3C is on the high side of estimates.
http://notrickszone.com/2017/1...
Most likely lower. However studies are all over the place about ECS.
One thing that seems to be consistent is the fact that as more studies are done, ECS seems to be trending downward.
2.0C being likely, but now on the high side of estimates as well.
I think this past year has had a long list of studies concerning confirmation bias in science. Right here on this website too.
- Cholesterol in food = Cholesterol in your arteries = heart disiease
https://www.researchgate.net/p...
One of the studies on Confirmation bias:
http://www.pnas.org/content/11...
The USA is an "enormous countries with large economies doing many many different things "...
Why one sided?
Treaty with no teeth or no treaty with no teeth, China and India will do what they want. They know that from here to 30-40 years ago, technology will solve these problems anyways, because they arent ideological idiots.
So, why would the USA stay in this non binding treaty and fork over tens of billions of dollars a year, so that the IMF can create monster useless projects and spread that wealth to their friends?
http://scientistswarning.fores...
1345 students (more because of language/spelling)
33 Veterinarians
96 Anthropologist
Not to mention the many names with no qualifications mentioned at all.
And this is after 5 mins skimming the surface of the list.
This list is a joke.
Its cute when you say nonsense like that. Doesn't make it true, but cute nonetheless.
The only places that renewable are making up a "large" percentage of energy needs, are places that do not use much energy to begin with, due to poverty or climate.
You need to be a dreamer with delusions of reality to believe those conditions can translate to industrialized countries.
I wish solar and wind was cheap and competitive, but alas, it is not. It is failing spectacularly, except in places where people are considered "rich" and the government gets to raise the cost of energy twofold or even more (i.e. Ontario, Germany, most of Europe or Minnesota which went from cheapest electricity on average in the USA to above the average in a few years).
Its all nice to be naive and have an ideology, but when you swallow lies wholesale, you need to seek help, because you have a problems.
The reason to pull out, was to send a message to the world, that the accord is bullshit, non binding, based on lies and a redistribution scheme so the world bank could skim money off of hundreds of billions of dollars of green projects.
You are delusional if you think anyone will "sidestep" the USA, the single biggest consumer market on the planet. I have a unicorn to sell you.
China has always been on track to have green energy. NUCLEAR, lots and lots and lots of NUCLEAR. They signed the agreement, because they want to sell chinese solar panels and they agreed to do NOTHING for 30 years, until their nuclear power plants come online.
You live in your green echo chamber. The rest of us live in the real world.
I never understood compensation plans that did not take into account profit.
Sales commission should be based on profit after expenses.
That takes care of all the problems mentioned above.
Sell a product or project at 35% margin, but turns out at the end to have only generated 22% margin, then your commission is a % of the end profit, not the sales revenue.
Besides, the lethal dose of Nicotine is most likely more around the 500 to 1000mg and not the 60mg in current litterature which is based on 19th century research and wrong, based on post mortem blood tests.
The thing is, this is probably also dependent on the individual.
There are many shows I would not have watched if not for binge watching. Many shows dont really grab my attention, (subject matter, long plot lines that seem to never end, etc..) however when watching them in quick succession back to back any "well told story" can become interesting to me.
How about a study with people who have jobs, kids and responsibilities and then see who enjoys binge watching vs waiting every week for the next episode.
Most people I know with busy lives actually just wait for the end of a season that plays weekly and then binge watch the whole season on a rainy day.
I know the parameters of the study are well identified in the article, but still, useless study is useless.
Slashdot Mirror
3C is on the high side of estimates. http://notrickszone.com/2017/1... Most likely lower. However studies are all over the place about ECS. One thing that seems to be consistent is the fact that as more studies are done, ECS seems to be trending downward. 2.0C being likely, but now on the high side of estimates as well.
Which success? https://www.nature.com/article...
Yes and the landlords have no power and cant get rid of bad tenants who dont pay.
I think this past year has had a long list of studies concerning confirmation bias in science. Right here on this website too. - Cholesterol in food = Cholesterol in your arteries = heart disiease https://www.researchgate.net/p... One of the studies on Confirmation bias: http://www.pnas.org/content/11...
The USA is an "enormous countries with large economies doing many many different things "... Why one sided? Treaty with no teeth or no treaty with no teeth, China and India will do what they want. They know that from here to 30-40 years ago, technology will solve these problems anyways, because they arent ideological idiots. So, why would the USA stay in this non binding treaty and fork over tens of billions of dollars a year, so that the IMF can create monster useless projects and spread that wealth to their friends?
