Slashdot Mirror


Binge Watching TV Makes It Less Enjoyable, Study Says (vice.com)

According to new research by Jared Hovarth and his colleagues at the University of Melbourne, binging appears to diminish the quality of the television show for the viewer. From a report: This conclusion is based on a self-reported study incorporating 51 graduate and undergraduate students at the university, who were split into groups of 17 to watch a television show at different frequencies. One group watched the one-hour show on a weekly basis, another watched it on a daily basis, and another group consumed the first season of the show in one sitting, amounting to about 6 straight hours of TV. Each group was watching the highly acclaimed first season of the BBC Cold War-era drama The Game. The season consisted of six episodes, and none of the participants had previously seen the show. After finishing the season, all respondents filled out a questionnaire to gauge how well they understood the show. 24 hours later, they returned to the lab to take a retention quiz to see how well they could remember details from the show. As the researchers found, the mode of viewing had a significant effect on the study participants' ability to remember the show. For instance, binge-watchers had the strongest memory performance the day after watching the show, but this retention also had the sharpest decline over 140 days. Weekly viewers on the other hand, showed the weakest memory performance 24 hours after finishing the show, but also demonstrated the least amount of memory dilution over time.

139 comments

  1. File under by jofas · · Score: 1

    Stuff everyone already knows.

    1. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why do cable channels play the same TV show everyday? They don't want viewers to enjoy the show? Can't they license 5 shows for a time-slot instea of 1?
      OTA channels add a week's space between episodes. I prefer the latter spacing.

    2. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get so super smart bro? It's like you know EVERYTHING already

    3. Re:File under by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Stuff that most people suspect.
      However we came up with a process called Science, which collects data to show if our expectations match reality.
      We live our lives with a huge set of what we call "truths" that we actually haven't proven, or measured. We live and make decisions based on our biases, and often base off of experience from extremely poor sample sizes.

      For the most part we are able to live and be productive citizens with our untrue biases, and many of our unproven biases may actually be true as well. However if you are making decisions that can effect other people, putting your bias threw the scientific process, could be useful.

      The net enjoyability from binge watching would intuitively say would be less then watching the show once a day or once a week, as our expectation of the next show will increase in the enjoyability. While binge watching, will get rid of the expectation, and also make watching TV more of a chore as we must see what is next. But that is my personal feelings. However a study can show if this is true or not.

      This study brings up additional questions. If we find it less enjoyable then why do we do this. Are they other factors involved. What can be done to improve this?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:File under by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The study has a huge flaw. It just shows that people don't like to binge watch a show that they don't particularly like and weren't otherwise planning to watch.

      I have binged watch a few shows with my family. Most recently "Silicon Valley". I enjoyed it.

      Would I enjoy binge watching a random show that I was assigned to watch? Very unlikely.

      Also, the "binge" duration in the study was six hours. That may be too much even for a millennial. My typical binge session is about 3 hours.

    5. Re:File under by shaitand · · Score: 2

      There is nothing scientific about a sample set of one show and a mere 51 students that makes any sort of conclusion, let alone sweeping conclusions about all watchers and shows. The anecdotal experience of anyone who consumes television is more significant than this study.

    6. Re:File under by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They repeat the same show every day for a week so you don't need to be available at the exact same time every week. They don't release a new episode every day (unless it's a daily soap opera) or unless they're Netflix and encourage binge watching

    7. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However if you are making decisions that can effect other people, putting your bias threw the scientific process, could be useful.

      Jesus Christ learn to spell!

    8. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They repeat the same show every day for a week so you don't need to be available at the exact same time every week.

      But repetitive == more tedious. If you ate ice cream 5 days a week, it would be less fun after a few weeks than if you only ate it once a week. Besides, if people like the show enough, they will make arrangements to watch the show on a particular day. Cable TV forces you to binge watch ... that sucks.

    9. Re:File under by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      I disagree with you both your assessment and the "studies" reaching conclusion.

      The study proves (weakly) that users who binge watch a tv show can recall it for less time. That makes sense. However, I hate watching shows weekly. Those shows that aren't released a season at a time, I will DVR them for the season and only begin watching them when the season ends.

    10. Re:File under by ichimunki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only that, the headline misleadingly uses the word "enjoy", but the study clearly looked at memory/understanding of the show, not enjoyment. So all they REALLY showed was that memories created during a 6 hour binge are not as lasting as those created over multiple exposures. In fact, what this study shows is more relevant to learning than to anything to do with enjoyment of tv shows. If you have a critical test the next day, binge learning is possible and will hold well for 24 hours... but if you need to actually remember the material at a time after the test, you need to constantly review the material.

