Slashdot Mirror


Japan to Start Fingerprinting Foreign Travelers

rabiddeity writes "If you're planning to visit Japan sometime in the near future, you should be aware of the welcome you'll get. Last year, Japan's parliament passed a measure requiring foreigners to submit their fingerprints when entering the country. The measures, which apply to all foreigners over 16 regardless of visa status, take effect tomorrow. The worst part: the fingerprints are stored in a national database for an "unspecified time", and will be made available to both domestic police and foreign governments."

520 comments

  1. New Travel Destination by Ghoser777 · · Score: 0

    Since I won't want to go to Japan anytime soon, any other suggestions for Asian or Pacific countries to visit?

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:New Travel Destination by dippitydoo · · Score: 0

      CHINA!

    2. Re:New Travel Destination by wish+bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Welcome to the rest of the world's dilemma if we want to even transit through the USA. I've avoided it for the past...3, 4(?) years exactly for this reason. I wouldn't be surprised if Japan is doing this kind of as a big 'FU' to the States.

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    3. Re:New Travel Destination by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Korea is like Japan's younger sister. Just don't let any of either party hear you say that. :)

    4. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore.

    5. Re:New Travel Destination by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      Isn't Japan doing this to all foreigners, not just those from the US?

    6. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ;-) That'll piss off both parties, guaranteed! ;-)

    7. Re:New Travel Destination by Iftekhar25 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd recommend Singapore, where I live, but they've got my fingerprint here too. I'm not a Singaporean national; they took my thumb print back in 2006 when I was a fresh graduate from university, applying for a work permit. They have a national ID card system for their nationals and permanent residents, though. And it's linked to nearly everything.

      Back in Bangladesh, where I'm originally from, they're implementing a national ID card system. To wide public support, btw.

      In the Middle East (United Arab Emirates) where I grew up, they've been keeping foreign workers' passports under lock & key of their employers for the longest time, and issuing an ID card for foreign workers (the majority of their resident population).

      Most expatriates living and working in these countries have been stomaching this stuff for generations now. The general rule is keep your nose out of trouble and no trouble will come to you.

    8. Re:New Travel Destination by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't be surprised if Japan is doing this kind of as a big 'FU' to the States.
      Actually, I'd imagine this is a wetdream come true to those in the U.S. who pushed for the patriot act. Did you not read the line: "will be made available to both domestic police and foreign governments."

      Now the U.S. will have access to fingerprints of US citizens who travel to Japan without ever having to lift a finger. I'm sure they will push for all other governments to start doing this -- where upon anyone who ever traveled outside this country will be fingerprinted by others and all of it put into some worldwide database.

      I'm sure Bush is going to give his thanks to the Japanese Prime Minister one of these days.
    9. Re:New Travel Destination by JediLow · · Score: 1

      Privacy wise - Singapore's one of the worst places to go... which is why I'm so glad I got out of NS because I became a naturalized US citizen.

    10. Re:New Travel Destination by iamacat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And what is exactly a big deal? How will CIA/whomever will use fingerprint evidence on US citizens from Japan? Unlike RFID, fingerprints can not be automatically scanned en masse from remote. You have to first detect a suspicious activity at a particular small, private location and only then it can be dusted for fingerprints. The activity at the location has to be unquestionably illegal. One can not deduce the content of your conversation with a decedent just by presence of your fingerprint in his apartment. On the other hand, a dead body is a valid cause to question all recent visitors.

      I am more worried about California fasttrack lane and red light cameras than about this law. Unlike fingerprints, images of license plates can be easily OCRed and establish a very detailed profile of everyone's hour-by-hour whereabouts.

    11. Re:New Travel Destination by likes2comment · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Brazil started doing this when the US announced it was doing it to all visitors a couple of years ago. It surprised me to see that it has taken other countries so long to start doing this too. What goes around comes around. We do it to the world, then the world will do it to us.

      This also applies to torture and other interogation techniques like "water boarding" for captured soldiers. In the future our military personal should expect to have the same treatment that we are giving others with water boarding, etc.

    12. Re:New Travel Destination by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whereas I'm just one of these crazy people who think they shouldn't have to show ID to travel.. even internationally.. let alone give fingerprints and have my picture taken.

      Never forget that your government owns you.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:New Travel Destination by rve · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US has been taking finger prints and pictures of all foreigners entering the US since 2001 or 2002.

      For the Visa waiver program, I also need to fill out a form every time asking whether I am a nazi, have any infectious diseases or have the intention to commit terrorist acts.

      It also warns you that 1f you check 'yes' to any of those questions, you may be denied entry to the united states :)

    14. Re:New Travel Destination by chitokutai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This policy is TOTALLY the opposite of what the parent wrote. The reason they are doing this is because under the guise of terrorism they are attempting to reduce the number of crimes committed by foreigners, including overstaying visas. The whole idea of terrorism has nothing to do with why they passed this policy.

      The worst part of the government's shortsightedness is that A)They have take the policy of fingerprinting to new extremes (even more so than the US), fingerprinting EVERYONE including those with spousal visas and those with families in Japan, and B)there is no transparency at all in this whole process. There is a lot of talk that in order to become better friends with the US they will even be sharing fingerprint information while at the same time using the US 'terrorist' list to analyze people coming into Japan as well.

      See for yourself how they are trying to convince foreigners living in Japan that this is not a violation of your privacy - "It's to fight terrorism". They have included videos on the immigration page:
      http://nettv.gov-online.go.jp/channel.html?c=61
      Look for the June 14th entry. Notice how the foreigners look angry in the beginning, but once they have it explained to them that it's for their 'safety' that everything becomes alright.

    15. Re:New Travel Destination by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Just curious what sort of visa are you required to do this? I have to have a passport to enter the US from Canada, but that's it. is this for non North American countries?

    16. Re:New Travel Destination by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean? My government is precisely the government that is the least interested in what I'm doing and where I'm going, it's all the other governments that keenly inspect my IDs and credentials.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    17. Re:New Travel Destination by cuantar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you checked 'yes' next to 'intention to commit terrorist acts,' would they arrest you or laugh and let you through?

      --
      Legalize it.
    18. Re:New Travel Destination by rve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I don't see how this is different from US policy. EVERYONE who wants to enter the US legally with something other than a US passport is fingerprinted and photographed. There is no separate line for people with spousal visas or long term residents with a green card.

    19. Re:New Travel Destination by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Japan doesn't care whether the foreigners are upset; indeed, most Japanese would be all warm and fuzzy inside if all of the foreign residents went 'home.' Tourists are okay, as long as they don't break anything and go away soon. Foreign invaders who start families? Not so much.

      --
      Legalize it.
    20. Re:New Travel Destination by chitokutai · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      The checks are similar to the "US Visit" system introduced in the United States after the attacks on September 11, 2001. But Japan, unlike the United States, will require resident foreigners as well as visitors to be fingerprinted and photographed every time they re-enter the country. Perhaps I should have included repeatedly, but either way it's a terrible policy. Not to mention that we actually have to pay money to get a special stamp that allows us to leave and re-enter the country. This stamp now officially has zero meaning and simply becomes a visa tax targeted only at non-tourist visas.
    21. Re:New Travel Destination by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is I reconsidered going to the states to do some holiday shopping for the same reason (fingerprinting). While I have nothing to hide, I have never been fingerprinted and am hesitant to let another government have my fingerprints when my own government doesn't have a copy.

      The good news for americans is that (to the best of my knowledge) canada hasn't caught onto this trend.. yet.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    22. Re:New Travel Destination by rve · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is incredibly unwise to try to joke around with these people!

      A guy I know gave a silly answer to the question 'what is the reason for your visit?', and was held up for interrogation for several hours.

    23. Re:New Travel Destination by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      OK, maybe I am missing something here, but I really don't get what the issue is here. Sure it is kind of annoying to have your fingerprints taken. First of all, it's not like your fingerprints are hard to find, if someone wants to find them. So what? Is there anyone who really cares that much what I've touched?
      Secondly, it's not like you have any privacy at all when you are traveling to a foreign country. You have to give them your passport. Your passport tells them exactly who you are. So why do you object to fingerprints but not to passports? If you also object to passports on privacy grounds, then you are probably paranoid to the point of being out of touch with reality.
      Seriously, what is the issue here?

      --
      Qxe4
    24. Re:New Travel Destination by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Since when is it illegal to be a nazi?

    25. Re:New Travel Destination by lendude · · Score: 3, Informative
      Here's some info on the program - it basically allows persons from a number of countries to enter the US for periods of up to 90 days without getting a visa:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_Waiver_Program

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    26. Re:New Travel Destination by rve · · Score: 1

      I was fingerprinted and photographed again upon re-entering the US after a 2 hour stay in Canada.

      The questionnaire is for the Visa waiver program.

    27. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia!

    28. Re:New Travel Destination by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      And what credentials give you the right to speak on behalf of Japan in this way?

      --
      Jeremy
    29. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived there for a year. That's the attitude toward gaijin by most of the (especially older) population, however covert it may be. Trust me, this isn't a product of my imagination.

    30. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Little sister," if the big sister colonized the little one and committed various atrocities for 40 years.

      Yeesh.

    31. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go to the engineering department of any college.

    32. Re:New Travel Destination by Dahamma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when has Homeland Security used the LAW to detain, deport, investigate, or refuse entry the US?

      Actually... I wouldn't be surprised if it was illegal in some states. In the 1950's in some states it was not only illegal to be a Communist, it was illegal to discuss Communism or even talk to a Communist. Amazing...

    33. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an american citizen I'm of much the same opinion. Moreover if they're willing to trade them on back to my country of origin (They don't have a copy and hell if I'm going to either give them one, or give them a reason to come knocking for one.)

      Not a lot of personal info you can keep personal anymore, but no reason to make it easy for anyone to get ahold of.

    34. Re:New Travel Destination by vranash · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a plot for Japanese Lesbian porn :)

    35. Re:New Travel Destination by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      Brazil started doing this when the US announced it was doing it to all visitors a couple of years ago. It surprised me to see that it has taken other countries so long to start doing this too. What goes around comes around. We do it to the world, then the world will do it to us.

      They're not just doing it to US citizens. They're doing it to everyone. That's not pay-back; that's me-too.
      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    36. Re:New Travel Destination by davidfromoz · · Score: 1

      Those of you who don't live in Japan might not be aware that as this rule is about to go into effect there has also been a large increase in random inspection of foreigner's immigration documents in Japan (Alien Registration Card).

      Japan has never needed much encouragement to associate criminal behavior with foreigners. But I think in this case of fingerprinting we have the USA to thank. Its been almost satisfying to hear my American friends squealing about this. But not quite, two wrongs don't make a right and in any case, I lose twice now once now.

      Back on track.... Anybody who thinks that this information won't be swapped backwards and forwards between countries is a moron. At some point a lot of this information will find its way into a common database.

      cheers,
      David

    37. Re:New Travel Destination by caranha · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if Japan is doing this kind of as a big 'FU' to the States. Keep dreaming. It is the other way around. Japan is doing this partially due to pressure from our american overlords. All the "we are scared of terrorists too! See what they did in america/londom/madrid" FUD is around here in the informations about the new measure.

      Nevermind most (and the biggest) terrorist attacks in Japan were commited by natives (Sarin Gas attack, etc).
    38. Re:New Travel Destination by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It also warns you that 1f you check 'yes' to any of those questions, you may be denied entry to the united states :)
      Does it still end with the question asking if you answered the others truthfully? You know, just to catch out any real criminal masterminds.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    39. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do all assume that this is about the US?

      most foreigners living here that will be affected are not Americans.

    40. Re:New Travel Destination by Ours · · Score: 1

      Singapore? The fascist city-state? Yeah, great privacy and freedom there. Just don't throw your gum on the floor or you'll get your lashed.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    41. Re:New Travel Destination by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Seconded... been there for 4 year...

      Mostly xenophobic borderline illiterate inbred with rice farmers mentality, most of them only have TV as cultural education but will never miss an occasion to lecture you about anything always starting to yap their rubbish with "We Japanese...".
      My view might be a little biased as I'm mostly in contact with doctors or scientifics. Maybe people in other profession are more enlightened, smarter or cosmopolitan... The Island os like a cultural and fashion dumpster. Anything can be sold as long as it's marketed as being the latest fashion in Paris or New York, since nobody will check, It will sell like hotcakes.
      Also don't hope to find anybody speaking another language, be it english, german, french or brazilian (despite the huge community working for Toyota).

      Their motto seems to be "only foreigner commit cries in japan, no foreigners, no crimes"

      It start to get really old... before the end of the first week...

    42. Re:New Travel Destination by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They probably get that three times a day. Not going to get much laughs out of that anymore.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    43. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is it illegal to be a nazi?

      They don't ask whether you support National Socialism, they ask whether you were a member of the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany (i.e., the Nazi Party) during WW2.
      That does make some sense, many Nazis left Germany for hiding after the war, to avoid persecution. That way, you could easily kick them out because they lied at immigration. Much easier than the normal extradition process.

    44. Re:New Travel Destination by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "This also applies to torture and other interogation techniques like "water boarding" for captured soldiers. In the future our military personal should expect to have the same treatment that we are giving others with water boarding, etc."

      As opposed to being videotaped as they get their head sawed off?

    45. Re:New Travel Destination by phillips321 · · Score: 1

      any good idea on what the actual answer was?

    46. Re:New Travel Destination by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Considering this is Japan, it's probably more like the big brother raping the little sister in ways human anatomy shouldn't allow.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    47. Re:New Travel Destination by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is an international trade in fingerprints captured at border crossings - so if you get fingerprinted at a US Customs post then they'll be shared with the merry US/UK/CAN/AUS/NZ bunch (at least). I'm unsure how normal data protection laws apply in customs...

      The thing I would say to potential travellers is that Narita Airport (the major hub airport some 90km from Tokyo) has enormously bureaucratic customs provision for gaijin. Last time I transited in 2002 for an overnight stay (no fingerprints back then) it took the best part of 4.5 hours to get through the non-residents queue. It seems it is the only function in the whole of Japan that is not super-efficient.

      rd
    48. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is incredibly unwise to try to joke around with these people!

      Indeed. They also suffer from a lack of logic, IMHO.

      I asked as I was photographed and fingerprinted (yet again) when entering the USofA, why they just didn't use the details from the last visit and I got the answer "so that we can check you are who you say you are". Errr! Doesn't that assume that the passport wasn't a forgery on the first entrance?

      Even better... With the Visa waiver, the officials put a little green slip in your passport that you surrender as you leave, so that they have a record of the fact. Except that a friend mentioned that at some airports they have some self-service machines so that you can do it but these are before you go through customs. Can anyone else see the gaping flaw in that?

    49. Re:New Travel Destination by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what we should do is all answer yes ans swarm them with false positives. And on the other upside, we will not be able to enter the US.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    50. Re:New Travel Destination by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they ask whether you were a member of the National Socialist Workers Party of Germany (i.e., the Nazi Party) during WW2.

      Thus amply demonstrating the lack of logic. I'm 33. World War II happened almost twice my age ago. How on earth would I ever be a member of the Nazi party? Time travel?

    51. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brasil only did it to US citizens. Too bad they stopped.

    52. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Post your fingerprints, DOB, SSN and photograph on Facebook,
      and we'll show you.

      A fingerprint lifted from a public place is worthless. Get a
      fingerprint with the name & address of the owner and you can
      fuck them over hard.

    53. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, sis! Let's play doctor!

    54. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roll on the A380 so we have enough range to fly around the USA. Vancouver-Sydney/Auckland direct would be such a benefit.

    55. Re:New Travel Destination by ephesus · · Score: 1

      I just got back from Brazil and I wasn't fingerprinted, i'm also an American. I did, however, have to pay exorbitant fees to get a visa. I'm in Korea right now and I didn't have to do much of anything here either. What do they do if you just refuse to give them your fingerprints? I'm going to take a boat over from South Korea, will I still get fingerprinted?

    56. Re:New Travel Destination by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      You're comparing an unaffiliated lone terrorist who commits a murder to a massive army that has officially sanctioned torture in its manual?

    57. Re:New Travel Destination by slart42 · · Score: 1

      They're not just doing it to US citizens. They're doing it to everyone. That's not pay-back; that's me-too. AFAIK they *are* only doing it to US citizens, so it's all about pay-back. Though me-too is becoming common around the world as well, I was photographed at the border in Kazahkstan this year as well, and I'm sure they got that idea from the US.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3358627.stm
    58. Re:New Travel Destination by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Yawn. A country ought to know and control who passes through its borders, to include a background check and a recent set of prints to cross-reference with official records. Proving who I am bothers me not at all.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    59. Re:New Travel Destination by Nomen+Publicus · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people genuinely answered yes to the terrorism question? Ask a stupid question, expect to be lied to.

    60. Re:New Travel Destination by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Mostly xenophobic borderline illiterate inbred with rice farmers mentality Glad we don't have that here. Well, the rice bit at least.
    61. Re:New Travel Destination by trifish · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if Japan is doing this kind of as a big 'FU' to the States.

      Then, as an EU resident, I'd like to ask why the "'FU' to the States" affects applies to us here in the EU too.

      Hell, we're used to seeing fingerprints being taken from suspects in the movies. Now, in reality, any tourist that brings money to their economy is suspect? Disgusting.

    62. Re:New Travel Destination by fmobus · · Score: 1

      Also don't hope to find anybody speaking another language, be it english, german, french or brazilian (despite the huge community working for Toyota). mostly because there is no such thing as a "brazilian language" :P

    63. Re:New Travel Destination by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

      I especially enjoy the way US Customs treat you like scum when you've just come off a long trans-Atlantic flight. There was a sign up saying they promised to treat you courteously and politely and that you could complain if you found that wasn't the case but something told me complaining might not be such a great idea.

      --

      ---
      We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    64. Re:New Travel Destination by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      I flew to Atlanta from Montréal for a week-long stay this summer and all they asked for, aside from my passport, was the address where I'd be staying while I was there. They did x-ray my open-toed sandals, though.

    65. Re:New Travel Destination by nilbud · · Score: 0

      They'll kill you, like that chick a couple of weeks back.

      --
      never let a man put his dirty how-do-you-do into your bajingo
    66. Re:New Travel Destination by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

      Brazil started doing this when the US announced it was doing it to all visitors a couple of years ago. It surprised me to see that it has taken other countries so long to start doing this too. What goes around comes around. We do it to the world, then the world will do it to us.
      They're not just doing it to US citizens. They're doing it to everyone. That's not pay-back; that's me-too.
      It's not clear whether the parent post means for "they" to refer to Japan or Brazil, so I'm posting to clarify: Brazil's policy was not "me-too." It was implemented for US citizens only, in the name of reciprocity. In the lines for the Federal Police passport control for foreigners in the arrival areas of international airports, they started having two separate areas once you got through the line: one for US citizens and one for everyone else. US citizens had to be fingerprinted and photographed, just like Brazilians had to be when going to the US.
      My understanding is that Brazil is no longer photographing and fingerprinting anyone, even US citizens, but I think Brazil should have continued doing it. It was not legislation, but an action taken by a judge in a southern state (Rio Grande do Sul, IIRC) that led to the implementation of the policy in the name of reciprocity. I think Brazil should maintain (well, restore, now that it's not being done anymore) that reciprocity, because that's the only way to get bull$#!+ like the US policy, which forces fingeprinting and photographing of citizens of many but not all foreign countries, changed. Let a few executives traveling to São Paulo on business get pissy because everyone from every other country gets to go through without being treated like criminals, complain (in English, natch) and hear (in English) from the Federal Police that it's just reciprocity, and that if they don't like the way US citizens are treated in Brazil, they should take it up with the authorities in the US, who treat Brazilians that way. If a few high-ranking execs from banking companies complain loud enough in the US, the policy could actually change.
      In addition to having read several articles on Brazilian news sites about the policy, I stood in the lines at the international airport in Guarulhos and saw the signs for the two separate areas after arriving at the front of the line. The looks on the faces of the US travelers, especially, the "look how important I am" types who had taken overnight flights in business suits and were getting out their newest-latest crackberries to make sure everyone could see them, were priceless.
      FWIW, I am a US citizen, but didn't have to go to the "US citizens" area because I already had a permanent visa and several forms of Brazilian ID, including two with photographs, so I just breezed through the normal lines, exchanging a few pleasant words with the Federal Police agents (in Portuguese, of course) as I went.
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    67. Re:New Travel Destination by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      This is the main thing I see as a problem in US Customs (and possibly elsewhere): The front-line officer has way too much power at their discretion. If you talk to a supervisor, they're likely to say "ok, I'll write up a report", and then you get deported by the officer (if not detained) and put "on probation" for entering, which likely means you won't be able to again without significant checks, every time.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    68. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also don't hope to find anybody speaking another language, be it english, german, french or brazilian (despite the huge community working for Toyota).

      If you didn't find anybody speaking "brazilian" language is because is too difficult, as the "american" language.

    69. Re:New Travel Destination by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Brazil started doing this when the US announced it was doing it to all visitors a couple of years ago. It surprised me to see that it has taken other countries so long to start doing this too. What goes around comes around. We do it to the world, then the world will do it to us.

      This also applies to torture and other interogation techniques like "water boarding" for captured soldiers. In the future our military personal should expect to have the same treatment that we are giving others with water boarding, etc. UM, what captured soldiers are you talking about? To the best of my knowledge, none of the members of the Iraqi Army that were captured when we overthrew Saddam were subject to water boarding or other techniques that could be called torture.
      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    70. Re:New Travel Destination by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I would suggest you not go to Universal Studios Orlando as well. They scan your finger print when you enter the park (unless you're a child) and they scan your finger print if you use their lockers, which some rides won't let women take purses on the rides, so you have to use the lockers.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    71. Re:New Travel Destination by Selivanow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um....hmmm...maybe, just maybe the form is generic and not made especially for you. I know that it may be difficultly to comprehend, but old people do go through customs as well. Sorry for the inconvenience, and please, try not to answer "yes" next time.

      --
      -- ...trying to make digital files uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet. -Bruce Schneier
    72. Re:New Travel Destination by kklein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am very much against the US policy regardless, but it's worth pointing out that the US does not fingerprint green-card holders.

      I live in Japan. My wife is Japanese. I work for a Japanese university. I pay Japanese taxes. I have a Japanese driver's license. I have several Japanese bank accounts and a couple Japanese credit cards. I am on Japanese health insurance. I have the Japanese equivalent of a green card.

      Yet I will have to go through the "foreigner" line from now on, separated from my wife, to be fingerprinted because everyone knows there was no crime in Japan before we dirty foreigners showed up. And I'll have to do this every time I re-enter the country, despite the fact that I am on a long-term spousal visa and already have to go to immigration every few years to get it renewed and to pay for the ability to exit and re-enter the country when I want. They already have every piece of information about me, where and how I met my wife, and a hand-drawn map to my house. If I had to submit my fingerprint, too, that'd be irksome, but I'd do it, but why do I have to do it every time I land at the airport? I live here!

    73. Re:New Travel Destination by Parasome · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not a "gaping flaw". I think the idea is just to prevent re-entry of people that do not conform to the rules. Sure, you can submit the slip without really leaving the country (whereafter you are an illegal alien), and if you leave sometime later, the mismatch can be detected if any data comparison is made with the actual flight data, which is available -> re-entry denied. If you just leave (and entirely fail to submit the slip in the time of your visa), you will also be denied re-entry.

    74. Re:New Travel Destination by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Isn't the US doing this to all foreigners, not just those from Japan? (hint: the answer's not 'no')

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    75. Re:New Travel Destination by tripmine · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't recommend Disney World either. They bind your finger print to your ticket so only you can use that ticket to re-enter the park in the same day. It seriously takes less than 5 second between putting your ticket in the machine, getting your index finger scanned, grabbing your ticket, and walking through the turnstile.

    76. Re:New Travel Destination by kayditty · · Score: 0

      Is there a good mixture of 12+ in Cambodia, as well? By the way, it's Philippines.

    77. Re:New Travel Destination by GregPK · · Score: 1

      Why don't you have one of those LCD license plate covers. Just turn it on everytime you get near a camera. No tracking...

    78. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * Vivisections were performed on prisoners infected with various diseases. Scientists performed invasive surgery on prisoners, removing organs to study the effects of disease on the human body. These were conducted while the patients were alive because it was felt that the decomposition process would affect the results.[8][6] The infected and vivisected prisoners included men, women, children and infants.[9]

      * Vivisections were also performed on pregnant women, sometimes impregnated by doctors, and the fetus removed.[10]

      * Prisoners had limbs amputated in order to study blood loss.

      * Those limbs that were removed were sometimes re-attached to the opposite sides of the body.

      * Some prisoners' limbs were frozen and amputated, while others had limbs frozen then thawed to study the effects of the resultant untreated gangrene and rotting.

      * Some prisoners had their stomachs surgically removed and the esophagus reattached to the intestines.

      * Parts of the brain, lungs, liver, etc. were removed from some prisoners.[11][7][6]

      # Some prisoners were hung upside down to see how long it would take for them to choke to death.[6]

      # Some prisoners had air injected into their arteries to determine the time until the onset of embolism.[6]

      # Some prisoners had horse urine injected into their kidneys.[6]

      # Some prisoners were deprived of food and water to determine the length of time until death.

      # Some prisoners were placed into high pressure chambers until death.

      # Some prisoners were exposed to extreme temperatures and developed frostbite to determine how long humans could survive with such an affliction, and to determine the effects of rotting and gangrene on human flesh.[6]

      # Some experiments were performed to determine the relationship between temperature, burns and human survival.

      # Some prisoners were placed into centrifuges and spun until dead.

      # Animal blood was injected into some prisoners and the effects studied.

    79. Re:New Travel Destination by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "This also applies to torture and other interogation techniques like "water boarding" for captured soldiers. In the future our military personal should expect to have the same treatment that we are giving others with water boarding, etc."

      Name a single "captured soldier" that was subject to water boarding. A single one. Can't do it, can you? Insurgents, who are, by definition, NOT soldiers, have been subject to these techniques. Uniformed soldiers of the Iraqi army were treated very well, with the exception of being paraded in front of cameras - and it was caught and stopped.

      As for "expect to have the same treatment", our soldiers fully expect to be tortured, burned, executed, beheaded (not necessarily in that order) and have their headless bodies dumped in the river. That all started long before any allegations of torture were levelled against the US.

      Water boarding and other similar techniques are wrong, and should never have been authorized, but the local insurgents and international terrorist organizations have NEVER played by the rules of the Geneva convention. Indeed, that is their whole modus operandi - targetting civilians in the full knowledge that the military cannot effectively respond in a civilian environment.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    80. Re:New Travel Destination by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "unaffiliated lone terrorist who commits a murder"

      Huh? IIRC, Daniel Pearl was captured and held by a group affiliated with an international terrorist organization, was stabbed by all the members of that group, and had his head sawed off while being videotaped. Then that tape was delivered through clandesine means to news organizations. I missed the "unaffiliated lone terrorist" part of that.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    81. Re:New Travel Destination by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a scene from Good Morning Vietnam. (From memory)

      "The problem with the Viet Cong is, we can't find them. It's hard to find a Vietnamese man named Charlie, they're all named Nguyen or Dao or something like that."..."So we walk around asking people "Are you the enemy?" and if they say "Yes" then we shoot them."

    82. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, even when slamming yourselves you Americans are pretty self centered. Has it occured to you that more then just Americans visit Japan? Or, gasp, more then Americans travel?

    83. Re:New Travel Destination by Hamfist · · Score: 1

      Do you live in a country that requires your fingerprints as part of its 'official records'? If that is the case, then I can understand your view but will disagree with it rather strongly.

      In much of the world, fingerprints only become part a permanent part of 'official records' if you are charged with and convicted of a crime. Even fingerprints from arrests are to be removed from 'official records' after a period of time. In your example, anyone coming from Canada that has never been arrested will have NEVER been fingerprinted in their entire life. The reasoning behind this is simple: The assertion that fingerprints are part of 'official records' indicates that the individual is the property of the state, when in much of the developed world it is supposed to be the state that is the property of its citizens.

      Countries that fingerprint all of their citizens tend to have legal codes and governmental systems built around the former; I have lived under both types of systems, and my own personal preference is the latter.

