as a fattie i can assure you that yes, overeating AND lack of exercise are both causes, and you need to attack both at once, otherwise gains you make in one will be sabotaged by the other "i'm walking 2 miles every day, sure i can have that triple whopper"
the fact that surgically cicumventing your stomach so you can't eat too much works does nothing to disprove exercise as being useful and vital to healthy weight loss. eating nothing but vitamins and water will help you lose weight, but so will amputating both legs, that doesn't mean you will be much healthier, just smaller.
snow melts better from the bottom than from the top. when melting from the top the insulating properties keep the heat away altogether, heated from the bottom, the insulating effect can help because the heat under the snow is trapped by the snow so almost all of it is expended on the snow rather than dispersing into the environment, also water from melting snow does not fall away from the heat source, but rather sits on it and gets warmer as it flows down the surface of the dome, melting even more snow.
the problem is, there is no reliable way to measure that difference in the food we eat.
healthy choices about what to eat should be isolated from the control loop determining how much to eat, otherwise it is too easy to game your own wight loss system and convince yourself to go over because "they are HEALTHY calories"
The strategy i have found most successful is to use things like saturated fat content, amount of processing, etc. to decide what to buy when shopping, but use simple but unyielding calorie counting to decide how much to eat.
well to start with electrons and protons don't destroy each other. if they were somehow forced together and you threw in an anti-neutrino maybe you could force the reverse of a neutron decay and make them into a neutron, but first you would need to figure out how to force them all together and how to convince the quarks involved to shuffle identities.
so if it's even possible within the laws of physics it's probably at least a thousand years before we can do anything like that, and i don't see any reason to be doing it in the first place since it's pretty easy to find neutrons so why try to make them?
what is the terrorist afraid of? he wants to die for his cause, otherwise he wouldn't be using an airline bomb, and failure isn't much of a problem since a bomb going off in a crowded security checkpoint is less spectacular than in the air but it kills plenty of godless infidels(TM).
this will be co-opted as another weapon in the war on personal freedom in no time flat, since the 16 year old with a baggie of dope is going to be scared when a cop shows up.
the eee 700 and 900 series machines are a very robust and carry-frindly design. you can throw it into the pocket of cargo pants or a coat with no problem. try that with a 13" FailBookPro
more importantly, even if it did work well, it will always be cheaper to fire a cluster of tinfoil wrapped decoy estes style rockets with every real attack missile, then instead of a radar system that only has to look for "hot, fast, and metal" the system has to do target prioritization and discrimination in the same amount of time. add to that the fact that the type of incoming ordinance isn't known until detection and you have to discriminate two or more different signatures, analyze to see if they are a real threat, and then engage. while making sure not to accidentally judge amixed wave of 2 or more types of real rockets as rockets and decoys.
the lawsuit mentioned on the blog did not prevent development of NiMH batteries as claimed. it restricted sales in north america only and only till 2007 or 2010.
the negotiated terms did not have any bearing on the global market and looks a hell of a lot more like a battery division trying to make money off batteries and failing than it does any giant conspiracy.
if you are looking for wharrgble look no further than OP's blog link. from the front page
Saturday, October 10, 2009 Get the Hell Outta Dodge
What we want:
Public transit Free Health care Retirement for all Better pay More freedom Equality Good jobs
What we will get:
More highway construction Higher taxes Oppression Slavery Spying Fascism Kleptocracy
I am not the one making retarded claims and OP still hasn't provided any viable support to his claim.
SCART is/was crap. practically everything was optional on inputs, outputs, and cables. so being SCART doesn't mean a device will work with another SCART device.
