Slashdot Mirror


Minority Report UI For The Military

merryprankster writes "New Scientist is reporting that a 'Minority Report' style interface is being developed by defense company Raytheon. Users don a pair of reflective gloves and manipulate images projected on a panoramic screen. A mounted camera keeps track of hand movements and a computer interprets gestures. Raytheon has even employed John Underkoffler, the researcher who proposed the interface to the makers of the film. Now just wait till Billboards start scanning your iris."

227 comments

  1. pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    i wonder what viewing porn will be like with these new gloves.

    1. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you now have some 'gestures' to work with when using lavalife...

    2. Re:pr0n by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Funny
      i wonder what viewing porn will be like with these new gloves

      You would not view porn. It would become more interactive. You would hump a wall.

      I just hope sex does not turn into "Demolition Man".

      Lenina: "Would you like to have sex?"
      John Spartan: "Oh yes!"
      Lenina: "Put this on"
      John Spartan: "What's that? And where does it go?"

      BTW, anyone ever figure out how the three shells work?

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:pr0n by mboverload · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hard to watch porn when it keeps going up and down in the playlist.

    4. Re:pr0n by slittle · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's one hell of a "boss button" - just like real life.. when you're about to get caught, grab the pr0n and throw it as far away as possible/under something else.

      Or.. *waves hand* this isn't teh pr0n you're looking for. err, I mean.. *waves* Hi boss! Yep, just checking these figures here, see? No problem.

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    5. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know, but I think that you will need only one globe.

    6. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hump a wall?

    7. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Or.. *waves hand* this isn't teh pr0n you're looking for. err, I mean.. *waves* Hi boss! Yep, just checking these figures here, see? No problem.

      "Hi, slittle! Why the fuck are you masturbating to an Excel spreadsheet?"

    8. Re:pr0n by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      This spreadsheet is hot!

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    9. Re:pr0n by moranar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hehehe. You don't know how to use the three shells. Man...

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    10. Re:pr0n by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It appears that the parent was assuming that haptic genital feedback would be "shitty" and that in order to get any sort of feeling out of virtual sex, you'd have to hump a wall or something like that.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    11. Re:pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just thinking about screwing over the customers.

    12. Re:pr0n by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Funny

      With figures like these, who wouldn't?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  2. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When will it carve wooden balls?

    1. Re:Yes, but by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be more interested in whose names will be on the balls...

      [soldier at facility] "Alert the president. We have a black ball. It's the Ayatollah. He'll want to handle this one personally. Get the spider hole team ready. We leave in 5. We'll stay for 5 too."

      [2nd solider] "Sir! We have another ball -- red. It appears that North Korea is tipping on its Axis of Evil."

      [1st soldier] "You can ignore that one. We always do. A nutjob with nukes isn't nearly as scary as these dictatorial types with oil."

      IronChefMorimoto

    2. Re:Yes, but by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Informative

      When it get's attached to this.

    3. Re:Yes, but by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > A nutjob with nukes isn't nearly as scary

      According to the Bush administration, North Korea has not yet proven it has nukes, beyond a reasonable doubt. Due process is such a convenient thing sometimes!

  3. BORING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought it was going to be an interface consisting of three psychic kids in tanks making all your decisions before you. That would be much more useful.

    1. Re:BORING by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Funny
      I thought it was going to be an interface consisting of three psychic kids in tanks making all your decisions before you. That would be much more useful.

      They would do a better job than Bush. Hell, three not-so-psychic kids would do a better job than Bush.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:BORING by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      somebody call a fucking WAAAAAAAmbulance

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:BORING by FredThompson · · Score: 1

      BORING is right. How original. At least you could have worked in a comment about "a Beowulf cluster of these"...

    4. Re:BORING by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Hey I don't care how it works, if it can make the pizza show up five minutes before I order it, I'm sold.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:BORING by SithGod · · Score: 1

      But if the pizza has already arrived, what's the purpose of then ordering it, thereby making the pizza never appear. I think I jsut gave myself a head ache. Time to order pizza

      --
      Don't you hate pants?
    6. Re:BORING by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      The pizza would probably become some sort of singularity, and instantly annihilate the rest of universe. But hey, at least there'd be pizza.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:BORING by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Yes, certainly anyone can do a better job than the man who brought stable governments to Afghanistan and Iraq, and who is desperately trying to make Social Security...secure.

  4. Wow - this technology is so new.... by tonsofpcs · · Score: 4, Informative

    It has been being done for years by the film and video industry, albeit mainly not in realtime, but such places as the Liberty Science Center had interactive games that used contrasting colors to determine what the player was doing [they had basketball for sometime where you wore either a chroma-blue or chroma-green glove]

    1. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by LnxAddct · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wouldn't it be easier to just put 5 little transmitters on the tips of the fingers and triangulate all fingers. It'd be much more accurate and have much less noise in the data. Some may argue that itd be too battery intensive, but there could be two solutions. A) The transmitters would be very low power because the distance needed wouldn't be very much and no intense processing would be needed on their part, they just have to send out some unique signal with time data. I know bluetooth devices now (PDAs and CellPhones) use bluetooth for hours without recharging in addition to full color screens and running a processor. This would just need the transmitter so a battery could last a very long time in addition to the distance being very short. B) Just use some kind of highly sensitive rfid technology so the gloves are "self powering" (not sure if the tech is at that stage yet).
      Regards,
      Steve

    2. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by CSMastermind · · Score: 1

      I played a game like that at the Pittsburgh Science Center in 5th grade (7 1/2 years ago), it was kinda neat you had a green screen behing you and looked at the monitor and you could use you gloves to play realistic basket ball. It was fun then, sounds like the technology is really picking up though, can't wait until I have a better home version of it.

    3. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      Yea, I think thats the same game, I remember you played against someone in some other Science Center somewhere [probably Pittsburgh] to try and get a better score.

    4. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not.. \booming-voice{ RFID! }

    5. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I remember you played
      wow you were stalking him way back then too?

    6. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The shape of your hand and, thus, how it interacts with things, can't be determined with just the positions of your finger tips.

      For example, notice you can independently bend your second and third knuckes. (Counting from the fingertip, that is.) Each possibility leads to a unique shape.

      I suspect the least uncomfortable system would be to have latex gloves with unqiuely-colored spots on key areas. Use a binary system with paints that only reflect at specific wavelengths, and create custom CCDs that detect on each of these channels. Reserve one wavelength for "invalid", to increase contrast between valid sensor spots and the rest of the glove.

    7. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      That seems to be similar what this thing [in the article] does, but it uses sets of coded white spots on a black background (glove) [like some 3d image acquisition programs/packages use].

    8. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, if you had position and orientation for each fingertip pad, there'd pretty much be only one position the hand could be in to achieve it. The rest of the parts of the fingers and hand could be interpolated.

      Try an experiment: fix your wrist, then position your fingertips in any configuration. Now, try moving any of your hand or finger bones while keeping the fingertips in the exact same position and orientation. It's very difficult, and you probably can't move those other bones too far.

      Besides, it would be very rare indeed if the orientation of the second and third knuckles independent of the fingertips would be relevant to the task being performed. And even if that were true, trying that experiment shows me the interpolated position probably wouldn't vary by more than a few degrees at most.

