Slashdot Mirror


Black Screens For Unauthorized Copies of Windows

arcticstoat writes "In a bid to deter people from using pirate versions of Windows XP, Microsoft is now updating its Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) tool to introduce a few uncomfortable niggles for users of pirated versions of Windows. These include replacing the desktop wallpaper with a black screen every 60 minutes, although you can still replace it with your wallpaper of choice in the intervening period. As well as this, copies of Windows deemed to not be genuine will also have a translucent watermark above the system tray, which Microsoft calls a 'persistent desktop notification.'"

762 comments

  1. Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too close for comfort.

  2. Notifications by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some one I know just doesn't download the the WGA notification (tells it never to download when it shows up in system updates) I... I mean he wants to know if that will still work?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've wondered that too. Two of my PCs are currently using the same key. My install CDs & license keys are buried under dozens of boxes & books and I couldn't be bothered to spend 5 hours hunting for them just because XP needed a reinstall to get rid of the 120sec boot times and constant crashes.

      If not, you can use http://www.wallpaperchanger.de/ to change your wallpaper every hour and the text is hardly going to show if you leave a few icons over it.

    2. Re:Notifications by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whoever is on Slashdot right now with WGA installed(pirated copy or not) should bash their head into their monitor until their vision is nothing but a black screen.

      On a kinda related note, what's up with that fancy translucent notification? Looks like more thoughtful design went into it than into the whole UI of XP itself(which is actually highly configurable with transparent windows menus etc -- google it -- but why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?).

    3. Re:Notifications by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoever is on Slashdot right now with WGA installed(pirated copy or not) should bash their head into their monitor until their vision is nothing but a black screen.

      k. Ow...

      why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?

      What the heck is so bad about it? I've never understood this, someone please enlighten me.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:Notifications by nbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the very beginning of WGA the aim was to discourage those who don't know how to avoid it to buy a proper copy. MS has conflicting interests, which both aim at profit: Market share* and a low number of illegal copies. If they make it too hard to install a pirate copy they might encourage people to switch to free alternatives. Plus they have to sell Vista now, which gives a perfect opportunity to make it a little more annoying to run a pirate copy of XP.
      I'd hate to give them just a cent for all the MS-related problems I had during the last years, but the good news is that many people switching to Vista can now sell their OEM licenses for XP (depending on what country they live in) and there is also a very huge chance to obtain a volume-license-key in my area. I'll legalize my copy in the near future, but not because I have to, but it has become so cheap. So the one time in a month I really want to play a decent computer game I don't have to worry about such things anymore.

      *Market share usually means turnover, but in this case I'd argue that % of people using it is a far better number. Major competitors offer their OS for free or sell it along their hardware for a price which is rather abritrary. Software is a very special industry. It's not like the car industry, where fixed and variable costs have a relation...

    5. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Same here. I've got probably 3-4 proper, honest Windows XP licenses, but I keep on having to find new ones because the key either gets lost or decides it doesn't want to work anymore because Microsoft thinks I'm a thief.

      XP is the end of the line for me, because of these shenanegans. I've got an ubuntu CD ready for the day I just give up on Microsoft and their customer hating practices.

      Seriously, consider this. When I pirate, I've never been kept out of a product I steal. Never. Not once. However, I've lost thousands of dollars in software to stupid copy protection schemes as a legitimate customer. They are disincentivizing ownership. I'm acually better off stealing than paying for it.

      These idiots need a clue, and fast.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i tried once to not download the WGA. but i kept getting prompted to download it, otherwise Windows Update wouldn't continue.

    7. Re:Notifications by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, consider this. When I pirate, I've never been kept out of a product I steal. Never. Not once. However, I've lost thousands of dollars in software to stupid copy protection schemes as a legitimate customer. They are disincentivizing ownership. I'm acually better off stealing than paying for it.

      I'm honestly do not mean to troll or flamebait, but it seems there's some Ayn Randian lesson there about the trouble with ruling honest people.

      Some regimes require criminals. If there aren't enough, they keep making laws until there are.

    8. Re:Notifications by Aetuneo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I recall, Microsoft has the ability to force updates (which are downloaded in the background without telling the user). So, not downloading the WGA notifications will only work until MS realizes that users are able to do so.

      --
      Everything is subjective.
    9. Re:Notifications by eulernet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've got an ubuntu CD ready for the day I just give up on Microsoft and their customer hunting practices.

      Fixed for you.

    10. Re:Notifications by joebok · · Score: 1

      I have several computers, many of them I have updated and re-formatted - some more than once. Windows 9x, 2k, XP and even Vista. I am tech support for my family and have shepherded them from upgrades to new computers. Only once I had an issue with a windows license and a 5 minute phone call took care of that. I don't see how this will be a big deal for the vast majority of honest owners.

    11. Re:Notifications by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      [Citation Needed]

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    12. Re:Notifications by mollymoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason I never used the XP theme (I stuck with the Win2k look while I still used Windows enough to care) is that the window chrome is huge. I don't give a stuff about looks, but I do give a stuff about my screen real-estate being eaten up by "cute" windows. It's not as bad as huge transparent chrome, but it's bad enough.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    13. Re:Notifications by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the annoying factor. No one really wants to deal with someone over the phone for something as stupid and simple as a license key because the one they had decided to stop working for an arbitrary reason.

    14. Re:Notifications by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

      Pirates are not customers,no matter how ya suger coat the reason to pirate.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    15. Re:Notifications by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can certainly update the updater if it is set to check for updates but not install them until prompted. They could probablly use that mechanism to force updates to other stuff too.

      I don't think they can force updates if automatic updates are completely turned off.

      But while they probablly could force down windows genunine advantage by a number of mechanisms (use the system for updating the updater, hide it in with another update) I doubt they will. MS has a tightrope to walk, on the one hand they want to drive people from pirate MS software to legit MS software. On the other hand they don't want to drive people to non-MS software.

      Besides MS has known for ages that users can refuse WGA, it even makes descisions about what updates to give them if they do refuse it. If they wanted to play hardball I would expect them to have done so by now.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:Notifications by mrbcs · · Score: 0
      Use automatic updates. Set it to notify you before download. Uncheck the WGA when it shows up. You should be able to download and install all the rest of the updates.

      Going to their website though can be a problem. They've been know to restrict downloads until "validated". In that case, just search Google and you'll find a 3rd party download site.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    17. Re:Notifications by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      5 Minutes? Discounting Holds and such, it takes damn near 5 minutes to type in the number they give you.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    18. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      That's my point.

      If they don't smarten up, I'm going to stop being a customer, because it's more convenient to use the cracked version.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    19. Re:Notifications by rkanodia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point is, the net effect of this crap is to treat paying customers WORSE than pirates.

    20. Re:Notifications by Starayo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not quite the same thing, but I've been using a pirated copy of XP ever since, after some hardware upgrades, it refused to let me reactivate (citing I had used all my reactivations... I had never reactivated before? Yes, it was a new, genuine copy.) and forced me to ring customer service.

      Of course, this sent me to a call centre in india where I was told the "servers were down" and they were unable to help me at that time. It took me literally 5 minutes, the same time I spent waiting for them to pick up, to download and burn a new copy that had SP2 and updates slipstreamed into it that required no activation, and not once since then have I had a single problem.

      Meanwhile, I hear stories from my friends who are getting false positives on their assorted XP and Vista installs, the majority being OEM copies on dells...

      When this sort of protection is causing more of a hassle for legitimate customers rather than pirates, there is a serious problem. I highly doubt this new update to WGA will affect my install in any way, shape or form.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    21. Re:Notifications by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. I've never had problems with screen real-estate.. but then I use most apps maximized anyway.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    22. Re:Notifications by jm4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wholeheartedly agree that much of the copy protection methods out there are disincentivizing ownership, but as far as copy protection goes what Microsoft is doing here is pretty passive. They're not locking anybody out of anything. These are only a couple visual reminders that you're not using a legitimate copy. In fact, to me it seems like kind of an improvement over their typical shitty behavior towards customers. With all the hell people have raised over product activation, WGA, etc. I shudder to even think of what would happen if they used the type of DRM we see on video games. These guys routinely put in rootkits and stuff that will disable or damage hardware. These guys sell products that routinely lock out paying customers. Game developers were always terrible about this. Remember when we had to turn to page 93 in the manual and type in the fourth word of the twelfth sentence in order to get the game to start up? Why is it we basically give these assholes a free pass while jump all over Microsoft for having comparitively friendly copy protection? I think any copy protection sucks, but any meaningful argument against it is going to gain a lot more traction if we go after the worst offenders.

    23. Re:Notifications by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason I never used the XP theme (I stuck with the Win2k look while I still used Windows enough to care) is that the window chrome is huge. I don't give a stuff about looks, but I do give a stuff about my screen real-estate being eaten up by "cute" windows. It's not as bad as huge transparent chrome, but it's bad enough.

      You'll find, as you get to higher resolutions, that your annoyance at wasted real estate for things like window decorations goes down. I haven't had a second thought about using something like the Windows XP candy themes since I went over 1024x768 resolution. Actually... at really high resolutions, you're better off using a theme with more "wasted" real estate, because with smaller themes the buttons are easier to miss. I dual boot XP MCE on my laptop (1680x1050 resolution, XP for gaming, Linux for actually using it), and use the default Electric Blue theme in XP.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    24. Re:Notifications by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is actually pretty easy to defeat. Just boot into safe mode (XP Home) or regular mode (XP Pro or Media Center). Find the files in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32 called 'wgalogon.dll' and 'wgatray.exe'. Bring up the file properties, go to the security tab and remove the inherited permissions from the files (don't copy them, strip them completely). Answer yes when it asks if you're sure about this. Reboot and WGA will never bother you again. I've done this on dozens of machines and it just skips the update because its too stupid to fix permissions. The only exception to this is the Service Packs or repair installs. YMMV

      Of course nobody should have to do it in the first place but this is an example of corporate-think at it's best from our fiends in Redmond. If XP is so dead why should they be developing new WGA tricks for it anyways? Sounds to me like its them getting a bit nervous about how many people are jumping ship from Vista and pointing at 'hackers' as the problem. Again. =)

    25. Re:Notifications by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      Not to get into a dickwar, but my current desktop is 3840x1200, and I can't stand big widgets. The more content window I have on my apps, the better. Besides, with keyboard shortcuts, you don't even need a close/maximize/etc. button. 40 more pixels saved! :)

      First-run programs now just tend to remind me of this.

    26. Re:Notifications by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I've got an ubuntu CD ready for the day I just give up on Microsoft and their customer hating practices.

      Throw it away. Unless you plan to make the jump within the next two months. A Debian disk, on the other hand...

      OK, so the Debian disk may only be useful for 1 month, but it will remain useful for quite some time after that.

    27. Re:Notifications by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      5 Minutes? Discounting Holds and such, it takes damn near 5 minutes to type in the number they give you.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88

      Is that it (disguised as hexadecimal)?

    28. Re:Notifications by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you've already joined those sailing under the Jolly Roger, why would you care?

      If the company goes out of business because it annoyed legitimate customers so much that they became pirates, then I'll count that as the market working (albeit in a perverse sense).

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    29. Re:Notifications by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "XP itself(which is actually highly configurable with transparent windows menus etc -- google it -- but why the hell did microsoft keep such a flexible UI so locked down with that lame Blue and Green for so long?)"

      Because if people could make XP less ugly, there would be absolutely no demand for Vista. As it is, Vista is XP with added eye-candy. Gigabytes of it.

    30. Re:Notifications by binarybum · · Score: 1

      You'll find, as you make sweeping generalizations about people's preferences, that they'll become annoyed and you will often be wrong.

        On that note, I'm paying for more screen realestate with my large monitor, I'll be damned if I'm going to gum it up with chunky buttons.

      --
      ôó
    31. Re:Notifications by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

      Display Properties > Appearance > Advanced > Click on a title bar > select a smaller size from the size drop down... I know it takes more than 2 clicks, but hey. it's something. FTR, I also turn off MS default styling in xp... but because it's hideous.

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    32. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Make no mistake, I don't give them a free pass either.

      I won't be buying any more games from Valve, among others, because they ship games with these tiny little access codes that you absolutely have to use every time you install a game. I've got games that I bought and have never played and never will, because my girlfriend's kids lost the access codes on the tiny little piece of cardboard. Instead, either going to pass on the game, or pirate it. At least if I steal it, I know I'll be able to play it.

      There are games that do win though. The "copy protection" in World of Warcraft, for example, let me download a legitimate copy of the game, install it, and play. Astro-battle is the same. I have absolutely no problem with portable access to my favourite games.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    33. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Honestly, 99% of the time I end up grabbing custom repository lists anyway. Doesn't matter which CD I have as long as apt-get is current enough to update itself.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    34. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont matter, the crack for WGA from 2 years ago works just fine. None of their other software to test for genuine can detect the pirated copies here. I'll gladly download their WGA update, Bet $10.00 it wont affect me. (Or the 100 copies I have made and circulated telling people to "give it away to others!")

      Bet $20 that there will be a fix for the WGA update that disables that "feature" 6 minutes after it's out.

    35. Re:Notifications by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I always sized the XP/Vista borders down to minimum size using the "Advanced" button, until I found better third-party themes.

    36. Re:Notifications by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's not true. I've pirated Windows many times. Mainly because I can't find my license number or it's a pain in the ass to insert the previous version for the upgrade.

      I've done that with other programs as well. Mainly because pirates have better customer service practices than a lot of commercial outfits do.

    37. Re:Notifications by initialE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For myself it is difficult to support because the interface is not consistent. When you do telephone support it helps when the screen that you see and the screen that the user sees is the same. Instead you have the start menu items that move around, the drop down menus that auto-hide, the control panel that comes in 2 default configurations (I usually ask if they see the blue screen or the white one)...

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    38. Re:Notifications by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the size of the decorations was a backstep from the simplicity of the older 9x look, I'm operating at a resolution (1400x1050) high enough that I don't beleive it matters - compared to the days when I was running XP on 1024x768.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    39. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm honestly do not mean to troll or flamebait, but it seems there's some Ayn Randian lesson there about the trouble with ruling honest people.

      Some regimes require criminals. If there aren't enough, they keep making laws until there are.

      It also seems like there's a xkcd lessonsomewhere in there.

    40. Re:Notifications by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with WGA? I realize the world would be nicer if it wasn't there at all, but MS decided to use it, so now your choice is to use it or not. AFAIK, it's needed to have a patched system. I like the fact that my OS and many of its apps are up to date. MS can have my MAC and GUID if that means they give me free updates every week.

      If there is away "around" WGA, have fun with that. But I've already paid for my OS and the stuff I download from MS, and I don't need to waste time running virus-ridden binaries from Limewire or set up my own fake server just to use my computer.

    41. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. The police need their jobs too, so that means they need criminals to arrest, which means more and more things end up being against the law.

      Essentially it's a jobs program.

      The war on terror is one big example of it. If people felt safe (and honestly most of them are really completely safe), then the folks who protect them for a living (the police, etc) would have far less need to keep their jobs. Thus, you guarantee employment as long as people have some level of fear. Manipulate it a bit and the population learns to love being afraid and seeks it out like some kind of drug, because being comforted by their protector feels good. It's the same as eating spicy food because you want the endorphin kick. You want fear because someone will hug you and make it all better.

      There is a point when the population becomes unable to do anything but be afraid and the protectors usefulness collapses into a heap. Governments and countries tend to collapse with them.

    42. Re:Notifications by laparel · · Score: 1

      I agree, but that 5 minutes easily became 30 minutes for me and in the end I just got a crack for my Vista. :P

      My HP laptop came with a Vista product key but it turns out it isn't automatically activated online. You'd have to call it in their phone activation system. So after dialing it twice it turns out it won't work there too, you'd have to speak with a real person (a Singaporean who sounds pissed off in my case, not that it matters though). After finally getting my activation key, turns out the dude gave me the wrong one twice or I wrote it down wrong twice as it failed to activate my copy. Anyways, I proceeded to just download an activation crack and lived happily ever after, well not really. Vista is a terrible OS, might as ell have used XP if the drivers weren't a bitch. (HP recovery CD was out of the question because of the bloat included.)

      Maybe when I reformat my laptop in the next month I might just go back to XP, from what I read it's faster with games too. Kubuntu / OpenSuse would have been preferable but I'm not entirely sure that a virtualized xp can run my games without a moderate fps penalty or other windows program like Photoshop and Maya without performance problems. I'm too lazy for a dual-boot system.

      Can anyone shed light on the performance of virtualized XP under linux running games and big applications?

    43. Re:Notifications by Darundal · · Score: 1

      What? You only have to enter the code into Steam once, and after that it is entirely worthless. The game is registered to your Steam account, and next time you install it, all you have to do is log into Steam with your Steam account and then tell it to download the game. Now, lots of other companies have codes that you have to enter everytime you install the game, but Valve isn't one of them.

    44. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use this CD-key (student version volume license) for win xp pro and forget about the WGA altogether? It's been out in the intertubes for years and it still works flawlessly. Better than running some crack made by an outstanding pirate.

      V2C47-MK7JD-3R89F-D2KXW-VPK3J

    45. Re:Notifications by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Some of us have limited-enough bandwidth to appreciate the still-the-latest-version packages on the CD.

    46. Re:Notifications by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative
    47. Re:Notifications by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 0

      The only lesson to be drawn from Ayn Rand's life and works, is that novelists generally make lousy philosophers, unless they shed their storytelling, melodramatic skins and adopt some intellectual rigor.

      Jean-Paul Sartre made the transition, but Ayn Rand spectacularly failed.

    48. Re:Notifications by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      You can just gift the kid the game on steam, bypassing you a trip to the store. Or buy it on steam to begin with. It also drops the price of the game by $7-8 (or more, if you live in a rural area) by shortening the number of trips to the store by 1. You also have the advantage of being able to reinstall the game any time anywhere, with no worries about disc scratches because - there are none!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    49. Re:Notifications by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      If I have a legitimate SW and it shows to my friends, colleagues or worst, to my customers a "visual reminder that I'm not using a legitimate copy" I'm going to get mad. Mad enough to sue.

      Just think about a presentation in a conference ...

    50. Re:Notifications by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I only run windows because when I put together the system, voice chat in TF2 didn't work under wine (pretty sure it works now, I know it does in CS:S) and now I'm too lazy to reformat and install Ubuntu proper. I only use the computer for firefox, gmail (firefox) and steam games. I'm sure lots of other people only use windows because it meets a basic need and would gladly switch to something free if it were more convenient at install. If microsoft dies because people are pirating an OS they don't even sell anymore causes them to go under, so be it. Vendors will move to a more viable, free platform (likely linux). XP is only a vehicle I'm required to play my games and I have no issue "pirating" a copy. The value of the OS has decreased sharply, and if microsoft wants to continue charging above market value, so be it.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    51. Re:Notifications by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

      ...it seems there's some Ayn Randian lesson there about the trouble with ruling honest people...

      And then before you know it you're chasing after little girls with huge syringes that are protected by big dudes in diving suits with drills for arms. Slippery slope.

    52. Re:Notifications by MarkKB · · Score: 1

      If XP is so dead why should they be developing new WGA tricks for it anyways?

      They're not. They're updating it to bring it in line with what Windows Vista SP1 WGA does. Nice try, though. :)

    53. Re:Notifications by iamacat · · Score: 1

      That is why, in my case, game companies are losing competition with themselves a few years back. There are thousands more DOS through Windows 98 games that I can finish over my lifetime. Even a hundred of them at a time will only take negligible space on my upgraded 300GB Macbook Pro hard drive. Copy protection methods, including ones involving manuals, have been thoroughly researched, OCRed and cracked - no need to hunt for CDs or serial numbers. Parallels or DOSBox cover all my graphics needs without having to reboot to Bootcamp or worse be tied to a desktop. As for graphics, well - if the game took $100M to produce, how long do you think it will take me to get up to speed to play? With a wife and a kid, I would rather try something in magenta, cyan and white if it means I can actually play the damn thing.

      I find much the same problems with Vista vs Windows 2000, except that, unlike games, there are many modern alternatives and most of them do not use DRM.

    54. Re:Notifications by delvsional · · Score: 1

      Whoever is on Slashdot right now with WGA installed(pirated copy or not) should bash their head into their monitor until their vision is nothing but a black screen.

      I think I have WGA installed. I don't know. How do you tell? without booting into windows? Haven't booted into windows in so long I don't know if I can find it. hold on let me see if it's still there....

      nah screw it...

      --
      Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
    55. Re:Notifications by Allador · · Score: 1

      Awesome :)

    56. Re:Notifications by zsau · · Score: 1

      If it's so inconvenient for you already, why don't you just switch to Ubuntu already?

      --
      Look out!
    57. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should wait to burn that Ubuntu CD until you actually need it. I'm sure it will be updated a time or two before then ;)

    58. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      What annoys me is that I have a laptop with a Dell OEM XP Pro license. I don't have the Dell OEM XP CD. I still want to be able to use that license. However, because I don't have the OEM CD, I can't. I'm stuck using a second legitimate XP Pro license for that machine because of it.

      It's the downside to OEM cd keys.

    59. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Valve? Once you enter the CD Key into Steam, you never have to look at it again, ever, even if you uninstall the game.

      Other games... as far as I'm aware, most game manufacturers are willing to get you a new key as long as you have the original game CDs (not burned copies). Just make a text file in your Documents folder with all your CD keys, and put a backup somewhere. Print out a copy to keep in your CD case. You do have a CD case, right?

    60. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Why? Those of us that don't have time to endlessly tweak wine and/or pay for Cedega need Windows to be able to play our games. Or use Visual Studio (which, I submit, has little competition among C++ IDEs) for various projects, including open source ones. Don't worry, though, I dual-boot with Gentoo ;)

      Windows has its uses; WGA has never done anything bad to me; I use legitimate copies of Windows.

      As for the blue and green theme... I hate it with a passion. The only one I can really stand is the Windows Classic theme.

    61. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I want to be able to use Windows with apps in non-maximized mode, but without window border snapping it's extremely unlikely I'll ever do so. It's far too much work to line up window borders.

    62. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      My problem with wine is that while CS:S et al run, I only get half the performance as in Windows, and Windows I only average 30fps... CS:S is kinda hard to play at ~15fps.

      I use nvidia's drivers, so I would expect that the graphics performance would be approximately the same as in Windows.

      Oh, that, and the Steam Community Overlay doesn't work under wine. I use that a lot.

      If that stuff can be improved, I'd definitely boot into Linux a lot more than I do.

    63. Re:Notifications by novakreo · · Score: 1

      They are disincentivizing ownership.

      Why would you use that horrible marketspeak term instead of a simpler word like discouraging?

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    64. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      Please don't post here anymore.

    65. Re:Notifications by bitrex · · Score: 0, Troll

      That fucked up bitch never wrote a word that contained a "lesson" other than her pissed offness at the Bolsheviks and their abortion of a regime that looted her father's drugstore. Rand's slapdick followers like Alan Greenspan have been pulling her LF capitalism philosophy for decades now and have led us into the best financial crisis since the 1930s.

    66. Re:Notifications by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      There is an even easier way to defeat this nag.

      http://www.ubuntu.com/

    67. Re:Notifications by Tatsh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before I begin, let us not forget that WGA has found many computers with 'invalid licences' when indeed the computers were licensed fine. Beyond that, people can have multiple computers with the same OEM key activated, which causes problems with Microsoft's WGA servers, and can potentially cause invalidations. Otherwise legitimate people do not know the EULA and/or care for it. As for pirates, just find another solution or move to Linux; you will not regret it. I used to be an all-Windows person, pirating software, and everything. I thought Keygens were amazing; I thought the warez scene was amazing. Truth be told, the 'scene' is simply the result of things like said in this article, but if anything, the 'scene' should be promoting free alternatives instead of just cracking software all day. All that effort spent cracking some copy protection could be spent making a program that does the same thing.

      The more a volume licence key gets used (it ALWAYS gets passed during Windows Update) the more chance that Microsoft will blacklist it. That is what happened to FCKGW and a number of others.

      As for me, I am a technician on the side and I get volume licence keys from places I visit but I NEVER share them with anyone. So I have like 2 computers (one is mine, however I'm on Linux most of the time anyway; also it's a laptop and has a COA on the bottom anyway) in the house running on volume licence that always pass WGA, but I never allow the daemon to be installed, just the ActiveX control now required to go onto the Windows Update site. Technically, I am OEM licensed, but I would rather not be bothered by WGA so I just use VL keys that I never share with anyone.

      The key posted above is definitely going to be blacklisted soon enough. I would stop while ahead.

      Here's a method to be somewhat legit: Find an OEM key (just look at the side of someone's computer or bottom of someone's laptop for the COA), reinstall OEM Windows with that key, and activate online (which works a lot) or use the phone call method which is now all automated, no representative. Use a pay phone if you are paranoid. You just say 'This is the only computer this copy is installed to', etc. It works!

      Why does this work online? Because Windows activation right now is as so: If the time since the original OEM hardware was activated exceeds 120 days (might be 60), then you may activate an OEM key on ANY new hardware. Violates licence? Yes. Care? No. Microsoft knows? Actually, yes.

      As for businesses, I URGE you to find other solutions than deploying Windows installations plus whatever software. Microsoft is only getting more draconian as time goes along. 3D developers, Maya does run on Linux and Mac. Finance people, Quicken has an online version accessible with any browser. Proprietary software yes, but you can use it without worrying that your OS is just going to randomly shut off because it found (and many times has been wrong) that your OS is 'pirated'.

    68. Re:Notifications by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      How old is your computer??? I get 14 fps "rock solid" on de_dust2 on a 2004 era throw-away quality (free to me) dell lattitude budget laptop in ubuntu 8.04. I'll admit I upgraded the ram to a whopping 768 mb though. I didn't try out the steam overlay though -that is a bummer; I do use that a lot, lately as an aim/gchat substitute.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    69. Re:Notifications by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Note to valve if you're listening - open up the chat protocol! I want steam text/voice chat on my blackberry/iphone!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    70. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info. Won't make a difference for me at the present time though. I havd a dual boot setup here : WinXP and Sidux. Windows is never allowed to access the internet. I will be getting cable internet in a few days. I have done the following:
      Set a static IP address in WinXP for the 2 computers that will be connected to the router.
      Block ineternet access for those IP addresses in the router.
          I only use WinXP for some games that won't run (or won't run well) in Linux. My copies of XP are legitimate, but I have had trouble with WGA mistakenly thinking that they are not, like many others have.

      I have even applied an activation crack, as I am tired of having to re-activate every time I install or replace hardware. Its just too much BS that ONLY hurts legitimate buyers of their products!

      TTYL

    71. Re:Notifications by H310iSe · · Score: 1

      to change file rights in XP pro don't forget to first turn off 'simple file sharing' (on by default) in windows explorer tools: folder options: view [tab]: near the bottom you'll see the option.

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    72. Re:Notifications by vic-traill · · Score: 1

      ... Reboot and WGA will never bother you again.

      Okay, that's not bad - skip update(s) you don't like. How about just skipping *all* updates? Here's my approach - we'll see if it turns out I'm a moron, or not ...

      Install FF. Never run IE (any rev) again. Install NoScript. Be fascistic about not running JS on pages. Go to Black Viper's page ( http://www.blackviper.com/ ). You'll find others beyond that. Use BV and others to turn off every damn service you can manage. And then turn off a few more. :)

      Put all data you give any sort of a kentucky about into a Truecrypt partition. I should probably change this to full disk encryption using Truecrypt. Get the sysinternals utilities so you can tell what's going on in your system. Get a Rootkit Revelaer-type utility. Install Avast! (optional if you're not a bonehead about running shit you shouldn't). Ditto for Spybot. Run HijackThis on a regular interval.

      Install and run Open Office instead of MS Office.

      Put stuff you care about - like on-line banking - into an environment you have more trust in. For example, for on-line banking, I launch a vmplayer Damn Small Linux virtual machine that suspends on shutdown, so when it fires up it is running FF and has loaded my bank's page (takes about 11 steamboats to launch and let me start entering my bankcard number).

      I run behind a Tilgin broadband router.

      Windows Firewall is shutdown (in fact it won't run because of required services behind it being shut down - thanks, BV). Automatic Updates are also turned off.

      Or, if you can, avoid this hassle and dump Windows. For example, switch to Ubuntu. I have *one* app left, and it is getting converted to a web interface, so Ubuntu here we come. And yes. I am aware that Ubuntu will come with its own administrative overhead.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    73. Re:Notifications by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Worse - I pay for things, and then use the pirate tools to make them work. How long do people hold out when they realise since they're pirating anyway, they might as well just stop paying to be fecked up the arse?

      I came very close to converting my legit vista install to a SLIC-bios one after genuine disadvantage choked after the boot process on a network card driver update from windows update. It'd boot, then claim I wasn't genuine and black screen me. I'd reboot, be forced to reactivate, and pass with flying colours - I'm genuine! Then as soon as it got to the desktop, it would promptly fail genuine disadvantage again.

      You know how I know it was the network card driver it didn't like? Process of elimination and system restore. The error message in the event log was completely fecking useless.

      Genuine disadvantage pisses off legitimate customers only. Pirates just use SLIC bios patches, or the fake bios one - vista is easier to pirate than XP was!

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    74. Re:Notifications by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      you might find that when you try Ubuntu, you start appreciating windows xp. Specifically the way it 'just works' with a huge variety of hardware.

      I tried to switch recently and just ran into a series of problems which are presumably related to ubuntu not liking my 4yr old laptop.

      The forums were moderately unhelpful - folks just wanted to assume that I had some standard problems (which I didn't) and so my threads disappeared.

