Homer [sorta flintstones theam music]: Welcome to krusty burger, The greatest food in history, All I want is a ribwitch, with a billion or more calories! (homer is dooling as he's at the krusty burger window)
Lisa [Slow sad, les miserables style]: But think of the poor animals, what have they done? bring about a saving grace, for your heart is nearly done! (zoom in on homer's heart all nasty)
Bart [rap style]: Chill miss sis, Don't you know the cow is wack, the best way to serve it is in a stack! (Bart munches on a 10 burger stack inbetween two rolls)
Marge: Now children, get along, and homer, put away the gunnnn. (Homer puts away the gun he was waving around to get a ribwitch)
Something else is that the LR location will be moving within the next 2.5 years, and most local telco's won't touch a short lease for this much bandwidth...
I would recommend you move before investing in such a fat pipe to be honest. You've survived for awhile with how it is, so why not just suck it up and deal with it until your where you can play far more in advanced. Maybe even get it to that when they move the pipe is already there and waiting.
My point is this: kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ bash foo The program was run kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ ls -l foo -rw-r--r-- 1 kormoc users 27 Feb 11 02:36 foo
and yes, as you can see, it works, but that's not what happens when you get a attachment, this is what would happen: kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $./foo bash:./foo: Permission denied kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ mv foo foo.sh kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $./foo.sh bash:./foo.sh: Permission denied
You see, you assume the user will take foo and pass it though bash, and yes, passing it though bash will cause it to run without the +x flag, but when you get a attachment from a email or somewhere else, and you double click on it, it doesn't go, hrm, this looks like a bash script, I'll just send it to bash and see's what happens. It will ask you what you want to do with the file, save it or open it with a program. if you then tell it to pass though the bash program, it's your fault, it's not linux.
second the lowlevel exec call infact does check, you are running BASH, not your script, and BASH is allowed to run, so what BASH does after it's run is not upto the exec flag to say, hrm, I don't know if they ment to pass a script to this program, so I guess I'll just lock them out, that would be horrible.
My point remains, you can't send a executable via email that the user runs without knowing they ran it...
so how does typing bash myscript.txt make it run automagicly? and second, you do not need to reset ownership, as long as you have read rights, you can run a script, not that it will always run correctly, but it will try.
The point is it's hard to email someone a shell script and have them run it without them knowing it's a script.
I don't know about you, but email doesn't perserve file execute primissions so even if you chmod +x it, email it to me, and I click on it, it still won't run until I save it, chmod +x it and then click it.
Thats odd... We have it right here the virus came from joe bob's cyber cafe about 30 miles from you from a machine the customer payed cash for and sent from a hotmail account s/he opened right there... Nah, couldn't be you...
sorry, my mistake, I was basing my comment on a post in ace's hardware: http://www.aceshardware.com/forum?read= 105064614 but I should have checked it out before I spouted, sorry.
I should bitchslap valve around a bit (just like the fuckin slashdot mods bitchslap assholes like me...) till they get off their asses and release a game.../me coughts TF2... Fuckin A, I bet it's gonna be christmas 2004 when e3 comes around...
Ok, enjoy, don't comment anymore cause it's not our job to tell you that it's fast enough ot good enough for you to switch... Oh... you just wanted to complain eh? Eh.... Whatever...
Slashdot Mirror
I read the headline and instantly thought of SCO arranging a hit on Linus...
nah... no brain, no pain :P
So, it seems that regardless of whether or not "SCO's [man]butter" was used to "bake the cake," (per your analogy)
I was fine with this up until I saw manbutter...
Christ! That's awful, and I'm not going to eat *ANY* of that cake!
Musical?
:P)
Something like:
Homer [sorta flintstones theam music]:
Welcome to krusty burger,
The greatest food in history,
All I want is a ribwitch,
with a billion or more calories!
(homer is dooling as he's at the krusty burger window)
Lisa [Slow sad, les miserables style]:
But think of the poor animals,
what have they done?
bring about a saving grace,
for your heart is nearly done!