India expects money. China is building coal plants for another 30 years. Your point is?
http://scientistswarning.fores... 1345 students (more because of language/spelling) 33 Veterinarians 96 Anthropologist Not to mention the many names with no qualifications mentioned at all. And this is after 5 mins skimming the surface of the list. This list is a joke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Because that is probably one of the worst videos I have seen targeting kids.
Heck we are already in a runaway warming situation, GISS temp data already proves it.
https://suyts.files.wordpress....
I agree.
You can add this one too. Its just basically the light blue line on the Nasa graph.
You can thank me later.
https://suyts.files.wordpress....
Just because they say so dors not mean its true.
Proof is needed.
If the state is required yo buy their electricity and "no less than" a certain price, its a subsidy. Wether they got money to build it or not.
Subsidies.
Major increases in energy costs.
Success?!?
Its cute when you say nonsense like that. Doesn't make it true, but cute nonetheless.
The only places that renewable are making up a "large" percentage of energy needs, are places that do not use much energy to begin with, due to poverty or climate.
You need to be a dreamer with delusions of reality to believe those conditions can translate to industrialized countries.
I wish solar and wind was cheap and competitive, but alas, it is not. It is failing spectacularly, except in places where people are considered "rich" and the government gets to raise the cost of energy twofold or even more (i.e. Ontario, Germany, most of Europe or Minnesota which went from cheapest electricity on average in the USA to above the average in a few years).
No
Its all nice to be naive and have an ideology, but when you swallow lies wholesale, you need to seek help, because you have a problems.
The reason to pull out, was to send a message to the world, that the accord is bullshit, non binding, based on lies and a redistribution scheme so the world bank could skim money off of hundreds of billions of dollars of green projects.
You are delusional if you think anyone will "sidestep" the USA, the single biggest consumer market on the planet. I have a unicorn to sell you.
China has always been on track to have green energy. NUCLEAR, lots and lots and lots of NUCLEAR. They signed the agreement, because they want to sell chinese solar panels and they agreed to do NOTHING for 30 years, until their nuclear power plants come online.
You live in your green echo chamber. The rest of us live in the real world.
You don't sell when you are not hungry.
I dont want sleazy sales men on my team, but I do want ambitious, hungry human beings who will go out there and hustle.
They are paid on profits though, not revenue. This prevents them from making slimeball deals and hurting the company in the long run.
I never understood compensation plans that did not take into account profit.
Sales commission should be based on profit after expenses.
That takes care of all the problems mentioned above.
Sell a product or project at 35% margin, but turns out at the end to have only generated 22% margin, then your commission is a % of the end profit, not the sales revenue.
The problem here is not the salespeople but your companies compensation plan.
Commission should be paid on margin, not on revenue. Thats just bonkers.
Sandy wasn't a hurricane when it made landfall.
Also, the only reason for the extensive damage was because it hit one of the most populated areas in the world.
No one forgot that it wasn't a hurricane when it made landfall.
You were right.
Besides, the lethal dose of Nicotine is most likely more around the 500 to 1000mg and not the 60mg in current litterature which is based on 19th century research and wrong, based on post mortem blood tests.
The thing is, this is probably also dependent on the individual.
There are many shows I would not have watched if not for binge watching.
Many shows dont really grab my attention, (subject matter, long plot lines that seem to never end, etc..) however when watching them in quick succession back to back any "well told story" can become interesting to me.
Seriously,
How about a study with people who have jobs, kids and responsibilities and then see who enjoys binge watching vs waiting every week for the next episode.
Most people I know with busy lives actually just wait for the end of a season that plays weekly and then binge watch the whole season on a rainy day.
I know the parameters of the study are well identified in the article, but still, useless study is useless.
Why?
Why must we put "extra" effort into convincing people to join a trade they did not want to join in the first place?
Be it:
Men in education and health
or
Women in CS/IT and construction
I see. You are being disengenuous.
Or you dont understand the complexity of the subject matter.
The earth ia not a closed system.
And CO2 IR blocking properties are logarithmic.
You pretending its simple and reducing the subject matter to a high school level science experiment means one of two things:
1. You are disengenuous or a liar;
2. You have no understanding of the subject matter.