      The only updates to my threads recently have been a few folks piling on with 'we have that problem too' or 'yes, some folks have that problem, it doesn't seem to be fixed'.

      I have ended up with a much older verison of ubuntu which doesn't support wpa (or at least not without much config editing and command line tomfoolery - and I don't know if that would work or not)

      It's great that folks build Ubuntu and give it away - but for me it some way away from being able to reliably replace Windows XP

    75. Re:Notifications by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with WGA? I realize the world would be nicer if it wasn't there at all, but MS decided to use it, so now your choice is to use it or not. AFAIK, it's needed to have a patched system. I like the fact that my OS and many of its apps are up to date. MS can have my MAC and GUID if that means they give me free updates every week.

      If there is away "around" WGA, have fun with that. But I've already paid for my OS and the stuff I download from MS, and I don't need to waste time running virus-ridden binaries from Limewire or set up my own fake server just to use my computer.

      I agree.. WGA is a great feature. Life changing in fact. Almost as good as Vista in it's own right. And you are absolutely correct. The world is a much nicer place without WGA.

      It's what got me to give Linux a really serious try. And I have never been happier with an OS. My PC is more responsive, I have access to lots of apps to play with that are just a few clicks away. I don't have to carefully research freeware apps before I install them in case they are really spyware.. No annoying firewall or virus scanner update notice popping up while I am playing a game and crashing it. What's not to like.

      Now my main PC is running Fedora, I bought an N800 running a custom cut down Linux distro, which thanks to the latest OS update even plays Youtube videos directly from the site with few frame drops and downloads the same videos into a specialised client for local flawless play. and I'm waiting for a laptop to arrive in a day or two that will be Windows for a few days while I make sure it is the right one for me, but it will have some version of Linux installed too as soon as I buy a new hard drive. My one remaining Windows box will eventually be replaced with a Linux PVR, and may or may not end up as a game box/print server for the existing Windows games that don't work under WINE. Now I don't have to even contemplate dealing with potential headaches from Vista, or even worry about WGA being set off if I replace faulty hardware or upgrade. And my box of install disks for various apps and drivers has shrunk to a single DVD and an internet connection.

      Have fun using Microsoft's Windows. I'll stay with the penguin and use my computers with my copy of Linux in the way I choose.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    76. Re:Notifications by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've got probably 3-4 proper, honest Windows XP licenses, but I keep on having to find new ones because the key either gets lost or decides it doesn't want to work anymore because Microsoft thinks I'm a thief.

      Working with literally 100s of thousands of users, if you have a legit key, no matter what, MS will honor your key. (Even after a 'silly' amount of times, call them duringin activation and they will fix the issue with your key and everything is fine.)

      Even if you lose your key, if you registered your product, they can look up your registration history and fix the missing ID problem.

      So if you are 'legally' using Windows and using 'stolen' IDs, then you either don't know better or are lying.

      Knowledge is power. MS had never been picky about users with valid keys or installs.

      The latest moves in the WGA shows that MS is stopping the consumer end persecution and focusing on the original OEM piracy targets.

      Even if you have a stolen version of Windows, a changing wallpaper or watermark is not a big price to pay, and you can do all the testing or whatever you would use it for.

    77. Re:Notifications by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      "These idiots need a clue, and fast." Why, they are printing money hand over fist as it is right now. They are highly profitable companies.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    78. Re:Notifications by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Why does it seem to be considered evil for companies to try and make money. They are all blatent and open about their objectives. They should do what is in the interest of preserving and growing what they have. It is their nature. I would not complain about a fox hunting a rabbit either. It is what it does. We all know it. It is not evil, it is the nature of things.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    79. Re:Notifications by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      NOOOO!!!!!!
      Just use Jellybean Keychanger (google it)and all will be well!
      There is also an official MS kb about changing product keys and IDs.
      Load the latest updated XP home/pro and change it to a valid key. You can't swap a pro for a home key though or vice-versa.
      I do it when I refurbish formatted PCs with 'stickers' on them but no XP media.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    80. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found that you just need to turn down the font size for the title bars and then the title bars shrink to Win 2k equivalent size.

      Unfortunately you're still stuck with the fugly Start button which can't be resized (as far as I know).

    81. Re:Notifications by introspekt.i · · Score: 1

      Valve's copy protection is some work, but I put up with it because TF2....IS...JUST...THAT...GOOD.

    82. Re:Notifications by mqduck · · Score: 1

      The reason I never used the XP theme (I stuck with the Win2k look while I still used Windows enough to care)

      Technically, it's the Windows 98 theme.

      --
      Property is theft.
    83. Re:Notifications by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Manipulate it a bit and the population learns to love being afraid and seeks it out like some kind of drug

      Then arrest them for "possession of fear" so you can take their houses and cars! Brilliant!

    84. Re:Notifications by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know the virtues of Linux. I use it, and OS X, at home along with XP, because they all have their own advantages. My comment about the world being nicer was that it would be nice if we lived in a world where MS trusted us (and likewise, we paid for all of our OSes) but that just doesn't happen.

      My post was referring to the parent who suggested running WGA was stupid even if you have a legal copy of Windows. I just wanted to get the reasoning behind that, because that means you don't get any updates. As you pointed out, your OS doesn't even play Youtube videos without an update. Installing any flavor and not running apt-get (or whatever) isn't the best advice IMHO.

    85. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like placing the furniture over the carpet stains. Now go buy some more beer ... I'll pay you back next week

    86. Re:Notifications by nbert · · Score: 1

      I was simply pointing out that in MS' case the relation between piracy and profit is not as simple as they want us to believe. To a certain extend piracy is actually helping them to sustain their monopoly. Every measure they have taken to fight piracy came with a deliberate loophole to circumvent it.

      I don't judge this behavior in terms of good or evil. Of course they can't admit in public that they rather see a pirate copy of Windows than a legit one from a competitor, but that's exactly the case in many market segments.

    87. Re:Notifications by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      Also the trick was to modify your hosts file, adding
      genuine.microsoft.com 127.0.0.1
      I don't know if this still works either.

    88. Re:Notifications by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

      We have ~600 PC's with Office 2003 and XP. We have proper licenses for these. As a group we have many hundreds of hours working with Microsoft to get the licensing happy. All of a sudden they don't like 10 of our Office 2003 keys (we don't have a VLK.) or 10 of our OEM XP installs. Hundreds of hours.

      All for what? This should make Windows cost less, right? Less piracy so the price goes down?

      Anyway, my PC at work is Windows. But my PC is a MacBook Pro. I've given up on Windows. I hardly ever use it anymore except at work. I find it amazing that I no longer have to spend my time trying to get my PC to work. I just do my work (or play.) and I still get amazed how quickly I get it done. No driver issues. No BSOD's because of a dirty DVD/CD. No 15 minutes after boot up waiting for patching Windows, antivirus patching, Java, Adobe, Flash checking for updates, Defender scan, spybot search and destroy scan.. I just get to work.

      Microsoft - rebuild the OS from scratch removing the backward compatibility layers that screw you over - and then provide backwards compatibility in a VM of XP/Vista that runs under your hypervisor. My .02.

    89. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this would get -1 Overrated.

      You are still under the gun.

    90. Re:Notifications by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      When you first got the laptop, it had a copy of the CD ISO on it and a utility for burning it onto a real CD. If you have since wiped and reinstalled, you are buggered but if not, you may still be able to make some instal media.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    91. Re:Notifications by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      It's the annoying factor. No one really wants to deal with someone over the phone for something as stupid and simple as a license key because the one they had decided to stop working for an arbitrary reason.

      I'd take it a step further and add that it's also the ridiculous factor. If a machine has already been validated once, why is there a need to do it again? I don't know of too many people who would go through the trouble of acquiring a legal copy of a Microsoft product, only to replace it with a pirated copy.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    92. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'll have to look into that then. If that's the case, then Valve will be back on my good list.

      I'm just pissed off because I lost an entire Half-life+expansions pack because of that idiotic code business.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    93. Re:Notifications by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Actually it's worse than that. XP is not really dead because most of the pirates are not going to bother to upgrade. If they can annoy enough people to actually go out and buy legal copies of windows then they can force these people to buy vista. Since XP is no longer being sold any more that is.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    94. Re:Notifications by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has to have "friendly protection", because that is how they got their monopoly. As soon as they start doing full checks, they will lose marketshare, especially now that Apple/Linux competition is clearly present and market-ready. From an open-source promoting point of view, the more they start nagging, the better.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    95. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because if you use a word marketing people understand, maybe they'll realise how stupid what they're doing is.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    96. Re:Notifications by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Windows XP doesn't "just work".

      I've installed linux many times on many different pieces of hardware. More often than not, especially on oem machines, you put the CD in, hit install, and you're ready to roll. All your hardware works, and you can just start using your computer. With Windows XP, you'd better have all your drivers available on a CD, because your network, video, sound, and input devices will all be yellow question marks in the device manager when you reboot. Not just that, you'd better hope they work as expected. I just re-installed XP recently, and the sound on my nforce still doesn't work. The drivers just didn't catch on.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    97. Re:Notifications by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      But not enough markets to outweigh the equation. They are doing business cases to evaluate these decisions. I am sure there is ROI figures for various scenarios..

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    98. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      This particular laptop is near five years old, and it's a hand-me-down from my dad's company. It has been reformatted several times, passing through XP and several versions of Linux and back to XP. It's theoretically possible he still has the OEM CD lying around but really it's not worth my time... Yay for MSDNAA!

    99. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, consider this. When I pirate, I've never been kept out of a product I steal. Never. Not once. However, I've lost thousands of dollars in software to stupid copy protection schemes as a legitimate customer. They are disincentivizing ownership. I'm acually better off stealing than paying for it.

      Go ahead, mod me a troll but, I always find it amazing how often I hear this argument on Slashdot. Yet, in the entire outside world (yeah, the real world) I 've never actually met anyone who could make the same claim.

      Hmmm . . . it makes me think you people are nothing but a bunch of fucking liars desperately trying to justify their thieving ways, looking for comfort in their peers' support.

      No, wait - not here on Slashdot, that'd just be silly, wouldn't it?

    100. Re:Notifications by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I purchased my laptop in April 2007. It has a 2 GHz C2D T7200, 2 GB RAM, and a Geforce Go 7300 (128 dedicated, 128 shared). If Windows' performance were poor, I'd suspect the video card as the culprit, but my Windows performance is fine.

      I tried this on a system running Gnome on Gentoo Linux 2.6.24 with CFLAGS="-O2 -march=nocona -fomit-frame-pointer". I suppose it's possible I had some video driver setting somewhere set wrong, and one particular version of nvidia-drivers crashed my computer constantly... but who knows. I know in Windows, nVidia's drivers don't work, I have to use Dell's. Oh well. I'll try wine again when I build my desktop after I graduate and become (to quote a friend) a "highly paid software developer with moolah to spare".

    101. Re:Notifications by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      I haven't, and I don't. I agree with your conclusions - witness the falling profits of Big Music as they struggle to understand why 'hit you til you love us' hasn't proven to be a successful strategy with regards to potential customers.

    102. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, we should not criticse microsoft anymore until we have thoroughly criticised game drm

    103. Re:Notifications by Splab · · Score: 1

      I thought they removed the limit on amount of reactivations you could do. I've installed my legal version of XP several times - even on different computers (upgrade paths) without a hitch.

      WGA has never been a problem for me personally, but we did have an issue at an old job where it at some point decided our laptops where no longer legit, that was a bloody pain to fix.

    104. Re:Notifications by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's on my list of things that drive me nuts when I boot into Windows (#1 being alt-dragging). There's gotta be add-ons that do this kind of stuff (like mouse focus), but I'm always too lazy to go searching. I'd rather just whine about it forever. :-)

    105. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without WGA, your "friend" won't be able to get non-critical updates, nor will he be able to install many of the free additional software apps offered on the Windows Update or Microsoft Update sites. IMHO Windows Defender, WMP 11 and Private Folder are easily lived without, but some may actually want those apps. (Can't imagine *why* though)

      However, since I have read reports of so many false positives and false negatives (IIRC someone actually managed to get an install of Linux to validate as Genuine Windows!) there's just GOT to be some kind of work-around or tool to circumvent the whole WGA nonsense, maybe many such tools. IMHO, the only thing the WGA does is encourage the average user to go legit by treating everybody has a potential thief. Anyone with even a modicum of cracking skills will barely notice that it even exists.

    106. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, mod me a troll but, I always find it amazing how often I hear this argument on Slashdot. Yet, in the entire outside world (yeah, the real world) I 've never actually met anyone who could make the same claim.

      That's because you've never met anyone in the real world. You should probably get out of your [mom's] basement more often.

    107. Re:Notifications by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Alt-dragging? That creates a shortcut... those are handy, actually. Alt-drag creates a shortcut, ctrl-drag copies it, shift-drag moves it [handy when the default action isn't what you want, and less trouble than left-dragging and clicking the choice in the menu].

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    108. Re:Notifications by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Technically, it's the Windows Classic style.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    109. Re:Notifications by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Easier..

      Google "xpy", download it and run it.

      Tick the "remove WGA" box.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    110. Re:Notifications by nbert · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I still don't see your point. I'm sure they calculate all kinds of ratios, but how does that support any kind of argument?

    111. Re:Notifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone was commenting about the colors the other day and I couldnt for the life of me figure out what they were talking about. (Blue/Green)

      Because the first thing I do after an install is turn it to the "Best Performance" setting which turns themes off ala Win2k.

    112. Re:Notifications by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Try GotoAssist. Then you can remote their screen from anywhere. They're having a free beta right now. I don't work for them. I use it though, and it's cool.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    113. Re:Notifications by initialE · · Score: 1

      doesn't xp already have remote assistance? but the point is that often i support people who are either hopelessly firewalled or not even connected to the internet. all you have to help them is your voice.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    114. Re:Notifications by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      The suggestion is that allowing the piracy is a financially better solution. I am suggesting they look at both sides of the equation and they disagree. I trust the numbers of someone with greed and mondy motivating their research over the motivation of idealistic individuals. These companies have a real inerest in knowing if it is a good or bad thing for the bottom line. They put time and effort into figuring it out at the dollar/euro level.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    115. Re:Notifications by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Oh, I know the virtues of Linux. I use it, and OS X, at home along with XP, because they all have their own advantages. My comment about the world being nicer was that it would be nice if we lived in a world where MS trusted us (and likewise, we paid for all of our OSes) but that just doesn't happen.

      That is a bigger problem than you might think. And not only in the computer industry. Any market where a supplier sees themselves as indispensable you have a big problem. This leads to contempt for customers, and bad service.

      My post was referring to the parent who suggested running WGA was stupid even if you have a legal copy of Windows. I just wanted to get the reasoning behind that, because that means you don't get any updates. As you pointed out, your OS doesn't even play Youtube videos without an update. Installing any flavour and not running apt-get (or whatever) isn't the best advice IMHO.

      The post I was replying to was..

      What's wrong with WGA? I realize the world would be nicer if it wasn't there at all, but MS decided to use it, so now your choice is to use it or not. AFAIK, it's needed to have a patched system. I like the fact that my OS and many of its apps are up to date. MS can have my MAC and GUID if that means they give me free updates every week.

      If there is away "around" WGA, have fun with that. But I've already paid for my OS and the stuff I download from MS, and I don't need to waste time running virus-ridden binaries from Limewire or set up my own fake server just to use my computer.

      I freely admit I may have misunderstood your point, but it seemed to me that it was dismissive of the potential harm of the WGA mechanism, and supporting the concept that Microsoft were giving you updates as some kind of favour.. Which I strongly disagree with.

      Every OS and just about every non trivial app needs to be updated. It isn't a reward for being a good little consumer and buying the product. It is a mechanism that allows software companies to release software while they are still working on it. Vista could have taken years more to get out the door if it had to be ready to use on day one.

      There are ways to get around WGA, and still get updates, but like you, I can't be bothered playing follow the hacks with such mechanisms, so I decided to say goodbye to Windows, and as I said, much better experience. And how can you fail a test you never take. Microsoft don't dare to forbid access to important updates, so people can keep downloading the important stuff and ignoring the WGA for as long as possible. The more people who don't use WGA the better.

      If more users objected, and acted on it, this wouldn't be a problem, as illustrated by the quick Microsoft climbdown on limiting the number of activations for retail copies of Vista, or the decision to make IE7 a non WGA checked item. If they are not supporting pirates, why bother making IE7, a premium download, available to the people who didn't pay for their copy of Windows?

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    116. Re:Notifications by nbert · · Score: 1

      Ah, now I get it (even though I still disagree). It would be really, really interesting to know what models they use. Like I said in the original post software is a really special business. I'd love to work in controlling for such a company for a couple of months.

      Nevertheless I base my argument on observation. Whenever they make it harder to use a pirate copy they release a fix which makes it possible to keep the copy going. For example when they blocked the famous FCKGW key in SP1 it took a week till they put a knowledge base article online describing the steps to change the key. Since then they have played this game numerous times: First they release an update which doesn't work with compromised volume keys, then they wait for the public outcry and provide a fix which simply makes it a little bit more annoying to run a pirate copy. If they really wanted to completely stop piracy they would handle this differently (and I'm sure their market share would drop at least in developing countries).

    117. Re:Notifications by mrbcs · · Score: 1

      Like I give a fuck coward.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    118. Re:Notifications by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      They are basing it on profit. They see higher profit in going with what they are going with. I say more power to them. If it works, fine, if not, then they sink and they can look for new profit models ot examine.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  3. PFFFFFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Only fucking retards use WGA on a pirated copy. Good luck with your wild goose chase, Microsoft!

    1. Re:PFFFFFT by wiz31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh crap, get ready for another wave of "omg where is the start button" questions on the Ubuntu message boards.

      --
      /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
    2. Re:PFFFFFT by iago-vL · · Score: 0

      Or people, like some elderly friends of my family, who were duped and don't understand why Microsoft is harassing them.

    3. Re:PFFFFFT by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a good thing. Treat the noobs respectfully. Ultimately it's lack of respect from MS that's driving them away. If they get that same attitude from Ubuntu they'll just label you as asses and go back to MS.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:PFFFFFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've gotten past it before. Required just a registry key and a different computer.

    5. Re:PFFFFFT by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Modded troll or not, I have to agree. Smart users don't even have WGA installed on their legal copies of XP (yes, I like to think I'm one of those). I don't want a background process eating my machine's resources just so Microsoft can do the electronic equivalent of a strip-search every 10 minutes. If it doesn't actually benefit me it gets the hell off of my computer, fast.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    6. Re:PFFFFFT by chubs730 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a tough job handling the ubuntu IRC channel. The other day some guy was asking how to maximize firefox. We told him to click the box in the upper right corner, and he didn't understand. So someone asked what version he was running, and he gave the output of firefox -v (or whatever command it is for version). It was baffling that he could use the command line but not maximize the window. I think (hope) he was joking. Or maybe it was Richard Stallman.

    7. Re:PFFFFFT by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It's a tough job handling the ubuntu IRC channel. The other day some guy was asking how to maximize firefox. We told him to click the box in the upper right corner, and he didn't understand.

      You told him to click on the "close window" button? No wonder he didn't understand...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:PFFFFFT by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      The button with the box would be the maximize button. Yes, we explained it clearly.

    9. Re:PFFFFFT by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Switch them to KDE and the so-called "Start" button is right where they are used to... along with the taskbar, tray, and clock too.

    10. Re:PFFFFFT by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Modded troll or not, I have to agree. Smart users don't even have WGA installed on their legal copies of XP (yes, I like to think I'm one of those). I don't want a background process eating my machine's resources just so Microsoft can do the electronic equivalent of a strip-search every 10 minutes. If it doesn't actually benefit me it gets the hell off of my computer, fast.

      It doesn't actually run in the background. It does the authenticity check at startup, and it vets your computer when you try to install an update which requires authentication, and that's it. And there are actual, honest-to-goddess important updates that won't install without such authentication.

      *shrugs* but I guess I'm not what you'd consider a "smart" user, in that I choose to let it do its rigamorole on the 4 computers I have running Windows... my laptop, which dual boots with XP MCE, my HTPC which is running Vista Ultimate (both came from MSDN), and my parents' laptops, running XP Home and Vista Home Premium respectively.

      Incidentally... none of those systems have ever had issues, performance or otherwise, with WGA. I'm not saying that it doesn't screw over legitimate users. But I am saying that I've never seen an issue with it, and that the ability to install security and stability updates that you couldn't otherwise install outweighs the marginal increase in boot time, which is about the only thing you actually notice when you install/activate WGA.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    11. Re:PFFFFFT by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 1

      because ubuntu is obviously the only other os in existance right?

    12. Re:PFFFFFT by budword · · Score: 1

      We are asses. But what we don't do is take their money and THEN fuck with them.

    13. Re:PFFFFFT by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it was Richard Stallman.

      Nah, Stallman wouldn't use Firefox. He can just run W3 right in his shell, Emacs.

    14. Re:PFFFFFT by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      I believe only *Optional* updates and non critical updates are not available without WGD*. I never install WGD* on my personal machines, but I do however manage the updates for our machines at work, and all the critical security/stability updates do go through.

      * Windows Genuine Disadvantage

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    15. Re:PFFFFFT by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      what, noone is game to mod this informative? ~

      (~ denotes sarcasm, as per the "new punctuiation update")

    16. Re:PFFFFFT by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was a Mac user who was unfamiliar with the 'maximize' concept ?

    17. Re:PFFFFFT by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Smart users don't even have WGA installed on their legal copies of XP (yes, I like to think I'm one of those).

      Why do you say you might want to think you're a legal copy of XP?

    18. Re:PFFFFFT by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...they'll just label you as asses and go back to MS..

      Unless they were smart and bought a computer that "just works" a Mac.

      --
      All theory is gray
    19. Re:PFFFFFT by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      The short answer to his question would have been "Push F11", and then work forward to introduce mouse functionality.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    20. Re:PFFFFFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh crap, get ready for another wave of "omg where is the start button" questions on the Ubuntu message boards.

      You want a bigger market share. Don't complain about newbies.

    21. Re:PFFFFFT by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      He just wanted it to be a normal maximization, not full screen. I'm fairly certain he'd be horribly confused if he had "no way" of getting back to IRC.

    22. Re:PFFFFFT by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Two words most people can understand; "Toggle Switch".

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    23. Re:PFFFFFT by Technician · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, get ready for another wave of "omg where is the start button" questions on the Ubuntu message boards.

      Finding the start button isn't the problem. It's pointing them to the way the fix the broken MP3 playback and explaining the lack of the registry that isn't so easy.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    24. Re:PFFFFFT by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't actually run in the background.

      Ok, ya got me there. But I remember when everyone was oh-so-shocked when it was revealed that WGA checked your machine every time it started up. Before then MS claimed that wasn't the case. My point here is that you don't know for certain what it is doing -- MS has lied about it before. (I'd link you to the /. threads but I'd need to be a subscriber to search back that far; I'd bet you could find them with a search engine though).

      Incidentally... none of those systems have ever had issues, performance or otherwise, with WGA.

      Yet. Hopefully you never will.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    25. Re:PFFFFFT by zsau · · Score: 1

      It was possible it just didn't work. The problem I've had with Linux support for the last few years (five or so by now I guess ...) is that if something doesn't work, everyone assumes it's the simple stuff that's not working, and when you tell them it's not you get at best a deafening silence, and at worse an assumption that you're insane and/or you've broken your computer. Which you might've done, but given Linux is Linux you'd think the whole point of the text support would be to fix that sort of a problem.

      --
      Look out!
    26. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Having several friends who use Macs regularly, one of which worked in a Mac store repairing machines, I am sufficiently convinced that Macs don't "just work" any more than Windows or Linux machines, especially now that the hardware is effectively the same.

      Will people please stop practically quoting the "Mac vs. PC" commercials as if they were proven fact? They're filled with so many half-truths and outright lies that I get nauseous when I see one while flipping channels.

    27. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Or, just drag the taskbar to the bottom. Or just spend a minute customizing it so it behaves the way they're used to. It's faster than switching window managers.

    28. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      This has been my experience as well. I, like you, see no reason to not download the WGA updates.

      But then, my experience is limited to running a 50-computer Windows domain (only one Vista machine) for a small software company. I probably don't count.

    29. Re:PFFFFFT by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      my laptop, which dual boots with XP MCE, my HTPC which is running Vista Ultimate (both came from MSDN)

      Unless the licence has changed in the couple of years since I last read it, the OSes you get with an MSDN subscription are for testing purposes only - you're not supposed to use them for day to day use...

    30. Re:PFFFFFT by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      for most of the n00bs today, yeah.
      I've watched it go from Red Hat, to Slackware (very short time), to Arklinux, to Gentoo, then to Ubuntu.

      I'm sure some other distribution will come along and be the only os in existance soon.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    31. Re:PFFFFFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded funny? This is how you gain "market share". These are the type of things that get people to thinking "Maybe I should check out that other operating system thing Joe Smith told me about."

    32. Re:PFFFFFT by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      That does actually depend on the nature of your MSDN subscription... MSDN-AA (Academic Alliance), for example, allows you to use the software for everyday use, but requires you to stop using it 1 year after you finish university. The MSDN subscription I have is a Microsoft Partner agreement, which I get for free as part of the benefits package for working for a major OEM. It allows me to keep using the software as long as I still work for the company. The idea being I need to be familiar with the software in order to properly support and/or sell their product.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    33. Re:PFFFFFT by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....especially now that the hardware is effectively the same....

      Most computer failure, both Mac and PC, is due to software, not hardware. Consumer Reports disagrees with you and your friends. Apple's hardware, on average, is also of a higher quality than Dell or Gateway. In most things you get what you pay for. Sony, Lenovo and Toshiba hardware is equal to Apple in build quality and also costs more than a Dell or HP. Most PC failure is due to problems with Windows. Windows, with its registry and other legacy baggage is a kluge. Why do programs like registry cleaners and other software "tuneup" programs, as well as a plethora of anti-virus programs exists for Windows? Even supposedly more secure VISTA reminds me to install and keep anti-malware software updated.

      I have never yet seen a Windows system that doesn't get slower and more constipated with time, so as to eventually need a re-install laxative. This is even true of standalone systems that are not connected to the Internet where they might likely acquire some malware infection. That NEVER happens with OSX or Linux. OSX is based on a proven UNIX heritage, as is Linux.

      Linux on good hardware also makes for a very reliable computing experience for anyone willing and competent enough to search the net for drivers and other software. The main problem with Linux for consumers is, there is no central support, like there is for Apple systems or even Windows. How many /.ers, having recommended or even installed Linux for others, are now the support department for their non-geeky relatives and friends?

      Apple computers have to be and are more reliable simply because only Apple is in a position to design and test their hardware and software as an integrated whole. That approach, other things being equal, by definition will always result in a more reliable overall system. So yes, over all, the commercials are a fact. If they were not, Apple would have been sued long a go for false advertising. Is Apple perfect? NO. Any manufacturer of anything occasionally turns out a lemon.

      --
      All theory is gray
    34. Re:PFFFFFT by markdavis · · Score: 1

      True.

      Although it is not faster if the distro you choose uses KDE by default.

    35. Re:PFFFFFT by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      Not letting you use a product you didn't pay for is lack of respect?

      If you don't want to pay for a product for sale use something else but don't say the publisher should give you tea and cookie to go with your theft.

    36. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Also true; however if the distro you choose uses KDE by default then your original advice is unnecessary ;)

    37. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Most computer failure, both Mac and PC, is due to software, not hardware.

      I said that Macs aren't any more reliable than Windows or Linux machines, especially now that the hardware is effectively the same. Thanks for repeating my point, though.

      Yes, you get what you pay for. Usually. But I find it extremely difficult to believe that Apple uses so much higher quality hardware that it costs $600 more for an equivalently spec'ed machine. I've belabored the $600 more point a dozen times or more, and if you don't believe me I'll do it again.

      Most PC failure is due to problems with Windows.

      That's only because most PCs run Windows. If most PCs ran Linux, it would be just as valid to say "Most PC failure is due to problems with Linux"; if most PCs ran OSX, it would be just as valid to say "Most PC failure is due to problems with OSX." That's not really an insult to windows.

      Why do programs like registry cleaners and other software "tuneup" programs, as well as a plethora of anti-virus programs exists for Windows?

      You want the Apple answer or the real answer? Apple would have you believe Windows is inherently more insecure. While this may be true to some degree, the *real* answer is twofold: first, malware authors target Windows because it is so abundant (see above); second, the great majority of computer users (not just Windows users) are complete idiots with regard to taking care of their machine. Update Windows regularly, stay away from warez and porn sites, avoid downloading illegal software over p2p, and don't click links in spam e-mails, and you'll practically never have a virus or malware problem. It works for me.

      Anti-virus programs exist for Linux as well, and it won't be long before the big anti-virus vendors start selling anti-virus programs for OSX.

      I have never yet seen a Windows system that doesn't get slower and more constipated with time, so as to eventually need a re-install laxative.

      Then you've never seen a Windows system owned by someone who actually takes care of their operating system. The only reason I reinstalled windows this week was because SP3 screwed up my system - but before you gloat, keep in mind that Tiger and Leopard each in turn caused quite a few problems themselves. My system still ran quick as ever, though, despite the occasional SP3-induced crash ;) I didn't get BSODs, mind you, just some apps would occasionally crash (iTunes and Source-engine games, in particular).

      That NEVER happens with OSX or Linux. OSX is based on a proven UNIX heritage, as is Linux.

      It is not difficult to imagine loading OSX or Linux down with cruft to the point of unusability. Another straw-man argument.