      Getting back to data gloves in general, I always thought the real data glove from many years ago was a clever piece of engineering. The one I remember seeing had an IR transceiver mounted on one side of each joint, and the IR beam was interrupted by variable width "vanes" affixed to the other side of each joint. The degree of flex was correlated to the amount of IR that was passed through the isolator. No moving or rotating parts to wear out (except for the glove,) and no friction for the user.

      --
      John
    9. Re:Wow - this technology is so new.... by paul.schulz · · Score: 1

      Another example of how similar technology
      is being used: http://www.tinmith.net/

      The camera is mounted on the head and with AR
      goggles, you can manipulate images suspended
      in space.

      Wayne will be at the LCA2005 conference in
      Canberra Australia the week, talking about his
      work.

  5. Johnny Mnemonic by headkase · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Finally, a good explanation for the data-gloves Reeves used in the movie.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Johnny Mnemonic by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

      cruise. as in top gun.

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
    2. Re:Johnny Mnemonic by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      No, Reeves, as in Johnny in the titular movie. You just didn't notice that the parent was talking about a different movie (look at the subject line).

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    3. Re:Johnny Mnemonic by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

      i apologise. i'm assuming that it's a reference to when he goes online with the gloves and the 'vr' headset?

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
  6. This looks like a great recipe for an accident :/ by Paris+The+Pirate · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am way too clumsy to be trusted with one of these things. I have visions of my self slipping and dragging everything where it is not supposed to be dragged. Or something. Maybe I just fear change.

  7. Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This appears to be wasteful spending. I wonder what congressional district the defense company is located in?

    The system under development at Raytheon lets users don a pair of reflective gloves and manipulate images projected on a panoramic screen. A mounted camera keeps track of hand movements and a computer interprets gestures

    "Hand gestures, unlike a mouse or pointer, work really well when data is represented on wall-sized displays, for example."

    And where in the field will this be used?

    Am I the only one who gets scared when I imagine what a room in the pentagon might look like, with Generals wearing special glasses, and moving projected data off walls?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by FredThompson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The U.S. military has operated in 3 dimensions since the Civil War.

      This might be useful in air combat control. There's got to be a limit to what can be conveyed on a flat computer screen or edge-lit piece of glass.

      It might also be useful for detecting patterns in huge amounts of data. You've probably seen images where data is represented by a 3D projection. If you could manipulate the interpretation from inside, maybe you could see patterns more readily than from a fixed viewing point outside the system.

      Besides, think of how fun it would be to play Populous with one of these and really "shoot" lightning bolts out of your fingers.

      Pretty dangerous if you pick your nose or scratch your crotch, though, don't you think?

    2. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This appears to be wasteful spending.

      Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET.

      I wonder what congressional district the defense company is located in?

      Edward J. Markey (Ranking Democrat on the Telecommunications and Internet subcommittee)

      Raytheon is based in Waltham, Massachussetts, but they have offices everywhere. Canada, Japan, Oz...
      And they are Linux friendly.

      And where in the field will this be used?
      One use might be a virtual sand table. Not everything the military does is 'in the field'.

      Am I the only one who gets scared when I imagine what a room in the pentagon might look like, with Generals wearing special glasses, and moving projected data off walls?

      Probably.
      Generals don't move data. They direct Col's and Majors to do that.

    3. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pretty dangerous if you pick your nose or scratch your crotch, though, don't you think?

      So it's an interface for third base coaches?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Wasteful government spending is one thing. It's usually paying many times what some average Joe could buy at Walmart or Home Depot. But the government spending money on new technology can be a good thing. People on /. love to bitch about how US companies don't actually invent anything new. So maybe the government investing in technology is good for the country in the long run.

      I mean, hell, where would the internet have come from?

    5. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Seminal,

      As the general in charge of the "Five Grand Crapper Initiative" here at the Dept. of Defense, I take offense with your assertion that we waste taxpayer money or that our decisions are based on congressional vote buying.

      I assure you, our decision to fund research into WMD-reisitant albino elephants, calfs made EMP-proof by gold plating, and pig meat for distribution to patriotic voters had nothing to do with the esteemed congresswhores^H^H^H^H^H^Hmen from those states.

      Why, I am writing this to you right now on a paper computer built for over ten million dollars, thin and flexible as real paper, but with a full computer interface! A marvel of engineering! I am also on one of the prototype $5,000 crappers, and I must say it is the most comfortable dump I have ever taken. It's the next best thing to shitting on taxpayers.

      Uh oh, it looks like I'm out of paper. I guess I will have to wipe my ass with Slashdot posts.

      - Gen. Pork

    6. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This appears to be wasteful spending.

      Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET.


      Not knocking your defense of the research, but a Carl Sagan quote comes to mind: "They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."

    7. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      The last 2-3 wars Americans have bombed canadian troops by accident.

      Anything which would prevent that would be nice :)

    8. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Granted, but we're talking different things. Carl Sagan was talking about believing in people's ideas. All the parent was talking about was giving them taxpayers' money. ...

      Well, that doesn't mean you should dismiss the idea out hand per se. I don't have too much of a problem with the government throwing money at research of debatable practicality if the research is done responsibly. It sounds like a dumb idea, (gorilla arm and all that) but I suppose it could be pretty slick if you did it right.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    9. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      They seem to be mac os X friendly too, look at the screenshot in the article, its OS X =)

    10. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This appears to be wasteful spending.

      Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET.


      ARPANET wasn't about replacing nimble control with sluggish/gross control or mimicking movies that involved lotto balls as a core element.

      I really don't see much here that can't be done using a smaller finger controlled representation of the bigger one.

      The arm waving thing is generally idiotic, like most Speilberg stuff...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    11. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by bcmm · · Score: 2, Informative

      So why not use a big touchscreen? I've used on of those, it has a projector, and you can click, double-click, drag, everything except right-click really easiely by just touching it.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    12. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      In the last 2-3 wars Americans have bombed pretty much all of their allies by accident.

      For some reason I doubt that the addition of augmented reality systems in a limited set of coordination situations is going to do very much to prevent pilots blowing up the wrong things or stop trigger-happy troops that appear incapable of determining who is on their side from making a complete arse of things.

    13. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Someone probably said the same thing about ARPANET."

      Yes, without the ARPANET we wouldn't have been able to fight off that Russian attack, the dot-com millionares would be on welfare and we wouldn't be able to read story dupes on Slashdot. Your parents tax billions well spent, I'd say.

    14. Re:Where do the $5,000 toilet seats go? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      In the last war many US Air Force pilots also took out many US Marines.....The same thing happened in the first gulf war, too. Being a recently retired Marine, I can tell you our planes can be a pretty unnerving sight in combat.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
  8. More than a defence contractor by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Raytheon is more than a defence contractor. They make alot of commercial electronics, including alot of marine equipment such as radar and radios.

    1. Re:More than a defence contractor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok the article says Raytheon is a defense company. Whats your point ?

    2. Re:More than a defence contractor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so people don't yell out "OMG TEH WASTE OF MONIES!"

      p.s. dont use caps, lameness filter blah blah

    3. Re:More than a defence contractor by Kris+Magnusson · · Score: 1

      In Heinlein's "Time for the Stars," Raytheon made killer ray guns.

      Where's my killer ray gun, Raytheon? I need to frag my opponent. Your name suggests such weapons. ........ kris

      --
      "I thought I could organize freedom. How Scandinavian of me."
    4. Re:More than a defence contractor by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      They also have a good size air traffic control business. They are the people that developed STARS the new terminal software for all us airports.

