Slashdot Mirror


World of Warcraft and UDE Point System Fiasco

Richard Manley writes "A report on the card game trinket fiasco. When the UDE (Upper Deck Entertainment) point system finally went live, I would imagine most of the people that logged in felt the same fury I did. Blizzard knows the lengths that its fans will go to get trinkets (look at the price of Murloc cards on eBay), but their arrangement with Upper Deck simply takes advantage of the good will many fans have shown." From the article: "This means that in order to get these trinkets, one would have to purchase 9 BOXES of cards for the fireworks and 21 BOXES of cards for the ogre. What does this mean? Want a fireworks trinket? Sure, it is only going to cost you $900.00. Want an Ogre trinket? No problem, it is only going to cost you $2,100.00. Bear in mind that these items are purely for show off purposes and give no in-game advantage to players." Having been through the Magic: The Gathering addiction twice, I've decided staying away from this Collectible Card Game is a good idea.

251 comments

  1. CCQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, you're staying away from the Civil Code of Quebec?

    1. Re:CCQ? by reklusband · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry, posted to the wrong thread...There goes my karma...

    2. Re:CCQ? by reklusband · · Score: 0

      see! tOLD YOu I knew it. FUCK SLASHDOT! STILL NOT POsTING INFORMATION THAT IS contrIBUTORY. WiLL BE BACK

    3. Re:CCQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buttes

  2. The technical term is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sucker!

  3. What will happen by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Players of WoW will be pissed for about two weeks, then blizzard will implement [Axe of ZOMGWTF Pwnage], and soon they'll all be off to EPL to grind the 400 zombie asses they need to turn in to get it. This is just the epic obsession of the month. Next patch there will be something better.

    1. Re:What will happen by GalionTheElf · · Score: 1

      You know this is about the WoW card game right? Only real life grinding involved in getting these epics.

      --
      I'm going over here and I don't know why!
    2. Re:What will happen by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the Friendly Article. This is about there being in-game (as in the computer game) rewards for people who spend real-life money on these collectible cards. My point is that this will follow the path that every other set of new content brings: People will be obsessed about it for a month, then the next patch will come out new content and they will move on.

    3. Re:What will happen by bigdavesmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, I don't think there's going to be any 'grinding' going on wherever this card game is concerned.

    4. Re:What will happen by thelost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      doubtful. More likely is that as with most things in WoW the most heard voices will be from a loud few, who get distracted a few days later by a perceived nurf to their fav class or weapon.

      I think no community can bark louder than than the WoW one, but seeing as the majority are a bunch of kids it just doesn't fucking matter.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    5. Re:What will happen by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      OP's point is that once the next best thing comes out the unwashed masses will be attracted to the next shiny sparkly object. For example, once the expansion is released, (ZOMG LAAATE BLIZ I H888888TE JOO!!!) there will be WTFPWN LEVEL 70 EPIX!!! to covet instead of useless trinkets.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    6. Re:What will happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah apologies, I did indeed not RTFA. I will now go and strap myself into the stocks, please feel free to fling rotten vegetables at me.

    7. Re:What will happen by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      no community can bark louder than than the WoW one

      Might that not have something to do with the size of the WoW community?

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    8. Re:What will happen by jank1887 · · Score: 1
      I think you missed the subtle SEXUAL REFERENCE in the preceeding post...

      grinding... heh

    9. Re:What will happen by samurphy21 · · Score: 1
    10. Re:What will happen by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Actually during magic the gatherings hey day, Mox's passed hands this way at least once at one of the big con's. Pretty girl earned her card the "old fashioned" way.

      Then there was the guy who took a handful of rares and tossed it off the balcony into the crowd and berated them as they crawled around on the ground trying to get the cards.

      The internet was young-- a guy in italy sent me a check directly for my arabians, legends, and something else (antiquities?) for 3 grand. Today, you'd ebay or something.

      Legends paid my college debts. $75 a box at the start- they peaked over $750 a box and were easy to sell.

      I finally dropped out of the entire thing after a couple years- there was some red set that they grossly overprinted, it was becoming easy to counterfeit cards, and money made too much of a difference in who won and who lost- but it was a fun ride.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:What will happen by Astarica · · Score: 1

      In WoW most grinds, no matter how crazy, you're at least given the information in some form so you know what to expect. Take a typical faction grind, you need X amount of faction and with some effort you can determine what's a likely rate of faction gain per unit of time (say, an hour). Therefore you can get a rough idea of how many hours it takes to go through the grind, so at least you've some idea of what to expect. Here no such information was given. Maybe there is nothing wrong with a '$2100 grind' for an Ogre suit or whatever, but people need to at least have a chacne to know that's what they're looking at before starting, which they did not.

    12. Re:What will happen by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm old-school or a fogie, but I don't understand spending such huge amounts of real world money for a purely virtual good. This is even worse than the gold-buying that goes on, as the trinkets and mounts and tabards(oh my!) don't even serve a purpose.

      But I guess the prices on eBay show that people really are spending this much...

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    13. Re:What will happen by thelost · · Score: 1

      undoubtedly, but it also has a lot to do with the average age of a WOW player - i mean, what percentage of WoW players actually use the wow forums? An extremely small percentage, a great deal 'hardcore' and extremely vocal, even if it was 10% of the wow population that would be another 90% that just doesn't care.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
  4. rtards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    what do you expect them to do? they want to milk you cash cows for all you're worth before the next game comes out or you lose your job and your wife leaves you, whichever happens first.

    1. Re:rtards by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      When you become the subject of South Park you kind of need to rethink your life.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    2. Re:rtards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what do you expect them to do? they want to milk you cash cows for all you're worth before the next game comes out or you lose your job and your wife leaves you, whichever happens first


      If that's what Blizzard thinks is best.
    3. Re:rtards by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      rtard

      HA! Rtard! So, that's what they said on South Park. See, learn something new everyday.

      Sorry, I have to keep this short because I have to go and buy a new GM car because there's this cool exclusive garbage can I want to put in my house.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      ps. the funniest thing is the card game has a "Leroy Jenkins" card. hehe

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    4. Re:rtards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      True. Fucking Canadians have some serious thinking to do.

    5. Re:rtards by draxbear · · Score: 1

      I reckon we need to coin a new term for the Internet "eTard" in honor of Leroy and many of the other blinding acts of stupidity we all see online everyday.

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    6. Re:rtards by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      I reckon we need to coin a new term for the Internet "eTard" in honor of Leroy and many of the other blinding acts of stupidity we all see online everyday.

      It's not clear from your post, but you do know that the Leroy Jenkins video was staged, right? Or at least that's the idea, but you can read it all here.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  5. Aah yes ... by nbvb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aah yes, the UDE system... I'd much prefer CCQ myself as well. Although I never had an MtG problem, I still fear MiG's that were sold to some unfriendly countries.

    What the heck does all THAT mean? I must be getting old ....

    It seems to me that the more time passes, the less I understand around here. Funny how that happens.

    1. Re:Aah yes ... by Coco+Lopez · · Score: 1

      Users Dumb, Exploit.

    2. Re:Aah yes ... by boule75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I fully agree. Mod him up.

      Unless you spend half of your weeks to roam forums about this game, there's no way to understand this article.

      I was hoping that just reading games.slashdot.org twice a month would be enough to make me appear a shining gammer amongst my friends but... I just cannot read it anymore!

      Gosh... then, what were those acronyms again? UDE, CCQ, MtG, MiG, THAT, RTFA, IANAL...

      --
      I am not Remy Mouton, unfortunately: http://remy.mouton.free.fr/art/
    3. Re:Aah yes ... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I was hoping that just reading games.slashdot.org twice a month would be enough to make me appear a shining gammer

      How would reading games.slashdot.org make you look like an old woman? Sorry, I just couldn't resist ;-)

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Aah yes ... by inca34 · · Score: 1

      I have perused all the comments so far and still, no one seems to care what these acronyms mean. It's usually considered good form to use the full title of something if you are only going to type it once in your article. Heaven forbid you type an extra 10 characters for clarity.

      Collectible Card Game (CCG) For those who can't spell (CCQ)
      Magic the Gathering (MtG)
      Mikoyan-Gurevich [design team] (MiG)
      Upper Deck Entertainment (UDE)

      WoW, I thought knowing the acronyms might lead to some deeper insight into the topic. OMGROFLBBQ, it doesn't mean jack!

    5. Re:Aah yes ... by mmalove · · Score: 1

      I think CCQ is supposed to be CCG, or collectible card game. MtG is Magic the Gathering, arguably the most successsful of all CCG spanning nine editions and over a dozen expansions. MtG put Wizards of the Coast on the map. MiGs are dated jet airplanes. UDE I can't figure out the acronym, but it's a point reward system like when you collect UPCs off a cereal box, and if you ate captain crunch for a year you could get a free T-shirt. The original poster (OP) is complaining because the company advertised the free T-shirt, but didn't specify how much cereal you'd have to eat, and so the OP went out and bought truckloads of cereal he didn't like just for the T-shirt, but with no idea how much cereal he'd need. Somehow, that's Blizzards fault in the mind of the OP, so now the article refers to it as a "fiasco".

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
    6. Re:Aah yes ... by Voltronalpha · · Score: 4, Informative

      I run a retail game shop so I will explain:

      UDE (Upper Deck Entertainment) Released a card game for WoW last week, it is one of the better CCG's (collectible card game) we've seen in a long long time.

      In each pack of cards is a 'FREE' UDE points card, it is worth 100 UDE points, which are good for redeeming UDE merchandise and in game WoW items.

      The submitter (and invariably slashdot) have a pretty tainted view of things, since this item is free and is there simply as a value add to the card game, they of course make no mention of the 'loot' cards you can pull in the set that give you in game mounts one of which is currently ebaying for $250~300.

      Only complaints about the free item they put into the card packs, which reward the CCG game players for purchasing the packs.

      Any WoW online player that bought the packs only for the possibility of getting online items is a huge and total fool.

      People want to complain when a product that wasn't meant to be used in a certain way doesn't work the way they want it too as is the case here.

      This is a CCG rarity and scarcity are a factor for people who play a game like this, you either grok that and are okay with it and play the game or you don't.

      Also as another note, this game is so good it's sold out within the week at 100's of stores across the country (including mine)

      I can tell you, since I sold 90% of the product at my shop no one there even cared about the points (or if they did, it was an after thought)

      --
      There is evidence to prove both Democrats and Republicans are lying cocksuckers. Vote independently.
    7. Re:Aah yes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh... then, what were those acronyms again? UDE, CCQ, MtG, MiG, THAT, RTFA, IANAL...

      I can help with that last one. It's an acronym used by those who are tight-asses and is short for "I'm Anal". HTH!

    8. Re:Aah yes ... by dave562 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It seems to me that the more time passes, the less I understand around here. Funny how that happens.

      Have you noticed that too? Do you ever feel like "the powers that be" only choose to "inform" a particular age bracket about what "cool" is and after a while, you realize you aren't getting those messages anymore? =)

    9. Re:Aah yes ... by nbvb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much. It seems that after I zipped past the 18-24 demographic, things went right past me. And that was some years ago ....

    10. Re:Aah yes ... by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      You had us all tricked that you were agreeing with him, until we got down to your sig. *deep breath* NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERD *points*

    11. Re:Aah yes ... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I think it's right around the time you naturally figure out that you really don't need any of the crap that they're selling that the sellers decide that they don't need to market to you anymore. Kind of funny how that works, huh? =)

    12. Re:Aah yes ... by Bloody+Troll · · Score: 1
      MiGs are dated jet airplanes.
      They're not as dated as you're hoping.
    13. Re:Aah yes ... by boule75 · · Score: 1

      eheh... I _was_ agreeing with him. About my sig :
      - I am not very good at finding signatures.
      - And I am regularly fed up of being unable to fill in posts with non-us-ascii characters in it: slashhdot will just spout such HTML code nonsens whenever I try to type in an accentuated letter (disclaimer : I am French).
      - so this is a protestation rather then a funny signature. Indeed. Not funny at all.