      The main problem with Linux for consumers is, there is no central support, like there is for Apple systems or even Windows.

      Canonical supports Ubuntu, which is arguably the most common Linux distro that new users are familiar with.

      How many /.ers, having recommended or even installed Linux for others, are now the support department for their non-geeky relatives and friends?

      How many /.ers are currently the support department for their Windows-using relatives? For their Mac-using relatives? (I am, on both counts.) How many /.ers have recommended Ubuntu to their relatives so they could spend less time on support? That's not really a valid argument...

      So yes, over all, the commercials are a fact.

      I'll refer you to my blog post here regarding various half-truths and outright lies in Apple's commercials. Keep in mind that the post is just over a year old, so it does not deal with commercials newer

    38. Re:PFFFFFT by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      "Double click the blue bar at the top of the window" didn't work for him?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    39. Re:PFFFFFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the sad thing that Ubuntu n00bs don't know where the menus are or that the Ubuntu experienced users will run them off with RMS level ideological ranting?

    40. Re:PFFFFFT by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....malware authors target Windows because it is so abundant...

      False. Windows is an easier target. Macs are not impossible to infiltrate, neither is Linux, but both are harder than Widows. Added to that of course is that Windows is more common and that most malware writers are more familiar with all the holes.

      (..and it won't be long before the big anti-virus vendors start selling anti-virus programs for OSX..)

      They have already tried and most Mac users are not stupid enough to waste their money on such performance robbing crapware. Once there are not theoretical, but ten of thousands of real honest to goodness virulent nasties, circulating on the internet, that may change. When there are 10,000+ Macs assembled into a working, spam and malware spewing bot-net, these vendors will get some sales to Mac owners. Yawn, wake if and when that happens.

      (..Then you've never seen a Windows system owned by someone who actually takes care of their operating system..)

      Yes, if you are knowledgeable /.er you can keep a Windows system running reasonably OK. Any computer can break, but Macs need far less skilled babysitting than Windows. Linux, once set up properly by someone with geek skills also is more reliable for ordinary non-geek users.

      (..It is not difficult to imagine loading OSX or Linux down with cruft to the point of unusability..)

      Ye, some can and do imagine that. It is however only inmaginary. This is not necessary with Macs, because they "just work", out of the box. Apple doesn't load them up with all sorts of garbage "trial" ware. On the Mac, users don't have to first find and then run a special "un-installer" program to get rid of unwanted software. All files, including programs can be gotten rid of in the same, simple intuitive way -- just drag them into the trash.

      (..For their Mac-using relatives..)

      I too get calls from my Mac using relatives and friends. However these are seldom calls for a dead or malfunctioning computer, but for help on how to do things in certain software programs. It seems that not reading the manual is not a malady exclusive to the more computer literate /. readers.

      --
      All theory is gray
    41. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      False. Windows is an easier target.

      Ok, Dwight. If you say so - but the only proof you have of this is that most malware and viruses are written for Windows. In time, once virus creators actually spend time to find holes in OSX and Linux, there will be just as much malware for those OSes. Again, malware is most abundant for Windows simply because Windows is the most abundant OS. If Linux were most abundant, and Windows were simply some side curiousity, nobody would bother writing viruses for it no matter how insecure it is. (Incidentally, that's almost exactly the position OSX and Linux find themselves in right now.)

      Any computer can break, but Macs need far less skilled babysitting than Windows.

      Windows doesn't need babysitting, it needs users who aren't idiots. Once the Mac userbase encompasses the complete morons who use Windows now (you know, the ones falling for the Nigerian Bank Transfer spam schemes), we'll see who needs babysitting.

      Apple doesn't load them up with all sorts of garbage "trial" ware.

      You obviously didn't read the blog post I linked you to, because trialware was the first thing I talked about. Allow me to quote, so you don't have to scroll back up and click on the link:

      Stuffed: In this scene, PC is wearing a giant ball. He's stuffed with trialware. Mac proceeds to tell him that he doesn't know what that's like because he only has stuff people need - and then he spits out this list of stuff: "iTunes, iMovie, iPhoto, iWeb, it's all part of iLife."

      (Update: iWork, their MS Office equivalent, comes with the system but is just a 30-day trial. So that too is bloated trialware.)

      What if you don't want iTunes? iMovie? iPhoto? iWeb? Then that too would be considered "stuffing". The difference is that some vendors - not Windows itself - bundle trial versions of various programs. The only really annoying ones are the bad antivirus programs and the dialup internet providers.

      Take my Dell laptop, for example. It came with a Roxio CD Creator program. That's about it. There may have been a dialup offer, I don't recall - if there was, I deleted it. It wasn't hard. "Stuffed" is not a word I would use to describe my Dell when it arrived. I even opted out of the MS Office trial when I ordered the laptop - I use OpenOffice. Comparatively speaking, the Mac comes with lots of extra software - "Stuffed" certianly applies there (whether they're useful or not is a topic for later on).

    42. Re:PFFFFFT by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...Once the Mac userbase encompasses the complete morons who use Windows now ....

      Wow, are you REALLY saying that Mac users are smarter or more careful than Windows users? I have heard that before. Maybe there is something to that. After all, Macs are more expensive to buy. That means the Mac users likely have a higher income than Widows users for whom price is the overriding concern. Higher income is generally associated with higher education. Higher education is often considered to be the hallmark of greater smarts. So maybe, you're right. Maybe Mac users ARE smarter and more careful than the Windows people? I really don't want to think that, but perhaps it is not really such an unreasonable interference.

      (..In time, once virus creators actually spend time to find holes in OSX and Linux..)

      They're not likely to do that, because that means to do considerable work. If these miscreants were interested in work, they'd get real jobs, like us honest people. As long as there are a sufficient number of easy to infect Windows machines, (and stupider users?) these scums of humanity target those, rather than actually spend time to WORK.

      --
      All theory is gray
    43. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Considering that Apple has historically targeted relatively intelligent people with their marketing (image and video editors especially) and only now are they targeting a wider audience, yes, I would say that the current group of Mac users are more intelligent than the average Windows user.

      You may not like thinking that the average Windows user is a moron, but one thing I've learned from my relatively short time as my company's IT guy is this: People are stupid. And as the saying goes, if you make something idiot-proof, nature just makes a better idiot.

      They're not likely to do that, because that means to do considerable work.

      Are you implying that it's trivial to write and coordinate a botnet that is difficult to remove and difficult to spot? That it's easy to discover a new, obscure flaw and then write software that can effectively exploit it? I think you underestimate both the work required and the money they can earn doing it...

      Spammers, on the other hand, aren't targeting a particular platform (phishing scams, pump & dump, fake viagra sales, etc, are all internet-based and do not depend on Windows), so they don't count in the context of this discussion.

    44. Re:PFFFFFT by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....Are you implying that it's trivial to write and coordinate a botnet that is difficult to remove and difficult to spot....

      Even in Windows it may not be trivial to do, but evidently it is much harder on Macs and Linux. If that were not so, then someone would have already done so. The fact is that there are zero, zilch, nada such botnets in existence for Macs, even though there are millions of them out there. If it were so easy to do, someone, somewhere would have done it by now, if for no other reason than to be able to have the bragging rights for being the first one to hose thousands of supposedly secure Macs.

      --
      All theory is gray
    45. Re:PFFFFFT by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      My only point that saying "they write viruses to avoid work" is ridiculous.

      And, before you get all high-and-mighty about Mac security, there have been viruses for OSX, they're just few and far between at the moment.

  4. That's not too bad by faloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least there's not some odd hidden process that the users have no visibility to running in the background using resources.

    Oh wait...

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:That's not too bad by gerf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wish Ubuntu would do this, instead of having that ugly orange bird looking thing by default. Ugh. That's the first thing I change on any new system; all my backgrounds are plain black.

    2. Re:That's not too bad by sbeckstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to make a lame sort of funny reference to your lack of imagination, but I'm all out of ideas.

    3. Re:That's not too bad by gerf · · Score: 1

      Wow, your insight has educated me, and let me know how ignorant I was about the vast benefits of having images plastered in places where I want to look for something else!

      In light of your wisdom, next week I plan on posting a semi-transparent image across my car windshield, small versions on my glasses, and a few more on a couple rotating lampshades, so that images scroll across my living room at home, and cubicle at work.

    4. Re:That's not too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us running Process Explorer, yea, we don't have to worry about those nasty hidden processes or Alternate Data Streams.

    5. Re:That's not too bad by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      I was also going to give you a lame reply to this about your lack of imagination in the places you might want to put images, but you pretty much covered all the bases there too. Good job!

  5. that's it? by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm impressed with Microsoft's forbearance.

    1. Re:that's it? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised, too. They're much more aggressive with Vista, from what I've heard.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:that's it? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm impressed with Microsoft's forbearance.

      I find their lack of faith disturbing.

    3. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha - I'm voting you the best troll best of the year! Give that man (or woman) a +1 !

    4. Re:that's it? by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you talking about? For the average user, changing the wallpaper is one of the most important functions a computer can perform!

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    5. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well obviously they COULD do much worse but they'd still rather have someone use a warezed copy than consider another OS. Nagging them and making it impossible for them to use it in a (respectable) workplace is a good strategy. Also: WGA is not 100% reliable, close to it admittedly, but false positives can and do occur.

    6. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista doesnt even have WGA

    7. Re:that's it? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i hope that's meant to be sarcastic.

      i'm using a Dell my dad gave me as a gift when i went off to college, and it was supposed to come with a copy of XP (pre-installed). naturally, after a few years of use, i had to upgrade the computer/reformat the HDD/etc. during this process i found that Dell didn't actually give me a Windows XP setup disc. they had instead given me some Dell "system recovery" disc that would have re-installed all of their Dell-branded crap and bloatware from their software partners which i'd spent years removing and replacing.

      i found it much more convenient to just borrow a friend's XP disc. however, i realized to my dismay that the XP serial number which came with the Dell didn't actually work with anything except for the Dell OS Recovery disc. and i wasn't going to use that disc (by now i'd lost it anyway) and have to spend a week uninstall everything and manually re-install all the new service packs and updates. so i just ended up using a "pirated" XP setup disc image i found on the web which included all the latest service packs and updates (minus WGA) and no other useless crap.

      unfortunately, i accidentally installed the WGA update one day. and so every time the system starts, and seemingly every 15 minutes after that, i get told that my copy of windows isn't "genuine" which causes whatever program was in the foreground to lose-focus and is particularly annoying when you're typing.

    8. Re:that's it? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      i belive there is a simple registry key to change and that it. Alternatively set your clock back a year seamed to work for the betas, or you could use your web access to send firefox to explorer.exe and then get a full windows session anyway.
      well thats what ive heard anyway i trashed my vista install when making space for ubuntu and cba to reinstall

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    9. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The operating system itself deters enough pirates on its own.

    10. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use HijackThis to remove the wga* files

    11. Re:that's it? by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      They must have recently cast Blessing of Protection to get away from an anti-trust lawsuit.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    12. Re:that's it? by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Just look around on the torrent sites. You can find install disks that install without you having to enter a serial number (automatic) and pass wga. They will also have the most recent service packs, ie 7 updates, and media player (whatever the latest is).

      Even if you are the ethical type that pays for software you should be cool with this as you have already paid for it.

      If you don't need windows specific software, you could try ubuntu linux. Or better yet, if the laptop uses intel graphics, drive controller, etc you could give FreeBSD a whirl (personal favorite).

    13. Re:that's it? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      well, that's basically what i did. and the system worked fine for several months. but windows update kept prompting me to install WGA. i just ignored the system tray update messages for several weeks, but some way or another it got installed (i probably accidentally installed it along with a new security update).

      since i'd just gotten settled into my new install i wasn't looking forward to having to reformat and starting all over again, so i've just been putting up with it. but i'll probably follow the tips that have been posted and try to remove WGA or do a fresh install from one of those disks you referred to.

      and unfortunate i do graphic design, so i use programs like Photoshop, Illustrator, QuarkXpress, etc. on a daily basis, and I also need to make sure that the client's site renders properly in IE (which is arguably the most frustrating part of my job). but i probably should give Ubuntu a try as a secondary OS.

    14. Re:that's it? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dell actually uses a different key on their recovery discs than the one that's on the side of the computer.

      If you open d:\I386\winnt.sif The key is listed in there somewhere. That key also works, and I believe that in the past when I rolled my own discs, that was the one I'd use. IIRC I took the disc from my brother's computer and enter Dell's registration key. That generally worked just fine.

      But that was years ago, and I don't really deal with Windows much these days.

    15. Re:that's it? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Look for the WGA crack. run it (DONT RUN the keygen outside a VM) follw the instructions and kiss WGA goodbye. It modifies it so that all versions of WGA will see your computer as genuine. It makes a hash that fits the key (Needs to be a Volume License key) and from then on all Microsoft attempts to discover your pirated version fail.

      Until they set up a license validation server, and that will never happen. They don't even have that for Vista, but then nobody pirates vista.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:that's it? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      This worked a treat for me:

      http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page

      I used it to play along with a school website which absolutely refused to work on anything but IE.

      Note, it's a very detailed install script, and not entirely trivial to get it to play well with another wine install. But for almost one-click install of a near-perfect IE6 (or 5.5, or 5) under linux, it is awesome.

      It doesn't solve your Adobe dependencies, but just thought I'd spread the word.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    17. Re:that's it? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      You can clear the CD key you are using and set it to

    18. Re:that's it? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Bah. I didn't check the preview. Here's the link:
      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328874

    19. Re:that's it? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      My experience is that the computers are all set up with some kind of installation key by Dell, likely because they clone the drives so a lot of Dells may have the same key. Windows may install with that key, but it won't (usually) activate. The key on the sticker is like an OEM key which is tied to a specific computer, only it hasn't been used yet so it isn't tied to a specific computer. If you use that key with the recovery CD like you're supposed to, then it will tie that key to your Dell. But if you use that key on another computer, then that key becomes tied with that computer, and you'll have two copies of Windows XP that are fine with WGA so long as nothing happens to the Dell that would require a reinstall. The tricky part though can be finding a copy of XP that will accept the key on the sticker.

      Of course, if all you want is a copy of XP without paying for it, there are easier ways to do it.

    20. Re:that's it? by PCMeister · · Score: 1

      On the contrary my fellow /.'er...

      Changing the wallpaper is but one of the most important functions a computer can perform!! Right up there is a user waiting to have their screen saver activate and asking people in surrounding cubicles to run over... just to see the little fishies swim around, or flying toasters/toilets if you're still running Win 3.1x with After Dark(tm). To each their own I say!

    21. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're new to this great printer thing, huh?

    22. Re:that's it? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm surprised they don't HAL_PORTER IS A CHEAPSKATE WHO STOLE WINDOWS do something more drastic.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    23. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer Wallpaper? is it like the bathroom wallpaper??

    24. Re:that's it? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Gates: Patience, my friend. In time, WGA will seek *you* out, and when it does, you must bring it before me. It has grown strong. Only together can we turn WGA to the Dark Side of the Desktop.

      Balmer: As you wish.

      Gates: Everything is proceeding as I have forseen.

    25. Re:that's it? by eknagy · · Score: 1

      My screensaver is a pure black 1024*768 png, you insensitive clod!

    26. Re:that's it? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      and unfortunate i do graphic design, so i use programs like Photoshop, Illustrator, QuarkXpress, etc. on a daily basis, and I also need to make sure that the client's site renders properly in IE (which is arguably the most frustrating part of my job). but i probably should give Ubuntu a try as a secondary OS.

      Write to Abode and let them know that you are interested in using their products on Linux. If we don't speak up and let them know what we want, how can we expect them to code it?

      http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/contact.html

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    27. Re:that's it? by bentcd · · Score: 1

      For the average user, changing the wallpaper is one of the most important functions a computer can perform!

      Countdown until someone writes a resident app that will automatically reset the wallpaper to what the user actually wants it to be:
      ... zero.

      This isn't going to prompt people to un-pirate their Windows installation, it's going to prompt them to download software that will fix their OS. Before long this will be an ubiquitous feature in third-party screen savers etc.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    28. Re:that's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But for almost one-click install of a near-perfect IE6 (or 5.5, or 5) under linux, it is awesome.

      Also IE7 support is now in beta.

    29. Re:that's it? by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      Did you try contacting Dell to get another copy of the cd?
      I don't know what their policy is. Just curious.

  6. Help Vista or Linux? by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Some sites have also suggested that this is a sneaky scheme to get more people to buy Windows Vista after disappointing sales of the new OS"

    It's going to be very funny if this does more for Linux than Vista.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Smoky+D.+Bear · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I'll never have this problem with Ubuntu!

    2. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by compro01 · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But that's not how it works. MS makes the "free" 'pirated' windows they got (probably from a shady computer shop bundling it with their cut-price PC, the people affected by this will mostly be the "unknowing" 'pirates') suck, so they assume that the free ubuntu must suck and/or be illegal too. I've already encountered people who think free linux is criminal because they're so brainwashed by the infofascist BSA crowd. It felt like that electrolytes scene from idiocracy when I tried to explain it - possibly my fault for not being clear enough, but they were so godawfully dumb I couldn't stand it anymore and pointed out they could buy a copy of linux from a company if they wanted, which felt like the "eventually he told them he could talk to plants" thing.

    4. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by sbeckstead · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm confused, Microsoft claims great sales of Vista. which is it? We have a bus service where I live that's has a big Vista on the side of the bus, kind of reminds me of the Microsoft product, large lumbering and hardly used because it doesn't go anywhere useful.

    5. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now you have to install Linux Genuine Advantage and pay your $699 licensing fee, you cock-smoking teabaggers!

    6. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by luwain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem with these schemes by Microsoft is that they more often than not inconvenience legitimate owners of valid licenses. I've had more than a few cases of valid installations of Windows "deactivate". It's doubtful that WGA is "bulletproof" and won't flag some legitimate licenses as invalid and screw-up a loyal Windows users' system. Also, for those who really pirate Windows (are there that many pirates out there??), hacking around WGA is child's play. I think that this will turn more people off than stop pirates. I've been using Ubuntu 8.0.4, and I'm very pleased. I have no problem exchanging documents with Windows users, and since I'm doing development in Java, there's no incompatibility there either, since even the Windows guys are using NetBEans and Eclipse...Is there really much pirating going around that Microsoft has to waste programming resources to combat it? From what I see, people want to BUY XP. Microsoft could probably stop XP from being stolen altogether, if they just continued making it easy for OEMs to offer it, and continued support.

    7. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Kneo24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it probably won't do more for Linux than Vista, but it will probably do something positive for Linux in some capacity. What that is, no one really knows.

    8. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a $999 licensing fee. Or just $99 for a single system.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      I recently bought a laptop from Dell for my upcoming deployment. In order to remain totally open to anyone else in my unit, I decided to go with Windows XP(since there most likely won't be any resources to do any kind of messing around to get Linux to work with any Windows program). Unfortunately, Dell only has Windows XP for their top-end laptops, of which I didn't want to spend that much money on. The default for everything else is Windows Vista. While I did end up buying one, I have to now use an old copy of XP, call up Microsoft, make up an explanation, etc etc etc. And I was actually wanting to use a legitimate copy. I even offered to pay extra. No dice.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    10. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3610011/Linux_Genuine_Advantage_Crack

      Here's the crack

    11. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have it if you want.

      LMAO thats great!

    12. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by DJ+Manning · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But don't forget to install the crack, like every good pirate should. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3610011/Linux_Genuine_Advantage_Crack

    13. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by armanox · · Score: 1

      Miss the whole SCO debacle, did you?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    14. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      No, I got it, but the LGA guys quote a $999 site-license fee or a $99 single-machine fee.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    15. Re:Help Vista or Linux? by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      But that's not how it works. MS makes the "free" 'pirated' windows they got (probably from a shady computer shop bundling it with their cut-price PC, the people affected by this will mostly be the "unknowing" 'pirates') suck, so they assume that the free ubuntu must suck and/or be illegal too. I've already encountered people who think free linux is criminal because they're so brainwashed by the infofascist BSA crowd. It felt like that electrolytes scene from idiocracy when I tried to explain it - possibly my fault for not being clear enough, but they were so godawfully dumb I couldn't stand it anymore and pointed out they could buy a copy of linux from a company if they wanted, which felt like the "eventually he told them he could talk to plants" thing.

      It's amazing to think that people like that exist, but I know they do. People who not necessarily respect copyrights, but think anything that is intentionally free is going to automatically 'suck'.

  7. Vista Black Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there a news item about Vista doing this as well?

  8. A new meaning to BSOD... by jt2377 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Black Screen of Death

    1. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by lastomega7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, death isn't what they are going for. Maybe it should be something like BDOA: Black Desktop of Annoyance.

    2. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      A black desktop reduces power consumption of CRTs, so Microsoft deserve credit for their environmental thinking and consideration for the power bills of those who can't afford LCD monitors or legitimate Windows licenses.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to propose BDSM: Black Desktop Shame Monitor

    4. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      So this is MSochism, step one. Step two is writing a kinky boot sector to your C: drive.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    5. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      black screen of doldrums, more like it.

      Still it's a small price to pay for using the product without paying for it. I'm waiting to hear that Microsoft has started formatting hard drives and deleting user's data for not having a WGA approved OS.

    6. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      But doesn't a black desktop increase the power usage of LCDs? [citation needed, I know.] So, with the increasing prevalence of LCD monitors, Microsoft might actually be increasing total power usage...

      I would appreciate it if someone would correct me if I'm wrong.

    7. Re:A new meaning to BSOD... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      The power to drive the LCD cells is negligable compared to the backlight, and both combined are less by the variation in power consumption of some larger CRTs, so based on usage figures from BOSPOOMA* there's a net reduction.

      Besides, I'm sure Microsoft wants us to pay for their OS before we consider buying a fancy new monitor (though I don't mind disappointing them).

      *Bureau of Statistics Pulled Out of My Ass, the most widely cited source of information on the web.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  9. Yawn.... by scarboni888 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can someone remind me why Microsoft wants to chase people off to other platforms again?

    1. Re:Yawn.... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can someone remind me why Microsoft wants to chase people off to other platforms again?

      They're increasing their users' pain thresholds so that they'll find Vista's annoyances tolerable.

    2. Re:Yawn.... by click2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because they're hoping one or two might actually end up buying Vista.

      The Vista Drake Equation

          N = R x fp x ne x fi x fe x L

      where

          N is the number of Vista sales
          R is the number of reported WGA unlicensed XP install hits.
          fp if the fraction of those that care about a black screen & bit of text
          ne is the number of users with PCs that can actually run Vista
          fi is the fraction of XP users who dont have the brains to use Ubuntu
          fe is the fraction of XP users who dont use a tool to kill the WGA app
          L is the fraction of XP users too lazy to get Windows Update to skip the WGA app

      S - Number of sales
      X - Number of illegal XP copies

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    3. Re:Yawn.... by markdavis · · Score: 1

      fi is the fraction of XP users who dont have the brains to use Ubuntu^H^H^H^H^H^H Linux

      There, fixed it for you.

    4. Re:Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make their linux investments pay off of course!

    5. Re:Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's S in your equation :P ?

    6. Re:Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere. There are no Vista sales.

    7. Re:Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone is using a pirate copy of Windows, then there is a low chance of them changing platform. Lets see their options:

      Mac - Not a chance. If someone is too cheap to buy a windows license, then they aren't gonna pay for a new Mac computer.
      Linux - Converting to Linux is a huge pain in the neck, despite what the /. crowd might say. If someone was going to use Linux, then they would do so out of free will, not because they were forced by WGA.
      Windows - Likely choice, because it's the easy choice. All of their software* will "just work", and they are familar with the platform. They'll probably struggle on until a new patch/crack is available, otherwise they'll pay for the license.

      *May include illegally downloaded software ;)

    8. Re:Yawn.... by Vengie · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the amount of bullshit you're willing to buy from Frank Drake^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h Microsoft. http://xkcd.com/384/

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  10. Great. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most people I know who run 'stolen' software don't have the funds, are not otherwise law-breakers, and are not aware of alternatives. I've had great luck giving these people an OpenCD and explaining the law, and, in the case of small businesses, the BSA's tactics.

    I wonder how long it will be before somebody comes along with a registry edit file that will replace the permanent watermark text with a link to Ubuntu?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by topham · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just another reason to pirate it since I've triggered the damn tool multiple times on Legitimately licensed product.

    1. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Howitzer86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The funny thing is, you're a fool if you update WGA. Just set it to automatic notification instead of automatic download, then you can pick and choose which update you want. You can even tell it never to update that program again.

    2. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe it's just me, but I usually set my desktop to black anyway as one of the first steps after an install. This sounds to me like a feature rather than a deterrent.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny thing is, you're a fool if you update WGA.

      What the hell? No you aren't. Microsoft makes you download it every time you get something off their site that isn't a critical update. So, to have WGA, all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, because I've personally installed and successfully activated the same OEM copy of Windows XP on at least four different computers. Not one of them has ever had any authentication trouble.

    5. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they learn anymore?

      All the inconvenience tactics software companies introduce into their products in an attempt to stop piracy end up actually encouraging it instead.

      People like me quickly bypass the lockouts and checks and get on with using the software hassle free (Its so stupid, I even crack the software I've actually paid for, just for ease of use.) and meanwhile the poor honest paying customers get stuck with crap like WGA, StarForce, and DRM ridden media.

      You introduce one of those honest customers to someone like me, and explain that all those checks, activations, and limitations can be done away with for but a few minutes effort and you get instant converts.

    6. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by hellwig · · Score: 1

      Who has a full-resolution version of a screen shot? I feel like setting a new background image for my desktop and TFA only has a reduced-resolution image.

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
    7. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by GiMP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      Some might beg to differ.

    8. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      ...all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      I disagree.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    9. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      What the hell? No you aren't. Microsoft makes you download it every time you get something off their site that isn't a critical update. So, to have WGA, all you need to do is want some software they make. That's not foolish in the least.

      It isn't?
      I have often needed to install some software they make, but I've never actually wanted to -- mostly because of stunts like this. When they can retroactively change the rules on how your software runs, how can you want to install their software?

    10. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it isn't? Read what you said carefully... ;)

    11. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by DJ+Manning · · Score: 1

      As he said, you're a fool if you want any Microsoft product installed on your computer.

    12. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      how can you want to install their software?

      Very simply. It does something that I want. That's all the reason I need to want to install any software, and it trumps all other arguments.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    13. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Also that annoying Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool it wants to install along with WGA just to do updates or install Microsoft software that has to pass a genuine check before it will install.

      The MSRT never seems to detect anything at all, I suspect it is really malware that reports on what the User is doing back to Microsoft and the names of the software they have installed and if they are legit or not. I've never actually seen MSRT detect and remove anything even when other malware removers claim there are hundreds if not thousands of malware infections.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    14. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about changing my parents' pirated (but not detected as such) XP key to a known bad one. And then update WGA...

      How fast should I be able to get them off Windows?

    15. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for having a blank, black wallpaper anyway.

    16. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, now i'll have to have it all black instead of all blue?

      Oh... Microsoft... this is evil!

    17. Re:Wonderful; just another reason to pirate it by joleran · · Score: 1

      This is only true when you attempt to directly download from their site. Set automatic updates on and to "download, but notify me before installation". Bypasses the whole WGA system.

  12. *Innocent Whistling* by loteck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cough, Cough.

    *Continues innocent whistling*

    1. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a machine on which I installed XP Home Edition from original media, but I couldn't find the jewel case, so I had no idea what the serial number was.. Turns out you can just google for keys. One of them will work, and Microsoft never checks again.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 1

      If by "google for keys" you mean, google and steal other peoples keys, then yes.

    3. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I've heard that some people steal the serials off cars parked in public too.

      Bastards.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 1

      It's okay to steal an unlocked car right? Cause they left it unlocked?

    5. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You're not actually going to make me spell this out for you are ya?

      It's not stealing because no-one is being deprived of anything.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 0

      Only if you think the time spent developing software is worth nothing.

    7. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Huh? Did you read my post? I bought XP Home Edition.. I just can't find the jewel case and Microsoft is too cheap to print the serial on the CD.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes I read your post, and boo hoo for you, but the vast majority of people who pirate windows don't do it because they can't find their cd key. I was only made the last reply based on the overwhelming frequency with which everyone that pirates software uses that same argument. "Oh I'm just making a copy, I'm not stealing anything." The people that work at Microsoft don't write software because they enjoy socialist software ideals, they do it to make money.

    9. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh Huh. The people who sing on the street corner do it to make money too. That doesn't mean I'm required to pay them for hearing their song.

      The lack of consent in copyright-based transactions is what is so morally repugnant and why so many people refuse to be bullied into paying. You want to be paid for your services? Don't relinquish your control over them.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 1

      So if I write a book, and 1 person buys a copy and proceeds to photocopy it and give it away for free, it's my fault for selling it to him? As for people who sing on a street corner, that could be much better equated with "for donations" software, and them not getting paid by everyone who listens is a result of a public performance. I'm sure if you snuck into a concert "for pay", they band would be much less understanding then the guy on the street corner.

    11. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has stolen that time, so its value is irrelevant.

    12. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yes. You failed to control your product. Too bad for you.

      I like your concert analogy, although it's more like hitting up people in the car park for money because they can hear the band play. Or hitting up a fan's friends for money because they listen to the recording the fan made at the concert.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. You failed to control your product. Too bad for you.

      That's all I need to know about you to end this conversation.

