set is applied and can be replaced with any other or omitted entirely.

      You could set up a proxy that will redirect references to any *.slashdot.org request to your preferred domain and its associated appearance.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    64. Re:Seems to me by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      When I arrive to find the internet connection working properly and the problem is with a Frontpage site they're building (although the customer reported that the internet is down) I get a little pissed. I'm pissed at level 1, level 2 and the customer.
       
      Why? I do some occasional tech work for a cable tv/ISP company and they pay me exactly the same amount for a service call. Any service call. They send me a work order, I walk out the door and solve the problem. And collect a flat fee. Doesn't matter if I reboot the customer's computer, change a network card, or just tighten up a loose connection. It's all the same to me. Except that some go faster than others, of course. The five minute jobs sort of make up for the 4-hour jobs.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    65. Re:Seems to me by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      "Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it." Always a good one : if there was no powersurge (a UPS works wonder to avoid losing equipment to those), no changes in the configuration nor the equipment, and everything has been rebooted and checked just ffs, and it still doesn't work, then saying that it's my equipment is pure BS.
       
      I do some occasional tech work for a cable tv/ISP company. A couple of weeks back I borrowed my wife's laptop (I don't have one myself) and took it to a job so I could plug it in and show the customer that the connection was working.
       
      No fight, no problem, not arguments. "Sorry, sir, but this is working. See how I can browse the web? Here's CNN, here's youtube. Looks like it's definitely something with your computer. I don't do computer service work myself, but I can recommend a shop that does good work if you like."
       
      It's really not that difficult to do, and the customer is happy with the service from my end.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    66. Re:Seems to me by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      Having been an on-site tech for a cable company, a DSL company, and a multi-service ISP; I can assure you that customers do think that they can prevent a technician from leaving if the service isn't working to their satisfaction. I've responded in a number of different ways to customers. Here are some of the ways I've managed to vacate the premise:

      I think all of us who've done on-site support for any long period of time know the woes of the frustrated, crazy, silly, stupid or downright insane customers we come across from time to time. Granted it's a small percentage of the userbase but it's significant enough to warrant attention. People unfortunately don't realize that we did not break their ${serviceable_item}, we're just doing our jobs and trying to fix it. Also that I have a life outside of their little world and if and when I'm ready to leave I'll bloody well do so.

      It helps that I'm over six feet tall and slightly heavier than my dad's old football playing weight so I don't get too many physical threats, but nonetheless I've had my fair share and I've always dealt with them swiftly and sharply. As soon as you let the person get the upper hand in the intimidation game the situation can only escalate.

      As to all the theories about second parties, firearms, witnesses, home defence et al. that's just Slashdot rhetoric rearing its ugly head. I'd wager that most people commenting on the subject, as usual, have no first hand experience with the situation are are thusly not qualified to open their yaps. But considering the locale I won't hold my breath. :)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    67. Re:Seems to me by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      Having been an on_site customer of a DSL company, I can assure you that on-site techs do think that they are paid to show up and aren't actually there to make sure the services their employers sells to me are working. Here are how I view the ways they've tried to just end the call/go away without fixing anything :

      1. "Explain that the issue is elsewhere and that preventing me from leaving will only prolong their outage." : "Elsewhere" WHERE?If the problem is not here, you can still call your colleagues, who will fix the thing wherever elsewhere is and you can stay where you are to make sure you actually fixed my problem. THAT is your job.

      The problem will take about 6 hours to rectify. What's for dinner?

      2. "Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it." Always a good one : if there was no powersurge (a UPS works wonder to avoid losing equipment to those), no changes in the configuration nor the equipment, and everything has been rebooted and checked just ffs, and it still doesn't work, then saying that it's my equipment is pure BS. Like #1, all you do is push the responsability on someone else. As there is nobody besides me (the customer) and your employer ( which you are paid to represent), there is noone to take the blame, no matter how hard you try.

      I'm glad you're so well disciplined. I'd like to introduce you to about a dozen (nee, hundred) of my former customers who thought they were level one technical support who would quite helpfully modify everything from their network settings or registry right through wiring setup of the network equipment. Admittedly that's our fault anyways for not selling the higher spec'd customer proof equipment, but I digress.

      3. That's called blackmailing, and might result in a lawsuit against you and your employer.

      I'm reasonably certain I can find something in my TOS that covers threats and intimidation of my employees that will invoke a breech of contract. But hey, you're a lawyer so who am I to judge?

      4. and I might offer to have your head on a plate and your job down the drain .. depending on how good a customer I am (for your employer)

      Of course you're right. I've made a few of those phone calls myself. Bastards at the ISP have no sense of humour.

      "Hey, all I did was imprison the guy for an indeterminate period of time by sealing off the exits and the prick threatened to stab me with his pen. If you don't mind, I'd like you to fax a copy of his termination leter to xxxx...."

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    68. Re:Seems to me by KGIII · · Score: 1

      They are probably people who don't work inside someone else's home. When you are going into an unknown situation with potentially hostile people you should be alert and be concerned for your safety. I am both a Marine (no longer active) and physically adept at self defense. I could, I believe, easily handle a crazy drunk lady with a nail file without harming her. However... I could not safely account for her grandson upstairs with a shotgun in this work of fiction. I have been yelled at, I have had people attempt to push me, I have had one person try to hit me... All while on the job and in the home of a customer. I have never needed to harm anyone in those situations.

      "I know that your data was important to you. If you try to harm me or my employee again I will leave now lower your voice and I'll explain. You can't afford my service fees for the 8 hours worth of work that it would take to maybe get your data back on this computer. What I can do is clone your drive, that is to make a complete copy of it, and give that to you on DVDs so that you can use it with your new computer. That will take me about three hours, I'll charge you just a single hour's labor for it. I can also order you a new motherboard which will be in in about three days, take this back to the shop, and do a repair install on your disk and so long as you didn't use encryption I should be just fine. That process will take about eight hours. I will charge you for all of those hours and the hour I spent diagnosing your problem today. My suggestion is that you save the money and either have me order you a new PC, clone this drive to DVD right here from my laptop right now, and you get a newer, faster, and better system for less money but the choices are up to you to make. If you would like a second opinion here's the numbers for The Geek Squad and my closest to local competition but I am here and can do this for you right now."

      Something like the above is almost always the easiest way to avoid issues. If they have physically tried to harm me prior to this then I'm far more likely to not bother and will just bill them my full hourly rate and leave.

      I would NEVER recommend going into someone's home without a means to ensure your safety. I know that, to some, it sounds extreme. It isn't. There is such a thing as being a responsible person who minimizes risk and does their best for risk avoidance. Having a firearm doesn't alter that. Knowing how to safely use and keep it from getting into the wrong hands is key to my solution.

      There were many places where I'd be comfortable enough to remove my jacket/coat. At that point it was obvious that I was armed and I would sometimes get questions about it. Most of the time those questions where, "What are you packing?" Or, "Can I see it?" Most of those times I knew the people I was with well enough so that they probably already knew I carried. The only time I had an issue was when one lady, single mother - I was actually doing almost charity work for her, said, "My ex had a lot of guns." She looked so fricken scared it was different for me to see. It was painfully obvious that she'd been abused and was scared. She had seen it in the holster, under my coat, as I was re-routing her phone line. I stopped and said I would be a minute and I went out, removed my jacket and holster, put them in the truck and locked it, and went back in and finished the job. She still makes me baked goods a few times a year.

      I guess the moral of the story is that there is nothing wrong with keeping yourself safe or being alert (and prepared to deal with) an unsafe situation where there is potential for bodily harm. The importance is knowing the risks, yourself, and what truly constitutes a risk. In the above situation I was, truly, not at risk and my doing what I did made her feel safe and resulted in PILES of referral calls.

      As for the crowd here, don't forget - a lot of us are old and have been in the trenches for years. I'm sort of retired now (as much as I will ever retire) and have just a hosti

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    69. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      You should re-read #4 of my original post. If you still feel the same, read it again. Repeat until the light bulb comes on.

      Invite someone into your house then try to keep them captive and you call it false arrest? Try kidnapping!

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    70. Re:Seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is such a stupid debate...
      Who ~cares~

      Seriously

    71. Re:Seems to me by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 1

      Mod Up. Best post I've read all night.

    72. Re:Seems to me by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks but I don't do it for the mod points. ;)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    73. Re:Seems to me by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Looks like a "! important" needs to be in there too before the closing brace. Maybe also another rule to force a fixed-width font if you prefer them: part of the reason it is so small is that it's 50 characters wide using a narrow proportional font.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    74. Re:Seems to me by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      If you use the scissors as a weapon, they become a weapon. Threatening with them makes you guilty of assault with a deadly weapon, not some kind of fictional 'assault with a tool of the trade'. It doesn't matter what else you do or don't do with them. That's irrelevant. I own a hunting rifle. If I use it to threaten somebody, it's aggrevated assault, and the fact that the rifle's normal purpose is hunting instead of combat means diddly to a judge.
            It's nice you know all about what type I am, and how I plan to use my UID. What I am is a guy who knows that the moment you give the reasoning "I did it because I won't be intimidated" to a cop, you WILL end up in prison. Until now, you haven't been talking about having to poke a hole because it was the last fallback option, and as far as I can see, you're still not committing to using less potentially lethal methods first. You're not posting about what you would do if he succeeded at restraining you, but if he merely threatened to or attempted it. You're supporting making holes in people because of your reluctance to back down first. I gave you some good advice, advice that if you listen may keep you from serving time. You want to get angry at me for that, you've just proved what low life scum you are. So go to prison, see if I care anymore.
            By this post, you're claiming your saying 'poking a hole in someone', or 'opening their eyes' with a sharp object is somehow different from my responding with terms that describe how that violence will be viewed legally. So just what do you think a cop or a jury will call you trying to poke holes in people? Remember, either you leave him alive and he tells the court his side, or you kill him and he becomes evidence and not a plantiff. There is no 'He's dead, but the grand jury immediately looks at lesser charges than home invasion and homicide.". That alternative doesn't exist. You leave him alive, he's gonna swear he didn't do anything to provoke you. Normally, if he's the home owner and you aren't, the cops will arrest you and not him, barring something very obvious such as severe intoxication. There is nothing you can say, especially if he calls the cops first, but usually even if you do, that ensures the cops will also arrest him and follow up on your counter claim. He's bleeding, they will usually transport him to the hospital and you to jail. You won't be able to make any claim to the cops that would force them to do a blood alcohol test or something that might help you while it's still meaningful. You probably won't even be able to get them to photograph the bruises where he grabbed your arm, unless HE insists on it because he's gonna claim he grabbed you AFTER you started swinging scissors at him. That's most states. Look up the laws for Florida or Texas to see your worst case scenario.

           

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    75. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Not that I look forward to it happening again, but perhaps the future will prove one of us right.

      I gave you some good advice

      Uh...where did you give any advice? You were so busy telling me I should be fired and how I'll live my days in prison or a grave, perhaps you forgot to make your point.

      I'll be betting on myself, as your suggestion is that I back down and allow myself to be restrained. I'll do what is necessary to exit a hostile situation and nothing more.

      Either you're sheep or wolf. I'm not sheep.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  4. Gives a whole new meaning to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vendor lock-in.

    1. Re:Gives a whole new meaning to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me does drumroll

    2. Re:Gives a whole new meaning to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YYYEEEEAAAAHHHH!!!!

  5. Typo by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That should read "Threatened to take him hostage (is not the same as) Taking him hostage - the title is misleading. I had a less than and greater than that were scrubbed out of the final posting - sorry.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a less than and greater than that were scrubbed out of the final posting - sorry.

      Learn how to use HTML dumbass. < < < < < < < < < > > > > > > >

    2. Re:Typo by kenh · · Score: 1

      I know how to use HTML "dumbass" - I simply failed to account for slashdot "scrubbing" my input for "faulty" HTML (I assume it was viewed as an empty tag).