    5. Re:More than a defence contractor by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Where's my killer ray gun, Raytheon?

      Raytheon employees (well, at least _one_) have already been accidently killed by ray-guns. The devices were intended as EMP-projectors to disable electronics, but even indirect exposure turned out to be majorly carcinogenic.

  9. imagine the "training aid" by FredThompson · · Score: 3, Funny

    A buddy of mine used to defend Windows Solitaire while in the Navy by claiming it was a clever interface training aid. That worked on every senior officer who complained about "playing games."

    What "training aid" will ship with these gloves? Virtual handball?

    Ooohhh...VirtualBoy on steroids!!

    1. Re:imagine the "training aid" by Soko · · Score: 1

      What "training aid" will ship with these gloves? Virtual handball?

      Well, since the 'net runs on pr0n...

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:imagine the "training aid" by Mahou · · Score: 1

      hopefully some kind of jedi academy game.
      finally a possible interface to use the force!

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    3. Re:imagine the "training aid" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A buddy of mine used to defend Windows Solitaire while in the Navy by claiming it was a clever interface training aid.

      That's how it's described in Windows 3.11's manual: a trainint tool to familiarize with the mouse-based user interface (or something like that). I was in the manual library at my job recently, cleaning up after six years of neglect. I found the full set of floppies with the manual ... scary!

  10. Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... personalised billboards will also be here soon, thanks to RFID in practically everything.

  11. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude, the psychics weren't an INTERFACE, they were the BACK END.

    It's a Beowulf cluster of retarded psychic babies. Duh.

  12. Has potential (that's being wasted) by menace3society · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The advantage of using gloves is not to get a more intuitive, 3-D version of the mouse. The advantage to gloves is that you can have more than one (or two) pointers on a screen. Imagine using photoshop or some other editing software, and, instead of having to mouse around or hit keys to change tools, you just contracted a different finger. Touch typing is much faster than hunt-and-peck; why shouldn't the same be the case for graphical interfaces?

    1. Re:Has potential (that's being wasted) by jbplou · · Score: 1

      That is the most ridiculously stupid comment I've ever heard. If it was so much better to have multiple pointers, then we all would be using touch screen monitors, which have been out for years and allow for all 10 fingers to be pointers.

    2. Re:Has potential (that's being wasted) by CommanderData · · Score: 1

      No, because a touch screen still only allows a single point of contact at a time, and more importantly- what the grandparent meant by "multiple pointers" is that each finger could act like a different mouse button. Using two hands, you would have the equivalent of a 10 button mouse and elicit different responses depending on what finger you used. Not to mention if you have those functions carefully mapped to complement each other you can have two independent cursors on screen, one for each hand.

      --
      Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  13. Do they also replicate the part of the interface.. by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. where to copy a file from one side of the room to the other, they essentially use a ***giant floppy disk***? Sure, it was a cool floppy disk, with live action video playing on it, but still... its a floppy disk.

    You'd have thunk that by the time they had perfected 3D holography and VR manipulation, they could at least have kept up with some high-capacity networking. I guess not - floppys are the future!

  14. Jim Allchin: "That'll be in Longhorn too." by michaeldot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tomorrow's news today: Microsoft invites bloggers with high readership to dinner. Shows them previews of Minority Report style interface. Bloggers write gushing reports about it.

    1. Re:Jim Allchin: "That'll be in Longhorn too." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Microsoft showed something similar to this at their last tech-fest a few months ago. Except you didn't need to use special gloves, and the interaction was a bit more interesting.

      For example, you could hold up a sheet of paper against the screen for a moment, then take it away; you would then see the image on the sheet of paper you had held up -- you were then able to move it around and manipulate it...

  15. Gorilla arms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This will not be a technology with mass appeal, for the same reason as the light pen fad of the 1980s went nowhere: Humans just don't like holding their arms extended in front of them for long periods, it is very uncomfortable.

    I have a (cool) Wacom Cintiq tablet, and, in contrast, it is completely bearable and even comfortable because it is (almost) horizontal when I use it. If I had to use it vertically like a 1980s home light-pen system for a C64 (which I am old enough to have used briefly...), my arms would be in constant pain by now.

    1. Re:Gorilla arms. by FredThompson · · Score: 1

      Girly-man! Pump iron!!! ...and eat your spinach.

      Popeye wouldn't have a problem with this.

    2. Re:Gorilla arms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      popeye had huge forearms... so if he shouldn't have a problem neither should slashdotters
      ba dum psh

  16. Coming up next by secolactico · · Score: 1, Funny

    Good. Now that they have that resolved, they can focus on the really important tech: "Sick Sticks".

    --
    No sig
    1. Re:Coming up next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for fancy tech for those. Just wrap a pic of goatse or tubgirl around a baton and have a button that instantly unfurls it. Same effect for a lot less money.

  17. I'm Impressed by Effugas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In tech, we often find ourselves referring to the Hollywood Operating System. You know, the one where every key press makes a "click" sound, and passwords are cracked one character at a time (admittedly, something that actually worked against Windows 9x file shares).

    I was actually impressed with the UI in Minority Report. I'm not saying it was necessarily perfect, but it wasn't obviously ridiculous either. There is a need to monitor information flows across many different sources, to simultaneously sense them, and to have the ability to integrate on demand. A large display with linkable data nodes is one approach that deserves further analysis.

    1. Re:I'm Impressed by porp · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, watching interviews and the special features on the _Minority Report_ DVD, Spielberg and Co really sat down with a group of pretty smart individuals to realistically futurize a not to distant world.

      I really found that the images/technology the filmmakers collaborated on and, ultimately, created seems feasible, eventual, and very futuristic--granted, it's one of my favorite movies from the past 5 years.

      porp

    2. Re:I'm Impressed by WhatsAProGingrass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but if you watch carefully, they still need to transfer data onto a disk to get information from one computer 5ft away from the other computer. Blows my mind why they just can't do it wirelessly, or even have the computer's hard wired, they are so close.

      --
      Mark
    3. Re:I'm Impressed by Hatta · · Score: 1

      In tech, we often find ourselves referring to the Hollywood Operating System. You know, the one where every key press makes a "click" sound

      I use a Model M you insensitive clod!

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:I'm Impressed by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In tech, we often find ourselves referring to the Hollywood Operating System. You know, the one where every key press makes a "click" sound, and passwords are cracked one character at a time (admittedly, something that actually worked against Windows 9x file shares).

      Not to mention that text appears line by line on screen (slower than a PCXT) with a sound reminiscent of a line printer...

      I was actually impressed with the UI in Minority Report.

      I don't know why MR is getting the "credit" for this. It's hardly a new idea in academia; in fiction there's of course Neuromancer-style cyberspace (and and many others), and in movies 1995's Johnny Mnemonic (almost exactly the same) and 1994's Disclosure (full body immersion).

      The latter reminds me of another element of the Hollywood interface: files are deleted line by line, or page by page, as you watch... and no one ever seems to have an offline backup, one copy is all there is.

    5. Re:I'm Impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is very odd considering the computer WAS connected to the precogs in the sealed room. (Computer-Brain interface easier than Computer-Computer interface?)