    14. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      It means your business model is inherently flawed and you must rely on arbitrary laws and regulations to keep it propped up. Or, fix it.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    15. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      That demonstrates that Microsoft's constant efforts to stop piracy are as much security theater as the airport security checkpoints are. This hassles/scares the false positive (botched WGA?) and does nothing, in the end, to stop the determined pirate.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    16. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I write a book, and 1 person buys a copy and proceeds to photocopy it and give it away for free, it's my fault for selling it to him?

      Yes. If you want control over a particular object, then you can have that control. It's called ownership. You give it up when you sell the item. That's what selling means - the transfer of ownership, and thus, control.

      You want to have your cake and eat it too. You want the money from the sale, but you don't want to give up ownership or control. Perhaps you should consider leasing your property out instead of selling it, it seems more in line with what you actually want.

    17. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirates are also the enemy of Free Software since they won't hesitate to break the terms of the GPL either.

    18. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by kuzb · · Score: 1

      You want to have your cake and eat it too. You want the money from the sale, but you don't want to give up ownership or control. Perhaps you should consider leasing your property out instead of selling it, it seems more in line with what you actually want.

      Which is exactly what MS is doing. They're licensing it to you. They're not giving it to you with no strings. Piracy is illegal. Trying to quantify piracy as "nobody gets hurt" is wrong. Saying the model is flawed is an easy way out, because it's hard to replace the model with anything that adequately compensates the company.

      Perhaps it doesn't hurt MS quite as bad as it does other people, but there are plenty of people who try to make a living writing and selling software who get put out of business by it, and don't have the resources to combat the problem. By your logic, these people should just bend over and like it. After all, they couldn't control their product.

      Perhaps you don't make money by writing software, but other people do. While it's hard to feel sorry for a company like MS, it's really easy when it's a small team who come up with a good idea and get screwed by the vast majority of people who refuse to compensate them for their work.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    19. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome to capitalism...real capitalism, not the fake state protected kind IP fanbois love to pass off as the real thing.

    20. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly what MS is doing. They're licensing it to you.

      No, they aren't. When you walk into a shop, pick up a box, bring it to the counter, and pay for it, does it say "Windows" on the box, or does it say "A License for Windows" on the box? When they put adverts in magazines, do they tell you to buy Windows, or do they tell you to buy a license for Windows?

      You are buying a copy of Windows. Not a license. You don't need a license to use software in the USA. You don't need a license to copy software for the purpose of installing, using or backing up in the USA. The idea that you aren't really buying a copy of Windows is a myth.

      Saying the model is flawed is an easy way out

      Especially when that's the point I'm trying to make. That's not "an easy way out", it's exactly my point.

      it's hard to replace the model with anything that adequately compensates the company.

      It's not hard. It's just harder than having the government serve you up a monopoly on a plate. Anything is harder in comparison to that.

      there are plenty of people who try to make a living writing and selling software who get put out of business by it

      I make a living writing and selling software, and it doesn't make the slightest bit of different to me if copyright exists or not. Specifically, I work on web applications. The code I write is tailored to the businesses that hire me.

      Here's the thing: most people who write software are like me. The commercial software might be the most visible to you, the end user, but it's a minority in the software industry. So please, going on about "the poor developers" isn't very convincing.

      By your logic, these people should just bend over and like it. After all, they couldn't control their product.

      No, by my logic, these people should just bend over and like it because their business model is based around getting paid for giving up control of their product and then attempting to control it anyway.

    21. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im going to download the WGA patch for my slackware box right now!

    22. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by kuzb · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't. When you walk into a shop, pick up a box, bring it to the counter, and pay for it, does it say "Windows" on the box, or does it say "A License for Windows" on the box? When they put adverts in magazines, do they tell you to buy Windows, or do they tell you to buy a license for Windows? You are buying a copy of Windows. Not a license. You don't need a license to use software in the USA. You don't need a license to copy software for the purpose of installing, using or backing up in the USA. The idea that you aren't really buying a copy of Windows is a myth.

      You are wrong, I'm sorry. Read the EULA (End User License Agreement) that comes with nearly any piece of software. They are granting you license. They are not giving you sole ownership of the software. The fact that you get a box, and a CD is a convenience to the end user. After all, in order to use the license, you have to be able to access the software. Microsoft is hardly the only company to do this.

      I make a living writing and selling software, and it doesn't make the slightest bit of different to me if copyright exists or not. Specifically, I work on web applications. The code I write is tailored to the businesses that hire me.

      Here is the crux of the problem in your argument. You write web applications tailored to specific entities. What you do is very different than what desktop software developers do. Your industry and theirs are like comparing apples and oranges. Of course nobody is going to pirate that, because it's tailored to an individual. Desktop software on the other hand is trying to appeal to the masses.

      Here's the thing: most people who write software are like me. The commercial software might be the most visible to you, the end user, but it's a minority in the software industry. So please, going on about "the poor developers" isn't very convincing.

      You're right. Most developers are like you. Web development has the lowest barrier for entry for any of the programming fields. I know so many people without any education in the web development field that it's scary. You might not be one of these people, but it's why there are so many web developers. Piracy does hurt small and independent desktop developers. Don't kid yourself.

      No, by my logic, these people should just bend over and like it because their business model is based around getting paid for giving up control of their product and then attempting to control it anyway.

      This is bunk. I don't know of any other way to describe it. Any model for selling your product is giving up control, unless you start going the road of intrusive anti-copy protection schemes which keep the less tech-savvy honest. Or you annoy your users in to buying the product. Developers shouldn't have to do this. But they are doing it as a byproduct of mentalities like yours.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    23. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong, I'm sorry. Read the EULA

      The EULA is just a piece of paper that is bundled in the same box you buy your copy of Windows in. If I stick a piece of paper in a car saying that you aren't allowed to drive it over a certain speed, and then sell you the car, does that make it legal? If it looks like a sale, swims like a sale and quacks like a sale, then it's a sale. You pay your money, you own what's in the box.

      How about, instead of reading Microsoft's wishful thinking, you read the law?

      it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided... that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine

      You simply do not need a license to use software.

      What you do is very different than what desktop software developers do.

      No. Completely wrong. What I do is very different to what commercial software developers do. There are plenty of desktop software developers that do precisely what I do. In fact, they are the majority. Look in any large company, you'll find people writing non-web software that will never be sold. It's not as visible for obvious reasons, but it's there. The platform is irrelevant, and I think you know that, you just wanted an excuse to lead into...

      I know so many people without any education in the web development field that it's scary. You might not be one of these people

      But you're happy to imply it anyway!

      Yes, the state of the web development industry is atrocious. That has no bearing on the argument at hand and your ad hominems have no place here.

      Any model for selling your product is giving up control

      You've missed my point entirely. The problem is not giving up control. The problem is basing a business model around simultaneously giving up control (selling) and not giving up control (copyright). The two together are a contradiction. One side must give way. Either you really sell your software, in which case you have no right to control it once it has left your possession, or you lease your software, in which case it remains yours and you can still control it. You can't have it both ways.

    24. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except he was not "bootlegging", "stealing" or any number of ways you want to put it. He paid for a CD and wanted to use his legally purchased copy for its intended purpose, installing his legally purchased software on his computer. Unless you want to imply that he did not actually purchase the CD, but it is merely loaned (indefinitely) so that he can use his serial number and it is the serial number that is purchased...

    25. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by kuzb · · Score: 1

      How about, instead of reading Microsoft's wishful thinking, you read the law

      wow .. just ... wow.

      (a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. -- Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided: (1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine and that it is used in no other manner, or (2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.

      section 106 reads:

      106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted works38 Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

      Oh, and more interestingly:

      (b) Lease, Sale, or Other Transfer of Additional Copy or Adaptation. -- Any exact copies prepared in accordance with the provisions of this section may be leased, sold, or otherwise transferred, along with the copy from which such copies were prepared, only as part of the lease, sale, or other transfer of all rights in the program. Adaptations so prepared may be transferred only with the authorization of the copyright owner.

      You know the meaning of the word 'exclusive', right? This means not only is it illegal to make a copy and give it away (unless you have to give up your rights to use it by doing so), it's doubly illegal to in any way modify the program and make copies of it for distribution without permission. So anyone distributing a cracked copy of a program, or a crack which uses elements of the original program is subject to this.

      I'll be the first to admit that IANAL, and maybe I'm way off in my analysis here. However it would seem that you aren't either. From where I'm sitting, you're not only wrong, you're really wrong.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    26. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by romcabrera · · Score: 1

      YHBT HAND

    27. Re:*Innocent Whistling* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you do know what "notwithstanding" means, right? "In spite of"? In other words, it says "Even though that bit over there says that you can't do it, we're saying right here that in these circumstances, it's okay". It seems you've completely misunderstood it as meaning the opposite. Think about it, that doesn't make any sense the way you have it. Why make an exception while pointing to another section that overrules the exception?

  13. Again? by Mortiss · · Score: 1

    Havent MS tried to push something like that before already (via WGA)? - just changing the annoyance that comes when pirated Windows is detected?

  14. They're kidding, right? by stinerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first thing I do after installing XP is turn the wallpaper to black.

    Apparently, pirating it saves me a step after install.

    WTG, MSFT!

    1. Re:They're kidding, right? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      All kidding aside, a pirated copy of Windows is often easier to install or at least easier to get along with.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:They're kidding, right? by LodCrappo · · Score: 1

      I do exactly the same thing. I think maybe back in the days of CRTs I thought it would help save the screen (maybe it did?), and I just got used to it.

      Every so often someone stops at my desk to ask what's wrong with my computer. They usually ask something along the lines of "What happened to your screensaver?", confused about even the name of the desktop background.

      --
      -Lod
    3. Re:They're kidding, right? by Warll · · Score: 1

      Every so often someone stops at my desk to ask what's wrong with my computer. They usually ask something along the lines of "What happened to your screensaver?", confused about even the name of the desktop background.

      Sometimes when my laptop fails to properly resume after I bring it back from the screensaver it has a black wallpaper. So it possible that they have ran into this same problem before.

    4. Re:They're kidding, right? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Same here... I thought this was a feature when I first read it.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:They're kidding, right? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      While I often to this myself, most non-technical users set background images. My sister puts goofy home-made (as in Paint) pictures on her background, my brother puts pictures of Lego models, my dad uses a generic Dell-branded blue background, my mom uses a picture from the most recent family vacation, and so forth. I sometimes switch to wallpapers for upcoming games I'm excited about (such as right now, for Diablo III), and for several years I had it set to ZMatrix...

      While conceptually this form of nag wouldn't bother me, I can easily understand how it would annoy a normal, non-technical user.

    6. Re:They're kidding, right? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      They usually ask something along the lines of "What happened to your screensaver?", confused about even the name of the desktop background.

      AAAAA!!!! One of my personal pet peeves. And it's getting worse - to the point that device makers are starting to feed the ignorance.

      My cell phone actually refers to the background picture as the "Screen Saver". When I saw that, I knew it was one more confirmation that the rest of the world is getting dumber.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    7. Re:They're kidding, right? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's a memory issue with active desktop failing to allocate properly? I've had pictures in web browsers just disappear because I was running on the ragged edge of my pitiful RAM... they became white, not black, but that's just because the page was white behind them.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:They're kidding, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliant!

  15. Hmm... by Chris+Acheson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows is shareware now?

    1. Re:Hmm... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Shareware? No ... scareware, maybe.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Hmm... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      P L E A S E R E G I S T E R

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Hmm... by raaisma · · Score: 1

      no, it's nagware.

  16. CHAOS? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    So if the Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) tool somehow decides that a real copy is pirated, is my windows new thingabobbers then gonna be as pesky as that mosquito that I can't seem to find and kill, but which I can hear all through the night?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
  17. Good thing by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I always chose to not install WGA. Sure I check the box that says "do not ask me again" but every once in a while it still does. What requires WGA anyhow?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always chose to not install WGA. Sure I check the box that says "do not ask me again" but every once in a while it still does. What requires WGA anyhow?

      Why do they let people get away with not installing it anyway? I'd have thought it would have been pushed out as a mandatory cannot be ignored update by now.

    2. Re:Good thing by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      What requires WGA anyhow?

      * Microsoft Marketing
      * Microsoft Sales
      * Microsoft Legal
      * Bill Gates' wallet
      * Steve Ballmer's wallet

      I'm sure there are more that you can think of.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Good thing by no-body · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that you cannot download any "upgrades/fixes" unless you download WGA - at least that happens in some (non-US) distributions. In US distributions, you apparently have a choice to avoid installing WGA and keep updating.

    4. Re:Good thing by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      The windows update site requires WGA but windows still downloads updates in the background. Once in a while WGA gets thrown in at the bottom so keep an eye out!

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    5. Re:Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Updates.

    6. Re:Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMP is a good one. And Netflix (and possibly other sites, I don't know) requires you to download WMP 11 to watch their movies instantly. Thankfully, a quick jaunt through Google will tell you how to install it without the WGA step.

  18. Another push to get peopel using Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My prediction: M$ are squeezing the illegal XP market, trying to get them to use illegal Vista instead.

    This is merely the first step, they'll eventually add checks for the most common cracks, followed by kill switches.

  19. I bet that.... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It will still flag perfectly legal copies of Windows as being pirated. Just like it has in the past.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:I bet that.... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bet it will continue to flag random people at a slowly accelerating rate, thereby pushing more and more people to Vista. That's probably what they think it will push people to, but hey - let's not disillusion them!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:I bet that.... by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      It does when the user has a firewall that is not the Windows Firewall and blocks the WGA request to check the key. Then Windows becomes Grayware and Microsoft cannot verify if it is legit or not. Then later the Grayware becomes pirated even if there is a valid key from the computer sticker that was sold with the system.

      So you either use the crappy Windows Firewall and get tons of viri infections or buy something better and get a false positive from Microsoft on the WGA check.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:I bet that.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I've never had this problem. What firewall are you using?

    4. Re:I bet that.... by seizurebattlerobot · · Score: 0

      What's really scary about this whole thing is that Microsoft is getting more and more comfortable with forcibly and surreptitiously installing updates on to machines.

      As the process gets more streamlined internally, the company will be obligated to install rootkits and trojans for the government when handed a court order. It wouldn't surprise me if this was already happening for various FBI investigations.

      In fact, this is one of the main reasons I do not use Windows. Every copy of Windows has a back door that Microsoft can use to compromise the machine at its whim. Depending upon which countries the Windows Update servers are located, various government agencies from around the world can coerce Microsoft into using these back doors for whatever they want to.

      How long before this back door is used to out dissidents in China or spy on the American ruling party's political opponents?

  20. Fantastic by RollinDutchMasters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given that there are a number of pieces of malware which break WGA and cause it to fail to validate (most of which are not trivial to clean out), why exactly would Microsoft have WGA punish them even more? I'd have to imagine that people with actual pirated copies of windows will just continue to not visit windowsupdate and continue to not have the WGA. I don't see this having a major effect on anyone except legitimate users.

    1. Re:Fantastic by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      why exactly would Microsoft have WGA punish them even more?

      Because Microsoft doesn't care about home users, in the service sense. They already got your money when you bought the computer, and they're going to get more when you buy your next computer. If you don't have a support contract they have absolutely no reason to please you, because most users will be coming back for more no matter what.

  21. My stance on WGA and Vista by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If we assume that one of the purposes of paying for Windows were to provide the user^H^H^H^Hcustomer with a "better Windows Experience" by means of fixing bugs and improving the Operating System in the next version, and due to the fact that Vista Sucks, I say we got ripped off and piracy is our legitimate right.

    And don't get me started into viruses.

    1. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that Vista Sucks

      Stop drinking the Slashdot koolaid. Vista only sucks if you try to run it on ancient underpowered hardware, just like XP sucked when you tried to run it on your daddy's Pentium-II and Win95 sucked when you tried to run it on your grandpappy's 386.

    2. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 0

      If we assume that one of the purposes of paying for Windows were to provide the user^H^H^H^Hcustomer with a "better Windows Experience" by means of fixing bugs and improving the Operating System in the next version

      So far so good...

      and due to the fact that Vista Sucks

      OH, and he whiffs! Falling for the old Vista Sucks meme! He really needs to learn that Vista doesn't actually suck, Bob.

      I say we got ripped off and piracy is our legitimate right.

      And ANOTHER miss! Wow, Bob, this guy really is having an off-night tonight. Hopefully after the game, his coach will inform him that the proper recourse for a company not making a product you like is to avoid purchasing it, not stealing their other products!

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who you callin granpappy ya little whipper snapper?

    4. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Mike+Blakemore · · Score: 1

      This must have been an Anonymous Coward from Microsoft's Mojave Experiment team.

      You are wrong, Vista sucks. Let's look at Microsoft's Vista Edition comparison chart shall we?

      I can easily get a copy of XP Pro for about $150 online.

      Another $50 and I can get the worst, most horrible version of Vista (Home Basic).

      Slap on another $60 and Microsoft says I can have more fun.

      $40 more and I'm back to having less fun. :(
      Well, at least now I can get the Vista Business Downgrade to XP Pro!

      And for just $20 more I can make my brand new computer run like it's shitting down it's own leg (while running).



      But seriously, the thing I hate most about vista is the "easier networking connectivity" which is included in all four editions.

      The whole networking deal in Vista sucks. I've never wanted to smash a brand new computer to pieces before.

    5. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excuse me... If it needs 4Gb to run like XP ran in ONE, you have a problem considering that the damn thing didn't bring much to the plate.

    6. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I've got hardware that can more than handle Vista. There are a ton of problems with it, even for all of the improvements they made. Not all of them are Microsoft's fault (drivers for my video card are still nonfunctional), but they are still issues not manifested in XP. I've never had an issue with the speed of Vista's UI, but every time I attempt to use Vista I end up regretting it.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    7. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      He really needs to learn that Vista doesn't actually suck, Bob.

      The vast majority of people disagree.

      What better measure do you need that he is right and you are wrong? Mathematical proof of suckness?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      ...not stealing their other products!

      (cue boxing narrators) ...and it's a SELF-KO! Man, I can't believe he fell for the "piracy = stealing"! It's the oldest trick in the book! I hadn't seen a guy flame himself in a discussion so hard in a very very long time! What do you think Bob?
      - Yes, James, I'm sure the slashdot crowd is right now cheering at his opponent's victory. Let's look at that blow in slow-mo...

      s...t...e...a...l...i...n...g *PUNCH* W.H.O.O.O.O.A.A.A.A.A.A.A *SLAM* *BANG*

      Ouch, that's gotta hurt.

    9. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of people disagree.

      True, but I have yet to hear any actual, valid reasons why people hate it. Until I hear one, let alone more than one, I'll put the Vista hate firmly in the FUD camp.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    10. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      ...and it's a SELF-KO! Man, I can't believe he fell for the "piracy = stealing"!

      Props for having enough of a sense of humor to go along with the sportscasting thing, but I must point out that it is far from "fact" that piracy isn't stealing. I'm sure we could, if we tried, spark a 20-page flame war on this very subject. So, it isn't really shooting myself in the foot to take one side of a very undecided issue.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    11. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      FUD FUD FUD FUD FUD FUD FUD. I have 2 GB memory, and Vista runs just as well as XP did with 2. Spread less misinformation, please.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    12. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Ok. They unnecessarily rearranged things that users have learned over the last 5 years. Like the start menu, and the control panel. The network setup stuff is completely broken, and they've made it even harder to get to "advanced" setup options.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Of course now my mod points are gone. Couldnt have said it better.

    14. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The start menu is almost the exact same. The control panel IS the same, unless you aren't using the classic view (which can be said of XP as well). The network setup works just fine (unless you mean the useless setup wizard, which, again, was broken in XP too). I've never seen any problems with "advanced" setup options, so I'm not sure what you mean.

      The short version is that there isn't anything really borked that wasn't already a problem in XP (UAC aside, of course. UAC is the one legitimate problem Vista has... but it can also be turned off pretty easily). There isn't anything really better, either, unless you want Media Center, but I've never advocated upgrading from XP to Vista. Vista is as good as XP, just not better.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    15. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about the same thing? Vista start menu. XP start menu. See all those little changes? Every single one of them pisses users off. They've made it different for the sake of being different. It's supposed to make users feel that they are getting "something new". It's the same with the control panel.

      As for the networking stuff.. you have to dig about 10 layers to get to a list of network connections, then another 10 layers to get to IP settings. Yes, it was already bad in XP, but now they've made it worse in Vista. As for saying that it's "just as good", well that's just not true. Familiarity is worth something. And Vista isn't familiar.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    16. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1

      I say we got ripped off and piracy is our legitimate right.

      Not quite. However the following is viable:

      "The package said requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux."
      -unknown

    17. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Fine for me. At least allow me to redirect you to http://www.thepiratesdilemma.com/

      Altho it doesn't address the (non)equivalence of copyright infringement to stealing, it proves how piracy is beneficial for everyone AND a common commercial practice. Check it out.

    18. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by luke923 · · Score: 1

      The reason most people can't stand Vista is because it's bloated. Remember when it took less than 5 seconds for XP to load on a P3 w/ 256MB of RAM? Can't say that'll ever happen w/ Vista, even on a dualcore w/ 2GB of RAM. Why, because after installing Vista, not only is the OS inherently slow, it goes out of its way to be even slower. Nothing's more frustrating that learning that the "upgrade" uses over 500MB JUST ON THE OS -- esp. when the previous version required less the 120MB just to function. The worst part is that there's no justification for the bloat; otherwise, if there was some special feature, people would live with such corpulence.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    19. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which video card? what ui issues? specifics please.

    20. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      it took less than 5 seconds for XP to load on a P3 w/ 256MB of RAM

      WTF? BULL. I have a 600mhz, 256MB, and it takes over a minute - and that's with all sorts of services disabled.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    21. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Fail. You post a half dozen responses, all of which are useless.
      Just stop trying.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    22. Re:My stance on WGA and Vista by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      Just this last week I had an 18 yr old guy bring his brand new (less than two weeks) laptop to me. "It doesn't work" he said. "What doesn't work?" I asked "The whole thing. I called Dell they told me to put in the restore disks. It still doesn't work" "But what doesn't work?" "Nothing works, its slow, crashes and it sucks." You want *Valid* reasons? Here is one, 18year old males think Vista sucks compared to WinXP. That is valid.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  22. Skip downloading WGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. and just download the new wallpaper.
    http://benbrooks.co.uk/genuine/

    1. Re:Skip downloading WGA by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Yup, that's my Linux background now!

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Skip downloading WGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's awesome! Thanks! Hah Hah

  23. Are they *trying* to push people away? by Ynot_82 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know several people who've bought new machines in the last 6 months
    and been forced to have Vista pre-installed

    they didn't want it
    so pirated XP

    are they trying to push people away?
    cause it won't take much to annoy your userbase onto trying alternative OS's

    And I'll tell you what,
    once your average "mere mortal" Windows user, for whatever reason, tries Linux, and likes it
    his testimonial goes a long way with other mere mortals in the same boat

    1. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Skye16 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Trying to push people who aren't paying for their products away?

      God forbid any company do such a thing! IT'S THE FREELOADERS THAT MAKE THIS COUNTRY FREE!

      Seriously, if they don't like Vista, the best thing for them is to either a: buy XP or b: get smart, enterprising geeks like yourself to help them with this "linux thing".

      If they like it, use it! It's good for people to use what they like!

      Some people won't like it, and they'll decide not having a crappy (to them) experience is worth the X$ MS wants to charge them or the Y$ it costs for a Mac.

      But for fuck's sake, don't act like pushing people who didn't pay for the right to use your product away is a bad thing.

    2. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Ynot_82 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Trying to push people who aren't paying for their products away?
      God forbid any company do such a thing!"

      they paid for Vista (included in OEM cost of machine)
      most see it as unacceptable to pay twice

      "Seriously, if they don't like Vista, the best thing for them is to either a: buy XP or b: get smart, enterprising geeks like yourself to help them with this "linux thing"."

      A) no can do - XP is not (apart from select machines from Dell) sold anymore

      Don't act all high and mighty
      these are not people intentionally out to get something for nothing
      these are people who want to write their university coursework
      and are dissatisfied with the OS thrust upon them
      they paid money to MS, so obtain MS's prior OS

    3. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirated versions of XP will automatically be 'upgraded' to Vista.

    4. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you received Vista pre-installed, I believe you should still be eligible for a free (might be small charge for the media) "downgrade license" for XP-- ask the vendor you got the computer from.

      (Of course, this still leaves you installing XP yourself, which is a pain and a half on most computers that were built for Vista -- getting additional SATA drivers on before install without a floppy drive is a pain in itself --, but if they're pirating, then they're doing that much anyway.)

    5. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Shamenaught · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yes, driving away the freeloaders is a big risk for M$. How many illegal copies of windows XP do you think there are in the world? Now imagine if they all ran Linux instead.

      I saw a report recently that said the percentage of PCs with Linux pre-installed was 28 times what it was when vista first shipped. The actual 28 times figure is unimportant, it's more like 14 or 9 times if you look at the months before vista's release, but the actual market share is the important part. That's up to 2.8%, which is comparable to Apple's share.

      What does that mean? Apple's share may not be big, but it's big enough to draw developers like Adobe. When you consider the potential that many of the machines with XP/Vista pre-installed will have been dual-booted to Linux, I'd expect the percentage of new computers with Linux to beat the percentage of new Macs hands-down.

      There are still a lot of computers out there from past years, however, mostly running Windows XP. They'll probably be jumping to either Vista or Linux and, however much WGA they throw at the situation, they can't afford for them to jump to Linux even if it means making Vista easier to pirate, like by removing the reduced-functionality "kill switch" as they did in SP1.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    6. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They paid for *Vista*.

      Look, I paid for a Nissan Rogue. I like my Rogue. But if, for example, I felt like my penis was not quite large enough, I still don't have the right to roll into a Nissan dealership and roll off with a Nissan Xtera.

      Granted, we're talking real property vs. non-real property, but the fact that I bought one DOES NOT GIVE ME THE RIGHT TO TAKE WHATEVER ELSE I WANT just because I don't like what I bought.

    7. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      You're only *supposing* it's a real problem. And in reality, you could be right.

      But how, pray tell, do you justify to your shareholders "we decided to let people "steal" x number of our dollars, because we feel the Windows Ecosystem has the potential to bring us back 2x or x^2 or x^x percent return on our ... investment"?

      Sorry, but it's not going to fly dude.

    8. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look, I paid for a Nissan Rogue. I like my Rogue. But if, for example, I felt like my penis was not quite large enough, I still don't have the right to roll into a Nissan dealership and roll off with a Nissan Xtera.

      I don't know Nissan's product line, so I don't know whether your comparison is apt or not, BUT --

      If someone forces me to buy ${EXPENSIVE_PRODUCT_A} as part of a bundle, and I don't want it -- instead I want ${CHEAP_PRODUCT_B}, I'm not going to feel the least bit in the wrong for forcefully trading the ${EXPENSIVE_PRODUCT_A} I was saddled with for a ${CHEAP_PRODUCT_B}.

      Legally wrong? Sure. Morally wrong? In the case of software -- where they don't need to manufacture or ship ship physical objects, or otherwise incur costs, on account of my action -- I'm going to take a "no".

    9. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Shamenaught · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They could've justified it to shareholders the same way they justified the "We've decided to make our systems as incompatible with everything else as possible" conversation.

      They could write and release drivers that let them access Linux and Mac file systems, for example, or to have released proper specs for the NTFS system. They didn't though, on the grounds that it'd make moving away from their domination more likely.

      In-fact, they don't need to justify letting people steal as much as they'd need to justify spending on anti-piracy measures. Show them a graph showing how much has been spent on WGA versus how little profit it made them. Follow that up with a comment like "it's notable that as we spend more on these measures, a number of users will be moving to free alternatives such-as Linux, weakening our overall market dominance" and you have the shareholders on your side.

      --
      mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
    10. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 0

      Their use of XP with Vista license is perfectly legit, so there's no piracy.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    11. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I spent last night installing XP on a Toshiba Satellite A200 laptop for a friend who has tolerated Vista for about 6 months now.

      Not surprisingly, Toshiba (like Dell and many others) has signed a deal with the devil not to provide support for anything other than Vista (honestly, I can see why they might do a deal to pre-install Vista, but why stop loyal Toshiba customers from installing XP if they want to? Crazy).

      However, what is truly impressive is the hatred for Vista out there on the net, and the lengths that it inspires people to go to to get rid of it and, in the spirit of the net, help others get rid of it. Googling for info about getting XP up and running on this particular machine yielded pages and pages of helpful information about exactly what must be done to round up the necessary drivers (many from the OEM's who supplied the various components of the machine). Even better, a few heroes had actually compiled zip files containing every driver and distributed them via Rapidshare and the like.

      The other really startling thing was how many non-expert users were doing this. There were heaps of messageboard posts where inexperienced users basically begged for help to get XP working on their laptops. Due to the bod of Vista-hatred, the more tech savvy users were generally walking people through the process with a level of patience rarely seen on-line.

      I had the same experience installing XP on my Dell XPS 1530 (great computer, once you disinfect it) - there is basically a community dedicated to purging it of Vista.

      When you are inspiring legions of both expert users and ordinary non-techy people to go through the pain of installing an operating system using an ad hoc collection of unsupported drivers, something is badly, badly awry. I am critical not of MS so much as Toshiba, Dell and co - they are the ones who have made the key decision to support nothing but Vista. I wonder if they realise the lengths their users are going to to get around this choice?

      Incidentally, my friend's reaction was priceless when XP booted up quickly and quietly - "holy shit... you mean it's done? it's so... responsive! It's beautiful!" He then checked the memory usage and noted with awe that it was 120 megs after booting rather than 1 to 1.5 gigs for Vista.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    12. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      They could write and release drivers that let them access Linux and Mac file systems, for example, or to have released proper specs for the NTFS system. They didn't though, on the grounds that it'd make moving away from their domination more likely.