      To think you stayed up so late to add "nothing" to the discussion, Annonymous Coward indeed...

      --
      Ken
  6. What was wrong with her pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What was wrong with her computer?

    I mean, what was it in the end. To go through this whole song and dance just to realize maybe Cat5e patch cord went bad?

    What was so beyond wrong with this computer that took 20 phone calls then to a site visit?

    Are there no local IT company's in the town they can recommend to the women that can fix computers?

    1. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Annoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No doubt there are companies that do computer work. But she would have had to PAY them.
      People don't expect that they might have to actually pay someone to fix their computers after they frak them up.

    2. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by slugstone · · Score: 1

      damn where my mod points?

    3. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They didn't know what was wrong with her internet connection / computer from what I can tell. "There's something wrong with your computer" was just a way to make her go away.

       

      It's sad really all real geeks should love solving problems, but I've worked with loads of people who'll spout some excuse like that even before the customer has explained what's happening. What's even worse is that they do it in a such an obvious way that even non technical people can tell it's bullshit. And it's not like they do anything else instead of work, they just spend a bit more time in idle mode than people who actually try to fix stuff.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by topham · · Score: 1

      Many ISPs will -NOT- fix a customers computer. Why? they don't want the responsibility.

      If they determine the connection itself is fine, well, then the customer can call somebody who works on computers. It is NOT the ISPs responsibility to get the computer working.
      When you call the telephone company because your 3rd party fancy new cordless phone doesn't work, do they fix it, or tell you take it back to where you go it from?

    5. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You're not reading what I said. I think "there's something wrong with your PC" was just something they said rather than interupting their web surfing to investigate.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ide.

      The common answer from ISP is
      ISP: The problem is on your computer.
      ME: Hey, I don't even have ADSL synchronisation and I have checked with two ADSL modem and one ADSL modem/router.
      ISP: Have you checked your ADSL filters on the phone line?
      ME: already done, I have three filters, checked with all combination
      ISP:let's follow procedure.
      ME:whatever.
      20 minutes later
      ISP: OK, there's no problem with your computer. By the way, we effectively
      have a problem in this zone.- since three hours ago. We're working on it
      ME face palms.

    7. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by somersault · · Score: 1

      It isn't his job to fix her computer if the line is working. There's a lot of chance he wasn't a "geek" either, just sounds like a sparky to me. She sounds like a total ass anyway - even though I am a geek, I'm a lot less likely to help someone with their problem unless they keep a rein on their attitude. When it's for work then I'll get round to it, but if it's something that's not a part of my job then I'm very unlikely to do anything. If she had a virus which had disabled all her net access and required a reinstall of Windows to get the components back in working order, do you think a guy trained and paid to check phone lines should have done that for her?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Let's cut this bullshit.

      1. _Again_, the idea was that a lot use the "there's something wrong with your computer" line even when there is _nothing_ wrong with that computer.

      2. Just because the line is fine, it doesn't automatically transfer the problem to her computer. As a trivial example: it's happened to me before that my line _and_ computer were perfectly fine, but one of their routers was down. Or whatever login server they used was down.

      I.e., I do expect whoever is in that support job to at least try to see where the problem is, before using the "it's your computer" line. Maybe, just maybe, it isn't my computer after all.

      3. If they sent a sparky to fix a line which wasn't deffective, then it sounds like massive incompetence on the part of that company anyway. Over here they can check the line and ping the modem, without sending anyone over.

      Furthermore, it sounds like it wasn't the first time they had sent one, and solved nothing. If the first guy plugged in the modem and the line was fine, why was the second (and presumably third and so on) sparky sent to fix the same line?

      4. Yes, it's not the sparky's job to diagnose her computer, but why didn't tech support do that first? I mean, hello? Most ISP's make you go through that "is the cable connected?" list even if you tell them that the modem just caught fire.

      Did these guys really send someone over, i.e., the expensive thing, before making sure it can't be solved the cheap way?

      5. You don't need to send someone over, if a virus had disabled her net access. You just ping the modem from the ISP end.

      Frankly it makes me wonder if there wasn't something wrong with the line after all.

      6. That is actually a pretty poor SF scenario, btw. Viruses would rather use that connection to send more copies of themselves or act as a zombie army, undetected. And if you're going to make yourself obvious and obnoxious big time, just formatting the HDD works better than disabling the network.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    9. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by somersault · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, they had tested the line plenty of times without sending anyone out - it seems they just sent someone out to shut her up (she claims it was because she pretended to be a businessman that they actually sent someone out, perhaps that's true, perhaps not).

      Sounds very much like she's just the type of customer who "thinks she knows everything" and didn't bother listening to any advice they gave her. I don't know what their policy would be, but as you say you'd expect an ISP to go through a cheat-script with you at least.

      I don't consider viruses disabling certain types of network access a SF scenario - one of our MDs has a machine that was pwned and repaired several times a few years ago - it's still running, but just barely. Parts of explorer just have very broken behaviour. He's too paranoid to let me just copy all the data from the machine and scrap it so he still keeps it around to get old files off of occasionally. Some people are just strange, but if they are the ones paying you then what can you do..

      Yes, some companies no doubt have lazy or clueless helpdesk staff, but sometimes it is the customer at fault. There are many, many things that could go wrong to stop someone being able to browse the net, and it should not be the ISPs responsibility to fix the computer. Some ISPs will try to be as helpful as possible, but in the end they have no responsibility for actually making sure your computer is working, just that your line is fine.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I agree, I would have been offering my services or my buddies services being a tech myself, to help this lady out, 1 week tops, not 2 months. This is pathetic on both her part and the ISPs part. I wuold have asked for credit for a service i wasn't able to use.

    11. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by rezalas · · Score: 1

      In ISP world, you have two types of field technicians: Type 1: Knows the job, knows the solutions, doesn't care anymore and just wants to go home. Type 2: Doesn't know the job, is more of a problem, and tries for overtime every day he can. If you are lucky, you end up with a rare breed, a type 3. So rare they aren't worth mentioning, its usually only caused when a Type 1 gets lazy and doesn't buy condoms, so he volunteers for the OT that type 2 normally gets until he can get use that experience to get a better job in a different field. Cable technicians, especially when you operate an ISP, are cycled like water in a bathtub sadly.

    12. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're a textbook example of the sort of passive aggressive behaviour I was talking about.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yep, and I'm not exactly ashamed of it, it's pretty natural. Most people get like that after doing support for any length of time, I'd wager. If people treat you like shit, then it's hardly going to make you more eager to go see them and help them, is it? If I'm not doing anything else I'd go help them, but if I am doing something else then I'm a lot more likely to finish it first before going and helping out, rather than just dropping everything and going to see them (which is a right PITA when you're coding as you lose track of what you were doing).

      I don't think there is any justification for pure helpdesk workers not to be helpful (unless the client is being abusive), but as for the guy who was called out to check the line, it really sounds like it was not his job to fix her PC. After 20 calls to the helpdesk you'd expect that they'd already tested the line and gone through diagnostic steps with her on her computer and came up with the result that it was her setup that was at fault, and it was beyond the scope of their job to diagnose her machine - which is sometimes hard enough to do even when you have the machine in front of you, let alone over the phone. You can't expect an ISP to fix customers' PC issues for free when some people probably charge well over $60 an hour to do that kind of thing.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      All too true. The last idiot DSL tech that came out to my house tried to pull the "It's your computer's fault" bullshit too. Don't think he realized what a nerd he was dealing with :) (hell I do networking and server administration for a living).

      Instead of just being "your computer", I have 5 computers, 2 video game consoles, and a set top box connected that all lose connection at the same time. Various combinations of disconnecting and reconnecting different devices yields no change.

      I pulled out 3 different routers and showed him that all exhibited the same issue of dropping the connection periodically - whether the computer was connected via cable (of which I plenty of different cat 5 cables to test with) or wirelessly. I've already had them switch out the DSL modem with no change earlier (I would just buy and use my own DSL modem which I'd prefer, but alas, you're not allowed to purchase that part of the equation - leased modems only).

      I also showed that any of these systems connected directly to the service with no router or other systems invovled ALSO dropped connection from time to time.

      In otherwords, if I try more than 3 or 4 different systems and cable sets and they ALL exhibit the problem, then the problem is not on my side of the phone jack. They agreed to come back the next week and drop a new service line from the road which they promised would fix it. New service line in (or at least the ground was dug up), and my connection is still dropping in and out. :(

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by genner · · Score: 1

      1. A lot of times it is the computer. People use this lie because it is a common problem
      2. If the line is up it doesn't matter what the problem is as far as the ISP is concerned. They won't trouble shoot your router unless your leaseing one from them.
      3. It's likely this woman called and harrassed the the deparment to make this happen. This sounds like a call that got transfered to a manager who sent someone out just to get her to shut up.
      4. I guarentee they read the script first before they went out. Wouldn't matter if it was something even remotely unusual.
      5. And when she screams to have a tech sent out a manager will send one out.
      6. Many viruses can corrupt the tcp/ip stack createing this scenario.

    16. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Real geeks should love solving problems."

                *I* love solving problems, but fixing fucked-to-hell WIndows installs is NOT "solving problems". That's a chore. Real geeks don't run Windows as their main OS, they run some Linux (I have run Slackware, gentoo, and Ubuntu over the years personally), or for some OS X. Running repetitive scans of AVG, adaware, ccleaner, etc, ISN'T something anyone loves. The geeks left that deal with Windows either 1) Keep it squeaky clean. Firefox & Openoffice, no IE or Outlook ever. So they don't get spyware and crap, the worst they get is SecuROM if they're gaming. 2) Use it in a VM. Broken? Roll back to the stock image. 3) Charge big bucks for repair or admining Windows.

                For my part, if someone has a computer problem and I look as a favor: 1) If it doesn't even POST it's certainly not a Windows problem, that'll be power supply, mobo, or RAM usually. 2) If they say they have a specific problem "foo hardware doesn't work" (network/"Internet", printer, CD, etc. etc.) I pop in an Ubuntu LiveCD and test the hardware out. 3) If it doesn't work, the hardware is bad and they know what to replace. If the hardware DOES work, "Windows problem. Either back up your stuff and install off that LiveCD, or get someone to fix your Windows problems. I don't do Windows." It's VIRTUALLY ALWAYS a Windows problem.

                I think I speak for many geeks in this part. I'm not interested in helping Microsoft extend their monopoly. Providing free technical support for Windows does this. I'll tech someone's COMPUTER as a favor, but not their Windows install. So do "free" Windows installs. It provides a LOT of impetus for people to use a better OS when they realize a) They don't have a Windows CD. b) No, I didn't bring a Windows CD with me and no I won't burn them one or whatever c) They'll have to buy a copy of Windows somewhere. d) They *then* realize that Windows isn't free, the cost is added onto the PC, which they then didn't even provide an install CD with making them have to buy it AGAIN. I have had SEVERAL people take me up on an offer of backing up their files (onto a USB stick), throwing Ubuntu on, and throwing the files back on, and they were VERY pleased with the results. (Yes, the printer and everything worked straight off.) I HAVE had to do tech work on a few Linux boxes and it's quite pleasant.

      ==============
                On a completely different issue with this, an ISP tech's job is to make sure there are no ISP-related problems. They are not paid to fix people's computers, in two senses. 1) The phone co tests up to the house, if you want them to do more you have to pay. Same here.. they should check up to the DSL or cable box, maybe plug something into the ethernet cable to make sure it's not bad. That's the end of their obligation, if it works there. 2) If he's like the cable techs where I live, they're kept BUSY, he'll probably blow through like 5 appointments fixing your computer for free. I could see them teching things as far as making sure the computer's using DHCP, but that's about it.

  7. No contact with any ISP employees? by sokoban · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, so up in Canada they have ISPs where you can actually get in contact with the employees instead of the automated phone system from hell?