      Sig: sorry for my sig.

      --
      I am not Remy Mouton, unfortunately: http://remy.mouton.free.fr/art/
  6. Uh oh by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a 50 DKP MINUS!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does that even mean?

    2. Re:Uh oh by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Whelps. Many whelps left side. HANDLE IT!

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    3. Re:Uh oh by oc255 · · Score: 1

      DKP = dragon kill points

      The quote 50 dkp minus is a reference to numerous ytmnd sites featuring a sound sample captured from Teamspeak/Ventrillo (two popular voice chat programs WoW-ers use) where the leader of a Raid (40 people running through a dungeon to kill bosses/enemies) yells at his players. The yeller of "50 DKP Minus!" is a player named Dives from a guild named Wipe Club (the term wipe means to have all your party members die, ie: wipe-out). It other words, it's a quote-joke.

      The term DKP is from the EQ days (so I've heard). Because items (loot) are rare and hard to get, people work for them. In a group of 40 people that run (go) a lot, people develop these kinds of systems to keep things fair. In the DKP system, you kill bosses for points and turn them in for items. This might sound ridiculous but it's similar to reward-points on your credit card. The more you use/play, the more stuff you get and you thereby have helped the group grow.

      Dives talks with a very excited accent and sounds like a crazed Indian general yelling out spastic orders. His voice is easily impersonated and his quotes work as a faux-penalty. For example, if someone kicked you in the shin, you might quote Seinfeld and say "no soup for you", even though they don't want soup. So in this way, some guild say "50 DKP MINUS!" when someone screws up even though they don't use the DKP system.

      All in all, it's all complicated to the outsider because it's a deep hobby. Personally I think DKP is overly-complex and I like Suicide Kings better. It's simple, you suicide to get an item and fall to the end of the line. If you don't suicide, you stay at the front of the line and the next person chooses whether to suicide or not. Much better imo, but I'm sure others would argue that it's too simple and it has problems.

    4. Re:Uh oh by Kesshi · · Score: 1
      That's a 50 DKP MINUS!
      What the fuck does that even mean?

      That is a refrence to a soundclip of a nazi raid leader that was released and became popular. Many of the battles in WoW are fairly technical, meaning you do more than shoot the gun, swing the axe, or cast the spell. Coordinating 39 other people to move to the right place at the right time, or even asking the other 39 people to stop attacking doesn't always end up with the end result you'd like. This can be very frustrating. The nazi raid leader brings this to a whole new level.

      The original soundclip is from the battle with Onyxia where you have to move around quite a bit more than most fights, depending on how the dragon is reacting. The nazi raid leader is SCREAMING about how people are "Staning in the wrong fucking place" while calling for "More DOTs! More DOTs now!" and spouting "I want you to DPS very fucking slowly." You can hear the veins poping out of his forhead when he screams.

      Onyxia = a large dragon that can be assaulted with up to 40 players
      DOT = Damage Over Time ability
      DPS = Damage Per Second

      But the real charmer is when he screams "That's a 50 DKP minus!" Various sound boards, music mixed in, etc. have spawned off this "That's a 50 DKP minus!" bit. It's quite amusing, even if you only a casual WoW raider.

      DKP = Dragon Killing Points, a system to keep track of individual participation vs rewards netted.

      Think of it as the "All Your Base" of World of Warcraft.
      --
      Press +++ for Sysop access
    5. Re:Uh oh by Grail · · Score: 1

      A useful point of reference for those not in the WoW scene: the usual way of accumulating DKP equates to somewhere in the order of 5 DKP per hour. For example, 10 DKP for turning up to a raid, 5 points for each boss. Spend four hours, kill eight bosses and you have accumulated 50 DKP.

      The rate of point earning varies from guild to guild (some guilds award DKP purely on time invested, others purely by boss kills), but the fact still remains that "50 DKP MINUS" is a significant penalty to any raider - it's the WoW equivalent of being given a two week suspension the week before the grand final.

  7. HELP! by spectrokid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    English....? Anyone? Please?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:HELP! by teslar · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Step 1: Sell a WoW card game where each pack gives people 100 points.
      Step 2: Promise the points can be traded in WoW for something shiny but useless, eventually.
      Step 3: Eventually require up to 50,000 points for those shiny things, equalling the purchase of 2,100$ worth of cards.
      Step 4: PROFIT!!! Actually, strike that, get an angry mob... for about 20 Minutes until they go raiding again.

    2. Re:HELP! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      yes, really, some context please for those of us who don't follow WoW that closely?

      they are selling some sort of real-world cards that give you some sort of game points for some unspecified purpose?

    3. Re:HELP! by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      They're selling a "collectible card game". Each $20ish pack has cards, and '100 points' you can redeem for novelty WoW trinkets. Nothing is available for 100 points except for desktop wallpapers. Everything is worth like 10,000 points. That's just a little past ridiculous, and I think Blizzard is rightfully feeling some sort of backlash against this. Not OMG-the-online-world-is-over backlash, but still: it's a grand way to get some of your more devoted players (with greater fiscal resources) pissed off. I don't think that's quite good business - pissing people off for a few quick bucks.

      Lucky for me, I'm not one of the affected parties.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:HELP! by virg_mattes · · Score: 4, Informative

      The context is a crossover for marketing. Blizzard (who publishes the WoW online game) contracted with Upper Deck (a card manufacturer) to publish a WoW collectible card game. As a draw for the online folks, they put 100 "points" in each pack of cards, with a promise that those points could be used to purchase items in the WoW online game. So, a lot of online-WoW players ponied up for the cards to get points, before the points and rewards were announced. When Blizzard announced how many points each trinket or doodad cost, the points were so high that people would need to buy thousands of dollars worth of cards before they could amass enough points to get anything but lowball stuff like screensavers/wallpaper. WoW players who bought cards just for the online points are now understandably bent out of shape about it.

      Virg

    5. Re:HELP! by gsslay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's just a little past ridiculous, and I think Blizzard is rightfully feeling some sort of backlash against this.

      You know, if they were trinkets that were easy to get then everyone would have them, and all the dimwits who are getting so upset about this wouldn't want them.

      And it seems pretty clear to me that having introduced a reward system, Blizzard are unlikely to just leave it at these daft card games. You could pick up points in all manner of other ways. Some points, its to be hoped, could be earned in ways that don't involve you having more money that sense.

    6. Re:HELP! by guy-in-corner · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Some points, its to be hoped, could be earned in ways that don't involve you having more money that sense.

      How about a WoW-branded credit card? Instead of cashback, you get in-game points for real-world spending.

    7. Re:HELP! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Some points, its to be hoped, could be earned in ways that don't involve you having more money that sense.

      Well, we are talking about WoW players...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:HELP! by whoop · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, arcades had the same scheme going. You got tickets from playing the skeeball game (the fun games didn't give tickets). Then you turned in the tickets for crap prizes. Things like a pencil were 50 tickets. A good game might get you ten or so tickets. So you spend 50 cents per game * 5 games, $2.50, for a $0.05 pencil. Woohoo!

      New interface, same scheme.

    9. Re:HELP! by A.+Bosch · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I must be getting old. Up until your post I had no idea what the hell was going on.

      --
      Where there is the necessary technical skill to move mountains, there is no need for the faith that moves mountains.
    10. Re:HELP! by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The people who would get upset about this are those people burdened with an impossible completism, who seem to think that they can get one of "everything" in an MMO. It's a goal that is both unrealistic and really neurotic.

      The more I look at the world of MMOs - and I play one - the more I see a cesspool of dysfunctional personalities, the exploitation of mental and personal problems, and the exaltation of the worst behaviour. I know many people play them casually and enjoy them (I'd like to think I do), but they are dominated by people I can only describe as lost souls.

    11. Re:HELP! by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Yeh, down with Blizzard, and once we've hit them, we're moving onto the bigger target, those one-armed bandits at the fair which dish out tickets instead of money... 300 for a pencil! This is outrageous!

    12. Re:HELP! by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is if this is the only way to get these trinkets. Having exclusives here and there are fine (like the Murloc pet), but putting a bunch of items that can only be obtained through spending large amounts of money on a CCG seems a little greedy. I understand that Blizzard's there to make money, just like any other business. Of course, like you mentioned, if they let you obtain points other ways, that might take a little pressure off the card game.

    13. Re:HELP! by Morlark · · Score: 1

      Greedy? I have to say that I disagree about that. Blizzard are selling a CCG (Incidentally, it happens to be a very good one, from what I've heard), and with this CCG they've decided to give away some free in-game WoW item. Blizzard aren't forcing anybody to play or buy this CCG. If someone is dumb enough to buy the large number of stuff purely to get the reward, then quite frankly that's their own damned problem. Blaming Blizzard for producing and selling a damned fine CCG is just plain stupid.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
  8. Murlocs? by Nemetroid · · Score: 1

    A qucik search on eBay for "murloc" only nets you two results, and neither is a card.

    1. Re:Murlocs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cards expired 2 days ago. They're no longer valid. If you search the completed items I imagine you'll find the mad rush of cards people tried to off before they expired.

    2. Re:Murlocs? by GodaiYuhsaku · · Score: 1

      The murloc/beta cards from Blizzcon won't be on ebay anymore. Blizzard decided to make all the codes expire a few days ago. So the codes are worthless now.

    3. Re:Murlocs? by badfrog · · Score: 1

      They Changed their minds about that. But there's probably just not that many left, I think Blizzcon was about 8000 people. However when they're on ebay, they go around $400.

  9. It's an all-volunteer army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Complaining about this makes as much sense as being a devout Catholic and then getting all upset with the arbitrary rituals and limitations that come with the package.

    1. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      MPU

      well said. That comment invalidates about half the comments on slashdot that are complaints about DRM, MS, MMORPGs with subscription fees, etc.

    2. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      That comment invalidates about half the comments on slashdot that are complaints about ... MS ...
      To be fair, I doubt most of the people on Slashdot could force their company/family/friends to go to another OS, even if they wanted to. So complaining about MS is more like complaining about the quality of your government... While you technically have the power to change it, first you have to convince most of the people around you it's worth the effort.
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    3. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      "makes as much sense as being a devout Catholic"

      Wait, are you saying that religion is just a giant rep grind with feeble rewards at the end? ZOMG! Why am I playing this game!

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    4. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Yes, because we all know it's SO HARD to buy and use an Apple.

    5. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      That comment invalidates about half the comments on slashdot that are complaints about DRM, ...

      Really? How does this analogy work exactly?

      Devout DRM lovers get all upset with the arbitrary limitations that come with the package?

    6. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by Chmcginn · · Score: 1
      Yes, because we all know it's SO HARD to buy and use an Apple.
      No, it's not. But convincing my mom, my boss, or my wife to do so, on the other hand, is a non-trivial problem.
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    7. Re:It's an all-volunteer army by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      Metaphore makes no room for incompetence.

      But Windows is great, why changes.

  10. Assumptions! by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article makes a huge assumption: That the cards are the ONLY way to get UDE points. Maybe this is just the first way. Maybe you can also earn them by grinding, in-game. Or winning contests. Or special quests. Or other WoW merchandise.

    Or maybe they just placed an extra 0 on all the stuff online by accident.

    Or maybe they really are just greedy bastards and know how to exploit the playerbase of the most popular game in the world.

    Or maybe, just maybe... They meant it to be REALLY FSCKING TOUGH to get those. They aren't special if everyone has one.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Assumptions! by Kookus · · Score: 1

      They aren't supposed to be "special" in the sense that only 1 person has them. They would have been special enough if everyone who bought cards got them, because even that will only be a fraction of the WoW player base. It's just infuriating that Blizzard would take a hard stance on trading items in game for real world currency, and then basically slap a price tag on novelty items to the tune of a few grand.