    6. Re:I'm Impressed by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      i've worked a bit in the industry, and was often frustrated by similar things in other films.

      the "dumbness" meter in a film is inversely proportional to the size of the intended audience. Filmmakers try to visualize things on-screen (like the transfer of a file from one console to another) visually because they don't want to *confuse* the base audience, whom they *correctly* assume is not tech savvy. It's why a hacker's hacking ability is directly related to his ability to type really fast or be Seth Green... shopping bags always have french bread, etc. The film industry assumes that it needs to tickle its audience with anvils as opposed to feathers.

      (A perfect example of this: it was a huge issue in the Spiderman films to make the webs come from his wrists as opposed to web shooters. As his primary visual *power* is web slinging, they felt that the audience would feel cheated by a super hero whose primary power came from a gadget he invented. Also, the film played down Peter Parker's intelligence because people hate feeling dumb.)

      Living in an urban center where most people are relatively well educated, it's easy to assume that the country is homogenous. But the same half of the country that voted for George Bush probably shares his affinity for all things *internets*. The film industry has rightly concluded that its easier to impress duller people into parting with their cash. Smart folks ask too many questions and expect no plot holes. Dullards want cool explosions and obligatory punchlines. (Speaking of which, I know a punchline guy who gets 15-30K a punchline. he gets paid to go through scripts and put in a couple of punchlines. nepotism gig.)

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    7. Re:I'm Impressed by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

      you have to bear in mind the application of that technology: they were manipulating tiny fragments of corrupt video data. this inteface is very good for viewing graphical fragments, but i see less of an application for - say - word-processing.

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
    8. Re:I'm Impressed by danila · · Score: 1

      I don't know why MR is getting the "credit" for this.

      It's simple PR. They had a site running before the film was released where they explained how they had such a cool team of futurists. And they issued a press release. Of course, the gadget-whores at Wired and other places could not pass the opportunity to drool. Since the journalists rarely do enough research, (and don't care) they never mentioned earlier prototypes/ideas.

      and no one ever seems to have an offline backup, one copy is all there is.
      Well, you'd be surprised at how realistic this actually is. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:I'm Impressed by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      and no one ever seems to have an offline backup, one copy is all there is.

      And how's that different to Real Life? ;)

  18. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by michaeldot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you better try the Apple solution: it will only come with one glove.

  19. Interesting, but misguided by MyIS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see this as being pretty exhausting after prolonged use. Perhaps if minute hand movements were translated into large gestures on the big screen... but that's what a conventional mouse does. I think the most revolutionary part would be to make "drag-drop" thing a lot more physical, i.e. add small amounts of inertia to dragged objects. Also, Google for the copy-paste pen device - really nifty stuff.

    --
    http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Interesting, but misguided by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      True. But it is for the military, so maybe it could be part of a fitness regime as well.

    2. Re:Interesting, but misguided by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would make sense for everyday computing. But in more specialized roles. The article had a picture of some guy waving his hand over a map. I imagine a big screen wall at a police headquarters or something like that, where a couple cops can look at where their different patrol cars are at. They're starting with a zoomed out view of the whole city, when one part catches their eye. So a guy sort of cups his hand around a couple city blocks and then pulls it away from the screen. As he pulls away, the image zooms in to that part, giving them a more detailed view. Then maybe he touches a few of the dots on the screen representing patrol cars which makes the screen display data as to who's in them, how they're armed, etc.

      I don't think the best use for this stuff will be for me and you to navigate our harddrives and organize our mp3 collections. But if you could develop a system (ideally without gloves), where a few people could stand around a screen and interact with it collaboratively and freely, it'd be very useful.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  20. Because it is exhausting by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a reason none of these VR interfaces never go anywhere. The human body is not designed to hold it's arms suspended in mid-air for extende dperiods of time.

    Try it yourself - stick your hands in front of the monitor, a bit below level with your shoulders. Feel free to move them around as if you are "manipulating".

    Now, see how long you can hold them up there before your shoulders give out.

    Now compare that to how long you can use a keyboard and mouse in one session.

    It is not even in the same ballpark.

    1. Re:Because it is exhausting by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd mod you up insightful but I've already commented here.

      That was exactly my first thought -- waving your arms around is bloody tiring. Heck, I like to have my mouse tracking set so I can pretty much move the cursor from one side of the screen to the other by just flexing my fingers, the heel of my palm pretty much rests in one spot (and in a different spot when using the keyboard).

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Because it is exhausting by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given the sedentry lifestyles we live today, I'd think getting tired using a computer is good, both in the sense it burns a few more calories, and discourages extended periods of usage.

    3. Re:Because it is exhausting by Tlosk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is and it isn't. Anytime you try doing some physical activity you are unaccustomed to there will be an adaptation period where you experience fatigue and soreness. Once your muscles have adapted though you hardly notice it at all.

      If you never take the stairs, try walking down 8 or 10 flights of stairs, the next day your calves will be thrashed, but if you do it every day you won't even notice it a bit.

      Or try mixing concrete by hand, uber hard labor if it's not something you're used to, but run of the mill for people that do it regularly.

      Holding your hands in the air isn't exactly hard labor lol, although I suspect we'd also do it standing just like they did in the movies, the kinematics of moving your arms and hands is very different standing than it is sitting.

    4. Re:Because it is exhausting by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Ideally, not everything you do with a computer needs to be directed by your hands or gestures. Give the computer a decent head-direciton and eyeball-direction-watching ability, and some decent voice recognition. 90% of my interaction with people is through voice; I only resort to my hands when words are insufficient or too slow. Why shouldn't I direct a computer the same way?

    5. Re:Because it is exhausting by mboos · · Score: 1
      --
      --Mike Boos
    6. Re:Because it is exhausting by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      Oh don't get me wrong, I also think this control method stinks and will never go anywhere, but it will be for the reasons you just mentioned, not because it's too tiring. I could see it maybe in some highly specialized settings with a custom UI for the job, but it will never gain any traction as a general interface.

    7. Re:Because it is exhausting by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In each of your examples, the muscles involved get a chance at rest.

      Holding your arms out continually puts some muscles under constant tension. No muscle in the human body was designed for that kind of punishment; Even the heart muscles, composed of the only muscle tissue that doesn't get tired, get rest periods every beat.

    8. Re:Because it is exhausting by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      Your point is interesting. But, I think these will work anyways.

      The interfaces could work in the same space that your keyboard and mouse work today.

      And second, people make hand gestures when they talk with each other in person. Just because they can't constantly be gesticulating constantly, it doesn't mean that it's not useful to do it now and then.

      I can imagine someone lifting their hands off their keyboard, and then performing spatial operations just a few inches in the plane above. Perhaps moving a window around, perhaps drawing a path with their finger, something like that.

    9. Re:Because it is exhausting by kubalaa · · Score: 1

      Maybe you were imagining something like this: TouchStream keyboard

      --

      "If you look 'round the table and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you." -- Quiz Show

    10. Re:Because it is exhausting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. I attended a lecture by Jaron Lanier, one of the designers of that interface, a few weeks ago, and he said it was supposed to be one of those ideas that looks cool at first but doesn't work in practice, in fitting with the dystopian nature of the film. (Also, the technology was obsolete when the film came out three years ago.)

      Tom Cruise and his stunt double had to put metal rods up their shirtsleeves to keep their hands in place.

      And yet Lanier still gets contacted by people who want to put it into production use, because it looked so cool in the movies...