    84. Re:New Travel Destination by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I lived in Singapore for 4 years circa ~ 97 to 2001.Yes you are not allowed to throw any Gum on the street ,not to spray any graffiti on Walls, not to make a nuisance of your self on the public transport system,not to play your music too loud in your home.Being a small city state has its advantages,there is no place in Singapore where you cant go with complete safety at 3 in the morning.

      I have now lived in London for 7 years.Unlike the Small Crypto Fascist State ,We have a great range of Human rights here.

      Therefore when i go home on the Tube ,i have to sit on dirty seats because people sit with their feet resting on seats ,listen to rude language and loud music(Freedon of Expression) ,Watch the coucils fight a losing battle with the ever increasing amount of irritating and franky nausious grafiti(Banksky it isnt).

      I also have the complete Right not to venture to Brixton,Camden and Various Council Estates unless i want to be mugged ,happy-slapped whatever by gangs of 12 -13 year old kids.

      I also have the complete freedom to see Children coming to the local mall after school and stealing AND then telling the Police to lay their hands off this because , get this ,THEY HAVE RIGHTS.Meanwhile, Mr Patel can go to the insurers or Retire, His Choice entirely ,after all he does live in a free country.

      There is a Difference between Paper Rights and Actual Rights.Guess Which place had a Higher quality of Life IMHO.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    85. Re:New Travel Destination by avronius · · Score: 1

      Really? I've been to the US (from Canada) dozens of times over the past few years, and have not been asked to step aside and provide finger prints.

      Perhaps the parent is in a unique situation?

    86. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name a single "captured soldier" that was subject to water boarding. A single one. Can't do it, can you? Insurgents, who are, by definition, NOT soldiers, have been subject to these techniques. So they're subhuman and torturing them should be okay? And that's where the problem is - you pick and choose who gets to be a soldier and an insurgent. So what happens when a foreign country starts labeling all U.S. military personnel as insurgents? I know that sounds ridiculous, but you simply cannot have it both ways. You just cannot pick and choose what labels apply to certain individuals. What is even more gross is that this is being done to circumvent the Geneva Conventions.

      As for "expect to have the same treatment", our soldiers fully expect to be tortured, burned, executed, beheaded (not necessarily in that order) and have their headless bodies dumped in the river. That all started long before any allegations of torture were levelled against the US. So that makes anything the U.S. does okay? I was under the impression that the U.S. military was supposed to hold itself to higher moral standards. To simply say "Well the terrorists do worse..." is precisely how water boarding techniques become approved to begin with. There is always that one individual who claims that the other side is worse and that anything done to them is perfectly fine.

      Never mind the fact that torture has been proven to be highly ineffective, as the person being tortured will say almost anything to make you stop. Never mind the fact that these "insurgents and terrorists" were picked up, in some cases, by anonymous tips locals used to settle a score. Never mind the lack of due process and the kangaroo courts. In essence, we are not sure whether they are innocent or not, but we are going to torture them anyway. If they were innocent to begin with, then oops.

      Water boarding and other similar techniques are wrong, and should never have been authorized, but the local insurgents and international terrorist organizations have NEVER played by the rules of the Geneva convention. Wait, wait WHAT? So you're saying that it is wrong, it should have never been authorized, but local insurgents never play by the rules. Again, it almost sounds like you are saying that we should not authorize water boarding, but if we wanted to use it against those that we label as terrorists and insurgents, well, wink wink - nudge nudge.

      Indeed, that is their whole modus operandi - targetting civilians in the full knowledge that the military cannot effectively respond in a civilian environment. This last sentence does nothing to explain how water boarding should be okay for insurgents, which is what you alluded to in your first paragraph.
    87. Re:New Travel Destination by vidarh · · Score: 1

      As much as I dislike the fingerprinting etc., I have never been treated badly by US immigration officials. I don't doubt that it happens, but just wanted to offer an alternative view. I fly London to San Francisco regularly (8-9 times so far this year, 6 or so last year), and the furthest they've gone was once asking me why I come so often to the US, with no follow up questions once I explained (they probably asked because I at that point only had stamps from SFO in my passport, and I had lots of them, - most other countries I go to don't stamp). They also ask the standard questions about what line of business I'm in etc., but that's it. Last time I got a tiny little bit of hassle because I'd forgotten to hand the visa waiver exit slip to the airline last time I left, but since I'd been admitted for 3 months and I was still within that period he only asked me to not do it again.

    88. Re:New Travel Destination by attonitus · · Score: 1

      If you're Canadian then you don't have to do it (yet). As far as I know, if you're from anywhere else then you need a visa or visa waiver, which requires the whole fingerprint, photograph, declaration of not being Muslim, etc. N.B. I'm British, with Canadian permanent residency, and I have to do it.

    89. Re:New Travel Destination by notasheep · · Score: 1

      "What do you mean? My government is precisely the government that is the least interested in what I'm doing and where I'm going, it's all the other governments that keenly inspect my IDs and credentials."

      You must not be a US citizen. The US government is very interested in where you go and what you do. How else will they be able to declare you an "enemy combatant" and lock you up without due process? They need to know that, while you were in Japan, you stopped by a restaurant and spoke to the Islamic owner. Seems mighty suspicious to me... (Yes, that last part was sarcasm.)

      --
      Your mind looks a little cramped. Why don't you stretch it a little?
    90. Re:New Travel Destination by iamacat · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your level of craziness, but there sure are crazy people who would love to travel as you without showing ID, commit crimes and have you serve their time in jail.

    91. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL this cracked me up!

    92. Re:New Travel Destination by ianare · · Score: 1

      Untrue unless this was changed very recently. Green card holders are neither fingerprinted nor photographed upon entering the US.

    93. Re:New Travel Destination by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "You're comparing an unaffiliated lone terrorist"

      If you're going to be using the rationale of "Treat our prisoners well so that our soldiers are treated well if captured," you have to look at what really happens to US soldiers when captured, and who it is the US is fighting against and most likely to capture US soldiers. As it stands, those captured alive are tortured and paraded around before and during their eventual execution, well beyond what happens to those in Guantanamo.

      If you want to argue that the US should not use such tactics in absolute terms, go for it. But as soon as someone makes the relative argument that "We need to treat prisoners well so they will too" (as the parent poster did), you have to look at the real world "they," and not some hypothetical.

    94. Re:New Travel Destination by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      On the other hand you can flirt with the Japanese immigration girls and they will just smile shyly at you :-)

      On a more serious note, the many times I have been to Japan, both the immigration and customs process has been extremely courteous, much more so then in the US and Canada. In fact I can't say I've ever had a bad experience entering Japan (other than having to wait in a queue for 2 hours).

      ]{

    95. Re:New Travel Destination by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Canadians are exempt. It is the only country which is.

      ]{

    96. Re:New Travel Destination by BJH · · Score: 1

      Uh... if your passport tells them exactly who you are, why do they need your fingerprints?

    97. Re:New Travel Destination by putaro · · Score: 1

      What's the danger? Well, you might ask Brandon Mayfield. The FBI made an incorrect match between his fingerprints and some prints found on a bag linked to the Madrid bombings. If they had not had his fingerprints they could not have claimed a match. In his case the match was obviously wrong but the FBI experts claimed that it was a match. Fingerprint matching is not a strictly mechanical process and has a lot of room for interpretation. Furthermore, no one has ever proved that fingerprints are really unique.

    98. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they'll smile shyly at you while giving you your internal cavity check too.

      Or maybe not.

    99. Re:New Travel Destination by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I never "alluded" to anything - I was replying to 2 false aspects of your comment regarding "captured soldiers" and that our own soldiers will be subject to torture as a result of their actions.

      1) The definition of "soldier" is in the Geneva Conventions, and the people setting off IED's, blowing themselves up, and shooting at civilians and soldiers in Iraq do not qualify. You might want to actually read the Geneva conventions before invoking them.

      2) Your warning about the possibility of US soldiers being subject to torture in the future is a red herring - they are subject to torture NOW, and have been subject to torture by those they are fighting for many years. The whole world saw that US soldiers' bodies could be dragged through the streets in Somalia - from then on, the GC's haven't aplied to how US soldiers have been treated.

      There are plenty of reasons why torture is wrong - you just didn't give any of them.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    100. Re:New Travel Destination by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Persecution?!

      Lol. The poor Nazis just wanted to be left alone...

      Did you mean 'prosecution'?

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    101. Re:New Travel Destination by pyr3 · · Score: 1

      It's not just Americans. The American bashers are focusing on the US-centric aspect of this too... which is ridiculous because it also affects them as well.

    102. Re:New Travel Destination by Hansinator · · Score: 1

      Letting foreign people take your fingerprint is just like letting them take nude photography of you.
      Difference is, everybody would avoid a country having the latter as a law for tourists.

      Something is wrong here.

    103. Re:New Travel Destination by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Just curious what sort of visa are you required to do this? I have to have a passport to enter the US from Canada, but that's it. is this for non North American countries?"

      Actually this is JUST for people flying or boating in from any destination other than our southern border apparently...

      If you just come through by walking/swimming across our southernmost border, you can get in with NO ID checks whatsoever. Not only that, you apparently cannot be deported if you are later discovered to be in the states illegally. Hell, in some states, we'll even issues you a drivers license, take your kids into our schools, and pay for all your healthcare needs via our hospital's emergency rooms.

      So, if you want to come to the US and avoid all this nastiness...just fly first to Mexico, and come across that border as described above. I also hear it is about as easy to just walk across our northern border with Canada too.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    104. Re:New Travel Destination by cuantar · · Score: 1

      When I last left Japan, I got into a conversation with one of the girls at the airport check-in counter about my work at an American physics lab. She seemed interested and wasn't entirely clueless, which made me very happy.

      As for politeness, yes, it is my experience as well that nearly everybody in a position to deal with people is very courteous in Japan. There was only one instance to the contrary that stands out in my mind, and that was when I went to get my gaijin card. The man behind the counter was exceedingly rude; I addressed him in Japanese and he continued to pretend I didn't understand him, although I answered his questions entirely in his language. The type of speech he used was also rather impolite, compared to the excessive use of keigo everywhere else.

      I had a (Western) friend who had some pretty bad trouble the first time he opened a bank account. His Japanese was good, but the teller refused to look at him and instead directed all inquiries to his girlfriend, who just stood next to him while he answered.

      --
      Legalize it.
    105. Re:New Travel Destination by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I found people speaking English. I tried with my very meager Japanese first but frequently was able to fall back on the unofficial world language for tourism. It is no where near what it is in Europe however, so if you are thinking it will be just because it too is a 1st world country, wrong, it is considerably worse.

      My limited (12 days) experience with the Japanese was exceptionally positive :)

      --Joey

    106. Re:New Travel Destination by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      The reason they are doing this is because under the guise of terrorism they are attempting to reduce the number of crimes committed by foreigners, including overstaying visas. The whole idea of terrorism has nothing to do with why they passed this policy.

      I disagree with this assertion. They are attempting to increase the total number of crimes committed by foreigners, or, to be more exact, the number of convictions for crimes already committed, so that the number of "crimes" committed by non-Japanese will rise.

      Statistics (from jref.org; it's linked elsewhere in the comments) show that Americans, Brits, and other Westerners commit something like one-twentieth to one-tenth the crime of the Japanese. The fact that work visas are only given to college graduates -- adults with a lot to lose -- is one reason why criminals from our countries don't bother coming to Japan to begin with.

      Unfortunate for the Japanese government, who has for the past decade or more been popularizing the fiction that foreign crime is rampant and always on the increase.

      Until very recently, overstaying a visa for a short period of time was (provided that no criminal acts were committed in that period) a minor offense on par with letting your driver's license expire or speeding on the highway. It was an administrative problem. Now, such overstays are considered "crimes" in the statistics, despite the damage to society not being anything near murder, arson, assault, rape, and the rest of the crimes in this category. The change was made because the LDP loves to scapegoat foreigners in their always-effective tactic of using fear of The Other to gain votes. They need to keep pumping those numbers up, and getting their prints in a database and checking on them repeatedly is a good way to do that.

      Test this theory yourself. If you're American or British, ask a Japanese person near you what they think the crime rate is in Japan by people of your nationality, as a percentage of the Japanese rate. They will wildly overestimate the actual figure of 0.05-0.1.

    107. Re:New Travel Destination by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      So, if the 1000 member Al Qaeda decides they don't follow Geneva Conventions, the 300 million Americans shouldn't either? Why should cops follow the law when criminals don't? That premise is bad.

      America never sunk to that level. When the British kidnapped and forced American sailors into the British navy, America didn't do the same.
      When Iranians captured American embassy workers, America didn't do the same.

      Look at the Russian-Afghan war. The Russians were pretty brutal to captured Afghanis, using them for knife practice. The Afghanis reciprocated. Eventually Americans and CIA officers managed to get both sides to stop the cruel practice by having one side stop and the other follow.

    108. Re:New Travel Destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's another thing they don't like at the airport. Jokes. You can't joke about a bomb. Well, why is it just jokes? What about a riddle? How about a limerick? How about a bomb anecdote? You know, no punch line, just a really cute story. Or suppose you intended the remark not as a joke but as an ironic musing? Are they prepared to make that distinction? I think not! And besides, who's to say what's funny?

    109. Re:New Travel Destination by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      How 'affiliated' do you think they were? Did they show us an Al Qaeda membership card or just say they were fans? Did they have Bin Laden's number?

      Back to the point. Al Qaeda is very unpopular in Pakistan. However, if America starts torturing and makes it official policy, you will see more people sign up, as the US actions would prove what Al Qaeda was saying all along. The US is incredibly poor at the hearts and minds thing, if the next president keeps this rate up, they'll think it's all America and not just Bush that's the cause.

    110. Re:New Travel Destination by mattis_f · · Score: 1

      No, they're fingerprinted and photographed when they get their green card instead... No need to repeat the process. :-)

    111. Re:New Travel Destination by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      For the Visa waiver program, I also need to fill out a form every time asking whether I am a nazi, have any infectious diseases or have the intention to commit terrorist acts. I always thought this was brilliant. Think of all the time saved on police work !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    112. Re:New Travel Destination by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I am very much against the US policy regardless, but it's worth pointing out that the US does not fingerprint green-card holders.
      ...because they don't have to, because they already have your fingerprints on file from your green card application.

      Plus, they're stored on the card too.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    113. Re:New Travel Destination by chitokutai · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I think that rather than trying to increase crime numbers, they are more about showing to the media how they are trying to do something about 'crime'. However one of the biggest barriers for creating the impression of increasing crime numbers will be the numbers themselves.http://www.npa.go.jp/english/seisaku5/20071019.pdf

      The crime statistics for 2006 were released and there was an across the board drop in the number of crimes committed by foreigners. I'm kind of curious to see how the media can spin this even more, but at least they can't use phrases like "year on year increases".

      I do realize that this won't really change the impression that normal Japanese people have, but it has been my experience that most people here tend to overreact in general. Case in point, the people I work with are all afraid of being murdered by anyone that might be causing problems on the train, in the grocery store, etc. They feel that if they try to stop the trouble or ask politely to have someone stop something that it will mean their death.

    114. Re:New Travel Destination by kklein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and again, that doesn't bother me. It wouldn't bother me if they wanted my fingerprints on file. It's that I have to be fingerprinted every time I come into the country as though I were a "foreigner," when I have always been treated as a resident because, you know, I am.

    115. Re:New Travel Destination by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Cat has bad influencement on ma grammar... make that Brasilium... Bresilalium... or that other portuguese they speak down there...

    116. Re:New Travel Destination by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The US requires fingerprinting as part of the passport process, but passports are not mandatory within the country.

      How would you control borders?

      I'm not frightened of being fingerprinted because I do not fear my government.

      I want exclusivity, border control, and tracking of foreigners. I want the sort that do not want to be tracked to stay out of my country, so laws or actions that deter them from visiting suit me fine. I have no problem with other governments tracking me when I visit their countries. No like the rules, stay at home.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    117. Re:New Travel Destination by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

      I've always gone in via Newark. Maybe that's the difference.

      --

      ---
      We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

    118. Re:New Travel Destination by thetagger · · Score: 1

      The free is just a matter of reciprocity. Brazil does not have its own sets of rules towards foreigners, it only returns the treatment it gets.

    119. Re:New Travel Destination by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      The poor Nazis just wanted to be left alone...
      o_o
    120. Re:New Travel Destination by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      it took the best part of 4.5 hours to get through the non-residents queue..

      At least you didn't spend 8 hours getting through customs followed by being tasered to death!

      Most people would think you would be safe traveling to Canada. Just make sure you speak english I guess, as the victim did not provoke the police at all. Of course, as per usual the RCMP are investigating themselves (though there is one outside party). As it is of international interest, I wish officials from another country would be permitted to investigate as well.
      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    121. Re:New Travel Destination by silpol · · Score: 1

      and read again "will be made available to both domestic police and foreign governments."

      afaik, in typical law enforcement language this ALSO stands for "we are special police of govt country X and recently we have got this fingerprints /pic attached/ in relation with terrorism accident - please verify it against your database and notify us if reply is positive"

      --
      this field has been intentionally left blank ;)
    122. Re:New Travel Destination by djradon · · Score: 1

      More likely they're just as paranoid about foreigners as we are.

  2. Hmmm... by ScaryMonkey · · Score: 1

    I already live in Japan... I wonder if I will have to do this if I go on vacation and am coming back home?

    1. Re:Hmmm... by dancingmad · · Score: 3, Informative

      already live in Japan... I wonder if I will have to do this if I go on vacation and am coming back home?

      I live in Aomori-ken and yes, it does. I love living here, but I am very upset about these measures. Rightly or wrongly (stastically wrongly, but seeing the way some English teachers and others behave here, I'm not surprised many Japanese people see things this way) the uptick in immigration is associated with crime (though in the U.S. it's the same way). I am very unhappy that while I have been a productive citizen here I am going to be treated like a criminal when I leave to visit other countries and return.

      There's a lot to love here, but the conservative party and those supporting it (including the supposed opposition party) need to go.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:Hmmm... by spooje · · Score: 1

      Yes, you will and you'll have to stand in the foreigner line instead of going through the Japanese citizens' line.

      --
      Tea and kung-fu. Life is good. Rising Phoenix
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not to nitpick, but if you were really a productive "citizen" then there shouldn't be a problem, this applies to non-citizens only. If you meant that you are a productive member of Japanese society, the fact that you aren't a citizen means you are just out of luck. I think the appropriate term is "love it or leave it" or perhaps "go back to where you came from"

      I'm not trying to be a jerk here, actually. it's that I am frustrated that here in the US (and I AM a citizen) we are doing much worse, and when someone complains he/she is branded a traitor (if he/she looks white/black) or told one of those two quotes if he/she looks non-white/non-black, regardless of citizenship.

      Bottom line, Japan is still a lot better than the US, but I'm afraid that doesnt mean much, because that is true for a lot of countries now.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Riktov · · Score: 1

      Assuming you are not a Japanese citizen, yeesh, do you live in a cave? I thought pretty much every single foreigner living in Japan has heard lots and lots about this. (The answer is, yes, you will have to be fingerprinted and photographed every time you leave and enter the country.)

    5. Re:Hmmm... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      There will be an extra line for the re-entry permit holders. So that should go pretty fast. But still ... As I want to continue living here, I can just bow my head and do it ...

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    6. Re:Hmmm... by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are things worse in Japan.

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    7. Re:Hmmm... by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat as you. I live in Japan and was planning a short 3-day vacation this January, but the fingerprinting thing sucks.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    8. Re:Hmmm... by Asmodai · · Score: 1

      The immigration line already takes up more than half an hour on most of my visits. I guess I should be looking at an hour nowadays. Just insane. Not to mention retaking it every single freaking time.

      Looks like the conservatist party wants Japan to sink back into xenophobia. I'm glad my Japanese girlfriend will come live with me.

      --
      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
    9. Re:Hmmm... by Tychon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you don't mind my asking, what exactly are English teachers doing that is so horrific? I understand that Americans can be... awfully exuberant might be a polite way of putting it, but how much of this is general social shock versus them actually being asshats?

      Not trying to suggest that "Oh, that simply cannot be!", just a bit curious of the situation. I've been pondering the JET program for after I finish my degree and any information on such things from a person that's actually over there wouldn't hurt.

    10. Re:Hmmm... by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if they go, there is no one left to replace them. There really is only one party here.

    11. Re:Hmmm... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Bottom line, Japan is still a lot better than the US

      On what basis do you make this claim?

      For much of the world, Japan is still the US' most enthusiastic booster, at least in regard to foreign policy. And the civil liberties record in Japan is not exactly ideal. Are you aware of the 99% conviction rate?

      Japan and the US, as different as they are as cultures, have some striking similarities in their strange blend of democracy and authoritarianism.

    12. Re:Hmmm... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Or you can become a Japanese citizen and do something about it.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    13. Re:Hmmm... by mad+flyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yes you do... (nitpick) and I don't know who moderate this as insightfull...

      Japanese citizenship is somewhat hard to take. I'm married to a Japanese. So she is 1 form away from beeing French... But in the meantime I'm always granted temporary visa allowing me to stay with her (3 years to be renewed) And for that we have to proof that we have enought income, proper home. health insurance and so on... Hell my cat (French too) is better treated than me. Citizenship, maybe I can ask it, if I stay five year with the same employer or other irrelevant rule like this...

      Meanwhile if we were to live in France, it would be the opposite, the simple fact that she can proof that she is married to me give here right to healthcare, unemployement benefits, social help, free school for the kids on so on...

      Before you say, "it's their country, they do as they please" Just 1 thing... IT'S MY PLANET AND I WANT THEM TO GET OFF OF IT...

    14. Re:Hmmm... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you aware of the 99% conviction rate?

      That statistic doesn't mean anything on its own, so I'm going to contribute an article.

    15. Re:Hmmm... by gwynevans · · Score: 1

      In certain cases, being victims - e.g. Lindsay Ann Hawker

    16. Re:Hmmm... by Riquez · · Score: 1

      IT'S MY PLANET AND I WANT THEM TO GET OFF OF IT
      Ha ha - but I hope your wife doesn't read slashdot?!

      Seriously though, a lot of things in Japan are frustrating for foreigners, especially anything official.
      I find there are 2 types of reaction: Some people moan a lot & complain how crap it is compared to their home country, & then those who say "yeah, its daft, but that's how it is"

      Of course it's normal to gripe about the things that you don't like, but also you'll have a more relaxed life if you accept some things.

      I'm not suggesting you complain too much, I found your post interesting & since I live in Japan too I can relate to your experience. I just wanted to comment & say that, in my experience, even with the frustrations - I enjoy living here much more than the UK.
      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
    17. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious. What are we doing "much worse" in the US? Letting millions of illegal aliens live here with, at best, a token effort to send them home? Granting automatic citizenship to everyone who's born here, regardless of the legal status of his or her parents? Making legal citizenship an attainable goal for millions, regardless of where they came from?

      Hint: there are families who've been living in Japan for generations who still don't have Japanese citizenship.

      Hint #2: the US has over 12 million naturalized citizens. Japan has fewer than 300,000.

      Hint #3: you don't have the slightest clue what you're babbling about.

    18. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data gathered by the Japanese has already been sold, to Accenture, the off-shore consulting firm that got the Japan-wide contract for 100,000 yen (about US$900). You probably wouldn't give your e-mail address to this outfit, but enter Japan and you are giving them your total identity.

    19. Re:Hmmm... by kklein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first time I went back to renew my spousal visa, I just brought the forms and the money. I didn't bring the family register or certificate of address or any of the ridiculous supporting documentation you need to get from all over Japan (okay, where we live now, and where she grew up). Why would I need all that stuff? We had just submitted it all 12 months before. I figured I was just showing up to say "Still here; still married; please renew my visa." But after waiting a couple hours to get to the counter, the lady was like, "where is all the information?"

      I had no idea that I was required to apply for a new spousal visa. I wasn't renewing, I was reapplying!

      And this just days before my visa was running out! I thought I was going to be deported!

      My wife came in and worked her persuasive magic (that's why I married her--I saw no other choice!) and got them to count my little form as "starting the process" so I wouldn't be deported, and even talked them into giving me a 3-year visa, which they said they would not do.

      The point of the story is that it doesn't matter how integrated you are; it doesn't matter if your most immediate family is Japanese; it doesn't matter if you are gainfully employed. The only thing that matters about you is that you are NOT JAPANESE, and therefore are not quite human in the eyes of the law.

      Someone already mentioned this, but just look at the famous cases of foreigners being murdered over here. The last famous case (not far from where I live), a guy killed a female English teacher, nine police officers came to his house, and he escaped.

      Barefoot.

      BY RUNNING PAST THE COPS AND OUT HIS FRONT DOOR.

      They still haven't found him. They won't.

      That would require looking.

    20. Re:Hmmm... by RobFlynn · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing...

      --

      ---
      Rob Flynn
      Pidgin
    21. Re:Hmmm... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Not to grouse, but I submitted this on THURSDAY!

      Everytime I submit something and see it attributed to others makes me wonder if the Karma rating is fake, and that only non-controversial submitters will get posted. Does anyone else wonder that? That words or profanity or assymetrical thinking....

      http://slashdot.org/~davidsyes/journal/187915

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    22. Re:Hmmm... by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately for me, and for others whose passports say "USA", as tourists, we cannot legally stay in Japan more than 90 days at a time AND subsidize our stay via legal work. The normal ways westerners from the US can stay over 90 days are:

      -- Finally gain residency (by defined immigration means)
      -- become hired by a company which handles all the processing in advance (or, after the fact, sends the new hire out for one day to reenter as a hired employee)
      -- be transferred there by an external or internal company having recognized operations/presence in Japan
      -- at day 89 or 90, depart for at least one day, say to Korea, The Philippines, or SOMEplace outside of Japan proper, then return

      Now, as for Canadians, many Europeans, many Asians from local non-enemy countries, and Australia, visitors CAN stay over 90 days AND work to subsidize their visit. They can stay **180*** days before having to depart.

      I realize that there potentially could be hundreds of thousands of "merkuns" who could visit Japan and theoretically, if allowed to stay 180 days like other non-US passport holders, could swamp out the other visitors from smaller, less number-intensive who may have a lot to offer to Japan besides the presence of US companies and diplomats and soldiers/base occupation.

      So, many "Americans" or US passport holders CHEAT, or game the system. They do the round-robin number, until at some point, some diligent or irritated immigration worker/officer sees the impropriety of doing this to effectively "live" in Japan. Sure, some of these US citizens CAN and DO speak Japanese, and maybe even other languages and probably have a lot to offer, but that's not the point. The Japanese system is very specific (not that the US' isn't), and some things are frowned upon.

      Another way people cheat is by exploiting their dual citizenship status in more than one country. Some people visiting Japan are blood-related (but not enough) and hold a Japanese passport (or maybe just permission) to go to school, but hold Australian, Canadian, and European passports and just rotate them carefully so as to time/juxtapose the stamps so as to confuse or snow the immigration official at the inspection counter. Until and unless a system tracking retina, fingerprints, and other non-passport-dependent information is installed and vetted of bogus information, people will game the system.

      This is likely the UNSPOKEN reason. 9/11 is a red herring. Since the embarrassing loss of WWII Japan generally knows how to conduct herself so as to not INVITE or DESERVE any 9/11 attack from external elements. Showing pity for the US is just a face-saving AND a red-herring method to push this fingerprinting thing through. I don't AT ALL have a problem with it. I've encountered numerous people gaming the system, and they are just giving a bad name to everyone who WANTS to LEGALLY immigrate to, even if only seasonally residing in, Japan.

      So, what I'd like to see Japan's Immigration agency consider is something like this:

      - Time-Restricted visitors should earn behavior points accrued during their initial and susequent stays

      -- those who show respect for immigration and labor laws (or, at least not "caught", or if found out, at least have not received any official action such as fines, ejection, barring, etc...) get to apply for seasonal 180-day or 90+ day duration visits.

      -- After at least one or two successful (needn't be consecutive) and trouble-free visits, the visitor could apply for and obtain a working permit to subsidize visits.

      -- after so many (maybe 4 or 5) repeated 90+day visit/working holiday stays, the person would be required to "take a break" so as to allow OTHER first-time visiting US or time-restricted visitors to enjoy the same new benefit granted to US or time-restricted visitors.