      You could buy yourself a very well geared character on ebay for less than the amount you'd need to spend to acquire just that trinket the spews off a particle effect... Ooooh, wow, shiny!

      I Played Magic: The Gathering, and it was a fun game. I could see myself playing the card game of Warcraft, because as I bought cards there would be some other incentive, but currently, there is no incentive. I'm not going to be buying 3 grand worth of cards to get some novelty items. The other prizes in the card game are on scratch off cards, and those are the "rare" items that not everyone gets. Since those are really the only actual prizes you can win, you might as well just buy them off ebay if you really want them, because it will be a helluvalot cheaper.

    2. Re:Assumptions! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Hey, you're surfing while you're astroturfing!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Assumptions! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Might be true IF I played WoW, or worked for the company. I just see a lot of FUD and feel the need to fight it. Screaming 'FIRE!' when you see a whisp of smoke is FUD.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Assumptions! by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe they didn't want you to buy the cards just to get the in-game items? It's supposed to be a bonus, not the reason.

      I suspect if you went to them and offered them 1/10th of that price for the item, and only the item, they'd quickly open up a shop and sell it to you.

      Do I think it sounds amazingly stupid as the system stands? Absolutely. I just don't believe this is the end of the system, only the beginning.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:Assumptions! by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      Tough is one thing. Tough should be spending time and effort to achieve something in-game. Rare drops, difficult instances (dungeons), possibly even something that requires strategy.

      Tough shouldn't be 'how much can we make them buy'. This is very similar to the discussions that have been taking place lately about purchasing content instead of having it available through playing the game.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    6. Re:Assumptions! by Kookus · · Score: 1

      The bonus items are their "in" to the market. It's obvious that the reason they are there is to attract people that would normally never think of playing a card game of that nature or have other card games they already have an investment in. What better way to launch a game than to provide a bonus in it for their other product that has 7 million+ people (that is being tailored to a more casual player) with investments in. What do you expect when those casuals find that they have to become a "hardcore" buyer of cards in order to get anything out of it? It's a big turn off. I bought a few packs on launch day to see if it was worth it, and it's not. I'll stick to my MtG and if for some reason I really need to have that turtle mount or whatever, I'll buy it off ebay in a few months when they go for 20 bucks a piece. The game itself is tailored for a huge investment, and half of the available playability of the game revolves around expansions that haven't been released yet. With Magic the Gathering, you can go out and buy a starter deck that will give you many more hours of playability and enjoyment then this wasteful card game. Seriously, if you want the collectibles for the mmorpg, buy them off ebay.

    7. Re:Assumptions! by B0red+At+W0rk · · Score: 0

      How ironical that your post is made up entirely of assumptions.

    8. Re:Assumptions! by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I'll go with GREEDY BASTARDS.

      Going offtopic here --- but as an ex-gaming/hobby retailer, I feel the need to vent some spleen as regards Upper Dick.

      [rant on]
      To put it bluntly, they shit all over the hobby retailer by giving exclusive launches to chains like Blockbuster Video (search on www.icv2.com for "upper deck blockbuster" to find information about the Shaman King launch, and other complaints), whose stores don't host tournaments or staff employees knowledgable in CCG's. Furthermore, UDE offers their latest Yu-Gi-Oh expansions to Wal-Mart weeks before the hobby stores can get them. Hell, I couldn't even order direct from UDE because they refused to do business with a store unless they purchased cards by the case --- an investment that won't be recovered since the players will be all stocked up from Wally World before the store gets their first shipment. When the kids showed up in our store with their brand new cards, they were shocked that we didn't host Yu-Gi-Oh tournaments!
      [/rant off]

      Upper Deck does not care about the quality of their games, or about the hobby stores that promote them. They care about selling cards --- period.

    9. Re:Assumptions! by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      The game itself is tailored for a huge investment,...

      And Magic isn't?!?

    10. Re:Assumptions! by Kookus · · Score: 1

      Those are some mighty fine ellipses you got in that quote!

    11. Re:Assumptions! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I was into MTG for as long as it took to realize that my friends were more willing to spend 100's of $ on cards than I was. I then quickly realized that only if I was willing to spend as much money/time/effort as them would I ever have decks that compete. So I quit before I was more than a few booster packs in.

      From that realization, it became pretty clear to me that SOME company would exploit this. Apparently Upper Deck was the one. And why? Because they provided what people want, regardless of whether they actually care about the customer or not.

      I hate this. I wish people were willing to spend a little more money on companies that care, rather than whoever provides what they want cheapest. But that's economics for you.

      And by the time a company has grown to UD's marketshare, it's a juggernaut and can't be stopped without legal intervention, because it produces the products people want, and nobody else has the money to anymore.

      Yes, UD are money-grubbing bastards... But it's because the people let them be.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    12. Re:Assumptions! by Keldi · · Score: 1

      Aladrin is right, large (and incorrect) assumptions are being made. No one at GWN seems to have read the designer's official FAQ for the UDE points, or done any research past punching numbers into a calculator. What a surprise! Looks like the whiners haven't either.

      You get 100 points for buying a pack of cards. Rewards for participating in any sponsored tournament, whether local game store or regional event, will likely rank in thousands of points. Just participating, not actually winning. Winning will theoretically net you over ten thousand points. (Dependant upon the tournament level, etc...) The cheapest item is the Tabard at 2500 points, with a lifetime count of 25000. Not to mention all the other prizes you can get like play mats, counters, special cards, etc. Sure, 25000 is a lot, but that's 25000 including everything you'd spent up until that point.

      The trinkets and UDE point system were specifically designed to reward people who play the game. After you'd been to a few tournaments, you'd get a special tabard to show you play. Winning tournaments wouldn't just be something to be happy about IRL; it would be represented in WoW as well.

      Of course, people are whining because it's expensive to buy the cool stuff. It's also expensive to BUY enough gold off eBay for an epic mount, but you don't need to spend real world money to get one; you just have to play the game. It doesn't hurt that it's a damn good card game.

      Waaah! No free lunch!

  11. Mediocre Article at Best by Preebs · · Score: 1

    I do like how 2 of the 3 pictures in the article are about the board game and not the card game. Also complaining because you bought cards, NOT to play the card game but to get the in-game items seems a bit absurd to me.

    1. Re:Mediocre Article at Best by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree with you there. This is marketed as a collectible card game. Play the game or collect the cards, but the cards themselves are what you're paying for. I haven't played MtG in about 7 or 8 years now but I still buy a pack every now and then just for the artwork and such. I'll likely buy a good ammount of these WoW cards to collect for the same reason (I would play if I could find someone local to play with, but that's unlikely given my rural locale).

      The bottom line is that these things are simply side prizes for people who happen to buy an ass load of cards. It's already been so aptly pointed out that these extras offer no extra functionality at all. They're just for show, so you shouldn't somehow feel entitled to one just for buying a pack of cards. That's the real reason I think Blizzard gets blamed for WoW obsession: people think that they should be able to obtain every fricking item available in the game.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Mediocre Article at Best by Shiptar · · Score: 1

      He also rambles about an orc trinket and then it magically becomes an ogre trinket. THis must have been a high school essay contest winner.

    3. Re:Mediocre Article at Best by Preebs · · Score: 1

      Another thing I'd like to add to my comment is that they are most certainly planning expansions for the WoW trading card game. Look at how many MtG has had over it's span. People who want to get the highest prizes now are insane, imho. I bought my starter pack to play the game, not to obtain worthless ingame loot.

  12. A fool and their money are soon parted by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So let me get this straight. I group of people bought large amounts of some card game they didn't actually want to play, because they would get some points, with no idea as to how many points they will need. Then it turns out the things they can buy with the points are really expensive.

    Why not either a) Buy the cards for the cards, or b) Wait until you know how much things will cost before buying the cards?

    --
    Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    1. Re:A fool and their money are soon parted by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well that is of course the explanation to the whole article summed up!

      a) It probably stinks and/or doesn't have pretty graphics.
      b) They would not be wasting so much time with a game if they could demonstrate such signs of intelligence.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:A fool and their money are soon parted by Epsilon+Plus · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be logical at all - you have to remember who we're talking about.

    3. Re:A fool and their money are soon parted by dim5 · · Score: 1

      Slightly OT but... is the card game any good? Does anybody who just bought 1,000 of them for no reason want to give them to me? I tell you what, if you need trinkets so bad, I've got some salt and pepper shakers you can have in exchange. They look like little amish people.

      --

      Is something burning?
      Oh, it's my karma.

    4. Re:A fool and their money are soon parted by clacke · · Score: 1
      Amen.


      Current purchasers at least have the luxury of knowing the absurd rates these trinkets will cost them, but those of us that purchased cards prior to the release of this information were absolutely screwed.


      Yes, like any other sucker in this world who bought a pig in a poke.
  13. Dorks by DJ+Jones · · Score: 0, Troll

    You clearly all need a good smack in the face and a date.

    1. Re:Dorks by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Hell, all of us WoW dorks got a date. Actually we're swingers. Tonight its me, Rosie Palm, and her five daughters.

    2. Re:Dorks by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Don't knock masturbation.

      It's sex with somone I love...

  14. Why don't you... by Harin_Teb · · Score: 1

    I don't know... buy cards from people who buy the card game? here's the deal: People who play the card game don't need 100 points. tey will get rid of them for much cheaper than you would pay for a pack. PLUS if nobody plays the game it will fail. A failed CCG means you can buy a box of boosters at the low low price of 10-20 bucks. tops.

    1. Re:Why don't you... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Yep. I bought 2 starter decks and a couple booster packs of the Babylon 5 CCG back when it came out. I played it a bit with a few friends but no one (including myself) found it too interesting. Recently I was on Ebay and noticed booster boxes of the game and it's 2 expansion sets going for less than $5. I ended up buying 3 booster boxes of it from the same person for less than $20 after shipping. No I don't play them anymore, but the "collectability" portion of the game (even if I'm probably the only person who want to collect certain cards :)) is still kinda neat.

      If the Warcraft card game fails then you'll see cheapo booster boxes very soon.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  15. capitalism by zoftie · · Score: 1

    Greed is a good thing, except when it runs over any other sense, like it did this time. Looks like they bracketed costs of trinkets to other sort of similar costs of online items. Except these have *NO* in game value, as per sysem of points, experience.

    I don't play WoW, but what a way to get burnt... maybe they can have trinkets rented with micropayments, like 0.01$ for each use? [I shouldn't give them ideas eh ?]

  16. WoW by nawtykitty · · Score: 1

    All buyers of these cards got pwned...

    --
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    1. Re:WoW by blaket · · Score: 1

      Unless of course we want to actually, you know, play the card game.

      --
      ----- Blake
  17. Vanity is Expensive by popo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Complaining about the cost of "trinkets" is a little silly. They're nothing
    other than "vanity items".

    So the writer of this article is upset that vanity items cost too much? Hello?

    Any disappointment on the part of players is a result of over-expectation
    in the 'freebie collectible' component of the offline game. I'm not sure that
    having one's un-researched expectations shattered by reality is something that warrants
    casting blame on the manufacturer.

    IMHO as long as we're talking about something that has no other purpose but to
    flaunt in front of other players and say "Na-ha, look what I have!", there's no
    'appropriate' price. As in the real world, vanity has no upper price limit.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:Vanity is Expensive by mblase · · Score: 1

      So the writer of this article is upset that vanity items cost too much? Hello?

      Listen, you have NO IDEA how much I had to pay for this Prada mousepad and Armani leather wrist rest so that I could play WoW in the sort of luxury I deserve. It's not like I have a lot of spare cash left over for my virtual accoutrements as well.

    2. Re:Vanity is Expensive by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > So the writer of this article is upset that vanity items cost too much?

      Not exactly his point. His point is that the cost of the vanity items is far out of line with what they do, and it was so unrealistic that it was an affront to common sense.

      > I'm not sure that having one's un-researched expectations shattered by reality is something that warrants casting blame on the manufacturer.