Slashdot Mirror
maybe 1% of searches i do, probably even less than that.
as a fattie i can assure you that yes, overeating AND lack of exercise are both causes, and you need to attack both at once, otherwise gains you make in one will be sabotaged by the other "i'm walking 2 miles every day, sure i can have that triple whopper"
the fact that surgically cicumventing your stomach so you can't eat too much works does nothing to disprove exercise as being useful and vital to healthy weight loss. eating nothing but vitamins and water will help you lose weight, but so will amputating both legs, that doesn't mean you will be much healthier, just smaller.
snow melts better from the bottom than from the top. when melting from the top the insulating properties keep the heat away altogether, heated from the bottom, the insulating effect can help because the heat under the snow is trapped by the snow so almost all of it is expended on the snow rather than dispersing into the environment, also water from melting snow does not fall away from the heat source, but rather sits on it and gets warmer as it flows down the surface of the dome, melting even more snow.
the problem is, there is no reliable way to measure that difference in the food we eat.
healthy choices about what to eat should be isolated from the control loop determining how much to eat, otherwise it is too easy to game your own wight loss system and convince yourself to go over because "they are HEALTHY calories"
The strategy i have found most successful is to use things like saturated fat content, amount of processing, etc. to decide what to buy when shopping, but use simple but unyielding calorie counting to decide how much to eat.
well to start with electrons and protons don't destroy each other. if they were somehow forced together and you threw in an anti-neutrino maybe you could force the reverse of a neutron decay and make them into a neutron, but first you would need to figure out how to force them all together and how to convince the quarks involved to shuffle identities.
so if it's even possible within the laws of physics it's probably at least a thousand years before we can do anything like that, and i don't see any reason to be doing it in the first place since it's pretty easy to find neutrons so why try to make them?
forget a petition, if id wants to screw over PC gamers then a boycott of all id games and all games using technology licensed from id is in order.
it's a joke, the only effort expended was to shoop a shitload of buttons and a logo onto a mouse.
what is the terrorist afraid of? he wants to die for his cause, otherwise he wouldn't be using an airline bomb, and failure isn't much of a problem since a bomb going off in a crowded security checkpoint is less spectacular than in the air but it kills plenty of godless infidels(TM).
this will be co-opted as another weapon in the war on personal freedom in no time flat, since the 16 year old with a baggie of dope is going to be scared when a cop shows up.
Good luck doing that at 110V
you do realize that US electrical systems have 220(240) wiring as well don't you? as you mentioned, stoves and dryers are typically hooked up to them.
the eee 700 and 900 series machines are a very robust and carry-frindly design. you can throw it into the pocket of cargo pants or a coat with no problem. try that with a 13" FailBookPro
yes you can specify it as a condition of sale, before the sale.
not after the sale buried in fine print.
more importantly, even if it did work well, it will always be cheaper to fire a cluster of tinfoil wrapped decoy estes style rockets with every real attack missile, then instead of a radar system that only has to look for "hot, fast, and metal" the system has to do target prioritization and discrimination in the same amount of time. add to that the fact that the type of incoming ordinance isn't known until detection and you have to discriminate two or more different signatures, analyze to see if they are a real threat, and then engage. while making sure not to accidentally judge amixed wave of 2 or more types of real rockets as rockets and decoys.
untill someone breaks your hash algorithm, then every single record you have is useless
the negotiated terms did not have any bearing on the global market and looks a hell of a lot more like a battery division trying to make money off batteries and failing than it does any giant conspiracy.
if you are looking for wharrgble look no further than OP's blog link. from the front page
I am not the one making retarded claims and OP still hasn't provided any viable support to his claim.
you caould also have smaller booster caps that a service car can haul out in case a buz does get stuck somehow.
you visiting riots or something? I have never once seen a burning car at the side of the road
conspiracy blog = you fail.
if they do it every time then providing an example should be easy.
go fetch.
Ford just made my antenna sturdy enough to take a car wash
unless of course they come back mentally disturbed but not enough so that the VA will do much, and end up on welfare instead.
loans for purchasing furniture 18% wat? you mean like in-store financing? sounds like you would be better off taking out a personal loan.
it wasn't always like that, and still isn't if you go to a public college.
isn't "free market" privatization grand?
SCART is/was crap. practically everything was optional on inputs, outputs, and cables. so being SCART doesn't mean a device will work with another SCART device.
but NOD32 is superior so it's no great loss.
if the balls touch, we all die