    Lucky Canadians.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Al_Lapalme · · Score: 1

      Meh, not always lucky.

      I have shockingly different experiences with Bell Home phone and Bell Sympatico (internet)

      When my Internet stopped working, I called them, got some outsourced call center, they confirmed that there's a problem, sent my problem up to the test centre. Sometime in the next week, I get a call and have to re-explain the problem. Some time a week after that, the problem went away, the lights on the DSL modem went green again, magically, and nobody from Bell ever contacted me to let me know it's good now or what the problem was...

      When I moved and my phone wasn't working, I called at roughly 9:30 AM and before 11AM the same day, a Bell van appeared in my driveway. Problem solved in no time at all.

      --
      Al
    2. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by rm999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and after the 20th time, they reward you by sending someone to your house. Next, they waste an hour of your time, tell you they can't fix your connection, and then file criminal charges against you.

      Gotta love the Canadian ISPs ;)

    3. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it's kind of both. We (Shaw customers anyways) go through about 3-4 menu options (English/French, phone/internet, sales/inquiries/support), then get put on hold for anywhere between 5 and 30 minutes. After that it's a real person, every time!

      Not only that, but usually (definitely not always), the tech guys actually know what they are talking about and they are always local (never India, etc.) If at the end of it no resolution can be found, they'll almost always arrange to have a Tech show up within a week.

      All in all, yes we do have it VERY good up here. Now if only we weren't getting hosed for our cell phones :(

    4. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well now we know what ISPs do to reduce the demand for on-site service: sue the customer!

    5. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it only takes three or four weeks until they get tired of telling you "we're looking into it" and they send out a technician. Usually he takes a look, calls up his buddy at the switching station and they quickly realize that you haven't had Internet for the last two months because some idiot at central office didn't get around to filing the disconnect order for the previous tenant until after your connect order.

    6. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I got out of a two year DSL contract with Bell because of their slow response/broken promises.
      The phone tech mad the mistake of telling me they would send someone on site 'within one week' to diagnose my sudden, horrible connection issues.

      Since I knew it was just his way of getting me off the phone, I made a note of the time and his name. I used the week to read the terms of service on my account and gave them a call back exactly a week later.

      Since they hadn't (of course) done anything further to diagnose the issue, an hour of arguing with the manager got me out of my contract without paying the ridiculous cancellation fees.

      A few days later I was hooked up (on the same lines and equipment) with a 3rd party reseller, paying less with no contract and flawless service. Teksavvy FTW!

    7. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and then file criminal charges against you." She had her fingernail file pressed against his jugular vein demanding he fix it, OR ELSE! What did you expect?

    8. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Must be nice. Telus is smart enough not to EVER make promises. That and they're the only DSL game in town. Now I have cable.

    9. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the tech guys actually know what they are talking about and they are always local (never India, etc.)

      Canada has enough Asian immigrants that they don't have to outsource. ;-)

    10. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's kind of both. We (Shaw customers anyways) go through about 3-4 menu options (English/French, phone/internet, sales/inquiries/support), then get put on hold for anywhere between 5 and 30 minutes. After that it's a real person, every time!

      Do they play Rick Astley looped when you're on hold? Because that would be a genius touch.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fingernail file? Jeez, if a fingernail file brandished by a woman can drive terror into the soul of a technician, no wonder those bumbling idiots were able to take over a plane with boxcutters!

      Lady: Hold it right there mister. You're not going anywhere. If you even try to leave me with no internet I'll... I'll... I'll give you a manicure!

      Tech: No! Please don't! It's taken me weeks to get into this disgusting state of personal hygiene, and if you clean my fingernails, the other geeks in the office will make fun of me again!

      --
      I hate printers.
    12. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dsl co problems ticket have a reply time of 5 business day, and the test center will not bother calling a customer if it just works(usually after re installing the dslam that has been mistakingly removed)

    13. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Next, they waste an hour of your time, tell you they can't fix your connection, and then file criminal charges against you.

      If they were only going to waste an hour of her time they'd have turned up at 8:00am. Rather than 12:30pm.

    14. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by ColdSam · · Score: 1

      How do they fix it if there is nothing wrong with it? That's beyond even the best customer service and that's the part we're missing - if it were actually just the connection it's understandable that she would be snippy with them, but it sounds like it was her computer and she's just a freak.

    15. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in Sweden and maybe we do things differently but I have never heard of a DSLAM mysteriously going missing, that would be very interesting though...

      Something that happens every damn day though is that ISP#1 issues a disconnect order to Skanova for port n rack p when they actually have their equipment in rack q which means that some other poor bastard loses his connection which requires his ISP to issue a service request to Skanova which takes 2-3 days while the customer calls two times per day to his ISP to whine about how incompetent they are.

      Another classic is when DSLAM configurations for individual ports go missing, this can sometimes be fixed by first or second line support (if the config was just reverted to a sort of "factory default") but if the config for the port is completely gone then third line support need to telnet to the DSLAM to create a new port config.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    16. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's Canada. They are nice.

      Maybe they are nice because they usually talk to people instead of machines, I don't know. Correlation? Causation?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by lisakc · · Score: 1

      Wait, so up in Canada they have ISPs where you can actually get in contact with the employees instead of the automated phone system from hell?

      Lucky Canadians.

      Got the same thing here in the US. An ISP that answers their phones with PEOPLE. www.jellico.com 1-800-895-5593 (bet this doesn't get posted)

    18. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yep, a 12:30pm appointment is so that they can waste an entire day. You know with the 4 hour window on either side of the appointment.

  8. Internet addiction by hoofinasia · · Score: 5, Funny
  9. Even if she was serious, the threat was not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's like me saying, "If you don't do what I want, I'll blow up the world!"

    Even if I mean it, it is not a credible threat. Unless there was some physical aspect to this--holding a gun, a hammer, or locking her doors, etc.--who really thinks that an unarmed woman talking about taking a repair man hostage (who probably has a knife, hammer, or at least a screw driver equipped on his repair belt) is unto itself a comment worthy of police action? Was there any physical possibility of her holding him against his will?

    I would hate to think manners of speech are now subject to a PC crackdown.

    At any event, unless there is a record of the conversation, it's not sufficient evidence of anything at all.

    1. Re:Even if she was serious, the threat was not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George, its time for your meds.

    2. Re:Even if she was serious, the threat was not by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      The difference between you threatening to blow up the world and this ISP customer threatening to take the tech hostage is that the customer might have the capability to attempt the act.

      Personally, I would've worked it out on my own....but that is because I detest lawyers. Besides, most people respond to reciprocal threats.

      For example:
      Customer: "I'm gonna kick your ass if this isn't working..." --><-- Me: "Bring it on" (electricians scissors in hand)

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:Even if she was serious, the threat was not by Kuxman · · Score: 1, Informative

      if you want to see an interesting application of this... say "bomb" on an airplane....

      --
      http://www.asti-usa.com
    4. Re:Even if she was serious, the threat was not by KGIII · · Score: 1

      LOL I once *told* a female that, "Wow, you really know how to make a person feel homicidal."

      The cops were there in minutes. No charges or anything but they made me go spend the night in a hotel - leaving my OWN home/rented apartment where she was a guest - and then she stole from me so they didn't actually charge me with anything once they came back for the report. It is funny like that.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Even if she was serious, the threat was not by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      How is saying that you don't want to kidnap someone a threat to kidnap someone? If anything it's the opposite.

      She used the word "hanging", are they going to charge her with attempted murder too?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  10. Nothing to see here by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a retarded employee with a completely artless grasp of language. Public education sucks. Get over it. Move along, please.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acquisition of spoken language has nothing to do with public education (especially given the fact that one learns his or her language before attending public school). If you are going to criticize public education at least base your criticisms in fact.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here by supernova_hq · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MOD PARENT DOWN, I'd do it myself, but no points today :(

    3. Re:Nothing to see here by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      Bull. If kids spend 7 hours per day 9 months a year for 12 years listening to presumably well-educated adults orate on various subjects including English language, I expect them to have a little more abstract grasp of communication than only the first entry in the dictionary. And... it's precisely youngsters that have difficulty seeing things in shades of gray. It's always Good and Bad, Right and Wrong, Democrat and Republican.

      And yes, I realize I'm somewhat wasting my time here since you haven't bothered to log in and are likely just trolling, but what you said is just plain wrong.

    4. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank the gods for that. That means I don't have to.

  11. Not Sure Who To Believe by Caraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The part of me that burned out on tech support oh so long ago is quick to jump on the side of the repair tech. I have known people who were crazy enough to do that sort of thing when they reached their breaking point.

    On the other hand, it's possible that even if she was at her breaking point, the tech -- caught between the rock of the customer and the hard place of his employer's prior actions -- found he had to get out of there before the customer got REALLY angry.

    On the gripping hand... I've found that in the vast majority of times that I've had internet connection problems, with the exception of Verison DSL on Staten Island, NY,* especially when I was the only one in the neighborhood with connection problems, especially after several weeks... the problem has almost invariably been with my computer.

    So, wild-ass speculation here, but I think the customer vented her frustration a bit too firmly (she did say she was not going to be polite, always a bad way to start a session); the technician hit his own breaking point and rather than go off on the customer he found an excuse to flee and a story to lay on his supervisor; his story of a crazy customer with a gun who wanted to hold him hostage got blown out of proportion and the woman was taken to court... ... and in the end, it really will be something wrong with her computer.

    While my sympathy automatically lies with the technician, rationally I'm certain the truth is going to be somewhere between these two stories. And in a larger view, this might kick up the tension between residential end-users and technicians by a notch. While residential end-users might be a bit more inclined to be more polite to techs, it might also raise their animosity towards same and the relationship becomes more hostile as a result. At best this will fade into a footnote.

    * - Kids, not much is worse in a customer sense, than a telco who sells you DSL and then moves some equipment around the central office such that you are now further from the central office than they rate DSL for. You're not actually farther from the CO, but the wiring inside the CO is now long enough that you are outside the CO's radius. And then they don't tell you. Fortunately, Verizon did the right thing and finagled something so that they returned my DSL. Part of me is pretty sure I wasn't the only one who had this happen to.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    1. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's not really enough information to decide who to believe. We don't have Scott's version of events. We have the police's intentionally brief and detail free account of Scott's version of events. We don't know, for instance, why Scott believed a gun was implied.

      If this goes to trial, that will probably be the most important piece of evidence. The police didn't find a gun, so for charges to stick the implication that she had better be rock solid. Without the gun or the implication of a gun, there was no credible threat even if a threat was made.

    2. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by Caraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're entirely correct, of course. There's not enough information in TFA to say one way or another. Heck, even if it goes to trial, it's literally 'he said, she said.'

      Not finding a gun is a major piece of evidence in favor of the playwright, true. Although I've known people who will use threats like that without anything whatsoever to back it up, if they thought they could get away with it; but I'm not getting that vibe. Fortunately, the trial will not be decided on vibes. =)

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    3. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by vajorie · · Score: 1

      Not really relevant to your story (the footnote), but I ordered verizon DSL a few years ago online; they sent me everything, I hooked it up (to a computer I installed Windows on just for this, so that support can't tell me "sorry we don't support lunnax") and nothing happened. A week and 3 calls later, I learned that my residence doesn't get DSL...
      Online application still says that I qualify for DSL. I tried to chat with one of their support people recently (it's cheaper, so I wanna buy it) and it was quite interesting of a "chat":
      me: I would like to confirm that I really qualify for DSL. (insert my story above here) --- supportperson: Did you try the online form? --- me: Yes. Could you double-check with your own records somehow? I wanna make sure I qualify for this. I don't want to deal with sending back equipment and phone calls again. Thanks --- supportperson: Would you like to proceed with your order now? --- me: have a good day.

    4. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by KGIII · · Score: 1

      STFU of I'll shoot you!!!