    11. Re:Because it is exhausting by blincoln · · Score: 1

      The human body is not designed to hold it's arms suspended in mid-air for extende dperiods of time.

      Tomorrow on Slashdot: "Laws" of Physics Disproved, armchair UFO gravity drive researchers cite orchestra conductors as evidence that modern science is flawed, based on false presumptions.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    12. Re:Because it is exhausting by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For one thing, an orchestra conductor's hands are *frequently* at his sides for periods throughout the piece.

      For another, I don't know of many people conducing 8 hour symphonys 5 nights a week.

    13. Re:Because it is exhausting by bitinglobster · · Score: 1

      but do you have the arm strength? http://www.ok-cancel.com/comic/3.html (comic from OK/Cancel)

    14. Re:Because it is exhausting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha i like his idea of a future interface

    15. Re:Because it is exhausting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be quite a good idea. With precise enough imaging I'm sure the computer could discern quite accurately what your eyes were looking at.

      Maybe then you could have squint clicking, or even wink clicking?

    16. Re:Because it is exhausting by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      The human body is not designed to hold it's arms suspended in mid-air for extende dperiods of time. it is unnecessary to hold your hands in front of your body, when in fact your hands could just hang there relaxed but the fingers could be moving objects on the screen in front of you.

    17. Re:Because it is exhausting by wooby · · Score: 1

      People in the military can attest to your statement. If you've ever done a few hundred "overhead arm claps" you'll now how even after just several minutes of holding your arms at shoulder level, they begin to feel like lead. Sure, you get better at it - but will people really want to? I see this approach as an input method that requires far too much actual movement. I'd put my money on input devices that interpret nerve signals or brainwaves.

    18. Re:Because it is exhausting by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      Rest your forearms or elbows on the table, problem solved. The movie provides an illustrative example, not the sole operational parameters.

    19. Re:Because it is exhausting by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Where in "VR" does it say "holding your arms out in mid-air"?

      There is a reason none of these VR interfaces never go anywhere. The human body is not designed to hold it's arms suspended in mid-air for extende dperiods of time.

      Although that phenomenon is real (it is called gorilla arm syndrome), it doesn't have to be an obstacle to glove-based VR interfaces.

      Designers simply have to overcome the ingrained idea that the operator must be reaching towards a viewable surface horizontally beside her, instead of vertically below. There is no reason your digi-gloved hands can't still be giving useful inputs even while they are hanging at waist level, or resting on a desk (possibly with the view area on the table surface itself)

    20. Re:Because it is exhausting by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      For one thing,

      For a 3rd thing, the accuracy demanded of the conductor is less than from a computer operator. The music-man has one fairly specific task, while the computer could be assigned any kind of job. Some of those may demand great accuracy. This Raytheon system uses gloves, and will probably record where you squeeze/click at high resolution.

      A conductor could carry out her job even if she had no fingers, and just a stick glued to her palm. All she needs to do is provide rythm and impact, or occasionally point at someone. The viewers of her action are intelligent and adaptive humans, not the fairly unforgiving logic of a computer.

    21. Re:Because it is exhausting by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Oh, bullshit.

      So now we have to train every stupid operator to be able to handle 8 to 10 hours of this a day, in addition to learning the new interface.

      Why not give them senso-finger-cots and a digitizer pad? You can stretch your fingers a lot farther on a desk mounted pad than you can on a full sized screen.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    22. Re:Because it is exhausting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once your muscles have adapted though you hardly notice it at all.

      You seem to have little knowledge of muscles and "physical activity" (well you are on slashdot aren't you?).

      If people were to try using this as a computer interface injuries would (at least) double.

      This is simply another in a long line of failures based on poor thinking.

  21. Are you crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I get so lazy sometimes, that instead of leaning all the way up to the keyboard, I copy and paste letters to spell out words with the mouse, and you want me to USE MY ARMS!?!?!!?!!?

    I'll need to down a bottle of water just to get my computer out of sleep mode.

    Gestures are a gateway interface :)

    1. Re:Are you crazy? by sbillard · · Score: 1

      Is this a joke?
      I'm not sure becasue I recently met someone like you, or the person you claim to be.
      He would drag out a word and paste it somewhere else instead of typing.
      Made me tear my hair out.

      There are 101+ keys on the board. Why do you need two more that roll around?

      Just tap it out. tappa tappa tappa

    2. Re:Are you crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I might do it every once in a while, but I usually realize it's taken more energy to copy and paste than if I sat up in the first place. Then I feel stupid AND lazy :)

  22. getting there... by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...but I believe that in Minority Report they were using OLEDs ie no projector. Wake me up when they have OLEDs in mass production, that is a lot more interesting.

  23. for the curious by same_old_story · · Score: 3, Informative

    John Underkoffler came from MIT's tangible media group

  24. Mod Parent Up by RGTAsheron · · Score: 0

    Seems like a good idea. I'd like to see a response from someone whom works with mo. cap. :)

  25. BORING-Keyboard Katastrophy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I thought it was going to be an interface consisting of three psychic kids in tanks making all your decisions before you. That would be much more useful."

    I predict you will have a terrible typing accident, that'll leave us scared for life.

  26. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's all wonderfully productive until some bozo offers to shake your hand while you're busy working, and you brush all your work off the screen.

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem. We'll just have to adopt slightly different conventions.

      When you greet somebody, instead of shaking hands, nod your head.

      Then, since nodding can't be used to mean "yes", you'll indicate "yes" by shrugging your shoulders.

      To say "maybe", shoulders are already used, so you'll tap your feet.

      That screws up the "ok, any day now..." impatient tapping, so for that, you'll use pelvic thrusting.

      Nobody has any business doing pelvic thrusting at work right now, anyway, so that should be OK.

      (And no, you can't just short-circuit this list and make "hello" = pelvic thrusting, because that just would be silly.)

  27. I thought they called this by Daedalus_ · · Score: 1

    the Nintendo Power Glove?

  28. Re:Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I like Swordfish, I really dislike the horribly fake computer stuff in it...especially how Hugh Jackman types in code without ever having a prompt......

  29. the government hides spending better than that by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder what congressional district the defense company is located in?

    Raytheon has facilities in almost every state. They merged with Hughes a while back, and manufacture a wide variety of defense equipment, especially in the aerospace sector.

    And where in the field will this be used?

    The article says, in the field of satellite reconnaissance imagery. It'd be like using a mouse, except you can move more than one screen object at once with the fluidity of every day hand motions. Far more efficient.

    Am I the only one who gets scared when I imagine what a room in the pentagon might look like, with Generals wearing special glasses, and moving projected data off walls?

    Probably. Most men are made of sterner stuff.

    1. Re:the government hides spending better than that by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      The article says, in the field of satellite reconnaissance imagery. It'd be like using a mouse, except you can move more than one screen object at once with the fluidity of every day hand motions. Far more efficient.

      So why not just design an interface that lets you use two mice(mouses?) at the same time?
      Seems like it'd be easier on the arms.

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  30. Interface by sbillard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Push/Pull
    Slide/Spin/Twist
    Grab/Grip/Grok/Associate
    Wipe/Toss
    ...So many more distinct gestures/commands are possilbe.
    I read a lot of Phillip K Dick and the interface portrayed in Minority Report was wonderfull.... not the goop-pool..... I'm refering to the the big screen Tom Cruise manipulated.... the goop-pool interface is the opposite extreme.
    Nice story...original author highly recommended.

    it makes me wonder. Which side are you on?