      If we MUST know how this study applies to TV shows, then what we learn is that binge watching a "season" of an annually released show will make it harder to follow the subsequent season because you've forgotten a lot. But that's what "Previously on [this show]..." recaps are for... and it would be helpful to study how well people did on these tests when shown a recap like that.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    11. Re:File under by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I would completely disagree. I enjoy binge watching far more than having it doled out in a prescribed dose on a weekly basis. But that's neither here nor there, since the summary would suggest that they weren't testing "enjoyability" in the first place.

      Rather, the researchers were testing retention, which is a wholly separate issue. Whether someone can remember an episode a week or two later is only weakly correlated to their enjoyment of it. My wife and I discovered The West Wing on Netflix maybe two weeks back. We're already most of the way through season 2 (despite Hurricane Harvey and a cross-country trip interfering with our binging), but the plot details for any given episode in season 1 have already faded quite a bit.

      Does that mean I didn't enjoy them? That I would have enjoyed them more if they were doled out over a longer period of time? Hardly. While it's not much of an issue in a primetime show like The West Wing, niche shows that are more subtle in their storytelling are far more enjoyable when binge watched, because, as the researchers noted, you're more capable of recalling details that you saw more recently, enabling you to pick up on or even simply recognize the cues and references far more capably.

      Plus, binge watching allows you to stay in the moment far better. For instance, I remember trying to keep up with a season of 24 in realtime by binge watching the entire season on a Saturday, and it was easily the most enjoyable way I watched any season of that show. When I watched episodes on a more sporadic basis it really pulled me out of the moment and made the show feel far less intense. It was, simply put, far less enjoyable. Even just watching 3-4 episodes at a time was better than one at a time, since it allowed the show to develop a cadence and rhythm.

      You'll hear people who are engrossed in a good book talk about physically experiencing the chills or blasts of heat described in the book's setting. I've never experienced that personally, but my dad told me about the one time he had that happen to him: when he was first learning to speed read. It kept him so in the moment that he experienced the book in a way that was completely unlike how he had ever experienced one prior, making an otherwise fairly mediocre novel far more enjoyable than it otherwise would have been.

      Binge watching is a similar sort of experience for most people, which, again, has very little to do with retention.

    12. Re:File under by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Not only that, the headline misleadingly uses the word "enjoy", but the study clearly looked at memory/understanding of the show, not enjoyment.

      Given the general quality of American television these days*, I'm tempted to hypothesize an inverse correlation between understanding a show and enjoying it.

      *There are exceptions, but they're few and far between.

    13. Re:File under by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not only that, the headline misleadingly uses the word "enjoy", but the study clearly looked at memory/understanding of the show, not enjoyment.

      The summary is not the article! They did measure how much the viewers enjoyed the show. Surprise: Those that watched it daily liked it the most, those that watched in a single day, the least.

    14. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you, but I am not gay. But you put things in their right place. No fuck off, and do it again with som other stuff, so I can love your comments/views again. Thank you. No I am not being sarcastic, I am being serious. I guess I am a rare breed nowadays. Thnx. I will go for a beer now. C U L8r.

    15. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind shows that are shown weekly, but it absolutely drives me nuts when they'll randomly skip weeks in the middle and then have seasons of unpredictable length.

      Fortunately, with DVR technology, it isn't as much of an issue as it used to be, but it's still rather annoying not knowing if you're going to have that weekly episode or not.

      Weekly shows are kind of nice because you can allow them to unfold without immediately seeing the next episode. Plus you don't have to set aside the time up front.

    16. Re:File under by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Read TFA then found the original study and it sure is damning on the enjoyment factor with the binge watchers. As reported.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    17. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tempted to hypothesize an inverse correlation between understanding a show and enjoying it.

      Someone has been watching Twin Peaks and enjoying it then?

    18. Re:File under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely sure of that.
      There have been shows that I might have enjoyed more if I didn't binge watch them.

      The problem with binge watching is that it becomes very obvious when the show lacks content or story and have episode after episode with fillers or pointless cliffhangers that aren't leading anywhere.
      If you don't binge watch this becomes less evident.

      You also get the issue of reusing. A lot of times show rehash the same style of events a couple of times. If you binge watch those are still in fresh memory.
      "Going down to unknown planet and red-shirt dies" works a lot better if you didn't just watch five episodes with that the same day.