      (Not really but, well, in some ways that would be illegal even if I had no gun. Depends on the judge. See "Armed Robbery" rules in the United States.)

      Oh, and seeing as I posted the first bit of gibberish...

      Tits or GTFO!!! NAO!

      (I couldn't resist the last bit. I tried. I blame /. for showing me where 4chan was... Oh, and I blame lolcats 'cause some of those are damned funny.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      Kids, not much is worse in a customer sense, than a telco who sells you DSL and then moves some equipment around the central office such that you are now further from the central office than they rate DSL for. You're not actually farther from the CO, but the wiring inside the CO is now long enough that you are outside the CO's radius. And then they don't tell you. Fortunately, Verizon did the right thing and finagled something so that they returned my DSL. Part of me is pretty sure I wasn't the only one who had this happen to.

      Yikes. I think we should moneybomb some bounties for engineers in Verizon and AT&T to blow the whistle.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    6. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that you've had more problems with your computer than with your service. My experience has been the opposite. There was the time another computer on the same segment of my cable modem was using the IP address DHCP assigned me... so whichever computer got a packet in first after the arp cache refreshed got internet for a while. There was the one DSL provider that went out of business. There have been a couple several hour outages on the current DSL, and a couple on an old cable modem. Oh, and another DSL provider which messed up an upgrade in their infrastructure and had to issue people new static IPs. All except the last eventually were fixed without changes on my end.

  12. The situation sounds so awkward... by MarkusJB · · Score: 1

    Between this 50 something broad trying to threaten a young buck with an implied gun, to him undoubtedly waddling away at top speed with tool belt to his car as she yells curses after his hasty retreat, it's the kind of scene I'd expect to see in a Christopher Guest film.

    1. Re:The situation sounds so awkward... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Does his cable tester go to 11?

  13. Isn't that the dream by Korbeau · · Score: 2, Funny

    of any technician to be bouund hostaagee to a laaady?

    Maybe there is another sort, but I wouldn't like them to be near my peripherals!

    1. Re:Isn't that the dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to this one :
      http://www.canadiantheatre.com/images/theatre/sinclair.jpg

    2. Re:Isn't that the dream by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a better picture of Sinclair here, much more flattering:

      http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/d-f/dinos34-01.jpg

  14. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just poor choice of words on her part. The tech should have just left. So what if she's pissed afterwards. I've worked with some cable techs in dispatch and have left houses when the place was infested with rodents or bugs, had fresh "carpet stains", a mess around everything. Never mind computers were infested with viruses, cheap hardware, a condo that needs wiring installed and they don't have written permission. No matter, the customers are bitchy, want everything now and always call to complain. I just hope with that attitude they aren't successful in business. That or they maintain a really bad family.

  15. It's a figure of speech by Skapare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a figure of speech ... "I hate to hold you hostage, but ...". That is said in a lot of contexts. If things went down as this story claims, then the ISP tech didn't understand and just blew it all out of proportion.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:It's a figure of speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree with you, except I'm not sure what to make of the Constable's statement that "she implied that she had a gun". If it were a simple misunderstanding over a figure of speech then why would she have implied that she had a weapon? Sure, it's possible that there was another misunderstanding involved. Maybe she said something like "I hate to hold you at gunpoint..."

      Without knowing what was actually said there's no way to evaluate whether she was truly threatening, or whether he overreacted.

    2. Re:It's a figure of speech by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If the sentence were as innocuous as all that, it actually would have meant the exact same thing if you took out the first seven words entirely. The introduction is not only unnecessary, it gives probable cause for suspicion, even if it is the truth. It is a little like proclaiming "I'm not carrying any bomb" just before boarding an aircraft when nobody else has even brought it up. I would conclude therefore from this that the circumstances were slightly different than actually reported in the story, and the woman's proclamation of what she said is just an attempt to cover up what may have very easily been her secret intention once she fully realized that her actions could be construed as such.

  16. Counter-suit by s0ckratees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The actress said she called her provider, Aliant, one last time, disguising her voice to sound like a man and telling the company she needed her connection right away because she was a businessman. "Lo and behold, they said someone would be over between 8 and 11 the next morning." This after the usual wall-of-please-holds she got earlier.
    Sue their asses away.

    --
    "The time has come" the walrus said " for a GOOD swim."
    1. Re:Counter-suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Lo and behold, they said someone would be over between 8 and 11 the next morning."

      My general experience with ranges is, it pretty much means they'll be there at 10:55AM, as close to the end of that range as possible.

    2. Re:Counter-suit by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering how badly some people deal with women up here? It's not a bad plan. Especially the number of times that I've had the nice old lady, grandmother, cousin, GF, get the run around by a various company until you act as the S/O, brother, etc, because they have a pair of ovaries instead of a pair of balls. This isn't a all companies are bad, rah-rah burn them down. It sure makes me wonder if they want their business still, but then I remember...that in most cases they're the only business in town.

      And it happens in nearly every business day in day out. From car shops, computer stores, ISP's to your utilities and right down to basic services. And it shouldn't.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Counter-suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, it means they'll be there at 2:30.

  17. Overreacting customer. by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 1

    Angry customer was probably annoyed that the technician couldn't solve the problem, so she overreacted and the technician got annoyed that the incompetence of others led to verbal abuse against him though he had nothing to do with what happened prior, and then called the cops. I read the headline, figured the customer was irate and overreacted against the technician, and the technician retaliated. Then I read the article and it pretty much proved my theory.

  18. You forgot the best part... by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you are arraigned you are told you can't call up and cancel service! :)

    1. Re:You forgot the best part... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you could stop the payments and refuse to talk to anyone regarding it because you're under court order not to. Bet you it'd be cancelled quickly then.

  19. Theatre People by fyoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theatre people, they're almost as bad as carnies. If you have to do on site support for theatre people, make sure there are people who know where you are going and how long you should be. If they don't hear from you after that, they should call the police.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  20. Complete misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy obviously overreacted to having a gun put to his head and a pit bull chewing on his leg. Also the quote "I want to either see the internet or your brains splattered across my computer screen" was taken out of context.

    1. Re:Complete misunderstanding by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Maybe she was rehearsing for a role as a female mob boss.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  21. This is so messed up by incognito84 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm a Haligonian and I have met Carol Sinclair (acquaintance of an acquaintance).

    What a small world. She doesn't seem like the "hostage holding" type at all, and the local ISPs are known for their shitty customer service. Seems like quite a misunderstanding.

    [Insert "so, do you know Bob/Joe/Cathy from Canada?" Jokes here]

    1. Re:This is so messed up by n+dot+l · · Score: 4, Funny

      [Insert "so, do you know Bob/Joe/Cathy from Canada?" Jokes here]

      Hey! I knew Cathy. But then again, everybody did.

    2. Re:This is so messed up by Bad+Ad · · Score: 0

      I'm a Haligonian and I have met Carol Sinclair (acquaintance of an acquaintance).

      so why did you go fix it? :-)

    3. Re:This is so messed up by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      Where is Haligonia? Never heard of such a place.

    4. Re:This is so messed up by mkiefte · · Score: 1

      I'm a Haligonian and I have met Carol Sinclair (acquaintance of an acquaintance).

      What a small world. She doesn't seem like the "hostage holding" type at all, and the local ISPs are known for their shitty customer service. Seems like quite a misunderstanding.

      According to the Chronicle Herald here in Halifax, the police found her to be very intoxicated. This makes it entirely believable that she did threaten the employee.

    5. Re:This is so messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Insert "so, do you know Bob/Joe/Cathy from Canada?" Jokes here]

      Oh, you mean Office Bob. Office Bob is dead.

    6. Re:This is so messed up by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      To quote the Molson commercial/meme "and I don't know Jimmy, Sally or Suzy from Canada, although I'm certain they're really, really nice." Except that to certain casually speaking relatives, I *am* Jimmy"

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    7. Re:This is so messed up by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      If a drunk old lady is threatening to you, you need to get the fuck out of the customer service business.

    8. Re:This is so messed up by incognito84 · · Score: 1

      It's what people from Halifax call themselves. Haligonians :)

  22. Could have been worse... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

    She could have strapped him to the bed and taken a sledgehammer to his ankles. (or, if you're a bookworm: cut off his foot with an axe and blowtorch it to cauterize the wound).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Could have been worse... by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Funny

      C'mon man, get real. You don't need to hobble a geek to keep him in the basement.

    2. Re:Could have been worse... by ColdSam · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but you do need a working internet connection. Which she ain't got.

    3. Re:Could have been worse... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon mods, those were priceless and funny!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't find it funny.

      I spent nearly 15 years in a basement, doing geek things, never really doing anything else. I am now completely anti-social, partially insane, and gainfully employed. I guess that makes me average, but I feel like shit. But hey, I make in excess of $100k/y so what the fuck, eh? Money does buy happiness...

      wait... what the fuck was I on about? whatever.

    5. Re:Could have been worse... by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 1

      boy man, even thou u live in a basement you've surley heard of hookers and blow?!

  23. I read about something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:I read about something like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a documentary about this. Mentioned a grail beacon and spankings followed by oral sex.

  24. O-Face by incognito84 · · Score: 1

    Even Lumbergh.

    1. Re:O-Face by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Oh, yyyyyyyyeah....

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  25. Court order for what happens anyway? by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is now free on conditions including that she have no contact with ... any employee from her ISP.

    Granted, I'm used to trying to call an engineer out from US ISPs... But how is this different to what you get without a court order?

  26. Best Tech support by partowel · · Score: 0

    Don't call.

    Just go to your back up system.

    1. Morse code.

    2. Quantum Accelerator.

    3. Prayer [ hah hah ]

    4. A book.

  27. My sympathies lie... by Yalius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...squarely with the tech. I do field repair work for a smallish ISP myself, and it is absolute, zero flexibility policy that if any sort of threat, even in a joking manner, is made to our safety, we leave the premises immediately. Now to the best of my knowledge, the only circumstances this has actually been invoked under have involved unruly dogs, but were a subscriber to joke about holding one of us hostage, we're required to get the hell out, even if it means leaving equipment, up to and including entire vehicles, behind if necessary.

    The policy does allow us to return to the customer's premises at a later time, at our discretion, but only when accompanied by another tech.

    While I cannot vouch for the following, it is what has been described around the office here. "Back in the day" a subscriber apparently did use a shotgun to, ahem, "troubleshoot" a wiring ped right in front of a field tech. So, no, I have no doubt whatsoever that some people are more than capable of threatening what's implied in the article.

    1. Re:My sympathies lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your policy is nothing more then a bullshit cover your companies legal ass policy. If someone actually threatens another person, the law supersedes any company rules and the situation is what it is. The policy is just so later in court the employee can't sue the company saying he was forced to be in that situation or he's lose his job.

      Now for your sympathies, as the tech being a person, I can sympathize with him as his customers won't know what they are doing and are going to be upset before he gets to the door so it is a shitty job in that regard, but looking at him as just a tech person, screw him. The company has created a situation where it take multiple calls and requests for the tech to be sent in the first place and the phone support offers nothing other then it's your computer with no direction for assistance since the customers keeps calling back for help.

      If tech support was actually anything other then an expense that companies try to minimize, it might actually be useful to people and the whole situation wouldn't even have occurred to begin with.

      I know her computer is completely screwed and probably has more viruses then the local hooker but someone from support needs to be able to say more then "Everything is fine on this end, it must be your computer." If someone could explain what she needs to do, and I mean during call one (1) things would be different.

      I think there is too much expectation from a customer to be knowledgeable even though they are the ones paying for a service.

    2. Re:My sympathies lie... by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      A new get rich quick plan:

      1. Order ISP stuffs to be installed at a vacant house.
      2. Make passing remark including word hostage, poor service.
      3. Watch hapless field tech scurry off leaving behind all valuable gear.
      4. Profit.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    3. Re:My sympathies lie... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The reason your ISP doesn't help you troubleshoot your computer beyond telling you how to set up your NIC setting, IP settings, give you POP3/SMTP settings and ask you to check your firewall settings is partly because it's not really practical for them to try to help you with things that are either your responsibility or the responsibility of the computer/router/firewall manufacturers support and partly for legal reasons.