    Hoppy Harrington says "Hi"gher

    1. Re:Interface by UTPinky · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the "other" gesture for when it crashes...

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  31. "virus'" by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've seen a lot of stupid ways of writing the plural form of "virus." A single apostrophe is probably the stupidest.

    1. Re:"virus'" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go home and take your viri with you.

      translation: Go home and take your men with you.

      • virii
      • virus'
      • viruses
  32. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by AJWM · · Score: 5, Funny

    the Apple solution: it will only come with one glove.

    Correction: a mitten.

    --
    -- Alastair
  33. Seems like an awfully inefficient UI by sector · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA but...

    The UI was one of the things I disliked most about 'Minority Report'. Seems to me it's a very inefficient interface...requiring large arm-waving motions to do menial tasks like moving windows. It makes for good Hollywood visuals but I can't imagine myself using something like this in a daily computing environment. On the other hand, maybe this is one way to make lazy programmers exercise.

    On the surface, one of the apparent benefits of the Minority Report UI is it seems somewhat faster than today's mouse-driven interfaces. But given that the M.R. world has advanced retina scanning technology, why not design a UI around pupil-tracking? I can glance at a window much faster than I can point to it.

    1. Re:Seems like an awfully inefficient UI by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me it's a very inefficient interface...requiring large arm-waving motions to do menial tasks like moving windows

      it is. But it wasn't designed to be a computer UI. It was designed to work with the thought-process of the user.

      Have you ever stood up and walked to think? Ever wanted to guesture and put something on the wall?

      It's a useful technology. Not one that you'd use next to your keyboard, but one that you'd use to direct a media stream or command a hundred distinct fire-teams.

    2. Re:Seems like an awfully inefficient UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your computer doesn't also have a 70+" monitor that requires you to stand up in front of it.

      retina scanning is nice. but how will you tell it that you would like to drag a window into main focus? maybe the user wants to use a small subscreen as a guide for the main screen. or if the user wants to highlight a screen but apply some type of filter on it (whereas a user can apply a type of filter on it by tapping with a pinking while moving a window).

    3. Re:Seems like an awfully inefficient UI by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has the advantage of scale. Moving macroscopic windows about on a desktop-sized screen, with many of them located in your peripheral vision, helps with your thought process. The movements, while not ideal for typing, are also normal, daily, real-world-sized motions, which don't requires as much of a mental shift. Since you're not trying to adapt to the unnatural one hand, 1-2 finger (depending on how many buttons your mouse has) interface, and can move freely, you're spending less energy adapting yourself to the environment, and have more mental power available for thinking.

      We were just playing around years ago with a stereo wall, and I found that data was easier to visualize, and the gyromouse interface was more natural than a puck on a desk. On the other hand, this was still only one handed, and there are times that you wanted to be able to use the other hand for more operations.

      The average office-drone isn't going to have this technology, but architects, doctors, scientists, etc, will take to it once the space/price issues for the screens get solved.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  34. Accuracy? by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how accurate this would be. Would it even be really useful for first person shooters that require pinpoint precision? I would say no, but then again, I'm somehow fairly accurate with a mouse, so my hands can be accurate with training. I'm not sure about the whole arm bit though.

    1. Re:Accuracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, probably as accurate as you needed.

      Remember that with Englebart's original mouse, the precision wasn't very good at all. As a workaround, you first pressed a button to indicate what you were clicking on (I'm clicking on a paragraph/line/word/letter) so it didn't need to try to figure out (possibly incorrectly) the right letter, if you wanted to select an entire paragraph.

      First-person shooters are trying to simulate a gun, after all. So make your "mouse" a gun. Do you ask marksmen how they can possibly have pinpoint precision with a gun?

  35. Also.. by pherthyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have a look at HandVu for something that works right now.

    I was planning on writing something similar to this (actually, very similar, same libraries and everything) but now may just build on top of the HandVu libraries instead.

  36. Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac by flonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps it was a security measure. An air gap, if you will. (Not to be confused with the "air gap firewall" marketing BS.)

  37. To Quote Mr. Cranky... by Knnniggit · · Score: 2, Funny

    After reading this, Mr. Cranky's review of Minority Report stands out in my mind. "After the balls roll out of the ramp, Anderton stands in front of a huge screen with his hands up in the air and attempts to masturbate imaginary pigeons. (Okay, I get what he's doing, but the idea that operating a computer 52 years from now will be something akin to air Kung Fu seems excessively stupid.)" ^^^^^ What he said.

    --
    Brain kills internet cells.
  38. Cool now my carpal tunnel will move to my shoulder by bxbaser · · Score: 3, Funny

    eom

  39. So what happens when... by Crash+McBang · · Score: 1

    ...the NCO waving his arms (no general in his right mind is gonna use this, he's gonna sit in a chair and use a laser pointer to tell the NCO what to do) has to scratch his butt?

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
  40. Learn Your Eye Parts by skeg · · Score: 1

    I think it's retna scan, not iris scan.

    1. Re:Learn Your Eye Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's retina scan, not retna scan.

    2. Re:Learn Your Eye Parts by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Whichever part it is, if such a scan became common, I predict a sudden rise in sales of the Shine Job silver contact lenses as worn by Vin Diesel in The Chronicles of Riddick.

  41. Re:Big deal... by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Funny
    when they get the computer interface from swordfish...

    The one that gives you a blowjob while you code?

  42. I'm Impressed-Graphical Grease. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.crg.cs.nott.ac.uk/research/applications /pits/

    "We refer to the generated visualizations as Populated Information Terrains (PITS) to reflect the the fact that a key feature of this work is that these visualizations are intended to be multi-user applications in which the users are explicity embodied in the virtual environment and are thus visible to each other."

    http://www.aalab.net/projects/maps/

    "

    The Map Is The Territory

    visualizing on-line communities "

  43. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    Specially if you sneeze in the most inappropriate moment.

  44. weehooooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beiderbecke78@aol.com

    this is an awesome website

    where do i sign up?

    blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah zxcv!

    1. Re:weehooooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beiderbecke78@aol.com heheheh xcvb

  45. OS on the screen by MacTaranis · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one to notice that they are using Mac OS X? I if look in the picture, the window containing the satellite photo, is defiantly from Mac OS X.

    1. Re:OS on the screen by courseB · · Score: 1

      I if look in the picture, the window containing the satellite photo, is defiantly from Mac OS X.

      it might be a still from a hollywood movie then.

    2. Re:OS on the screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      defiantly from Mac OS X
      Oh, so it had been told to be from WinME and it proudly and stubbornly refused to listen. That's definitely what happened...
    3. Re:OS on the screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the interpretation software ran on Windows, would gesturing a three-finger salute restart the computer?

    4. Re:OS on the screen by Helios292 · · Score: 1

      No, they just use the integrated spellchecker service in OS X and forgot to doublecheck. :-D

  46. The one gesture that is going to be important... by madscience · · Score: 0

    I'm all for this as a means of data manipulation, as long as they map the middle finger to ctrl-alt-del.

  47. Several different uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pr0n, of course. But submarine simulators and fighter jet simulators will be awesome. Memorizing keyboard mappings will be a thing of the past. There's a thousand different uses for this, above and beyone what Nintendo tried to do with the Powerglove (more lik powerflop, am i rite?).