      I say this because I don't think Japan is trying to be evil, but somewhere along the line in my frustration, I began using the statement, "But *I* didn't drop the bomb. I wasn't even BORN then. I had

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    23. Re:Hmmm... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Many of the guys there are players. They see the Japanese women as some exotic sex freaks and something to conquer. Not all the guys, but enough of them that it is troublesome. It also doesn't help when a loser of a local loses the girl who probably was already going to dump him finds out he's lost her to a gaijin. Then, sometimes the girls lose the guy when another girl comes along.

      Aside from sex players, some of whom who just happen to be US English-speaking teachers, some of them end up teaching at Starbucks or maybe Freshness Cafe or Freshness Burger or other places. They might run afoul of the limits on their working visas and when caught, just create more mess for the local agencies to follow up with. Messes up the orderly, neat day.

      Sometimes, the English teachers are not as smart of polite as they ought, or they get caught up in speaking Japanese in their English classes.

      And, sometimes, the stress and limitations imposed by government or by some of the teaching schools drives the teachers batty, and they either quit their contract and leave by rules in teh law (the proper way, if they are going to quit), or they leave, and jump ship (or try to) another company which might bend the immigration rules processing and acquire the quit-but-non-departing teacher who hasn't properly followed the rules.

      Then, the BIGGEST problem.... frauds who DO NOT have the degrees or certs they claim they earned. I encountered such people, who flaunted that they never completed college, or never attended college, and then sully the process for people who could really be teaching assistants (non-degree, but highly articulate, personality-gifted (at the appropriate times) and possibly "exemptable" tourists who locally apply but cannot be hired (my case, when the economy was bad) because so many visa-holding teachers are still awaiting assignment to avoid being deported or forced to self-depart.

      There are other reasons, too, such as teachers who sell themselves to the Yakuza as controllers, or to other people who supplement the income of teachers who somehow increase their cost of living and decide to illegally gain more income they don't have to report (filing taxes and income statements I understand are voluntary, with very little negative effect for NOT filing, unlike in the US...)...

      And, there are OTHER reasons....

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    24. Re:Hmmm... by Durf · · Score: 1

      The point of the story is that it doesn't matter how integrated you are; it doesn't matter if your most immediate family is Japanese; it doesn't matter if you are gainfully employed. The only thing that matters about you is that you are NOT JAPANESE, and therefore are not quite human in the eyes of the law.

      Actually the point of the story is you should have bothered looking up the required documentation before wandering into the government office and asking for your status of residence extension.

      Lindsay Ann Hawker's killing was a depraved act and the police are a bunch of keystone kops much of the time, but that has little to do with your failure to get your stuff together.

    25. Re:Hmmm... by Tychon · · Score: 1

      Oh, so there are still positions for non-degreed people? I had been holding off for so long because everything I'd personally seen was requiring a degree — admittedly not a bad thing given the number of people that claim to be capable of teaching proper English, but very disheartening for someone like me who has just begun the walk on university road. Are there any programs towards becoming an assistant, or is it pretty much just a you happen to be available in Japan at the time they need assistance and have a work visa sort of thing?

    26. Re:Hmmm... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      I researched it while still in the US before going to visit Tokyo, in 2004. When I got there, I began to learn that, as usual, feet on the ground often is more revealing that web sites.

      Expats and repeat visitors there told me to go to Nova and talk directly with them. So, I did that, and the people there were amazed (or so they acted) when I began to speak. They drool over native English rather than 2nd-hand learned English, so much so to the point that even an ASIAN born in the US and who speaks graduate-level English or as well as any so-called degreed person from the US is likely to be turned down over white, Black, or even Latino who speaks articulately.

      Anyway, they (or one of their competitors, or was it both of them) would have taken me, despite having no degree, but the economy was still in the tail end of the crash, and I wasn't going to be there long enough to have face time while the economy officially showed itself turned around.

      What you apply for is a Teaching Assistant position. Since theoretically (or on practicality) you're not "teaching" and you're just "assisting" the teacher, you might get a position in a very busy company.

      Be warned though: not all of the shops are equal, or even near equal. Some places forbid after-hours income (they either want you committed to them, or just want you to learn how to decompress, get sleep and be worth it to your students/teacher's students), while others don't care if you tutor in Starbucks.

      Tutoring is still teaching, and if you get caught, you can get into trouble. That's why I did not even bother with that risk. Lots of people DO game the system, and I think I encountered at least 5 people who outright told me they either faked their creds or overstayed, or had more than one job, one being within the scope of their visa, and the other outside of the visa restrictions.

      But, Teaching Assistant/Teacher Assistant, at least in 2004/early 2005 was a viable way to go. However, many of the potentially-accepted, degreed types could weigh in and complain and cause that avenue to close up. Not sure if that WOULD happen, as teaching assistants would earn less money to start with and may provide the "Novas" a way to improve productivity with an acceptable increase in cost...

      Good Luck.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    27. Re:Hmmm... by kklein · · Score: 1

      Yes, I suppose you're right. But my point is that this is not the case in any other country I've ever heard of. Also that this wasn't explained to me when I got the visa. In fact, what they said was, "Just come back next year with these forms," and handed me the forms, which I filled out that afternoon, and then just took them in a year later.

      Furthermore, when I originally got the visa, I was actually just planning on extending my professor visa, but the guy at the counter basically refused to give it to me because "the spousal is better." So I got all the nonsense together, submitted it, and was given a ONE YEAR visa, despite the fact that I was eligible for a 3-year professorial, and that getting and renewing a professor visa is a trivial matter of proving you're employed by an accredited university.

      This is how I got the 3-year spousal visa, actually. My wife and I complained that we didn't want to come in every year with documentation from the city hall in the middle of nowhere where she grew up, plus all the green papers from where we live now, and all the driving and expense associated with that. We had originally just wanted the professor visa, but if we switched from the spousal to the professor, we'd be given a one-year professor visa, and getting a spousal in the future would be hard because it would raise the question "why did you abandon your spousal status?"

      Yes, of course I was at fault. But where else in the world--among the developed countries anyway--is a spouse of a citizen kept on this short a leash? I was not upset about the amount of trouble it took to get the visa in the first place--it really does offer a lot of freedom, so I understand why they would need to make sure it was a real and stable marriage--I was upset that I had to do most of that again every year for 5 years (what they originally told me, before we pointed out that this was insane). That is the point. I have every right to live here. However, since I don't have the mythical Japanese blood, I am treated with suspicion. It's insane.

      That is the point.

    28. Re:Hmmm... by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up for a refreshingly different line of thinking from the typical responses. There's some insight here that was an eye-opener for me:

      * Lots of people cheating the system, in everything from immigration to Japan Rail Passes. Anyone who's lived in Japan for a while knows the type. These people do it not to fight an "unjust" system, but simply out of laziness and a willingness to take advantage of Japan's customer-service oriented culture for their own advantage. If indeed the aim is to catch these people because the authorities are fed up with their antics, then I agree with that mission wholeheartedly.

      * The parent shows an understanding for, and humility about LANGUAGE and respect for the ways of society. So many foreigners in Japan assume they deserve equal, or even better, treatment when they don't even speak proper Japanese (would the reverse apply to a Japanese person in the USA who didn't speak a word of English??). In this thread, there are lots of complaints about Japan's allegedly discriminatory society, but it's important to separate the ones that stem from things one can't control (such as race, birthplace) versus things that one CAN do something about, if one is willing (language, acceptance of society and culture, and, in the case of generational residents originally from Korea, citizenship). Sifting through the complaints like that lets us focus on the small number of truly unjust issues, like a few remaining incidents of blanket racial discrimination, that really deserve to be resolved.

      That being said, I'm not sure I agree with the parent's conclusion that the fingerprinting is justified (on an ideological basis, mostly) -- but I think some very valid and interesting points were made.

  3. So? by PenisLands · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's the big deal? This makes a lot of sense. It could help in catching criminals... and that's probably what it's going to be used for.

    1. Re:So? by keesh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I take it you don't object to the police searching your house or randomly stopping you and giving you a cavity search either? That could also help in catching criminals.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what else could help in catching criminals? Making every car carry a GPS tracking device, and putting a camera in every room of the house (including the bathroom). You need a better justification than that.

    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the big deal? This makes a lot of sense. It could help in catching criminals... and that's probably what it's going to be used for.

      Taking DNA samples could also help catch criminals. And so would implanting GPS chips in every traveler (or citizen). And video camera records of all public spaces would surely be useful. We could also make all mental and medical history records available to the police as well as all shopping records done by credit cards and checks. And with enough cameras you could log where any vehicle is at a given time. In effect you could determine the location of every person at all times and have a good idea what they are doing and the other people they were with (if you log bus and subway records, video cameras, etc.).

      And if somebody disabled any of this tracking information (perhaps by paying with everything with cash and hiding their license plate numbers) then it would be likely that if there was a crime committed then they were trying to cover up their involvement. Heck, we could cut out the cash issue by having ATMs check the numbers of the bills that are given out and have retailers scan the numbers during purchases.

      It sounds like if you had enough intrusive monitoring methods it would be fairly easy to knock out all crime (or at least catch all of the criminals). So now all you have to do is determine when the cost of these methods is less than the cost of crime.

    4. Re:So? by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but those things inconvenience me. This wouldn't inconvenience me.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    5. Re:So? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      or randomly stopping you and giving you a cavity search

            Some people might actually even enjoy it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:So? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      That arugument works as much as the argument that nations are becoming police states because they all have groups dedicated to keeping peace. There's plenty of things that can be considered wrong with the new policy, but your response is little more than reactionary bull.

    7. Re:So? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you don't object to the police searching your house or randomly stopping you and giving you a cavity search either? That could also help in catching criminals. There's a very large difference between giving fingerprints and having your house or rectum searched.

      There are two components to gathering fingerprints: The initial fingerprinting and the "match" found at an incriminating location.

      Your privacy only becomes violated by fingerprints when a crime is comitted AND it can additionally provide evidence you were NOT in said location if your status as a criminal is ever questioned.

      Fingerprinting is not a slippery-slope scenario as you are making it out to be.
      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    8. Re:So? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a very large difference between giving fingerprints and having your house or rectum searched.

      The difference is only one of degree, not of kind.

      There are two components to gathering fingerprints: The initial fingerprinting and the "match" found at an incriminating location.

      Equivalently, there are two components to searching your house: the initial search and the "match" of something in your house that the cops think is illegal, or might be indicative of illegal activity -- e.g. "drug paraphernalia," even if the only thing you ever smoke in the pipe they turn up is tobacco. The point is that, without probable cause, they shouldn't be looking in the first place.

      Your privacy only becomes violated by fingerprints when a crime is comitted AND it can additionally provide evidence you were NOT in said location if your status as a criminal is ever questioned.

      Your privacy is violated the minute they search without probable cause, regardless of what they're searching is your house or your fingertips. Period. What part of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, papers, and effects" don't you understand?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:So? by Asmodai · · Score: 1

      There's a large difference between having had to give your fingerprints because you were arrested or just cause you MIGHT do something.

      That's the first step you forgot to include in your story above and already shows a violation of privacy since you never had to give them before if you acted as a normal person not doing anything wrong.

      --
      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
    10. Re:So? by lahvak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the "match" found at an incriminating location.

      That depends what you mean by "incriminating location". Japan currently has a more or less democratic government, similar for example to the US, so at this moment this should not be a major problem. But in many other countries what they consider a "crime" you may actually consider a right thing to do. In such a case you would not want them to have your fingerprints.

      Also, they say they will share the fingerprints with other governments. Which means that next time you participate in disseminating political flyers criticising your increasingly oppressive government, it will be very easy for them to find who you are.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has around a 99% conviction rate. I wouldn't be so fast to think that you are so safe from false accusations there.

    12. Re:So? by caranha · · Score: 2, Informative

      That depends what you mean by "incriminating location". Japan currently has a more or less democratic government, similar for example to the US, so at this moment this should not be a major problem. But in many other countries what they consider a "crime" you may actually consider a right thing to do. In such a case you would not want them to have your fingerprints. I don't know how things are in the US, but Japan has a very alarming history of:
      - mistreating of arrested suspects (forced confessions, arrests for undefined lengths, denying lawyer contact, etc)
      - an extremely high conviction rate (if you are brought to the bench, you will very likely be convicted. Judges are proud of their conviction rates. Suspects are oriented to write confessions/apologies in order to get lighter punishments - even if they are innocent, etc)
      - a police force not accountable to anyone

      The above are true for japanese citizens, and doubly true for "damn foreigners who come to japan just to commit crimes".

      So, it is not a case of "they might get you for an unjust crime", but rather - "if someone points a finger at you, you are fsck'd". Since they are only fingerprinting foreigners, if they get to a crime scene, where there are japanese fingerprints (not recorded) and foreign fingerprints (recorded), guess what is going to happen.
    13. Re:So? by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some methods you list actually do have a negative impact on something. Gathering fingerprints at the airport will slow travellers down, probably for a minute or two. So? You are saying that those minutes are absolutely too valuable to be wasted in this way?

    14. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you live in a society, if that is too much for you to understand I suggest you go live in a cave idiot.

      The difference is not degree, You are not giving up any freedom whatsoever with a fingerprint, no more than you give up by the postoffice having your address to deliver your mail. OH DAMN, the mailman is violating me, he could tell the police where I live if I robbed someone. Your idiotic attempt to link searches of your house to what amounts to your personal signature is one of the more stupid things I have seen on slashdot in a while. The correct link would be to them recording your home address..... oh wait they already do that too. You are comparing actions to recording or verified recording of movement, the 2 do not compare.

    15. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a slippery slope analogy, it is a reductio ad absurdum.

      It works like this: you say X. But X implies Y, and Y is crazy and obviously untrue. Therefore X must also be untrue.

      Here, he said that fingerprinting was justified because it would help catch criminals. But if that is sufficient justification, then a lot of other things are justified, like random house searches or anal probes. Since most will reject the latter, then it is logically not sufficient justification for the former.

      Unlike the slippery slope, reductio ad absurdum is legitimate logic.

  4. Shared? by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So the Japanese fingerprint the Americans entering there and the US fingerprints the Japanese coming here, and then sharing is permitted. So in reality each government is getting access to its citizens fingerprints without violating any privacy laws.


    Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal?

    1. Re:Shared? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal? Yes. This sort of thing (including communications interception) has been going on for decades between many countries.
      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Shared? by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Legal" does not matter as soon as the "terror" word is used. At that point you don't even have the benefit of professional law enforcement and instead deal with untrained guys that want to be James Bond loosely supervised by horse judges.

    3. Re:Shared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal? Only if it's a Wednesday. Any other day of the week, you're free to feel perturbed.
    4. Re:Shared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. This sort of thing (including communications interception) has been going on for decades between many countries.

      Not just companies. There are rules about what kind of information can and can't be collected by the US government about its citizens. An obstacle to total information awareness? Not in this privatize-everything administration. Instead, the government simply subcontracts to obscure private data-mining companies such as this one who CAN collect any kind of information about us. The private contractors do all the work, the government doesn't break the law. Perfect right? Y'know, like privatizing the army? What could go wrong?

    5. Re:Shared? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal?

      In a word, yes.

      The conditions of entry into Japan are defined by Japan.

      The conditions for entry into the United States are defined by the United States.

      There is no such thing as a right to travel anonymously beyond your own borders.

    6. Re:Shared? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      Too bad more of my fellow countrymen can't pull their heads out of their asses and realize that the USofA doesn't run the rest of the world (and shouldn't), and other countries are entitled to make their own rules.

    7. Re:Shared? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about the sharing part. It effectively allows the US to start fingerprinting a larger subset of its population. Also, there is a difference between fingerprinting and not traveling anonymously.

    8. Re:Shared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the US of A was the first country to introduce rules like this, and others are now following. Each government can say to its own citizens that it's just retaliating against the US, but in fact they're all on the same side, building a huge international database of travelers.

    9. Re:Shared? by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal?

      When I was in the Finnish Army, one of our instructors said (bad translation): "Group punishment (that is, punishing the whole group when you can't figure out who's the real culprit) is forbidden, but there are ways around that."

      That was a moment of epiphany for me, the moment when I stopped respecting the law and the authority behind it. It was an insignificant incident in itself, but it certainly drove home that the authority is not my friend, but rather a mass of corruption, and should be avoided whenever possible in any of its forms. It was also the moment when whatever lingering remains of nationalism still existed in my heart died out for good. For all that I owe a debt of gratitude I can never repay to that instructor.

      So, don't hate your overlords, but learn from them. They want to get your fingerprints ? Forge them.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:Shared? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Seems to me you got the wrong message from that experience. There's deffinitely something wrong with a system in which the individual workers have to break the rules in order to properly do their job.

    11. Re:Shared? by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Am I supposed to just accept that this violation-by-proxy is legal?

      In a word, yes.

      The conditions of entry into Japan are defined by Japan.

      But this rule also applies to resident foreigners. When they entered Japan, this rule wasn't in force, but there's no grandfather clause for people alerady in Japan or even for permanent residents of fifty years' standing.

      In fact, even if you accept the "if you don't like Japan's rules for foreigners, become a citizen or leave" argument, people's rights are still being violated. This new law was publicized with about one month to go before being implemented, which hardly leaves enough time to tie up all of one's affairs and move away forever. Remember, they're even going to fingerprint departing foreigners! It takes a year or more of background checks and interviews to confer citizenship, so you can't stop being foreign either.

      Maybe if they had announced this year that the new rules would come into effect in 2010 or 2015 it would be understandable. Future tourists can change their travel plans if they don't like Japan's politics, but resident aliens have no such luxury.

    12. Re:Shared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But the US of A was the first country to introduce rules like this"

      You're a fucking idiot.

    13. Re:Shared? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Countries aren't single beings. Maybe some people don't want their countries to do this - I certainly don't want mine to introduce it.

      And anyone against fingerprinting people should be against this process - even if you don't care about foreigners, the point being made is that other countries are doing the same, and the net result is that all Governments get your fingerprints. Unless you never travel anywhere.

      The point is that "entitled to make their own rules" here leads to the Governments of the world getting everyone's fingerprints.

    14. Re:Shared? by fotbr · · Score: 0, Troll

      Loosen the tinfoil hat, I think its cutting off some much needed circulation.

    15. Re:Shared? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're THAT worried about your fingerprints, don't touch anything, anywhere, ever.

      If a government wants your fingerprints, it'll get them. Period.

    16. Re:Shared? by philpalm · · Score: 1

      Some mexicans have tried to "forge" their fingerprints but the results have just made them more noticeable..... Let's see if anyone tries to forge a thumprint to pass the thumbprint scanner...

    17. Re:Shared? by Sleet01 · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, all the recent security ramp-ups have been at the express "request" of the US government, just like Japan's reluctant support of the war in Iraq. If you have a complaint, best take it to your representatives here in the US (or wherever you might be).

      --
      -- Let him who is without spelling error ignite the first flame --
    18. Re:Shared? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      That's beside the point - if you're not bothered by this, then obviously you're not bothered by it, whether it's Japan, US or Outer Mongolia.

      For people who are bothered by it, saying "Other countries have a right to do it" or "The US did it, so it's okay if other countries do it" just doesn't make sense.

      And I'm sure I saw comments addressing your point - the problem is not someone finding my fingerprints, it's linking it to my identity and storing them together in a database.

    19. Re:Shared? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm just not bothered by it, considering the amount of stuff I touch every single day that could be linked to my identity and and the two "stored in a database". Lets see. Wallet. Contents of wallet. Keys to vehicle (with license plates linked to me), interior of vehicle (with license plates linked to me). And thats just getting to work in the AM. Add to that any receipts from things you purchased with a debit or credit card, and then throw away (and yeah I believe the last four digits of a card number is probably enough for the alphabet soup agencies to confirm that it is you, especially if they already think it belongs to you). Not to mention there's always the old way of simply arresting and processing you, and then letting you go -- "Sorry sir, honest mistake, you resembled the person who is wanted for _____________, have a nice day".

      If a government wants your prints (and identity, for whatever purpose) they'll get it. There's no point in getting pissed off about it.

      I don't really care who does it. A sovereign country shouldn't be required to respect every law of every other country. Period. If the Japanese government requires fingerprinting to enter or leave the land of the rising sun, then that is their prerogative. If other Americans get pissed off about it, too damned bad. They have no say in how the Japanese Government operates, which is how it should be.

    20. Re:Shared? by davidsyes · · Score: 1
      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    21. Re:Shared? by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      It'd be interesting to see what would happen if somebody (on the way out, permanently) decided to refuse to submit to fingerprinting (on the grounds that when they entered the country, it wasn't a requirement.)

      It's not like they can arrest you for refusing to provide information while LEAVING the country, which leaves them with the sole option of deportation. Fair enough, deport me; it's better than getting my fingerprints.

    22. Re:Shared? by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Michael, you'll presumably be kept in a holding cell and questioned about various inane things, missing your flight, before finally being deported. Could you be banned from the country for a number of years, like a visa overstayer would? Maybe.

      I wonder if refusing to submit to fingerprinting will actually be a crime in itself. The airport is still Japanese soil and they could construe such a refusal to be violation of Japanese law.

    23. Re:Shared? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you are. If you complain to either country they will give a nice little going away party in Tokyo Bay. But, if you want the lowdown go here http://www.gaijinpot.com/bb/search.php?searchid=856700

  5. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably yes, see http://www.immi-moj.go.jp/english/index.html under "New entry Procedures will start"

  6. The usual post by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you know that you leave fingerprints on everything you touch? Anyone can track you anywhere you go!!! All they have to do is "lift" the prints off the surface. It's a privacy nightmare.

    1. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think i wear glove when comiting murder.

      Post anymously for obvious reason.

    2. Re:The usual post by biocute · · Score: 1

      I use knuckles to push buttons, or at least twist my thumb after pushing a button.

    3. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do you think i wear glove when comiting murder.

      Post anymously for obvious reason.


      We know you did it, OJ.

    4. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will lift your fingerprints off all of your "Tentacle Dicked Schoolgirl Fucker" DVD's. Still, you'd be the rule and not the exception in Japan ;)

    5. Re:The usual post by Storlek · · Score: 1

      They can still get your prints after you've twisted your thumb. Also, I suppose you typed that post with your knuckles. Oh, and I bet you never touch your car keys, check your mailbox, open the front door, or take out the trash.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    6. Re:The usual post by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Did you know that you leave fingerprints on everything you touch? Anyone can track you anywhere you go!!! All they have to do is "lift" the prints off the surface. It's a privacy nightmare.

      I don't know if the rumor that snot on your finger makes it unreadable is true, but I'm going to try anyhow.

    7. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also renders you immune from unwanted handshakes and any other human contact, really. But then, you're on /. to begin with, which pretty much serves the same purpose.

    8. Re:The usual post by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Dexter, is that you?

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    9. Re:The usual post by rve · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dog semen is the best solution. Not only does it make your fingerprints unreadable, but it also obscures any DNA traces you might be leaving. Make sure your fingers are always dripping with the stuff.

    10. Re:The usual post by jadavis · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, it's not the fingerprints themselves that worry privacy advocates.

      The worry comes from creating a solid link between your fingerprint and the rest of the data that makes up your identity, and also from the centralization. Think if everyone had access to the central database.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    11. Re:The usual post by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      red rocket!

    12. Re:The usual post by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Hans Reiser?!

    13. Re:The usual post by hosecoat · · Score: 1
      "Dog semen is the best solution."

      Didn't you see the movie 'Seven'. The best solution is to slice your fingertips off with a razor blade on a daily basis. It makes getting through customs a snap.

    14. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what Google does? There'll be a "Google Fingerprints" service someday, linking your fingerprint to your Google Account.

    15. Re:The usual post by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Sorry to interject with semi-seriousness, but you can (eventually) destroy your fingerprints if you stick your fingers in pineapples all the time. Pineapples are high in bromelain which has the side effect of erasing your fingerprints over prolonged exposure.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    16. Re:The usual post by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      FYI: they'll be able to separate out non-human DNA. If you want this to work, you'll need human semen. (Not your own, obviously. That's already there anyway.)

      --
      The cake is a pie
    17. Re:The usual post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dog semen is the best solution"

      I knew a guy who said his dog needed relief and jerked the dog off regularly. He was not a good roommate, IMHO. Last I heard they found him next to his car waist deep in a pond in winter in Pennsylvania, screaming about something or other.

      Anecdotal, I know, but...

    18. Re:The usual post by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what Google does?

      Yes.

      Centralization does have advantages for some types of things, like finding information. But it's bad for things like the economy, privacy, and freedom.

      And you're right: when they try to gain centralized power, they will bundle it with convenience.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    19. Re:The usual post by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Dude I laughed so hard at your post I actually cried LOL

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  7. Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Lordplatypus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Frankly this sounds like a good idea to me. I really don't have a problem with it. Someone please explain why I should. How would this negatively affect me? Even if I were a criminal, I would just wear latex gloves while I was committing crimes.

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying, 'Nice doggie!' till you can find a rock.-- Wynn Catlin
  8. This policy sounds familiar... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. Mod parent up. by PineGreen · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod parent up, you privacy idiots. Show at least some fairness and stop modding up just privacy psychos and nobody else.

    1. Re:Mod parent up. by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      Nobody modded him down, just so you know. His Karma is a little low...

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
  10. Submit Citizen! by stox · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only the guilty need worry.

    And while I am at it, can I interest you in some Florida Condominiums?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Submit Citizen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it'll put a dent in the 419 scams and all the 419/barkers who hustle harlots in the soaplands? Maybe it'll lead to less swindlers who marry doe-eyed locals that locals of the opposite gender ignore.

    2. Re:Submit Citizen! by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      George Orwell was an optimist.

      At the rate things are going, I am beginning to fear that your sig is correct.

    3. Re:Submit Citizen! by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      I'll trade you my deed to the Brooklyn Bridge for those condos. Well, do we have a deal? ...

      "1984" was not supposed to be a how-to book.

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  11. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by A+Pancake · · Score: 1

    It probably will never negatively effect you. However, some people object to being treated like a criminal for no apparent reason.

  12. high and mighty by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why are you acting all high-and-mighty? When I came to the US, I was fingerprinted.

    Was it pleasant? No. Was it a big deal? Not really. I figure if the US wants to throw me in Guantanamo Bay, them having my fingerprints is the least of my problems.

    So if the US does it, why not Japan?

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:high and mighty by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because the US is the land of the free

      ...

      ...

      What? Why are you laughing so hard.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:high and mighty by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Japan has gone further. Not only are visitors fingerprinted and photographed but also foreign residents like my friend Terrie LLoyd in the second article who has been there for almost a quarter of a century and who has started several successful companies that employ Japanese citizens.

      What is most irritating is that Japan really doesn't have reason to fear an international terrorist incident on their soil. As Terrie says, all the terrorist incidents in Japan have been done by Japanese and the amount of crime by foreigners in Japan is minuscule compared to the overall total.

      This is xenophobia pure and simple and will kill whatever tourist industry Japan was trying to get with their "Yokoso Japan!" campaign. A lot of businesses will avoid Japan because of these regulations as business travellers definitely do not like being treated as criminals.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    3. Re:high and mighty by NaCh0 · · Score: 0

      Freedom has its price.

    4. Re:high and mighty by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Yep, and too many people have cashed in.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    5. Re:high and mighty by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I can't say I'm surprised about the xenophobia claim with respect to Japan. I've heard it anecdotally from several angles, that a lot of Japanese history has ingrained xenophobia into some parts of the Japanese culture and psyche. Most people groups have it to some degree, it seems to be more marked than usual in Japan.

    6. Re:high and mighty by cralewyth · · Score: 1

      Yup, your privacy is free to be taken from you.

      Wait, looking back that looks more serious than intended. Mods beware!

      --
      "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
    7. Re:high and mighty by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      When I was in Japan I stayed with a Japanese family I didn't know before then (it was through my school). Those people were as king as everyone else I met in Japan with them being as nice as Australians or Americans. I found no more xenophobia in Japan then I did in America. In fact I find more here in Australia :(

    8. Re:high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily, whether the US should do it and whether Japan should do it are independent questions (Which both IMO have the answer 'no'), so we can simplify your question down to 'Why not Japan'? There's some good answers here already.

