I'm not having any issues with Red Steel. It took about 5 minutes to get the hang of the controls, but after that I think they rock. My 15 year old son has done nothing but bitch about control issues though. I think the issue, for him, is that he wants to use very gross movements to aim the gun and this takes the pipper out into the movement control zone rather than keeping it in the fire zone. When I play I bet the end of the Wiimote doesen't move much over an inch in any direction except when zooming in.
Hm, let's see. You then go on to say "there is no balance and that is damning evidence on its own", once again implying that somehow two groups of liars will somehow spout truth when they spout together. Still incorrect. You continue to imply that lie + lie = truth. Try reading your own posts. You make a statement (I assume it was meant to be facetious), then a platitude, and then continue in the same vein as the original statement rather than use it as a foil to make a point. This does not imply humor, if that was your intent, but condescension. If this was an attempt at juxtapositional comedy please rent some tapes of professionals that do the technique well and practice at home before taking the act out on the road. Mmmkay?
p.s. I never stopped reading your post, I finished the whole thing.
No, that means all spin and no truth. Bullshit + diametricly opposed bulshit is still bullshit. Adding the other side just changes it from a far to a fertilizer factory.
If the U.S. Congress wants me to feel they are earning their pay they need to repeal about 80% of the laws passed in the last 140 years and then sit qietly with their thumbs up their butts leaving me and everyone else alone until the next election. Since that is highly unlikely I doubt anything congress does would make me feel they were earning their pay.
No one deserves to get spam! Well, except other spammers. And they also deserve to be excluded from the No-Call-List. Oh, and they need lots and lots of unsolicited junk snail mail also.
And one more thing. They need annual IRS audits that continue for 5 years after they stop spamming. Just to be sure.
Anyone can write a bill. Only a Congressman or Senator can sponsor it for submition. If it makes it through committe they vote on it, and if it passes it goes to the other house. If it passes there it goes to the President who either signs it or vetos it. If it is vetoed then the houses of congress have a chance to override the President and pass the bill into law, but it requires a 66% majority, not a simple majority.
I have no damned idea. What I'm saying is that there is no solid evidence that can be applied to a falsifiable theory to explain climate change. I'm saying that the "we're going to cook the earth if we don't stop" kooks are no more right than the "We would be in an ice age if it weren't for human activity" kooks. And the "Humans don't have an effect on climate" kooks are just as, well, kooky.
Beats me. I don't read minds. More importantly it doesn't matter. Either the science is solid and the theories and models can be falsified, or it's junk.
And the consequences of over reacting in the other direction could be just as scary. Instaed of cooking like Venus we freeze like Mars. Maybe we are hastening our doom no matter what we do. The science on both sides looks questionable. Big gaps in data and lots of assumptions based on their emotional baggage. I'll just keep waiting until someone comes out with a model that is accurate for a few years and they can explain why it is.
3/ We take the prudent side and try to cut emissions... And we were wrong and the earth was heading for an ice age and now what was a managable situation is now a frozen wasteland.
4/ We just don't fucking know.
The issue for me is that none of the kooks on either side of the issue can make a coherent argument. Both sides seem to be cooking the books to get the emotional answer they want and that just sucks as science as far as I'm concerned.
Well, if the repubican poll workers don't mind zombies voting, why should you? Oh, and they vote Democrat because they are dead and need the Social Securiy befits that the Republicans want to abolish as an entitlemnet.
No, the areas wher you find the massive and super massive starts that can go nova usually have lots of sun sized stars also. The solar system was bombarded by the debris from a nearby super nova early in its life, ergo it was part of a stellar cluster.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not having any issues with Red Steel. It took about 5 minutes to get the hang of the controls, but after that I think they rock. My 15 year old son has done nothing but bitch about control issues though. I think the issue, for him, is that he wants to use very gross movements to aim the gun and this takes the pipper out into the movement control zone rather than keeping it in the fire zone. When I play I bet the end of the Wiimote doesen't move much over an inch in any direction except when zooming in.
You, deserve... mod, points, for that. :)
Where, exactly, was the egregious comma abuse?