      I can safely say that more than 4/5 calls to ISP tech support are due to problems in hardware or software that the ISP is not responsible for. Hell, a lot of ISPs give more tech support than the contract states they have to give, a lot of time the contract states that all the ISP is responsible for is delivering the connection to the customer's premises and giving the customer the information required to get a working connection, any tech support beyond "VPI is 8, VCI 35, You have a dynamic IP address assigned via DHCP and the SMTP relay is smtprelay1.isp.com" is just icing on the cake.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:My sympathies lie... by hellwig · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think an extra 5 minutes on the phone explaining to someone they need a virus scanner is a lot better than losing that person as a customer because all your stupid IT personel would do is tell the person the problem isn't on the company's end. Do you think someone who knows nothing about computers gives a shit that your cable lines are running if they can't connect to the internet? Doubtful. They'll drop your sevice in a heartbeat. One lost customer just because you have some arbitrary rule that all tech calls should be 4 minutes or less. I used to work directory assistance (411) for a cellular company when I was in highschool. We would track down numbers anywhere we could, provide people assistance in tracking down a business even if they didn't know the name, and we even provided movie listings and times. Other companies had a 2-minute limit. Needless to say, we got more thank-yous than thanks-for-nothings. Unfortunately Comcast bought the company (for some reason) and shut it down once they bled it dry.

      As for the first guy: What company do you work for? I feel like getting some free equipment when the tech leaves it on my private property. Good luck proving I threatened him or anything. You wanna see threatening, watch what I'll do if you trespass trying to get your equipment back.

      But seriously, I've never waved a loaded weapon at a tech support guy before.

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
    5. Re:My sympathies lie... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Except the customers who require those "extra 5 minutes" normally require more like "an extra 20 minutes" and this particular group of customers have a tendency to call way too often which means that the SEK 200/month that they're paying ends up being less than what the ISP is spending on tech support for them. It's basically a numbers game, you don't want the complete idiots who know nothing about computers yet try to "optimize" their mail settings once or twice per week, or who connect a 10 meter extension cord between their DSL modem and the wall, have their connection break, spend 30 minutes arguing with tech support about the extension cord before finally agreeing to remove it, their connection starts working again and then they call in three days later after reconnecting the extension cord. Yes, this happens all the time and no sane ISP wants these customers.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:My sympathies lie... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      The tech needs to grow a couple brain cells, and understand what "a figure of speech" means.

    7. Re:My sympathies lie... by ktappe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I have to agree with the other posters who say your policy is BS. If you're completely unable to tell that this lady was not actually going to hold you hostage, and your rules do not allow you to understand the context of words spoken to you, then you are unable to function in normal society. You are a 'special needs' person and should be committed to a facility where people can talk to you like a 3 year old all day as you watch non-stressful television to pass the remainder of your time on this planet. And absolutely, no harmless customer who is merely trying to treat you like an intelligent, thinking individual should be put through the wringer that this woman was and that your policy apparently dictates. Tolerance of your anti-social behavior and policy should be nil.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    8. Re:My sympathies lie... by deprecated · · Score: 1

      Your sympathies are corroding the commonsense terminals of the universe. Please stop.

    9. Re:My sympathies lie... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you, if she really said "I don't want to hold you hostage, but would you mind hanging around until the other technician arrives so that the two of you can sort it out." then she was quite clearly not threatening him. It's a normal phrase part of speech. If someone said "I don't want to steal any more of your time", would you call them a thief?

      Likewise, if the tech is correct that she "implied" she had a gun and would not allow him to leave until he fixed it, then she will likely be found guilty.

      I don't see what any of this has to do with whether or not the problem was with her computer. If I were the tech, however, I would have tried my laptop on the connection real quick and showed her that the problem was not on the ISP's end.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    10. Re:My sympathies lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >zero flexibility policy that if any sort of threat, even in a joking manner, is made to our safety

      You need to learn the difference between a threat and a colloquialism. All of us--even you--use words and phrases in the course of normal speech which, if taken literally, are meaningless, absurd, or possibly even alarming. The speaker, however, has none of those in mind when uttering the words. That is the nature of idiomatic speech: an obliquely-related collection of words become a synonym for another word, or serve to satisfy some sort of social pressure.

      In fact, this particular phrase is intended to be polite. It indicates that the speaker is aware of the imposition the request entails. Think of it as a cultural equivalent of a smiley.

    11. Re:My sympathies lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think an extra 5 minutes on the phone explaining to someone they need a virus scanner is a lot better than losing that person as a customer because all your stupid IT personel would do is tell the person the problem isn't on the company's end."
                No it's not. These people will keep calling in expecting computer advice. If someone wants computer advice, get a computer tech to look at the computer. Additionally 1) When I worked at the cable co, we weren't supposed to name brands since it appears we may be endorsing it; calls were also supposed to be short. 2) It's up to the customer being polite before I'd go ANY "extra mile" for them. Most were rude and could frankly choke on a dick.

      "Do you think someone who knows nothing about computers gives a shit that your cable lines are running if they can't connect to the internet? Doubtful. They'll drop your sevice in a heartbeat."
                And then keep dropping services one after the other because "they don't work". So what?

  28. Physical restraint? by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did she physically prevent him from leaving? Did he even try to leave? If not he should be buried up to his neck and be pelted with muffin fans from 20 paces.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Physical restraint? by Caraig · · Score: 1

      See above. It's possible that the ISP has a 'zero risk' policy as far as threats to technicians go... and it kind of makes sense. It's one thing if you're at a commercial site, quite another if you're at a residence.

      However, the article is pretty light on actual facts. Much of it is he-said/she-said. the lack of a weapon does bode ill for the tech's case, though.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    2. Re:Physical restraint? by hellwig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The policies of the company do not equal willful and unlawful intent on behalf of the customer. Just cause the technician might have perceived a threat based on her off-color remark doesn't mean she actually attempted to kidnap him. I can't believe they arrested this woman solely based on the account of the technician, especially since he wasn't kidnapped and they found no weapons in her house. IANAL, but I imagine she would have to have made some serious threats to his safety (not just saying "I don't mean to kidnap you but could you stay longer"), or done something physical (such as brandish a weapon or impede his escape) to even consider it kidnapping. I mean, is saying "please don't go" grounds to prosecute kidnappers in Canada? In America, you can say "I'm so angry I could kill Joe-Bob," without breaking any laws (as long as Joe-Bob isn't the president). You just have to cross your fingers that Joe-Bob isn't killed in the near future.

      I guess we just won't know if all we have is both of their stories to go by. I think her response should have been "Please disconnect my service and cease all future billing if it won't work" rather than "fix it or I'll kidnap you". Oh but wait, I'm sure Aliant as with all other ISPs/Telecoms has a total monopoly in her area, leaving her with no other option to connect to the internet. Now who's doing the hostage taking?

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
  29. I bet it is her computer that is the problem. by Greymoon · · Score: 0

    ... she went back upstairs to the condo and cracked a vodka cooler. "It was five hours earlier than I usually drink, but I was frankly a little frustrated.", laminated Sinclair. Don't drink and Internet, it's the computer.

  30. getting out by vajorie · · Score: 1

    how is she gonna cancel her contract with the ISP if she is not allowed to contact any of their employees??

    1. Re:getting out by Caraig · · Score: 1

      That's something that her lawyer/solicitor can take care of, I imagine. I'm sure the court order prevents her from personally contacting the ISP, but her solicitor would not have that order placed upon them.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  31. She's an actress and a playwright by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to me that she was just being humorously dramatic. Summary says nothing about a weapon being presented at any time.

    1. Re:She's an actress and a playwright by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      And TFA says that the police found no weapon at all in her house.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  32. Her story about the Vodka Cooler doesn't seem beli by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    That should read "Threatened to take him hostage (is not the same as) Taking him hostage - the title is misleading. I had a less than and greater than that were scrubbed out of the final posting - sorry.

    It depends on who you believe. Read the article. According the Tech, she took him hostage, then he escaped. Or if you believe her *side* of the story, the Tech shows up at 12:30 PM, works on her computer, and then takes off running for no reason whatsoever, and then she sits down to drink a third of a vodka cooler as the police knocks on her door.

  33. ISP excuse, thinks I by randolph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a remarkably good excuse for the ISP not doing their job; the customer is forbidden to contact them. I think it's probably system-abuse on the part of the ISP.

  34. It's clearly her fault! by Fluffeh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not to directly jump in and take sides, but if you want a service, and have to call twenty times with no result, anything else that eventuates is your fault. If someone can't provide you the right service after one call (okay, throw in a second followup call just for good measure) then do business with someone else. Uselss companies will flounder, good companies will flourish. People seem to have lost the ability to look at a service and say "Hey, you aren't doing a good enough job here. Pack up, leave and I will give my money to someone better than you."

    Why accept such poor service at all?

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:It's clearly her fault! by seriesrover · · Score: 1
      But we don't actually know what the fault was...it took 20 calls, probably all saying "hey we can't find anything wrong" and then this tech guy comes out and says the same thing. The ISP are responsible for the wire to your house; from then on its your responsibility.

      If your business (and/or life) relies on the computer you better have the support in place to get things fixed, or do it yourself. There are way too many people out there that want the fruits of a computer \ internet but think it should all magically work flawlessly all the time. Hopefully this is a wake up call for her.

    2. Re:It's clearly her fault! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Are you high? She might just use Windows. Meaning that, yeah, the problem *could* be unfixable by all those calls and all their assistance.

      Today I no longer do house calls. I own a web hosting company. I have a client... I'll sell her account to you if you think you are all that and a bag of chips. We often need to have her email us the content she wants uploaded AND the exact instructions as to where she wants stuff on the page. This is after three, yes three, years of servicing her. We keep her because she's wonderfully grand and pays her bill on time and drinks almost as much as I do.

      Find one other company, including your own fictional company, that does that... One...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:It's clearly her fault! by what+about · · Score: 1

      You assume that there is a choice and that switching is less or equal hassle than try to "fix" the current service

      This is not often the case. I am attempting to have Telecom Italia fix my ADSL, it is losing packets and by using a special crafted MRTG and line quality data collection I can pinpoint the issue, but this is no good with the "trolls" at the helpdesk.

      What they did is to lower my maximum ADSL speed at 41% of channel capacity (as reported by my router), the problem is still there

      Do I have a choice ? maybe yes.
      How difficult is to switch, a lot of hassle, really

    4. Re:It's clearly her fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why accept such poor service at all?"

      Regional Monopolies. I have three choices for "broadband" internet service in my area: Comcast, Comcast and Comcast.

    5. Re:It's clearly her fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, there are few choices of ISP in the Halifax area. However, any competent technician should have a bootable GNU/Linux CD in their tool bag to help determine whether it is the customer's computer at fault when all other avenues of problem diagnosis are a dead end.

    6. Re:It's clearly her fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why accept such poor service at all?

      Sometimes you don't really have a choice. My options here are: 1) Roadrunner, 2) move five miles north for Comcast, 3) REALLY big Pringles cantenna, 4) CowboyNeal.

    7. Re:It's clearly her fault! by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because for me, and many, MANY people in this country, switching ISP's isn't just a matter of picking up the phone and calling the next provider. I I want to switch ISP's I have to sell my home and move elsewhere. My DSL is sold to me from the local phone company. It drops connection all the time leading me to call them over and over to fix it. I'm not at 20 yet, but I'm certainly over 10. I'm not going to switch though because dropping them means going back to dial up, and the only local access number for any ISP here is provided by guess who: THE SAME DAMNED COMPANY. So, I will continue to call them over, and over, and over, and over until they fix the damn thing because aside from moving (which I simply am not financially able to do, nor do I really want to), that's the only option.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:It's clearly her fault! by infalliable · · Score: 1

      Probably is there is often really is no other option most of the time. You have one company with a monopoly on cable internet and another with a monopoly on DSL. AND they both have the worst customer service imaginable. Who do you go with?