      I've been avoiding traveling to the US for years now, it's getting a much less desirable travel goal with the increasing paranoia and fear-mongering, and I'm sure the discomfort of criminal record check and fingerprinting are only the icing on the iceberg. Not much of a boycott, really, there's not that much that I want to see there anyway.

      I've been trying to take train when I can rather than flying, too. Whenever I fly security always seem to feel the need to rummage to my bag, have me take of my shoes, dance like a monkey, etc. It's not like they're going to find anything, but I have a strong sense of privacy, and I'm rather uncomfortable with people going through my stuff.

      As for Japan, they're hardly notorious xenophiles over there either. And they don't let people with criminal backgrounds enter, either. Still, at least they're assholes with a history. I'd like to visit there someday, but having my biometric data permanently stored and indiscriminately shared for unspecifed purposes is a big turn-off. So yeah, this is kind of an inconvenience for me personally. Not high-and-mighty, just kind of disappointed that I'll either have to give up a chunk of privacy I've managed to keep so far, or give up on visiting Japan.

      So why shouldn't the US, Japan, airlines and others treat travelers like suspected terrorist criminal crap? One reason is because it discourages traveling. This kind of hostility does decourage tourism. And I'm sure it shrinks the available foreign talent pool from places like Europe, where individual privacy has been considered important (ignoring the UK). Who would want to work in a country that takes your fingerprints on entry? Additionally, the idea of the government harvesting exploitable information like fingerprints and DNA from everyone are by many regarded as problematic in itself, and is a prominent feature in much dystopian fiction. You may feel none of these are a problem. Enjoy your isolationistic police state.

    9. Re:high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the amount of crime by foreigners in Japan is minuscule compared to the overall total.
      Funny. Why do you like to compare the amount?

      0.76% of all Chinese in Japan are criminals. On the other hands, 0.05% of all Japanese in Japan. 15 times higher! So when you meet a Japanese person in Japan, probably you're safe. If you see a Chinese in Japan, run away asap.
    10. Re:high and mighty by fbjon · · Score: 1

      The xenophobia in more conservative circles is perhaps more heavy than around where you stayed. Specifically, conservative government circles.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    11. Re:high and mighty by sam_at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      True!!

    12. Re:high and mighty by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Informative

      You were a visitor. You weren't staying there very long and I don't know how much Japanese you were able to learn and in which environments you found yourself but obviously you weren't there long enough to proceed to phase 2 of the Gaijin experience in Japan.

      This happens when you REALLY start to learn to speak Japanese and start to talk to more of the citizens. When you get a job and have to do things like look for housing or deal with banks. Then the xenophobia starts to rear its ugly head. Landlords refuse to rent to you simply because you are a foreigner. You begin to understand the racist muttering from the older folks. You notice the condescending and discriminatory depiction of non-Japanese on the TV shows. Many gaijin go home at this point

      Phase 3 begins when you accept that this is the reality of Japan and find ways to work around it. You move to the more progressive areas and modify your behaviour to fit better into the society. If you can get to this stage you will have a life-long love of Japan and all the wonderful things it has (geek toys, hot springs, and food, oh God the food!) despite all the negative aspects (pollution, crowding, expense, racism).

      Eventually you may still move back to your country as some things cannot be overcome. In our case it was the education of our children. There was just no way we could put our kids through the Japanese school system and the living space we had was just too small to be comfortable. Hindsight has shown this to be a very wise move especially considering the experience of our kids when they have gone back to Japan for short-term attendance at Japanese schools.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    13. Re:high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's wrong. My ant, a German living for about 50 years in the USA, was fingerprinted also. So the USA is not better than Japan.

    14. Re:high and mighty by lordholm · · Score: 1

      I do not think that businesses will avoid Japan, they are not really avoiding the U.S. at the moment, despite the same applies there.

      Hopefully more Americans will now see what their own policies instills on tourists and business travelers, and maybe people will start calling for change in the U.S.

      In the EU, we do not have this yet. On the other hand in the EU they will soon start fingerprinting all citizens that want a passport (though according to at least the state that I come from, the prints will only be stored on the passport).

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    15. Re:high and mighty by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I was going to reply to your post, and then I saw the spoiler in your sig. *sigh*. Now I just have to add you to my foe list instead.

    16. Re:high and mighty by chitokutai · · Score: 1

      Don't worry JohnFluxx. Just go ahead and read the book and I'm sure you'll still be thoroughly interested. I can't get into details without adding more spoilers though.

    17. Re:high and mighty by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      You know, I've had sigs turned off for a while now (I don't even remember when I did it) and I don't recall putting in that particular text as a sig as I'm just not like that. Maybe I've been sig-hacked.

      As long as I can remember my sig was:

      Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.
      Those who live in the past are already repeating it.

      - Me in one of my more lucid moments.

      I would like to see your response.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    18. Re:high and mighty by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      "On the other hands, 0.05% of all Japanese in Japan."

      Only 0.05%? No wonder their birthrate's declining, everyone's running away so there's less people to copulate.

      The joys of taking a quote out of context...

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    19. Re:high and mighty by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      ...business travellers definitely do not like being treated as criminals.

      Now this is the thinking you need to get rid of. Just because police takes fingerprints from criminals doesn't mean by taking fingerprints you are labeled criminal. It's normal to leave fingerprints. It's cool.

      If business travelers were intimidated for hours with tough questions, that would be treating them like criminals. Or, on the other hand, quite normal for people outside the US who travel there. Nevermind. Well, throwing people into jail for a couple of days, now that's treating like a criminal.

    20. Re:high and mighty by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Phase 4 is when the novelty wears off. You suddenly realize that Asian porn doesn't do it for you any more and you need pictures with a blonde or a redhead with a big, fat ass. And breasts. Man, do you need breasts.

    21. Re:high and mighty by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Phase 5 is where you don't care about how small Japanese women's chests are and start noticing how good Japanese women can keep looking as they get older.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    22. Re:high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens when you REALLY start to learn to speak {English} and start to talk to more of the citizens. When you get a job and have to do things like look for housing or deal with banks. Then the xenophobia starts to rear its ugly head. Landlords refuse to rent to you simply because you are a {Arabic}. You begin to understand the racist muttering from the {white} folks. You notice the condescending and discriminatory depiction of {Muslims} on the TV shows. Many {middle-easterns} {reject the American culture} at this point

      Phase 3 begins when you accept that this is the reality of {the United States} and find ways to work around it. You move to the more progressive areas and modify your behaviour to fit better into the society. If you can get to this stage you will have a life-long love of {America} and all the wonderful things it has (geek toys, hot {chicks}, and {Tex-Mex} food, oh God the {Tex-Mex} food!) despite all the negative aspects (pollution, crowding, expense, racism).
    23. Re:high and mighty by anti-pop-frustration · · Score: 1

      >This is xenophobia pure and simple and will kill whatever tourist industry Japan was trying to get with their "Yokoso Japan!" campaign.

      How about getting of of these fingerprint-friendly "Yokoso Japan!" t-shirts?

      In order to let the Government of Japan and the airport drones know how you feel about their latest "effort".

    24. Re:high and mighty by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      It will once again be free if we get Ron Paul elected!

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  13. *sigh* by theNetImp · · Score: 1

    *grumble* I leave for japan in a month for 2 weeks, I really don't like this, but I love visiting Japan, and guess not visiting would be worse to me. :-(

    Sometimes you have to make sacrifices when you enjoy something or someplace. :-(.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Kintar1900 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes you have to make sacrifices when you enjoy something or someplace. :-(.

      Thank you for exemplifying the attitude that lets governments get away with this shit. Do you really think Japan (or the US, for that matter) would continue this blatant abuse of their visiters' privacy if a majority of tourists decided they'd rather spend their money in a country that doesn't treat them like criminals?

      The "there's nothing I can do about it, so I'll just live with it" attitude is at least as much to blame for these problems as corrupt governments.

    2. Re:*sigh* by BROOW · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Despite the fact that my career could benefit by traveling to e.g. the US, I refuse to do so. So now how am I going to bring this to my Japanese wife...

    3. Re:*sigh* by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      OK, so tell me then, what can I do about it? I'm not a citizen of their country, I have no say in how they run their country. What am I suppose to do. I'm not going to give up going to visit friends and see places I want to see. I don't plan on committing any crimes while I'm there, so it's not like it's going to affect me all that much.

      What is so corrupt about a government trying to protect it's citizens from non citizens? I don't really agree with how they are doing it, but what do you really think I can do about it?

    4. Re:*sigh* by Kintar1900 · · Score: 1

      What am I suppose to do.

      The only things you can do about it are the things you've already stated you won't do about it. Don't visit Japan. Get your friends/family to agree that the measure is extreme and either work as citizens of Japan to change the law, or immigrate to a nation that isn't doing these things. Granted, that second option is likely to get progressively more difficult over the next few years.

      I don't plan on committing any crimes while I'm there, so it's not like it's going to affect me all that much. What is so corrupt about a government trying to protect it's citizens from non citizens?

      Nothing. The problem is in how it's done, and the potentials for abuse. I don't plan on committing any crimes in Japan, either, but I'm not going to enter a country that is so obviously paranoid about foreigners and has the ability to track every move I make while I'm there. The problem is that this kind of law steadily erodes your ability to prove you didn't do something if you're falsely accused. As a previous poster mentioned, it's already pretty freaking hard to do that in Japan even if you're a citizen. 99% conviction rate for arrests in Japan? Surely we can't think that the Japanese have nearly infallible law enforcement! And now you want to submit to mandatory fingerprinting? No thanks.

  14. The US has been doing this for a while now. by NimbleSquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How exactly is this different to what the US does to foreign visitors?

    When the US started to fingerprint foreign travellers, a whole bunch of countries threatened to do that to visting US citizens. It is nice to see Japan follow through with their threat, albeit a few years later (although they are not just focussing on US citizens). I can see a bunch of Americans getting really upset about this and declaring they'll never travel to Japan, but what the Japanese Government are doing is really no different than what the US Government is doing to everyone else.

    Personally I don't like being treated as a criminal. However, as much as I could complain about it, it won't be stopping me from travelling.

    1. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by dancingmad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, Americans get high and mighty about these stories, but I am an American citizen (but of South Asian descent) and traveling between the U.S. and Japan with my American passport I have been treated pretty well up until now in Japanese airports (my parents on the other hand, who are not American citizens, got questioned pretty thorougly leaving Japan after visiting me, but my American passport-ed brother flew by), whereas I get grilled in the U.S. It sucks to be stuck in the crossfire, and I am sad that this place I love living is becoming more like the U.S., but the Americans started this stupid airport mess. And it's still better than always getting selected for "random" screening and taking off my shoes.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 2

      Well, everyone is used to the US being a Jackass to the international community, but Japan is supposed to be so polite.

    3. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by lahvak · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this different to what the US does to foreign visitors?

      It's not, but just because one country does something bad and stupid does not mean every country should be doing the same.

      (although they are not just focussing on US citizens)

      Exactly! Which means that they re not "following through with their threat". I would understand if they fingerprinted only us, or painted our faces blue upon arrival or something, to retaliate for the US fingerprinting, but what they are doing is equally stupid to what our government is doing. In fact, I think they claim they are going to share the data with our government. How in the world is that a retaliation for US fingerprinting of visitors?

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this different to what the US does to foreign visitors?

      They do that? How come I've never been fingerprinted then?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Perhaps you haven't been there in a while. I have had my photograph taken and index finger scan for the last
      two years on US entry.

      I try to avoid going there as a result, but it's not always possible.

    6. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I haven't been there since 2002. I take it you can avoid that by going to Canada and crossing the border?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by yorugua · · Score: 1
    8. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the Americans started this stupid airport mess

      Stupid Americans giving us commercial air travel and the ability to be on the other side of the world in a reasonable time! DAMN YOU!

    9. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this different to what the US does to foreign visitors?

      Um, where is anyone saying it is different?

      Everytime that something about civil rights with a non-US country comes up, we always get someone trying to start a strawman argument and turn it into a competition. It's not a competition.

      If country A does something bad, it's bad. Slashdot story.

      If country B also does something bad, it's also bad. Another Slashdot story. Two bad things is worse than one bad thing - they don't cancel each other out. A Government doing things we don't like is not excused because our (or your) Government does it too!

      If it makes American's uphappy, I only hope it makes them less willing to support the US policies. But the US citizens don't make the rules. Most citizens could oppose it, but the Governments would still be happy taking people's fingerprints.

      The only way this is a competition is one where the citizens of both countries are losing. And your sort of logic just helps this along.

      Hasn't it also occured to you that maybe it's not just US posters opposed to this? Japanese users have left comments, and I'm from the UK. I also suspect that any US people opposed to this were also opposed to US fingerprinting. If you can find a person who opposes this but supported that, then fine, but otherwise you're arguing against a strawman.

    10. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would understand if they fingerprinted only us

      I wouldn't, because as one smart person once said...

      [J]ust because one country does something bad and stupid does not mean every country should be doing the same.

      Now, who said that?...

      Of course, one would have to first prove that finger printing visitors makes any sort of difference besides a waste of tax money. Yup, taking your finger print or photo. Wow, that's going to change the fucking world! Its like like half the people haven't posted that and more on their MySpace page!

    11. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by HumanPenguin · · Score: 1

      Err that is the way it has always been world wide. You are a citizen of a country you get in easy if not you have to go through customs. Get questioned etc etc. Fingerprinting all forign citizens is newish and the US beat most everyone else to it so they cant complain. But treating forign citizens with less trust then local is common and always has been. Heck we had a news article a while back that nigeria turned away Bill Gates because he had no proof that he would not settle. I still grin at that one.

    12. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but Japan is supposed to be so polite.

      Wait, you mean the island country that sided with the Nazi's 50 years ago, who is obsessed with robots because they dont want filthy foreigners/cheap labor taking care of their elderly, and the country so obsessed with with whaling that they put it under the guise of research?

      Yeah, real polite.

      Look put down the candy bar, turn on the lights in your mom's basement, and shut off the anime. Take a good look at Japan. Its a xenophobic messed up perverted society. This move comes as absolutely no surprise to the non-fanboys.

    13. Re:The US has been doing this for a while now. by Britling · · Score: 1

      The difference between Japan and the USA is that in Japan, almost all foreigners are fingerprinted, whereas in the USA lawful permanent residents are exempt. The Japanese system excludes kids under 16, diplomats, and a special category of permanent residents created for mainly ethnic Koreans left over from Japan's pre-World War II occupation of Korea. See also fears that it'll be bad for Japanese business.

      In the UK, fingerprints are taken from visa applicants in their home country. If you do not require a visa to visit the UK (e.g. European Union citizens), you will not have to undergo fingerprinting and iris scans.

  15. The American way is better by jihadist · · Score: 1

    "We require these fingerprints for your health insurance," he said. "But of course, since our atmospheric pollutants have raised the cancer rate to 50%, you'll probably want that cancer insurance, unless you want to go bankrupt as you die of voracious tumors which suspiciously resemble health care executives." His smile flashed the wisdom of Satan and the plaintive honesty of Jesus Christ, and I could not resist.

  16. Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have permanent resident status in Japan. This is the equivalent of a landed immigrant in most countries, however it is more permanent as you essentially have it for the rest of your life unless you become a Japanese citizen or leave Japan without a re-entry permit. This status takes a very long time to get (5-10 years) and requires you to submit tons of personal information and have Japanese guarantors. One of the benefits has been that you can line up at the Japanese citizens counters at airport immigration and be through very quickly. (My record: plane to train in under 5 minutes)

    Despite this, from this Tuesday I will be required to line up with the regular foreign tourists and have my picture and fingerprints taken every time I enter Japan and every time I *leave* Japan.

    Also, I still have to make sure I have a re-entry permit which I have to get every 3 years or I will lose my status completely.

    All of this because I *might* be a terrorist or criminal.

    The one thing I wonder is, if I pass away during a trip abroad are they going to take my picture and fingerprints when they bring my body back to the nice gravesite in rural Gumma prefecture where I'm going to be buried when I die?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So become a fucking citizen. It only takes 3 years to get permanent residency if you're the spouse of a Japanese national and after that you can work towards the requirements needed to become a citizen. if you're living here in Japan you should enjoy the benefits being a citizen entails. If you're unwilling to give up your citizenship of your country of origin go the fuck back there and quit bitching.

      In other words, put your money where your mouth is.

    2. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by MochaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Japan is one of few countries that maintain that you must renounce all other citizenship to become a citizen. Dual-citizenship is only permissible for children born to a Japanese and foreign couple, and only then until age 20, after which the individual is given two years to renounce one or the other.

      Accept Japanese citizenship -- thanks but no thanks, I'd rather have the flexibility of my existing Canadian passport. If it means my whole family has to pack its bags and we move back to Canada, so that I can stop having my taxes go to support a repressive government that treats me like a criminal, I'll happily leave Japan to the demographic disaster looming on the horizon.

      Given this country's low birthrate, aging population, and pension plan on the brink of collapse, immigration is the only answer. If the Japanese government believes that it can sustain population/economic growth while treating immigrants like criminals, this country will get what it deserves. The rest of us will be watching it collapse from the countries we've returned home to.

    3. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by havill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hi, I live in Japan too. Some comments on your post, which didn't contain anything false but it did contain a few exaggerations:

      1) You don't have to be a permanent resident to go through the "Japanese" line at Immigration. All you need is a re-entry permit. A person on a 3-month Entertainer visa can go through the JP Citizen line if they have a re-entry permit.

      2) It doesn't necessarily take five to ten years to get permanent residency. The path that most permanent residents take is to marry a Japanese. In that case, 3 years of being married to a Japanese (with one year of that residing in Japan). To compare, in 2000 the U.S. required two years of marriage (but no residency requirement) for my Japanese spouse to receive permanent residency. Easier, but not that different.

      3) You don't know that you will be required to line up with regular foreigners in the immigration line to get fingerprinted.

      4) Lining up in the Japanese line is not always faster. Depending on the flights coming in, the Alien/Foreigner lines are sometimes faster and/or smaller. The big benefits you get from permanent residency is a) not needing a visa or a reason (job or spouse) to be in Japan and b) (making it easier to) qualify for home/business loans and consumer credit.

      5) The re-entry permit length for permanent residency is not always three years. It lasts until you have to renew your permanent residency status. Usually five years. In comparison, a permanent resident of the U.S. (may) lose their status if they're out of the U.S. for more than a year, unless they can prove a residual tie or they have a re-entry permit. The U.S. re-entry permit lasts only two years. And it's much more expensive (>$150 for one-time use max 2 year US re-entry permit vs ¥3000 for a JP one-timer or ¥6000 for multiple-use permit).

      One last thing: you obviously haven't lived in Japan for a very long time, as the non-fingerprinting of foreigners is a new post Y2K phenomenon. Granted, in the past it was done at the Ward Office and put on your Alien Registration Card.

      To compare, as an American citizen, I've been fingerprinted for all sorts of jobs: working as a substitute public teacher during college and working at an investment bank. Many Americans whose jobs deal with law enforcement, children, or handling large amounts of money are required to submit to fingerprinting (and often drug tests).

      * Also: UNDER FIVE minutes from plane to train? C'mon, even without a single human obstacle in your way, that's at least a sprint/race-walk pace from the jetway and down a lot of hallways and escalators to either the Keisei line or the JR line.

    4. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      btw, you could have queued always on the "japanese" side with a valid visa. I always did this. But these nice times are over ... back to the pool of terrorists with me ...

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    5. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah my friend, Japanese government surrendered to the US Big Bullies once more! The Ameri-Nazis, as they are not happy enough to torture, illegally eavesdrop, jail without right to bail or a court, and all the other GESTAPO things they doing to their own people, Citizens or non-Citizens, now they want to export their tyranny worldwide.
      This is the new Tyranny-on-a-can. The new product "made in the USA" arriving to your country soon...

    6. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by webagogue · · Score: 1

      Not that I necessarily disagree with you (have lived in Tokyo for the past 6.5 years, btw) and this is OT, but have you ever wondered by Japan seems to be furiously working on robotics?

      --

      Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
    7. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      that great bastion of freedom called the netherlands requires you to renounce any other citizenships as well.

    8. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily.

      I know plenty of people with dual Dutch-Australian citizenship. The Dutch laws were relaxed in 2003 to allow this.

    9. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by davidfromoz · · Score: 1

      You may want to check that "can line up at the Japanese Citizen counters" benefit too. I believe thats out the window when this change goes into effect.

      cheers,
      David

    10. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say US fares any better in their treatment to immigrants. I personally am in the process of getting a green card for my wife(who is of foreign decent), it is over two years of being treated like a criminal with INS (now the Dept of Homeland Security).

      Its easy to judge when you're the immigrant, but no so much when the shoe is on the other foot. Or judge the country that you are not the immigrant.

    11. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Koutarou · · Score: 0

      Fortunately the US considers renunciation of citizenship under these circumstances as being made under duress and routinely issues new passports to those who have done so.

      Or is it they don't want to lose a source of tax revenue?

    12. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Comments on your comments:

      1. I didn't say that others with different visas couldn't do this as well. As you say anyone with a re-entry permit can, but then you have to explain the re-entry permit system to everyone. The only real point is that a special ability that you were granted as a resident of Japan is now being taken away and the value of your status in Japan has been reduced to nil as far as airport immigration is concerned. You, me and those lovely Filipino "entertainers" will have to shift over to the visitor counters.

      2. Get real. That four years is a theoretical minimum that almost never applies in practice. It took me 5 years and I was married to a Japanese and already had one kid. My friends have all taken MUCH longer. The requirements to get a Permanent Residence have also become MUCH stricter as of late.

      3. Yes I do. There has been a LOT of discussion about this on JapanProbe.com, JapanToday.com and JapanTimes.com. Although current residents have spotted the camera and fingerprint machines at the Japanese passport counters they has been no guarantee that they will be used there unless there is an overflow of foreign tourists. We'll see in a couple of days when the lines at immigration stretch back to the planes.

      4. That's obvious, You'll always pick the the shorter lines but every single time I've entered over the past 10 years the Japanese lines have always been shorter. In any case I've never found the visitor counters faster. if you're heading over to the Japanese counters they can assume you already are legit.

      5. This is confusing. You don't renew a permanent resident permit. The maximum length of a re-entry permit is 3 years for regular visa holders and permanent residents. There is a 5-year re-entry permit that can only be obtained by Special Permanent Residents (The resident Koreans for the most part). The validity of a multiple re-entry permit can usually only be affected by the expiry of your Alien Registration Card or passport.

      Your last two points made me chuckle. I have already been fingerprinted by the Ward office. I started living permanently in Japan in 1986. The advancement we permanent residents were able to achieve by the removal of the fingerprinting requirement is now being taken away. The most important point to remember is that Japanese are NEVER fingerprinted unless they have been found guilty of a crime. I don't know for certain that Japanese applying for high-security positions aren't fingerprinted but knowing the cultural stigma associated with it, I think it unlikely. The usual excuse is that the Japanese have koseki so they don't need that form of identification.

      And finally, yes, it is possible and I time myself to try and set a new record but that will no longer be possible. A sub 5-minute transition requires it just being myself with only a backpack at a brisk jog from the jetway without having to take the shuttle at terminal 2. No-one lined up at the Japanese and re-entrant's immigration counters with a friendly young male officer who tend to want to get rid of you quicker then a run down the escalators and use the same young male officer trick at customs walking up to him with passport open at the eijukyouka page and saying "Konnichiwa, eijusha desu kedo, kyou shucho kara kaetekimashita. That gets me through without them even opening my pack. Then it's just another little sprint down to the Skyliner ticket counter.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    13. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that even permanent residence had to be renewed every three years, just like any other Japanese visa? It used to be that any Japanese visa beyond tourist would allow you to stand in the citizen's line (up until now.)

      Interestingly enough, I was told in America that they definitely wanted my Japanese wife and I to go through the citizen's line in customs, otherwise it mucks up the paperwork. ("It says here you're traveling with family, where are they?")

      Also, I was offended to see a sign in Japanese in Kansai Airport this last summer that apologized to other Japanese if they had to wait behind foreigners before getting processed. I guess the number of visa-carrying foreigners is increasing and putting the natives out. It's not the sentiment that bothers me, it's the audacity of posting the sign.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    14. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, the permanent resident stamp (eijyuu kyouka) is the holy grail of foreign status in Japan. You can work, get loans and mortgages and as long as you renew your Alien Registration Card (Gaikokujin Torokusho) every seven years and have a valid re-entry permit when you go out of Japan for any reason it can be for the rest of your life. I've had to transfer mine several times between my passports which every 5 years.

      I found a n announcement note that claims initially they may allow families with at least one Japanese parent and a re-entry holder and kids under 16 to use the Japanese citizens line. (and potentially bypass fingerprinting) Don't want the kids asking why Daddy is being treated like a criminal.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    15. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Ditto Germany.
      There is an exception: If a German nationality takes a second nationality, this is ok.

      The German constitution states that Germans may not have their nationality taken away from them, that is in the constitution because it was a favourite trick of the Nazis and the founding fathers wanted to rule that out in the future.
      I met someone a few years ago with dual German/US citizenship. Her father had been posted to the US by his company (Lufthansa) and she was born while the family was there. The family later returned to Germany.
      I also knew someone with German/Israeli citizenship. Her family left the USSR for Germany and she took German citizenship. Later she also acquired Israeli citizenship.
      There was a government minister a few years ago with Brazilian (?) + German. It was at the state rather than national level but the same would have applied.

      Where that went horribly wrong for some people was: It was accepted practice for a while for Turkish people who wanted German nationality to temporarily renounce their Turkish nationality and then reacquire it later. The reason they needed their Turkish nationality was that it is difficult to inherit property in Turkey without the nationality. They were held to have acquired German nationality under false pretences and lost their nationality again.

      Some wingnuts in Germany are talking about introducing similar legislation (fingerprinting) in Germany. Not sure what their chances are.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    16. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bullshit. We've got a few Hitler-wanna-be's that keep spouting that nonsense in hopes of getting the populist vote.

      We've got lots of silly rules before you can apply for the dutch nationality, like having lived (legally) in the Netherlands for no less than 15 years, but you do not need to renounce other nationalities. Yet.

    17. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Japan for 8 years and every once in a while a story like this comes along to remind my why I moved back to Canada.

      I remember when they FINALLY got rid of the fingerprint on the Gaijin card.
      Then a few years ago they sneakily added that "Are you a criminal" set of questions on the back of the re-entry card.
      So every non-Japanese the re-enters has to answer "I have not committed a crime, etc..." every time they re-enter, even if out of the country for a few days.
      Now this happens.

      Honestly, this doesn't surprise me.
      If you honestly think that the US is xenophobic, you don't know the Japanese.
      This 911/terror crap is just another excuse to restrict foreginers and get rid of their "harmful influence" on the poor "innocent" Japanese...
      At lest the US is trying to control everyone .... in Japan you are guilty until proven Japanese.
      Unforntuatly everyone seems to forget that the worst terrorist attack on Japanese was the Sarin gas attacks in the Tokyo subway in 1995 ... committed ENTIRELY by JAPANESE cult members.

    18. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ArwynH · · Score: 1

      Robots - The Salaryman of the Future!

    19. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by k.blueice · · Score: 1

      In fact, if you hold a re-entry permit, or are a citizen, it might actually turn out quicker to get through with the new system (and make your 5 minute dash something that isnt pure fiction!). Why? Becuase if you fill out the correct form beforehand (one off requirement) you can go through an automated gate. Which in the long run could well turn out far quicker, if there is a lot of them... see here: http://www.moj.go.jp/NYUKAN/nyukan63-3.pdf

    20. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by hchaput · · Score: 1
      Japan is one of few countries that maintain that you must renounce all other citizenship to become a citizen. Dual-citizenship is only permissible for children born to a Japanese and foreign couple, and only then until age 20, after which the individual is given two years to renounce one or the other.

      I don't know how few it is, but America is also among them. To quote USC 8, 1448, The Oath of renunciation and allegiance: "A person who has applied for naturalization shall, in order to be and before being admitted to citizenship, take in a public ceremony before the Attorney General or a court with jurisdiction under section 1421 (b) of this title an oath (1) to support the Constitution of the United States; (2) to renounce and abjure absolutely and entirely all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which the applicant was before a subject or citizen; (3) to support and defend the Constitution and the laws of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; ..."