      There is also the issue of writer strike style "recalling past events"-episodes. If it is events from last season that you haven't watched in a year it might be enjoyable. If you binged that season yesterday it is just the same crap over again.

      Binge watching doesn't ruin a good show, but it makes it a lot harder to pretend that a bad show is acceptable.

    19. Re:File under by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The big thing with watching a season in one sitting is continuity. Basically they often break the story they were telling to tell this particular weeks particular plot work. The arch old question, what is the speed of warp, why, it is the speed of plot and warp speed slows down and speeds up according to this week particular plot. This sort of stuff really screws with the entire story when watched one episode after another, not so bad a week apart, but when minutes apart, really story breaking. Lazy writers not bothering to check and just spew out this weeks story at a budget and the spend more on the muppets in the story than in the story itself and that makes for bad story telling and a lot of WTF moments when you watch one episode after another.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:File under by Xest · · Score: 1

      Don't really give a shit what the study claims to find, I've always found binge watching preferable and found shows I've binged watched consistently more memorable.

      It's because when you have to wait a week, or in some cases, even wait a month (i.e. shows like Arrow which they drag each series out over about 9 months) I just stop giving a shit, and I'm just not invested in the storyline anymore by the time the next episode comes around.

      The great thing about binge watching is that you can enjoy the story from start to finish without interruption, you don't forget anything about what's going on, or forget who a character is or what they were upto. You get the full story experience because everything flows nicely together without interruption and that's lost when there is too big a gap between episodes.

      I've even watched shows piecemeal as and when episodes have come out then binge watched a middle or final portion, and I've always found the binge watched portions to be the best bit for exactly this reason. Similarly I only got into Game of Thrones by binge watching it and the seasons I watched week by week were the ones that just weren't memorable for me, so I always wait until the whole lot are out now so I can actually enjoy the story and not lose track of the billion different characters.

      This is just another of those nonsense studies, performed by one of the many people who do studies but don't even have a basic grasp of how to reach valid conclusions and just find what they want to find which seem to be rife in "popular science" nowadays. 51 students is hardly a meaningful or representative sample, especially as we already know ability to concentrate, learn, and focus varies wildly throughout the population based on things like age, diet and so forth.

      I imagine SOME people don't like binge watching as much, and I imagine SOME people like it more. I imagine SOME people have a happy medium whereby a new episode say every day would be ideal.

      But the idea that ALL of us like shows we've binge watched less than shows we've not binged watched is patently false as I'm absolutely not in that category whatever this fucking study purports to find.

      This is just someone pulling a completely unrepresentative tiny sample together, finding a correlation and jumping to an entirely unjustifiable conclusion on it. It's not even science, it's just pure drivel.

    21. Re:File under by EricTDuckman1414 · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Binge watching can highlight the faults in a show, faults that you might forget about if you have to wait a week between episodes and a year or more between seasons. For example, when I watched the Battlestar Galactica reboot as it aired originally, I didn't take the religious components seriously, and was pissed when they ended it the way they did. A few years later, I binge watched it over a week or so and realised that the religiosity that I had just considered part of the background culture of the society being portrayed in the show was actually the writers engaging in a long drawn out Deus ex machina.

    22. Re:File under by tattood · · Score: 1

      Given the general quality of British television these days*, I'm tempted to hypothesize an inverse correlation between understanding a show and enjoying it.

      The show in the study was from the BBC. FTFY.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    23. Re:File under by SandWyrm · · Score: 1

      Aren't both groups just falling back to the mean of what someone is likely to remember about a show? It's just that the binge watchers start from a higher level of retained short-term knowledge before their brains complete the process of saving the most important/distinct (to them) impressions to long-term memory, and discarding the rest.

    24. Re:File under by jowifi · · Score: 1

      What's missing from the summary (didn't read the article) is what the actual retention was on the retest. Binge watchers started high and lost a lot. Weekly watchers started low and lost a little. Where did the two groups end up relative to each other?

  2. Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by cbeaudry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously,

    How about a study with people who have jobs, kids and responsibilities and then see who enjoys binge watching vs waiting every week for the next episode.

    Most people I know with busy lives actually just wait for the end of a season that plays weekly and then binge watch the whole season on a rainy day.

    I know the parameters of the study are well identified in the article, but still, useless study is useless.

    1. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by swb · · Score: 1

      It may have useful applications or suggest further research in more meaningful topics like education.

      It seems like there's always a lot of push to cram information down people's throats (the bootcamp mentality) in a short time period. If this results in people who learn less and/or have less long term proficiency, maybe it will suggest better learning/education strategies.

