3) Nokia had their own new system, MeeGo, under development at the time. Nokia users were hyped for it. App devs and phone carriers had sunk sweat and money preparing for it. Everyone who actually used it says it was excellent. So when that was killed in favor of WP, simply because the new CEO was a Microsoft puppet, you have tons of people - a very vocal fanbase and several big companies - furious and ready to jump ship to anything but WP.
4) Like that hadn't angered carriers enough, Microsoft bought Skype, which was seen as trying to steal their bread and butter. You just can't win in this market without carrier support.
5) WP was born osborned. Even before the first Lumia devices came out, it was known they would not be upgradable to the next version of WP, so everyone avoided them in a critical moment.
I've actually seen one or two in the wild, here in Brazil. For a brief moment WP was heavily discounted and sold well. But of course, "carriers dumping old stock that no one wanted at full price" is not a sustainable business model.
The problem of the Start menu is a lack of automatic application categorization. Microsoft should have imposed this sort of thing upon all devs, all the way back in '95. Is it too late to fix Windows now?
The way they've been neglecting the Mac for years, you'd expect all their pro users to have jumped ship. But then again, the alternatives are all flawed.
Then just get Seamonkey.
32-bit programs, maybe. Apple wants to move fully to 64-bit.
I have some complements to that:
3) Nokia had their own new system, MeeGo, under development at the time. Nokia users were hyped for it. App devs and phone carriers had sunk sweat and money preparing for it. Everyone who actually used it says it was excellent. So when that was killed in favor of WP, simply because the new CEO was a Microsoft puppet, you have tons of people - a very vocal fanbase and several big companies - furious and ready to jump ship to anything but WP.
4) Like that hadn't angered carriers enough, Microsoft bought Skype, which was seen as trying to steal their bread and butter. You just can't win in this market without carrier support.
5) WP was born osborned. Even before the first Lumia devices came out, it was known they would not be upgradable to the next version of WP, so everyone avoided them in a critical moment.
Tablet certainly did exist since the early 90s. Look into IBM's ThinkPad 700T, AT&T's EO, and Apple's Newton.
"We have met the enemy and he is us." - Walt Kelly
Okay, but check this comparison of Nokia's best camera phone ever versus a professional camera. Can you guess which one wins?
Yes, that can replace a point-and-shoot very well. But when you want serious quality, you need a serious camera, not a phone.
Nokia was a walking corpse when MS bought them
Because their Microsoft-planted CEO Stephen Elop killed it from the inside. Nokia was doing pretty well before the disastrous move to Windows Phone.
If you want the best photos, you should get an actual camera, not a phone.
I've actually seen one or two in the wild, here in Brazil. For a brief moment WP was heavily discounted and sold well. But of course, "carriers dumping old stock that no one wanted at full price" is not a sustainable business model.
The problem of the Start menu is a lack of automatic application categorization. Microsoft should have imposed this sort of thing upon all devs, all the way back in '95. Is it too late to fix Windows now?
As someone who was hyped for MeeGo back then, the absolute commercial failure of Windows Phone has a bittersweet taste of justice.
Yes, I know Colorsync was a big deal back then, but Windows includes an equivalent solution now, right?
The way they've been neglecting the Mac for years, you'd expect all their pro users to have jumped ship. But then again, the alternatives are all flawed.
Redundant news - could have easily said "new iPad no harder to repair than previous models."
But that wouldn't be clickbaity enough.
It seems she shot her boyfriend. Fun fact: women commit more domestic violence against men than the other way around.
Windows 7 was at least beta quality. But 10 was a regression.
Looking at market share, any mobile system that is not Android or iOS counts as obscure.
A widely misunderstood quote. Olsen was talking about home automation -- a computer controlling the home.
Sailfish OS and Tizen (rather obscure, I know) are also mobile systems based on Linux.
Framerate-Accelerating General Graphics Operations Technology.
Going from dark chocolate to sweet chocolate is a downgrade.
Look, I'll be the first one to say that Windows Update in Win10 is basically indistinguishable from malware at this point.
At this point? People were joking that Windows is like malware back in the mid-1990s.
As long as it takes you to install Linux, or at least Windows 7.
App is short for application.