    21. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Japan is one of few countries that maintain that you must renounce all other citizenship to become a citizen. Dual-citizenship is only permissible for children born to a Japanese and foreign couple, and only then until age 20, after which the individual is given two years to renounce one or the other.

      Accept Japanese citizenship -- thanks but no thanks, I'd rather have the flexibility of my existing Canadian passport.


      Being an American and not knowing Canadian law, this may or may not apply to you. Countries that allow for dual citizenship usually don't recognize requirements to renounce citizenship to become a citizen of another country. For example, some years ago I talked to British and French colleagues at the job I had at the time and they told me how they were required to "renounce" their British or French citizenship to become American citizens, but their country did not recognize this renunciation and considered them to be dual citizens.

      The US Supreme Court finally ruled on the subject of dual citizenship early in the 1990s. The US government position at the time was that dual citizenship was not legal for Americans. The Supreme Court ruled that it was in a fascinating ruling. They also ruled that US citizenship is not renounced if you become a citizen of another country and are forced to renounce your American citizenship to do so. They ruled that such actions are considered to be "under duress" and US citizenship is not lost. In fact it's actually quite difficult to give up your US citizenship and you have to follow some very specific guidelines to renounce it legally or you are still considered to have it. Basically the default position is once an American, always an American unless you go to extreme, fully documented measures to renounce it. I don't know Canadian law, but surely Canada recognizes dual citizenship and as such would not accept your "renunciation" of it just to become a Japanese citizen. Or are you going to tell me that the USA has a more enlightened approach to this?

    22. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the books so does the US. Not so sure if this link is 100% correct (pulled it off a quick search) but I remember reading/hearing something like this before: http://www.richw.org/dualcit/law.html ... under the heading "Citizenship by naturalization (INA 337, 8 USC 1448)"

      Granted, in practice it doesn't seem to be used. I guess the US is a nation with too many laws.

    23. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      Canada does allow dual citizenship. My guess as to Canada's policy on this is "we won't tell if you don't, but realize that you'd be breaking the law in Japan (but not in Canada)"

    24. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by BROOW · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true.

    25. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The US also, in theory, requires that you renounce all foreign citizenship. Of course, this is roundly ignored by other countries.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    26. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      "Eijuusha" darou :p

    27. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Maa ne.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    28. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a canadian and dual Canadian/British citizen, as is my room-mate.

      Many countries have the "renouce all other citizenships" in their oaths, which means that if I try to move to the US, I'm staying a permanent resident thank you, not a citizen.

      My wife though who was born an american can become a canadian citizen without losing her status as canada has no such clause.

    29. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi
      I hate to break this to you, but any regular resident foreigner in Japan - even those on one year visas could also line up with the Japanese. It was not something entitled to permanent status residents only

    30. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Canada does not care what you tell some yahoo from the USA - in order to renounce your Canadian citizenship you have to do some pretty specific things in front of a Canadian official. In the other direction, the US State Department maintains that taking out foreign citizenship is enough to lose your USA citizenship, but court rulings have repeatedly said that for any of the "forbidden" actions the the SD claims will cause a loss of citizenship, there has to be a clear intent on the part of the citizen to give up that citizenship. Thus, you are probably both safe in taking out citizenship in the other's country and retaining your citizenship in your own.

    31. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of us will be watching it collapse from the countries we've returned home to.

      Well, *trying* to watch its collapse, from our 3G "video" cellphones and 768Kbps "broadband" DSL connections.

      Ooh, look, another packet! I think I saw some economic collapse there!

      Dude this sucks. Let's go watch some anime from bittorrent.

    32. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by havill · · Score: 1

      Let's not be a rmaji/rômazi/roomaji/rohmaji spelling nazi now. :) (apparently anything outside of Latin-1 is filtered by Slashdot's renderer)

      If you really want to get pedantic, he missed the double-t () in a couple places as well. But how well you type Japanese in latin letters is irrelevant for useful communication anyway because anything longer than one or two words for tourists or brand names is written in kana/kanji. I see romanization mistakes by Japanese all the time in Japan. Because most Japanese aren't reading/checking that part..

      I'm sure when he types or speaks real Japanese it's just fine.

      The point he was making is if you speak better than tourist-level Japanese, you usually get through JP immigration/customs faster.

      However, if you complain about the fingerprinting process to immigration in any language, you're not going to get through any quicker (if at all). :-p

    33. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by alexo · · Score: 1

      in order to renounce your Canadian citizenship you have to do some pretty specific things in front of a Canadian official.

      Pervert!
    34. Re:Let me tell you how ridiculous this is... by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      you are so wrong it's not even funny.
      When applying for the dutch nationality you have to present proof that you have applied to lose your old one, this is from personal experience. (Polish wife).

  17. Thanks to the US by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Japanese are not known to waste time and resources on what I'd call useless ventures, but this thumb print routine appears to be right from my president and the Neocon's cook book.

    Very soon, they will realize that taking thumb prints has no effect at deterring a man ready to "meet his God" or "getting rewarded with 70 virgins", just like the we did.

    Trouble is, it will become quite apparent very late in time. Thanks to the US.

    1. Re:Thanks to the US by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      This isn't thumb. It's left and right index fingers.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Thanks to the US by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

      LOL,

      The Japanese are known for wasting both time and money on useless ventures. It is almost a Halmark of being Japanese!

      Hmmmm where shall we start....

      http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/420236/all

      http://inventorspot.com/articles/melody_road_gives_whole_new_mean_8235

      http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=622

      This Fingerprinting and photographing are not designed to prevent terrorism. Terrorism in Japan has been traditionally conducted by groups that are exempt from the fingerpritning process.

      This is being done specifically to track foreigners, especially the foreigners who live here. Some of it is being done to prevent illegal immigration.

      Personally, living here, it impacts me as I have to travel a lot throught the Asia Pacific region, and now immigration is going to be a royal pain. I stopped going through the US because my Japanese wife needs to get fingerprinted and photographed there, but unfortunately, leaving Japan right now is not an option for me.

      Shoganai ne!

    3. Re:Thanks to the US by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      This is being done specifically to track foreigners, especially the foreigners who live here. Some of it is being done to prevent illegal immigration.

      So Japan needs to track foreigners, and one of the best way of doing this is by finger printing? I agree with you to some extent, but only if every employer will play along with the government.

      But I doubt this will ever be the case because even in these United States, a country governed and ruled by laws, it simply does not work all the time.

      For Japan, I'd like you to take a stroll in its [private] car junk yards. The folks at some of these yards do not give a damn about the government and its policies. It is folks like these that will continue to employ illegal immigrants.

      It is even worse at scrap yards. Immigrants are payed under the table to aid the process of ridding japan of unwanted waste of the industrial age.

    4. Re:Thanks to the US by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am strongly against this process.

      Japan used to fingerprint all foreigners when they had to get their "gaijin cards". This was fought and overturned in 1999. Now Japan is playing the "terror" card to once again fingerprint foreigners. This is why the foreigners who live here are not exempt.

      A few years back Japan tried to implement a program fingerprinting all of Japan's Citizens. There was a public outcry and the plan was scrapped, but foreigners are foreigners and fair game.

      There are many things I love about Japan, but this is simply a waste of time and money.

      Oh, here is a nice promotional video Japan has kindly put together for us stupid foreign people.

      http://nettv.gov-online.go.jp/common/moviechk.php?p=1203&d=0&t=110&b=0&m=1&r=2

      You can easily see their perception of foreigners as slightly retarded, happy, future criminals by the way we are portrayed in this video.

    5. Re:Thanks to the US by Oswald · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm speechless.

      That video is so insulting and so amateurish that it's hard to believe it ever saw the light of day. The really ironic part is that the Ministry of Justice (see, I watched all the way to the end) could have easily--and for a small amount of money--have gotten an American PR firm to create an infomercial so good that people throughout the western would would have paid to rent it. Because we gaijin really are slightly retarded--and now we know that we're not the only ones.

    6. Re:Thanks to the US by Indefinite,+Ephemera · · Score: 1

      It struck me more as standard contempt of bureaucracies for the public.

      Two points of associated information: (1) I'm a Brit; (2) I haven't seen Japanese governmental videos targeted at the indigenous population for comparison.

    7. Re:Thanks to the US by saiha · · Score: 1

      I could deal with the video up till iI heard "September". I was incredibly disappointed. I can forgive them making fun of foreigners because I know that in America the same thing is often done, if unconsciously (speaking louder does not in fact help forgeiners understand you), but no more than that.

      I admit, I got to the 3 minute mark and just stopped watching.

    8. Re:Thanks to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There, looked it up just for you: Japanese Toilet Training for Kids (English Subtitled)

    9. Re:Thanks to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute. Why did the bla... African-American lady get dubbed over? The guy in the black shirt was barely intelligible, but he came through just fine.

    10. Re:Thanks to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should have had dattebayo do the timing on that video.

    11. Re:Thanks to the US by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      And don't you just love how they dubbed over the black woman's voice with a more "Euro" sounding voice?

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    12. Re:Thanks to the US by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese are not known to waste time and resources on what I'd call useless ventures


      I am an outsider but see the waste by the famous postal system (I think they are Japanese bank, insurer, etc. as well). Wasting money on multi-billion and multi-trillion yen projects like some tunnel to some region that has a very low population anyway.

      Or, see whale killing in the antarctic. Unsustainable and not even making money - only surviving on government subsidies. And their excuse (the Japanese official whaling agency!) is "whales are eating all the fish and depleting fish stocks" which is such baloney and bull shit that I cannot believe it is coming out of a mouth of an intelligent person (eg. 1000 years ago seas had 1000s of time the number of whales and A LOT more other fish too -- how retarded can one be not to see the connection between man and fish stock declines?)

      Fingerprinting is another, but you should be saying that UK is forefront on that. They are doing the same AFAIK. And even started to collect DNA from their own citizens.

      There are many more examples of waste in Japan but I haven't looked for any. Nor do I live there to know.
  18. Your Papers, Please... by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    America has been doing this to citizens of every single country except Canada for many years now. Even up here in Canada we figure it's only a matter of time.

    1. Re:Your Papers, Please... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It's either the fingerprint routine or you get to become the 51st state and pay taxes. I'd stick with the fingerprints.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its cause they like Canadians :) some are more equal than others.

      might put a star of david on my shirt next time I have to go to the states.

    3. Re:Your Papers, Please... by mnbjhguyt · · Score: 1

      the big news last year was that the US added retina scan to fingerprinting to all incoming passengers.

    4. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      Trevor, this is true for first-time visitors to the US, but the similarities end there. (Now I've just finished what has become a very long post, and it's not a criticism of you, but rather a jumping-off point for various problems with Japan's treatment of non-citizens.)

      Japan will now be fingerprinting and questioning all non-Japanese, even residents, each and every time they enter or leave the country. (So even if you hate this new law so much that you'll move back to where you came from, you can't escape the indignity! And there isn't enough time to take out citizenship -- all the checks required necessitate a wait of at least 6 months before a Japanese passport will be yours.) A resident non-citizen in the US would not be fingerprinted repeatedly.

      Consider also that while the entry procedures may be becoming more US-like, once you're safely across the border, in the US your civil liberties are guaranteed to an extent that Japan has never allowed. Particularly in Tokyo, street cops will pull you over and demand that you display your Alien Registration Card on the slightest pretext. In the US, such "papers please" policing is unthinkable -- see the Kolender v. Lawson case of 1983 and, more recently, the Circuit City driver's license fiasco well-covered here on Slashdot.

      So what we're getting is a Japanese system that takes the most totalitarian parts from the new US (invasive entry procedures) and their own traditions (arbitrary stop-and-search plus medieval detention procedures) and combines them together while deflecting criticism with "the US demands it" and "international terrorism". Not so fast, Minister! If you really wanted to mimic the US, the US entry procedures would come into effect and the Alien Registration Card would be abolished!

      These cards contain a frightening amount of personal information -- name, DOB, POB, place of residence abroad, address in Japan, primary householder, emplyoer's name and address, date of landing, date of visa expiry, visa type, and who knows what else. Having to carry this on one's person is an identity-theft disaster waiting to happen, and they're semi-legally deputizing employers, mobile phone providers, and hotels to check these cards as well.

      The US may be treating non-citizens as criminals when they try to enter the country for the first time, but Japan does this always. Even taking out citizenship won't stop the street cop looking to impress passers-by with how tough he is on foreign crime -- he'll still pull you over and you'll have to explain that you're Japanese before he lets you go.

      Blaming the United States is just what the Japanese government wants you to do. Meanwhile, their violation of the civil liberties of resident aliens coninues well past the immigration gates all the way to your neighborhood street corner.

    5. Re:Your Papers, Please... by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      It's either the fingerprint routine or you get to become the 51st state and pay taxes. I'd stick with the fingerprints. We already pay taxes. And if our government doesn't stop trying to "harmonize" our international commerce laws and keeps making noise about privatizing everything we'll be the 51st state in all but name pretty soon. And we'll have the fingerprint thing.
    6. Re:Your Papers, Please... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Well, my company wanted me to goto Japan but i kept refusing... now i have a legitimate reason.
      I will invoke 5th Amendment.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    7. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, everyone knows Canadians would never do any of that terrorist business, eh? Between the pot, sex, rum-like beer, and snow they've got no reason to hate anyone - except when someone beats them in Hockey - then you gotta be on your right guard.

      And where's Chretien eh? He was funny - fulfilled the job description - this Stephan Harper fella keeps trying to be a President. The jobs called Prime Minister Stephan, you gotta remember your job is next to Prime Rib in the dictionary. Start acting more like a rib on a podium and less like a neo-conservative, expansionist, militaristic prick - ya hoser!

    8. Re:Your Papers, Please... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe our neighbours to the south should consider the alternative. We could use 50 new provinces.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been in the US several times as simple visitor and they took my fingerprints
      and retina scan every time, asking the same questions all the time, so
      I don't think it is only for first-time visitors.

    10. Re:Your Papers, Please... by BJH · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, but I'd also like to point out one thing.

      If you really are leaving Japan permanently, then note that the penalty for not providing your fingerprints is deportation.

      So, on your way out refuse to give your fingerprints and let them kick you out of the country.

    11. Re:Your Papers, Please... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No we couldn't. You don't really want a bunch of Americans voting for the ultraconservative Canadian Democratic Party, do you?

      I'm all in favour of the Turks and Caicos joining up though. Welcome guys!

    12. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the inhabitant of a liberal border state, I welcome my new Canadian overlords.

      If Canada didn't seem to have an unhealthy fixation on the British monarchy I wouldn't even blink, really. We have a lot more in common with Canadians than we do Middle Americans around here, and the sun is setting upon the U.S. I'm not sure what would be in it for Canada, though. My charming company?

    13. Re:Your Papers, Please... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      You have a point. Although I'm sure they could get used to the idea of having more than two parties to vote for, I'm fairly confident, given their history, that they'd vote for the "wrong" party no matter how many choices you gave them.

      Oh, and ditto on Turks and Caicos. Come February, I could use a swim in warm tropical Canadian waters.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:Your Papers, Please... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      If Canada didn't seem to have an unhealthy fixation on the British monarchy I wouldn't even blink, really.

      Other than the Queen's face being on some of the money, and the frequent use of the word "Royal" (Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Canadian Air Force, etc) the monarchy doesn't play a huge role. It's more tradition than function. I suspect it's the same way in any Commonwealth country.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:Your Papers, Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we could use the SI system and a dollar that was worth something!

      Let's do lunch...

  19. Balance of Power by mcelrath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Each new power given to the government must be balanced by a power of the citizenry. Else, this is just another step on the path to a facist state.

    These new powers of surveillance and databases that we're giving our governments are vast. Never before in history has a country been able to monitor the movements and transactions of everyone, with so much precision. I know of no balancing power that has been given to the citizens in countries such as the US, UK, and now Japan, to check that the government is not abusing these powers. And the citizenry certainly does not have the equivalent power of knowing the private travel habits of their officials.

    The fact of the matter is that these kinds of powers are far more useful for tracking law-abiding citizens than catching criminals. You don't catch criminals by identifying all the non-criminals. The database of non-criminals is totally useless, since any truly nefarious characters will avoid it, and not end up in your database at all. These kinds of things are often justified on the basis of preventing petty crime. But, this is far too large a power to give the government to reduce petty crime. Petty crime will never hit zero.

    Instead, these new kinds of powers have far more use in tracking political enemies and corporate espionage. For instance just before the next G8 summit you can bet there will be new names on the no-fly lists. Before a major political debate, the challenging candidate will be denied travel. Governments will be able to determine when competing corporations are traveling for a meeting, and deny entry to those people. For people who are not political dissidents or corporate higher-ups, the only possible consequence besides deterioration of our democratic systems is that we will end up being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and be accused of committing a crime. The dragnet will have found us. And the evidence will be ironclad. Because, fingerprints are never wrong, are they?

    I need a succinct way to explain these issues. The fact of the matter these arguments always come down to the brain-dead simple arguments that are difficult to refute: a) This will help catch <latest bogeyman>; and b) I'm not a <latest bogeyman> so why should I care? I need a one-sentence refutation to these arguments to give the people that don't think very hard about it. Obviously those interested in preserving freedom such as myself are not winning this argument. Anyone want to suggest one in the comments?

    --Bob

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    1. Re:Balance of Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need a succinct way to explain these issues. The fact of the matter these arguments always come down to the brain-dead simple arguments that are difficult to refute: a) This will help catch ; and b) I'm not a so why should I care? I need a one-sentence refutation to these arguments to give the people that don't think very hard about it. Obviously those interested in preserving freedom such as myself are not winning this argument. Anyone want to suggest one in the comments?

      How about, "If they have no reason to suspect me, why should they search/track/fingerprint/whatever me?

    2. Re:Balance of Power by ChronosWS · · Score: 0, Troll

      a) Prove it.
      b) You aren't the latest bogeyman yet. When you are, why should *I* care?

      Ultimately, people swayed by the arguments you presented do not possess the critical thinking ability to understand the situation, let alone understand any counter arguments you present. Your best bet is to simply make them afraid of whatever you need to in order to move on with your life. If you can't elevate them to your level, then put them to use at the level of which they have shown themselves capable, low though it may be. There is no particular need for your life to be crap just because the people around you enjoy crappiness.

    3. Re:Balance of Power by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      The only one I've ever had partial success with in the UK is "that means they'll have your children's fingerprints (and DNA in those cases) in the police database for life, alongside the real criminals". Even that doesn't succeed very often. Most people really don't value their personal information or privacy; they know they're innocent, so why should an innocent person ever fear their own government? No matter how many examples of corrupt officials using cctv cameras to look down dresses, or look into the financial affairs of their neighbours, or check on their partner to see if they're cheating, they fundamentally trust 'the system' to only affect the 'bad men'. They know politicians and companies are weaselly to each other; they expect them to pull dirty tricks on their opponents. They don't even see it as bad behaviour any more.

      Those that do care are just ignored by the politicians, because we don't have enough of a voice (i.e. money) to matter.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    4. Re:Balance of Power by n+dot+l · · Score: 1
      When talking to Americans, I generally exploit the fact that their political parties have been attacking each other in the most ridiculously stupid, malicious, partisan ways for years. It's pretty sad, but the name calling and scaremongering are not only expected but pretty much a part of American culture (kind of depressing seeing them there, juxtaposed with the dying values of the previous generation).

      I'm not a <latest bogeyman> so why should I care? If this person's a Republican, I say "Yes, but what happens if Hillary is elected and gets access to that database?". If it's a Democrat, I say "But would you trust George Bush or Dick Cheney with that database? How about Rudy and his favorite police chief (or whatever that guy he suggested for DHS director was)?"

      As for the people that don't fit into either camp I've found that they're either libertarians (in which case they already know the answer but were just trying to prove a point), are displeased with both parties (in which case either answer will do), or are intelligent enough that I don't have to stoop to the level of the extreme left/right media to prove my point anyway.

      However, I am Canadian, and my exposure to Americans is thus limited to people I converse with on the internet and those I meet while travelling so, naturally, YMMV.

      As for what I tell my fellow Canadians, well, none has actually said that to me yet. I imagine I'd point out that the information would almost certainly be shared with (and here I am, fearmongering again, because the average attention span is so goddamn short) the US government.
    5. Re:Balance of Power by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      If they have no reason to suspect me, why should they search/track/fingerprint/whatever me? I really, really, really wish that this answer would work. Sadly, it's based around right and wrong and that's way too abstract for the idiots that actually try to give this argument in the first place.

      Like I said in my reply to the parent, the only way I've found to get through to these people is to remind them that the the corporation or political party that the person asking most hates and fears might get access to the data, and that it's easy to make a stamp that can leave someone else's fingerprints - all you need's a picture of said fingerprint and a 3D printer, all of which will now exist.

      And every time I go through this I die a little, because saying that it's wrong to invade people's privacy like this should be enough. People depress me so much...
    6. Re:Balance of Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Control and conformity is certainly beneficial to those in the business of government, but if you really want to know why every year we are subject to more laws than the year before, just follow the money. How many millions (or billions) of tax dollars will it cost to implement this program? How much of that will go straight to administration? How much precedent will this set for future expansions of power and revenue?

      As always, follow the money. How many trillions of dollars does a government need to spend per year before we start to realize that maybe, just maybe, those trillions of dollars aren't the means, but rather the objective?

    7. Re:Balance of Power by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      a) This will help catch ; and b) I'm not a so why should I care?

      These sorts of powers have always been abused in the past. (bring up concrete examples if necessary; J. Edgar's FBI is a good place to start) What's to keep them from being abused in the future, the impeccable honesty of modern politicians like Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani?

      If you really need to chop it down to one sentence, I'd go with that last one.

      Of course, it just blows my mind that those are our front-runners. There's got to be like ten people left with land-line phones, five of whom still haven't figured out this "cellular" thing and five of whom just like being eligible to screw with election pollsters.

    8. Re:Balance of Power by visionsofmcskill · · Score: 1

      One sentance reply : "First they came for the jews, and i did not speak out, for i was not a jew."

      If that doesnt stop them in their tracks you have a lot of deconstructing to do before you can really address the core issues. The problem here is that people are not afraid of their government anymore, this US was founded on the idea that the government is NOT to be trusted... its a strange concept to most peolpe, but it works in that fundementally it requires the "people" and the "government" to watch over each other... not a one way street as it is increasingly becoming.

      When germany made the transition from being a government of the people to being a government that controls the people... the jews and various "others" began to dissapear.

      How much do we have to give up to our governing powers before people start to dissapear?

      "then they came for the -teachers-, and i did not mind, for i was not a -teacher-"

      "Then they came for me, but there was no one left to speak out for me"

      --
      --Idiots, Every single one of YOU, A flaming mass of conglomerated morons, hey wait a second, isnt that how RAID works?
  20. Perfect timing by UfoZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...for all of us gaijins going home for the holidays! Needless to say, I'm not pleased.

    Bonus points for this idiot minister using a bullshit "a friend of a friend is in Al Quaeda, therefore all foreigners are dangerous" claim to justify this crap.

    1. Re:Perfect timing by dancingmad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod parent up. This unabashedly stupid story about a friend of a friend in al Qaeda has been used to push this useless legislation through. It's sickening and the scare tactics used are as bad as America's. I hate Japanese politics but the al Qaeda story is a new level of stupidity to me. There were some people questioning it, but it got the job done.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:Perfect timing by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for this idiot minister using a bullshit "a friend of a friend is in Al Quaeda, therefore all foreigners are dangerous" claim to justify this crap.

            America did it first.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Perfect timing by nmoog · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this measure really has very little to do with terrorism, buuuut... haven't most of Japan's recent(ish) terrorist attacks been instigated by citizens - Like the saran gas guys?

    4. Re:Perfect timing by UfoZ · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the point - but even for regular non-terrorist stuff, the overwhelming majority of criminals in Japan are, surprise, surprise, Japanese nationals. Foreign crime just gets more attention for some reason (easier to blame, I guess...?)

    5. Re:Perfect timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what country has a minister that openly admits to belong to a network that has terrorists in it.

      Shouldn't they
      1. Arrest the minister. Torture him until he gives up the name of his friend
      2. Arrest his friend. Torture him until he gives up the name of this terrorist that knew about attacks before they happened
      3. Throw all three in a deep hole and forget about them.

      Seems to me like we have 2 Japanese at potentially high level in government circles that mingles with terrorist without taking action. Thats the real criminals. Those that know about things, but don't react.

  21. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    having your fingerprints taken is being treated like a criminal? Sounds like your lily white fat ass has never spent a day in jail.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  22. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 INFORMATIVE

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's definitely not flamebait.

  23. I have better idea by partowel · · Score: 0

    Fingerprints? Rubbish.

    I want 3 samples of DNA [ blood, saliva, hair ] and retina images of both your eyes.

    We have to keep people safe *cough* yeah right *cough*

    AFTER those "safe" tests, we get your full palm prints, both hands.

    Then we collect a full infrared body heat signature [ front, back, both sides, top, bottom ].

    Then we collect your voice signature [ talk into this microphone please ].

    Then we collect a 3D image of your body with this laser scanner [ take off ALL your clothes ].

    Then we keep all this information forever and ever.

    If you pass all these tests, you will be allowed in.

    We will keep you safe.

    On the other hand :

    For sale : information you can't get anywhere else. 100 million per person. Cash only.

    Future tests in the works :

    quantum dna scanner, Neutron body scanner, Energy Karma signature scanner, etc.

    1. Re:I have better idea by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I want 3 samples of DNA [ blood, saliva, hair ] and retina images of both your eyes. Been reading Stephen Baxter have we? Don't worry, it's coming. Along with the 3 hour phone call to the airline to justify why you need to fly.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  24. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Frankly this sounds like a good idea to me. I really don't have a problem with it. Someone please explain why I should.

    Because being able to freely move about with out molestation is an essential freedom, which has been violated throughout the ages. It's time to say, No more! That's why. If you wish to give up your freedom, that's okay. But don't take away mine, please.

    --
    What?
  25. They aren't doing enough. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No. This is not enough. I think they should do more.

    They should:

    • Take fingerprints, handprints, and footprints.
    • Take retinal scans.
    • Take two samples of DNA:
      • A drop of blood.
      • A hair follicle. If the person is bald or otherwise doesn't have suitable hair follicles, they will have to pay a fee.
    • Take a voice print.
    • Take photographs of the face from eighteen different angles.

    In addition to all of this, all travelers should have to submit notarized copies of their birth certificate as well as copies of every page of their passport in order for officials to know everywhere they have traveled. Also, they would have to submit a special letter from the government of their country of citizenship that states that the person does not have any criminal records in that country. Also, they would be subject to an interview using a lie detector machine. All of this information would be kept indefinitely and shared with foreign governments. Also it would be sold for pennies to telemarketing companies and spammers so that they could target you for the products that you are most likely to buy.

    No, they aren't going to do all that, but that's what I think they should do.

    1. Re:They aren't doing enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really, REALLY hope you're joking...

  26. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    Ohh, the melodrama, playing the race card too.

    There are varying degrees of being treated like a criminal.

  27. Tourist Attraction by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    The new system is being introduced as Japan campaigns to attract more tourists.

    Oh yeah, that'll work. "Over to your right, you can see and experience our meddlesome bureaucracy at work. Just follow the rubber yellow line to be stamped and printed."

    --
    What?
  28. The terrorist of the future... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... will look like 12-year-old Japanese schoolgirls since the authorities will be too busy checking out their panties to suspect them.

    1. Re:The terrorist of the future... by Riquez · · Score: 1

      when you said "authorities" did you mean "tentacles"?

      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  29. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    How would this negatively affect me?

          The extra minute or so per passenger adds up, when you're waiting in line.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  30. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True. And you should open your doors to police searches without notification or justification whenever they want, because if you have nothing to hide, why do you care? The only people who should exercise their liberties are those who have things to hide. That way we can outlaw all liberties as merely tools of criminals. Good thinking, sport.

  31. Japan Cavity Search! by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

    You do not want to get cavity searched in Japan!!!!

    http://mdn.mainichi.jp/culture/waiwai/news/20071115p2g00m0dm016000c.html

  32. Never mind then. by saihung · · Score: 1

    Japan seems to have an obsession with foreigners as criminals. This despite (what I've heard) a rather obvious all-Japanese organized criminal underworld. Apparently, it's still possible in Japan to see business establishments that blatantly refuse to cater to foreigners. Sod 'em. I don't want to go badly enough that I'd subject myself to that mess.

