also, could you ever REALLY trust someone who believes they will remain eligible to spend eternity in paradise as long as he feels bad about his sins sometime before death.
According to Christian mythology Hitler could go to heaven if he repented an hour before death, but a non-Christian philanthropist who dedicates his life to the bettering of human society will burn in hell forever.
actually they were ROM chips, not RAM. there was small amounts of battery backed up RAM to store save files and sometimes extra chips for the system to use such as the SuperFX chip.
The problem is that if people could get away with buying a repeater instead of a NAT/Firewall/Switch and save $25 they would. The current "one IP one Account" type of service with most broadband services provide now requires people with a home network to buy an effective firewall.
being able to drop certain packets is not the same as being totally unable to deliver certain packets without specific instructions from the user how to do so. the difference between tricking a router into thinking your malicious packet is actually good and doing the same thing, plus sending that packet to a machine that isn't routable from the internet is quite a large difference.
in particular one pretty much requires that you be able to execute malicious code on the router while the other only requires that you make bad packets look legit.
i'm not familiar with how IPSec works, but if a NAT router breaks it, it's already broken as any compromised router between you and your destination could do the same thing.
a better software design would have been to simply use int days_since_epoch for your day, then have some nice display formatting code whenever meatware needs to interpret a date, that way any problems converting logical dates into meatspace-compliant dates would only confuse the people rather than crash(no pun intended) anything important
I would suggest offering them the information regardless of whether they want to pay you anything, and offering your services as a consultant if they want your help fixing the issue.
doesn't matter WHO is restricting the distribution. under the GPL if something you wish to distribute is restricted by patents, you may not distribute it at all.
not complying is not resisting arrest, you do not have to help the police arrest you. you simply cannot fight back.
you attack my incorrect word usage without addressing the points i raise.
congratualtions, you have won at the internet.
also, could you ever REALLY trust someone who believes they will remain eligible to spend eternity in paradise as long as he feels bad about his sins sometime before death.
According to Christian mythology Hitler could go to heaven if he repented an hour before death, but a non-Christian philanthropist who dedicates his life to the bettering of human society will burn in hell forever.
you just called the replicating rings a terrorist act..........
i'm against cisco because they went a year knowing about that vulnerability AND used legal threats to go after whistle blowers.
cisco IOS is proprietary and doesn't have a great track record with security
a huge, goatse-like streatch of logic
4 units does not a shipment make.
thanks for the name, but we're already calling it the Piss3
--The Sony Sucks club
actually they were ROM chips, not RAM. there was small amounts of battery backed up RAM to store save files and sometimes extra chips for the system to use such as the SuperFX chip.
so nobody should do research that goes against your worldview? you sound like a republican talking about global warming.
I meant execute malicious code on the NAT router in order to peek inside the LAN.
The problem is that if people could get away with buying a repeater instead of a NAT/Firewall/Switch and save $25 they would. The current "one IP one Account" type of service with most broadband services provide now requires people with a home network to buy an effective firewall.
right now at least two front page stories are tagged "teabagging"
being able to drop certain packets is not the same as being totally unable to deliver certain packets without specific instructions from the user how to do so. the difference between tricking a router into thinking your malicious packet is actually good and doing the same thing, plus sending that packet to a machine that isn't routable from the internet is quite a large difference.
in particular one pretty much requires that you be able to execute malicious code on the router while the other only requires that you make bad packets look legit.
i'm not familiar with how IPSec works, but if a NAT router breaks it, it's already broken as any compromised router between you and your destination could do the same thing.
NAT is the single most important advancement in network security for home users.
a better software design would have been to simply use int days_since_epoch for your day, then have some nice display formatting code whenever meatware needs to interpret a date, that way any problems converting logical dates into meatspace-compliant dates would only confuse the people rather than crash(no pun intended) anything important
it also helps head off a major threadjack where someonenotices the name and everyone argues back and forth over whether or not they are related
I would suggest offering them the information regardless of whether they want to pay you anything, and offering your services as a consultant if they want your help fixing the issue.
doesn't matter WHO is restricting the distribution. under the GPL if something you wish to distribute is restricted by patents, you may not distribute it at all.
they don't mind what you did. they hate when companies make then reverse charges regularly as a part of their business.
that would be fun to watch, IIRC the fine for willfully jamming is $40,000/day
easier than porting from windows to linux.
yes, but it leaves a pile of paper ballots which can be audited and then used to throw the F*ckers out of office and into PMITA Prison after the fact.