      Considering the venue I'd say that the only appropriate target for complaint is the manufacturer. Since complaining might (assuming enough complaints) get the manufacturer to drop the cost of the items, that's proper recourse. If lawsuits were involved I'd say it went too far, but expressing displeasure to the game maker for something like this is entirely proper.

      Virg

    3. Re:Vanity is Expensive by Macthorpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I'm concerned, the article invalidated it's own point and yours.

      There is outrage at how much these trinkets cost to get, and then they reveal that there's no competitive advantage to having one, which invalidates the pricing of them because they are vanity only.

      Let me qualify that. If they were 'forcing', by game mechanic or otherwise, subscribers to get these cards to get a nominal in-game advantage then I would agree wholeheartedly that allowing people to buy an advantage is creating an inherent divide between the wealthy players and the less wealthy. However, seeing as the items themselves are totally pointless and confer no advantage to the player, then why aren't they just treated as a bonus to people who want to collect the card game?

      Just because some Joe Nerd wants to spend this amount of money on cards to get a trinket that does nothing (like, say, spending an extra million bucks to get a diamond studded mobile phone instead of a plain plastic one) then why should anyone stop them? Just because it's a waste of their money, we have no obligation to complain at the manufacturer for selling something at a price which people will pay to get them.

      The other thing is, why are people pretending that this huge amount of money doesn't include a lot of trading cards with which you can play a different game entirely? It's like complaining to McDonalds that their Happy Meal toy costs the price of a Happy Meal.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    4. Re:Vanity is Expensive by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > As far as I'm concerned, the article invalidated it's own point and yours.

      Firstly, since the article is an opinion, it's not invalidated by disagreement. Second, my point is that the only proper target for complaints about WoW is Blizzard. Since this guy is grousing to Blizzard about the "values" oif the items, he's taking proper recourse.

      > It's like complaining to McDonalds that their Happy Meal toy costs the price of a Happy Meal.

      Why would that be inappropriate? Sure, it's likely that McDonald's will tell you that you're getting the Happy Meal too, but still they're the ones that should field complaints about Happy Meals. I agree that it was dumb to assume things about the points in the card packs. That wasn't my point, though. My point is that he should complain to Blizzard about it, where the parent of my post stated, "I'm not sure that having one's un-researched expectations shattered by reality is something that warrants casting blame on the manufacturer." That's not right. Shattering a preconceived notion is something to take up with a manufacturer.

      Virg

    5. Re:Vanity is Expensive by popo · · Score: 1


      > "His point is that the cost of the vanity items is far out of line with what they do, and it was so unrealistic that it was an affront to common sense."

      Thank you for the "utility-theory of value".

      Unfortunately the rest of the world disagrees with you.

      Useless baubles frequently have unlimited value.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    6. Re:Vanity is Expensive by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > Unfortunately the rest of the world disagrees with you.

      The part you're responding to is, "His point is that the cost of the vanity items is far out of line with what they do, and it was so unrealistic that it was an affront to common sense." I've done the favor of highlighting the part that's important here. I don't actually agree with him in that, but the parent to my post is attacking the wrong target.

      The salient point is simply that I think the parent to my post is wrong to say that complaining about the price is stupid. One must consider that this guy's bitching (along with the others who fell into this pit) has some nonzero chance of actually changing the point cost of some of the baubles, so even if we think he was dumb to buy in before he knew the score, he's not completely off his nut to complain about it.

      Virg

    7. Re:Vanity is Expensive by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      IMHO as long as we're talking about something that has no other purpose but to flaunt in front of other players and say "Na-ha, look what I have!", there's no 'appropriate' price.

      Never underestimate how far a WoW player will go just to have an item that allows them to go "Na-ha, look what I have!". There are faction grind fests that require repeating the same task 1000s of times just to a get a mount that looks slightly different from the normal ones, but conveys no other bonus.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    8. Re:Vanity is Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly his point. His point is that the cost of the vanity items is far out of line with what they do, and it was so unrealistic that it was an affront to common sense.

      They're vanity items, being expensive is what they do. Why do you think people buy diamonds?

  18. Is it just me that thinks the complaint is crazy? by Claws+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

    You bought the card game - don't complain that the free extras don't match up to your expectations. You're furious that you have to buy 20 meals to get a free pudding? I'd base my purchase on the quality and value of the meals, personally...

  19. Haha...seriously, HAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Blizzard pwning their fans man...nothing else. This is so they can go down to E3 or whatever and bloat : "haha...look here EA. Look what we did to those idiots. First they were angry of course, but look at them now! Haha! This one guy has ALL the trinkets! It must have cost him $10 000! Oh and I just bought myself my own spaceship too. Going to the moon next friday...u wanna come?"

    That original article writer really needs to take reality check. Why the hell buy cards for a game you don't want to play, ONLY because he wants some graphics to show up in Wow, and NOT check how much cards he needs before paying...haha...funny shit.

  20. what does any of that mean? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    I can honestly say I didn't understand a single sentence of this guy's post. Some of the words I knew (like "fiasco") but the rest of it ..... ?

    apparently he's upset about something to do with online gaming

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  21. WoW or AM? by nostriluu · · Score: 1

    That sounds a lot like Air Miles to me.

  22. The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are not paying for the points when you buy the cards... you are paying for the cards and the points are a BONUS... So saying that the in game items cost that much doesn't make sense. The cards and the points together cost that much...

    1. Re:The problem is... by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Blizzard knew putting points on the card packs for in-game items was the only way the cards would sell. And just like all their in-game methods for getting items, you have to do a whole lot for only a little reward.

      They could have easily altered the points required for rewards to a reasonable level. The fact that they chose not to is very despicable. Especially after touting the 'cool rewards' you'd be able to get while withholding the information on how many points you need, KNOWING that people would be buying the cards right away (for the points, not the cards).

      No, I myself did not buy any of these cards - I don't care enough about getting 'special' items in game. But it's the principle that matters, not whether I personally got screwed or not.

      Apparently Blizzard is really trying hard to kill the golden goose. They haven't quite got there yet, but it's definitely starting to bleed.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought cards to play, not for the points. The points are a little extra bonus, or I can just give or sell them to someone who wants something online.

      Incidentally, a representative for UDE mentioned that the current prices may still change.

  23. Dumb article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. The cards you buy are intended to be used to play a game with. The UDE points thing is just a bonus.
    2. I believe certain rare cards are also worth a certain amount of UDE points or can give the player a code to automatically get a free item. I'm not quite clear on this, but neither is the article.
    3. As the article said, the items you get from UDE points are complete novelty items in WoW. No epic weapons, no uber trinkets that will allow you to pwn in PvP. Think the stupid novelty pets you got in the Collector's Edition.

  24. spelling course by hachete · · Score: 1

    "Having been through the MtG additiction twice, I've decided staying away from this CCQ is a good idea."

    If the editors can't it right, who can? It's *addiction*/SpellingNazi

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    1. Re:spelling course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the editors can't it right, who can? It's *addiction*/SpellingNazi

      Where's a grammar nazi when you need one ....
    2. Re:spelling course by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Having been through the MtG additiction twice, I've decided staying away from this CCQ is a good idea."

      If the editors can't it right, who can?


      No no, I think it's a new word. An "additiction" is when you get so miserably hooked on it your face starts to twitch when you realize your dealer--sorry, the card manufacturers--has upped the price again.

    3. Re:spelling course by crossmr · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a nazi you might want to toss a "get" or "spell" into your sentence there.

  25. Oh... My... God... by iroll · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can we kill that which... has no life?

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    1. Re:Oh... My... God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, like, someone who trolls Slashdot comments with south park quotes?

    2. Re:Oh... My... God... by iroll · · Score: 1

      Nothing like a cup o' joe and some /. trolling to get the day started.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  26. Re:Is it just me that thinks the complaint is craz by PopeJM · · Score: 1

    I think it's more like having to buy 20 tv's to get a free dvd

  27. What were people expecting? by Broken+scope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do people complain about those little coke codes that you can redeem?

    Hell no, why? Because only an idiot goes out and buys the coke bottle just for the code. They code is a little reward for drinking the coke. Its not a consolation prize, it is a little reward for a bit of brand loyalty. Hell the rewards for the soda are less useful.

    God, what an ass. I'm gonna buy a ccq so i can win a freaking e-penis enhancement. Oh boy, I pay 15 bucks a month already, why don't I just bend over some more then bitch about it. You have not been kidnapped, you don't have a knife at your throat, DON'T BUY THE FUCKING CARD GAME YOU MORON, GOD DAMMIT ITS THAT SIMPLE. ITS ONLY A FIASCO IF YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON.



    cough. ahem. sorry.

    --
    You mad
    1. Re:What were people expecting? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Please, carry on - I'm just glad I'm not the only person who saw this and thought "Oh, who gives a fuck!?" Between trivia like this and FUD like the IE phishing filter story, I find myself wondering why I come here more and more often.

    2. Re:What were people expecting? by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Do people complain about those little coke codes that you can redeem?

      Unfortunately, yes they do. In fact, they're even trying to sue them! People will complain about anything.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    3. Re:What were people expecting? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Oh goody, my sleep deprived ranting haven't gotten me in trouble once again.

      --
      You mad
    4. Re:What were people expecting? by onion2k · · Score: 1

      The article states that the Fireworks trinket would cost you $900.00, and the Ogre trinket $2,100.00. From experience running a university gaming society back at the height of MtG's popularity I'd say that a $2100 collection is actually quite small. I've met people at gaming conventions with collections that must have cost them 10* that.

    5. Re:What were people expecting? by mblase · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I simply have to agree. The article starts with this comment:
      I, like many people that purchased the World of Warcraft Collectable Card Game, have no interest in playing the game. What we are after is the brilliant in-game promotional items stuffed into random packages
      So he's already admitted he's not buying the Collectible Card Game for the Game; he's only interested in the Collectible Cards.
      Want an Ogre trinket? No problem, it is only going to cost you $2,100.00. Bear in mind that these items are purely for show off purposes and give no in-game advantage to players.
      Well then, if they don't help you win the game and only offer you a bunch of "bling", why bother?

      I'll grant you, $2100 is a lot of cash for some bling. But complaining that fashion costs too much is a waste of time from the very beginning.
    6. Re:What were people expecting? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      How many of of those people played the game with those cards?

      --
      You mad
    7. Re:What were people expecting? by rpillala · · Score: 1

      You're my personal hero.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  28. Incredible by ChozSun · · Score: 1

    9 boxes of freakin' cards? Geez. Screw that.

    I was going to get a couple of packs and check the artwork at best.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
  29. Re:Is it just me that thinks the complaint is craz by Kookus · · Score: 1

    The prizes from the card game are a form of collectible themselves. It's akin to minting a new coin and throwing it into random boxes of cereal. Along with throwing coins in cereal you throw in a piece of paper that says: "Collect X amount of these and get a coin". Are you telling me that coin collector's everywhere are going to be buying that cereal to eat it?

  30. Hardcore players demand turtles by xsarpedonx · · Score: 1

    The CCG was released 5 days ago from today. I'm not certain when the UDE exchange prices were listed but it hardly qualifies as a "long time" between in my opinion.

    And also, the FAQ about UDE points, released October 2nd (weeks before the card game), uses 50,000 points as an example twice...that should have been some indication of the scope they were looking at.

  31. Blizzard is going to Sony by beldraen · · Score: 1

    I have been fearful of Blizzard for a while now, and now it seems my concerns are slowing being realized. I played SWG for 1.5 years since release. The urge to use the fans for money just became too tempting to resist. Things changed from "we want to provide you with fun," to "things will change and it is our game."

    With the change to the UI's to be locked down to the +healing nerf, Blizzard has now clearly stated that they know how the game is "supposed" to be played. The mods they disliked were written and heavily used for a reason. People do not like being used for a particular purpose (i.e. be the wack-a-mole'er). My greatest fear was the statement that Blizzard plans to release an expansion pack a year when there are plenty of mechanics in the game that would be far more interesting if the would routinely add to them. We already have a lot of factions that are unused. There are plenty of lower-level recipes, enchants, etc that could be added. In short, a lot of things that would add more richness to the world, but would not be an immediate selling point.