  33. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by A+Pancake · · Score: 1

    I don't know where you are from, but around here you don't get printed unless you're being charged with a crime. I'd say that that qualifies. I also didn't know being in jail was something to be proud of.

  34. Call me anal..... by blankoboy · · Score: 1
    but how often and how will they be cleaning these biometric devices? I'm sure many folks don't relish the thought of touching a device that every incoming and outgoing foreigner has touched. I imagine though that this is not high on their list of concerns.

    It will be interesting to see what impact this new system has on business and tourist travel. I will be all smiles if it has a drastic impact and Japan relents.

    1. Re:Call me anal..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are anything like the devices the US customs uses, they will be very dirty and cleaned once about never. Sometimes, they also make you dab your fingers in wax to make the prints more readable. The thing was covered in that slimy shit last time I came into the US.

  35. I suggest by renegadesx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If it's hot asian women you are after, Singapore (though I personally think Japanese chicks are worth the fingerprinting bs)

    If you want a geeky holiday, South Korea, best video game tournaments in the world.

    Malaysa is not bad a place either

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  36. Explanation of consequences? by cralewyth · · Score: 1

    So if I'm heading to Japan for a two-week educational visit at the start of 2009, What does this mean for me? (Apart from the obvious, my fingerprint being taken)

    --
    "Women are just like ninjas; They lie even when it is more convenient to tell the truth." ~ Unknown
  37. How do I erase my fingerprints? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the simplest, safest, and least painful way to get rid of fingerprints permanently?
    Would be the greatest FU to these countries.

  38. SO um.... by etrnlcoca · · Score: 1

    So um... What's the big deal? It's like having your passport checked at the airport... What, you don't think they keep a record of you? Nothing new, Some gas stations in the U.S. scan your index finger to keep a tab instead of using cash or credit. Is it a bigger issue of 666, the fear of some one else being in more control of your life than you? I am more ticked about the Social Secuirty tax in the U.S. more than this finger printing in Japan. Don't worry about it, every country will have something like this sooner or later. Not worth loosing sleep over it! Enjoy Japan!!! It is a beautiful place, honestly I haven't been there... but I've seen pictures :-) Knowing that they want my finger print wouldn't,shouldn't, and doesn't disscourage me from wanting to go there! It might even give some people a sence of security. Not me, but other people might...

  39. Who hasn't been fingerprinted? by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

    I've never been in jail (except for a tour) yet have had my fingerprints taken 5 times. First was at 16 when I got a job with a city. Second through fifth were for volunteering in a school, student teaching, and two teaching jobs. Being a huge supporter of privacy, I don't give a hoot. As another poster said, they can lift your prints from something you just touched. Let the Japanese government have its mostly useless and highly masturbatorial wad of security theater. They video tape you from a vast number of security cameras, which I find to be far more invasive. Your credit card number comes up wherever you use the ATM or purchase something. Hotels must see your passport to let you stay.

  40. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    After a long flight trip the last thing I want is to be fingerprinted. This is why I refuse to travel to America anymore. I am more willing to fly to Japan though as the flight isn't as long and so I'm not as tired.

  41. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by djupedal · · Score: 1

    "Frankly this sounds like a good idea to me. I really don't have a problem with it. Someone please explain why I should. How would this negatively affect me?"

    In the past, it wasn't uncommon to see 'foreign' travellers sitting on the floor in Narita, waiting to be processed into the country. They might be from Korea or Vietnam or even China - but the look on their faces as they sat on the linoleum (no chairs, sorry) inside a temp. holding area, marked by orange traffic cones, said that you didn't want to be one of them. The Japanese are pretty good at making outsiders feel uncomfortable when they want to.

    If they were lucky, it only took a day or two to complete the process before they were released...some allowed to enter and some put on the next aircraft out.

    Now, EVERY non-Japanese will be fingerprinted, photographed, turned into a number and forced to wait a minimum of 30 minutes more than whatever the process took before. Each and every time you come into Japan. Even if you hold a residency permit. I suspect the process will take a bit longer each time you come through.

  42. Lets not forget by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    That the last real terrorist threat to Japan's mainland was homegrown.

  43. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People that wear it like a badge of honour do so as it gives them an excuse to bitch an moan about "being held back by the man" and "there picking on me because im black" like their the big victim because they did something wrong

    Those that claim "racism" more often than not are usually the racist ones themselves.

    Anyways, fingerprinting is something you do when you get a criminal record, and basically here you DO have a criminal record for nothing more than visiting a certain country. How the fuck is that fair? Enlighten me somebody?

  44. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I don't know where you are from, but around here you don't get printed unless you're being charged with a crime.

    Here in the US DWB is enough of a crime to justify getting printed ...on your way to jail!

  45. Gov't Video/Poster on this + an online petition by MochaMan · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm a foreign resident of Japan, and this policy is invasive enough that after years here as a tax-paying resident with a Japanese spouse and child, we are thinking of packing our things and moving back to Canada.

    First off, I'd encourage everyone who opposes this policy to register their views with this online petition.

    I would also encourage you to write a letter to the Ministry of Justice at:

    General Affairs Division, Immigration Bureau, Ministry of Justice

    1-1-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku,
    Tokyo, 100-8977, Japan
    Tel: +81 (0)3-3580-4111
    URL: http://www.moj.go.jp/


    Also, send a copy to the Japanese National Tourist Organization, making clear the impact on tourism, at their Japanese headquarters and your regional office listed at the URL below:

    Japan National Tourist Organization
    10th Floor, Tokyo Kotsu Kaikan Building, 2-10-1 Yurakucho,
    Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0006, Japan
    Tel: +81 (0)3-3201-3331
    URL: http://www.jnto.go.jp/eng/contact/regional_offices.html


    Not only is this policy an invasion of privacy, but also discriminatory in its application. Of the major terrorist incidents in Japan, none has been committed by a foreigner -- 1995 Tokyo Sarin Gas attacks, bombing of government office buildings in Hokkaido in the 70s, assassination of the Mayor of Nagasaki... all perpetrated by Japanese nationals.

    Further, fingerprinting is dubious at best in preventing terrorist attacks. A terrorist organization capable of a serious attack on Japan is capable of entering the country without passing through immigration. From the point of view of politics, however, fingerprinting foreigners is an easy way to make it appear as though you're getting tough on terrorism and foreign crime.

    Lastly, The Japanese government has produced an introductory video on the new scheme that you really have to see to believe. As the guy in the video says "I'll pass it on to all my friends". I get the feeling this won't have the effect the Japanese government intends it to have.

    They've also put out a PDF version of the poster for this program.
    1. Re:Gov't Video/Poster on this + an online petition by blankoboy · · Score: 1
      I am with you on this as I don't plan to make any trips out of Japan while this program is ongoing. I hope you realize that if you plan to leave Japan after this beings you will still be forced to submit to the biometric check. This is why I don't plan to leave/enter Japan during this time (yes, I'm currently in Japan so I may be here for a while!). I wonder how long it will be before they start forcing foreigners within Japan to submit to this as well.

      Another thing to ponder is Japan's shoddy record of keeping such sensitive data secure. In the past a lot of Police records have been shared via P2P clients (Winny) on PC's of horny porn surfing officers (real professionals!). Just imagine your biometric data getting dumped onto the net for all to download. The scandal this would start is unthinkable.

      Japan really ought to take a step back and rationalize this. But Japan being what it is (nation of mindless sheep...sorry to say), it won't.

    2. Re:Gov't Video/Poster on this + an online petition by imrehg · · Score: 1

      Lastly, The Japanese government has produced an introductory video on the new scheme that you really have to see to believe. That's a really awful PR video, with fade-in/fade-out list of terrorist attacks since 9-11, of course with the towers (on fire) in the background...

      When they cut to Tokyo, I was really thinking when will a rampaging, terrorizing Godzilla appear??? Oh, yeah, Godzilla is Japanese, so no need for fingerprinting....

      Other than that: were there no terrorists before 2001? Somehow every country just seem to make it harder and harder for people to travel - now that it would be possible for more people than ever in human history....

    3. Re:Gov't Video/Poster on this + an online petition by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 0

      what is with all these Canadian / Japanese dual residencies?

      sounds fishy to me... better start the strip searching as well...

  46. Disney Finger Prints Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took my 6 yo to Disney Florida and we both had to give a finger print to get in.

  47. What goes around comes around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This was started by Americans fingerprinting foreigners. I was on a plane FROM Japan when the fingerprinting rules kicked in in the US a few years back. I watched how the big bad customs agents yelled and screamed at the little japanese grandmothers to wipe their foreheads to get enough grease for a good fingerprinting. When the agents realized that the grandmothers didn't speak english they simply yelled louder and louder, scaring the grandmothers more and more.

    What goes around comes around.

  48. It's a slippery-slope by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    The point is that they get you used to giving up liberties a bit at a time.

    They'll start out small with fingerprints, next thing you know it'll be holographic head scans and "safety cameras" on every street corner.

    --
    No sig today...
  49. Discrimination in a Different Sense by reporter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Fingerprinting foreigners does not violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights if all foreigners are treated equally. Before addressing the issue of "equally", I note that a foreigner is not entitled to the same privileges that a citizen enjoys. For example, a government can legally and ethically target non-citizens for random searches prior to boarding an aircraft. An Iranian citizen residing in the USA is not entitled to the same privileges that an American citizen of Iranian ancestry is entitled.

    As for the issue of "equally", the new Japanese law mandating the fingerprinting of foreigners is discriminatory and is unacceptable. In particular, the law exempts Korean citizens who reside permanently in Japan but who refuse Japanese citizenship. Roughly 45% of these "refuseniks" pledge their allegiance to North Korea. They send their children to special schools which teach their students to sing the praises of North Korea.

    These Korean refuseniks deliberately refuse Japanese citizenship because they want to maintain their "Korean-ness". They believe that blood determines both culture and nation of loyalty. They are loyal to either North Korea or South Korea.

    The Korean refuseniks have harbored this intense racist bigotry for decades. Since the early 1990s, this bigotry began to fade slightly, and the number of Koreans applying for Japanese citizenship has increased from 5000 annually to 10,000 annually.

    In today's Japan, there is no discrimination against Japanese citizens of Korean ancestry. There is, however, justifiable discrimination against Korean citizens or any other person who lacks Japanese citizenship: for example, a Brazilian citizen of Japanese ancestry does not have the same privileges that a Japanese citizen enjoys.

    The Korean refuseniks are exempted from the fingerprinting requirement because, in the 1980s, the Korean government demanded that the Japanese government end the fingerprinting of Korean citizens who refuse Japanese citizenship. The Korean government insisted that Tokyo fulfill this demand before the Korean government was willing to improve relations with Japan. As a result of this interference by the Korean government in Japanese domestic politics, Tokyo ended the fingerprinting of Korean refuseniks. The Korean refuseniks are also exempted from the fingerprinting in the new Japanese law just passed by the Japanese parliament.

    There is a huge difference between Korean refuseniks and Americans of African ancestry. Some Korean refuseniks are descended from people who were forcibly brought to Japan during World War II. However, many Korean refuseniks are descended from people who voluntarily came to Japan during and after World War II. By contrast, nearly all Americans of African ancestry are descended from people who were forcibly brought to the United States. Yet, while the Korean refuseniks voluntarily refuse Japanese citizenship (that they could easily get), all Americans of African ancestry gladly want to be American citizens.

    The attitude of the Koreans is utterly racist and bigotted. By contrast, most Taiwanese citizens who chose to reside permanently in Japan have conscientiously wanted (and obtained) Japanese citizenship.

    In summary, the new Japanese law mandating the fingerprinting of foreigners is discriminatory and is unacceptable because the law exempts Korean refuseniks. Tokyo should ignore the Korean government and should resume fingerprinting Korean refuseniks -- especially Korean refuseniks who pledge their allegiance to North Korea. (The Korean government has been a far bigger pain to Japan than the Mexican government has been to the USA.)

    1. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by noone06 · · Score: 1

      Fingerprinting foreigners does not violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights [un.org] if all foreigners are treated equally. In summary, the new Japanese law mandating the fingerprinting of foreigners is discriminatory and is unacceptable because the law exempts Korean refuseniks. FYI the American policy exempts Canadians from fingerprinting..

    2. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      "The attitude of the Koreans is utterly racist and bigotted."

      That is complete and utter bullshit.

      Korean's love Japanese TV and movies. All the students watch anime.
      Most Koreans do not like to travel very much, but they all have either been to Japan, or plan on going there sometime soon.
      Many of my students wear Japan's soccer team uniforms in the class. some wear t-shirts with a japanese flag under their school uniform.

      I would have to say that you are the one who is racist and bigotted.

      I dont understand why Japan feels the need to do this. Are 'crimes by forigners' a serious national concern?

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    3. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by novakyu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before you label these "refuseniks" and potentially all Koreans as "racist bigots", perhaps you should look into the modern history of Japanese occupation of Korean penninsula. There are many controversial historical issues, but I will point you to the worst alleged war crime by Japan against Koreans (and I mean alleged in the neutral sense—like O.J. Simpson is an alleged murderer). You can look up the rest, if you are interested. But, in short, I think it'd not be an exaggeration to say that compared to the Korean people under Japanese rule during WWII, the American citizens of Japanese ancestry lived like kings and queens in their "concentration camp" during the same time.

      The point is, these people have not prejudged the Japanese—there is history that just can't be buried by nothing less than the amnesia induced by several centuries and all the good feeling that'll be generated by a unified world government (either that, or a very simple apology from the current Japanese government). Calling these people, who, from either their own (my friend's grandfather (who is a Korean) lived under the Japanese rule and could describe all the forced assimilation of Koreans into Japanese culture) or experience of people they trust (like family and teachers), know how badly Koreans were treated by the Japanese, "racist bigots" ... is either a display of patent ignorance of modern history, or some truly amazing bigotry in its own right.

      Well, I am not a Korean myself (I just have a friend who is overflowing with "Korean-ness", and who, despite all that, happens to be a best friend), so if you need more, you will have to find another Korean to discuss it in more detail. But I just want you to know; it's not like these people don't have a very good reason to distrust and even hate the Japanese. They have the best reason you can find in the world to hate a group of people.

      P.S. One very obvious argument (the same one I made when I was first confronted with this) would be: "But that's all history, over 60, 70 years ago!". And here's my friend's answer:

      "And the Japanese people living in Japan TODAY is still proud that they beat the Russians, threatened the Chinese, and oppressed the Koreans. Unlike what used to be the Nazi Germany, where there can't possibly be another NAZI party TODAY, and calling a German "Nazi" would be the gravest insult you could throw at him, in Japan, the same emperor (well, emperor of the same line) that ruled over Japan during the periods of WWII (and before) still rules over the APPARENTLY SAME JAPAN. The Japanese government continually refuses to acknowledge its war crimes against Koreans (especially the Korean women who were sexually abused, not to mention the men who were used as human shields) nor apologize for it. It's not history, not just yet. It's very much current, despite the length of time that passed."

    4. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      "By contrast, most Taiwanese citizens who chose to reside permanently in Japan have conscientiously wanted (and obtained) Japanese citizenship."

      Given recent events, the Taiwanese have *quite* the reason to take up Japanese citizenship- being more widely recognized diplomatically is a start.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    5. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 1

      But I just want you to know; it's not like these people don't have a very good reason to distrust and even hate the Japanese. They have the best reason you can find in the world to hate a group of people. That's all well and good. But they want to live in the country of the people they hate, and seem to have no problem surrounding themselves with their oppressors? It doesn't seem like rocket science to figure out this logic:

      If you don't want to be a Japanese citizen, don't live in Japan.
      If you hate the Japanese and want to separate yourself from them, don't live in Japan.
      If you're bursting with Koreanness, well -- there are actually two Korean countries to choose from!

      The truth is, they may have good reasons to be upset with the historical actions of the Japanese, but that seems to have no bearing on what citizenship they have. It sounds to me like these people want special treatment for no good reason. Get off your high horse; if you want to be a Korean, then you can be one, either as an alien resident with no special treatment, or as a resident of Korea. Otherwise, welcome to the world everyone else lives in, too.
      --
      -----[0_o]-----
      We are not amused.
    6. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Right, Japan did evil things to Koreans. That's not in dispute. But does it really justify prejudice? The Koreans themselves have a pretty poor record for treating Koreans well; look at the entire northern half of their country for an example of Koreans doing things to Koreans that even the Japanese never thought of. In fact, on a purely statistical level, any Korean alive today who has been tortured or abused by a government is more likely to have been tortured or abused by a Korean government than a Japanese government!

      Japan has blood on its hands, and it is a continuing disgrace that it insists on trying to cover up its past crimes and whitewash history. But that does not justify pretending that the Japanese are uniquely evil or have done uniquely bad things to Koreans. It does not justify whitewashing the sins of Korean governments. It does not even justify prejudice against Japan.

      Oh, and as for your sadly misinformed friend, who believes that

      the Japanese people living in Japan TODAY is still proud that they beat the Russians, threatened the Chinese, and oppressed the Koreans. Unlike what used to be the Nazi Germany, where there can't possibly be another NAZI party TODAY, and calling a German "Nazi" would be the gravest insult you could throw at him
      ...well, sorry, but wrong on both counts. There are plenty of Japanese who are not proud of their WW2 history, and there are plenty of neo-Nazis in Germany. (Interesting anecdotes: I met a German man just a few weeks ago who insisted that Hitler had been gravely misunderstood, that the Nazi party had done more good than harm, and that the reason there aren't many Jews in Poland these days is that there weren't many there to start with, and a Japanese woman a few months ago who apologised profusely on behalf of her country for the crimes it committed against my country's soldiers during the war.)
    7. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You left out the rape of Nanking and the the treatment of US and UK prisoners of war and US and UK none combatant prisoners. The

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Discrimination in a Different Sense by novakyu · · Score: 1

      ... and that the reason there aren't many Jews in Poland these days is that there weren't many there to start with ...

      This is actually an interesting point, considering the continuing (and perhaps even rising) anti-semitism in Europe and even U.S. I was in Krakow just this summer for a month, and one of those weeks was some "Annual Jewish Cultural Festival" (I'm not getting the name right, but it's one of the largest in the world---and it's been held in Krakow for over 10, 15 years). My boss, who is, by heritage, Jewish (I don't think he's a practicing Jew ... but that's not the distinction usually made by anti-semites), was there for that week, partly on a separate business and partly to participate in the festival (concerts in the evening, some art classes in the afternoon), had some interesting things to say about history of Jewish persecution in Poland.

      As he tells me, there were some strong oppositions when this festival got started in Krakow, Poland, initially (more than a decade ago), because before, Jews were persecuted and oppressed in Poland. The truth is, the anti-semitism (and persecution) didn't end with Nazi Germany. For decades after WWII, Jews were not treated well, and as result, any Jews who were in Poland after WWII left the country then, and by the time they started this festival, ironically enough, there were no Jews permanently residing in Krakow (plenty would visit to participate, eventually, of course). So, your neo-Nazi acquaintance does have a point---it wasn't just Germans who were racist.

      But, just to be clear, I don't mean to accuse the Poles of rabid racism or anything of the sort. I can honestly say I was thoroughly impressed with their culture, the old city (at least Krakow), and the food in the month's stay there.

      P.S. As far as how the postwar conduct of Germans and Japanese compare against each other, I'm sure anyone can find anecdotal evidences to support nearly any point of view, including my friend's, yours, or mine (which I'm not telling since it's not relevant). But, in any case, here's yet a couple more rhetorical question: Do you think there's any realistic chance of these neo-Nazis gaining a significant political power, much less the majority party, in Germany? Now, I realize the emperor is for the most part, only a figurehead like the royalty of Britain, but who is the father of current Japanese emperor, and is there any chance that the Japanese would reject this imperial system because of the actions endorsed by this line of emperors in the past?

  50. Slight correction by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Previously, you could go through at the Japanese citizen's counter on any status of residence provided your residence was in Japan and you had your foreigner registration card with you (i.e. not your first trip through, but presumably all your subsequent trips through unless your residency lapsed). I've done it on, let's see, International Relations (kokusai gyoumu, what the heck was that called again?), Engineer, and Cultural Activities visas before.

    Ahh well. At worst, this is a minor nuisance which we'll be incurring a few times a year. The Japanese government already has given the both of us the nth degree, what is fingerprints added to that? And it will probably be as perfunctory as the "inspection" I am given at customs every time. (Full transcript of my most recent inspection: "Where is your company?" "Nagoya" "Have a nice day.")

    1. Re:Slight correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... no.

      You miss the whole point. This information is to be shared with what appears to be all interested Foreign and Local parties. That is, other governments and police. And matched against what other governments provide into this pool of information. Do you really trust that it will not be misused? Really?

      My company is in Tokyo (mine, I own it). What about my customers coming to Japan? "Do you know what they did to me at the Airport!!!!????" is not a good way to start a business meeting, let me tell you... that is if they decide to submit to being branded a criminal and get here at all.

  51. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by gullevek · · Score: 1

    Although I hate to fingerprinted and the whole I idea is just dumbfuck stupid (except that they want to weed out the "people" who come in/out with a tourist visa) the machine they use, and they way they do it, seems quite efficient.

    Plus there will be extra lines for the visa + re-entry permit holders.

    Still, ... fucking pisses me off.

    --
    "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  52. ...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by toby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Travellers to the US have been fingerprinted for some time - not to mention all the other indignities they endure. Reciprocity is a bitch, isn't it.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      Yeah, especially as this affects all travelers to Japan, not just US Americans.

    2. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the US Military and Government Diplomats are exempt. Just us Foreign Residents and the Tourists need to worry about this.

    3. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You would be almost right if the world consisted only of Japan and US...

      Brazil is implementing reciprocity in the sense that there is a special line for "US citizens" (soon to include Japanese citizens as well) to get fingerprinted.

      But, with the Japenese implementation, this is not reciprocity,... unless you ignore the collateral damage.

      I am a European living in Japan (permanent resident). For work and leisure, I do travel quite frequently to Europe, US, and other Asian countries (i.e., more than 10-15 international trips a year). Now, when travelling to the US, I will get full service both ways, with the "super quad-S oversize-me security check" each time I board a plane to or from the US. This is in spite of the fact that my country fingerprints neither US nor Japanese citizens (although this may come someday).

      There is also another difference between the US and the Japanese implementations in that, in the US one, green card holders are at least not asked to give their fingerprints each time they reenter their country of residency (and thus line up for 45 minutes or more, together with all regular visitors).
      This is significant when one makes short trips (3-4 nights) abroad and thus does not have any checked-in luggage. In my case, when traveliing back from the US, the difference in time can be significant in that it determines whether I can be back home on the same day or must stay overnight in a hotel near the airport.

    4. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reciprocity is a bitch, isn't it.

      Especially when you're the innocent victim who has no control over the situation but for one measly vote between two competing protection rackets who want the exact same thing: money and power.

      There's a reason why every year you are subject to more laws than the year before, and it's not because making government bigger is unprofitable for those in the business of government. No government in the history of organized coercion has ever significantly and permanently reduced its power or revenue through the process of democracy -- do you think this is just a wild coincidence?

      As always, government wins (on both sides), and "the people" lose (on both sides).

    5. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Cederic · · Score: 1


      I've been boycotting visiting the US since they implemented that program. It's even damaged me professionally, and cost me job opportunities (which require occasional travel to the US).

      I now get to boycott visiting Japan too. It's a terrible shame.

      Of course, it's only a few years until DNA samples are required to leave the UK, and at that point I cease international travel. There will be fallout from all this eventually, but sadly it could take a decade or more.

    6. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, it's only a few years until DNA samples are required to leave the UK, and at that point I cease international travel.

      But you'll have to be fingerprinted anyhow if the UK id cards go ahead as planned, even if you never travel abroad. Personally I'm planning to remove my fingerprints (by one of the slow but non-painful methods) or at least degrade them beyond usefulness (seriously).

    7. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't differ, but it is an additional restriction that shrinks the world for those who will not put up with it or forces people to relent. It also gives support to the US policy by giving them a weak argument (which they will use), look Japan takes fingerprints too.

      I've been avoiding the US quite successfully but I will probably have to travel to Japan for work in the near future.

      My country the UK is also heading in this direction so this isn't a complaint at the people of the relevant countries but the politicians who like to do the easy options rather than the wise ones.

      In the UK and US, it seems to be a combination of "something must be done" calls for action even if ineffective and a desperate attempt to control the world. It might be similar in Japan but I don't know the politics well enough to comment inteligently.

    8. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      Well, we all thought Japan was better than that. ;)

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    9. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by pyr3 · · Score: 1

      Who says I'm a US citizen? You do realize that this affects countries other than that US. What an anti-US view of the world to only focus your thoughts on how this affects the US (and therefore how you can rip on them) as opposed to how it affects the world at large.

    10. Re:...and this differs US entry practices HOW? by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of these sorts of comments because they assume similarities of opinion amongst those in the United States. Yes our fucked up corrupt piece of shit government has been doing this to people for years but there's not much we can do about it (as we don't really live in a representative government anymore)
      Why the gloating from those of you from non-US countries? Do you think we like what's going on? Do you think we like the fact that we live in a fucking idiocracy where the governing bodies are made up of psychopaths?!

      I'm sorry to come off as rude but all this "payback's a bitch eh?" happens to strike me in the heart. Please consider that there are some of us who don't consider ourselves nationals of the United States yet who for now live on the soil it claims. Please stop these comments that group those living in the United States together I don't make blanket statements about "The French" "Brits" "Aussies" or anything else unless joking, and this is clearly not a joking matter.

      Again sorry for the vitrol but I don't want to be associated with the insane fascist policies of a government I disown.

      --
      Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  53. Good! by KNicolson · · Score: 0, Troll

    The more of you Slashdot types it keeps out the better. All the more Japanese totty for me, not that I can imagine the average reader picking up any J girls, even though your pasty-white skin from too long in your Mom's basement may be highly prized here.

    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you supposed to be out of a job and on your way home?

      I thought all you dime-a-dozen worthless NOVA faggots were already out of the country. Oh well.

    2. Re:Good! by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      This is the attitude that makes me think this isn't nearly as bad an idea as it seems.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    3. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet you've got a slammin' case of herpes from the Roppongi bar sluts, too, or worse - straight from the US Navy to you!

      But hang on - after visiting your site and seeing your hilarious picture, I'm getting a much clearer picture .. let me see .. english teacher, of course ... salary under 30 man, hence the desperate ads all over your pathetic blog ... lived in Sakura House for over 2 years ... has slept with a total of 1 japanese girl since arriving, morbidly obese, perhaps a secretary at the eikawa .. hm, I guess you're not using up the supply of japanese "totty" quite as fast as you implied!

      pretty good, eh? See, I am a fucking psychic when it comes to typical sad white guys hiding in Japan like you.

    4. Re:Good! by PetrusMagnusII · · Score: 1

      Oh man I love it Ken, right now.

      I also like how these people below are so quick to assume that you're a NOVA teacher, when at the same time getting pissed about the finger print thing.

      I personally wont be leaving this country until I have no intension of ever coming back, I think the fingerprinting of residents should be just as illegal as fingerprinting a traditional Japanese national.

      Do they do it to green card holders in the states too or just tourists?

  54. In the U.S. it's the same by freitasm · · Score: 1

    I have been photographed and fingerprinted for years when arriving in the U.S. or in transit over it. So why the big deal if other countries do the same? Or are the Americans afraid of this?

  55. Why is this a bad thing? by jjh37997 · · Score: 1

    Why is this a bad thing? What horrible, evil thing will the government be able to do if they have my fingerprints in a national database?

    1. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean besides allowing foreign governments to get around local privacy laws?

      You're asking the wrong question. The right question is: What the hell good is this going to do?

    2. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Americans don't read books, do they.