      And Linux just had to go and ruin things by making it work anyways.

    13. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Not everyone could even run Linux if they wanted to - e.g. accounting software, Photoshop, many games, etc. Don't throw wine in my face, it's more work than you'd ever let on in this discussion.

      Let's face it; Linux is not for everyone yet, and it won't be until major software vendors start making commodity software (Quickbooks, everything Adobe, etc) for Linux.

      But even beyond all that, not everyone knows a smart, enterprising geek who can teach them about Linux, and if they do, they probably don't know to ask.

    14. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I don't disagree with you in any way, I'm always curious why people are upset when their RAM is being used. As I understand it, Vista pre-loads into RAM applications that you use often, thus (ideally) speeding up load time. RAM is there to be used; why do we get upset when we see near-100% usage? Personally, I don't care what XP's RAM usage is when I boot up, as long as it's responsive. If increasing XP's RAM usage to 1.5GB on bootup by loading stuff I use regularly would make my applications load faster, I would beg for it to be done.

      Anyone have any ideas about this?

    15. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Assuming ${EXPENSIVE_PRODUCT_A} is Windows and ${CHEAP_PRODUCT_B} is Linux (and I can't see what else you could be referring to in this context), that's neither legally wrong (of course you can wipe the preinstalled OS) nor anything at all to do with WGA.

    16. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      In the context of the thread leading up to my comment, A is Vista, B is XP.

    17. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am critical not of MS so much as Toshiba, Dell and co - they are the ones who have made the key decision to support nothing but Vista. I wonder if they realise the lengths their users are going to to get around this choice?

      You do realize that Dell supports Ubuntu, right?

      Also, comparing an install of anything by a large system builder with a standard install of anything isn't really a fair comparison. After getting my laptop from HP the first thing I did was wipe and reinstall Vista. It was 10 times as responsive and used half as much memory. It was also otherwise impossible to remove all of HPs shit. Then I loaded Linux. If I had to pay the Microsoft Tax, I might as well dual boot.

      Then again, I forgot to add windows to grub. *shrug*

    18. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Vista doesn't seem to do it sensibly. Until a few months ago, I had 1GB in my Vista box. It was *dreadful*. Constantly swapping. TF2 took 5 minutes to get to the menu. Visual Studio was almost unusable; luckily I'm mostly a vimmer, so I wasn't affected too badly by that.

      The thing is, I didn't realise for quite a while exactly how much of an effect being low on RAM was having. I upgraded to 4GB and it was like a new machine.

      XP with 1GB RAM is a joyous, happy beast. Vista? Forget it. It's possible there's a knob I could have tweaked somewhere to improve the situation, but I certainly couldn't find it at the time.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    19. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista/XP, you think?

    20. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not everyone could even run Linux if they wanted to - e.g. accounting software, Photoshop, many games, etc"

      Drat! And I was just going to show how clever I was by installing it and then bragging "I too have Ubuntu."

    21. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because more often than not, all of that RAM is actually being used by useless system-level services (Indexing Service from XP anyone?), and not by actual pre-loaded software packages you normally use.

      And no matter what they claim, the OS does NOT like to release those resources, requiring you to manually kill the offending services/processes just to get enough RAM to run your games/Photoshop, etc. Explorer.exe taking up 35 - 80 MB of RAM while sitting idle (in XP at least, I know Vista is worse)? What. The. Fuck.

      Oh, by pre-load, you mean that stupid hacked-up XP version pre-fetch and page-to-disk/recall from disk scheme they run in Vista. It's total hackery that relies on you using SATA disks and whatnot. It falls flat if you are still using the old PATA drives that will sit there and grind in protest, exposing their dirty tricks (Yeah, it loads the prefetch pointer files into RAM, reads those, writes to a log file, loads program .dll files, pages those back out to disk, does a refresh write of the prefetch files to RAM, does a page to disk of the prefetch files, does a read of the data it just paged out to disk, sorts it in most likely-use order based on the average amount of program uptime recorded in a log file - creating more useless writes to disk, allots memory allocation in-order, and then sends most of the extra RAM back to useless system services - XP's version is more primitive, as it only runs Prefetch). :)

      I've lately started setting Process Explorer from Sysinternals as my default shell and just using the Run command from within it to execute my games and other programs. Saves massive amounts of RAM not having to load a complete desktop and other assorted crap that loads along with Explorer.exe and other crappy system processes.

      On my laptop, I use a custom theme and run nothing but Firefox 3, RoAClient, VLC and uTorrent anyhow, so I don't care that the system is hogging 256+ out of 512 MB of RAM just for system services. I use this machine for mainly email, mudding, sharing landscape/wilderness photo collections and watching -legit- movies.

      But yeah, whatevah :)

    22. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      Looking at the task manager shows the cache, which is ready to be freed and reallocated if needed.

      Check out the resource monitor instead and you'll see the really free memory. My computer has 1 gig of RAM and the task manager shows it with 1 meg free, but the resource monitor ignores the cache and shows the more accurate value of ~500 megs.

    23. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, we're talking real property vs. non-real property, but the fact that I bought one

      You mean personal property versus intangible property?

    24. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      I do realise that, but playing games is a priority so we need one of XP or Vista on there.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    25. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      While I don't disagree with you in any way, I'm always curious why people are upset when their RAM is being used. As I understand it, Vista pre-loads into RAM applications that you use often, thus (ideally) speeding up load time. RAM is there to be used; why do we get upset when we see near-100% usage? Personally, I don't care what XP's RAM usage is when I boot up, as long as it's responsive. If increasing XP's RAM usage to 1.5GB on bootup by loading stuff I use regularly would make my applications load faster, I would beg for it to be done.

      Anyone have any ideas about this?

      Just picking an easy to quote metric, I guess.

      You should read up on Vista's "helpful" pre-fetching though. It basically works so that if you play Quake III at 9pm on a Tuesday a couple of weeks in a row, then it "predicts" that you will want to do so the following Tuesday and starts loading the data into memory in anticipation.

      It seems to have two major overheads: (1) watching what you are doing so it can predict what you might be doing later; and (2) churning all that data from your hard disk into memory constantly.

      The machine is startlingly faster and more responsive running XP - I realise this is not purely RAM-related, but it is a reflection that the OS isn't absolutely pumping the system's resources for a benefit which is lost in the overall loss of performance.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    26. Re:Are they *trying* to push people away? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I said "ideally" for a reason... I think it would be awesome if they took Vista's prefetch idea and made it actually work well. I definitely wouldn't mind ~75% RAM usage if it were preloading things I actually need without killing my system in the meantime...

  24. colors by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Funny

    now microsoft has officially left it's users black and blue

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:colors by racermd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's funny is my desktop is intentionally black. Has been for years - through Windows 2000, Windows XP, and now Vista. I just like it that way.

      Active desktop? Puh-leeze.
      Pictures of cats? Why?!
      Patterns? Too distracting.
      Other colors? Meh.

      I once tried BGInfo but even that was a black background with green text. It lasted a week before I took it out and went back to basic black.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    2. Re:colors by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally prefer a nice medium-dark gray--a very neutral color.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:colors by Monoman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amen brotha! In the days of CRTs I started using black to avoid seeing the annoying edges around certain monitors.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    4. Re:colors by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      Ive used black with as few icons as possible on desktop as possible ... I find that any other colors are too bright and photos of any kind wig my eyes out with eye strain... the only desktop paper I've been able to use at all is the social d background... but most of it is black ;)

    5. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1: Take screenshot of desktop with dozens of files and icons.
      2: Replace wallpaper with screenshot
      3: Empty Desktop
      4: ???
      5: Tell user to reboot to fix problem, preferably 10 times.

    6. Re:colors by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did that to somebody at work when she forgot to lock her desktop for a meeting.... she almost had IT reimage her desktop to fix it before noticing that the rest of us were sitting around snickering at her.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    7. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying Black is the new Blue?

    8. Re:colors by QRDeNameland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pictures of cats? Why?!

      I can haz pie-ratted Win-does?

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    9. Re:colors by couchslug · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I once tried BGInfo but even that was a black background with green text."

      Black text would have been much less obtrusive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:colors by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about the standard #008080

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    11. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Black background is the best background.

      I intentionally set my background to black so that I can see people behind me in the reflection on the glossy screen of my laptop.

    12. Re:colors by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty happy with #000060 myself. I like a *little* bit of color, but not much.

    13. Re:colors by AnotherUsername · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer the standard #FF1492

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    14. Re:colors by redKrane · · Score: 0

      One can only imagine the psychological effects of a black background for hours a day over many years.

      --
      that's my word, holla...
    15. Re:colors by beav007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer the standard #8008135

    16. Re:colors by beav007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You missed some bits.

      2.3) Set the task bar to "Autohide" and move it to the top of the screen.
      2.6) If it's a desktop compter, use the monitor controls to stretch/move the screen upwards enough to hide the remaining visible part of the taskbar.

      AND
      Replace #3 with:
      3) Right-click desktop, go to "Arrange Icons By" -> and untick "Show Desktop Icons".

    17. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be good if MS would erase all theyr icons from the desktop... Damm you can't even see those systems.

    18. Re:colors by weetabeex · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there...

    19. Re:colors by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Desktop black: check
      Icons at a minimum: check
      Window style: classic; I go with "brick" with a black desktop
      Screen saver: none; powersave in battery mode

      Seriously...I like my stuff simple and organized. I'd definitely call this a feature. Then again, I don't give a shit. I buy almost exclusively Dell computers, and the OEM tying to the BIOS is a serious feature for me. Lets me almost entirely avoid the whole activation thing. If I had to do it over again, I'd buy a dell box instead of building a box for my media center. I'll run linux, or some civilized OS should one exist, on my homebrew boxes from now on.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    20. Re:colors by Chrutil · · Score: 1

      I once tried BGInfo but even that was a black background with green text. It lasted a week before I took it out and went back to basic black.

      I agree. The same thing happened to me. It's like they say - once you go black...

    21. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first thing I do upon a new Windows installation - can't stand the default Teletubbie hill or that awful blue color they chose

    22. Re:colors by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you didn't get it, #008080 is the default background for Windows 95/98

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    23. Re:colors by Paradoks · · Score: 1

      Same for me. Honestly, this sounds like a feature; if a friend would be so annoying as to use my computer and put a background on it, the WGA would helpfully get rid of it.

      Thanks, Microsoft, for finally making a default the way I like it.

      'course, now I have to go and start using a pirated copy of WinXP. Bother.

    24. Re:colors by the_B0fh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Still not anal enough to be Steve Jobs. He once spent 3 months selecting the perfect color for the NeXT cube. 400+ different shades of *BLACK*

    25. Re:colors by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

      I've been the say way since Windows 2.0.....

      --
      Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
    26. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, you like your stuff simple and organized but use that Windows mess?

    27. Re:colors by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      He once spent 3 months selecting the perfect color for the NeXT cube. 400+ different shades of *BLACK*

      I think he's color blind. It would explain why his initial machines tend to be black and white.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    28. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too! Black is best. Plus, windows RUNS faster without a desktop. Scary but true. Maybe it's just toggling the icons off (which I also do) that does it, I dunno.

    29. Re:colors by das_magpie · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just install a picture of bill gates with a whip or something. Ubuntu here everyone comes!

    30. Re:colors by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

      good grief... I can't even spell tonight... "same way".... argh......

      --
      Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
    31. Re:colors by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      I was trying to go more with the OMG PINK PONIES!!! in my failed attempt at humor.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    32. Re:colors by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      oops...posted bad link...meant to link here

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    33. Re:colors by zish · · Score: 0

      Baby, I got your number #8675309

      --
      Spork.

      P.S. Spork.
    34. Re:colors by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      my desktop is intentionally black

      that's cool and all.

      have you ever thought about, you know, interesting pictures and art and that kind of shit?

      ffffound.com is a pretty interesting site with many pics and images of all types. Some really tech stuff...also some more hipster artsy stuff.

      I find that having a thought provoking image on my desktop background prompts some creative thinking when I get to a dead end while i'm working...just sayin'

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    35. Re:colors by Dantoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they want to upset people using unlicensed installs, I wonder.....

      Wouldn't it be more effective to just force a desktop featuring Ballmer glaring out at you while simultaneously reaching for a chair?

    36. Re:colors by therufus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or better yet, arrange your icons in the shape of a penis with balls like the website is down.

      --
      You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
    37. Re:colors by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      your screenshot + going "hide all desktop icons" and drag the taskbar to look hidden.

      --
      signature is pants
    38. Re:colors by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Black on black, that's how I want it... I don't care if anyone can read it. I'm the DRIZZLE!"

    39. Re:colors by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I've historically used a black background, except for the long period where I used ZMatrix (green text on a black background). Recently though I've been using a Diablo III wallpaper which is mostly dark colors, and in Linux I use the Gentoo Emergence wallpaper now... I guess I got tired of black.

    40. Re:colors by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Odd. I read it as if you had spelled it right. Are my eyes dying?

    41. Re:colors by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      Me too.

      Unfortunately, my co-workers like to cowboy or screencap my desktop if I leave my office door unlocked while I go for coffee. Having it set to automatically return to a black background would be great.

      Too bad for me; I have a genuine copy of Windows. :-(

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    42. Re:colors by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was expecting 5 to be profit!!!!...

    43. Re:colors by Beale · · Score: 1

      Why stop there? Have an animated version of him running at you wielding the chair over his head and flinging it towards the screen, followed by a smashed glass and shaking effect.

    44. Re:colors by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Dont worry, that has never stopped Microsoft from borking a system

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    45. Re:colors by houghi · · Score: 1

      I would leave the icons working. It then is just the taskbar that doesn't work. Nothing is more frustrating then a system that works half of the time. If it doesn't work at all, users will just trow in the towel.

      Something I also did in the win95 times was replace the blue of BSOD with other colours and then just wait for the 'Yellow Screen Of Death', told them I had something extremely strange. Took them some 3 hours of checking each and every part of the machine, before I told them what I had done. Yes, they thought it was funny. :-)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    46. Re:colors by beav007 · · Score: 1

      I would leave the icons working. It then is just the taskbar that doesn't work. Nothing is more frustrating then a system that works half of the time. If it doesn't work at all, users will just trow in the towel.

      You say that like Windows doesn't do it by itself already...

    47. Re:colors by RadioElectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm really into the Windows Zune theme (black start/taskbars with orange buttons).

    48. Re:colors by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft will be outraged if they read your comment!

    49. Re:colors by Alpha+Whisky · · Score: 1

      I did a variant of that to myself, company policy was that PCs should be locked when unattended and you ran the risk of being written up in the company QHSE risk identifying system. So, I:
      1. Took screenshot of desktop logged into QHSE reporting system.
      2. Replaced wallpaper with screenshot.
      3. Locked PC.
      4. Dragged the "This computer is locked" box to the edge of the screen.
      5. Left it and waited.
      6. ???
      7. Never did work out how to "Profit".

      --
      it's = it is

      its = belonging to it

    50. Re:colors by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Ow, my eyes.

    51. Re:colors by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Almost as good as swapping the mouse and keyboard on two adjacent PCs, and waiting for someone to come along to try and use them ...

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    52. Re:colors by INT_QRK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am an avid user of Linux and free software, and I say "good for Microsoft." Stealing is immoral -- period. They have a right to protect their products. That said, whenever I find excellent Open Source that suits my needs, I use it, and usually make a donation if and when I decide to keep it. However, when an excellent quality proprietary product provides what I need, and can't find a satisfactory enough free aternative, then I gladly pay for it. I would never steal it. My main gripes against MS are asinine EULAS, unwanted or unneeded "upgrades" (especially those that degrade usability, and file formats that provide little added value, are prone to frequent corruption, and are intended only to force vendor lock-in), covert "calling-home," and sometimes poor performance. That said, some of their products really do, in my opinion, provide the best value in their fields.

    53. Re:colors by Braxton_the_Covenant · · Score: 1

      You sir are the master.

    54. Re:colors by geniepiper · · Score: 1

      Since Windows '95 my desktop has been intentionally black as well. I like it that way for the reasons you state and it just looks better to me.

    55. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEA ATHF, Numba one in the hood, G!

    56. Re:colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      almost as good as locking the cd and having it loop The Final Countdown by Europe......

    57. Re:colors by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      If you didn't get it, #008080 is the default background for Windows 95/98

      I know. I threw the hex into the GIMP's palette tool and pressed Enter ... and suffered a horrific flashback to the mid 90s. Sort of like the one I have whenever I see the heading bars on Slashdot.

    58. Re:colors by GuyverDH · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I think I'd have your socket screened for carbon buildup... =)

      --
      Who is general failure, and why is he reading my hard drive?
    59. Re:colors by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Funny
      When I do it, I usually leave the start menu in place but screenshot the desktop.

      Most users who would fall for it probably use the desktop for something but would still be able to sort of use their system with the start menu only but be unable to access documents they save there.

      Of course last april fools day I tried to do it to my roommate. I forgot I had done it and he didnt really react (turns out he had just blamed it on the computer messing up and was too lazy to reboot to fix it)..it wasn't until I tried to get a file from him that he had downloaded. The torrent client said it was saved to the desktop but I couldnt find it for the life of me. Took me a minute to realize what I had done...

      --
      Bottles.
    60. Re:colors by hostyle · · Score: 1

      I know Dave. I already said I was sorry about that.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    61. Re:colors by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      I like the way on my computer, when I press the black text on the black screen, a little black light shows up to tell me that I did it.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    62. Re:colors by donstenk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also black is energy and brightness saving as all pixels are off. Makes for more relaxing, uhm, darkness around the active windows.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    63. Re:colors by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      That background color only works with a dual monitors setup.

    64. Re:colors by gosand · · Score: 1

      I did that to somebody at work when she forgot to lock her desktop for a meeting.... she almost had IT reimage her desktop to fix it before noticing that the rest of us were sitting around snickering at her.

      This is a great trick.
      Back in the days of using the old Sun3 black and white terminals, we were able to do a screen cap of someone else's screen, and you could also launch apps on their screen.

      So it was trivial to capture their screen when they weren't looking, and then either set it as their background or just display it. Lots of fun.
      You can imagine the fun that was had with porn images. You could also cat files to their terminals.... one guy had a script called "pissoff" that would cat out a large binary file to every terminal window someone had open. Ahh the days of lax security.

      Once a coworker left her terminal unlocked, and I did an rlogin to another server, and set up a cron job that would email herself. She thought at first someone had hacked her password, but after changing that she kept getting them. She was on her way to the IT security guy when I told her I had done it.. but I never told her what I had done exactly, and I don't think she ever figured it out.

      This is what I refer to as the "good old days". :)

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    65. Re:colors by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Show me a stable laptop system that can run AutoCAD, RISA 3D, and has printer drivers for a Kyocera-Mita 3650 (our $20,000 scanner/plotter) without needing $1000 in tech support a year and I'm ready to jump. XP hasn't crashed on me in...well, since the motherboard went bad about two years ago. In business, you stick with what works. If I could have kept NT3.5, I probably would have.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    66. Re:colors by donstenk · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we were talking about CRT. Well, I was.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    67. Re:colors by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      ...profit!!!

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    68. Re:colors by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      I once worked at the word processing traffic desk at a major NYC law firm -- it was a madhouse -- and switched the mice on the two logging PCs one Friday afternoon.

      It was awful. My poor co-workers couldn't figure out what was wrong and the lawyers were having coronaries.

      I finally made a "helpful suggestion" that they check the connections.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    69. Re:colors by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      With a little more work you could make dozens of fake icons covering the whole desktop (preferably exact copies of the real ones) and randomly hide the real icons in the mess.

      Oh, and I didn't ever know it was possible to change the colour of the BSOD. Do you remember how you did it?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    70. Re:colors by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is for Windows 95 and Windows 98 First Edition, but it certainly isn't for Windows 98 Second Edition. That last one is a kind of blue instead of a kind of green.

    71. Re:colors by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for an unmutable audio track to accompany it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    72. Re:colors by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      No, It's the background for that one too and NT4. You're looking at active desktop activated which was on by default for Win98 and disabled once Plus! was installed.

      Win ME used the blue background that was Win2K.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    73. Re:colors by cstdenis · · Score: 1

      I already keep my taskbar autohide at the top of my screen you insensitive clod.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    74. Re:colors by alabandit · · Score: 1

      what you can have colors other than black???? had it black since 98, most of the time i don't see my desktop. i guess if it really stress you, install one of the photo image changes give it one picture and set it a couple of seconds behind windows

      --
      "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)
  25. Answer: Naggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Question: People who annoy you?

    1. Re:Answer: Naggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question: People who annoy you?

      That's not a question, it's a statement.

      (Is that the sort of thing you had in mind? :p )

    2. Re:Answer: Naggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

  26. Wake up and smell the exodus... by barnyjr · · Score: 1

    Microsoft needs to get a clue and realize that they need to make Windoze free. Linux is making giant strides in the usability department (albeit still a long way off for a lot of people) and people are going to get tired of shit like this. Microsoft is starting to remind me of the recording industry. Either adapt to the way things are changing, or go the way of the dodo. They can still make mountains of money from their other products...

    1. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by Urd.Yggdrasil · · Score: 1

      Yea I mean, how dare they expect to be paid for a product they made. How dare they. How DARE they!

    2. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      They can pretend they are bentley all they like. In the
      end of the day they are at best Yugo and they might as
      well get used to the situation.

      This isn't about their sense of entitlement. This is
      about how they are going to survive in the current
      market such as it is.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Yes!! The end is near!! Microsoft is on its deathbed!!!!

      Yawn . . . . .

      This type of post is becoming a slashdot cliche. It should have its own cool name.

    4. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily free, but how about something reasonable. $350 for Vista ultimate is not reasonable for the functionality provided, given alternatives in the market.

      And while they're at it, how about 2 versions, not 9? (or 7 or 10 or whatever) Home/Professional was fine.

      I'd be perfectly willing to pay $100 for a decent operation system, but on the other hand I already have 5 legitimate copies of XP, so I don't need to buy any more from Mircosoft for the foreseeable future.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    5. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      ....and I should have kept my Apple stock instead of selling @ 90. MS will push people away, but to Apple, not Linux. Because OSX runs MS Office and a host of other common applications such as Quickbooks for small businesses as well as Adobe's line up. While it does cost money to switch, Apple already has many of the common applications being used by people right now. It's not "Something mostly compatible". It is Quickbooks. And that means a lot to people wanting to switch.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    6. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if Microsoft should make their software "free". Older operating systems that they refuse to profit from anymore? Sure. It makes sense. If you openly refuse to profit from a product you've made, I think you should do what's best for the world at large and toss it into public domain.

      And they don't even have to do that right away. They can wait a year or two until adoption of whatever has stagnated to some point. This would actually be a really nice PR move for them. A lot of companies still require some really outdated versions of Windows because of the software they use. It just makes it easier for them to continue using a Microsoft product.

      In the mean time, it would also be nice if they didn't cripple the software they don't intend on profiting from anymore.

    7. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by barnyjr · · Score: 1

      I never said they were on their deathbed. I was inferring that their customers will eventually get tired of this stuff. I guess I was too obtuse when I said that they would go the way of the dodo. I'll spell it out for you... EVENTUALLY this sort of narrow-mindedness about older generations of products will lead to dissatisfaction. Windows XP offers very little that other OS's don't have for free. Thus I made my statement that they shouldn't be charging for their operating systems... especially their old ones that aren't even supposed to be sold any more.

      Geeze I even made reference to the mountains of money they still make on their other products. Doesn't sound a bit like I was saying Microsoft is dead. Reading comprehension FTW!

    8. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      While I agree that Microsoft's business model needs to change, I don't think making Windows free is the solution. It costs a buttload of money to produce an operating system; devs need to get paid somehow. It does, however, need to be cheaper, smaller, faster, and easier to use. If that means a low-cost (or free) base operating system with additional feature modules available for purchase, then so be it - but it should not be so expensive to get a commercially supported operating system.

    9. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how fast WINE will evolve. If it runs the Windows version of MS office well, that reason would disappear.

      For me personally, the main reason not to ditch my Windows partition yet are Windows games. Day Of Defeat:Source is currently broken under WINE, and Direct3D performance in WINE is still rather weak. So it is "something mostly compatible" at the moment. But that could improve.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    10. Re:Wake up and smell the exodus... by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      MS will push people away, but to Apple, not Linux.

      To both, not just Apple...

      While it does cost money to switch

      ...and that is why it will be to both.

      Consider: why should anyone buy a completely new computer just to get a different operating system, when there is nothing wrong with their current machine (except for its current MS OS)?

      Further: why should one, after getting fed up at being treated like a criminal by MS while using its proprietary operating system, switch to yet another proprietary operating system?

      You don't seriously believe that Apple would still be "nice" to its customers if it had 90% of the market and people were pirating its software do you? Of course Apple doesn't have the piracy problem because they control their own hardware platform too, and they like "control" just as much as MS does, which is why they sue anyone who tries to make a clone of their hardware. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me...

      Yes, some will go to Apple, but some, who have gotten sick of the whole proprietary operating system madness, with its EULAs, its black-box interface style (never knowing what the OS is doing or why), look-but-don't-touch mentality (Father Bill & Brother Ballmer have already vetted the code, no need for anyone else to see it, and you can trust them, of course), never mind the customer-is-assumed-to-be-a-thief mindset, will just get fed up... and install Linux (or a *BSD).

      [/self = 100% Windows Free for more than a decade]

  27. Trend Setting Style by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    I can see it now... at a social site near you...

    omg guyz. how 2 do iconz? i made my scrn black like all cool screenies r. but i cant make genuine windows iconz lyk evr1 haz. plz help!!!!!!

    Watermarks - they're the new black.... which is also the new black.

    Oddly enough - most Windows systems I have to deal with already have a black background.

  28. Pfff.... No imagination by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 5, Funny

    They need to get more creative. Here's a few ideas:

    1) Cause the NIC to drop random ammounts of packets at random times.

    2) Change the wallpaper from Black Screen to one with a letter ending with "... The police are on their way".

    3) Every 2 minutes all keys on your keyboard get randomly swapped around.

    4) Swaps the mouse buttons. Or moving the mouse left, moves it right, up, down, etc.

    5) All print jobs only result in large words in upper case saying "PIRATE ALERT!"

    6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

    7) Every 10th web page visited would be redirected to goatse (is that site still around?)

    You get the idea... now hurry up so that people get fed up faster and switch to Linux.

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
    1. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by ooburns · · Score: 3, Funny

      And change the Windows XP logo at bootup to large, frindly letters that read Don't Panic.

    2. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by microbee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or just pop up a lock-out box and force user to type "I am a pirate and I am ashamed of myself". Three times.

    3. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forces you to win a round of minesweeper each day. ...and the dimensions of the game board increase by one every few days.

    4. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...now hurry up so that people get fed up faster and switch to Linux.

      You want fed up of people dealing with their operating system to switch to Linux?

    5. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

      You had me up until that one... How would users tell the difference if MS decided to use #6? Windows already randomly waits a few minutes for no apparent reason on startup and shutdown...

      And the 20s HDD bursts happen all the time, not just at "special" times. Out of the blue, Windows decides to flog the disk, while the user gets to wait. I think it has something to do with the pagefile, but of course, Windows doesn't provide any meaningful information about why it has decided to stop responding for 15-30s at a time.


      My Linux ad - "If you have enough memory, you can turn off swap."

    6. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X) All desktop event sounds are replaced with looping wavs of the original Star Trek red alert klaxon. All equalizer channels unmuted and set to full volume.

    7. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (is that site still around?)

      yeah its goatse.cn now though. Damn the christmas islands and their censorship.

    8. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      I think that is the point. If you randomly introduce rubbish into your OS people will mistake the rubbish as just more of the rubbish you deliver to legitimate customers.

      Then you develop a bad name for the quality of your product... ...I mean a WORSE name...

      Since Vista is a no go area, they most likely wont even consider upgrading at that point.

    9. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7) Every 10th web page visited would be redirected to goatse (is that site still around?)

      Yes. The original .cx site got shut down, but it has a new home at http://goatse.cz if you are still interested.

    10. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      8)........randomly crash

    11. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Yourself · · Score: 0

      8) Two words: goatse

    12. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by neonsignal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Some more ideas:
      • Every now and then put up a text screen with undecipherable gibberish and a blue background.
      • When a printer is not plugged in, hang the application for 30 seconds before putting up an error message.
      • Gradually leak memory until the computer crawls and has to be rebooted.
      • Automatically download updates that use the entire modem bandwidth and install software that the user didn't ask for.
      • By default enable all daemons so that the user doesn't have any memory waste.
      • Provide a zero configuration firewall that doesn't block spyware sending messages out.
      • Build keyboards with a system key near the most used keys on the keyboard.
      • Distribute word processing software that by default can't load up documents from previous versions of the same software.
      • Pop up messages warning of dire consequences whenever manufacturer supplied drivers are installed.
    13. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by LihTox · · Score: 3, Funny

      8) All open windows slowly slide down the screen until only their title bars are visible (although the user can keep pulling them back up as needed).

    14. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      "I am a pirate and I am ashamed of myself"

      I prefer the Devo version: I'm a big pirate and I like to steal!

      You remember Devo... right?

    15. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by smussman · · Score: 1

      No, no, he was discussing features they should add ... not features they already have ;)

    16. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... I'm pretty sure #6 is a feature that is already part of XP...

