umm, the N64 was a technically superior product in just about every way except for media capacity, but creative use of the rest of it allowed games to have almost as much video content by rendering much more in real time than the PSX could ever hope to.
because of course a tracking system would never be used for evil purposes, the government would never start mining data for "suspicious" behavior under the shroud of Terrorism.
if by history you mean one system yes, and the Nintendo 64 was a good system, the games were fun, the graphics were amazing at the time. one questionably based argument about one system does not mean they have a "history" of screwing things up.
more importantly, something like white balance information does not pass the "marginally creative" test for copyrightability, the data is purely functional for the purpose of properly rendering a photograph taken by the user of the camera.
The GPL was not "tested in court" the lawsuit was a contract dispute between SCO and IBM. Though i think it may have resulted in a few more PHB's hearing about linux and maybe being curious how it could save money to switch.
see, the problem with doing all that is that Orphans generally don't get pissed and riot, most of the entertainment in prisons isn't there so the inmates have a good time, but rather so they have something to do other than think up creative ways to kill the guards.
orphans are prohibited from asking someone to put things on their website? I couldn't care less about giving criminals with internet access. my issue would be with the government going after inmate websites operated by other people for them.
I have no problem with banning criminals from accessing the internet, however if the government tries to prevent them from mailing out material to put on their web site (so long as it is not illegal material) would be an egregious violation of civil rights
Slashdot Mirror
umm, the N64 was a technically superior product in just about every way except for media capacity, but creative use of the rest of it allowed games to have almost as much video content by rendering much more in real time than the PSX could ever hope to.
because of course a tracking system would never be used for evil purposes, the government would never start mining data for "suspicious" behavior under the shroud of Terrorism.
i was referring to Yeah, they're both "big name" competitors, but those competitors rely *MUCH* more heavily on actual console sales then Nintendo doe
if, like rumble it is actually technology that was licensed from other companies it may be impossible for them to restrict access using patents.
my inside source at nintendo says they have taken interest in the "painstation" jokes and will be including a step-up transformer in the controller.
you do realize that MS LOSES money on every XBox sold right?
if by history you mean one system yes, and the Nintendo 64 was a good system, the games were fun, the graphics were amazing at the time. one questionably based argument about one system does not mean they have a "history" of screwing things up.
Repeat after me: Indymedia is not a source of respectable economic research.
Do you mind if i steal that for my sig?
and advertizer agrees to permit such truthful testimony on the subject of [prohibited conduct] notwithstanding any other agreement with any party
I don't understand what you mean by that, how could the company NOT allow testimony against them in court.
raw is NOT a format, i is raw pixel data, it can be presented in any format.
'established' by whom? your ass? the DMCA does not protect PD works.
if a license is not PRESENTED before the sale it is void, just mentioning that there is one or hiding it on the box somewhere does not make it valid.
more importantly, something like white balance information does not pass the "marginally creative" test for copyrightability, the data is purely functional for the purpose of properly rendering a photograph taken by the user of the camera.
What are you talking about? either you don't know anyhting about the DMCA or you are just trolling.
unless of course you need the functionality that a PBX provides and cannot afford the technical expertise to have it done all 1337 and stuff
The GPL was not "tested in court" the lawsuit was a contract dispute between SCO and IBM. Though i think it may have resulted in a few more PHB's hearing about linux and maybe being curious how it could save money to switch.
see, the problem with doing all that is that Orphans generally don't get pissed and riot, most of the entertainment in prisons isn't there so the inmates have a good time, but rather so they have something to do other than think up creative ways to kill the guards.
orphans are prohibited from asking someone to put things on their website? I couldn't care less about giving criminals with internet access. my issue would be with the government going after inmate websites operated by other people for them.
I have no problem with banning criminals from accessing the internet, however if the government tries to prevent them from mailing out material to put on their web site (so long as it is not illegal material) would be an egregious violation of civil rights
not to mention getting assraped by your HIV positive cellmate
so you would like the government to have the power to prohibit someone from making a website because they were convicted of a crime?
don't bother with a "little" UPS, get a UPS with power conditioning, they are usually the not so little 1000VA units
somebody call a fucking WAAAAAAAmbulance
have you played EQ2? see, unlike FFXI it has this property called "being fun"
eMachines is owned by gateway now.