Well this comment shows the problem right away. This is actually a mass independent problem, as gravity is always accelerating things (on Earth) at ~9.81 m/s^2. The problem is more what the drag on the bus is over the course of the flight. However, since I am not in the mood to calculate Reynolds numbers for flying busses, I will assume inviscid air.
Problem statement: A point particle moving at 70 MPH at some angle must cross a 50 foot gap, and be at the same height when it reaches the other side.
Given:
v0 = 70 mph// Initial speed
x = 50 feet// Distance to travel horizontially
x = v0*t*cos(theta)
y = v0*sin(theta)*t - g*t^2
Solve for t
t = x/(v0*cos(theta))
Substitude into y equation
y = x*v0/v0*sin(theta)/cos(theta) - g*x^2/v0^2/cos(theta)^2
Set y = 0 and solve
x*sin(theta)/cos(theta) = g*x^2/v0^2/cos(theta)^2
sin(theta)*cos(theta) = g*x/v0^2
g*x/v0^2 = 9.81*15.24/(31.2928)^2 = 0.15267
sin(theta)*cos(theta) = 0.15267 can be solve graphically. The first valid solution is 8.89 degrees.
So yes, a bus (with no friction) can cross a 50 feet gap, if the ramp was at an incline greater than 8.89 degrees.
Both the MSV++ and glibc++ implimentations of the C++ Standard libraries have include and/or . It is not a compiler issue no matter how you slice it. It is a header/library problem.
You are partially correct, but ultimatelly wrong. endl is not defined in iostream. However, iostream must include istream and ostream because of inheritance paths. std::endl is defined in ostream. So include-ing iostream is always sufficent to get std::endl.
You are wrong, as std::cout is defined in the header "iostream". See here. cout is an extern in the namespace std. By include-ing iostream, I have defined cout.
Classic (maple) here. Now that I look carefully, those who say that it moves the cursor is correct. I wonder why they did it correct for 1-row, but not extended the feature to n-row, because it makes sense.
Sure enough, you are right. Sorry bout that, human error strikes again (that and very bad readung comprehensin). Oh and bad spelling never hurts either.
You pay to go to class, not to get a good grade. End of story. Example: You pay to go to a movie. During the movie you fall asleep, snore loudly, and are removed from the theater. Your fault or the theaters?
3+ years > 3 months:) (That is ignoring power outages. We picked up a Tivo when they first came out. We have only need to reboot it once, in about the second year we owned it. Oh and the hdd upgrade I did I had to shut it down.)
I run OS X inside pearpc, does that make my winblows machine a Mac?(BTW they are all really PC(personal computers), but we make a division between the x86 and PPC worlds by calling one side PCs and the other Macs, which is quite dumb. anyways:)
Isn't it funny that point of copyright is too promote creative works (such as high tech), but this law protects copyright by creating a legal minefield for hightech devices and software typically covered by the term "creative works". This law clearly shows that congress is NOT deriving their powers from the constitution, for example where does it say they can deter "creative works", oh wait....(sorry for the over used cliche, but it works so well)
Well thats fine, I doubt anyone can dispute global warming (I never did). What I doubt is human involvement in any of it. Would anyone like to look at sun output charts over the past few year, rather informing (can't find data chart, but it has been increasing in the past few years). My only wish is that people would consider that global warming can exist without human involvement.
look at the real data. storagereview.com has extensive data on most hdds out there today. the top top is almost always SCSI. is it more expensive sure. but which has the most performance dont even blink. Its SCSI(expect for 2 tests).
as long as you keep netBIOS ports sealed, and your web services machines isolated, and you machince update, you are probably stopping most of the common problem with network security. is it perfect, no. but for your size company how can you expect that.
Slashdot Mirror
Well this comment shows the problem right away. This is actually a mass independent problem, as gravity is always accelerating things (on Earth) at ~9.81 m/s^2. The problem is more what the drag on the bus is over the course of the flight. However, since I am not in the mood to calculate Reynolds numbers for flying busses, I will assume inviscid air.