    2. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

      On average, American adults watch five hours and four minutes of television per day. That doesn't sound like most people just watching on a rainy day. It would seem that your own experience and those you know, don't represent the majority of Americans.

    3. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite that study and I'll bet we can find it's bias as well. I don't know anyone who watches five hours of TV a day.

    4. Re: Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they study television instead of education if this was the case?

    5. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Most people learn by doing, not by listening/watching. This means modern schools with a teacher at the front blabbing for hours and students taking notes is just bullshit.

      Shop class - I mean "Industrial Arts" class? That's the proper way to teach.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite that study and I'll bet we can find it's bias as well. I don't know anyone who watches five hours of TV a day.

      Yeah, is this number propped up by hospital patients, the unemployed, and the elderly? Who the hell finds that much time to just watch TV every day?

    7. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might as well claim that binge reading at the night before tests leads to bad long term educational accomplishments.

    8. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      less enjoyable is still enjoyable.

      For the people who have jobs and kids, would probably enjoy more being able to watch the show once a week, however other factors means this isn't convenient, so they will compromise on the less enjoyable route. As the trade off of getting fired, or put in jail just to watch a TV show is too high compared to binge watching it later for less enjoyability.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      The thing is, this is probably also dependent on the individual.

      There are many shows I would not have watched if not for binge watching.
      Many shows dont really grab my attention, (subject matter, long plot lines that seem to never end, etc..) however when watching them in quick succession back to back any "well told story" can become interesting to me.

    10. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I suspect the 'less enjoyable' part comes from not watching as part of the communal 'water cooler' experience. Sure, you don't get to discuss the latest episode with your friends and argue over the cliff hanger at the end of last night's episode.

      But... You don't have to deal with annoying cliff hangers, and you get the added bonus of spotting the obvious places for commercial breaks that are missing when you stream it. The first program I binge watched was 'Lost' - several years after the series concluded. I enjoyed it immensely - and all the while, I thought to myself that if I had to deal with all the commercial breaks and wait a week for all the cliff hangers to be resolved, I would've hated that show. And the lousy last season would've made me even angrier...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    11. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by shaitand · · Score: 1

      What does education have to do with a subjective measure of enjoyment from different methods of consuming television? Seems like a pretty giant leap. It also isn't a statistically significant study with only one program and two tiny groups of watchers.

    12. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by DogDude · · Score: 0

      Jesus, people with kids never stop whining about their decision, do they?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    13. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by shaitand · · Score: 2

      "On average, American adults watch five hours and four minutes of television per day."

      I'm highly skeptical of this statistic, especially if you control for the retired/elderly/unemployed. Not to mention controlling for the biggest consumer, people who leave the TV on whether they are watching it or not. We put the TV on for noise when we go to sleep and definitely aren't the only ones, that is 8hrs a day that nobody is really watching TV.

      But if I watch 16hrs of binge TV on Sat/Sun that is an average of 2.2hrs/day without any other watching at all. If you follow sports that is at least another 0.75hrs/day.

    14. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by shaitand · · Score: 0

      Don't forget people just leaving the TV on while they go about other activities in the house or even to go to sleep at night. In 8hrs of TV play time a house wife might WATCH 5mins of TV.

    15. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American adults watch five hours and four minutes of television per day

      Wow, that's a lot, especially in a country famous for its long work hours.

    16. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average isn't the same thing as "tehre are a lot of people like that".
      The air force learned this when they designed cocpits to fit the average pilot and it turned out none of their pilots were actually average and the cockpit was juts uncomfortable for everybody in different ways leading to adjustable cocpits in later designs.

      Similarly a married couple, who watch an hour of TV togeher, the husband watches an hour of news while the wife prepares dinner, and the wife watches soaps for 8 hours while her husband is at work averages to 5 hours even though neither of them actually watched 5 hours precisely.

      With more realistic use cases you get people who spend 12 hours watching sports on the weekend, people who are bedridden and watch TV all day, people who watch no TV and people who watch an hour or three a day all mixed together and the aggregate average is representative of very few of them.

    17. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I leave the TV on so the dog has some background noise while I'm gone during the day. My wife falls asleep with the TV on almost every evening. I'll let her sleep in the recliner chair until I go to bed and if I turn the TV off she will wake up.

      If hulu was trying to average that into a metric it would be rather deceiving because I know I'm not the only one that leaves the TV on all day for their pets or leaves the TV on in the evening when they go out to give the appearance that someone is home.

    18. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How about a study with people who have jobs, kids and responsibilities and then see who enjoys binge watching vs waiting every week for the next episode.