    Organic chemistry isomers and you'll have people with their own portable mini projectors to flip molecules around and stuff.

    I can see where medical school students could use it for anatomy and pathology.

    Pretty cool once it starts working well.

  48. I hope so. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Now that's one nice, robust computing platform I'd like to leverage.

    Of course, one who uses words like robust, platform and leverage will never use that sort of interface. *sigh*

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  49. The Gumby Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Push/Pull
    Slide/Spin/Twist
    Grab/Grip/Grok/Assoc iate
    Wipe/Toss"

    Also known as the chiropractor's best friend.

  50. But the irises are already obsolete by isdnip · · Score: 1

    I agree with many other commenters that the hand-wavey interface makes better cinema than UI. I'd find it tiring too, and besides, if I want to scratch an itch on my body or something, I wouldn't want the computer to delete files or something. Being able to lose contact with the computer is handy.

    But the comment about iris-reading billboards reminds me of what really scares me. That was a clever fictional technique in its day, but who needs it when there's RFID? You have a chip in your clothes, wallet, sneakers, EasyPass, SpeedPass, passport, or under your skin, and anybody can read who you are without the relatiavely tricky effort of reading irises. Big Brother's then able to find you, even if it turns out to be the same "personalized advertising" provider that reads the web cookies. (And has a feed into federal, state and local police.)

    And remembert to turn the aGPS in their cellphone to "911 only"....

  51. If you're so lazy... by crypto55 · · Score: 1

    The system is not intended for widespread implementation at the current level. It's for accessing large amounts of information simultaneously. It's not about to be used in your average workplace, except maybe in high-priority design apps. I'm sad that it's being developed. I had thought up the idea a while back... All the good tech is being developed before I can get out of college.

    --
    Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
  52. Worse yet... by Nimloth · · Score: 0
    Now just wait till Billboards start scanning your iris
    You think that's bad, wait till the guy who controls this gets Parkinson's...
  53. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by billyj4 · · Score: 1

    ...only comes with one glove...

    Kinda like Michael Jackson....

  54. I guess it's settled... by Daytona89 · · Score: 1

    In tech, we often find ourselves referring to the Hollywood Operating System
    That's HOS for short. Compare it to the underwelming experience we have using our respective 'normal, every day' operating systems, which I will call Bitter Reality Operating Systems.
    Time and time again, our experiences with Windows, Macintosh and Linux don't live up to the glamorized HOS we see on TV. I guess it's settled then... HOS before BROS.

    1. Re:I guess it's settled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this post really deserves some more lovin, that is pretty damn awesome! Sorry I'm out of mod points :)

  55. Quasi-holographic gestural UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    You might find this interesting.

    Tovi Grossman, a grad student at UToronto, won best paper at UIST for developing a gestural, camera-based UI for actually building CAD models in a volumetric display from Actuality Systems. Click on the "video" for "Multi-finger gestural interaction with 3D volumetric displays."

    http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/~tovi/

  56. Add voice too. by headkase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As other posters have pointed out, it would be difficult to hold your arms up for extended periods. However, if paired with good voice recognition imagine mostly talking with occasionally moving/adjusting objects.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Add voice too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " As other posters have pointed out, it would be difficult to hold your arms up for extended periods."

      Why? Window washers do it for 8 hours a day. And we are talking about people in the military who have fitness requirements, not the average obese /.er munching on cheetos who gets a cramp reaching for their lcd power button.

  57. WMDs???? by psychgeek · · Score: 1

    Well I guess this explains it - somewhere there is a tank with 3 kidnapped american kids who had a nightmare about weapons of mass destruction.... Now if only GWB would let us get our hands on the "minority report" for that one (checks nervously over shoulder).....

  58. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    That's "on", not "with".

  59. Re:Thank God by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    Yeah! The back end was running PHP.

    Pretty Hot Psychic(s).

  60. You asked for it by T-Ranger · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Beowolf cluster of spider monkeys using these 21st century PowerGloves could do a better job then Bush.

    1. Re:You asked for it by modecx · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, their combined efforts could knock out Mike Tyson. What a bastard with that one punch knockout stuff. Let's see the prez do that!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:You asked for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but only by old Koreans in Soviet Russia... profit!

  61. look at it this way ... by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

    ... with the Minority Report user interface, all computer geeks will be as buff as Tom Cruise, and coffee in break rooms of software companies will be replaced by Gatorade.

  62. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it will feel SOOO good when you put it on!

  63. Minority Report Interface Strange by CodeBuster · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I seem to recall that during scenes in the film where the computer interface was being used the operators were physically passing back and forth what looked like large acrylic disks and inserting them into the drives. It was a strange dichotomy to see an apparently sophisticated interface coupled with such an archaic manner of data transport (i.e. sneaker net). It was as if the idea of local area network had not occurred to them (or perhaps not to the producers or set designers anyway).

    1. Re:Minority Report Interface Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that the fastest link is a car full of CDs.
      My friend at Rutherford Appleton labs phyically carries data between CERN and Oxford as it is faster than the internet.

      If the data contained in those disks in M.R was absurdly high, walking them would be faster than any network.

  64. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, at least with the Apple version you can surf porn without, well, you know, ruining your input device.

  65. LOLIVE OYL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omg roffle. yuo are funny!

  66. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

    That has got to be the absolute funniest thing I've ever heard on Slashdot! I applaud you, sir!

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
  67. Do we really need by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    the faggy hand gesture drama queen user interface?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    1. Re:Do we really need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooooooh! You go girl!!!

  68. Forget the military... by solios · · Score: 1

    ... when do we get the civilian version?

    I've wanted something like this (or at least the Power Glove) since I first used 3dStudio MAX in 1997. Using keyboard and mouse to manipulate 3d space? I kept wanting to reach into the monitor and spin the mesh around. Very frustrating.

    Seriously, the computer interface in Minority Report is probably the coolest damned thing I've ever seen in a movie, ever. First time CG has made my jaw drop since The Last Starfighter, and it did it by presenting a "proof of concept" of a system that will SERIOUSLY improve the way computers can be used.

  69. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    Come on! Any real Mac user could tell you that a five-fingered glove plugged into your USB port would work just fine!

  70. wild theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this what Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld have been doing for the president?

  71. Re:Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it backwards compatible?

  72. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    If a billboard scanned my iris, it'd be the last iris it ever scanned. EVAR. (I'm not the only one who feels that way, right?)

    --
    [o]_O
  73. Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the movie, they purposely made it something very physical and visual so the audience could follow it. (Not everybody who sees movies is a geeky slashdot regular.)

    Then again, a good interface is one that people can figure out, and I think it says something that people can easily figure out "drag onto this special platter, yank it out of this desk, plug it in that desk, drag it off the platter over there", even if they've never seen a computer or storage device that looked anything like that one.

    Even if there is a technically faster way, how many people will do it this way because it's less mental effort? Surely you've known people who've copied some files to a {floppy,CD-R,USB thumb drive} to put them on the machine 2 meters away, because it's less mental load. Even if the network is set up, putting some files off in a purely virtual place (you have to name it, remember where you put it, ...) takes more mental effort than putting them on a device you can hold in your hand.