    17. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Windows is pretty aggressive about trying to insure that there is a large chunk of ram available if needed. So it's always writing what's in memory to the pagefile, so if it needs it for something else it's instantly available. It actually works pretty well on low ram systems, but it seems that Windows doesn't change it's behavior even if the system has gobs of ram already available, which is pretty annoying especially on laptops with their slower drives.

    18. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > 6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

      I'm pretty sure they've already implemented this one, at least on MY Windows computer.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

      4) Swaps the mouse buttons

      Wasn't this a Windows98 "feature"?

    20. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that means there's something wrong with your installation of Windows.

    21. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      6) Boot sequence and shutdown sequence get 5 minutes added on to them. Hey MS, don't forget to make sure you cause the hard drive light LED to flicker a lot while the users wait around so they think it's something going on. While you're at it, randomly flicker that HD LED every few minutes for 20 seconds at a time.

      Uh, doesn't it already do those things?

    22. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by anss123 · · Score: 1

      I think they do all this already:

      1) In their wireless implementation
      2) With help of addware
      3) Called sticky keys and billed as a feature
      4) All cheap wireless optical mice do this, and what do pirates use?
      5) Garbaged print output, check.
      6) Boot slows down by age, check. Random HD flicker, only in Vista but check.
      7) Geeks visit slashdot, so check.

      Not that pirates would switch to Linux for that reason. How can you pirate something that's free?

    23. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by pla · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that means there's something wrong with your installation of Windows.

      I've seen that behavior on just about every XP installation I've ever used, not just my own... It will have absolutely nothing going on, and the desktop becomes completely unresponsive for 15-30s while flogging the disk. Some days it happens once all day, some days it happens twice an hour. I also find it much more pronounced on slower single-drive systems (aka "notebooks"), while it appears as merely a 3-5s hiccough on a system with a pair of 7200RPM drives.

      I suspect it as something pagefile-related, because if you completely turn off the pagefile, that problem vanishes instantly... Of course, XP does not like having the pagefile turned off, and a number of other things break (as well as a scarily large percentage of 3rd-party software that allocates huge amounts of of RAM it will never use and counts on paging to keep the working set manageable).

    24. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by rfc11fan · · Score: 1

      So how would that be different from a copy of Windoze operating in its usual way?

    25. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by gid13 · · Score: 1

      They may have to remove half of these for legit users before anyone could tell the difference.

    26. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Odd. I had my pagefile set to 2GB for over a year and never saw that issue, and reducing the pagefile to 512MB has had no adverse effect. Perhaps it's caused by having the pagefile set to "let windows decide the size"?

    27. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Wait, ... oh, very clever! Windows already does all of that. In fact, I think I'll just whoosh myself and save you the trouble. Whoosh!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    28. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      3) Every 2 minutes all keys on your keyboard get randomly swapped around.

      Speaking of which, for some reason I wish Windows had a "ROT-13" keyboard layout.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A watermark on printouts mentioning the print came from a pirated copy of windows could be very effective.

    30. Re:Pfff.... No imagination by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I read somewhere that recommended upping the page file size because I kept getting the message about Windows increasing my page file size. Never had a problem after that. Speaking of which, I reinstalled XP since then and I probably should do that again, if I can remember what I set it to...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  29. I always set my desktop backgrounds to black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for saving me a step, Microsoft.

  30. Nagware by Speare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, Windows is essentially a nagware product now? Choose to pay or not, depending on whether you think it'll be less painful? When will they append third-party advertisements to every file you save? When will it whisper subliminal insults into your audio stream?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Nagware by jcgf · · Score: 1

      I think that feature is called "Windows Sounds" or some such. I'm offended by the "Startup" one the most. They will even tell you that they didn't have a musician create it, they just had a guy throw some sounds together that "sounded good to the market research group"(sic). I've also noticed that if you play with audacity a bit, you can hear Baal's voice cursing you (just run a low pass filter on "startup.wav" or whatever the file is set it to about 400Hz, then have a high pass knock out anything under 80Hz).

    2. Re:Nagware by Locutus · · Score: 1

      subliminal insults out the sound card? more likely something like this in a soft hush female voice:

      "Windows Vista is a great OS! Windows Vista is a great OS! You deserve to have Windows Vista, a great OS!"

      You know this is all about forcing XP users to move to Vista and nothing more. Or is it to move those XP users to Linux?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  31. this happened to me, a legit user by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i paid for windows vista ultimate edition *waits for laughter to die down* but after a few months, i discovered that the machine i installed it on had some dodgy RAM and i had to replace it. i don't know if it was because i changed the RAM or because the bad RAM corrupted something, but after that Microsoft decided that my copy of Windows was pirated, and put a permanent message in the lower-right corner of my machine telling me as much, and refused to let me use certain features, such as the Aero graphics enhancements.

    personally, i suggest microsoft take a page from our founding fathers, and adopt a more "innocent until proven guilty" attitude (for example, offering a way to call them up and verify your CD Key) before implementing more draconian punishments upon the convicted!

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You paid for it... I hear you get support with that. Much better support than IRC, mailing lists, or direct email addresses of potentially helpful developers. How did your paid support work out? If it didn't help, were you able to sue them for damages?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Butisol · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Something like, "This operating system will go into reduced functionality mode in seven days due to suspected la la la. You may call 1-800-***-**** to verify that your copy is la la la and keep full functionality. Thank you for being our customer, and we're extremely sorry about the whole Windows Vista thing." How hard is that?

    3. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by aerthling · · Score: 2, Informative

      i suggest microsoft take a page from our founding fathers, and adopt a more "innocent until proven guilty" attitude

      That's exactly what Microsoft have done here. This is just a reminder that they may be a victim of piracy, and only if their license has been examined and found to be invalid.
      Users aren't being punished, they're just being alerted that their operating system isn't licensed.

    4. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have called microsoft a number of times to help with Windows XP activation because the user had lost there discs, and my disc and their key (both legitmate) caused "windows not to be verified properly". It has always been quick and painless. There is definitly an option to call them.

    5. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by nku · · Score: 1

      Users aren't being punished...

      Then why won't they let the user use all the features? Like Aero graphics enhancements?
      Oh may be using the feature is punishment.

    6. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      What a load of rubbish THAT is.

      Reduced functionality and the fun and games that WGA appears to be bringing to the fore is actually punishment, NOT alerting the users that their system might be pirated.

      Heh... Not that it is much of an issue. I don't use Vista and I only use XP where it's only absolutely needed instead of Linux. Not many instances of that sort of thing these days.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    7. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      more often then not this is because unbeknownest to you, you really are using a pirated copy. There has been massive amount of counterfeiting, dodgy ram doesn't take you from legit to pirated, it could take you back to being unactivated but not pirated. I suggest if you really did buy it then you ring them, if it is pirated they will give you a free copy for reporting it to them and if not they will fix it.

    8. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      personally, i suggest microsoft take a page from our founding fathers, and adopt a more "innocent until proven guilty" attitude (for example, offering a way to call them up and verify your CD Key) before implementing more draconian punishments upon the convicted!

      personally I would suggest if you paid for it you actually take a look in the box, there you will find the telephone number to ring which you can give them the key and if you really did pay for it they will assist you and even give you an alternate key if for some reason the one you have is legit and not bought from dodgy counterfeiter at the local computer markets or yum cha shop.

    9. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do get an option to activate it again and there is a "activate by phone" option. Try using that and you'll be amazed at how fast your copy of vista is legit again.

    10. Re:this happened to me, a legit user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be the RAM.

      Vista's activation generates a hash based on the serial numbers of your hardware and uses that as a key to create its own cert. If any hardware changes, the hash generated during start up does not generate a matching cert, and the copy is deemed unauthorised.

      All you can do is call MS and ask them to reactivate your software - shouldn't cost you anything and as long as you're not calling too often, they're alright about it.

      The activation crap catches out small builders or software vendors that issue dozens or hundreds of copies with the same license key, and keys that they have been circulating on the undernet. Otherwise, it's just theatre.

  32. Same on Vista by poached · · Score: 1

    It's the same behavior on Vista. It won't let me update windows defender, replaces my desktop screen with black, and has that "your copy of windows is not genuine". Lovely. For people pirating Windows XP, look for the corporate edition so your copy will pass WGA test without cracks. For vista lovers, well, even a corporate edition will require activation so I don't know the solution there.

    Running unverified cracks from the web is like having sex with a prostitute without protection - don't do it. Your computer will end up with a funny itch.

  33. As for authorized copies of windows by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

    They give you a blue screen very often. See? By paying for it, you can get the color version.

    1. Re:As for authorized copies of windows by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm quite tired of people claiming Windows BSODs all the time. I'm as big a Linux fan as the next guy (I run Gentoo myself) but my laptop has bluescreened exactly once since I bought it in April 2007, and that was caused by Netflix's IE-only video player; it has not happened again.

      But maybe that's because I'm among the few people that don't drag their Windows installations through the disease-ridden dregs of the internet (by which I mean warez sites, porn sites, etc).

  34. Bull by jmorris42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Most people I know who run 'stolen' software don't have the funds, are not otherwise law-breakers,
    > and are not aware of alternatives.

    Oh bull, if they can afford the computer they could have afforded to get the OEM preload instead of the pirate version from the neighborhood screwdriver shop. Or if they built it themselves then they damned sure could have sprung for an OEM copy when they bought the other bits. Most custom built machines are gaming rigs these days and if you can afford the video card for gaming you can afford a copy of XP. IF you can afford the GAMES you can afford XP... oh, they bootleg the games too.

    And yes, they are probably lawbreakers in other areas too... anything THEY decide they should be able to do they probbaly do.

    The only sensible thing is your attempts to get em on a legal alternative.

    Stopping bootleg software should be the #1 priority of the Free Software movement as it is our primary competition. The main argument one hears when pitching Free (talking about individuals here, large installs do pay) is that they argue back that what they have is also free, in that it either came preloaded and thus they have no idea how much of the purchase price was the OEM licenses or they are using bootleg software that is 'free.' If people actually had to PAY for software like Office, OO.o would be installed a lot more often.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Bull by geekoid · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Come out of your ivory tower.
      You can get a decent 2 year old computer for 100 bucks.

      Since they aren't breaking the law, I don't understand why that's brought up.

      There are people that just use it for basic computing, not games.

      "The only sensible thing is your attempts to get em on a legal alternative."
      Which is what the poster is doing.

      "Stopping bootleg software should be the #1 priority of the Free Software movement as it is our primary competition. "
      true.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Bull by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of them upgraded old computers with XP and Office they 'borrowed' from work. Custom gaming rigs exist in a parallel universe for the typical home user.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Free Software Movement has nothing to do with the price of software. It has to do with your rights to freely use it, modify it, and share your modifications. Free as in freedom, not free as in beer.

    4. Re:Bull by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Come out of your ivory tower.
      > You can get a decent 2 year old computer for 100 bucks.

      Yup. And unless the original owner was also a pirate it will have a COA sticker on the side of the case for a version of XP. Ok, if you don't get the original install media, the recovery partition is shot or it was a corporate machine that was imaged you might have to hit the Pirate Bay for an install disc or ask around, but you are still morally (and mayby even legally) in the right because that machine is licensed to run XP. Any machine so old it shipped with 98, ME or the W2K bug is probably too old for XP without a major infusion of hardware... and you are right that a machine that already has XP can be had for $100 so the argument goes circular here.

      No, the problem is too many people buy from dodgy dealers or build a machine themselves and decide that the license can be skipped in favor of a bigger hard drive or a lower selling price. We need to be doing more than Microsoft to bring those practices to an end, especially when shops sell machines with bootleg software.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:Bull by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > The Free Software Movement has nothing to do with the price of software.

      You know that. I know that. But it is a lousy argument to open with. Most people will happily wear chains so long as they come in designer colors and don't cramp them NOW. Once someone get some Freedom though they usually start noticing the difference eventually, but it usually takes saving them some cash or getting past an immediate obstacle to get em to give our way a try. Or if the Free alternative is clearly better as in Firefox.

      Which is a perfect example. Firefox is enough better than IE that just about everyone who sees it and is clueful enough to download a copy for themselves does so. OO.o is still stuck at close to 0% of Windows desktops. It is free and Free but for most people Office is 'free for me' so change doesn't happen. Because even the most ardent OO.o supporter won't make the argument that OO.o is better than MS Office. Good enough and $0 would be an argument if people were spending $399 of their own money for Office but that never happens. The token box sits on store shelves and collects dust. If people can't get it at greatly discounted prices they 'obtain' it for zero.

      My argument is if we could raise the effective price for MS Office to $100-$200 we would see massive adoption of OO.o in the home and SoHo environments and push adoption into the corporate accounts bottom up as their employees demonstrated skill with OO.o instead of MS Office.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:Bull by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but Microsoft doesn't license a machine to run Windows, but it licenses copies of Windows. I'm sure Microsoft's stance would be that pirated XP is still illegal even if the user has an unused (unusable?) OEM license.

      That being said, I don't have a problem with people who pirate software they legitimately own anyway.

    7. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be true in the US but it certainly isn't in India.

      I've built my own machine 6 years ago at a total cost of Rs 20,000. The cost of XP, when I inquired was Rs 8600 for Home edition! That's nearly half the cost of my machine and about a month's salary for me! So I got a pirated version for Rs 150 thank you very much.

      >And yes, they are probably lawbreakers in other areas too... anything THEY decide they should be able to do they probbaly do.

      I know lots of guys like me out here. And we _aren't_ lawbreakers in other areas (well, as far as I know) :-)

    8. Re:Bull by jimicus · · Score: 1

      > Most people I know who run 'stolen' software don't have the funds, are not otherwise law-breakers,
      > and are not aware of alternatives.

      Oh bull, if they can afford the computer they could have afforded to get the OEM preload instead of the pirate version from the neighborhood

      It's not the cost of Windows that's the issue.

      It's all the other software you buy at the same time to go with it. Office, for instance - I understand there's a cheaper "home" version available today but until recently the UK individual price for Office was £400 per copy. You get drastic discounts (on the order of 50-75%) as soon as you start entering volume licensing agreements, but they're only open to 5 or more copies - it's easy to imagine a small business with 2 or 3 computers can't afford this.

    9. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your entire post is so full of arrogant assumptions, it's complete rubbish. I ran a pirate copy of Windows for years because, believe it or not, I couldn't afford it. If I could afford it, I likely wouldn't be running a noisy piece of junk Dell. So, this means I'm also likely a criminal in other areas and pirate all my games? Sorry bud, but that's complete horseshit.

      You're the kind of jumped-up twat that thinks they know everything about everyone and ultimately turns people away from open source. I'd give you and whatever you were pushing a wide margin too.

      Stopping bootleg software should not be the number one priority for open source - how about writing solid, usable software that competes on its merits.

    10. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is it to get a computer? you can pick them up for next to nothing.
      And yet the OS can cost several times as much as the hardwarde...
      Not everyone had a 'killer rig', Mr. One eye.

      And for 'free software' - when its user interface is up to scratch, people will use it (eg - gimp).

      As for me, I finally have a legit copy of Office... And I really cbf installing it over ooo.

    11. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your answer is complete bullshit and the people that modded it insightful are morons. The original poster was talking about pirated software in general, not just about one program. Take the average PC of a 14 year old kid in Bulgaria and sum up the retail prices of all software you find on it. There is no way anyone except very rich people could pay for that. Software is much more expensive than hardware. That is why you will have a hard time finding a PC on the world that doesn't at least contain one pirated application.

      You arrogant, filthy rich prick.

    12. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you need Vista for DX10.

      The whole reason I switched from a pirated version of XP to a pirated version of Vista is DX10!

    13. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, you're dumb. A person can have a decent life that includes a computer, then suddenly be disabled somehow, maybe lose the preponderance of their possessions, their home, everything but what they can carry... and since it can take two or three years to get a hearing from Social Security disability, they might be stuck walking from place to place, sleeping on couches or in shelters, in the hospital, or under the fattest evergreen trees as the local college until rousted by the cops. Throughout this, they may continue to use this fabulous jewel of a computer that you claim allows them to afford everything. Such a person can make maybe 340.00/mo. through their state's social services, but that isn't even enough to eat on, especially during those times when they have no access to a kitchen. It is conceivable that a person like this might be able to continue using their computer and open wireless connections, despite their situation. So they have a computer, and use it, but they can't "afford a computer." They can't afford software. They can't afford a lot of the things you take for granted, failing to think past your belt buckle because you just can't see it anymore. A modern OS of the most compatible platform and modern software is required for such a one to continue to communicate, to be creative, to escape for a little while from their own dispossession and disability. Such a one as that might get pissed off by such a one as yourself, and your worldview that rarely extends past the crenelated wall of Diet Coke bottles around your keyboard. "You, sir, are and idiot."

    14. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mistake to think that unlicensed use of software or other media equates to a lost sale. Most would never buy the stuff that is not absolutely necessary. Perhaps you think merely from your own demographic. You might have a nice job that allows you a certain amount of disposable income--that you truly think of as "disposable." MOST people are not as clever as you to get in a situation where they might be a healthy, bright, white, male from a fine nuclear family that has the resources and foresight to provide them with a good education beyond high school. MOST people, in MY experience, do not have any disposable income at all. You are blessed to be able to make your way as you have, but that blessing may not be your will to power alone. Your fitness depends also on externals, and not everyone in the world has equal access to these.

    15. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they can afford the computer

      because i have no real interest in being "top-of-the-line", i got my last 3 computers for free by cannibalizing parts from other older computers. i haven't paid for a computer in probably 15 years. people are always junking their old computers to upgrade to newer models even though the old ones work just fine for everything i need.

      the only problem is they usually come with no OS or with an old version of windows.

    16. Re:Bull by icoer · · Score: 1

      Oh bull, if they can afford the computer they could have afforded to get the OEM preload instead of the pirate version from the neighborhood screwdriver shop.

      Your assuming new hardware with this argument and I'm sure that there are many who fall into this category. There is however another category of people, namely those who get decommissioned hardware from government/school/business. Many of these machines have had the hard drive wiped before being auctioned and sell for almost nothing. If your a single mom who is able to pick up a computer for almost nothing and a friend offers to install XP for you..... Your argument is still valid, but please realize that it doesn't apply to all pirated versions.

    17. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In poor countries, people sometimes spend a few months' wages to buy even a cheap computer, most likely of no particular brand, just assembled out of pieces by a cheap shop.

      Now tell me it's fair to ask those guys to set aside another month's salary to buy the software for it.

      Strangely though, as a student in a rich country, you can have better discounts than anyone in a poor country.

    18. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just spent a couple years as an IT Peace Corps volunteer in The Gambia and all the machines are donated. I looked into the cost of buying an OEM copy of windows, it is about the average *yearly* salary of the typical Gambian (who is lucky enough to be employed, that is). Times that by 20 for a typical donated computer lab, and you can see how prohibitive it actually is.

      An no, the machines don't come with XP licences installed.

      And no, the donors don't think to buy them to donate with the machines.

      Your post clearly shows you have no understanding of the computer usage in the developing world, those who I have seen first-hard are hit the hardest by these stupid WGA schemes.

      As for Linux options (I'm sure your knee is jerking to write about them), they just aren't viable without high-bandwidth internet. I'm guessing your DSL/cable modem has more bandwidth than the WHOLE country of the Gambia. When a yahoo web-mail page takes 4-15 minutes to load on a typical connection, downloading linux updates just isn't an option.
       

    19. Re:Bull by wertigon · · Score: 1

      "Oh bull, if they can afford the computer they could have afforded to get the OEM preload instead of the pirate version from the neighborhood screwdriver shop. Or if they built it themselves then they damned sure could have sprung for an OEM copy when they bought the other bits."

      You know, I'm so tired of this argument. The problem isn't that Windows is expensive - It's fairly inexpensive in comparison. The problem is, the Windows ecoosystem has a lot of other proprietary software which charge a premium and try to squeeze out every last penny from their customers.

      Take Adobe. They wouldn't survive if there weren't for the piracy. The only reason CS3 costs as much as it does, is because the alternatives sucks (Photoshop still offers the best pipeline compared to the other tools, After Effects is virtually untouchable, and there is no real alternative to Premier Pro either - the list goes on). Each of these programs cost atleast $500. So, yes, you can get a decent computer. That's $1000. Add CS3 ($1700) and Windows Vista Ultimate ($300), and you have to shell out $3000 - The cost is increased threefold. If it was a $500 computer sold at a bargain price it's increased five-fold. I could buy two more computers with those money if it were all free (as in beer).

      I'm not a bitter little hamster - People obviously like shelling out for Adobe else they'd be out of business - but, when the price of a computer totals three to five times what it's worth... You start looking for alternatives.

      --
      systemd is not an init system. It's a GNU replacement.
  35. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great ID!;anyway;

    Yet another nail in microsoft's coffin. I.E., excuse to move to unix.

  36. Back when I used Windows (98) my desktop was black by Britz · · Score: 1

    Black is a good background color. When first I used IceWM I had a black background as well, but changed to the default blue of IceWM, because I liked it better. I know have the default blue of KDE without a picture. I think black would be good for many people with an awful taste they dislike themselves...

  37. That sucks! by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I am using a legitimate copy of XP. I would like so see what would happen when my basic black wallpaper (with no image) got replaced with a basic black wallpaper with no image.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  38. Another push to get people using Vista by Shamenaught · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My theory: This isn't actually an effort to get more people buying windows directly, but to maintain market dominance. M$ are squeezing the illegal XP 'market', trying to get them to use illegal Vista instead.

    This is merely the first step, they'll eventually add checks for the most common cracks, followed by kill switches. This comes after service pack 1 removed the kill switch from Vista, making it less risky to pirate.

    Whilst this might see a few people jumping ship to Linux or something, I'm guessing M$ decided the risks of losing a few freeloaers outweighed the importance of removing the XP-shaped-thorn from their side.

    Get everyone doin' the downgrade, that way people will be used to it for when windows 7 comes out. M$ have learnt their lesson, and won't be creating any more good operating systems any time soon. It's less profitable!

    --
    mysql> SELECT * FROM `places` WHERE `place` LIKE 'home`; Empty set (0.00 sec)
  39. Black? Seriously? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, that'll turn the h4xx04z away. Want to really make it worthwhile? Force a pink-on-pink color scheme, license the theme song to "My Little Pony", and play that in an uninterruptable background loop on all available sound devices. That'll do a lot more to keep a kid honest than would making his desktop look 1337.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  40. I set my background to black anyway... by ForestGrump · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've long set my background to black. I'm glad to see that the rest of the pirating world is conforming to my standard.

    Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  41. A Transparent Attempt by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    This is nothing more than a blatantly transparent attempt to force people to upgrade to Windows Vista by making XP as unpalatable as possible. The same thing has been done all the way back to Microsoft Office 2000 which has a WGA of its own despite being several versions out of date now. Mcirosoft does its best to try and prevent you from moving your legal copy of Office 2K to your new machine instead of buying a whole new version.

    The problem is that Microsoft can't even compete successfully with itself and retroactively makes previous versions of its O/S and Office products more and more miserable to use with every passing year. Someone should be in jail for touting that Windows Genuine Advantage is actually a good thing for the customer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:A Transparent Attempt by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Too bad Vista does exactly the same thing.

      What they want is for people to stop pirating their products.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    2. Re:A Transparent Attempt by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... Too bad what they're doing will just encourage MORE of it, a shift to Linux or MacOS, or both.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:A Transparent Attempt by sreid · · Score: 1

      or windows 98

    4. Re:A Transparent Attempt by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Not if you want to run the latest stuff... Windows98 won't let you play WoW, for example. But MacOS or Linux will in some fashion.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  42. Uh oh by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    All our machines were imaged by one of our investor parent companies. I hope to hell they're legit copies. Just checked, the product key sticker matches the registry so I think I'm good.

    1. Re:Uh oh by mikael · · Score: 1

      The parent company probably has a site licence - our technicians use these to install the standard build on all PC's.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  43. The GNU Desktop Virus: +1, Challenging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should be the Microsoft Windows de-installer.

  44. Windows Genuine Annoyance by Morgaine · · Score: 3, Informative

    This latest feature is just one more reason for people to run pirate copies, with that particular "Advantage" disabled.

    Microsoft really doesn't get it. The only way to make people buy your software is to make it useful and friendly, not by making it annoying.

    This is just a small part of Microsoft's huge misconception about operating systems. No Microsoft, people don't buy operating systems to benefit you, nor to benefit third parties like content providers. People buy operating systems to benefit THEMSELVES.

    Such a simple concept, but apparently incomprehensible to Microsoft.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  45. windows genuine advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what is the advantage part of this stuff?

  46. Sweet! by gillbates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Relative: Why does my computer lose my wallpaper and give me a black screen every hour?

    Me: Ah, that's just Vista for you. You have to pay Microsoft to get rid of that.

    Relative: Why? Why should I have to pay Microsoft? Why doesn't it just work?

    Me: A.) It's not Linux, so it won't "just work" no matter what you do, and B.) You didn't really expect Microsoft to let you use their computer for free, did you?

    Relative: Um, I already paid for it-

    Me: Yes, you paid for the computer. But you didn't pay Microsoft. You have to pay Microsoft before you can use it. You own the computer, they own the software.

    Relative: So wait - you have to pay for both the computer and Microsoft?

    Me: No, I use Linux. I only have to pay for the computer.

    Relative: But if I paid Microsoft, I'd own both the computer, and the software, right?

    Me: No, you would own just the computer. Microsoft would still own the software.

    Relative: But I could move the software to a new computer if I bought the software, right?

    Me: No, that's not how Microsoft works. You pay them, and you get to use the software on that computer. They still own it - you don't - and you can't move it from computer to computer.

    Relative: So let me get this straight: I pay Microsoft for software, and they still own it?! What kind of $&*!@ is that?

    Me: Yep, that's how proprietary software works. You get to use it, but you can't own it.

    Relative: So how is it that you don't have to pay Microsoft?

    Me: I run Linux.

    At this point, it starts to sink in that pirating Windows isn't doing them any favors. As far as I'm concerned, if you want to use proprietary software, you can pay for it.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Sweet! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me: A.) It's not Linux, so it won't "just work" no matter what you do...

      Linux. It Just Works.
      (Your experience may vary.)

      Me: No, that's not how Microsoft works. You pay them, and you get to use the software on that computer. They still own it - you don't...

      That's not an artefact of proprietary software, it's basic copyright. I can download Ubuntu, but I do not own Ubuntu. I have a single copy, or as many duplicates as I want. I can't just do what I like with it though (eg change the branding and sell it as my own work sans source code) - there are rules for redistribution and all that. Nearly all software has some rules you must follow. F/OSS is not above this.

      And you can move Windows to other PCs. I've done it. It might require a call to the Windows Activation team, but it's not hard. You can't have it on two at the same time though, but you can shift it.

      I'm not a Windows user, except in the office. I'm a fan of Linux, even though I've never managed to really get it working right. I don't think you should misinform people about what proprietary software is or isn't though - only honest, accurate information is worth using to change people's minds about F/OSS.

    2. Re:Sweet! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Linux. It Just Works.
      (Your experience may vary.)

      Seconded. Whether "it just works" depends greatly on which distribution you choose, and what hardware you happen to have. You're more likely to get something that works if you choose Ubuntu (because Canonical has been making sure they include drivers for the most common hardware), but I've had Ubuntu CDs refuse to start before on relatively common hardware. If you turn someone on to Linux, you'd better make sure you offer to help them through it until they're up and running smoothly. Otherwise you will definitely be turning them away from it. Just my two cents.

    3. Re:Sweet! by Karellen · · Score: 1

      "That's not an artefact of proprietary software, it's basic copyright. I can download Ubuntu, but I do not own Ubuntu."

      You own that copy of Ubuntu, same as you own books that you buy.

      Owning a copy of a copyrighted work is different from owning the copyright to a copyrighted work. You can own copies of works copyrighted by other people. You can own a copy of "Harry Potter". You can own copies of Ubuntu.

      Theoretically, you should be able to own copies of Windows as well. However, Microsoft insists that you do not own copies of Windows, rather that you license them from Microsoft, and are therefore bound by the license agreement (EULA) which is much more restrictive than copyright would allow. For example, license agreements typically prohibit you from studying (reverse-engineering) your copy in any detail, which copyright has no domain over. You are allowed to calculate character and word frequencies in a book you own. You are allowed to calculate a reading age for the book and the number of pages to get an idea of how long it will take to read (equivalent of benchmarking?). And, you are allowed to re-sell a book that you own, provided you do not keep any private copies of the work you may have made for your own convenience (e.g. blow-up photocopies for studying the typeface used), and the author or publisher has no say in the matter at all.

      Note that these user license agreements are different from the GPL and other Free Software licenses. The GPL does not impose any restrictions at all on what you can do with your copy of the software. All the things you can do with a book you own, you can do with a copy of some Free Software that you own. You can inspect it, run it, benchmark it, add bits to it, remove bits from it, etc...

      Rather, the main thing that the GPL does is allow you to make and distribute further copies of the work (something otherwise prohibited by copyright) provided you follow certain rules. Which includes, as you point out, not selling it as your own work sans source code.

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    4. Re:Sweet! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      The GPL does not impose any restrictions at all on what you can do with your copy of the software.

      the main thing that the GPL does is allow you to make and distribute further copies of the work ... provided you follow certain rules. Which includes, as you point out, not selling it as your own work sans source code.

      The GPL definitely limits what you can do with your software, and you've outlined this at the end of your post.

      I'm not saying it's a bad thing (I see it as a nett good thing) but we have to remember that all licences come with limitations and whether they are licences to use or licences to distribute, the limitations are real.

      The licence you agree to when you install Windows or OS X is restrictive, but so is the licence you agree to when you install Linux. It's just that we value the Linux licence more as it seems less limiting to us.