Hm, let's see. You then go on to say "there is no balance and that is damning evidence on its own", once again implying that somehow two groups of liars will somehow spout truth when they spout together. Still incorrect. You continue to imply that lie + lie = truth. Try reading your own posts. You make a statement (I assume it was meant to be facetious), then a platitude, and then continue in the same vein as the original statement rather than use it as a foil to make a point. This does not imply humor, if that was your intent, but condescension. If this was an attempt at juxtapositional comedy please rent some tapes of professionals that do the technique well and practice at home before taking the act out on the road. Mmmkay?
p.s. I never stopped reading your post, I finished the whole thing.
+5 + -5 = NO SPIN ZONE
No, that means all spin and no truth. Bullshit + diametricly opposed bulshit is still bullshit. Adding the other side just changes it from a far to a fertilizer factory.
If the U.S. Congress wants me to feel they are earning their pay they need to repeal about 80% of the laws passed in the last 140 years and then sit qietly with their thumbs up their butts leaving me and everyone else alone until the next election. Since that is highly unlikely I doubt anything congress does would make me feel they were earning their pay.
Why should you go out and buy multiple tools to do the job of one tool, it's inefficient.
Oh, Spock. We humans aren't logical. You should know that by now.
No, IBM will profit the most. They make the processors for all three next-gen consoles. No matter which console wins, IBM wins.
Shhhh. What the hell are using logic for?!?!? This is an emotional issue.
Ummm. I believe you meant fishing expedition there. ;)
No one deserves to get spam! Well, except other spammers. And they also deserve to be excluded from the No-Call-List. Oh, and they need lots and lots of unsolicited junk snail mail also.
And one more thing. They need annual IRS audits that continue for 5 years after they stop spamming. Just to be sure.
Anyone can write a bill. Only a Congressman or Senator can sponsor it for submition. If it makes it through committe they vote on it, and if it passes it goes to the other house. If it passes there it goes to the President who either signs it or vetos it. If it is vetoed then the houses of congress have a chance to override the President and pass the bill into law, but it requires a 66% majority, not a simple majority.
I have no damned idea. What I'm saying is that there is no solid evidence that can be applied to a falsifiable theory to explain climate change. I'm saying that the "we're going to cook the earth if we don't stop" kooks are no more right than the "We would be in an ice age if it weren't for human activity" kooks. And the "Humans don't have an effect on climate" kooks are just as, well, kooky.
Now, there's some logic. Can't argue aginst that.
Beats me. I don't read minds. More importantly it doesn't matter. Either the science is solid and the theories and models can be falsified, or it's junk.
And the consequences of over reacting in the other direction could be just as scary. Instaed of cooking like Venus we freeze like Mars. Maybe we are hastening our doom no matter what we do. The science on both sides looks questionable. Big gaps in data and lots of assumptions based on their emotional baggage. I'll just keep waiting until someone comes out with a model that is accurate for a few years and they can explain why it is.
or
... And we were wrong and the earth was heading for an ice age and now what was a managable situation is now a frozen wasteland.
3/ We take the prudent side and try to cut emissions
4/ We just don't fucking know.
The issue for me is that none of the kooks on either side of the issue can make a coherent argument. Both sides seem to be cooking the books to get the emotional answer they want and that just sucks as science as far as I'm concerned.
Well, he has already admited that it's not his fault that he can't spell. Obviously poor grammar is not his fault either.
Well, if the repubican poll workers don't mind zombies voting, why should you? Oh, and they vote Democrat because they are dead and need the Social Securiy befits that the Republicans want to abolish as an entitlemnet.
Hell, all of us WoW dorks got a date. Actually we're swingers. Tonight its me, Rosie Palm, and her five daughters.
Kiss my shiny metal ass, meatsack!
But I bet they are adicted to that electricity they abuse. Damned robots always jacking in.
Danger. Do not post while you have a burger in your hand and the music blaring otherwise you may spell as poorly as I did in the previous post.
No, the areas wher you find the massive and super massive starts that can go nova usually have lots of sun sized stars also. The solar system was bombarded by the debris from a nearby super nova early in its life, ergo it was part of a stellar cluster.
Thanks! That's so nice of you. Now ship me my free shit. ;)