    3. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      America, the entire world, is entering a state of perpetual tyranny because people don't have the mental furniture necessary to understand the difference betwteen freedom and fascism. Freedom is not the ability to work for Wal-Mart, eat food, and go to theme parks. Freedom is the ability to not kow-tow your head on the sidewalk when a coporate/government thug demands your DNA and your unquestioning obedience. It's moving around the world without tracking devices; tyranny needs to know where the troublemakers are, so that they may be neutralized. Freedom requires the ability to write and speak anonymously. Freedom is NOT the ability to speak your mind only in the safety of your bedroom closet, for every byway and gathering place eventually becomes private property, where now-accepted custom is that no human right to speak or gather exists. Freedom to TROUBLE THE POWERFUL without the certainty that one will be noted and dealt with. Freedom is the ability to travel and meet with people without what are in all sanity PRISON GUARDS logging your movements and recording your words, building inescapable fortresses of data with which to destroy you come the need to do so. The wedding of power and business is in fact fascism, and fascism is always, ALWAYS sold by invoking an implacable enemy that we need to defend from at all costs.

      Of course, as Bush and so many others have shown, that enemy always turns out to be the people that are being protected. Recursion of the "reason" given for all fascisms. The tools used to "protect" you from dark scary people are always - always! turned in full force against you. And done correctly, silence grips the mouths of all and no one dares utter the words to describe the reality in which they live, for the consequences are too deadly. The tools necessary to trigger the use of the KBR-built detention camps being built for the last few years are in place. One bomb, and Bush declares emergency powers and the troublemakers get their asses dragged to extrajudicial prisons at the sole mercy of the Unitary Executive. The Constitution teeters, the last few rights about to be declared void by his pocket judges. And the same is true in France, and the UK, and so many other places.

    4. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when has freedom EVER required the right to speech anonymously??? It has only ever been the right to freedom of expression and views, never I have seen it expressed that you have to be able to do it anonymously. Freedom is also the right to travel knowing the people that are transporting you have taken precautions for your safety, including ensuring people that may VIOLATE my freedom of travel with bombs/knivies/guns or simply alcoholic rages are denied the right to do this to me.

      I hate morons that tout the freedom shit without any real world idea of consequences.

    5. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why post as AC shit-for-brains?

      (I support the OP, so I don't have to).

    6. Re:Why is this a bad thing? by RoshanCat · · Score: 1

      Freedom is not the ability to work for Wal-Mart, eat food, and go to theme parks. Freedom is the ability to not kow-tow your head on the sidewalk when a coporate/government thug demands your DNA and your unquestioning obedience


      Freedom is...having your own definition of freedom

  56. Eh, so what, it's Japan by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1

    They permit the death penalty. It's not like I was planning to go there while that situation persisted anyhow.

    Seriously, what the hell do you expect of a country whose legislation permits the same country to selectively violate such a person's right to life towards whom they have state-level responsibility? Can anything that is not enslavement be expected of such a nation? "As for Nihon, we will be the ideal nation-state whenever it best suits us. When it does not, you get boned. Fundamentally."

    Fuck 'em. And fuck the US, China, Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, basically every last damn African country and every other undercivilized shithole in the world.

    1. Re:Eh, so what, it's Japan by Riquez · · Score: 1

      A person from a civilised country?
      ..and they are the ones who say "Fuck 'em. ..and every other undercivilized shithole in the world"?

      Nice.

      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
    2. Re:Eh, so what, it's Japan by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      I'd say yes.

      Japan is no longer on my list for places to visit. So is UK, Russia, China, and few others. I'm a tourist. I can't vote for people representing those countries directly. I vote with my money.

  57. My laptop has a fingerprint scanner by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    I suppose you typed that post with your knuckles
    My laptop has a fingerprint scanner as a "security" device which seems rather amusing when you consider the fact the the one place you can guarantee to find my fingerprints is on my laptop. I wonder if constant typing makes lifting a clear individual fingerprint unlikely?

    In any case it is quite convenient, even if it isn't especially secure. That's what counts right?
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  58. Circumvention device! by MWoody · · Score: 1

    I'd love to set up a stand selling gloves just past one of these checkpoints.

    1. Re:Circumvention device! by SterlingSylver · · Score: 1

      I realize that slashdotters have a dim view of the IQs of government officials, but do we really think that an immigration official will be so baffled by someone's solid black fingerprint marks that they won't notice the gloves?

      (Also, Coming soon: In a non-free society, only criminals will wear gloves!)

    2. Re:Circumvention device! by MWoody · · Score: 1

      Just PAST the checkpoint. As in, you get fingerprinted, and they see you walk 10 feet and buy a pair of gloves.

  59. Who is Disney working for by John+Jamieson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As some AC posted, I went with my family to Disney World last week, and they had finger print scanners. Needless to say I refused, and the lady said "what are you afraid of, unless you have something to hide". I reamed her a bit for insinuating that I might have something to hide.
    Then she started with the bogus line "It is not a fingerprint, it is a biometric. All it does is measure the width and length of your finger".
    When I still refused, and asked for my parking and admission back, at that point they let my family in quite quickly. Lesson? keep fighting!

    THE BIG QUESTION... Where does disney store these, how long, and given the cozy relationship between Disney and the US government - how many of us believe they will not end up in the hands of the government?

    1. Re:Who is Disney working for by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No arguing necessary - Disney has a policy to allow people who object to using the finger scanner to show a government issued photo ID instead.

      While cast members working the gates should be aware of this policy, it's downplayed; it's all about getting people in as efficiently as possible while maintaining control over tickets (shared tickets / fraud was a huge problem before), which is the driving force behind having such scanners.

      Personally, I have no problem with the finger scan - it's fast and much easier than searching around for my ID ... and for folks staying on property travelling with children, not using finger scan can make things more complicated for young teens who are old enough to travel on their own within Disney World, but don't yet have photo ID of their own.

      In an ideal world, there would be no finger scanners, but it's a reality ... for those paranoid, one work-around is to paste a fake print over their finger - best for one day visit / short vacation.

      Also, this is a, admittedly more complicated, way to test whether Disney really deletes fingerprint data or not after 30 days - they claim to ... but do they really? -be interesting to see that tested. But I digress.

      Ron

    2. Re:Who is Disney working for by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      The fingerprint stamps used at major banks when you cash a check (but are not a customer of that bank) should also be a good concern.

    3. Re:Who is Disney working for by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exact same experience for me at Sea World in San Diego. I refused and was told that it doesn't take a print, just measures the length and width of my finger. They "allowed" me to show ID, instead.

  60. Fingerprinting, Iris Scans, etc WorldWide Soon by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before biometrics become mandatory most everywhere - and I'm not talking just international travel, but domestic travel as well.

    On an aside, several U.S. states, including California have required fingerprint(s) for one to merely get a drivers license for decades regardless of where one plans to travel...

    Speaking of travel - even within the U.S., there are internal checkpoints where people (drivers, bikers, etc) are stopped and asked for ID and/or questioned about their activities - some checkpoints are for catching illegal aliens while others are for checking for contraband - typically invasive plants, foods, insects, etc that themselves are legal, but not for transport in/out of some areas, and then there are the DUI checkpoints and Safety checkpoints.

    Point is that people in the U.S. have long tolerated / accepted many other invasive actions without any uprising. I expect that fingerprinting won't be any different in the longrun...

    Many here speak of not traveling to such and such place due to fingerprinting ... but keep in mind that young people growing up today are increasingly accustom to being watched, and many actually feel more secure being constantly monitored - they far outnumber the folks who avoid travel due to fingerprinting, etc ...

    And it will get worse too - requiring DNA samples, IRIS scans, RFID tagging (already happening via passports), etc...

    So again, it's just a matter of time before most everyone who wishes to travel anywhere is tagged, photographed, and profiled; barring a major revolution, it's inevitable.

    Ron

    1. Re:Fingerprinting, Iris Scans, etc WorldWide Soon by ppanon · · Score: 1

      "I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own. I resign. " - The Prisoner

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Fingerprinting, Iris Scans, etc WorldWide Soon by Riquez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but keep in mind that young people growing up today are increasingly accustom to being watched, and many actually feel more secure being constantly monitored
      I agree &, although not so young anymore, it is because where I am from originally (UK) the chances of being hassled or mugged when out after 7pm were greater than 40%.
      Reassuring to know then, that on the occasions when my fears came true the police said...
      • Um, the cameras were facing the wrong way.
      • Oh, they are long gone now.
      • Ah yes, we got them on camera, but we don't know who they are. Wow, they really gave you a good kicking didn't they?
      • Yes, the fingerprints are probably on the window & the stick, but you've been watching too much CSI.
      My point? The intensions may be justified, the reality a disappointment.
      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  61. "othercountrieshavebeendoingthisforyears" And? by koinu · · Score: 1

    This does not make it more acceptable. Next time they want a scan of some other private parts of your body.

    Databases everywhere. And who takes care of the security implied in holding such sensitive data? I'm waiting patiently until some cracker gets into the US flight DB and then all the credit card data is stolen. I also don't like criminals to have access to my fingerprint data that is used for conviction somewhere.

    Is this difficult to understand that this is wrong?

  62. The Panoptikon is coming .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next step is to slowly drip.. drip.. drip.. information into public consciousness that you're watched all the time, and then the conversion is complete..

  63. Bad for Martial Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if there are any other geeky martial artists here, but I travel to Japan every once in a while for things like exams and budo events. That's not going to happen anymore until this political bullshit is cleared up. I don't mind *them* taking my fingerprints. But I very much object to sharing this with unspecified countries! Fuck you Japan.

    Next time a Japanese tourist whom I suspect is a politician asks me to take a picture of him in front of some building, there will be repercussions! That picture will be BLURRY!

  64. Another way to protest...request for help by JimBobJoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It so happens that Tokyo and Chicago are vying to be considered for the Summer Olympics in 2016. I would like to put together a campaign (from a variety of people, civil liberty/privacy groups, etc) to ask that the International Olympic Committee reject any host city application whose nation requires photographing/fingerprinting as a condition of entry. Such a condition violates the human dignity principle of the IOC charter, as well as potentially surpressing visitors to that host nation (since many believe that the dropoff in visitors to the US is related to US-VISIT.

    1. Re:Another way to protest...request for help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that, the Olympic committee is not exactly known for their democratic ideals. Do some research on the subject; start with Samaranch, then look at the various corruption scandals in the IOC, the insane security measures in Athens, their sponsor / broadcast deals and how interacts with press freedom, their going after any company with olympic in their name etc (I'm sure their is more). These people don't give a fuck, they are borderline fascists (especially Samaranch) to think they as a group will care about human dignity is hopelessly naive. (Or have I just grown cynical ;P )

    2. Re:Another way to protest...request for help by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hopefully there are strong alternatives to BOTH Chicago and Tokyo then.

    3. Re:Another way to protest...request for help by Averyge+Joe · · Score: 1

      Excellent point, deny them the Olympics. Hit them in the pocket book where they'll feel it. What cynical, miserable, dried up lives the people who develop these policies must lead. It would be sad except for the fact that they're aggressively attempting to drag us all down with them.

  65. Korean Prejudice Against non-Koreans by reporter · · Score: 1
    The aforementioned article includes several inaccurate statements. Below are the facts.

    1. According to a report by "The Economist", the Japanese government, by 2005, had apologized 17 times for the role of the Japanese in World War II. The Japanese government even gave a written apology to the Korean government.

    2. According to a report by "The Washington Post", Tokyo paid $500 million of war reparations to Seoul in 1965.

    3. According to a CNN report, a "Time" magazine report, and several other reports, Nazi symbols are popular in Korea. "A small photo of Adolf Hitler adorns the entrance to the Fifth Reich, an upscale watering hole in Seoul's Shinchon university district. A larger picture of the Führer hangs across from the bar, where waiters and waitresses with swastika arm badges mix drinks that have names like 'Adolf Hitler' and 'Dead'."

    4. Koreans have viciously treated non-Koreans in South Korea. The Chinese immigrant community has succeeded in nearly every Asian country (including Japan). The exception is South Korea. The Chinese population in Korea declined from 50,000 to 10,000. "Many Chinese claim they were forced out by the Seoul authorities."

    5. A reporter at "The Economist" wrote, "Koreans have always prided themselves on ethnic homogeneity, and feared and distrusted outsiders."

    6. The U.S. State department has warned, "Citizenship [in Korea] is based on blood, not location of birth, and Koreans must show as proof their family genealogy. Thus, ethnic Chinese born and resident in Korea cannot obtain citizenship or become public servants."

    7. "Purity" of blood is extremely important in Korean culture. "Traditional reverence for familial bloodlines [in Korea] and the social stigmas attached to adoptees as well as children who are disabled, mixed race or born out of wedlock limit local enthusiasm for the [adoption] program. Thus, international adoption continues to outpace domestic." "Because of societal values emphasizing the importance of bloodline, children were adopted domestically only by extended family or blood relatives."

    Although a tiny percentage of Japanese citizens supports a revisionist history (as evidenced by the shocking memorial next to Yasukuni Shrine), the overwhelming majority of Japanese is aware of the correct history of World War II: specifically, the Japanese military initiated a war of aggression.

    However, this unfortunate history is no justification, whatsoever, for the the racist and bigotted attitudes of the Koreans. Korean citizens who reside in Japan but who refuse Japanese citizenship should be treated as foreigners. These Korean "refuseniks" are loyal to either South Korea or North Korea. The Japanese government should fingerprint all Korean "refuseniks".

    1. Re:Korean Prejudice Against non-Koreans by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      On point 5- None of the Koreans I have seen are like that. They move to China (Shanghai, where I live now), they settle, learn Chinese, and generally blend in (well, sort of-one odd habit I noticed with a group of old Korean people is that they'll bring a bag of chili peppers to a restaurant if they think the food's not spicy enough...). It's not like they "feared and distrusted outsiders" at all.

      Although I suppose if they move out of Korea that says that they are willing to blend in wherever they move to, as opposed to those who don't.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    2. Re:Korean Prejudice Against non-Koreans by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Just a couple more comments. I think the main things Koreans (like my friend) are angry about is the "revisionist" history books that keep coming out. It's almost like German government approving elementary school history books casting doubt on whether Holocaust ever happened or not. This is mentioned in the articles you quote ('sorry, I couldn't read the Economist one, as I'm not an economist, I wouldn't pay to read it).

      I guess what the Koreans want is moral justification. They want the Japanese to say that the conditions during the occupations is as horrible as Koreans say. And a general apology for a generic war crime wouldn't do (after all, a loser in a world war always will need to apologize for *something*). If you want yet another bad analogy, what if Germany did acknowledge that there was a concentration camp and some bad things happened, and apologized for it. But what if they went on to say that "Jews were there for their own protection" (Japanese claim some "comfort women" volunteered of their free will, without deception by the government) or "there were no gas chambers" (Japanese deny that experiments on humans as Koreans claim happened)? I suppose to some degree, it really depends on whether what Koreans claim is even true, but to a Korean mind, it's true beyond doubt, and some "eyewitness accounts" only bolster that belief. So, you have these people who believe these horrible things were done to them, and here's their neighbor, who apologizes for (proverbially) robbing the house, but then denies (again, proverbially), that he raped his wife.

      From what I can see, Koreans just feel that Japan is admitting to the minimum it needs to (I mean, it's pretty hard to deny that Japan started a war of agression, so they apologize) while denying some of the more egregious crimes (that are harder to prove that it happened). And almost always, it looks like Korea needs to squeeze apologies (what little there is) out of Japan. I mean, the war ended in 1945. And it took until 1965 for the reparations to come in?

      And again, going back to the refuseniks, I still don't see how simple act of refusing to be citizens of country that they reside in make them racists and bigots. After all, there are plenty of permanent residents in U.S. who are eligible for citizenship and yet choose not to apply. I suppose they must just hate U.S. to live here permanently and yet not got citizenship. And, from what I can tell, they are pretty much treated the same way as citizens. I mean, I had no idea this co-worker (and a friend) of Taiwanese descent was only a permanent resident (after all, we've been on business trips together oversees) until some one of those get-the-vote out people walked up to him and he said he couldn't vote because he wasn't a citizen.

      P.S. I do have to agree that Koreans are pretty xenophobic. In fact, that's the main thing about this friend of mine that drives me crazy every now and then. And I mean, he lived in U.S. for, what, last 15 years or so, so you'd think he's pretty Americanized now ... but from my point of view, he's more xenophobic than even know-nothingers. I can only imagine how it is in the country he's from.

  66. Re:Who hasn't been fingerprinted? Well I haven't by slashbart · · Score: 1

    I have never been fingerprinted, and I have had a security clearance several times (Dutch, French and US), because I've worked as a civilian at space centers (Marshall and Kennedy), and military aviation (in France). They just did a background check and verified my identity with my passport. The U.S. clearance was in the early nineties, maybe its different now.

    So the fact that the U.S. is now not so slowly turning into a surveillance state does not imply that the rest of the world is going to do the same.

    Bart

  67. Japan is a racist society by Cannelloni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are special bars för nihonjin... Racial segregation is still an everyday reality in Japan, and most people seem to think it's perfectly normal. Imagine if governments enforced special race laws in Europa and the United States. We'd have riots and demonstrations, but in Japan, all is quit and sedated.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    1. Re:Japan is a racist society by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Places that appear "friendly" are often not.

      I just came back from Switzerland a month or so ago, and they just had their elections. One of the major parties competing campaigned on a poster where three white sheep kicked a black sheep off the Swiss flag. Another poster featured a dark-skinned hand reaching for a basket of Swiss passports.

      And I think I heard that this party won the election too.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  68. An update for re-entry permit holders! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Just found the Re-Entry Japan Blogspot page on which Gaijin provocateur Arudo Debito has posted that at Narita there will be at least one booth set aside for re-entry permit holders.

    I also see some notes that initially, mixed nationality families (like mine) with at least one Japanese parent and children under 16 will be allowed to use the Japanese counters. (possibly to avoid the embarrassment of having the kids ask why Daddy has to be fingerprinted by a criminal)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  69. You cannot renounce other citizen ships by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That cannot be done, canada at japans request cannot say, "ok we delete you from canada" it cannot be done.

    Japan might not recognize you canadian passport, but canada still will.

    I may be wrong, but when I checked Italy, they said that they will never remove you from being an italian unless you committed war crimes.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:You cannot renounce other citizen ships by darkfire5252 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the country how they feel about it, I suppose. But, renouncing your citizenship is not really about asking the country to not consider you as a citizen, its about telling the country that you no longer consider yourself one and allowing them to update their records, etc. In some countries it's fairly easy. IIRC (from the US passport) in the United States, it's as easy as telling any member of the state department that you renouce your citizenship.

    2. Re:You cannot renounce other citizen ships by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Japan can take away your Japanese citizenship if they find out.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  70. How are people supposed to misuse my fingerprints? by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Really, think about it.

    a) Want my fingerprints? Sure, have at them. I leave them on everything I touch, after all.

    b) Fingerprints could be used to identify me, if there were an American database of fingerprints I was in. I suppose the shadowy database could connect me to all sorts of private info that I wouldn't want the Japanese government having access to... of course, why would you query the shadowy American database by fingerprint when you could do it by a unique identifying number, name, birthdate, and place of birth. Good thing that the Japanese government doesn't ask me for those at immigration -- they just get to see my passport. Oh waaaaait.

    Seriously, if Japan and America decide to conspire to screw me, I'm screwed. That is true with or without fingerprints. Thus, all this matters to me is that I lose another 5 minutes on top of a 16 hour commute.

  71. To sum this up : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    -- Benjamin Franklin

  72. consistent by crazymulgogi · · Score: 1

    US citizen: "How dare they! I, for one, will most certainly not be leaving my foreigner-fingerprinting police-state-becoming country to visit that foreigner-fingerprinting police-state-becoming country!"

  73. Yeah, because that is only true in japan by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Every country has such places, remember just because a white american can visit most places in white holland, that doesn't mean a black american could. Racism is still very active and it is more accepted in areas were racial diversity is low.

    But lets turn this around, are whites accepted in all black or muslim places in the west?

    One amazing piece of racist behaviour was done here in holland a while back. People called employers and pretended to be muslims trying for a job interview. They claimed that they encountered racism when some of the people were refused, while if they tried with person who didn't sound like a muslim, they did get invited for a futher interview.

    The most amazing racism however was NOT by the employers but by the people doing the experiment, it didn't even occur to them to call muslim employers and pretend to be gay or jewish and see if they would get invited. Racism is often very easy to ignore if you don't want to see it.

    There are no such things as bars in japan that are legally for japanese only. They just got clubs that just don't give memberships to foreigners, or where a foreigner is treated so coldly that you wouldn't want to visit. Is it racism if the heavies in a club stand so close you just leave? Yes it is, but that happens in all kinds of places. People are racist.

    For instance, the western religions have been under some pressure to allow women priests. Why is there no such pressure on female imans to be allowed? Because the people fighting sexism are racist?

    Note that this measure of fingerprinting is NOT racist. It is NOT based on race, a japanese person who lost citizenship would also be subjected to it, despite being of the same race. Wake up, most of the world has different rules for foreigners then nationals.

    Truly if you believe that there is one single country in the world that doesn't have places where foreigners are not welcome, you have lived a very sheltered life.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah, because that is only true in japan by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      No, sorry, "Japanese Only" signs are very common in Japan these days, unfortunately. And YES, finger printing is racist, because it will mainly apply to foreigners, i.e., non-Japanese people. I have lost all respect for Japan, and I am ashamed to drive a Japanese car http://k.lenz.name/LB/archives/000973.html http://www.wordpress.tokyotimes.org/?p=1900 http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=6669 http://www.debito.org/misawaexclusions.html Open your eyes.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    2. Re:Yeah, because that is only true in japan by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Did I deny it happens? I seen that site before, it is hardly new.

      What I am saying it that this kinda thing happens in other countries as well. Racism is on the increase or perhaps it just never has gone away.

      I an Israeli born dutch national in Holland, I often worked in the past with immigrants and foreigners and racism is rampant. Simple example, perfectly nice cafeteria I used to go to, until one day a black co-worked joined me. It sure changed my opinion of the place. They had magazines for the customers to read, he was told that they were for not to be taken outside. Nobody had ever told me that. In fact I often read them outside on their terras when it was summer.

      Go out to some clubs and see how people with the wrong skintone (this guy was greek) are stopped and asked for their membership card. I had been there before, nobody ever asked me.

      Years ago I was told at a new job that they were glad the temp agency had sent a white guy. Other time someone went into a long rant of how he didn't like to work with some races/religions, had some fun pointing out my place of birth (I am not religious but if I have to be noted down, put down jew).

      So perhaps Japan is a little more open about. In holland such signs would be trouble, so they come up with different ways to exclude those they don't want.

      Note how the article that has this white guy going around japanese clubs asking them for their policy says that a club HAS TO HAVE A BOUNCER. I think it is amazing that a club doesn't have to have one. It kinda makes clear WHY racism happens. Would you want a race in your club that thinks you NEED bouncers?

      The simple fact is that in holland a lot of the times there are problems, it is from people who are non-white. If a club owner has to throw out ten people and all ten are immigrants, then perhaps it would save time to just not allow them in in the first place.

      Racist? Abso-fucking-lutely. Perhaps if trouble makers were dealt with more severely, if the club owner didn't feel he had to be the police to protect his other customers, perhaps then there wouldn't be a problem.

      I am not saying the situation in Japan is correct, I am asking you to see how the same happens in your own country, just because you happen to the majority race (let me take a wild guess, you are a caucasian in the west) and don't experience it yourselve, doesn't mean it ain't there.

      Dress up as a cowboy and go into a black club. Dress up as a jew and go into a muslim hangout. Go and see racism. Sometimes you see these kinda tests, people dress up as another religion/sex/race/sexuality and go and see just what the truth is about hatred, they never come away disappointed. Start commenting on Japan ONLY when you are certain that your own country isn't just as racist.

      Does the US fingerprint foreigners? Why yes it does.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    3. Re:Yeah, because that is only true in japan by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      You are right of course. Attitudes like this exist everywhere, but hopefully we can develop into a world where people are more tolerant and insightful, and look at things from a different perspective and see a much wider picture. At least I would like to live n a world like that.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  74. Cancelled trip by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Well, I cancelled my summer holiday to Japan, a country I always wanted to visit. I will not visit a country that treats a visitor like a common criminal, which is why I don't go to the U.S. any more either. The countries that are doing this are losing out on tourist money - tough sh*t!!!

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  75. I ticked yes accidentally once by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

    The guy on the desk just said "Oh, you need to put 'no' for that - I assume you're not a terrorist right?". How we laughed.

    Not all immigration staff are idiots, some are quite nice.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  76. Not that, but other things. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    The Slashdot posting offered two links to two different articles, one a year old and one which is only a month old. Each article gives a different bit of perspective on an issue which has clearly been boiling for some time. The second article from this year places the launch date of the program as November 20th.

    I find the whole issue annoying in the extreme, though not only because I don't want to be finger-printed, but because of the result of such laws. --That is, the overall effect is that such actions discourage people from traveling. Whenever a system goes fascist, they always try to prevent people from from traveling to other places. It's hard to realize just how oppressed you are, or just how much you are being lied to about other nations when you have no way to physically compare perspectives. Many people in the States, for instance, think that France is a horrid place to live and that the social services there don't work.

    Japan is definitely under the rule of the Right these days. Hopefully they'll be able to undo all the damage which is being done to their country before it reaches the irreversible point. --Their government recently allowed new laws drafted by their department of defense dictating that school children must be indoctrinated with nationalist propaganda in the classroom. Charming. Classically, this means that war of some kind is about ten years down the road.


    -FL

  77. Racism in Japan by dj_tla · · Score: 1

    I wrote a piece for my school's paper on racism and xenophobia in Japan, as a response to the new fingerprinting law. It goes into a bit more depth about the other issues facing foreigners in Japan. http://www.themanitoban.com/2007-2008/1114/127.The.Land.of.the.Rising.Shun.php

    1. Re:Racism in Japan by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I read it with interest. It was well researched and written.
      Unfortunately i don't think the japs will change much.
      Yes, they are in dire need of new people as Economist and TIME magazine have repeatedly pointed out, but the people will not change.
      My friend's experiences in Tokyo were very illuminating. They don't even sit next to you on a crowded subway nor do they shake hands with you much. Instead they bow.
      And when you move inland, children point fingers at you, pull your shirt and trousers and point at you as if you were a different beast, since they never have seen someone from outside their puny little island.
      It is MUCH worse inland rather than in Tokyo.

      They never have changed since 1930s and will never.

      Let them decline slowly into obscurity so that a hundred years from now, our grand-children will read about the threatened tribe of the japs who number about a hundred.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  78. Appeal to IOC? Over human rights?? by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    It so happens that Tokyo and Chicago are vying to be considered for the Summer Olympics in 2016. I would like to put together a campaign (from a variety of people, civil liberty/privacy groups, etc) to ask that the International Olympic Committee reject any host city application whose nation requires photographing/fingerprinting as a condition of entry. Such a condition violates the human dignity principle of the IOC charter, as well as potentially surpressing visitors to that host nation (since many believe that the dropoff in visitors to the US is related to US-VISIT.

    While I agree with the sentiment of your idea, the International Olympic Committee is only concerned about the financial aspects of the application. Well, logistics too, but they don't give a damn is the efficiency of logistics is used for oppressive purposes as long as the financials give them green light.

    When the IOC awarded the fabled Olympic Games to the oppressive dictatorship in Beijing they publicly (and superficially) declared that the Games would result in greater freedoms for the Chinese (term which they ostensibly apply to the neighbouring peoples under Chinese military occupation as well). However exactly the opposite is true. The Chinese Communist Party, with complete control over the police, paramilitary and military forces, has the logistical muscle to prevent any and all dissent aimed at the regime or their Berlin '36-esque olympic party. The foreign press was given nominally increased freedom (which ends exactly when the games are over!) to travel and report in most parts of actual China (while the occupied Tibet is completely out of bounds) but in reality all reporters are still followed by the regime, people talking to them are harassed or detained and the reporters may still get kicked out at the pleasure of the local or central Party cadres.

    Simply put, the supposed openness of the Chinese regime and the human rights interests of the IOC are nothing but a sham. In fact, top IOC officials have even picked up the Chinese Communist Party habit of lashing out at the "annoying and meddling human rights groups" who are trying to raise the issue of worsening human rights conditions in China with the IOC. Instead of showcasing the brotherhood and equality between peoples on this planet, the olympics have now officially become just another faceless money-grabbing organization willing to (ab)use its commercial prominency for rehabilitating and normalizing the image of an oppressive dictatorship which continues to hold its peaceful neighbouring peoples under genocidal occupation...