    9. Re:It's clearly her fault! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking for the word laptop. A bootable GNU/Linux CD won't do you any good when the computer has a bad network card (or any of a million other hardware faults).
       
      I've been sent to houses where the customer's computer is literally in pieces, laying all over the floor. Case here, hard drive there, motherboard over there, etc. Why? "It didn't work so I asked Little Johnny next door to fix it for me."

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    10. Re:It's clearly her fault! by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, okay, seems things are different over there to over here.

      Over here, if I am within a "normal" suburban area, I can go with generally any of about 5 larger companies and a handful of local ISP's. The worst experience I can recall was TPG.com.au taking 3 calls to resolve an issue (which also took about a week to do) at which point I got them to remove the service and joined Internode.com.au who I have been delighted with.

      Given that Australia is generally a long way behind in regards to broadband enabled countries, I assumed it was better in the US.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  35. Huh? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a figure of speech ... "I hate to hold you hostage, but ...". That is said in a lot of contexts.

    Huh?
    I've never heard that statement used in conversation, in any context.

    1. Re:Huh? by 98+Rezz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've heard it before. It's sort of an apologetic jest for asking someone to stay a bit longer than they intended to get something finished.

    2. Re:Huh? by Skapare · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard it a lot. But I'm in the USA. Maybe the Canadians never use it enough for most people to know about it.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:Huh? by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      I've never heard that statement used in conversation, in any context.

      If you're not in her area of Canada that means nothing -- it could be a local saying.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nerd.

    5. Re:Huh? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      If it were a local saying, then would not the tech who lives in the same area be aware of it?

    6. Re:Huh? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I have. "I hate to hold you hostage" is the same as "I hate to be an imposition."

    7. Re:Huh? by tricorn · · Score: 1

      "I don't want to xxx but yyy" is a common way of saying "when I say "yyy", it may sound like "xxx", but it's not. In other words, if that's what she really said, she was explicitly saying "I"m not going to hold you hostage". So she threatened him with not doing something. In addition, "holding someone hostage", absent physical restraint or threatening with a weapon, is a common expression of anything holding someone up, not unlawful restraint.

      Bringing a cup of hot tea, "I don't want to scald you, so I'll hold on to this until you stand up." is also not threatening to scald someone with hot tea.

      Finally, if she really did say what she claims, it sounds like the tech was giving lots of excuses, and her request to stay to exchange notes with the other tech was entirely reasonable.

    8. Re:Huh? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      It's sounding more and more like a localized thing, not widespread or common at all.

    9. Re:Huh? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Every place has some polite euphemisms for things. "I'm going to the little boy's room." No, that doesn't mean that they are planning on molesting boys, but that they are headed to the bathroom/toilet, WC, or whatever. I've never heard anyone take "not to hold you hostage, but I'd like if you..." as a statement that the person was, in fact, a hostage at that time. Some may not have heard it before, but all I have seen have taken it as I have described. Are you honestly telling me that if someone said "not to hold you hostage, but would you mind waiting around for your replacement to make sure that the two of you can finish it?" that you would take that as a violent threat? If you wouldn't, then you are falling in line with my statements that it is an innocuous statement of politeness.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard "not to twist your arm, but..."? Same thing. It's called humor of exaggeration. Of course you are not literally holding them hostage, but if they stick around they are not at liberty to do anything else, are they? Like a hostage, they can't leave; unlike a hostage, it is by mutual consent.

      It's a joke, son.

      Unfortunately, like most humor, it is best employed only when one is fairly certain both parties can undertand and appreciate the joke.

  36. She'll never fly again by Seindal · · Score: 1

    after all, she's almost definitely a terrorist..

    --
    René Seindal
  37. Simple solution by xenobyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The repair man should have plugged in a laptop or similar, showing a working connection, thus placing the issue squarely on the customers computer. If the repair man couldn't make his laptop connect either, the issue is either with both computers or - much more likely - the connection, and thus he knows he has work to do.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    1. Re:Simple solution by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Bing! That is the right answer. There is no excuse for anything less. It should work just like the phone company. They have a box outside that is the delimiter between their responsibility and yours. If they have to come out to check the line, they will plug into the outside box with their own phone. If they get a dial tone, they will place an outgoing call, and have an incoming call placed to your number. At that point, there is no question as to who's problem it is.

  38. first thought by vlad30 · · Score: 1

    was handcuffs maybe some rope then I saw her pic no wonder he went to the police

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  39. She was arrested?! by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folks, in Canada it's one thing to be charged, it's another to be arrested. In the US if the police are convinced you've committed a crime, they arrest you. In Canada, if you're not posing an imminent danger to others, you just get charged. They tell you to come in, do some paperwork, and let you know the pre-trial date etc. She must have been beyond hysterical when the cops arrived, either completely shitfaced or holding a knife, or both. That's what it would take to get arrested in your own home under those circumstances.

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
    1. Re:She was arrested?! by neverutterwhen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So she must have done something to be arrested? You have innocent before proven guilty in Canada too, right? Not just innocent before arrested.

      --
      My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
    2. Re:She was arrested?! by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      I meant she must have done something to convince the police she was a danger to others. At the very least she must have threatened something in the presence of the police. In many of those cases they arrest but don't charge with a crime, since usually the arrest gets the point across just fine, and it saves the perp a criminal record.

      So you could say we have innocent even when arrested and guilty ;)

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  40. I hate to hold you all hostage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reading my comment, but that technician seems like a real @sshole.

    1. Re:I hate to hold you all hostage... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Of course he is; he works for an ISP. Someone with a better temperment could get a real job.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  41. Please remove Idle from front page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear /. crew, please remove Idle at least from the front page, if not altogether. It's annoying, and makes me look strange when people "shoulder-surfing" see that stuff among the tech news. And no, registering a user account and disabling it is not an option for me -- I don't want to have to log in on each of the various machines I use through the day just to take a glimpse at the front page.

  42. How did she hold him hostage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is kind of unlikely, isn't it.

    Even if it was a man, how would he do it? Point a gun at them? Tie them up? Any form of restraint that didn't require force is unlikely to be a hostage situation.

    1. Re:How did she hold him hostage? by murr · · Score: 1

      Given that this was an ISP tech, putting a large paper bag over his head would probably be enough to hold him for as long as you want.

    2. Re:How did she hold him hostage? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Parakeet Anti-defamation league on line 4... something about libelous comparisons...

  43. I've had by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had, though over the phone, not in person. Sadly, tempting as it is, you can't really hold someone hostage over the phone ;)

    ACT 1

    It went like this: so at some point I activate my email at T-Online. They had a handy-dandy page that allows one to change their _email_ password, and I use it.

    Suddenly I can't log in to the ISP any more. I figure, hmm, I bet the damned thing changed my ISP password too. I try the new one, it doesn't work either.

    I'm pretty sure I didn't forget the new password, since it was one I had used before. But ok, it could happen. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt.

    So I call the ISP's tech support, he makes me try both the new and old password, neither works, ok, he says he'll send me a new one by post. But first he wants to know my invoice number, to be sure he's sending it to the right guy. I read the one from my phone bill to him. Says it's ok, all clear, he'll send me a new password.

    A week goes by, I have no new password. I call again, different employee, makes me read him the invoice number again, assures me all is well and he'll send me the new password. Nothing happens.

    The spiel continues for one and a half fucking months, in increasinly short intervals as my patience wears thin. Then I lose my patience entirely and escalate it to hell and back.

    Turns out that when I moved, both the ISP and the parent telco gave me a new invoice number. Each. Different ones. But on the bill there was only the telco one. So the retards from support saw that the numbers don't match and _lied_ to me.

    They fucking lied to me for a month and a half. They didn't even bother telling me what's wrong, or finding a simple solution like "ok, come to one of our stores to prove it's you." Nah, the bloody retards lied to me.

    (At this point it's worth noting that (A) DSL connections are point-to-point anyway, (B) they can know it's me or at least calling from my phone number since it's a subsidiary of my telco, but most importantly (C) they're sending it by post to my address. What more confirmation do they want?)

    ACT 2

    My brother buys a new house informs the same telco and isp, is assured he'll get dsl in a couple of days.

    It's worth noting that somehow he was flagged as VIP customer. Dunno why. Maybe because he and his wife are addicted to their cell phones, and get a phone bill comparable to some small companies. But anyway, he's a VIP customer and for that they assure him that it won't take more than a day or two to switch his account to the new address.

    Short story: the same spiel as in my case happens. He's repeatedly assured that, yeah, verily, someone will take care of it by tomorrow. And nothing happens. Again and again.

    What had happened? The drone who entered his new address made a typo. Let's say his new house number was 42 A (not the real one, for the obvious reasons), and the drone entered it as 42 S. Which didn't exist.

    Ok, typos happen.

    But again, they just lied to him again and again. If they do that even to "VIP customers", I rest my case.

    ACT 3

    After the previous incident, I was weary of doing anything to my connection any more. But eventually I'm dumb enough to say yes, when some salesman offers me (again) to upgrade my connection to 6000 MB/s instead 1000.

    Life goes on for a month or so, in which time nothing happens to my connection, good or bad. As in, I'm still on 1000. Well, ok, I'm fine with that. At least I still have it.

    Then suddenly I can't log in any more.

    The call this time was a surrealistic carousel affair, where I'm passed around between 6 different departments. Each sees only his slice of the problem, so as soon as it even touches any other domain or aspect, he gives me a new phone number to call. And, as we'll see, didn't even see his own slice well enough.

    It took me a whole weekend, albeit with large breaks to recharge my phone's batteries, of going round robin like that.

    In that time, I'm

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I've had by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      So you've been dealing with SBC have you? They were always very nice people, but their internet and phone divisions seemed to exist on separate planets speaking separate languages and a penalty of death for anyone on either side who even thought about talking to anyone on the other.

    2. Re:I've had by guardian-ct · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's a rule somewhere that the phone company's phone and internet divisions have to be as separate as possible. The theory was that having them separate would allow better competition to occur.

      I couldn't get my DSL installed until I had two techs come out to my place, one from the phone company, and one from the internet section. They swapped info, and could then begin working on the problem. The solution: replace the bad card in their DSL remote terminal box that was claiming that it was working properly, when in fact it didn't let me out past that card. Time required: 2 months until I finally convince phone company to send someone out, and 3-4 days after the 2 techs met. They weren't allowed to talk to each other until they met physically. This was about 7 years ago.

    3. Re:I've had by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've had, though over the phone, not in person. Sadly, tempting as it is, you can't really hold someone hostage over the phone ;)

      Actually, with some PBX systems you can... and it's quite fun to do.

      If you (the customer) don't hang up, the connection never really goes away, even if the help desks guy/gal hangs up. The connection stays, and prevents any other call from getting through to them. They still can call other people internally (putting you on hold), but they can't hang up. Well eventually, after a longish time (half an hour) and possibly after the intervention of their manager, they are able to break lose, but it's not pretty. I've used this twice with some success (once with my mobile phone provider, who wouldn't supply me the parameters to configure internet via GSM, and then again a couple of months later against Philips who refused to tell me where they've lost my hand-held movie player that I sent in for warranty repair)

    4. Re:I've had by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      So why are you still using them?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    5. Re:I've had by e-scetic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have my own horror story of a similar nature, this one with Bell and Bell Sympatico High Speed (a Canadian thing).

      Pre-Move: Bell has a "helpful" e-Move link on their website, you simply go to the page, login, fill out the info, state when you want to move, you're done. I opted to call the phone number on the page, just to be sure. Rep was extremely polite and helpful, asked when I wanted the service switched, assured me that was all there was to it.