// Initial speed // Distance to travel horizontially
Problem statement: A point particle moving at 70 MPH at some angle must cross a 50 foot gap, and be at the same height when it reaches the other side.
Given:
v0 = 70 mph
x = 50 feet
Assumption: Force-free motion
Constant gravity ( g = 9.81 m/s^2 )
Solution:
v0 = 70 mph = 31.2928 m/s
x = 50 feet = 15.24 m
t = Time of flight
theta = Angle from horizon
x = v0*t*cos(theta)
y = v0*sin(theta)*t - g*t^2
Solve for t t = x/(v0*cos(theta))
Substitude into y equation
y = x*v0/v0*sin(theta)/cos(theta) - g*x^2/v0^2/cos(theta)^2
Set y = 0 and solve
x*sin(theta)/cos(theta) = g*x^2/v0^2/cos(theta)^2
sin(theta)*cos(theta) = g*x/v0^2
g*x/v0^2 = 9.81*15.24/(31.2928)^2 = 0.15267
sin(theta)*cos(theta) = 0.15267 can be solve graphically. The first valid solution is 8.89 degrees.
So yes, a bus (with no friction) can cross a 50 feet gap, if the ramp was at an incline greater than 8.89 degrees.
Yay.
Both the MSV++ and glibc++ implimentations of the C++ Standard libraries have include and/or . It is not a compiler issue no matter how you slice it. It is a header/library problem.
You are partially correct, but ultimatelly wrong. endl is not defined in iostream. However, iostream must include istream and ostream because of inheritance paths. std::endl is defined in ostream. So include-ing iostream is always sufficent to get std::endl.
You are wrong, as std::cout is defined in the header "iostream". See here. cout is an extern in the namespace std. By include-ing iostream, I have defined cout.
Still wrong:
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello World" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Classic (maple) here. Now that I look carefully, those who say that it moves the cursor is correct. I wonder why they did it correct for 1-row, but not extended the feature to n-row, because it makes sense.
Actually, I just tested it, and throwing the mouse to the lower-left and clicking does infact bring up the Start menu.
The term would be most accurately a "Simple Majority" For other majorities see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority
3. Sell content
Sure enough, you are right. Sorry bout that, human error strikes again (that and very bad readung comprehensin). Oh and bad spelling never hurts either.
You pay to go to class, not to get a good grade. End of story. Example: You pay to go to a movie. During the movie you fall asleep, snore loudly, and are removed from the theater. Your fault or the theaters?
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxp pro/sp2preview.mspx
you where saying?
3+ years > 3 months :) (That is ignoring power outages. We picked up a Tivo when they first came out. We have only need to reboot it once, in about the second year we owned it. Oh and the hdd upgrade I did I had to shut it down.)
I run OS X inside pearpc, does that make my winblows machine a Mac?(BTW they are all really PC(personal computers), but we make a division between the x86 and PPC worlds by calling one side PCs and the other Macs, which is quite dumb. anyways:)
On the other hand search for particular *nix functions, and this engine out-performs google by leaps and bounds. Try it.
Isn't it funny that point of copyright is too promote creative works (such as high tech), but this law protects copyright by creating a legal minefield for hightech devices and software typically covered by the term "creative works". This law clearly shows that congress is NOT deriving their powers from the constitution, for example where does it say they can deter "creative works", oh wait....(sorry for the over used cliche, but it works so well)
Well thats fine, I doubt anyone can dispute global warming (I never did). What I doubt is human involvement in any of it. Would anyone like to look at sun output charts over the past few year, rather informing (can't find data chart, but it has been increasing in the past few years). My only wish is that people would consider that global warming can exist without human involvement.
look at the real data. storagereview.com has extensive data on most hdds out there today. the top top is almost always SCSI. is it more expensive sure. but which has the most performance dont even blink. Its SCSI(expect for 2 tests).
as long as you keep netBIOS ports sealed, and your web services machines isolated, and you machince update, you are probably stopping most of the common problem with network security. is it perfect, no. but for your size company how can you expect that.