(zoom in on homer's heart all nasty)
Bart [rap style]:
Chill miss sis,
Don't you know the cow is wack,
the best way to serve it is in a stack!
(Bart munches on a 10 burger stack inbetween two rolls)
Marge:
Now children, get along, and homer, put away the gunnnn.
(Homer puts away the gun he was waving around to get a ribwitch)
(horriable I know
I guess the current mods and users don't understand how to generate a proper charged pun without it being grounded...
actually I'd figure this would be great as static pages don't change that often...
Something else is that the LR location will be moving within the next 2.5 years, and most local telco's won't touch a short lease for this much bandwidth...
I would recommend you move before investing in such a fat pipe to be honest. You've survived for awhile with how it is, so why not just suck it up and deal with it until your where you can play far more in advanced. Maybe even get it to that when they move the pipe is already there and waiting.
My point is this:
./foo ./foo: Permission denied ./foo.sh ./foo.sh: Permission denied
kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ bash foo
The program was run
kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ ls -l foo
-rw-r--r-- 1 kormoc users 27 Feb 11 02:36 foo
and yes, as you can see, it works, but that's not what happens when you get a attachment, this is what would happen:
kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $
bash:
kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $ mv foo foo.sh
kormoc@rob-lnx tmp $
bash:
You see, you assume the user will take foo and pass it though bash, and yes, passing it though bash will cause it to run without the +x flag, but when you get a attachment from a email or somewhere else, and you double click on it, it doesn't go, hrm, this looks like a bash script, I'll just send it to bash and see's what happens. It will ask you what you want to do with the file, save it or open it with a program. if you then tell it to pass though the bash program, it's your fault, it's not linux.
second the lowlevel exec call infact does check, you are running BASH, not your script, and BASH is allowed to run, so what BASH does after it's run is not upto the exec flag to say, hrm, I don't know if they ment to pass a script to this program, so I guess I'll just lock them out, that would be horrible.
My point remains, you can't send a executable via email that the user runs without knowing they ran it...
so how does typing bash myscript.txt make it run automagicly? and second, you do not need to reset ownership, as long as you have read rights, you can run a script, not that it will always run correctly, but it will try.
The point is it's hard to email someone a shell script and have them run it without them knowing it's a script.
I don't know about you, but email doesn't perserve file execute primissions so even if you chmod +x it, email it to me, and I click on it, it still won't run until I save it, chmod +x it and then click it.
You see the difference?
Thats odd... We have it right here the virus came from joe bob's cyber cafe about 30 miles from you from a machine the customer payed cash for and sent from a hotmail account s/he opened right there... Nah, couldn't be you...
actually, a virus is more like a cracker, and a trojan is what is 'teaching' people to hanfle binary attachments with care...
sorry, my mistake, I was basing my comment on a post in ace's hardware:= 105064614
http://www.aceshardware.com/forum?read
but I should have checked it out before I spouted, sorry.
The P4EE has 2MB of L3 cache
That's level 2 cache to the rest of us...
It's up for a vote this month, so if enough people vote for it, it'll be offically supported.
best or most played? Cause there is a big difference in my book....
except they are going to rewrite most of that code, remember? The source that's out won't be close to what will be there...
No, I think they hired a few programmers...
Winex is a good solution to run many games, and you can bet that they will work as hard as they can to get hl2 working right away :)
Well to be honest, that's your own fault. ID never announced a release date so you should have waited as it wasn't them who lead you astray...
I should bitchslap valve around a bit (just like the fuckin slashdot mods bitchslap assholes like me...) till they get off their asses and release a game... /me coughts TF2...
Fuckin A, I bet it's gonna be christmas 2004 when e3 comes around...
err... that's four...
and I wonder how hard it will be to port to a mac, more games for macs? :)
Ok, enjoy, don't comment anymore cause it's not our job to tell you that it's fast enough ot good enough for you to switch... Oh... you just wanted to complain eh? Eh.... Whatever...
You voted for bush too eh?
oops, my mistake :)