    And, that's the rub. It is far easier to add breadth than depth to a game. But, breadth is far more marketable. What made WoW popular was the depth. After all, once you max in any system, it's the replayability that keeps the people--the social environment. I think Blizzard no longer understand that.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    1. Re:Blizzard is going to Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WoW doesn't really have a social environment compared to most mmos. I know lots of people who despise each other but still work together to get loot. The constant of raid guilds is that the second someone leaves (quits the game, rerolls, whatever) they are dead to all their "friends". WoW is far too selfish a game to foster any sort of lasting community.



      I think this sort of move will become more and more common on Blizzard's part, the majority of their players are selfish and hateful people - so why not take em for every penny you can?

    2. Re:Blizzard is going to Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SWG started out as a crappy game. Sony has just been struggling to find a way to make it less crappy and keeps missing the nail. There is a reason Blizzard gives us seemingly fewer options with classes and trade skills... because doing otherwise things are confusing and impossible to balance to everyone but an uber hard core player. Giving players too many options is confusing to casual players. Sony learned this way too late. Comparing WoW to SWS is completely stupid at this point, when in reality Blizzard has overall IMPROVED WoW since launch.

      WoW has actually become more casual friendly over time, believe it or not.
      - 20 Man Instances (ZG and AQ20 are fairly casual friendly).
      - Tier 0.5.
      - Reputation rewards for Argent Dawn and Cenarion Circle that do not require raiding.
      - Cross Server BGs that allow you to get in a game very quickly.
      - World PvP tasks that make EPL and Silithus a bit more interesting.

      The expansion will make this even more so.
      - PvP rewards that you can work for at your own pace, while not worrying about rank decay.
      - No more 40-mans at all.
      - It seems there will be a greater focus on professions providing epic gear.
      - Token based loot systems for Tier 4.

      Anyhow, most healers who know what they are doing realize that the +healing thing needs to be changed for the expansion. It is getting to the point where mana is next to meaningless for a priest in top-end +healing gear. My wife's priest heals more with a single tick of renew rank 10 than my level 60 paladin in blues does with a flash of light spell (the paladin is, admittedly, not my main character). She can literally down rank her spells quite a bit, saving ungodly amounts of mana, and still keep people alive.

      Let's also look at the the hybrid classes. It seems that the expansion hopes to move them away from pure healing roles. The paladin is becoming more tank-like. The shaman is becoming more DPS-like. What addons is Blizzard seeking to eliminate anyway? Oh, the ones that basically make the game too easy (thus boring) for these classes and that further serve to pigeonhole them. Mods like decursive take the interaction and fun OUT of the game. They are going to be far less necessary in 25-man raids, and it seems that Blizzard intends decursing/cleansing to be much more "surgical" than before. Good players who don't rely on the crutch of addons have no problem with the removal of decursive.

      Blizzard has done things that add a bit of flavor to the game, BTW. In addition to new dungeons, quests, recipes, etc. there are also plenty of novelty events that occur on a regular basis, and once in a while there is a world event. (i.e. the Scourge Invasion). Where have you been?

    3. Re:Blizzard is going to Sony by RallyCheyenne · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but the old 40-man raids will still exist, there just won't be any new 40s. Not that there'll really be any point in going back and doing them (which is sad, since I hear Naxx has some of the most amazing raiding experiences).

    4. Re:Blizzard is going to Sony by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I agree with the +healing nerf in general.

      The reason so many people used decursive however was thanks to the large number of idiotic whack-a-mole mass-debuff fights that made playing any class that could debuff a huge pain. Ie, not a fun game to play. Unfortunately, some of Naxx's encounters were built assuming everyone was using decursive (because they were), meaning they'll be far more difficult than intended when decursive is disabled.

  32. Wow by tsstahl · · Score: 1

    I must be getting old; I didn't understand anything in the post. The linked article was much more informative, though.

  33. Let me summarise the "article"... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    "Waaaaah waaaaah waaaaaaah."

    Honestly, bunch of clowns get upset that some 'exclusive' in game items of zero real world value are going to take them more time and / or money to aquire than they would have liked.

    Cry me a river.

  34. What a mess by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

    Six million people may play Warcraft but leading a story with this gibberish isn't going to help the 5billion, 994million who don't understand what the hell you're on about man! In the word of Mr. T, "Fool!"

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
  35. This could very well be the end of the World by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... of Warcraft

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:This could very well be the end of the World by natx808 · · Score: 1

      World of Whiners?

  36. Poor me by ryanhos · · Score: 1

    I traded my real, hard-earned currency for an alternate currency before knowing just how much the alternate currency was worth! Poor me!"

    Hey, WOW players, shoelaces are the next gold. Twice as valuable per ounce! If you want to be rich, collect shoelaces. I have a million of them and I'll sell them to you for only $3 per shoelace. This is a hot deal, so act quickly before the London stock exchange begins tracking the daily shoelace price.

    --
    "I threw up my hands in disgust and wondered if it had been such a good idea to have eaten my hands in the first place."
  37. Fiasco? No, author = idiot. by DdJ · · Score: 1

    I bought precisely two decks of cards, so that if nobody I knew bought a deck, I'd still be able to play. That's it -- I don't anticipate buying any more.

    If you don't want to play the card game, don't buy any cards. If you buy them in order to get the in-game rewards, you are going to be disappointed. Period. Don't do that. Buy them to play the card game, not for any other reason.

  38. Something must be done! by vrar · · Score: 0

    Call Jack Thompson! Think of the children!

    --
    "What a depressingly stupid machine." - Marvin the Paranoid Android.
  39. QQ More by Qetu · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you expect to open a pack and get a fun trinket in game, what would stop every wow player to open just one pack and get it? Then it would not be special.

    - You get 100 points per pack.
    - You can get a nice amount of points in special tournaments (probably more than 100 points and less than 5000).
    - You can get omg lucky! and open an special Legendary Loot card. It gives you a code for a special reward in game. Turtle mounts are reaching some high prices...

    So this is more a problem of children crying GIEF NAO!

  40. Tournaments = points by Echo5ive · · Score: 1

    Or so I've been told by people who demo the card game.

    --
    Leveling up builds character.
  41. Caveat Emptor by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    It took me several months (and lots of persuasion from RL friends) to even spend the money on the game and the monthly fee, but I'll be damned if they'll get me to buy some useless card game just so I can get some useless pet that 1) does nothing, 2) takes up inventory space, and 3) ensures I can't enable any OTHER pet I've got wasting inventory space if I activate it.

    It's bad enough they make us do cartwheels for months to get adequate bag space (wtf buying a bank slot for 100g, when its just as much extra space as the 10s one, with NO free bag?)
    But now they're offering a card game (as if they don't already offer enough addictive stuff) that you can use to "get the edge" in WoW by having some useless thing follow you around, or a turtle mount that doesn't increase your speed or do anything more than just "look cool". A computer game, a card game, and now a table-top board game. Its obvious that Blizzard is milking the franchise for every penny they can get out of it, and good for them. It's paying off big time. I don't blame them at all, but I do think the enticement of useless in-game stuff for a serious amount of real money is ridiculous. I would just never buy it myself.

    1. Re:Caveat Emptor by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1
      It's bad enough they make us do cartwheels for months to get adequate bag space (wtf buying a bank slot for 100g, when its just as much extra space as the 10s one, with NO free bag?)

      Hey, Horde/Alliance law requires that the First Bank of WoW give you 24 slots of storage space for free. The bank is free to charge for any additional space you ask for. The catch is that the bank doesn't want to give you more space than that, so the more additional space you want, the more prohibitively expensive their charges become.

      Just be glad that there isn't a cost over time for it.

      P.S. The high end bags are either hard to get:
      Onyxia Hide Backpack - 40 man Raid
      Panther Hide Bag - 20 man Raid and it's unique... so you're limited to one per toon
      Supply Bag - Requires lots of Argent Dawn facrtion/turn-ins and it's unique

      or hard to make:
      Bottomless Bag - The Mooncloth alone takes 48 days of game time to make because of the 4 day forced delay between Mooncloth transmutations.

      It's the first time in the game where the bags have a higher value than bank slots.
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  42. A Minor Nit to Pick by virg_mattes · · Score: 0

    > Or maybe they really are just greedy bastards and know how to exploit the playerbase of the most popular game in the world.

    WoW isn't the most popular by a long shot. Take a look at the numbers for Lineage, and you'll see what I mean.

    Virg

    1. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by theghost · · Score: 4, Informative

      WoW isn't the most popular by a long shot. Take a look at the numbers for Lineage, and you'll see what I mean.

      Latest numbers from http://www.mmogchart.com/ put Lineage and Lineage II combined at about 3 million subscribers. WoW is at about 6.5 million and on their website they recently claimed to be over 7 million. That sounds like a pretty big lead to me.

      Ain't it a shame when facts get in the way of making a point? What was your point anyway?

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    2. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by An+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      From the Wikipedia:
      NCsoft has reported that Lineage had at one point more than four million subscribers, most of them in Korea ... Only World of Warcraft, with over 6 million active users, has a larger user base.

    3. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by virg_mattes · · Score: 1, Troll

      I stand corrected. I was working with older information. Now, since I did specify that it was a minor point, you might consider being more polite in the future, especially considering I didn't insult you directly. Instead of thinking more of you, I think less of you, even though you were right.

      Virg

    4. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by theghost · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think less of me. Oh the shame. Somehow i'll just have to try and pick up the pieces of my shattered life and go on. I'm sure it'll be a hollow shell of an existence, full of misery and regret, but maybe, just maybe, some day i can redeem myself and earn back your favor. Oh wait, nevermind. I cared there for a second, but i'm over it now.

      Welcome to the internet Virg. Bring along a sense of humor next time you visit.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    5. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 2

      Dude, you were wrong, he corrected you, and in a lot nicer way than most would have on /. Take a pill or something.

    6. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by theghost · · Score: 1

      What i really think is that it burns you up to have been publicly called-out for being wrong. Because of that you have to pick an issue to be right on and apparently that issue is politeness and decorum. I suppose we should just be thankful that it's not grammar and spelling.

      So in the interest of making you feel better about yourself: You win - you're right, i'm a dick. I will no longer go around correcting people and making snide comments. Congratulations and thanks for teaching me the lesson in manners i so desperately needed. You have singlehandedly made the world a better place. Bravo. Well done.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    7. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by smallguy78 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Of course you could've just put a link to the usage stats and left it there, saving us your pompous teenage comeback aimed somebody you have never met or will never meet. Welcome to the internet, it's full of teenagers.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    8. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      You make me wish I had mod points. Instead, I'll write this comment that sings your praises throughout the internets.

      Seriously, other dude had it coming.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    9. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You really are being an ass about this.

      I agree with his point- you can politely correct him and improve the world or you can be unpleasant.

      I guess you are enjoying being unpleasant.

      Your right I guess.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is interesting is that while WoW's stats on mmorpg.com indicate a meteoric increase in susbscription, it cannot compare for volume over time. Lineage has it beat there, at the moment.

      My suspicion is that the when the aggrandizement doesn't provide enough of a fix to the players in WoW, the coaster goes off the rails and the game poofs. The designers have this in mind explicitly from the get go.

      So while the chart may represent higher current totals, the likelihood of sustaining that population seems unlikely, given the nature of the game.

    11. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by theghost · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're right on both counts: i am being an ass and i am enjoying it.

      If you want to post off-topic pedantry that's fine, but when you post off-topic pedantry that's factually incorrect, you pretty much open yourself to a cheap shot or two. As far as public rebukes go, my first comment was pretty tame. At any rate what exactly was the point he was trying to make? If it's so minor as to be inconsequential, why bother picking that nit at all? If it's worth commenting, why isn't it worth doing the 30-seconds of research it would take to make sure you know what you're talking about?