    What comes to the battle between Chicago (USA) and Tokyo (Japan) in vying for the olympic circus of 2016, it would appear that travelling to either destination subjects the visitor to the same humiliating and xenophobic treatment upon arrival. However the saddest thing about democratic or semi-democratic countries imposing these kinds of surveillance measures on foreign visitors is that it gives the authoritarian regimes fake justification for further increasing their own gestapo-like measures against any potential domestic opposition. Unbelievably, the Chinese regime even publically plays up their role as a "US partner in the war against terror" as they "strike hard" (also the name of the campaign) against the Tibetans, Uighurs or Mongols who dare to as much as speak about freedom from occupation.

    Sadly, the American right-wing lead marketing campaign about terrorism (see: using external threats in world history and politics) appears to have turned all of East Asia (with the possible exception of Taiwan) back towards more xenophobic policies and even militarism. Well, if one strongly believes in the religious inevitability of armageddon then this is certainly the way to go!

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    1. Re:Appeal to IOC? Over human rights?? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the sentiment of your idea, the International Olympic Committee is only concerned about the financial aspects of the application. Well, logistics too, but they don't give a damn is the efficiency of logistics is used for oppressive purposes as long as the financials give them green light.

      I don't disagree with you on this. I should have added to my original note that I think such a campaign would be more effective at embarrassing the Japanese and reminding people of the the difficulties of travel to the US more than it would actually convince the IOC not to consider Tokyo/Chicago.

  79. Fingerprint security already busted by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isn't it rather easy to provide fake fingerprints? Using their kitchen-sink laboratory, the Mythbusters created false prints which were good enough to fool the most expensive fingerprint door locks. Are the scanners at airports any more sophisticated?

    1. Re:Fingerprint security already busted by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link?

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  80. Description of the new gate system by mattr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the content of an email a friend forwarded to me, originally sent from the European Business Council in Japan to Europeans doing business in Japan. After the clipped email is the content of the MS Word attachment describing a new quick pass gate system, which it seems they got from the Japanese government.

    I lost my first post which included this and a small rant. Whatever. I am quite unhappy about this, and it seems to reverse the direction they were going, but the U.S. remains the king of security theater and it is an easy political win I suppose. They already got my photo and fingerprint from my passport and old foreigner card but I know I'm going to hate this. If it is in fact required.

    Forwarded Email:

    ---

    Further to my message on new immigration procedures last week, this is to
    inform you that Ministry of Justice has now issued instructions in English
    on how to undergo pre-registration for the new semi automatic gate system to
    be established at Narita Airport on November 20.
    Please find attached the instruction document, which should be available
    soon on the MoJ website.

    ---

    [For Foreigners]

    (Reference Material for the PR Dept.)

    Operation of the Automated Gate

    Ministry of Justice, Immigration Bureau

    1. Introduction

    Automated gates will be placed at Narita Airport from November 20th, 2007, in order to improve convenience of immigration procedures by simplifying and accelerating them. We would like to ask foreigners who wish to use the automated gates to provide their personal identification information (fingerprints and a facial portrait) in advance and register themselves as applicants in order to use the gate.

    2. Registration as an Applicant to Use the Automated Gate
    1. Required Items for Registration
    1. Valid passport (including Re-entry Permit) and re-entry permission
    2. Application form to use the automated gate
    2. Where and When to Register
    We will be accepting applications from November 20th at the locations stated below:
    1. Tokyo Regional Immigration Bureau
    Application Counter for re-entry permission (2F) 9:00-16:00 (Except Saturdays, Sundays, National Holidays and December 29th to January 3rd)
    2. Narita Airport District Immigration Office
    The departure inspection area at South Wing of Passenger Terminal 1: 9:00-17:00
    The departure inspection area at the South Exit of Passenger Terminal 2: 9:00-17:00
    3. Registration Procedures

    Submit your application form with your passport and provide fingerprints of both index fingers and a facial portrait.

    Then, when the official affixes a registration stamp on your passport, the registration procedure is complete. In principle, you can use the gate from that day forward.

    4. Points of Concern for the Registration
    1. Time Limit of Registration

    You can register until the expiration date of your passport or the expiration date of your re-entry permit, whichever comes earlier.

    2. Registration Restrictions

    In some cases, such as when you cannot provide fingerprints, you may not be able to register.

    3. Using and Providing the Registered Information

    We will manage information including fingerprints and facial portraits provided at the registration as personal information set forth in laws on protection of personal informati

    1. Re:Description of the new gate system by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1
      Using and Providing the Registered Information We will manage information including fingerprints and facial portraits provided at the registration as personal information set forth in laws on protection of personal information held by administrative agencies, and the information will not be used or provided beyond the range allowed for in these laws.

      This may be an important tool in our fight against this system. Under the new strict privacy laws (April 04) if any information is kept about you, the keepers of the data have to provide what information is being kept upon request.

      We foreigners may be able to launch a campaign repeatedly asking them to provide what information is being kept and therefore make this system a huge pain in the ass for the Japanese Government that jammed it down our throats.

      I think we should look into this option and make it as easy as possible for foreigners to make these requests.

  81. well theres always changing your fingerprints by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

    i once heard of a way with powdered drano, cutting a small cut with an exacto knife in the second layer of skin(the one right before you bleed), putting a drano granule in it screaming and writhing for 10 minutes, repeat 3-5 times on each finger, doesn't leave any surface scarring yet completely changes your fingerprints due to under skin scarring. if you really don't want to get fingerprinted, do that lol... Disclaimer: Author does not endorse this idea, whether you do this is up to you, and I take no repsonsibility as to your actions. Translation for non nerds who MIGHT be reading slashdot: if it hurts really bad and you hate me for giving you a working but painful idea, its your own fault don't try suing me =D

    --
    -Noc
  82. An old idea, but a good idea by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    Just saying...

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  83. Dear Japan - I will not visit by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    There goes my plan for a holiday in the next year or so. Thank you for the warning.
    Dear Japan: Please note that people currently avoid the US for this crap, and now we avoid you.
    As much as I'd love to visit the Land Of Anime.. No.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  84. .jp govt paid Accenture only $1,000 to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  85. no fingerprints? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

    What about plastic surgery which removes fingerprints?

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    1. Re:no fingerprints? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      CSI: Detective, we found no fingerprints at the crime scene.
      Detective: No fingerprints, eh? Well that can only mean one thing.
      CSI: What's that?
      Detective: Our perpetrator is none other than Slashdot's own someone1234

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:no fingerprints? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      CSI1: We found no fingerprints at the crime scene.
      CSI2: No fingerprints, eh? Well that can only mean one thing.
      CSI1: What's that?
      CSI2: Our perpetrator is none other than Slashdot's own someone1234 There... fixed it for you.

      Don't you know that CSI do ALL the work? Detectives only eat donuts.

      BTW... CSI2 just HAS to be Horatio Caine.
      The only man that defeated both Chuck Norris AND Jack Bauer with both hands behind his back.
      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  86. Its the electoral system. by dforreal · · Score: 1

    Doubtful that you'll see anyone but the LDP running things for long time. Prior to the electoral reforms put in place by the coalition government formed in 1993, the multi-member constituencies allowed the LDP to run many candidates in a single district and effectively have each one try to cater to a specific interest group, and generally being able to sweep most if not all seats in the diet. However, as is typical in Japanese political dealings, the LDP generally tried to incorporate the views of the opposition in forming a consensus, so very little opposition formed. Electoral reform, with the new system being a mixture of proportional representation and single-member constituencies, did little to lessen the symptoms of de-facto single-party rule.

  87. It's fucking digusting and an extreme insult..... by Karakuri · · Score: 1

    ....that the Japanese are doing this, especially from their cultural view.

    I live in Japan. Yes, like many others, I am an English teacher.
    I teach their CHILDREN, I mean, middle and elementary, and they want to brand me a criminal?
    Don't get me wrong- I speak Japanese bilingually (unlike most of my fellow teachers), but just because the others
    cannot does not make them anymore of a security risk than I.

    The thing is, it's true- FINGERPRINTING IN JAPAN is reserved only for proven criminals.

    And this law treats everyone the same. Like a criminal.

    Doesn't matter how long you've been here, what your job is, as far as *many* Japanese are concerned, you are
    dangerous simply because you are a foreigner. This is due to: drunken fighting Russians (in my area), Pot smoking
    teachers from my USA (also arrested in my area), and a general fucking SAFETY COMPLEX of the entire population. I won't even begin
    to impress upon you the depth of how far the last one goes, but just so you get an idea, they devote national TV time to
    discussing single local problems of mundane risk- I just watched a program show a whole news story on how people in one
    village are pissed that everyone pulls U-Turns in their intersection. It's fucking surreal. This is my second time living
    here, and I still can't believe it. Daily life here is a continual safety thesis overanalyzed by an increasingly frightened
    and xenophobic populous. All it takes is one of us fucking up and the whole nation notices- take Mr. Pothead- he had to apologize
    on NATIONAL TV.

    Couple this with every single portrayal of foreigners on shows, commercials, & TV personalities, which paint us all as blithering otaku
    idiots incapable of speaking Japanese without overly emphasised ridiculous accents, and THAT FUCKING VIDEO from the Ministry, which only
    makes us look worse, and it does it with such blunt smugness and everyones favorite keywords "9-11" & "terror", and the Orwellian
    doublespeak "Fingerprinting YOU is for YOUR safety"...

    If this was addressed to the Japanese people, they would be infurated & insulted beyond belief in the way their own standards
    of conduct are being completely SHIT upon as they are smiled at by the woman in the video.

    So why aren't the Japanese complaining about this labeling of people working here and 99% living peaceably?

    Because it's not them. Because it's anyone BUT them. Complete moral disregard. I love the Japanese, but HOW VERY UNJAPANESE THIS IS.
    My personal biometric data is none of your goddamned business UNLESS I COMMIT AN ACTUAL CRIME. Excuse me while I burn my fingers on the
    stove oh so conveiniently.

  88. Wrong filter by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    The problem with these measures is that they filter out the wrong part of the spectrum. People that has nothing to lose, that travels to become an "illegal" immigrant keep going, same with terrorists or any other evildoer. While the regular and "legal" tourists or workers think twice before traveling.

  89. Don't dish out if you can't take it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA have been fingerprinting *and* photographing visitors for a long time. Maybe if others finally start doing the same to you now, you'll get off of your fat arses and lobby your politicians to have that changed (or don't you think that it's a bad thing? Then don't complain about it when others are doing it to you, either).

    So, yeah - go Japan!

  90. Yeah this is terrible. . . I did it as a child at by n2art2 · · Score: 1

    The local Library in my small rural Iowa, USA town. That's right as a kid in the early eighties I went to the public library to get my fingerprints taken and put into the system. We was told it was for security. In case a child ended up lost, they could ID them (the body) when found.
     
    But sure it must be an outrage to have adults get their fingerprints taken. Um seriously. . . if they want to jail you, then they'll bring you in to the police station and fingerprint you then. And if you are worried that you migth get arrested for doing something illegal just because they have your fingerprint on file, then your probably already doing something illigal.

    --
    Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
  91. Not trusting the government by Descalzo · · Score: 1

    This is one of the many reasons I don't want the government in charge of my family's health care.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  92. Conrad Black managed it... by debest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a very high profile case of someone who did, in fact, successfully renounce his Canadian citizenship.

    Of course, if you look into Conrad's story, he wants it back now!

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:Conrad Black managed it... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian citizen, I hope we don't give that citizenship back, and further, that he's never let back into Canada. He made such a fuss over it, in order to accept a British lordship, that to give it back would give the message (well, reinforce, really) that if you have enough money and influence, it doesn't matter what you did you can still get your way. Even if you're a convicted criminal.

      I have no desire to see him sit in a Canadian jail, taking up my tax money. He made his bed, he can lie in it.

    2. Re:Conrad Black managed it... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Conrad might not be the best example because he renounced his Canadian citizenship in order to do something (become a British lord) that Canadian citizens are not permitted to do (by Canada).

  93. Re:Um, Cool. Sounds like a good idea to me. by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    Well, I have to say the timing sucks for me.. but it could be worse. At the moment I had plans drawn up, plane flights being discussed and dates being proposed for a Nice Holiday In Japan. I've yet to action the re-allocation of this plan.. but part of it will be to send a nice email to the Japanese Embassy in Canberra thanking them for their information and events over the last few years and advising them that I will never visit Japan to my great sorrow.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  94. There's nothing to laugh/smirk about here by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    First off, if you follow Japanese politics, this is much less reciprocity than it is collaboration.

    Secondly, I think we can all agree that both the Japanese and the US policies are an invasion of privacy. No one should be pleased that either exists. The fact that the US has a similar program in place has no bearing on the fact that this policy is crap regardless of the country implementing it.

    I haven't visited the US since they've implemented their policy and, as a resident of Japan, the next time I leave the country, I won't be returning until this policy is revoked.

    From my point of view, it means that when we move back to Canada, I won't be accompanying my wife and daughter on trips back to visit her grand-parents in Kyoto. It means that for the next few years, unless I want to be fingerprinted, my holidays will be taken within the country. To anyone seriously concerned with this system and/or willing to take a stand against it, this places some serious restrictions on your ability to move freely.

  95. what do you mean invasive? by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    Having the history of every place you've lived or worked since you got to Japan right there on the back of your card is very handy when filling out those address update forms at the post office!

    I wish I could think of a sarcastic remark for that time they put the big yellow banners up in Shinagawa station encouraging everyone to turn in foreign criminals. If the Japanese spent as much money on fighting crime in general instead of blindly blaming the gaijin, the crime rate might not still be climbing.

  96. The Japanese Gov't requires proof by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely correct: the Japanese cannot force Canada to strip you of your citizenship.

    The Japanese can and do require a letter from the Canadian government stating that you have renounced your citizenship and that they will strip you of it once the Japanese government grants Japanese citizenship. If I remember correctly, most countries are signatories to a UN treaty that makes it illegal for a country to strip you of citizenship if it will leave you stateless, which is why the two-phase approach.

    If you obtain Japanese citizenship, then don't follow through with renouncing your other citizenship, the Japanese may strip you of your Japanese citizenship.

  97. No, it's wrong in any country. by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with taking a poke at either the Japanese or the Americans. This type of invasion of privacy is wrong no matter where it takes place. We should all be making it clear to both these countries that this won't be tolerated.

  98. Protection... by alexandre · · Score: 1

    So next time you take a plane to japan, just before leaving, take a candle and a needle... heat the needle a bit and put in on your finger print sideway.
    This will mark them for a few days and make them slick wheere it touches the side of the needle (Don't prick yourself though!)

  99. Racist and Bigotted Koreans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Koreans are indeed racist and bigotted. They demand the rights (e.g., voting in Japanese elections) and privileges of Japanese citizenship but refuse Japanese citizenship. These racists claim that blood line determines nation of loyalty, and for that reason, they refuse Japanese citizenship.

    These Korean racists believe that, say, Mexican-Americans are loyal to Mexico, not the USA, because their blood is "Mexican".

    Also, these Korean racists believe that responsibility for the war is inherited from one generation to the next. Even though nearly all Japanese today were born after the war and hence do not owe an apology to anyone for that atrocity, these Korean racists claim that today's Japanese still owe an apology.

    Korean racism is disgusting -- and hypocritical. Koreans (from North Korea) shot at Americans during the Korean War while Americans were protecting other Koreans (in South Korea). Why haven't the racist Koreans (in South Korea) apologized to us Americans for this act of violence by Koreans (in North Korea)? Hmmmm?

    1. Re:Racist and Bigotted Koreans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hatred just drips off of you, like the slime off a rotting corpse. How about "Racism is disgusting", or are you claiming that all Koreans that have refused Japanese citizenship are equally xenophobic, that all Koreans in N & S Korea are equally racists, that there is some essential about their blood-lines that makes them these monstrous racists?

  100. Not America's stupid airport mess... by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    No, the Americans did not start this stupid airport mess. The Arabs started it, and in specific, the Palestinians started it when they decided to enact a policy of randomly selecting civilian aircraft, hijacking them, and murdering passengers in order to focus world attention on their political situation. This hijacking and selected murder (of Jewish passengers) policy started in the late 1960s and continued until the civilized world was forced to enact 'this airport mess' in order to try and stop it.

        Please have no illusions about who is responsible for this current aircraft 'security' nightmare.

  101. Re:How are people supposed to misuse my fingerprin by BJH · · Score: 1

    I'm very glad you've decided to roll over for this, but how about considering the possibility that just maybe, some people don't like the idea of being treated the same as criminals by the country they've been living in for the last 20 years?

  102. My two cents by ArcadeX · · Score: 1

    I wanted to visit Japan, but now I think I'll pass. I realize the irony in the fact that my country does the same to others, and I've been fingerprinted for my job, the DMV, and my CHL. If this were a preventative for terrorism I could understand, but what good is having a suicide bomber's fingerprints after the fact? I don't even worry much about security these days, odds are in my lifetime my credit card numbers will be leaked or stolen, everyone has my SSN number, even my cable company, doesn't even seem like a secret any more, so what difference does fingerprinting make? Don't expect much to change, but I'll at least my my stand here, and punish Japan by denying them my money and presence, but I think they will recover.

    --
    An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
  103. Finally learning from Disney by doombob · · Score: 1

    I guess Japan is finally taking lessons from Disney World. You should see the people allowing their fingerprints to be scanned with nothing more than a smile.

  104. The Al Capone option by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    If you checked 'yes' next to 'intention to commit terrorist acts,' would they arrest you or laugh and let you through?

    Think of it as the Al Capone option. Even if they can't get you on anything else, they can nail you for lying on your immigation form.

    ...laura

  105. ...it has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...isolationist xenophobes...

  106. Re:Not America's stupid airport mess... by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

    It is no longer possible to hijack a plane.

    After 9/11, no passengers would stand by and allow hijackers to command a plane. This applies most strongly to any american planes. As an example, look what happened to the last plane on 9/11? The passengers, when they realized planes are being flown into buildings, fought back. People will always try to survive. If the choice (in the past) was sit quietly until hijackers get what they want vs. risk of getting killed, people played safe. Now, that choice is sitting quietly while plane will be crashed and you dieing or risk a death by fighting back, people will fight (safer option).

    You do not have to worry about people as much anymore as the stuff that goes onto the plane. The baggages. The parcels. Today's "security" practices are not really doing that - they are still optimized to counter 9/11. But they wouldn't work back then. The terrorists back then could still intimidate and take over a plane by bluffing (why? see above for the old mentality of what hijacking meant for safety).

    In conclusion, the reactionary "tactics" of people and policy makers (who should know better) are to blame for the "security" mess.

  107. Fingerprints in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article conveys very well my mood every time I enter the US and get fingerprinted.

  108. How is this different to the USA? by dj-nix · · Score: 1

    And how exactly is this different to the USA fingerprinting foreigners, even of "friendly" countries like Australia?

  109. MOD PARENT UP! by iknownuttin · · Score: 1

    He was modd'ed down for no reason. It was NOT "Redundant"!

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  110. Re:It's fucking digusting and an extreme insult... by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

    I lived in Japan for 8 years, speak/read/write the language well, and still use it regularly in my job today. I love Japan and at some future point, might take a posting there with my current employer. And I'm fine with them fingerprinting all non-Japanese on entry. I lived there long enough ago that I had my thumb print on my gaijin card. No big deal. When I worked for a bank in the U.S., all 10 of my fingerprints were taken and put on file with the FBI. It's a condition of employment. No big deal. If I didn't like it, I had the option of not working at a bank. If I didn't like having my thumb print on my gaijin card, I had the option of not living in Japan. Nobody made me go there. I went because I wanted to, accepting that a lot of things are different there than back home. Some I'm not so keen on, some I like very much. If the bad outweighed the good, I had the option to not go, or to not stay.

    Opinion, aside, there are a number of factual inaccuracies in your comments:

    1) Fingerprinting in Japan is not reserved only for proven criminals. Anyone charged with a crime will be fingerprinted, and Japan also has previous history with fingerprinting foreigners (maybe you've even had a thumb-print gaijin card yourself).

    2) This fingerprinting is not un-Japanese at all. If you think so, you understand both Japan and the Japanese rather poorly.

    Apart from those errors, you present a mix of arguments that aren't even being made, plus some evidence that seems to support fingerprinting, rather than oppose it:

    "drunken fighting Russians (in my area), Pot smoking teachers from my USA (also arrested in my area)"

    (Aside: sounds like you live in Hokkaido.)

    "Don't get me wrong- I speak Japanese bilingually (unlike most of my fellow teachers), but just because the others
    cannot does not make them anymore of a security risk than I."

    AFAIK no one in the Japanese government is making that claim. Certainly, the fingerprinting law doesn't provide an exemption for people who can speak Japanese.

    Sure, Japan has a strong safety culture, but so what? During my eight years in Japan, I always knew the way to Narita airport, in case I decided that I didn't like it there anymore. If you don't like the safety culture, try SE Asia. I lived there, too, and people seem to go about with casual disregard for safety, doing a lot of really dangerous stuff all the time. Maybe you'll like it better. It's certainly a change of pace, and I mostly liked SEA, except for the heavy traffic and air pollution.

    If you really believe your personal biometric data is none of your business, you have a simple solution, the same one I had. Make your way to the airport. Clearly, the Japanese government disagrees with you on that issue, and the majority of Japanese also either do so, or at least do not agree with you strongly enough to require their government not do this, after all.

    At the end of the day, it's their country, not yours or mine, and they make the rules. If you don't like the rules they make, you should get out or you'll wind up hating the place. That's not a troll, just a piece of friendly (and correct) advice from someone who lived there a long time and would have been a lifer if I hadn't married another foreigner while I was there.

  111. What if I did some "sabotage" to my fingers? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Say... get creative with a soldering iron over a bottle of vodka?

    Laughing man logo comes to mind as a logical choice. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Man_(Ghost_in_the_Shell)

    Some nice curses written in kanji would also be nice.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  112. Re:Not America's stupid airport mess... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    [...] nightmare.

    You misspelled "theater"*.

    Rich

    *So did I. I'm English. Been here too long.

  113. Great by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

    So now I won't be traveling to the states or Japan. I wonder how much moves like this affect tourism.

  114. Sadness.... by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 1

    Dammit all to hell... I've been wanting to go to Japan for about 4 years and have been slowly saving up money for a trip there. Now Japan is (until I can get trustworthy evidence that they've stopped this) on my list of "DO NOT TRAVEL" countries along with such places as China and Singapore. Dammit... The Anime Characters I love wouldn't put up with this!!!!

    --
    Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  115. Libertarians are roughly one percent... by Dobeln · · Score: 1

    ...of any population. Libertarians craz... erm, committed enough to get worked up about putting their finger on a scanner and smiling *for the webcam over the possibility that the info will be used to incriminate them for some made-up-by government crime in the future is a smaller share still (although a large portion dwells on Slashdot). Hence, the impact of travel to Japan will be negligible.

    As for the actual issue, any country has a right to know who they let in - if they want to snap a picture when I visit, I will let them. If they want me to verify my indentity by biometric means, I have no problem with that. The risk that the whole procedure will somehow harm me is likely to be far smaller than that of getting struck by lightning while doing backflips in a greased-up bathtub.

    *I speak from experience.

  116. Re:Yeah this is terrible. . . I did it as a child by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Nonsense.

    No child's fingerprints taken in the US as part of an identification process were ever put into any "system". The 10-card (or whatever) was given back to the parents. I do not know of any school that wanted to keep it either - too much file space.

    Paranoid is clearly OK on Slashdot, stupid isn't.

  117. Colombia too. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    Just thought I should mention that Colombia is also now fingerprinting foreigners applying for tourist visa renewals. They use some kind of sophisticated machine. So at least I didn't have to suffer from the indignity of black/blue ink on my fingers. It was annoying that they fingerprinted every finger on my hand. As if one weren't enough. Grrr. Still better than the US and now Japan though since you do not need to submit fingerprints just to enter the country.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  118. *I* could do without that thinking, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Now this is the thinking you need to get rid of. Just because police takes fingerprints from criminals doesn't mean by taking fingerprints you are labeled criminal. It's normal to leave fingerprints. It's cool.

    That's not how Japan works, though. It's not so much that you're being fingerprinted, it's that everyone else looks at you like you're some kind of criminal, even when you're not. You can control your own feelings and thoughts, it's everyone else who mucks it up.

    There's nothing for *me* to get over. The trouble is everyone else.

  119. It's not that different for Mexicans going to USA by miguelash · · Score: 1

    We face the same when trying to get a visa or when we enter the USA, read on...

    I'm Mexican and I applied for a visa to travel to USA on 2005. I was told by the officer, that I qualified for the visa and they would actually give it to me, but there were some other two guys with my name, weight and height that had commited some crimes in the USA, so they had to make sure it wasn't me (Imagine my surprise, it was completly unexpected to me). They took my fingerprints (anyway they take your fingerprints when you request the visa, but they asked me to take them for a second time and in another office in the USA Embassy) and sent it to the FBI, which would confirm the result (negative, of course) and they sent the visa.

    But there's some interesting points about this:
    1. You have to pay an extra fee to get your fingerprints sent to the FBI.
    2. They make you feel like you're a criminal by sending your information to the FBI to "confirm" you're not a bad guy.
    3. My lastname isn't very common in Mexico (actually it's very rare), so it's really strange to find someone with the same fullname, weight and height TWICE, and they both criminals.
    4. Many people face the same process.

    When you get into the USA they also take you fingerprints (I don't know what they do with them, anyway).

    I've been in Europe and it isn't the case, actually, Mexican citizens do not need a visa as we need it for the USA. We're free to enter and leave EU member countries and there isn't any fingerprint scanning.

    I'll be there in three weeks, I hope things haven't changed.

    Bottom line: It's difficult for a Mexican to get a visa to the USA and we receive a different treatment there, than we receive in other countries, like those in Europe.

    Sad but true.

    Miguel

  120. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Barefoot.
    BY RUNNING PAST THE COPS AND OUT HIS FRONT DOOR.
    They still haven't found him. They won't."


    Ninja.

  121. One fingered gloves for Japan and USA by H4x0r+Jim+Duggan · · Score: 1

    My thoughts exactly. Or, more specifically, one-fingered gloves. This would be more visible as a protest.

  122. That's some seriously poor security by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

    If you had clearences without even a fingerprinting to prove who you are and that you're not a criminal, then that's not particularly good security. I'm sure passports are harder to fake than drivers licenses, but I doubt it would stop anyone at all serious about espionage. A simple fingerprinting would go a long way in that case.

  123. Re:Hmmm... Stumbled upon this today by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this has happened in Japan yet:

    http://www.seoulselection.com/streetwise_read.html?cid=4036&area=home

    Past crimes cause teacher to be deported
    November 08, 2007

    "For the first time in Korea, an English teacher has been deported for a crime he committed before coming here, the Justice Ministry announced yesterday.
    An American whose name was not released was deported, the Justice Ministry said, after a previous conviction in Los Angeles of possessing and distributing child pornography was uncovered."

    and, from the same article:

    "Currently, 17,020 native English speakers are working as language teachers in Korea on E-2 visas, according to data from the ministry.
    Through August of this year, 100 teachers were caught on visa violations or felonies committed in Korea. Eighteen were deported, but 82 were allowed to remain here."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  124. Re:It's not that different for Mexicans going to U by therealgrumpydog · · Score: 1

    Personally I really could not give a shit...Orson Wells and Big Brother is here including facial recognition and CCTV. The UK is the most spied on Nation on Earth. My fingerprints were taken when I went to the USA last year and a retina scan. The USA forced Japan into doing this, besides the Japanese are quite amiable toward this as they are high profile with camera's around their necks. It is just more "big brother", Did you know terrorism would disappear if people were more friendly, Hollywood sponsors terrorist films to keep it in front of your mind.... not only that, The USA is just a bully. Nice justification's from America "Friendly Fire" is bollocks. The USA have done this because of North Korea and probably Bush's involvement with the CIA like his DAD and CIA dirty tricks. I would like to say I have some very nice friends in the USA. Therefore not making USA citizen's "outcasts" I apologise in advance. Please keep the truth! Kind Regards, Roo

  125. Disclaimer needed? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people are going to try this after reading your post?!?!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum