Slashdot Mirror


Bandwidth in Little Rock, AR?

ioctl asks: "My company needs a 45Mb link from mid-town Little Rock, AR (University exit, I-630) to North Little Rock, AR (Wildwood exit, I-167). Our telco doesn't have any glass in the area, and wants about $800K over the next 5 years to build it out. We looked at another local provider who has the buildout already done, but their tech didn't show for the initial meeting (My boss: "He forgot it?!?!"). We've also looked into doing wireless via TCBY Tower (Proxim Tsunami or Aeras Networks Wavelink), but they are > $80K, plus rooftop space. Does bandwidth have to be this expensive? Are there any other possible solutions?"

71 comments

  1. Don't forget... by kinnell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A van full of hard drives. OK, it's probably not applicable, but you didn't mention your latency requirements ;-) Might look good in your report as evidence of "thinking outside the box", though.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is actually a very good point. Do you really NEED a 45mb connection? Why? What for?

      If after considering all the alternatives (VPN over DSL, mailing CDRs, etc) you decide you still need this fibre connection then... yes. Bandwidth is that expensive. Sorry!

    2. Re:Don't forget... by splattertrousers · · Score: 3, Funny
      I can see this headline in the Little Rock local newspaper:

      Van Flips, Spills 350 Hard Disks Full of Porn
      Cops Have A "Hard" Time Cleaning It Up

    3. Re:Don't forget... by ioctl · · Score: 3, Informative

      We thought about that, but it doesn't provide us with a hot-backup site. Latency would just be a little too high. =)

    4. Re:Don't forget... by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Was Bill Clinton in town...

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  2. Is it me or... by Komarosu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dunno, 80k for a wireless link with just the minimal of support fees sounds good, especially for 45mbps. Considering the facts that theres no telco fees involved with a wireless point-to-point solutions (unless i'm being extremely dumb).

    --

    "What do you mean you have no ice? Do you expect me to drink this coffee hot?" - Random Customer, Clerks
    1. Re:Is it me or... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Dunno, 80k for a wireless link with just the minimal of support fees sounds good, especially for 45mbps. Considering the facts that theres no telco fees involved with a wireless point-to-point solutions (unless i'm being extremely dumb).

      No kidding. How big is this company if they can't afford an $80k investment in hardware? I'd snap that up at the drop of a hat since you'll have no per-month fees to pay to a telco. Obviously they're big enough to justify 45Mbps worth of bandwidth so I'd think $80k up front would be a drop in the hat.

    2. Re:Is it me or... by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if US$ 80K seems stiff, maybe you can sell off chunks of your BW to other business to help make the mortgage payment on it.

      With the prime lending rate at 4%, that $80K is a little under $270/month, probably a lot less than what you're paying for space and other utilities already.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    3. Re:Is it me or... by ioctl · · Score: 1

      If I were making the decision myself, and could just sign the check, we'd have done this already. Unfortunatly, the 2004 IT budget has already been finalized, and the 80K just isn't there (we run a really lean IT shop).

      Maybe we'll just have to wait until 2005 to do this, or go with wire-line service...

    4. Re:Is it me or... by Froggie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $80k /per annum/ is in the right ballpark for renting the fibre you need, so I don't see why $80k fro equipment, plus minimal rent, should be too expensive. And companies, like people, can get loans.

  3. um... take another meeting with that local firm? by Artifex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, call the company, ask to talk to the president of the company, explain to them that his tech almost cost him a major deal, and asks if he still wants one.

    Oh, and if you get on good terms with that company, let them know there's at least one network engineer laid off from an international Tier 1 provider living in Dallas, Texas, who talked you into giving him another chance and would looove to move in and replace that tech :)

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  4. Do you really need 45Mbps? by Keyoke · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not familiar with the area, but you can MUX a handful of Ts together I suppose. If your still in the 0-mile area of a provider, that might not be too horribly expensive. I don't know what Ts cost out there tho. If you don't need more'n about 10Mbps, this might work. I think the most I've ever seen MUX'd is 8 Ts.

    1. Re:Do you really need 45Mbps? by Dios · · Score: 1


      Hmmm.

      I know there are a lot of Ts going into the Plaza west building not very far from there so this should be a very possible solution.

    2. Re:Do you really need 45Mbps? by ioctl · · Score: 1

      We looked at that, but we really need more bandwidth than Mux'd T-1's can give us for a decent price.

  5. Uhm... by pi_rules · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm no expert, but DS3 lines (capable of up to 45Mbps) run over copper just fine. You're probably better off if you can get fibre, but copper will do in a pinch.

    1. Re:Uhm... by Doco · · Score: 5, Informative

      DS3 does run over copper - but it can't over twisted pair. It is generally run using coax cable, and not exactly the cable-tv type of coax either. The equipment is set up for a 75ohm impedance, and expects repeaters on a regular basis. If the cable isn't already there - you might as well run fiber as it will be cheaper because of fewer repeaters and give you more bandwidth.

    2. Re:Uhm... by Quill_28 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See now that's a useful response.

      No flaming or calling the original poster stupid. Gives a nice precise techinal answer without inflating himself.

      Well done.

  6. well by Kraken137 · · Score: 4, Informative

    my company just recently switched from an OC-12 to a pair of gigabit fiber connections between our Conway and Little Rock offices... no idea how much we pay per month for it, but SBC *was* able to do it.

    1. Re:well by EasyRhino · · Score: 1

      You must work for the same company that I work for. Not too many businesses in Central Arkansas need that fat of a pipe between Conway and Little Rock. I'm glad to know there are other Slashdotters working here.

    2. Re:well by ioctl · · Score: 1

      Acxiom?

    3. Re:well by UuCon · · Score: 1

      you would be suprised

  7. Second that by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The story submitter should call the local firm back. Don't get me wrong, I realize that the tech left a bad impression (i.e. is bad service going to dog them through their dealings with the company?), and the folks probably feel snubbed. However, as someone else pointed out, this is not a multimillion dollar deal. It's bad, but people also do occasionally forget things. Heck, I've made a couple of mistakes and oversights in my life, and I've been glad when people give me a chance to make good on it. Maybe the guy's wife just broke up with him, maybe some other company kept having emergencies that he had to handle and got overwhelmed, forgetting about the appointment. Maybe his PDA that he used to keep appointments with was stolen and he's been trying to adapt to using pen-and-paper. Who knows?

    Giving folks a chance to make one mistake, unless you're in a situation where a particular mistake absolutely cannot happen is not a bad idea. It can't hurt (aside from a bit of the submitter's time) to bring the people in. He can always decide not to go with them. Given the amount of money on the line, it seems like worthwhile being gracious may be worthwhile.

    Also, as others have pointed out, have you considered all possibilities? Do you really need a 45Mbps link? Can you get away with mirroring some fileservers on each side, or something along those lines? We don't really have any idea of what you're doing.

    Just a thought -- It might also be worthwhile to hire a local network engineering consultant to give his advice as to what's best to do. He might know of worthwhile things that other local companies have done.

    You might consider working a deal with any other businesses interested in doing the same thing and maybe even the city. If there are other businesses that desperately need network connectivity or could reduce their ISP fees by joining into such a thing, perhaps the people asking $800K could be made to give a better deal, or at least split costs.

    If you decide to do rooftop links, remember that the failure conditions are different from lines. Depending upon the sort of system you decide upon, bad weather can negatively impact your link.

    [Sigh] There's just so little information that it's hard to give more than very basic guesses as to what you want to do.

    1. Re:Second that by ioctl · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK, my bad...

      We are trying to do multiple things:
      - AD Replication (not much bandwidth)
      - SQL Replication (average usage isn't much, but overnight processes generate multiple gigs of changes, and have to be done before 5am)
      - File Replication (Big bandwidth; scanned documents & the like)
      - Line-of-business Apps (Big SQL bandwidth; they aren't very efficient, but we didn't write them, so... =P )
      - VOIP for 24 lines (1.5Mb or so max)

      We also need to be able to grow pretty significantly over the next few years.

      Something else is that the LR location will be moving within the next 2.5 years, and most local telco's won't touch a short lease for this much bandwidth...

    2. Re:Second that by thelasttemptation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something else is that the LR location will be moving within the next 2.5 years, and most local telco's won't touch a short lease for this much bandwidth...

      I would recommend you move before investing in such a fat pipe to be honest. You've survived for awhile with how it is, so why not just suck it up and deal with it until your where you can play far more in advanced. Maybe even get it to that when they move the pipe is already there and waiting.

    3. Re:Second that by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, well, let's see. If you're going to change this anyway in a maximum of 2.5 years, stopgap solutions should work. I'm a software guy, so the approaches that I'd think of try and work around needing the link in the first place:

      * I'm not familiar with AD usage, but perhaps you could get away with whatever lower-bandwidth connectivity *is* available (business DSL?) at both locations.

      * VoIP -- May be able to get away with a dedicated business DSL line again. More a question for telco folks. Issuing cell phones may be an answer (and these have benefits of their own).

      * SQL replication/File replication -- if there's any way to simply dump changes to a hard drive, this may be a good time to consider the van-full-of-CDs approach that someone suggested (or more likely, a USB 2 hard drive). Can you afford to have someone drive a hard drive across town each night for a maximum of 30 months? This has the added benefit of saving you on FedEx or whatever physical transport mechanism you use. With file replication, you may also consider use of a more advanced distributed filesystem like Coda that can lazily propagate data and use distributed servers.

      * Line-of-business Apps: Not sure. Depends on what you can get away with. If you can't just mirror a DB -- one side really does do writes that the other side may need to read right away -- and you really do have serious read and write bandwidth usage on each side, then you may be stuck WRT a high-speed link.

      You may need to squeeze your growth estimates, if you're going to move in the next 2.5 years, especially if it's more likely to happen in six months. You might also consider the networking issue as a factor in accelerating any move in progress.

    4. Re:Second that by ioctl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, that worked out a lot better than I had anticipated... We called the local guys back, and they have now quoted us about $4650/Month for 100 Mbit/s fiber, and minimal buildout. This is probably just as well, because the rooftop space on TCBY tower would be about $1000/Month (found that out this morning). Anyway, thanks!

  8. Downlink or Uplink or both ? by moro_666 · · Score: 0

    you could estabilish such a link by getting your own satellite, it can't be used for both or uplinks though,
    but still ... for a downlink it would be satisfying.

    [our whole town has a max of 20mb line i think]
    [100 000 residents ... not much, but seems to be]
    [satisfying it seems]
    [what r u people doing there, downloading the "internet"?]

    --

    I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  9. Re:um... take another meeting with that local firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The question is why they are talking to a "tech" to begin with. Call the Sales Department -- those guys are on commission and won't forget to show up.

  10. consider moving the mountain to mohammed by cryptozoologist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    might it cost less than $80k to move the company to where the bandwidth you desire is available?

    1. Re:consider moving the mountain to mohammed by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear its cost-effective moving the company to India.

      At least the parts requiring that much bandwidth.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:consider moving the mountain to mohammed by ioctl · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It would cost us many times that to move (probably $500K+ for NLR, and > $4M for LR).

  11. Move by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Move whatever operations that require 45MBps to an area where high speed fiber is available.

    Paying outrageous fees or investing lots of money into oddball technology is retarded these days. You don't have to look hard to find industrial or commercial areas where high-speed telco access has already been installed by a local government or development authority, or where the state government will give you tax breaks or grants to install such equipment.

    Universities operate tech parks as well, here's an example of a successful one as well:
    http://www.rpitechpark.com/aboutpark.php

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Move by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 1

      Paying outrageous fees or investing lots of money into oddball technology is retarded these days. You don't have to look hard to find industrial or commercial areas where high-speed telco access has already been installed by a local government or development authority, or where the state government will give you tax breaks or grants to install such equipment.

      Exactly, the city my business is located in, Burbank, CA, laid down something like 2,000 fibre optic lines throughout the commercial areas of the city for businesses to lease. The mayor talked about it quite a bit during her "Mayor on the street" segment on local channel 6. The grid seemed pretty impressive.

      Of course, we're probably a special case. They call Burbank "Media City" because we're home to Disney, Warner Bros, DIC, and NBC.

    2. Re:Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wacky. I used to work for one of the companies that now occupys that park.

      Actually, I worked for a company that bought one of the companies occupying the park.

      How random.

  12. Talk to the City and County by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You City and County planers might know of an area in town that would be better suited to your needs.
    You local Economic Development Commision might also be willing to help out. Tell them you are looking to move out of the Town, County, and maybe State. They might have grants and Tax incentives to help you.
    Anything doing with computers is still considered high tech and usually clean. Planners love software development firms. Ask them for help to keep you there. That is what they get paid to do.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  13. $80K for wireless? by N4m0r · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's ridiculous! Haven't you ever heard of the Cantenna? Just stick a couple of those on your roof and you are good to go!. ;-)

    1. Re:$80K for wireless? by ioctl · · Score: 1

      That's what I originally thought of, but my boss (the CIO) won't do that... "You want me to bet our disaster recovery on *what*?". He's probably right, too.

  14. Read RFC 1149.... by callermann · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pigeons...lots of pigeons...

  15. Re:What's Clinton using these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why they need the 45mb connection.

  16. Quoting Buzz Lightyear: by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 3, Funny
    My company needs a 45Mb link from mid-town Little Rock, AR to North Little Rock, AR
    You're a sad, strange, little man, and you have my pity.
    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  17. Re:um... take another meeting with that local firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    re your sig: you do know that you don't get mod points if you post too often, right?

  18. What about sattelite??? by JamesP · · Score: 0

    It may be NOT that expensive. And you cut the middle man...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  19. Time Warner by austad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have you checked into Time Warner?

    They have Metro Area ethernet in a lot of major cities, and pricing is damn good. Here in Minneapolis, I can do gigabit Fibre Channel between offices. Now that's just damn cool. Not sure about little rock, but it may be worth looking into. Time Warner Telecom has the benefit of being able to use Time Warner Cable's right-of-way. Which means that when they run fiber, they don't have to get permits and go through as much hassle because in the early 80's cable companies were granted huge rights which allowed them to pretty much run cable wherever they pleased without having to get permits. And, if your location makes business sense to TW, they will finance the cost of the install (like if there are other large potential customers in your building).

    Although, for the recurring monthly cost of a link like this, after 10 to 12 months, you could have just paid for that wireless solution you were looking at. Keep in mind 802.15.3 wireless is coming out soon too, which will drop costs dramatically.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:Time Warner by ioctl · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are in my area, but I'll look in more detail later.

      802.15.3 won't work for us, because of the distance limitation. We have a minimum of 6.7 miles to cover in the longest hop.

  20. Cogent by Brett333 · · Score: 2, Informative

    My company just went with a new isp that apears to also be in Kansas City (dont know if they are in your area or not).

    www.cogentco.com

    100Mb for $1000/month
    Full Fiber Network

    1. Re:Cogent by tomblackwell · · Score: 2, Informative

      cogent has an abysmal reputation. Many hosting companies, will bill their bandwidth as "Non-Cogent", which is considered a valuable feature.

    2. Re:Cogent by smatthew · · Score: 1

      The university I work for has a Gigabit connection to the internet through Cogent Communications. $10,000 a month. They had some initial problems with the connection, but it has been rock solid ever since that first month. Here's a link to our Network Status page.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
  21. Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by NuvoxEngineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.nuvox.com is a CLEC that has a presnece in Little Rock. We have customers in the Little Rock area and have solutions available to customers such as yourself. We have different options available to you regarding this solution and would be happy to speak with you regarding this. I am in Little Rock and I am available for a discussion with you. Shoot me an email to discuss. gphillips@nuvox.com.

  22. Why? (and don't forget co-lo) by Zapman · · Score: 1

    Why on earth do you think you need that much bandwidth? Where is the bandwidth going? Most smallish companies (the ones that balk at $800k) don't need more than a couple T1's.

    If you REALLY need that kind of bandwidth, take a long look at co-lo'ing your servers somewhere. You can get the bandwidth relativly cheeply, and house all the high bandwidth stuff at the co-lo. Then you just remotely manage it. Have some way to do send large batches of data to the colo (say large capacity tape drive, or maybe some ATA drive array) and you're done.

    --
    Zapman
  23. Damn -- talk about diversified! by Deagol · · Score: 1
    We've also looked into doing wireless via TCBY Tower ...

    I guess the frozen yogurt market has some stiff competition these days, eh?

  24. $800K?! by NickDngr · · Score: 1

    For $800k, it might just be cheaper to move your operation across town.

    --
    Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
  25. Relocate by non-poster · · Score: 1

    Move 45 miles...

  26. Re:Why? (and don't forget co-lo) by toast0 · · Score: 1

    They want that bandwidth between their two sites... so they can have a remote hot backup.

  27. Re: Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by NuvoxEngineer · · Score: 1

    Give me a break man, I mispelled one word.

  28. Re: Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by LWATCDR · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Man when did english dweebs start hitting slashdot? And what does spelling have to do with keeping a network up and running?
    Good grief ACs if you are not worth you claiming then they are not worth reading.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  29. Re: Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good lord, man. He was trolling. Why waste your time to give some fifteen-year-old his jollies?