    To access data on a (21st century) "floppy", you just need the floppy ("something you have"). To access data on a network, you need to know how/where to access it ("something you know"). Go read some Alan Kay stuff about the creation of the mouse: the mouse is great not just because it's efficient at pointing in 2 dimensions, but because it engages the physical/visual/spatial part of your brain. I hope creators of 21st century computers don't forget this lesson.

  74. Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An 8 inch, single sided floppy disk? Aaah, the memories - uhh, nightmares...

  75. As Lucas would say... by snuf23 · · Score: 1
    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  76. Elbows by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

    less so if you rest your elbows on the table. it's a lot like pottery, actually.

    --
    copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
  77. Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I remember that around the same time Minority Report came out there was an article (possibly on /.) about printing IC's on glass.

    My thought was that the big displays and the small "floppy disk" displays were the actual computing equipment, and that you could cut it into small squares and still have part of the computing capability. Joining squares would combine them into a more powerful device.

    You could measure the computing power in megaflops per square centimetre.

  78. How to do it at home by S3D · · Score: 1

    Well, you can implement cheaper and less robast hand-tracking camera system with little coding using open sourced Augmented reality system - ARToolkit. Put small ARToolkit markers on the gloves as described at this article (photo, and implement some gesture recognition (for example that one )

  79. How will this system work? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    New Scientist is reporting that a 'Minority Report' style interface is being developed by defense company Raytheon. Users don a pair of reflective gloves and manipulate images projected on a panoramic screen. A mounted camera keeps track of hand movements and a computer interprets gestures.

    Where will they get the pre-cogs from?

  80. Oh god ! that means a lot of *real* work by amberp · · Score: 1

    Moving a million files from place A to place B will really gonna be a tiring job.

    ...and I thought working on computers take the least about of *physical efforts* as compared to *most* other professions.

  81. Gorilla arms by wolfi · · Score: 1
  82. Martian Successor Nadesico by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

    I liked it even more when I saw it in the anime Martian Successor Nadesico long before...

  83. This is what I do at my work, but ours is better by bobbabemagnet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, we are implementing something we call the HI-Space table, which uses a camera to track hand motions as well. Ours doesn't need special gloves, though. You can walk up to the table and move your hands around and it watches any number of hands, doing any number of poses. It detects objects that are placed in the space and recognizes them if they are in the database. We have voice recognition, too, so it can respond to spoken commands.

    One of the best things about our system is that it is completely untethered and intuitive. There is no training period, and no device to put on. You are interacting with the digital world by manipulating in the physical world.

    I write applications for the table. There are a lot of issues that come up that you wouldn't normally think about. For example, with many hands in the space, it's easy to have people doing conflicting things. Actions are not so clearly defined, either. For example, when selecting a button, do you point to it? For how long? What if your finger moves a little?

    We are currently conducting user studies to see in what ways the HI-Space table is better than the desktop and cave environments, and we're looking for other applications and organizations interested in using this technology.

    http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/hispace//
    http://www.pnl.gov/infoviz/hces//

    contact me at bob [dot] baddeley [at] pnl [dot] gov

  84. Re:Do they also replicate the part of the interfac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stanley Kubrick was years ahead there by visualising computer hardware as glass-like slabs with no distinguishable metal portions, even for contacts. But of course he was aided by Arthur C. Clarke's brilliant innovative writing on the technology.

    Funny how a lot of our ideas for technology (spaceflight, submarines, helicopters, etc.) all came from non-tech-career people.

  85. Hand gesture control and unwanted ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the smart ads will recognise the hand gesture command for not interested (i.e. fsck off).

  86. oh come on, that has been around for ages... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the short description here on slashdot is misleading, but I've seen systems with motion tracking using special gloves myself more than 10 years ago. Here's a big list of such or similar products.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  87. gorilla arm by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    how soon they forget

  88. Billboards scanning irises by jimfrost · · Score: 1
    I dunno about scanning irises, but I do know that a lot of people are considering using the RF transmitter that almost everyone in the US carries (aka their cellphone) to target advertising and sales at them.

    It's been possible for a few years. The "hard" part is associating the cell phone's ID to the person, but the second you run a credit card through the cash register....

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
  89. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    further correction: a cast.

  90. Re:Big deal... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    you are such a pervert! Man, enough with the but licking jokes already.

  91. HoloPro Rear Projection Foil by Chase · · Score: 1

    I considered making a Minority Report style system using HoloPro Rear Projection Foil and one or two web cams.

    If you are wearing reflective gloves, it should be easy to track the gloves movements. Using two cameras you could track the distance the gloves are from the screen and decided if any action should be taken.

    I think this has already been done without the glove at some univerity somewhere.

    --
    -==-
  92. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er two mittens tied together by a string that you run through your coat sleeves.

  93. Re:This looks like a great recipe for an accident by Chase · · Score: 1

    Correction: a mitten.

    Correction: an iMitten

    --
    -==-
  94. Point and Click by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

    The first Point and Click user interface was a
    Colt .44

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
  95. Remember the gorilla arm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen.

    Gorilla Arm, according to Jargon

    It's not the same the situation in the Jargon entry, but the net effort would be similar. Human arms aren't meant to be waved around unsupported, making precise movements for long periods of time. Consider also that if it's held above your heart, it has to do more to pump your blood against gravity.

  96. One of the worst movies of all time by mabu · · Score: 1

    Of all the movies to reference technology from, Minority Report must be the worst. There were so many continuity errors in that film it would be hard to know where to begin. That movie, along with A.I. pretty much sealed Spielburg's coffin and convinced me that I'd never pay another penny to see one of his movies.

    I guess in the future, when you're a powerful law enforcement officer and you're fired, they don't bother to remove your computer security codes, which is what happened with Tom Cruise's character. He's breaking back into super-secure compounds with his access codes while he's a wanted man. I especially liked the scene where he carries around an eyeball in a zip-lok bag and it still manages to activate the retinal scanners. Worst movie ever!

  97. Ob. Bash Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <drmason> there was this one time I was wanking to porn...
    <drmason> ... I kept a javascript tutorial open in another window so my parents didn't start wondering why I was always on the desktop with no windows showing
    <drmason> so I'm just about to splurge when I suddenly hear my dad coming up the stairs
    <drmason> alt-tabbed to the other window and tried to pull my boxers up... computer stalled JUST THEN as my dad was opening the door
    <drmason> I just stood up and was like "fuck... dad this honestly isn't what it looks like"
    <drmason> and he glanced at the screen and said "I sure hope so because it looks like you're masturbating to a fucking javascript tutorial"

    Source: http://www.bash.org/?454203

  98. They should have learned from HP by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Years ago HP made a PC with a touch screen that wasn't successful. HP concluded that while a touch screen was a cool idea, people got tired holding their arms up so long.

  99. Conductors, violinists by funtime · · Score: 0

    Think about musicians who perform and practice for hours with their arms in the air. It's hell to begin with, but later on 5-7 hours a day is nothing (well, not nothing, but very doable).

  100. Obligatory Simpson Quote by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    "I predict that in 20 years, computers will be twice as fast, take up a football field and will be so expensive that only the 5 richest kings in the world will be able to buy them!" "Will they be used for dating purposes?" "Yes! Mahey! but they will be SO accurate, they will destroy humanity, as they take away the thrill of the chase."

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  101. Oh yeah, that reminds me by rpresser · · Score: 1

    See the Nouse "Use your nose as a mouse", also reported here a while back.