      Read my third comment (http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=203485& cid=16642589) for why i chose to respond the way i did the second time. The first time he was just wrong, the second time he was just being a condescending prick.

      At any rate, i'd rather be a well-informed asshole than a polite idiot, even when it comes to discussing something as pointless as this, but that's just me. To each their own.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    12. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I prefer a well-informed person who is polite.

      I'd bet dollars to donuts that you would prefer it too when you are on the butt end of someone else being unpleasant. But who knows, maybe your some kind of masochist too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    13. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by theghost · · Score: 1

      Ooooh! Rebuke me again! I've been a naughty slashdotter!

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    14. Re:A Minor Nit to Pick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was he being impolite? He was just asking a question.

      Seriously, if you went on any MMO forum and stated that WoW didn't have the most subscribers by a long shot, you would have been torn to shreds. It's like going to a European country and announcing at a sports bar that football (soccer) isn't the most popular sport in the world, by a long shot. You just made a terrible first impression of your knowledge and your intelligence, and it's hard for anyone to respond to your comment in a positive manner.

  43. Link pls? by lsw · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tried to click on the [Axe of ZOMGWTF Pwnage] but doesn't work. can anyone link it so I can see the stats please?

    --
    Ironclad Security only exists when you have Chuck Norris on the shift. Do we really have to discuss this? (Plutonite)
    1. Re:Link pls? by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      (General)(alchemar) You can't link items in general chat, please go to the trade channel.

    2. Re:Link pls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Link pls? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      +25 strength<p>
      +25 stamina<p>
      Equip: All melee damage increased by 50%<p>

      This never made it out of beta. Apparently, there were a number incidents of hunters thinking it was a hunter weapon, and rolling need on it. The server crashed due to an excessive number of "Roll a damn warrior already!!!111" posts in the LookingForGroup channel.

    4. Re:Link pls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saw this in beta
      http://www.thottbot.com/beta?i=2343

      Mooncleaver
      Binds when picked up
      Unique
      Two-Hand Axe
      348 - 523 Damage Speed 3.80
      (114.6 damage per second)
      Durability 120 / 120
      Requires Level 70
      Requires Master Axesmith
      Equip: Improves critical strike rating by 48.
      Equip: Increases attack power by 98.

      GG

  44. WoW = Neopets by withears · · Score: 0

    Can I get a Pikachu too?

  45. Re:Is it just me that thinks the complaint is craz by Shrubber · · Score: 1
    You bought the card game - don't complain that the free extras don't match up to your expectations.

    You're right, sort of. A huge number of people are going to buy the card game *because* they announced you'd get special items inside World of Warcraft, not because they just want a card game. The people behind it know this, and count on it. It's a tie-in, a way to try to get people to try the card game that might not have otherwise. However it would also be naive, I think, to ignore the fact that there are some people who will buy cards with no intention of ever playing the card game just to get an item inside World of Warcraft. Make all the judgments you want about the person who would do that but it's going to happen.

    Somewhere out there someone read this article as a guideline and placed an order for the number of boxes of cards they need.
  46. Re:Is it just me that thinks the complaint is craz by Claws+Of+Doom · · Score: 1
    However it would also be naive, I think, to ignore the fact that there are some people who will buy cards with no intention of ever playing the card game just to get an item inside World of Warcraft.
    You're absolutely right. It's just those people wouldn't complain about it.
  47. Grind card decks??? by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Wow.. they actually brought the MMO grind to real life. Thats just disturbing.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:Grind card decks??? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      People have been doing that since collecting became popular for 20+ yaers now. Serious collectors have always just bought boxes and boxes of cards and tore through them looking for a certain card. This isn't a new phenomenon.

  48. Do your homework by truesaer · · Score: 1
    So if I understand this correctly, this guy bought a bunch of stuff he didn't want to earn reward points in a system he knew nothing about, and is now upset about it.


    Seems pretty stupid to pay cash for the cards without having any idea how many points are needed for the rewards.

  49. fury? by syle · · Score: 1
    When the UDE point system finally went live, I would imagine most of the people that logged in felt the same fury I did.
    I would imagine that if you feel fury about trading cards and video games, it may be time to re-examine your life.
    --

    /syle

    1. Re:fury? by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      That sentence you quoted sounds 100% like he was channelling 'Comic Book Guy.' Just put his voice to it and it sounds perfectly natural.

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    2. Re:fury? by Kookus · · Score: 1

      If you don't feel fury about anything that you feel is important to you, then I think you need to re-examine your life.

      Let's just tell those entomologists that have large collections to not feel any passion about man-made extinctions of certain species of insects, after all... they're only stupid bugs.

  50. CCG first, bonus second? by mmalove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A couple counter points to the article -

    First, I've known many many people who have spend over 1000 dollars on CCGs, most notably MTG. The extra tabard, the turtle mount, and whatever else is a bonus. It's not meant to be a grind, it's not meant to be the sole reason you spend 1000 dollars. The fact that people are willing to spend such an obscene amount of money for one, rather than leave it up to chance, is no more Blizzard's fault than it would be Sony's fault that people will buy playstations on Ebay for 3x the price just to get one 2 weeks early.

    Second, everything I've seen as a bonus from this is inconsequential in the game. The turtle mount isn't even epic, meaning you would still need a regular in game mount or everyone (your guildies, your battleground comrades, or that night elf you were chasing down) will outpace you. Vanity in game pets don't fight in combat, and most shape altering trinkets (this UPC item I'm sure included) don't fool guards or most players.

    Conclusion : The article's author confused a collectible card game with a lottery, and got teary when he didn't win. To quoth the WoW forums, "Cry more nub".

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  51. No Pity by InfinityWpi · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, you spent five bucks on a pack of cards, and expected there to be something -other- -than- the cards in that pack that was worth five bucks?

    Sorry, but IMHO, the original poster is an idiot. That's like complaining that you spent sixty bucks on a new 360 game, not to play it, but to use the CD as a mirror for shaving... but it's not shiny enough to shave with.

  52. WoW! by T.Louis · · Score: 1

    I honestly wish I came up with this idea! Captalism at it's finest! Can I get a "ca ching" anyone? Bwahahah!

  53. Give Me a Break by sfontain · · Score: 1

    This makes about as much sense as buying a sufficient quantity of cigarettes to get enough Marlboro Miles for a Harrier jet. Of course it's going to be hard. Of course it's going to be expensive. And of course you would be an idiot for trying to do this if you weren't going to smoke the cigarettes.

  54. Ahh, I get it now by gosand · · Score: 1
    Thank you for that recap, I really didn't understand what the story was talking about. Now that I understand...


    What a bunch of loser dorks! HAHA. Wow, really something to get bent out of shape about. Why don't you write some angry emails to the company, and get on some chat rooms and flame them? HAHA.


    I am sure this is only an issue for the dork-wannabes anyway. I am sure the true uber-dorks who play this game wouldn't bother with this. I don't know much about it, but from what I hear it reminds me of the other similar fads - D&D, Magic, Pokemon.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Ahh, I get it now by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I don't think D&D and MtG were/are fads. D&D has been around for what --- 30 years now? MtG came out in 1994, and is still the leading CCG.

  55. Don' t leave home without it... by Shipwack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's actually a pretty good idea, guy (not that I play WoW)... it'd be another revenue stream for Blizzard, and it'd give the players another way of getting points. IANAL, but I hope there is some way you could copyright (or whatever the proper legal phrase would be) that idea so you could get something if Blizzard ever does it.

  56. Seriously? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Anyone who gets pissed off about this stuff needs to reevaluate their priorities. The items are a nice little "thank you" from Blizzard to the people who play the CCG, not a deck of cards that you buy and get items. If you play the CCG, go for it, just don't expect an item card. I wouldn't buy the cards just in hopes of getting an item though.

  57. (Re:What will happen): But the thing is... by T.Louis · · Score: 1

    I guess it comes to honestly questioning the motives of the design choices of Blizzard? Having 7+ million people playing, and wanting to expand this even further (10+ million next christmas, or even more?) how it is going to affect design and content choices.

    Yes I'm aware it alread is, 40 man raids is the thing of the past in TBC expansion, and green/blue items level 64+ are close to what some of the lower end raid gear is (according to posts and screenshots from beta).

    But where will it end? How much influence does the finacial success and expectations have on the design choices? Are the designers and managers asking themselves: how can we design this so it will please our stockholders, make people addicted to our game, or do we base it on other things like loyalty to our customers etc?

    Ok ok, I know, a lot of questions, no answers.

    And a side note, I would never call WoW an MMO"RPG"... it is more of an MMO"RTS", or go as far as calling it a linear series of adventures with a few "pewpew" battlegrounds.

  58. Irrational Beings Are Predictable, Too by kthejoker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have $5 in your hand. Do you buy:

    a) A deck of WoW UDE cards - throwing away the cards and hording points for a system not yet in place to spend the points online?
    b) A video game rental?
    c) 5 Crispy Chicken Sandwiches from Wendy's (pre-tax)?
    d) A share in Ford (they're hovering right around that)?
    e) Some cheap headphones?
    f) A 1 gig flash drive from TigerDirect (after rebate)?
    g) 5 lotto tickets?
    h) 5 songs on iTunes?
    i) 40 songs on AllOfMp3?
    j) any other thing on this planet you can get for $5?

    Utility theory says that all of these are not equal to everyone. The major downside to spending the $5 is, of course, that you no longer have the $5, and the thing you have acquired may not be worth $5 to anyone else, so you can't always just "turn it back in" and magically get $5 again. It is that moment of choice which defines self utility. And frankly, people scarfing up these decks of cards placed an irrational (and needlessly high) value on these decks.

    It's like playing the lotto. Irrationality is predictable, too, because self-utility is not a rational thing, but it can be measured all the same. Good marketing people know this.

    1. Re:Irrational Beings Are Predictable, Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good argument, but a small correction if I may ..

      Utility theory says that all of these are not equal to everyone. The major downside to spending the $5 is, of course, that you no longer have the $5, and the thing you have acquired may not be worth $5 to anyone else, so you can't always just "turn it back in" and magically get $5 again. It is that moment of choice which defines self utility. And frankly, people scarfing up these decks of cards placed an irrational (and needlessly high) value on these decks.

      What you deem irrational and needlessly high may not be so irrational and high to others as you have pointed out previously.

    2. Re:Irrational Beings Are Predictable, Too by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      Utility isn't rational. It's about preference, which has no basis in rationality.

      Let's you say you need a new watch, and you have $50 to spend. (You won't need the $50 to pay your gas bill tomorrow or anything, so feel free to spend it all without consequence.) There are two watches available.

      Watch A is an ordinary digital watch. It's got some basic features, a cheap strap, and that's it. It's $20.

      Watch B is a much fancier watch - chronometer, altimeter, calculator, etc (but does it run Linux? - ed.). It's $50.

      Finally, let's assume that you don't *need* any of the functions of watch B (there are many other products where it's easy to differentiate beween necessity and non-necessity - computer graphics cards, for example - but bear with me here).

      So you can either have Watch A + $30 or Watch B. Which will you choose?

      Any choice you make is subjective and arbitrary. Since there is no true "rational" basis for making either decision (indeed, two different people could make very good arguments for either choice), economists invented "utility", which is a measurable concept of satisfaction. This concept, of course, being subjective and arbitrary - but the key word is measurable.

      Thus, you as the buyer have to say, "Will Watch B be the best way to spend the $30 I'd save by getting watch A?" So you think of how you might otherwise spend your $30 - maybe a new video game, or a date with your wife, or some nice slippers, or what*ever* - and you figure out how "happy" you'd be with your purchase. Rank every possible combination of purchases on a scale of 1 to 10, and then choose the highest one. (Notice: the "ranking" part is what makes these choices irrational. Of course, ranking this involves practical decisions - since I'm a Windows user, most Mac software products rank pretty low on my utility scale.)