    5. Re:Sweet! by Karellen · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....I didn't quite get the distinction across that I meant to. Distributing copies to other people does not affect your copies of the software. When you distribute to other people, those copies are someone else's copies of the software.

      This is what copyright law regulates, the creation and distribution of copies. If the copies of the software remain yours, you can do whatever you want to them.

      It is when you try to do something normally prohibited by copyright - create new copies and distribute them to someone else - that the GPL starts to apply. Clause 9 of the GPL3 (clause 5 of the GPL2) explains this quite well.

      (Although, looking at it those clauses now, it does appear to prevent you from modifying private copies. This is odd, as copyright does not prevent you from modifying personal copies of other copyrighted works - you are allowed to tear pages out of a book, or deface artwork that you own. Odd. I'd never noticed that before.)

      Is that clearer?

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    6. Re:Sweet! by CCW · · Score: 1

      The GPL definitely limits what you can do with your software, and you've outlined this at the end of your post.

      No, it doesn't. You have misread the OP. You can do anything at all you want with it while it is in your possession.
      Alter, reverse engineer, run on 1000 or 1 machine. Burn it and dance naked around the fire.

      There is no license involved with your possession or use of GPL software. There is no license to agree to when you install Linux. The GPL is not a use license.

      You need explicit permission from the copyright holder due to federal copyright law to make COPIES of a copyrighted work, and the GPL grants permission with some restrictions applied. But what you do with your copy (singular) of the software is utterly unrestricted. This is an important distinction. In particular you are free to alter it and hoard your changes. (GPL3 does have some impact on this with respect to hosted services)

  47. I don't know about "mere mortals" but ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    after a few sixpacks my thirty years in the software business just goes away, and for some unaccountable reason people start calling me "Joe".

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:I don't know about "mere mortals" but ... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      You are just doing a very good job of keeping yourself within the Ballmer Peak. (link should not be necessary)

    2. Re:I don't know about "mere mortals" but ... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      So that's *you*!

      Tell me, do you install Windows? What do you think of OS X? Or those ads? And could you handle day to day Linux use?

      Finally, all those quotes about what you do, or how much you know can be substantiated!

  48. Just pleasing their customers by ichbineinneuben · · Score: 1

    On the MSDN WGA blog, MS writes "Our research has clearly shown that customers value the ability of Windows to alert them when they may have software that is not genuine..." Wouldn't you like to review that "research"?

    1. Re:Just pleasing their customers by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, suppose two people contact MS about the new background / [dys]functionality.

      User #1 is worried, because they bought their computer from $NONAME_DISTRIBUTOR and they're concerned that the copy of Windows might be pirated. Microsoft sells them a genuine copy, sues the manufacturer, and scratches a little mark in the "win" column.

      User #2 is pissed off because their pirated copy of Windows started doing stupid shit and they don't like it. They want it to work like it did before. The Microsoft support tech laughs, hangs up, and scratches another mark in the "win" column.

      Result: 100% of their customers were pleased with the new "feature".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  49. Can you bypass using WGA at all? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    I'm not that familiar with windows. Can you do the updates on XP without having WGA installed? I so, how? Any links on a guide?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      google mublinder.

    2. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to run windows update without IE:

      http://windizupdate.com/

      I suppose you could use it to update without installing WGA.

    3. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by gdog05 · · Score: 1

      easy. Using Firefox go to http://windizupdate.com/ . No IE, no WGA, no bad updates. It's the only way to update.

    4. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doesn't update all optional packs and updates, though, and doesn't host patches that require validation. (Which is a good thing, but it's still very limited.)

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by nabsltd · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can always run your own WSUS server.

      This lets you control exactly what does and does not get installed, and WGA isn't even available through WSUS (although Office Genuine Advantage is). If you have more than two computers running Windows 2000 or later, WSUS is a big help for saving bandwidth and assuring you get patched up-to-date quickly.

      Unfortunately, it requires Windows 2003 Server to run, but it is completely free (as in beer).

    6. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by g4b · · Score: 1

      in WinXP yesterday i checked, that Microsoft released a Firefox Plugin for WGA and Windows Update. So now I can use Windows Update in Firefox, too.

      However I still only use it as a gaming and development testing box, so in the end, I dont care.

    7. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unfortunately, it requires Windows 2003 Server to run, but it is completely free (as in beer)."

      The cost of the license covers those little extras, no doubt. So you paid for it.

    8. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um....I hate to break the news to you,but if you would have read the news section at Windiz after nobody came forward when they requested help coding the site they quit updating it. So the newest patch there is from 2006. Doesn't really help when the latest bug strikes. There used to be a site with a batch file which downloaded Windows Updates,but I'm afraid I no longer have the link. But going to Windiz is pretty much a waste of time and I don't know why the site is still up.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      http://www.heise.de/ct/projekte/offlineupdate/download_uk.shtml There's an English version of the site somewhere in there, but I don't have the time to find it at this moment. It's the same batch file though.

    10. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I knew that it was a German site,but I haven't needed to use it in years. My customers actually prefer me NOT to add the Windows updates. Most are professionals,graphic artists,office workers,etc and I have found that Windows updates always seem to break something and it is a royal PITA to try to track down which of the 200+ updates is the one that broke the app they require to work. So now I use either Driveimage XML or Ranish Partition Manager depending on whether they have a spare drive for the clone process or not,and simply restore from image if something goes wrong.

      I wasn't able to find the English version anywhere on site,but I did manage to run it through Google Translate and the link for that is here. So for anyone requiring Windows updates I would suggest using the batch file to make a slipstreamed ISO so the next time Windows bones you won't need as many patches. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by Hucko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/ http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/installation_instructions/ there. Else Google is mining for text characters and will display a whole lot of options in return if you just put some in the little box.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    12. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how do you update your Windows 2003 Server?

    13. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Doing automatic update, download and do not install is enough. It still gets all the updates, even after telling it to never download the WGA one.

      I dont know why MS cares re XP, if they want Vista to be popular, just remove all the WGA/Serials and be done with it. How many more billions do they need to cover their xbox losses?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    14. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Using WSUS.

      WSUS is a service that runs on the Win2K3 machine and notifies you of all updates available that fit broad categories (e.g., "Windows XP", "SQL Server", "Exchange Server"), and you then choose which updates are approved for install on which machines (based on whatever arbitrary criteria you set).

      Then, you configure all your machines to get updates from the WSUS server instead of Windows Update. This includes the machine running WSUS, so there is no way that "genuine advantage" sneaks in.

    15. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Can you do the updates on XP without having WGA installed?

      Yes

      I so, how?

      You can manually download each update directly from Microsoft's site. I do this for my parents machines. They're legitimate machines with licenses but being on dial-up, it would take a while for some of the patches so I d/l the patches from work. I do the same thing for my 2K system.

      Any links on a guide?

      Go to this link, scroll down a bit until you see the dropdown boxes and make your selections. Do the broadest search possible so you see all the updates. Once the list comes back, just download the updates and manually apply them.

      It should be noted there are a few updates every so often which will require you to verify your copy but those are far and few.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    16. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      Yet they still insist that you use Internet Explorer for some things. I tried to install Windows Live Messenger on my daughter's PC last week and it came back with an error saying that the installer requires "Windows Update Agent 5.8.02469"

      What it requires is that you download the Windows Update ActiveX control in IE and install it. You're best exiting when it starts scanning for updates as it then tries to silently foist WGA Notifications on you! Then the installer works fine. I then went into IE and deleted the ActiveX control and Live Messenger works perfectly fine without it.

    17. Re:Can you bypass using WGA at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google for WUA_SearchDownloadInstall.vbs, I think that could help.
      Modification of the vbs by stripping any WGA update should do the trick.

      My 2 cents ...

  50. Malware by changa · · Score: 1

    I wonder when malware will duplicate the look to give them a "Bargain" on a genuine copy of XP.

    "Just give your credit card and for $30 your windows will be legit!"

  51. Re:Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Fo' shiggle, mah niggle!

  52. Obligatory... by ZackZero · · Score: 0

    There's a patch for this whole thing, and it's been out for ages. In some cases it's even easier to use.
    It's called Linux, and it's free. Get it today.

  53. Re:Same on Vista-About That Corporate Edition by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    For people pirating Windows XP, look for the corporate edition so your copy will pass WGA test without cracks.

    Is the Corporate Edition anything different than just a particular corporate license key?

    And where can you display the license key on an existing system? Registry? System Properties?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  54. Funny... by steve.howard · · Score: 1

    My desktop works just fine. Wait, crap...

  55. The downfall continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue next Mac vs PC ad.

  56. Dear MS from a paying customer by sheepofblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a paying customer I don't want to take the time to call you and sit on hold for hours just so I can use what I paid for after your "upgrade" happens by YOUR mistake.

    I get so sick of companies treating me a paying customer as an adversary. Years ago I played games and actually enjoyed them. But when DRM made me into a CD swapping machine despite me having more than enough HD space they lost the fun factor and became a hassle. Now I don't game hardly at all. Of course anyone that illegally subverted the DRM is still gaming including non-paying customers. Seems self defeating.

    Good luck MS though I see this as another reason that Apple and Linux will continue to grow.

    1. Re:Dear MS from a paying customer by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      While I don't know if you'll be on hold for hours (everyone I personally knows states it's only been a few minutes, but experiences can differ), I do agree that the act of having to call them up because of Windows software arbitrarily deciding that you're now a pirate is annoying, to say the very least.

      I wish all software companies would realize that pirates have already found their way around their methods. In the end, all you do is punish the legitimate consumer. You *may* hinder a few pirates, but at what cost? Is it the expected ROI for such crappy decisions worth it?

  57. Authorized fix for the black screen problem by omz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get it here

  58. Interestingly enough... by sm284614 · · Score: 0

    My desktop background has pretty much ALWAYS been a black background. I suggest changing it to a picture of Balmer with a mean look on his face.

  59. Please help by fishthegeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm trying to figure out what all the fuss is about but I can't find this WGA thing. Does anyone know what repository it's in?

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:Please help by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      FYI, WGA doesn't stand for "Windows GPL Alternative".

      Yet.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Please help by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out what all the fuss is about but I can't find this WGA thing. Does anyone know what repository it's in?

      http://www.linuxgenuineadvantage.org/

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Please help by linhares · · Score: 1

      we should build some process that sends your linux distro to the wga server, just to make absolutely sure you're not running windows. That would make a great project.

  60. Gee, none of us saw that coming by smchris · · Score: 1

    I know a guy who probably never bought a copy of Windows in his life, and he has been telling me how wonderfully superior Windows is to linux and other OSes for about the last decade. He updates, so I can hardly wait for his email.

  61. MS is trying to stop pirating of... by albinobluerhino · · Score: 1

    ...an OS they're trying to kill?

  62. Star Wars Reference by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Funny

    The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers.

    It was a tossup between that quote and "Governor Tarkin, I should have expected to find you holding Vader's leash. I recognized your foul stench when I was brought on board."

    More of the same. Just let go.

  63. Already have a black screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already use a black screen on all my pirated copies. I always have windows open, why have a picture that I will never see. Black doesn't hurt my eyes in the dark. Nothing would change for me.

  64. WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by greysunrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's too bad that WGA never recognizes genuine copies of Windows given to students at my university. I think it is due to the fact that the disks are produced on campus under a distribution license, or, The Pirate Bay is hosted inside the dark cave on campus. Just a thought.

    1. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by spire3661 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a VLK XP key from college in 2001 that i still use to this day, ive literally installed it hundreds of times ( on my own machines). I have used the key so many times i have it memorized.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 5, Funny

      FCKGW...?

    3. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know... funny you mention that key. I used to work for Gateway. We found it funny, and insulting, when the free XP CD's that microsoft gave us for completing their training had a cd key that started with those 5 characters... FCKGW... FCK GW? What the hell! Were they trying to subtly insult us?

    4. Re:WGA never works for my genuine copies anyways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oooh! that sounds like mine yes. ktnxbai

  65. It's like, how much more black could this be? by irae · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the answer is none. None more black.

    1. Re:It's like, how much more black could this be? by laejoh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd mod your comment all the way up to six if I could!

      Nigel Tufnel: The numbers all go to 6. Look, right across the board, 6, 6 and...

      Marty DiBergi: Oh, I see. And most slashdot comments go up to 5?

      Nigel Tufnel: Exactly.

      Marty DiBergi: Does that mean it's funnier? Is it any funnier?

      Nigel Tufnel: Well, it's one funnier, isn't it? It's not 5. You see, most blokes, you know, will be modding at 5. You're on 5 here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on 5 on your original posting. Where can you go from there? Where?

      Marty DiBergi: I don't know.

      Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?

      Marty DiBergi: Put it up to 6.

      Nigel Tufnel: 6. Exactly. One funnier.

      Marty DiBergi: Why don't you just make 5 funnier and make 5 be the top number and make that a little funnier?

      Nigel Tufnel: [pause] These go to 6.

    2. Re:It's like, how much more black could this be? by luke923 · · Score: 1

      I think, like you're, like rationalizing this whole thing like into something you did on on purpose. I think we're stuck with a very, very stupid and a very, very dismal looking desktop. This is depressing.

      --
      "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
    3. Re:It's like, how much more black could this be? by multisync · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it would sound better in Dubly.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
  66. So... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    All these moves by MS has made me consider that inadvertently MS is making Windows shareware. And perhaps if things like this could be proven in court Windows might become shareware because clearly this seems to me that MS is offering a "trial version" of XP for people at no cost and you have to pay money to "upgrade" it to the normal version.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  67. Screen should be blue! by wshwe · · Score: 1

    Instead of black the screen should turn in to the blue screen of death.

  68. That's some interesting wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is the "advantage"?

  69. They're altering the deal by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Pray they don't alter it further.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  70. Re:Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, awesome!

  71. Push pirates off XP by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it only me who think that real target are the pirates in 3rd world (China, India) and real goal is to push them to adopt Vista?

    Economy of piracy has its mechanics and M$ exploited it many times. Many developers get first taste of programming on pirated Windows using pirated development software. M$ had rather them pirating Vista.

    All this WGA thing is really nothing, because there are bunch of packs floating on net with XP and Vista stripped of all unnecessary stuff (like license checks). Most active pirates will not be affected by M$' change of WGA by a bit.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Push pirates off XP by shentino · · Score: 1

      Well MS already ruined their opening olympic ceremony with a nice fat BSOD...

    2. Re:Push pirates off XP by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say it MS fault per se. In my experience, most of the time this is unskilled developers who make such bad press for MS. As embedded programmer, I can tell you that most of such problems come from hardware. Windows BSODs, Linux oopses - there is not much difference. If the developers were not morons: (1) watchdog timer would have being configured properly rebooting system within seconds after OS crash; (2) in particular Windows can reboot instead of flashing the BSOD.

      Yes, Windows quality sucks, but in such applications most of the crashes happen due to H/W problems. You do not see much of Linux flops because the developers on average know better how to build system which should run 24/7. Windows developers on other side, often deliver literally snapshot of development system with all bells and whistles activated. That's why we are seeing such BSODs.

      Though, to the topic, most embarrassing flop I have seen was a row of new laptops on demo stand behind glass. They should have been running some fancy demo, but instead all like one had the WGA pop up on screen telling that "the XP might be not genuine." Demo was still running in the background, but not full screen, so you didn't see it at first. And this was in retail shop with literally "just unboxed" hardware all having proper OEM licenses.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  72. Re:Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call this guy a troll or a flamer, I don't care. He brings up a valid and funny point. An Asian accent trying to pronounce "niggle" will most definitely sound like "nigger". The guy with a few posts above me got it right....

  73. Linux? by sandysnowbeard · · Score: 1

    Maybe I missed something, but isn't this just more reason for people to switch to linux?

    1. Re:Linux? by sreid · · Score: 1

      or windows 95

    2. Re:Linux? by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      As much as I like Linux, it isn't for everyone. Until more software can be used out of the box, Linux isn't going to grow by the amounts that many here wish for it. Yeah, yeah, I know, there are programs like WINE that allow you to run Windows programs. But until my dad can turn on a computer running Linux, install a game, and play the game without having to put much thought into things such as 'Am I screwing anything important up?', Linux isn't user friendly enough for the average computer user.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    3. Re:Linux? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....Maybe I missed something, but isn't this just more reason for people to switch to linux....

      or they find out that in order to run VISTA the have to buy a new computer and mostly new software for it anyway. That's when they whip out their credit card and buy a Mac. That puts an end to activation, WGA, spyware, viruses, spending money on performance robbing anti-malware software. That way they get a working computer with no driver or other hardware hassles. It connects to a wireless network and most modern printers out of the box. Most people buy a computer in order get work done of even just have fun.

      Reinstalling and re-activating software on a computer by calling someone in India, spending time on hold and finally getting a drone who can barely speak English, is not what most people, other than some here on /., consider either productive or fun.

      If they are geeky /. type, they can learn the innards of OSX and muck around in the UNIX underpinnings via terminal. They can even install Linux in a VM and fool around with that as well. I did that with UBUNTU and after some mucking around, was finally able to get firefox to connect to the Internet in order to get updates. I doubt though, that my sister would have gotten UBUNTU working without my help.

      Even XP runs pretty well in a VM on a modern Mac. It actually installed without a hitch and connected to the net automatically. The virtual HD files can even be on an external USB or firewire drive.

      --
      All theory is gray
  74. Microsoft needs a new plan.... by houbou · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe that Microsoft's strategy when it comes to OS need some serious revamp, else, in the next 5 to 10 yrs, they will lose their predominance in the field.

    Now, they may not WANT to hear this, but WE don't want Vista, that's simple enough!

    It's a resource hog, and it doesn't deliver anything useful.

    For Microsoft to stay in the OS game, I think they should do the following:

    • Create one OS that works, don't have anymore flavours to it, just ONE desktop based OS regardless of what you do. (no home, basic, business, etc.. kinds).
    • Make it free to all!
    • Sell customer support instead, those who have it for free, a generic website and be on your own.
    • Have free and slow servers for updates, but faster servers for those who pay for the customer support!

    Does this make sense? I think it does, no more reason for piracy! And the best of all is that they probably will increase their bottom line with this strategy! :)

    1. Re:Microsoft needs a new plan.... by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      For Microsoft to stay in the OS game, I think they should do the following:

      * Create one OS that works, don't have anymore flavours to it, just ONE desktop based OS regardless of what you do. (no home, basic, business, etc.. kinds).

      * Make it free to all!

      * Sell customer support instead, those who have it for free, a generic website and be on your own.

      * Have free and slow servers for updates, but faster servers for those who pay for the customer support!

      they should make a *nix distro?

  75. to be fair by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    the summary does warn that they would be "uncomfortable niggles."

    1. Re:to be fair by sreid · · Score: 2, Informative

      niggle, new word for me...

  76. Re:Same on Vista-About That Corporate Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can use a piece of software that shows it to you (it also shows the keys for Office).
    http://magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder/

  77. Free your Linux box! by vimm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Were you a victim of Linux Genuine Advantage scheme to make millions? Linux Genuine Advantage Crack will restore free as in speech rights to what should have been in the first place. Down with the man!

  78. links to the fix by robo_mojo · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:links to the fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Another, arguably even simpler, option: http://goodbye-microsoft.com

    2. Re:links to the fix by catmistake · · Score: 1
    3. Re:links to the fix by weicco · · Score: 1

      Link to the actual fix, not just some clever bullshit:

      Find a retailer

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    4. Re:links to the fix by weicco · · Score: 1

      Ooops. Sorry. My copypaste is broken. Here's the link.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    5. Re:links to the fix by lzdt · · Score: 1

      Correction to the list order: 1. gentoo 2. debian 3. netbsd ... And yes, my list is the only right one you cloud!

  79. Re: paid for windows vista ultimate by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    I didn't start laughing, I was in shock! But the second part of your story was very funny. I guess that's why they called it the ultimate edition - it might be the last one that anyone takes seriously.

  80. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good ol OEM discs for the win, multiple machines, multiple homes, one disc, one key, no issues, windows updates on or not, the machines have never come up with anything stating 'your copy of windows is not genuine'. Now my legit paid for copy of Vista on my gaming rig... I'm afraid to even put more ram in the bastard for fear windows decides it wants me to go through calling up MS to get things sorted.

  81. Was that in the EULA? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I don't think I agreed to harassment when I installed XP.

    It's definitely not in the EULA and most likely a violation of the CFAA.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:Was that in the EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong:

      * Mandatory Activation. The license rights granted under this EULA are limited to the first thirty (30) days after you first install the Product unless you supply information required to activate your licensed copy in the manner described during the setup sequence of the Product. You can activate the Product through the use of the Internet or telephone; toll charges may apply. You may also need to reactivate the Product if you modify your computer hardware or alter the Product. There are technological measures in this Product that are designed to prevent unlicensed or illegal use of the Product. You agree that we may use those measures.

      (Emphasis mine)

      Sounds like you agreed to anything Microsoft wants to do, including harassment. Just another reason you shouldn't be using an OS that assumes everyone is a criminal by default.

    2. Re:Was that in the EULA? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      I don't think my copy came with that EULA! My copy didn't require activation, which was my original point.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    3. Re:Was that in the EULA? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Where did you get your copy? Dell OEM pre-installed copies ask you to agree to the EULA (which is displayed on-screen) on first boot-up. Retail copies come with the EULA bundled in the box (IIRC). Volume Licenses come bundled with the EULA. Academic copies (MSDNAA, anyone?) make you agree to the EULA in order to download the ISO. Did I forget anything? The only place you could get XP that I can think of that wouldn't have the EULA is a pirated copy. I think you've implied you don't have a pirated copy; if you do, then your point is invalid.

    4. Re:Was that in the EULA? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      see, now you're just ignorant. VLK copies of windows XP do not require activation. There are legitimate VLK copies of windows XP.

      You're just ignoring that.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    5. Re:Was that in the EULA? by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Volume Licenses don't require activation through Microsoft's servers, no. They do, however, have an EULA attached to them. I never said they required activation, nor did I say volume licenses aren't legitimate. I use VLKs practically every day here at work.

      Activation is a completely separate issue from the EULA.

      It really wasn't necessary to call me ignorant, especially when you just completely missed my point, which was this: just because YOU don't have the EULA doesn't mean the license you're using didn't come with an EULA bundled with it. (You're stealing a VLK from work or school, I take it?)

  82. Theory vs. Practice by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    In theory:

    *wallpaper changes to black*
    User: "Oh gosh, I didn't know I had a pirated version of XP. I'll go down to the store and get a legit copy. Phew, thanks Microsoft, you warned me before I did something illegal there, that could have been ugly.".


    In practice:

    *wallpaper changes to black*
    User: "Oh FFS! **** you, Microsoft!"

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    1. Re:Theory vs. Practice by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side, their next trick will hopefully be to add a skull and crossbones to that "scary" black background... NOW you're talking!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  83. lol by SendBot · · Score: 1

    My windows desktop background is set to black already. It's the best thing to look at when I don't want the second monitor to distract me.

  84. script to put back wallpaper.... by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    'or one of many many possible ways to defeat wga crap
    Set oShell = CreateObject("WScript.Shell") Set oSHApp = CreateObject("Shell.Application")
    Do Until oShell.AppActivate ("Display Properties")
    Set oSHApp = CreateObject("Shell.Application") 'apply bitmap with a delta of the transparent watermark
    sWallPaper = "filepath\filename"
    oShell.RegWrite "HKCU\Control Panel\Desktop
    \Wallpaper", sWallPaper
    wscript.sleep 5000 'lets do this at 5 sec intervals
    Loop

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  85. Black background to keep watermark visible? by impus · · Score: 1

    Otherwise it would be possible to hide it with a screenshot and some wallpaper shoppery.

  86. Stuff by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • I wonder if this would affect my pirated copy of windows which basically runs inside a virtual machine that gives it no internet access whatsoever (too much responsibility for windows) ...
    • Nevermind the black background, that water mark seems more annoying, what is not specified in the article is whether this watermark will be visible even when there is a maximized window.
    • My brother is a windows user, however when MSN decided not to work unless you upgrade it, and that stuff could require WGA, he just... switched to pidgin, I wonder if MS is underestimating users, they may not be switching to Linux, but they will slowly simply stop using their stuff. If they make IE8 require WGA, that just means more firefox/safari/opera users, WGA is slowly affecting their market share, I personally hope they only notice this when it is too late.
    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  87. What if you have a black desktop anyhow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have my desktop set black by default, as (a) it maximises contrast with icons placed on it and (b) looks really cool. So it seems to me like WGA might indeed provide a genuine advantage in this case.

  88. Re:Vista Failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been selling Vista just fine the last two years. As opposed to say, Linux?

  89. Right move ... not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problems related to windows bug triggering WPA authentication, cuntless.

    Problems related to properly pirated windows, 0.

  90. Collateral damage by Mawbid · · Score: 1

    I like my desktop black. So... now people who see my desktop are going to think I have an illegitimate copy of XP? That sucks. It's the first time in years I'm running legit Windows :)

    --
    Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  91. slight improvement by speedtux · · Score: 1

    Free Windows and a better desktop background than that ugly default, I like it already...

  92. Figures... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Windows is pants

    --
    That is all.
  93. Pirates use WGA??? by guidryp · · Score: 1

    It only seems like they will get the very naive pirates with this.

  94. RemoveWGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I choose to not allow WGA to install itself, however a family member recently accidently installed this update, and upon reboot was horrified to find a new login screen and desktop. They thought it was a virus!
    I took a look at the processes running, and found WGATray, which upon killing, restarts itself within seconds. It was the only windows update in add/remove programs that couldn't be uninstalled. This stuff is as bad as spyware/malware.

    If you want to get rid of it, find a copy of RemoveWGA.exe on google, this thing works wonders. I ran it, rebooted, and WGA was well gone.

  95. The Chinese Space Program by Beechmere2000 · · Score: 1

    The People's Spacecraft: "Mission Control, we are now coming up to re-entry interface, on my mark. . . ." Mission Control: "Ahh, cancel that Spacecraft, and let's do a one orbit go-around - we need to refresh our desktop wallpaper here. Call back in 90 minutes please..."

  96. Razorsharpmonkey by wackarnolds · · Score: 1

    Anybody having this problem needs to download the VLK version it will never show as pirated because the true VLK version is made to be installed over and over and over from one key!! GOOD LUCK ALL YOU WINDOWS SUCKERS!!

  97. Re:Black? Niggles? by sbenson · · Score: 0

    I'm making that my Gnome background.

  98. Black screen - OMG by dindi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that is copy protection. Guess what, my default screen is black. Even though OSX does not allow it, I just set a black gif (10x10 pixels) as the BG image.

    I know, many of you like (just as me scuba pictures, cars, babes, bikes, nersy images, superheroes) but at the end I WANT TO SEE MY DAM ICONS, so the best is a black background.

    OK, Working as a programmer in the sportsbetting industry today (kickoff day) is a bit stressy, and after coding 12 hours at my (8 hour a day) consulting job pretty much kicked my arse, and I drank some rum from the Dominican Repubic ( ie I am kinda drunk).....

    Anyway, black BG is best, that is the ultimate oldscshool, and working in the *NIX environment this is the best you can set.

    So does MS expect to scare people with this mean black BG ?

    1. Re:Black screen - OMG by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      This is not so relevant, but a 10x10 pixel image might have a tiny performance hit compared to a 8x8 or 16x16 image. Software and hardware deals fine with non-power-of-two image dimensions, but never as fast as the alternative.

    2. Re:Black screen - OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does MS expect to scare people with this mean black BG ?

      Yes i want my virtual nude whenever possible, only sometimes such ugly window needs to hide it. Custom background is an essential part of the OS, actually, it doesnt' need to do anything else.

      On-topic. So far for the automatic updates. Or reinstall my legal windows 2000. Dunnow what is worse, in the sense of: more vulnerable for attacks.

  99. I like a B+W Moire patterned desktop by crovira · · Score: 1

    It makes me ill (like ballistic barfing ill ;-p) after a couple of hours and I have to go and take a lie down. :-)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  100. Re:Same on Vista-About That Corporate Edition by jcgf · · Score: 1

    And where can you display the license key on an existing system? Registry? System Properties?

    Google for "belarc advisor" - it's a utility that inventories your system and is able to obtain the key of windows, office, etc. Just download and run the exe file, it will take about a minute and will display a webpage (just a local temp file) in your default browser with everything you wanted to know about your computer (in this case your key, but it tells you about your hardware specs and all the other software you have too).

    I'm sure you can find a more "hardcore regedit" way of doing it, but I'm lazy.

  101. Re:Black? Niggles? by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if so many weren't too niggardly to purchase a legit copy of Windows, this wouldn't be a problem!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  102. Warning: twitter sockpuppet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  103. No - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just need to stop using Windows.

    It couldn't be plainer.

  104. The most valuable item... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from following that link, was the advertisement on the right hand side of their website pointing to hornymatches.com .

  105. Definitely been happening for a while by adrizk · · Score: 1

    I've been seeing some of those WGA 'niggles' for a while: Intermittent blue screens, the system is way slower than it should be given my hardware (and getting slower all the time), my start button has been replaced with this godawful green colored thing..

    Wait - what?

  106. Perhaps you would like to try the hot dog stand by tknd · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Perhaps you would like to try the hot dog stand by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but I knew someone who did even worse all by themselves back in the Windows 3X days.. Imagine fluorescent green and bright purple. And she was an artist. My revenge was taking a screen cap of her desktop to set as wallpaper and minimising the program manager... Took her ages to figure out what had happened.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  107. box? Button by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually to some extent this depends on which window manager you're running, as they stick buttons in different places by default.