      Day of Move: No switch. No internet.

      Move+1: Called them. Three transfers later was bumped to "Business Services" for some reason, which was a call center in India. Woman could barely speak English, line quality was atrocious, staticky - this was to be the case every time. Her computer was saying I was still at the old address, she tried to place a move order but got an error. Said to call back next day.

      Move+2: Called back. Same error, said to call back next day.

      Move+3: Same error, decided to call residential services just in case to make sure they had moved my phone line. They said their records showed me as connected at my new address, moreover they had sent someone over to physically reconnect me.

      Move+4: Business Services again, same error, bounced around by the reps. Told them what residential services had said.

      By the way, side note, everyone in India seemed to contradict each other in what they said they saw in my records, they were either lying, couldn't read, or their records are a royal mess. Also, it may be their culture, or their training, but they always try to make it seem as if its your fault, as if they'd done everything they could and you were wasting their time. There are some serious attitude problems over there.

      Move+5: Decided to call tech support instead,. Explained the problem. Tech support transferred me to High Speed services. Went through the motions of "is your modem blinking", "is your line under 10 feet long", etc. Call kept getting escalated, they started seeing that things should be working but weren't. Eventually someone found the tech that had gone out had left notes saying the wiring was FUBAR'd. Said they would send another tech. Made appointment, had to wait all day.

      Move+6: Nobody came. Around this time I noticed I had no dial tone (I know, I know, but I use the line solely for data...). Called residential support again. Found they had indeed sent someone on moving day, but had NOT hooked up the line due to complications. The Bell rep tried to sell me line insurance! Started telling him why that was so wrong but he transferred me in mid-spiel (goddamned fucker). Made appointment for them to come and finish the job. Would have to wait for them all day.

      Move+7: Waited all day, nobody came. Called Bell, they said they had sent someone - only thing was, it couldn't have been true because they sent them around the same time I was busy making the appointment for them to come. Made another appointment, again had to wait for them all day.

      Move+8: Two guys showed up, said they had a hard time finding my line outside the building, it was such a mess of old phone wiring. Took them an hour to install a whole new physical line. Line showed a signal, but no internet. They said to wait until next day to see if it came up.

      Move+9: It didn't. Called High Speed, I explained that when they sent the tech earlier there was actually no physical line, it was only just created, so could they please another. Made appointment, had to wait all day again.

      Move+10: Nobody came or so much as knocked on my door, but internet came back up.

      Long story short, I think we're headed for a world where corporations will need bunkers.

    6. Re:I've had by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      My dad got Comcast (ugh) to replace his discontinued Sprint Wireless Broadband service. The tech came out to install the service, but left before it was working, saying "wait until tomorrow, it should work." I came over a few days later, to find that it still wasn't working. My dad decided to call them yet AGAIN, with me in the room, to get them to fix it.

      While listening to the call, and watching what was happening (everything redirected him to Comcast's Welcome page, even after registering), I finally got fed up and nudged my dad off the computer. I manually set the DNS server and it worked fine. Comcast's DNS server apparently didn't want to update its records to show that my dad had registered. The tech rep on the phone gave us some national Comcast DNS servers to use (they worked) and made a note in their systems to fix the errant server... supposedly.

      It's sad that an installer, five phone tech reps and a manager couldn't figure this out.

    7. Re:I've had by ktappe · · Score: 1

      So why are you still using them?

      Please look up "monopoly" in your dictionary before you post next time. Thanks.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    8. Re:I've had by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, sounds like you had a little bit of trouble there.

    9. Re:I've had by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Usually there's at least a choice between DSL and cable internet, and even then, there's usually a choice of DSL providers.

      Apologies if this is not the case, in which case you should contact your representative.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  44. considering as the story is on idle by nimbius · · Score: 1

    im rooting for her to be sentenced to 80 years hard labour in a PMITA prison.
    or i conveniently didnt rtfa ;)

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:considering as the story is on idle by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we incarcerate women only with other women.

      This means she won't get PMITA prison unless she has a sex change.

      OTOH, she may very well get PLMCETISRBUIC prison.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  45. I did by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    if you want to see an interesting application of this... say "bomb" on an airplane....

    I did. Me, a friend and mom were travelling by plane at one point in the 80's. Much to mom's annoyance (and probably because it annoyed her), I spent the whole time at both airports and on the plane telling jokes about airplane hijacks and bombings.

    Admittedly, we did get a few cops around us on the airport listening to my jokes.

    But you know what? That was it. They didn't even butt into the talk, or try to be menacing or anything. I'm still guessing that probably they were bored enough and the jokes made their day.

    The post 9/11 histeria there wasn't normal at any time before. And in a lot of countries it still isn't.

    Now threatening to blow up the plane, or falsely reporting a bomb, those are serious crimes. Even as a joke. Because they cause quite the disruption.

    But just saying the word "bomb" or telling an obvious joke about a bomb? Geeze. If you can't do that, ask yourself what went wrong and when.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I did by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "I'm a statistician. I always bring a bomb to a plane ride. For safety. The chance that there are two bombs on a plane are insignificant."

      You only tell that joke ONCE in an airport. Especially today. Trust me about that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I did by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That was fine in the 80's. Nowdays, if you refer to the latest movie as a "bomb" at the airport, you'll get strip-searched.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:I did by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Awesome, I finally have an easy way to get some action!

  46. Re:GOATSE! by Spatial · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we know. Welcome to the Internet.

  47. I dunno... by aceofhertz · · Score: 1

    If this issue was with the ISP's equipment, then this escalated way too far and should have been resolved on the first phone call. On the other hand, the story really does leave out the most important part... was it her computer? If it was her computer, I can understand it taking 20 calls to get a technician out to look at the issue. Regardless if you're a big company or a small company, performing a service costs money, from the call centre agents who are taking the calls to the technicians who go out and repair connections. If it's an issue with the equipment the ISP provides, then to resolve the issue and keep the customer paying, it's "worth' sending a tech out to get the issue resolved. However, if they send a technician out and it's a computer-related issue, the company has basically wasted money, which in the long run leads to higher fees. The customer should have gone to a PC technician, said "My internet isn't working", found out what was wrong, and then, if it ends up being an issue with the connection or the ISP's equipment, make them pay for the PC Tech visit. Not all technicians who go out and repair connections are skilled in computers. I've seen techs call in for instructions on how to release and renew an IP address. The customer may have been thinking that if a tech comes out and can't fix the connection, he can fix her computer. But again, it's all based on where the underlying issue was.

    --
    "To err is human... to really foul up requires the root password."
    1. Re:I dunno... by infalliable · · Score: 1

      I certainly see your point, but I've had terrible luck with ISPs and Cable operators. They have horrendous tech support and contractors (technicians) around here.

      For every problem I've had, and I've had quite a few, it's taken an average of 3 trips to get it fixed. Bad wiring, broken cable boxes, more bad wiring, a voice mail "Hello this is X install guy, I'm outside your house and no one answered so I'm leaving" while someone was sitting on the couch by the door and he never answers his phone, never showing up and then the company saying they have no record of the guy being scheduled to come (they called to confirm the day before though).

      Over the course of a year, I probably spent a minimum of 18 hours on the phone with DSL tech support before canceling. I know it was not my PC as the DSL modem reset every 15 seconds...no matter "It appears as though your DSL connection is working fine. Thank you and have a nice day." The only reason it lasted that long was that the other cable company in the area already blew 3 strikes on their install job (not showing up twice, being total idiot the other time and not getting anything done) and I was in no hurry to try them again. Thank goodess work pays for a wireless access card now.

      So I can certainly see why someone would be uninclined to see the technician leave...although it sounds like she went too far.

  48. Still a fucktard by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Well, then he's an even bigger fucktard.

    Involving the police in a petty retaliation game is already an abuse. Filing criminal chages against someone as a petty retaliation? Oooer.

    All in all, I hope the retard goes to PMITA jail for it, _if_ that is the case. Abusing the police and justice system as one's private goon squad to terrorize/punish people one doesn't like, isn't exactly something I'd want to see repeated.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  49. Oh Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "is that the customer might have the capability to attempt the act."

    Riiiight.

    If a middle aged woman with no weapon threatens you, *and you feel threatened*, it's time to hit the weight room, take a martial arts course, and probably both and more.

    I don't know if you kids use the word "Pussy" nowadays, but I have a feeling if you look up the word "Pussy" in the dictionary, this repair-things (hard to call him a man) picture would be there.

    I mean, really.

    1. Re:Oh Please by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      If a middle aged woman with no weapon threatens you, *and you feel threatened*, it's time to hit the weight room, take a martial arts course, and probably both and more.

      Its more of a socital problem. I'd be afraid of said woman from a legal standpoint because; 1)The law rightfully gives her the benefit of the doubt since its her home, 2) self defense is hard to argue these days, and 3) the whole cultural aspects of threatening force against a girl, even if its in defense.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:Oh Please by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      4) Violence commited BY women is very common in part because of comments like "If a middle aged woman with no weapon threatens you, *and you feel threatened*, it's time to hit the weight room, take a martial arts course, and probably both and more."

  50. Sounds like a Drunk, Frustrated User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From her local newspaper ( http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/Search/1076377.html )

    "Halifax police told the Chronicle Herald that when David Arthur Scott, 21, arrived to fix the Internet on Thursday afternoon, he determined the problem was with the computer.

    But Sinclair said she had tried using the Internet on three different computers, and that it did not work on any of them.

    "She didnâ(TM)t like the answer and became very angry and agitated," said Const. Jeff Carr.

    Sinclair said she asked Scott to call another technician after he could not repair the problem.

    "She told the technician, in a tirade, that he was not leaving her until her Internet was working and she told him she was keeping him hostage," said Carr.

    Sinclair said that Scott misheard her.

    "I said Iâ(TM)m not holding you hostage, but I would like it if youâ(TM)d stay until (the other technician) arrives," Sinclair said. "Thatâ(TM)s all I can think of where he got that from."

    Carr said Sinclair implied she had a gun, but that the technician did not see one. Police say the technician told Sinclair he had a disc in his truck that could repair her Internet, and Sinclair said she was going with him so he wouldnâ(TM)t run off.

    But Sinclair said she followed the technician downstairs to his truck to prop the door open to the building so he could get back in.

    The technician then hopped in his truck and drove back to the Aliant office.

    Police said they soon arrived at the apartment where they arrested an "extremely intoxicated woman" without incident.

  51. Re:Far too long by Doc+Nielsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i did - very interesting

    --
    To boldly mod where no one has trolled before.
  52. Vodka coolers? by rmc · · Score: 1

    I liked the bit about her making a point of mentioning she drank a significant amount of alcohol after the incident, and that she normally doesn't do this, but hey, I was stressed out.

    For those of you who've never had to deal with things like domestic abuse, that's classical weasel talk for "I was drunk as a skunk and misbehaved as a result, but I won't admit it". It was no doubt prompted by the police smelling her breath or seeing an empty bottle, and asking uncomfortable questions as a result.

    We'll never know what really happened, but I'm going with "abrasive drunk woman tears techie a new one" here. Although I can understand someone losing their cool after such a long and fruitless struggle to get their connection fixed.

  53. Drunk by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that this woman was drunk and the ISP had told her repeatedly that it was her computer that was at fault. The connection was working perfectly. This is just another case of a person knowing so little about computers that they don't even know who is to blame. The person to blame is the woman trying to operate a device beyond her comprehension. She broke her computer and was unwilling to hire the proper company to come fix it. If my washing machine was broken I wouldn't blame the power company who provides my electricity when they would refuse to fix it. If you read the story where they do tell the ISPs side they tell you that she called 20 times and they told her 20 times that her connection was fine. Then they sent a tech who plugged in his computer and it was again working fine. He told her that her computer was at fault and that he was not going to fix that. This is when she lost it. The police kept her in jail overnight. In Canada the police are not so gung ho to arrest people so if they arrested her she had to be out of control. This issue is not a two sided issue.