      In this case, the point is these people ranked these cards higher than they should have - and while it's true they may have thought they were getting a better deal than they were, that's no excuse for spending your dollars prematurely. Just as if Watch B's altimeter could only round off to the nearest mile.

      And at the end of the day, your dollars are all you have in this scenario. The lesson? Don't buy products with a variable utility. In other words, make sure you know what you're buying. Caveat emptor. Old as civilization itself.

  59. Yei! by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    I'm extremely happy to announce that I can't understand a single word from the article OR comments!

  60. More info by bukowski01 · · Score: 1

    FYI - you also get points for playing in supported tournaments and such. You don't HAVE to buy packs to get the points for in game gear. However, they are trying to make $$$. Hats off to them for such an evil plan.

  61. Blizz hates casuals by BMonger · · Score: 1

    Clearly just another slap in the casual players face. The only way to get these items is if you're in a large raiding guild and help each other out.

    (in all seriousness it is rather steep... 250 boosters packs for fireworks or 500 boosters for an ogre costume? at least make some of the codes worth more than 100 points at random...)

    1. Re:Blizz hates casuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do the novelty items such as a regular speed turtle mount and a tabard have to do with raiding?

    2. Re:Blizz hates casuals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing...

          joke
      ---------
      your head

      ****Warning: Joke explanation below!*****

      Casual players usually complain that most content is geared towards 40 man raids (although soon to be 25 man) who can put in extensive time and effort. Similarly a single card purchaser is at a disadvantage to get UDE points as opposed to a group of people who could pool their points together...

  62. Re:Fiasco? No, author = idiot. by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

    Honestly, what hardcore WoW gamer is going to be bothered to play an offline card game based on WoW? Picture this: You are sitting in your local cybercafe or public library, deck in hand, and some guy walks in wearing a "For the Horde!" t-shirt. You say "Dude! Let's play the WoW card game!!" He smiles condescendingly, shakes his head and says "Dude..." while he pulls out his laptop and fires up WoW, logs in and proceeds to raid Naxx with his guild.

  63. Stats Padding by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

    With the way that accounts are handled in China/far east in general it's a bit inappropriate to say they have 7 million active user accounts. Those accounts are paid in a manner that keeps them always active whether the person plays it for 5 minutes and never plays again or plays continuously for years on end (as some of them apparently do).

    1. Re:Stats Padding by superrandomname · · Score: 1

      Any other facts you would like to talk about? Here is a clip from every Blizzard Press Release about their subscription numbers:

      "World of Warcraft customers include individuals who have paid a subscription fee or purchased a prepaid card to play World of Warcraft, as well as those who have purchased the installation box bundled with one free month access. Internet Game Room players that have accessed the game over the last seven days are also counted as customers. The above definition excludes all players under free promotional subscriptions, expired or cancelled subscriptions, and expired pre-paid cards. Customers in licensees' territories are defined along the same rules"

      Italicized for emphasis

  64. What fiasco? by mseeger · · Score: 1
    Hi,

    i ask myself "What fiasco?". I've never even heard about those trinkets. No player (i know of) has those Murlocs pe(s)t trinket. Nobody plays the trading card game. None of my WoW websites (i read about 5 per day) mentions neither the game nor the alleged fiasco. I think the topic is overblown.

    Regards, Martin

  65. Just think... by sBox · · Score: 1

    Too bad these developers/publishers do something good and offer points for a true good act, say like donating cycles to folding@home.

  66. Please get a grip of capitalism! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    I'm not qualified to comment of WoW or those people that play it - personally, I don't think it's worth the money but a few friends of mine do play it and pretty much enjoy it. Both "camps" are happy and that's all that matters.

    But please do NOT treat Blizzard (or Apple, Google, Microsoft, [INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE]) as a "benevolent charity" that primarily gives a damn about what you do or do not think is right or fair. All they care about is selling one or more products that as many people as possible will spend as much money on as possible so that pension funds, shareholders and a few fat cats get lots of money.

    If you're happy paying money for those products, then good luck to you. But once you've paid that money, please accept that those same companies will try to leverage a bit more money from you - this is no different to going into a store and getting the second item you pick up at half-price. It is JUST capitalism, nothing more.

    I have absolutely no idea what these cards do except that they sound like they give a small "boost" within WoW to those people who cannot be bothered to spend the time and energy to do it the "hard way" - so why has nobody complained about games companies running premium rate telephone lines for games cheats and hints for years? Surely it's the same thing and surely you can make a decision about whether or not to pay for those things.

    Some of you people SERIOUSLY need to stop getting so damned fanatical and blinkered about what is essentially just a past-time or a hobby - enjoy things for what they are and enjoy spending your hard-earned money. But sometimes just stop for a moment and remind yourself that in some parts of the world, people have enough of a problem finding money for food or for a roof over their heads.

    And just allow that fact to put a little perspective on what it is that you're moaning about.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Please get a grip of capitalism! by gsslay · · Score: 1
      Fair point, but you've got to understand something. Many WoW players are of the age where the world is full of authority figures. Their parents, their teachers, their boss. In their limited experience they think Blizzard fits in nicely with this. They're just another boss-guy getting in the way of the kids having fun. They have rules and stuff. Cue constant whining about everything Blizzard does being unfair, and they hate them.

      Unfortunately these kids haven't figured yet that Blizzard is not just like their parents or their teachers. They don't really care about them, and it isn't their job to look out for them, or pick up after them. Blizzard is a company in a free market economy. They only supply the game because they are paid to. So if anyone's the boss, it ain't Blizzard.

      But it's really amusing when they get all angsty about being done over by "the man Blizzard". Particularly when they've only themselves to blame.

  67. Players are REALLY pissed ONLY because... by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    Once you lose your job to this game, seeing another goal that can only be reached by spending money seems a bit unfair.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  68. TRUE... But not Catholic! by deft · · Score: 1

    "Complaining about this makes as much sense as being a devout Catholic and then getting all upset with the arbitrary rituals and limitations that come with the package."

    I'm not so sure...

    If you found out later the points didnt exist... that's Catholic.

    Finding out what you're looking for cost a shit load is Scientology.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  69. /cry more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo... don't buy them, idiot.

  70. card game addiction? hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having been through the MMORPG addiction twice, I've decided staying away from this Online Game is a good idea.

  71. I don't think that word means what you think it me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why exactly is this a Fiasco? Has the Collectitable Card Game from Upper Deck based on the Massive Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game, World of Warcraft by Blizzard (just to satisfy the whiners who don't know the abreviations used in a games site about games).

    Perhaps he meant Ripoff instead? He gives evidence of this, if this is indeed the way the point system works then yes it does seem that you need to spend a high amount on the CCQ to qualify for the online game reward.

    But to be a ripoff it it is necesarry for their to have been an element of deceit. Did either Blizzard or Upper Deck ever make it clear just how costly the UBE system was going to be?

    The simple fact is that most of these freebie systems are highly expensive. Get a free coke when you collected ten meal stamps. Oh woopie, first off you will often loose the ticket, you will forget to get a stamp and anyway the costs of a drink a neglicable especially considering that when you get your free drink you will probably still pay for other items.

    So what made people think this UBE system was going to be any different? Surely anyone with a brain would know that any free points system means you are going to pay through to nose for a freebie that isn't worth a penny?

    So again, did either Blizzard or Upper Deck ever represent this as anything different then all those other point systems?

    If they did, then it is a ripoff, if they did not then it is just another frequent flyer system. If because people don't fall for it, the game bombs, then and only then is it a Fiasco.

    An angry gamer who spend hard currency on worthless pieces of paper is not a Fiasco. That is smart business.

  72. Only morons would buy those cards anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upper Deck is actually making a smart play here. Since only idiots would ever buy collectible trading cards for a video game in the first place, they know only idiots would actually try to collect enough points to trade them in for a worthless trinket worth 2 cents. So it wouldn't matter if it were 8 million points, there would still be idiots trying to acquire them.

    Good for them!

  73. Who cares? by lewp · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, evil Blizzard is exploiting their poor addicted playerbase. How dare they, compelling these tortured souls to spend their hard-earned money on useless in-game items.

    Here's an idea! Don't buy them!

    Jesus Christ... I'm probably as much of a WoW addict as most anybody who reads /., but I'm not going to be blowing $900+ for an item, no matter how good it is. Nobody should be.

    If you do, and you're not so rich that it's just a joke for you to spend that kind of cash, then it's not that you have an addiction that your mean pushers are exploiting. It's that you're a moron, or you have some kind of major chemical imbalance that's probably fucking you in all sorts of other ways too. That's it. Plain and simple.

    Poopsock your time away all you want. Get HWL/GM 2-3 times. Raid Naxx until your eyes fall out. But don't blow your fucking mortgage payment on a video game. Show a little bit of intelligence, or at least the basic will to survive so you can keep playing your goddamn game.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  74. How did this 'Fiasco' warrant a slashdot story? by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    It's a collecting card game, you moron! The points aren't there to get you to buy the cards (the author admits he doesn't even play, he's buying just for the points), they are there to show appreciation for people that do buy the cards in order to play the card game! How did you possibly get it in your mind to buy collectible cards just to get points to spend on something you would get in WOW?

    If that is all you are after, consider checking EBay, where people that play the card game are selling point cards since they don't care about them. You may also try finding people that do play the card game, and offer them the cards that you are not interested in for their point cards which they don't care about.

    1. Re:How did this 'Fiasco' warrant a slashdot story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple. slashdot is for geeks/techies.

      this is a story concerning a subculture of geeks.

      slashdot readers will either a) laugh at the pathetic whines or b) complain. my money is more of a).

      why the hell these complaing kids cant just get into a bit of heroin is beyond me. i hear it affects your quality of life far less than WOW if you've got a bad enough addiction to whinge about trinkits.

  75. Wrong Pictures by dsaraujo · · Score: 1

    The pictures (second and third, not the first one) used in the article are not from World of Warcraft Colectible Carg Game, they're from the World of Warcraft Board Game, by Fantasy Flight Games. The board game is great, by the way.

    --
    Visit the RPG Search Engine
  76. Both are at fault here by Astarica · · Score: 1

    This would be like if someone camped out and buy boxes of McDonald fries to try to get a Broadwalk, only to find that the prize for Broadwalk is not announced until a week later and turned out to be only $1000. The wisdom of the buyer is questionable regardless of what the prize was but people should at least know what they're shooting for. In this case, they've nothing to base it on because the conversion system isn't announced. While the most logical thing to do would be to wait and see, I do think it's not asking too much to know what you should be expecting. If it is announced ahead of time it takes $2000 of cards to get trinket X then there's no one to blame but the buyer, but in this case it was not.

  77. They're not that hard to get, really by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, as usual people whine about it being to hard to get a useless item that they don't need. If you don't want to spend the money, don't get it! It isn't like some powerful item that only uber-raiders can get, it's a piece of crap that will make you look cool for two seconds.

    Besides, they're easy to get. I've almost got mine already.

    Sure, if you just buy enough cards off the Auction House, you'll have to spend 900-2000g to get the trinket, and of course that isn't worth it. Instead, just grind it out!

    The day after they patched the game to include the cards, I went to the Franklin Elementary Playground zone during lunch. The weak mobs there were dropping packs of cards pretty often, and other loot besides. Plus they have a really hilarious crying emote they do when you hit them. The "Save me mommy!" one was the best; keep at it until you hear it, trust me! After an hour the mobs stopped spawning, but I came back later and there were big crowds of them all lined up in front of where the big yellow tram comes. I must have taken out a hundred of them in like fifteen minutes. A few tougher mobs aggroed from the trams, though, so be warned.

    All told in about an hour and a half of grinding, plus travel time, I got a total of 10k points towards my ogre trinket, a few g worth of cash, a Nintendo DS Lite and a Nintendo DS (strangely the Lite sold for more on the AH even though it is white and the DS is blue... go figure). Compared to most of the semi-worthless things you grind for in WoW this is easy, so those complaining about the price should just STFU.