  30. Another possibility by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the *only* high-bandwidth needs are for hot-backup, you may be able to, use colo or perhaps, cut a deal with another company's offices (one that could be reached more cheaply with high bandwidth) that also wants to run off-site hot-backup systems -- you supply hot-backup systems for them, they supply some for you. I don't know whether this is standard business practice.

  31. Re: Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by meme_police · · Score: 1

    To top it off it appears to just be a typo rather than a blatant mispelling.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  32. do your own work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why exactly are the readers of slashdot doing your consulting and due-diligence work for you?

    quit reading slashdot and get back to work!

  33. Hire a network engineer by ted_nugent · · Score: 1

    From the little bit you've told us, I am guessing that you're throwing bandwidth at your issues and haven't put any effort into the bigger issue of optimizing your networks.

    The first thing I would do is look into centralizing your applications and change the delivery methods. Why have these piggy SQL server calls traversing the network? If you can't get the frontend converted from SQL native to a web-based system, then at least consider going to terminal services for that app.

    --

    Free the West Memphis Three!

  34. unused municipal "Dark fiber" by TeddyR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you checked to see if there is any unused municipal dark fiber?

    In some areas there may be fiber owned by the city/state/county that is not being used.

    It might be possible to get the rights to some of that fiber if your company has any relationship with the local govt... If not, a good alternative might be to dedicate a vlan and ports on your switch to have for example a library located at each location interconnected. You essentially would be providing the backbone hardware for the library / local city office...

    --

    --
    Time is on my side
  35. Holy Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, yes ds3's go over copper but your fogetting 1 thing (400 feet) thats it. You bring in a ds3 either over an Async box or Transport System (sonet).

    As for mux'ng ds1's into 1 ds3, the break even point is approx 4 ds1's.

    PS: there is a differnce between ds1 and t1.
    t1 = physical interface specs
    ds1 = signaling speed

    Now stop the abuse of the telecom vocabulary.

    hf--
    04.ds6.44

    Why doesnt someone break that down.

  36. Re: Nuvox can help you out. Nuvox is a CLEC in LR by monkeyfinger · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't feed the trolls.
    :-)

  37. Consider agregating it by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    An alternative might be to aggregate the required bandwidth using available connectivity (DSL, business cable internet, T1, lower-speed point-to-point links). Depending on local costs, this may not be cost prohibitive.

    As a side benefit, since your connectivity will be diverse, individual carrier and facility outages will only degrade your connection, not sever it.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  38. This *is* Arkansas, ya know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You actually expect the City of LR to own *any* fiber??? They're still relying on mostly dialup connections.

    1. Re:This *is* Arkansas, ya know. by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      It amazing what hidden treasures some "little" cities may have.

      I know from personal experiance working with such places where they have upgraded the infrastructure during the .com boom.

      For example... One city I know of required the cable company to place alot of fiber when they changed cable company providers {they were going to have to dig up the streets anyway so it was easier to do it once}. The fiber is owned by the city. They HAVE used a minute amount of it to connect the main library w/ city hall. There is still ALOT of unused fiber ready for use. Their only restriction is that the fiber must be used "to better the city and the living conditions of its citizens"....

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
    2. Re:This *is* Arkansas, ya know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to better the city and the living conditions of its citizens

      well... at least Canyon and Amarillo tried to better themselves. Too bad the DA was so inept.

  39. Proxim "QuickBridge" much cheaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the network admin for a city govt in Texas, we're using the Proxim Tsunami "QuickBridge" 5.8GHz wireless gear for several links and they work rock-solid. Only a few thousand $ per each pair of transceivers. The biggest expense would be getting towers so you'd have line-of-sight. We were able to simply use bujilding rooftops for most sites since our part of Texas is flat as a pancake and line-of-sight is generally not a problem, but at one site we did have to install an 80-foot tall tower.

    QuickBridge will get you from 18Mbps to 100Mbps depending on how much you want to spend.

  40. A recommendation... by mikep.maine · · Score: 1

    If all you need is for remote backup and basic data exchange, you should split up the problem. For backup, have local backup that can then perform remote backup during the day. You get exceptional speed for local backup, then more time for the remote backup. A couple of T1's MUXed together should work.

    --
    Mike www.sharecube.com