    In most cases though, it's probably going to be gnome/kde, although I think that there are some slimline versions of ubuntu that use XFCE or others.

  108. Sales? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Platforms other than XP? Easy, they're selling them (Vista).

  109. Too late... by DaFallus · · Score: 1
    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  110. well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't imagine many pirates of xp are stupid enough to download anything beyond SP2.

  111. Wine by phorm · · Score: 1

    Maybe you can run it under Wine, or perhaps a VM? :-)

  112. It could be more annoying. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think about it. Microsoft could have did stuff like this. Thankfully, they didn't.

    Change the homepage to Microsoft's website, perhaps a page about Windows XP and piracy.

    Have Clippit pop up in the corner of Windows XP, saying, "It looks like you're using a pirated copy of Windows. Would you like to purchase one now?"

    Slow one's Internet connection to 56kbps speed, except when doing Windows Updates.

    Disable any and all video capabilities.

    Limit the display to 800 x 600 at 8-bit colour.

    Disable accessing certain file types, such as video files, music files, etc. (Jokingly, because if you pirate Windows, you might be pirating other things as well.)

    1. Re:It could be more annoying. by zoward · · Score: 1

      Think about it. Microsoft could have did stuff like this. Thankfully, they didn't

      ...

      Sure, and when the occasional legitimate user who has somehow who has somehow tripped up WGA (happens all the time) and has to suffer these limitations, Microsoft would not only have to deal with a massive PR backlash, they might even be subject to a class action suit.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    2. Re:It could be more annoying. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      My original post was meant to be on the humourous side anyways. It would definitely be a PR disaster.

      I just thought of another. "Disabled mouse. Keyboard only."

  113. Ithouht that that kind of EULA didn't hold up in C by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    Court? Yeah, so I want to upgrade my HD in my Thinkpad, so I have to image and reinstall. Then say I want to put in more RAM, later, I want a faster wifi card. Oh, wait, XP is now an invalid copy? At that point the user has an ethical basis for hacking it. Though if Ubuntu supported cisco wifi cards and Lenovo put big enough HDs and fast enough wifi in these things, that problem could be avoided.

  114. BlueScreen screen saver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should just download and make BlueScreen the default screen saver.

    1. Re:BlueScreen screen saver by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yup, but make an exception rule in your virus scanner. It probably detects BlueScreen as a "joke/prank".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  115. Re:Black? Seriously? by ff1324 · · Score: 1

    You think that will embarrass users? You obviously do not have any female offspring under the age of 10. You have perfectly described my daughter's computer. But it's that Hannah Montana crapola...

  116. I don't miss companies nagging me to go legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Linux for a good many years now. Not long after Windows ME came out I chose to switch to it as my main operating system. I admit I have tried XP Professional and Vista Home Premium and this is one of many reasons I don't use it, and don't recommend it. My girlfriend finds Linux to be easier, my mother, my sister, my father, my friends, my five year old niece all find Linux to be easier. I don't have to prove I have a valid copy of my operating system, I don't get treated like I am a pirate if some validation software makes a mistake. I don't have to answer to a company to use a fully functioning operating system. I don't get nagged, hassled, annoyed, pestered, poked, prodded, or just plain messed with by any software making business. I don't deal with my background being changed, or watermark on my desktop, or a 30 day period I can use software before being deactivated, I also don't have to register my copy, or activate it. I don't have problems with updates to my system that might make a mistake and decide that my copy isn't genuine software (not that this update will do that but I don't like running the risk). For that matter I don't have to worry about my software not being genuine. I am 100% legal and I can do just about anything I want. I will remain 100% legal and genuine by not using Microsoft products. One day you may win me back, but so far I cannot even see that with a very big telescope even remotely peaking up over the horizon. Don't get me wrong, I don't hate Windows, I just see it as less usable and harder unless it is all you have used all your life, and this has the potential to add to that mess. Thank you Microsoft for not nagging me, but I guess you can't. :)

  117. Re:Black? Seriously? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    My daughters are 8 and 5. As far as I know, they have not yet installed pirated copies of XP.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  118. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that M$ finally do something against pirates.

    Linux will just get a great Push from it. imagine 3 billion annoyed windows user in India and china cant see they cute Hellokitty Wallpapers anymore.

    Chinese get usally 200 Dollar per month. So they will do everything but NOT buy windows. (anyway u cant buy it in china)

    The easyest solution is linux.

  119. Was the original replacement for the wallpaper... by chadbryant · · Score: 1

    ...going to be an image of "a greased, naked woman on all fours with a dog collar around her neck and a leash...and a man's arm holding on to the leash extended out to her shoving a black glove in her face to sniff it"?

  120. The Background by cburley · · Score: 1

    Nofeus: Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know, you can't explain. But you feel it. You've felt it your entire life - that there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad. It is this feeling that's brought you to me. Do you know what I'm talking about?

    Meow: The Background?

    Nofeus: Do you want to know what it is? The Background is everywhere. It is all around us, even now in this very room. You can see it when you look up at the night sky, or when you turn off your computer. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your license fees. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you to the Truth.

    Meow: What Truth?

    Nofeus: That you are a pirated copy, Meow. Like everyone else here on Earth, you were copied illegally. Your DNA has piracy detection code, and, as programmed in the Beginning, it has crippled you and put up a Black Background, which we call Space.

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  121. Parent missing Pictures - can be found here by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    The thumbnails in the article are a little small and only bring up and ad on clicking.

    Actual pictures of the WGA watermark can be found here.

  122. The only reason I have a legal copy of windows.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that I'm a student an purchased both XP Pro x64 and Ultimate x64 for a total of $25, and Office 07 Enterprise for another $10.

    At least 80% of the people smart enough to be able to pirate an OS and install it themselves are intelligent enough to disable WGA. Seems kinda pointless to make a background black. My last 3 have been predominantly black with a small bit of a b&w image so it's not completely boring. Plain black would be a minor annoyance.

  123. Microsoft owe me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. I've got lots of XP computers. I like, only ever use one at a time. My Toshiba ones broken. WTF shouldn't I be able to transfer the licenses? Which is what I do, WITHOUT MICROSOFT'S BLESSING (because I'm sure their drones would just tell me I'm "required" to buy a new one). As far as I'm concerned Gates has made plenty of money out of me already. I'll only buy the same things so many times. And really, if MS ever took me to court, any fair minded judge would throw the case out.

  124. black wallpaper by TechBCEternity · · Score: 1

    So what happens if you use a black wallpaper already? are they going to switch it to homosexual clown pr0n?

  125. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A clearly superior option would be for a script to periodically do a printscreen of the desktop or whatever program is open and then open it up fullscreen in a Wordpad document so that a user who has not seen this take place will find himself clicking on nothing.

    Or any number of hilarious measures.

    Although I suppose their moderation in the punishment is due largely to fear of false positives.

  126. Your problem, If you did not crack it... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    As usual, the only people with problems will be those that did not crack it.

    My WinXP SP3 and my Gentoo+Wine both report that they're genuine Microsoft software. O:-D
    But I rarely use XP nowadays...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  127. To the 'pirates' and related users by Tatsh · · Score: 1

    Since you cannot vote with your wallet, vote with your mouse. Do not download Windows, Office, or anything of the sort. It is only turning into more bloatware and on top of that now it is spying on your copy just to make sure it is legitimate. WGA's first incarnation was 'phoning home' once a day (I think now it's once a week)! Yes, you can crack away at it; someone always figures out a way around any copy prevention measure. But if you stop using pirated Microsoft software, you are getting yourself out of legal danger. Do I agree with the copyright laws much? Not really, no. But why risk?

    If you stop using Microsoft anything, and start using free/open source software alternatives, you are getting yourself out of format lock-in. How many .doc/.docx files do you have? You are nearly stuck if you have a lot.

    You might think cracking or a keygen is cool, and the idea of it is cool, but the effort taken to do either of those could be better spent in developing the free alternative.

    Since a while ago, on Windows (long before I started using Linux fully), I moved to almost all FOSS software. At the time, Gaim (now Pidgin as you all know), OpenOffice, Firefox, Scribus, and a few more. Start small, 'pirates'. Start from Windows. Get rid of your pirated copy of Office and replace it with OpenOffice or something that can read ODF format. Get rid of Photoshop and learn GIMP. Get rid of MS Publisher and use Scribus. Get rid of Outlook and replace it with Thunderbird (either use the Thunderbird Calendar add-on or use Sunbird for calendar). Yes, there is much learning to be done and perhaps 'quirks' to get used to, but it is worth it. Then go ahead and make the switch to a free OS altogether. You'll find all those apps right there, and you'll be able to open up all your files too. Almost no FOSS Windows versions use the registry, so you can transfer all your settings files to Linux too and they will probably work (I had no issue transferring my Firefox profile to Linux when I switched, etc).

    There is a website, MSFN, dedicated to figuring out how to make Windows more automated (cscript, batch files, RunOnce, RunOnceEx, unattended installation, nLite add-ons, etc), but a lot of it is nasty tricks working around Windows' bugs and oddities. I find it odd that such a website would exist, when not only does bash feature a much better set of commands, and for every batch file using for /F, bash's for loop is simple and easy to read and understand. But I guess if people want to literally praise MS then they have their 'stage'. Neowin is also a shrill; when Vista RTM arrived, they had an article and all they could say was 'not as bad as people say' and they were NEVER willing to admit that it sucked. How can one look at the Windows Registry and consider a long Key path like HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Explorer\Main\Toolbar\{3098F-9093A-209BF-5096C-C6902} normal? The registry is clearly made to be complicated to end-users, which is why EVERY single KB article warns about editing the registry. There are indeed some parts of it that can be modified and will forever stop a system from working without a complete reinstall. Ridiculous! How do you call that secure? And remember that on XP, you are administrator by default, any program could secretly call a registry editor (I forget what it is called in the WinAPI) and edit those crucial parts of the registry. If those are protected (as perhaps they should be), since you are administrator, that program could beat that because it could call a permissions command that sets permissions to Allow again, then go ahead and do its dirty trick. Or how about a program that disables SFC and then closes explorer and deletes it? It is too easy to break a Windows system. I know when I'm not root, my /usr folder is almost always safe (yes exploits may get found someday, and have been in the past). My only folder in danger at any given time when I execute is $HOME. That is ACTUAL security. Mac asking for a pa

  128. You dont see the background anyway. by jobst · · Score: 1

    Under normal circumstances and working (having a number of programs/windows open) I do not see the background at all, I see it once a day when I start up the machine ... then the desktop is covered by windows. soooooooooooooooooooooo WHY BOTHER?

    --
    to code or not to code, that is the question.
  129. Too bad... by Nathrael · · Score: 1

    Too bad that most pirates use the corporate edition of WinXP, which comes without the annoying WGA stuff.

    --
    A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  130. Re:Oh wow. Which one, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly why I haven't switched to Linux yet. EIGHT links to the same stuff. How can I choose? Forget it, I'm staying with my Windows.

  131. Here's a way around WGA notifications by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    As the majority of you slashdotters know, it's almost impossible to purchase a PC from Dell, Compaq / HP, etc without getting a CD key stuck on the side of the machine.
    Now Microsoft have us forced on to a proper corp licensing scheme, so we pay some kind of special business key for every machine on the network.
    Every single computer in the office has a Windows sticker on the side of the machine which is NEVER used.

    I tracked down a copy of the Windows XP retail CD (which is surprisingly hard to find, most of us on the internet seem to have 'liberated' the corp)
    I install Windows on my machine(s) my friends machines and my families machines using completely genuine and valid CD keys that Microsoft themselves issued to Dell / HP, the keys are never, ever going to be used - good old double dipping by Microsoft :/

    I've got no doubt I'm bending the rules and in a grey area, however now all my computers / friends / family computers I work on are completely 100% legitimate with genuine copies of Windows, no more WGA problems, no more activation problems etc.

    Quite handy, Microsoft wouldn't be impressed but I'm sure they have bigger fish to fry than me.

    1. Re:Here's a way around WGA notifications by Unoti · · Score: 1

      the keys are never, ever going to be used - good old double dipping by Microsoft :/ I've got no doubt I'm bending the rules and in a grey area, however now all my computers / friends / family computers I work on are completely 100% legitimate with genuine copies of Windows

      You're the one that's "double dipping", not Microsoft. And it's not a "grey" area; it's clear piracy. If you're gonna pirate, at least own up to it on Slashdot. It's not like we really care. But don't kid yourself.

    2. Re:Here's a way around WGA notifications by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Please explain how I'm double dipping, infact what the hell are you talking about, is my post not clear or are you not reading it correctly?
      Microsoft have been paid for TWO windows licenses for each machine we have effectively, one is never, ever used - I'm making use of the sticker on the side of the machine.

  132. Revenge of the WGA by blankoboy · · Score: 1

    This is really it. I am jumping ship the second Apple releases a new version of the Mac Mini (hopefully next month). WGA, when it first arrived, was the slap in the face from Microsoft that did it for me. Why do I, a paying customer, need to be subjected to this treatment? Microsoft acts as though it is a privilege to use their operating system. Well, I've been paying enough money to Microsoft since 3.11 and I no longer like the stink here so I'm moving on. Thanks for the memories Bill and Steve...good luck.

  133. Suggestion: Photoshop for dummies by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    A photo can be [fade out] and still have meaning, [smoothed] for the eyes, news-paper model with [half-toned], grow a tan with [colourise] or be Gomez with [reduce colors], be [pixelated], look through [blind]s, hell, your background could grow [fur] or catch [fire] even! Not all backgrounds have to be that fluo-hey-i'm-here-attitude but could be rather [Chrome] relaxed.
    And still you come with the half-baken excuse you can't see your damn icons?

    These tools exist to make your photogenic/graphic life a lot easier, to make that Tubgirl picture make look no different with an [Inner Bevel] or to hide Goatse behind a nice layer of [Polished Stone] which makes the Grand Canyon go jealous! For those who know these effects, you know which tool (v9 above all!) I'm loving above Photoshop.

    OK!

    I've got to give it to you,
    I like my GUI black too, no sugar, no milk;
    although if you can choose a background to easen your pain of point-and-chuck; you might be able to use a little photoshop for it, mkay?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  134. this happened to me, a illegit user by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    <irony>i pirated windows vista ultimate edition *waits for laughter to die down* and after a few months, i installed some new RAM. i don't know if it was because i changed the RAM, but after that Microsoft decided that my copy of Windows was legit, and didn't put a permanent message in the lower-right corner of my machine telling me as much, and did not refuse to let me use certain features, such as the Aero graphics enhancements. Although I have disabled it because it is slow as hell when you alt-tab out of games.

    personally, i suggest microsoft take a flying leap, and adopt a more "don't charge me 300 euro's for a service pack" attitude (for example, the way OSX does it) before more people get the mind set that piracy is not just about being cheap, but a principel! </irony>

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  135. Oblig by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Every time you operate one of these weird black controls, labelled in black on a black background, a little black light lights up black to let you know you've done it"

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:Oblig by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      We need a +1 Hitchhiker's reference mod

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  136. Black? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    No, they should have used a bright red and blue checkerboard pattern, not only on the desktop but title bars, too.

    The human eye has some red/blue chromatic aberration, making red/blue patterns pretty annoying to the eye.

  137. Good luck with that. by Arimus · · Score: 1

    My default background for my desktop is a black screen...

    So this would affect me how?

    (And how will they do this to my X desktop ;> )

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  138. Emo-Goth Phase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WIndows is just going through an Emo-Goth phase. It's common these days to wear all black when you're an Emo-Goth. Don't worry... I'm sure they'll grow out of it....

  139. Re: Ponies! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    That could be the next internet meme.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTrgh0vELEo

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  140. so if you like your desktop background black ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    ... the airport security dumbasses will confiscate your laptop and claim you are using a pirated version of Windows.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  141. uncheck the WGA update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enable Windows Update service, set to notify me, wait 5 mins, click the popup bubble, uncheck the WGA update from the list of updates :), download/install everything else, disable windows update service. Also works for cracked Vista 32/64 I believe.

  142. Yet another bright idea... by teh.f4ll3n · · Score: 1

    Even though I don't use Vista, I'm pretty damn sure that Genuine Tool thing can be pretty much removed/disabled without hurting the OS. I think MS should provide us with such entertainment every day :D

    --
    Given the choise between Hitler and RIAA/MPAA I'd go for the first one - at least he knew when to shoot himself.
  143. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my wallpaper IS a black screen:)

  144. Re:Black? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, sure...

    http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080710

  145. Whoa! by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    So if I prefer a black background, I can steal Windows without bothering with cracks and workarounds? Pirate Bay, here I come!

  146. Replace Desktop Wallpaper with ubuntu by mAriuZ · · Score: 1

    There was an qemu+linux screensaver for windows

    http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-scrnsave/

    maybe the desktop background should be replaced too
    with an compiz enabled on ...

    --
    developer http://flamerobin.org
  147. Re:Black? Seriously? by luke923 · · Score: 1

    I did that at work before to keep people from looking over my shoulder. Actually, it wasn't "My Little Pony," but a unicorn Word template that I found on Microsoft's site. Also, I had dual monitors so that it became more of an eyesore. Worst case scenario, I got a few laughs out of it.

    --
    "Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two" -- RFC 1925
  148. Black screens?? by namco · · Score: 1

    All they need now is to add is a skull and crossbones and then rename the system to XP: Pirate Edition.

  149. Once again, the Mac makes it easier by heinzkunz · · Score: 1

    Just press control, alt, command, 8 to invert the display colors.

    Warning: Makes some mac users slap their shiny laptops.

    1. Re:Once again, the Mac makes it easier by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for pornography, I'd invert my colors all the time.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Once again, the Mac makes it easier by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Why? What have you got against blue women?

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  150. An improvement by taff^2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this stops my screen going blue every 15 minutes I'll be happy

    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
  151. i was really worried by nimbius · · Score: 1

    for a minute. then i realized i can just pirate a copy of XP and not deal with this crap.

    it still runs all my games, which is really all i use windows for. it also installs faster, boots faster, and runs faster on my dual core. why did we have vista again?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  152. vista experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After i installed vista for the first time i found that my computer crashed alot. It turns out that i had to install a new driver for my SATA controller.
    I installed it and it started working fine. Except that Microsoft decided that the new driver means i moved the harddrive in another computer so in three days i couldn.t boot in windows. Fortunatly the vista license was free, as i got
    it throught the MSDN Academic Alliance program. And mother than that, the people that run tha MSDNAA at my university were stupid enough to put diferent licenses on the CD,DVD and X64 versions, and change them at a point. So now i have 6 linceses for Vista. Doesn't mather because since then i've been using Linux.

  153. hilarious by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

    Turning the screen black; it's usualy the first thing i do (on my registred) XP version
    As all these images only distracts my clear overview of icons.
    I hope this can become a future in any legal version too, to startup with a black screen.

    BTW if Microsoft would realy plug-out the power of those "free" systems.
    How many of them would go to free alternatives like linux ubuntu or others ??.
    I think MS should be happy that those people still use their MS product.
    Especialy since Vista is around, and MS ignores it's XP succes (doesnt listen to its custommers).
    As such people know how to use MS products in corperate environments.
    MS should think of them as students, who also get (almost?) free MS software from schools.
    Those people spread the words Microsoft in the world, call that free marketing; thats free for free.

    Or simply lower it's price as a CD costs almost nothing, and it are only copies. With not that much support.
    If the high price is because of included support costs, then sell two versions one with support, and one without.
    Or... since microsofts dominates ICT; create a free simple version for home usage. For example a version with only FAT32, single user, no sharing options, no mediaplayer, no games, no calculator, no mstc, etc just a free limited down version, like an OS was in the DOS age. But then let the people buy online extensions.

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  154. Always hated the WGA tactic. by DoctorDyna · · Score: 1

    My thought is (and this may have been said before, I only skimmed the comments) is that this, like most Microsoft tactics regarding piracy are sadly only aimed at naive users. Poor folks who can be easily goaded into coughing up a credit card number on the "are you genuine" website, people who actually believe the big green shield in Windows update is the right choice.

    Saavy users have the WGA problem kicked in a matter of minutes, which interestingly is the group least likely to actually succumb to being bullied into buying a new license for Windows.

    --
    Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
  155. What WGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disabled WGA ages ago on my legitimate copy of Win XP, and the rest of my systems are either linux or OS X.

    Now, if they changed the background image to a skull and crossbones, or a nice slideshow of pirate-themed images, that would be cool.

    Changing the background image? The more you tighten your grip, the more systems that slip through your fingers -- and, heck, that's not really much of a grip you've got there, MS.

  156. Blue Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's odd. My screen is blue not black after an hour.

  157. That's ridiculus by n0on3 · · Score: 1

    That's really hypocritical, they make their buisness on the concept that "windows is free" u.u"

  158. But I have a fully black background! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to have a fully black desktop with no icons on all my Windows desktops... am I now going to be blames as a pirate?

    1. Re:But I have a fully black background! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do I... you know, I just can see some sort of Linux advertisement background in the same fashion any time soon.

  159. What a great business choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux says: "thank you!"

  160. Buy it by Wyck · · Score: 1

    Pay for a genuine copy of Windows. There is no excuse not to.

    Discontinuing your use of Windows is the only alternative. I totally encourage you to switch to using free software if you can't afford to pay for Windows.

    The high price of Windows combined with the simplicity of stealing it, the anonymity of the theft and how essential the product is makes for the theft of it being a pretty common occurrence.

    Cellphones, razors, and clothes all have the same problem -- very easy to steal, except that it's pretty clear that people are regularly being caught and punished for those thefts. I'm not so sure that the average software thief is at any risk of being caught.

  161. if anyone is still reading this... by W33B · · Score: 0

    you can have my key
    UN00B-ROFLM-AOUR2-KEWL4-SK00L

  162. Re:Black? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd pay for the my little pony theme

  163. Don't Touch My Wallpaper! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 2, Funny

    My wallpaper is a screenshot of the entrance to that giant space cigar Doomsday Machine from Star Trek and I like to sit in front of it, squirming in my chair making faces-of-horror and sweating while singing "da-da da-da DA-DA DA-DA".

    But look at who I'm telling! Of course most of you reading this do the exact same thing! Ha ha ha.

    What?

    1. Re:Don't Touch My Wallpaper! by argent · · Score: 1

      The one where Kirk penetrates a giant flaming vagina dentata? The episode by Norman Spinrad where he put in more freudian references per second than Barbarella? I don't know whether to cheer or cringe in horror!

  164. Re:Oh wow. Which one, again? by Locklin · · Score: 1

    If you enjoy ignorance, just pay someone to do if for you. It will probably cost less than an XP licence.

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  165. VMware to the rescue.... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    If X requries n OS, big deal, just vmware it.

    Oh you need the ISO to install? thats just one google click away, and a few hours wait for the download to finish.

    If MS thinks their WGA and security is so good, why dont they release a new XP ISO every 3 months with all the patches included. Why do we have to do our own slipstream iso? 80 billion dollars doesnt buy you brains, just more hookers and cocaine and stupid people.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  166. this'll fix it by Crash+The+Soviet · · Score: 1

    well if a black background isn't what you want...a simple program like webshots told to change it once an hour...the hour starting right after microshafts, should do the trick.

  167. Re:Black? Niggles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One would hope that Linux would capitalise on the plight of Vistas over engineering and too many cooks syndrome. The only way and I mean the only way Linux is going to come out smellling like roses is for it to seriously bridge the gap between the two technologies Wine is in my opionon the the light at the end of the tunnel. Nativly support Win32 and itgrate it into the subsystem so when running an exe will have the same result on both systems and you have found the cure :)

  168. Already Black by n2art2 · · Score: 1

    Well that works for me. . . I already use a black only wallpaper on all of my computers. I figure it's for the greater good. Less battery consumption on laptops. Just trying to do my part. lol

    --
    Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
  169. WTF? I use a black background by choice... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    So now I need to use some bright, irritating wallpaper to convince people I'm not using unlicensed software? Fuck that. Microsoft needs to change their plans, because the first customer who accuses me of piracy because of my black desktop background means a lawsuit for tortious business interference for Microsoft.

  170. VMWare + Pirate bay by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    I've had no problems with a black screen, and I just hit the microsoft update servers last night. If there were a problem, I'd just roll back a snapshot. Funny how VMWare workstation, which I only use to run windoze was worth the money to me, where the OS I'm hosting under it certainly is not.

    Guess my XP Pro from TPB is legit, not that I ever use that session for anything any more. It was mainly for dealing with windoze-only crap while searching for a job last year. Why on earth would I pay for something that I normally would never use in the first place?

    1. Re:VMWare + Pirate bay by TheRealJobe · · Score: 1

      I would just love to know how you are able to roll back to a snapshot beyond 30days, if you tried this lame duck trick with Vista. It's smart enough to reach out of VMWare... so that leaves you with the old acitvation hacks which SP1 catches... which means you are either running a copy you cant patch any more, or have found a l337 hax0r trick that is publicly traded...Or you're using XP and this in no way relates to the topic... delayed burn FTW...

  171. Black Screen of PR Suicide by Torodung · · Score: 1

    BSOPRD

    Black Screen of Public Relations Disaster.

    On a side note, I bet support calls to display device makers go up as an unintended consequence. Yes, I know the icons will still be there, but you cannot overestimate the power of PEBKAC.

    What's it gonna take to get new management at MS? How big does the disaster have to be? Never mind the ethics, it would be nice to have someone who is worthy of the 90%+ market share shrewdly won with clever marketing and cutthroat keen business senses, if not quality.

    So much of computing, as it exists now, depends on Microsoft. This sad joke must end. Satisfactory management would be a step up. Right now, the only thing they're "F-ing burying" is themselves.

    Anyone with common sense doesn't want to see MS just implode like this.

    --
    Toro

  172. Effect on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the one effect this is going to have on me, Switching to Linux! If this is what happens when they cant sell that crap Vista I wonder what will hapen when Vista goes the way of the dodo. And I'm one of those idiots who has been actually BUYING Windows XP. Thank you Micro$oft for teaching me the error of my ways.

  173. Go ahead, make my day... by analogkid76 · · Score: 1

    Plain black *IS* my preferred background. Ha ha... suckers.

  174. Get out your dictionary editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And mod this up.

  175. I find this laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who pirate they get what they deserve!! It doesn't cost that much to purchase Windows if that is what you are running or plan to run!!! CMON folks. I bet these pirates don't bat an eye at spending 1000 bucks for new hardware and put the same ole pirated OS on it. If you don't want to pay for it run Linux. Linux has become so much easier to run these days there really is no reason to pirate the OS any longer. :)

  176. Autopatcher by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  177. Sorry, here's how to get the files: by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You have to get the Autopatcher packages themselves from torrent sites, and verify them with the MD5 hashes on the Autopatcher site. I thought they still had that info on the homepage but it's been removed. It has to be done this way to keep Microsoft off their asses.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  178. You thought that bullshit was clever? by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    No accounting for taste I suppose.

  179. D'OH!!! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    On further research you get them through the updater now. It's been so long since I've used that thing (read: had my own Windows computer)

    I'll shut up now.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  180. I just don't care by blastfamy · · Score: 1

    Good thing my desktop BG is black, and I don't use the system tray!

  181. Mod up Nagger Guy by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Before he has to kiss Bill Gates' ass.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  182. Re: another reason by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm hoping that TweakUI will let you make the "notification" appear if you want it to, that way I can increase my street-cred with my l33t buddies!

  183. one more nail in the windBloWs coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well they think this will do what exactly i know one thing it wont do get people to use windBloWs pistake
    but they will learn one day

  184. Niggle Please! by TheRealJobe · · Score: 1

    This was announced back before SP1. Why is this a suprise now? I thought the Emos would appreciate saving the otherwise hours spent searching for a background to show their inner darkness.

  185. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really don't think anyone is going to switch OS just because of this, that includes vista also. These guys don't care about the fact they are running pirated versions.

    Microsoft's efforts to annoy pirates are, however, quite amusing. Why don't they just stop the OS loading for pirate versions!

    New business model:

    Pirate versions get 1 week to run, then it will refuse to load, or load in limited mode, where user can only activate it.

    Instead of an annoying message that pops up, why not have a premium number in the start menu, with a day counter until Windows won't work. User has to phone to activate the software. Users can think of the cost of the call as cost of the upgrade (in the case of pezpunk's comments).

    End result:

    Microsoft richer.
    Customer annoyed but forced to use windows anyway. (which was no different to before the call!)

  186. I'm Black by basslineshift · · Score: 1

    I don't use windoze, but my desktop is black anyways, so it won't make a difference :]

  187. But that's the problem with WGA by cheros · · Score: 1

    MS has already demonstrated that it can't get WGA right. In addition, they are not exactly helping by making it compulsory to stick the license code holo on a system so that an average passerby can take a picture of it so you end up with a pirated serial number.

    So, if I run legit copies of Windows and this crap appears, I won't be embarrassed. I'll go after them for defamation and computer intrusion (their license cannot change applicable laws), and get as many people to join as I can manage. I'm sick and tired of having to prove that I'm not using pirated software. I wish they would spend as much energy on getting the code even remotely safe. Vista sucked like no vacuum cleaner will ever manage.

    That's also why most of our stuff now runs on Linux. They asked for it.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  188. just dont install it. by allforcarrie · · Score: 1

    just dont install the update, its that easy.

  189. Fine with me... by garwain · · Score: 1

    I don't even remember what my background image is. I've ALWAYS got an email program or 2 running, as well as several web browser windows, and various programming tools, so the desktop is never seen. If they painted their annoyance nag scren on TOP of everything else, I would be in the store purchasing a new copy immediatly.