  54. I can't beleave it. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    A tech guy took a comment out of context...

    Oh what what am I talking about just browse Slashdot.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  55. Can never quit by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    "free on conditions including that she have no contact with the repairman or any employee from her ISP."

    So she can never quit her service, no matter what they change the rates to? Brilliant! Why don't the quote tags work in idle? whay is the text box _still_ 22 char wide?

  56. ISP support a farce by luwain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had a lot of experience with ISP support, with Adelphia (before they collapsed), Comcast (before I switched) and now Verizon. I'm a computer engineer, so if I call the ISP it's usually because I've figured out that the problem is at their end, and I can tell them what to do to fix it, yet I've found myself getting very, very, very frustrated and angry at the absurdity that I've encountered. In one case, after a half-hour of maneuvering through the maddening computer prompts (press 1, press 3, press 7 etc...) to speak to a human being, I got a support person who gave me the standard "reboot your computer and reset your modem". After a few minutes of first humoring him, and then another few minutes of walking through steps I knew were not the problem, I tried to explain to him what the problem was and what he had to do. He obviously had no idea about IP addresses, default gateways, DSN or what "ping" meant -- and after pretending to listen to me, he said that I needed to call "Lynksys". I said "okay", hung up, and immediately called back, went through the same scenario with another support person, who told me "you have to call Microsoft". I said "okay" hung up and immediately called back, and after maneuvering through the prompts again to get a human, I got a support person who (after suggesting that I reboot and rest my modem) listened to what I had to say, appeared to understand everything and had my internet running again in under 5 minutes. All told, however, I was on the phone for about 3 hours, and you have to realize how maddening it is when after to finally get to the prompt that says "press 7 if you are having connectivity problems", you're put on hold and every minute the recording tells you to try going to their website!! I know few people who have my patience or restraint (and it took every bit of that restraint to avoid letting out my frustration on that third support person[the one who finally helped] when she told me to try rebooting and resetting the modem) so I can just imagine what a layperson must feel. I remember having a technician come to my house to set up the internet service who kept trying different modems (saying "I can't believe all these are defective') before I intervened and set it up myself. I think that ISPs are overwhelmed with service calls, are understaffed, and suffer from a wide discrepancy of skill-sets amongst their personnel. The use of computer prompting to carry some of this burden is what gives computer prompting a bad name. I wouldn't be surprised if the actress actually did threaten the technician -- ISP support seems designed to coerce otherwise normal, well-adjusted persons to become homicidal, suicidal and paranoid.

    1. Re:ISP support a farce by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is really, really, absurd, is that once I encountered an ISP support tech that was naive enough that I was able to convince her to reboot her computer. Afterwards, I told her the problem was still present (it was ... it was a dialup pool that was ringing and not answering). She seemed to actually believe at that point that there were indeed problems that rebooting didn't help for.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  57. Annie (Kathy Bates) - Is that you ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Annie, are you back?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  58. She opened the door for him, ya know? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I might even have more sympathy for the techie, if not for the following detail: she actually opened the door for him, when he said he needed some CD from the van, and propped it open for when he returns. (Only to see him run off and drive off to the cops.)

    I'm sorry, but is there any realistic and sane way to mistake that for a genuine hostage situation? I mean, hello? Isn't that the polar opposite of _preventing_ someone from leaving?

    How would that even work, if it were a genuine hostage situation? "KK, you can go now, but please return later 'cuz you're my hostage. I'll let the door propped open for you. KTHXBYE." Or what? :P

    Surely it would count as the most incompetent kidnapping in known history.

    Look, that maybe he was close to the breaking point himself and he left an impolite customer, ok. I can live with that. Maybe the company even has a policy of leaving at the slightest perceived threat, even as a joke, as someone else suggested. Fine. Leave if you must.

    But going to the police and filing criminal charges? Nope, sorry, my sympathy for him automatically ends there. He's an arsehole who thought he can abuse the system to teach someone else a lesson. And I have no sympathy for that.

    Well, either that, or he is genuinely schizophrenic and thought that opening the door for him equals preventing him to leave. And in that case, someone put him in a nut house and on neuroleptics. Because God knows what else he might mis-interpret in surrealistic ways, and how he'll react then. Maybe at the next customer he'll think that offering him a glass of water means trying to set him on fire, or whatever. Maybe he'll end up injuring someone or himself, thinking he's fighting for his very life.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  59. Women are abusive with tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked as a second-level tech in tech support for 3 years.

    It was the female customers who were the nasty, abusive callers.

    It is well-known in tech support circles that female customers are vicious and nasty on the phone.

  60. Been in that situation before by Phybertekie · · Score: 0

    I was a field tech who serviced PC's for various brands and had to go onsite at MIT in Cambridge to replace a defective harddrive. The contract with the vendor stated to replace the parts and to format the drive just to make it bootable and that the user is responsible to install the operating system or to call the vendor to install it. After I finished the gentleman physically blocked my way and asked me to install Windows and all the drivers and restore his backup to which I said we don't do and to call the vendor and he shoved me back demanding I do that. Luckily for me a guard saw this and came over and made him move out of my way and asked if I wanted to file charges. I didn't but I called my boss and the vendor to put on record what had happened.

    1. Re:Been in that situation before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noam Chomsky sure is a pushy asshole isn't he?

  61. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first, you dont press charges in canada, you report the incident and the crown presses the charges.

    second, i know of her, and she writes great plays. and is also completely unstable. so she made a 'big' scene whatever it was...

    the halifax newspaper reported that; she hinted at having a gun' and that the tech only got out by lying to say some equipment was in his truck.

    if only she had been running linux, a virus wouldn't have driven her to the brink...

  62. Mrs. Robinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're trying to seduce me!

    Aren't you?

  63. the important news out of Halifax by ksheff · · Score: 1

    New Trailer Park Boys Movie
    August 27th, 2008 by Gilbert Seah
    GUESS WHO'S OUTTA JAIL? AGAIN!
    TRAILER PARK BOYS 2 BEGINS PRINCIPAL PHOTOGRAPHY
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Halifax - August 27, 2008 - Alliance Films is pleased to announce that the sequel to the box office record breaking TRAILER PARK BOYS - THE MOVIE commenced principal photography in Halifax on August 25th, 2008. TRAILER PARK BOYS 2 is helmed by writer-director Mike Clattenburg, co-written by John Paul Tremblay, Robb Wells, Mike Smith and Timm Hannebohm and produced by Barrie Dunn, Michael Volpe and Mike Clattenburg. Alliance Films will distribute the film across Canada.
    TRAILER PARK BOYS 2 begins with Julian, Ricky and Bubbles newly released from jail and brimming with optimism about their prospects for the future. However, when they return to Sunnyvale, they encounter a leaner and much meaner Park Supervisor Jim Lahey who has some big changes in mind for the park, changes that don't exactly go over well with the Boys, who will now face their biggest test since Grade 10.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  64. Beautiful by cheros · · Score: 1

    No THAT is class. I must try that next time, just for the hell of it.

    Sadly, most of the people at my ISP appear to have a clue. Maybe I'll try it with my bank instead.

    "No, no, I think you need to restart the mainframe. Trust me on this".

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  65. To be entirely fair, though... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    To be entirely fair, though, I don't think it's the teachers' job to teach them all possible figures of speech. That time spent together _is_ limited, if apparently large, and there are a lot of subjects which are more important than knowing the exact meaning of "I hate to hold you hostage." If you have the extra hours to teach them every single figure of speech, I'd rather you use that to teach them some extra physics instead. Or maths. Or whatever.

    Plus, would you like to be the teacher who uses that phrase in class? Especially in the terrorism hysteria in the USA?

    I mean, I can just see it, "Officer, she threatened to hold mah li'l Jimmy hostage. Mah li'l Jimmy was so affraid. Mah daddy always said, 'son', he said, 'them bastards that take hostages ain't no good people.' And I don't want no bad people near mah li'l Jimmy."

    I mean, it's bad enough that one techie understood it wrong. You don't want to bet your career on the fact that none of the tens of little illiterates will misunderstand you.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  66. crazy customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a small telco, and we've had some pretty interesting experiences. It's always funny when a customer thinks that we will stop EVERYTHING and have a technician out RIGHT NOW to fix a problem, especially when it's a problem with their computer.

    I remember one time, a technician went out to one customers house because her DSL wasn't working. When he knocked on the door, nobody answered, so he called her house, heard to phone ring, nobody answered. He then called her cell, she answered saying she would be right there. About 3 mintues later the door opened, and here is some lady standing there completely naked, and wasted as hell. The technician took a few steps back, and was just like "Mam, I'm gunna have to leave, you can call and schedule to have somebody come back out at a seperate time. When another tech was finally sent out, she jumped him and locked him in a closet. He called his sup, who called the police. Needless to say she didn't get another tech...

    Another thing that's funny, is when people threaten me that they will switch to another provider, and somehow thing that will get them better service. It always makes me laugh when they do that, because I honestly don't give a flying fuck if they switch to Verizon, especially since 80% of the time the problem is on Verizon's side or the Customer's side, and they will continue to have the problem anyway. The only way you would get a different level of service from any tech (at least where I work) is if you really piss them of, or yell at them. In which most cases we will just hang up.

  67. What's very odd is... by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

    ...there doesn't seem to be anyone wondering why a guy would be fearful of a woman? Men are taller, bigger, stronger, and more aggressive, yet he was afraid. Mmmmm'kay. He said she implied she had a gun, but according to him it wasn't on her (he couldn't see it), so why on Earth would a guy who's twice as strong as the woman be afraid? This makes no sense because generally smaller and weaker women are quite fearful of men. My guess is the woman was rude and acting like a diva and he made up the story to punish her by twisting an inconvenient choice of words. I don't buy his story at all and I believe he should be arrested for filing a false complaint.

    --
    Camping on quad since 1996.
  68. No accountability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could understand if she DID hold him hostage.

    Seems that all of these ISPs/telcoms are grounded on unaccountability, and it's no wonder that it pisses people off. I used to work on the phones for Bell Canada repair, and it was unbelievable what would happen without consequence.

    There are the CSRs:
    Hang up on someone -- it was an 'accident'.
    Transfer someone to a closed department -- oh well!
    Put someone on hold without telling them.

    Then there was the technicians:
    Tech leaves without fixing the problem -- happened all of the time.
    Techs would come at the wrong time, pretty much all of the time. Had an appointment from 2-4? Well the tech came (at 10am) and nobody was there. He left a note. Oops!
    We would have techs that would notice that the customer was home, go up to the door and not knock. They would leave a note saying that they came an nobody was there, then slink away.

    Then there was this time when I was on the phone with a customer while the tech as at their home. They needed info on their service. The tech had been there for half an hour and wasn't able (was actually just too dull) to fix the problem. While on the phone, the tech ran out the door without any of his equipment, jumped into his truck and sped away! He left the tools there and a hole in the wall!

    Later on when I moved into my own place (ans wasn't working for Bell anymore) I had Rogers service installed at my home. I had an appointment from 2-4pm, and the tech came at 9am. Luckily I was home, and even more lucky, I was awake. I know what would have happened if I didn't meet him at the door: a note to reschedule.

    There was no way that a technician, or the CSRs, were held responsible for their actions. They were completely separated processes, both outsourced to different companies.

    Holding the tech hostage seems to be a reasonable way to keep someone accountable, which would be the first time in a long time for an ISP.

  69. Kidnapping Robert Louis Stevenson by ghostgum · · Score: 1

    This allegations sounds as substantial as the story of someone being accused of kidnapping Robert Louis Stevenson, when all they did was to borrow the book. Then it was discovered that Stevenson was dead, so it wasn't just a case of kidnapping.