    One more note... I know this is probably just the Random Number Generator screwing with me, but I went back to Franklin the next day and it seemed like nobody was dropping WoW cards any more. So I left and went to Washington Middle School nearby. The mobs were a little harder, but still pretty easy and they droppped more cash and the WoW cards to boot.

    Uh oh, gotta go, the My Boss elite is patrolling this way.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:They're not that hard to get, really by lymang · · Score: 1

      Very funny!

      --
      Meh.
  78. Pretty Much Irrelevant by spoonboy42 · · Score: 1

    If somebody wants to spend that much cash to get an in-game trinket, one which has NO EFFECT on gameplay, I say let them. If you really want fireworks, you can go buy some for about 20 copper each in tinker town, and if you buy gold (shame on you) and stay logged in 24 hours a day, just buying and launching fireworks, I doubt you'll ever get to the point where it's worth your money to get the fireworks trinket.

    As for the other two items (the one which disguises you as an ogre and the turtle mount), they also have no effect on gameplay (riding the turtle is actually no faster than running on foot). They might possibly work into your roleplay stories, but there are a plethora of items already in-game that are probably more interesting for that purpose, like all the hollow's end costumes that you can get for free right now by talking to any innkeeper and saying "trick or treat".

    This would be a very different matter if the cards conferred special armor or weapons, especially if they were of epic quality. That would be breaking the game such that the greatest rewards no longer result from effort, skill, and teamwork, but from real-world cash. And THAT would suck. As it stands, if I see someone riding a turtle through Ironforge, I'll just say "hey, neat" and hop on the gryphon to head to another raid.

    --
    Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
    Andy Grove: "Not Much."
  79. City of Heroes players should take note by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    Any CoH player who might have complained about having to pay $10 for an on-line code or $15 ($30 less one $15 month of game time) to get a couple of spiffy powers which are in-game useful, plus a few new costume pieces for their outfits, should take note of this.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  80. Good to know by Malakusen · · Score: 1

    Glad I found this out before wasting money on the card game. If I want a good CCG based on an MMORPG, I've got more then a few bad ass City of Heroes decks, with Statesman and Pyrxiah and so forth. That stuff was actually a good deal.

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  81. You might as well check out something, well....fun by kayser_soze · · Score: 1

    Like the subject says...I personally don't find WoW to be fun in the least. In fact, I actually enjoy more hearing my friends who play tell me about what they did in the game than actually playing it.

    Instead, if you like Card Collecting Games (CCGs) and like to use your brain (even if it's just occasionally) go ahead and try PoxNora: http://www.poxnora.com/. This game is tons of fun, you can play for free to start, and many people have become ranked players just on the starter decks. If you like it from there, you can buy cards and get serious about it.

    The game was also covered in a previous /. story liked here: http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/10/13/ 1320246

    I am not employed by Octopi, I'm just a happy gamer that's finally found an online game worth playing. Come find me on there, and we'll play a round or two.

    [C]

  82. Speaking as a card collector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem buying more than one box of cards to try to make a complete set. I don't play the card games, but I like to collect the cards. In the past for other games/sets, I've purchased as many as 6 boxes just to get missing ultra-rare cards (or cards that I could trade for the missing cards). But the point requirement that Upper Deck has put on these point award items is beyond rediculous. I do think it would be nice to be able to get some of these rewards, but even as a relatively hard-core collector like myself, I'm not going to buy more than a half-dozen boxes. Casual collectors and people without large disposable incomes aren't going to be able to afford nearly that many. With such an unreasonable goal for the fun items, there's no motivation for people to try to collect the points. If it had been up to me, I would have made the tabard 2500 points (without any other requirement), the fireworks trinket 5000, and the Ogre trinket 10,000. Then you could get the base item after a single box of boosters and the starter, the medium-level trinket after two boxes of boosters and a couple of packs, and the really nice trinket after 4+ boxes (about $400+, not a totally unreasonable amount to spend on cards if you're a collector, and yet still makes it a much more expensive goal). No one except dealers and resellers are going to spend $2000+ on a single TCG. I think as a marketing tool, it's a very poor incentive for the averaage player/collector.

  83. Pics in the article are from the board game by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one wondering why the original article was posted with pictures from the board game instead of the CCG? Actually, I was more upset that the current list of redeemable items doesn't have anything usable for the CCG - currently t's just on-line game trinkets and wallpaper. Link to available items: http://entertainment.upperdeck.com/points/store/c- 11-new.aspx

  84. Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by bdrago · · Score: 2, Informative

    The UDE reward points in the World of Warcraft TCG were intended to be a reward for players - not a reason to drive sales. They're simply a "bonus" that can be redeemed for not only items in the WoW online game, but also for physical items like deck boxes, playmats, token cards, etc. However, we understand that we didn't do the best job communicating our intent, so as of Monday morning we've announced that we're cutting the points required to obtain the trinkets in half, and eliminating the threshold for the tabard.

    A pack of cards, containing 100 points, sells for $5.00, while an entire box, containing 24 packs or 2400 points, costs around $100.00. UDE lists the in-game fireworks trinket at 20,000 points and the ogre trinket at a whopping 50,000 points. The talbard, which sells for a "reasonable" 2,500 points, actually requires an account of points worth 25,000, placing it in the same price bracket as the other trinkets.

    The article's math is a little off. The MSRP for a booster pack is $3.89, so a box of 24 packs retails for $93.36. Most game stores sell boxes at a discount, and if you poke around online or on eBay you can find them as low as $60. With the new costs announced today, you can accumulate enough points for the fireworks trinket by spending $389 at retail, or about $250 if you order online. The Ogre trinket will cost about $625 if you bought boxes just for the reward points.

    The article glosses over the fact that alongside the UDE points, you're also getting cards to, you know, actually play the game. You end up with at least 250 Rare/Epic and 750 Uncommon cards which all have a value on the secondary market, and looking at prices one week out from release things are looking pretty good. If you just want the UDE points, then take your cards to a game store or put them on eBay, and you can recoup a large amount of the money you spent on cards originally.

    Honestly though, you should just give the game a chance. It's the best TCG to be released in the last 10 years, and does a good job being honest to the online game. If anyone at a recognized website or print publication wants some product to review the actual gameplay, please send me a message and I'll get some out to you this week.

    Cheers,
    Ben
    --
    Ben Drago
    Organized Play
    Upper Deck Entertainment

    1. Re:Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by kmhebert · · Score: 1

      So I can get a worthless Ogre trinket for a MERE $625? You have got to be kidding. A fool and his money are soon parted. Owning an ogre trinket is no different from wearing an "I'm An Idiot" t-shirt -- which, if you want one, I can sell to you for a mere $625.

      --
      Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    2. Re:Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by bdrago · · Score: 1

      Technically, you have $625 worth of cards for a pretty awesome TCG and a free Ogre trinket that you can use or sell on eBay. You really can't argue with eBay - search completed auctions for 'murloc pet' and you'll see they sell for $500-700 like this one.

      Personally, I'd get divorced if I spent that much money on a pet. I don't understand antiquing myself - why spend thousands of dollars on old furniture that's uncomfortable and too fragile to use? But I don't get worked up about what people choose to spend their own money on. :)

    3. Re:Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by bynary · · Score: 1

      Our local game shop has been selling out of WOW CCG stuff. A started set that would normally sell for around $16.00 is selling for about $35.00. YMMV.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    4. Re:Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by draxbear · · Score: 1

      Lemme get this straight, you're earning Frequent Flyer points buying cards which can be cashed in for (among other RL things) trinkets in Wow.

      What's the problem? Why are these so "must have" in Wow? They're essentially a freebie in cornflakes if you tear off and send in enough box lids. Better still some people are interested in buying these off you.

      I could understand the fuss if they provided a decisive in game benefit and the only way to get em was this...do they?

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    5. Re:Doing the math (Was: Re:What will happen) by Morlark · · Score: 1
      What's the problem?

      As far as I can see, the only problem here is the same age old one that we've always faced: People are stupid. People are stupid, so when one troublemaker decides they want to kick up a storm over nothing, you get a whole crowd of them (most of whom won't know or care about the issue at hand, and absolutely none of whom will have actually done any research into the matter) screaming bloody murder. This entire thing is just a non-issue.

      It's exactly as you say: Just a free little thing to reward those who decide to play this TCG. It certainly doesn't provide any decisive benefit.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
  85. Worst. Offer. Ever by giafly · · Score: 1
    "I would imagine most of the people that logged in felt the same fury I did"
    Youn name is Jeff Albertson and I claim my five dollars.
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
  86. Secret Prizes by selex · · Score: 1


    I bought a pack and got a god damn crappy Golden Ticket!
    It said:
    1. If you are a fat kid, WoW probably are, I saw that South Park.
    2. You have way too much time on your hands, probably since you're bitching about freebies.
    3. You have no life, thats a given for WoW.

    Then you can claim your special prize.

    Damn you Willy Wonka chocolate isn't worth crap in WoW...oh wait it might be.

    Selex

  87. Money, go figure by pkcs11 · · Score: 0

    How odd, a for-profit company is interested in getting money?!

    --
    "I have an odd craving to whisper about those few frightful hours in that ill-rumored and evilly shadowed seaport of dea
  88. Warcraft category by zizzo · · Score: 1

    Why isn't there a Warcraft category on /. yet? I would love to not see any WoW related posts. Ever.

  89. Not the true cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A local store near me offers to buy the UDE cards from people who buy packs in the store for 25 if they open them in store. They turn around and sell them for $5 for 10 cards. So yeah this will cost you $125 with this method but Blizzard knew full well it would happen.

    For people who want to play the card game, the cards are pointless bits of paper. Some feel it simply takes too many, etc. Whatever the reason the actual costs of these items is FAR FAR lower than the retail. Check ebay, the average cost per card is around 50 and I've even seen auctions for 25,000 points go for $115. A far cry from $2100.00

  90. This is just part of a quest... by angelasmark · · Score: 1

    This is all part of a quest to get the sword of a thousand truths... You must prove to Blizzard that you have absolutely no life.

  91. Ahh! by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

    Wow, just reading that third paragraph made me feel immense relief that somehow, human society just might not be as doomed as I thought.

    --
    Yup...
  92. The article is ridiculous. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    The article is ridiculous enough, but to add humor value, They used card images from the board game, not the actual CCG.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  93. Free? by Rix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I'd like 50,000 free points, then.

  94. And you are somehow *entitled* to one? by dircha · · Score: 1

    Boy does Blizzard ever have you by the balls.

    I think they should have given better odds of getting prizes, just enough so that, say, spending $100 or $200 on cards would likely get you something. Why? Because people like you would pay for it. The more money Blizzard gets, the more they have available to reinvest in R&D. And if you can't resist the "gotta catch 'em all urge", you probably deserve to be milked like this.

    There were already many examples of items in WoW that could no longer be obtained. And there are many more examples of items that 99% of players will never obtain eventhough they could if they spent a year or more raiding.

    I mean, don't you think it's a little pathetic that you as a grown man are whining about this?

    It's like a tax on idiocy.

  95. What a whiner -- and a stupid one too. by Invidious · · Score: 1

    If he were smart, he'd trade the better cards to other players, who're less intersted in the trinkets, for the points they've accumulated.

  96. Confused.... (common for me) by tprime · · Score: 1

    I don't play any MMOs, so please excuse this question if it makes no sense. I am confused as to why people who spend exhorbant amounts of real money to get cards to get stuff in games are OK, while people who just outright buy those things (or ingame currency to buy things) on eBay are considered the scum of the earth.

    It seems like if you are taking the 'high' road and earning all of your stuff, then getting an object through a WoWCard is not that different from just paying realworld $$ outright.

    Please help me to understand. To me it appears that the people who just go out and eBay buy their loot are more efficient than the people who buy 20 or so boxes of the cards to get something similar.

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com