      Oh you (almost) described me. I say almost because I'm working in a shutdown cycle at the moment so I have a 56hour workweek instead of the usual 40 hour week.

      I also binge watched all of Steins Gate this past weekend.

      Maybe you need better personal time management, or maybe you have that but don't think binge watching something is good use of your personal time. I do, so I made time for it.

    19. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I can't sleep in absolute silence. It magnifies and makes jarring every little sound the house makes or worse, cues my brain that it's think time. Some people use a fan, for me it is the bedroom TV. Just kick on House or some other show with lots of episodes I've seen a million times so I won't get "interested" and I'm out in no time.

    20. Re:Students have time to watch TV (Says study...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha so true, always feel like I'm a lesser citizen because I chose not to have kids.

  3. Correction by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Watching TV makes it less enjoyable

  4. Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because we will drop the sub after we watch the one show they have we want.

    The rest of this study is irrelevant and honestly doesn't ring true. When a show is spread out too long I tend to lose much of the plot points due to other things going on in between. I tend to stop caring about some shows I might otherwise finish up. Possibly the last part of that sentence is the key point: when binge watching I might watch a show I'd ordinarily decide to give up on because it got stupid. When they're spaced a week apart I will just not bother to go back.

    1. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is laughable anecdata, thanks for sharing.

    2. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Because we will drop the sub after we watch the one show they have we want.

      The rest of this study is irrelevant and honestly doesn't ring true. When a show is spread out too long I tend to lose much of the plot points due to other things going on in between. I tend to stop caring about some shows I might otherwise finish up. Possibly the last part of that sentence is the key point: when binge watching I might watch a show I'd ordinarily decide to give up on because it got stupid. When they're spaced a week apart I will just not bother to go back.

      Alternately:
      When a show is spread out I have time to dwell on plot points a few days between viewings, that gives the corresponding events more significance and makes the show as a whole more enjoyable. The choice to binge watch isn't a reasoned decision so much as a failure of delayed gratification.

      Not sure which is true, but I'm not convinced anecdotes can solve this one.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a show is spread out too long I tend to lose much of the plot points due to other things going on in between

      Just say it. "When there is too much damned filler." There, doesn't that feel better?

    4. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by tepples · · Score: 1

      Because we will drop the sub after we watch the one show they have we want.

      Until the service realizes this and jacks up the month-to-month rate.

    5. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Anecdotes versus trusting that a study was done without letting money motives for the purposes of finding truth cancel each other out. The only possible reason to study this is because someone wanted a conclusion, chances are they got what they paid for.

    6. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we will drop the sub after we watch the one show they have we want.

      The rest of this study is irrelevant and honestly doesn't ring true. When a show is spread out too long I tend to lose much of the plot points due to other things going on in between. I tend to stop caring about some shows I might otherwise finish up. Possibly the last part of that sentence is the key point: when binge watching I might watch a show I'd ordinarily decide to give up on because it got stupid. When they're spaced a week apart I will just not bother to go back.

      I don't cancel subscription services after a single show finishes airing and many others don't as well. If a service only has one show then you shouldn't be subscribing at all, really. Just buy the show, watch it with friends or pirate it. It may seem counter-intuitive but the absolute worst thing you can do is cancel a sub service after only a month or two over and over. All that will result in is them eventually raising the monthly price and maybe offering a discount on annual subscriptions or maybe making it contractually annual.

      What everyone should be doing is subscribing to the services you want to back and keep subscribing, then find an alternative means for GoT if that's all you want HBO for. We're in phase 2 of fixing the entertainment industry. This phase consists of every content producer thinking they need their own distribution service for people to subscribe to with 90% of the content garbage. Most of these are going to fail because people don't want to subscribe to and shuffle between that many services. They're just trying to replace traditional tv with a streaming clone but that's doomed because it still misses the point about what people want.

    7. Re:Binge watching is bad for subscription services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotes versus trusting that a study was done without letting money motives for the purposes of finding truth cancel each other out. The only possible reason to study this is because someone wanted a conclusion, chances are they got what they paid for.

      Money or not, n=51 is pretty "laughable" already. I can gather more data at the water cooler if I ask enough people the right questions.

  5. Binge Watching *This Particular* Show ... by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    Try that across multiple different types of shows: Historical realism, comedy, fantasy, action, etc. Was the show created for broadcast or is it a Netflix original?

    This is an interesting finding, but not conclusive of anything yet.

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:Binge Watching *This Particular* Show ... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I found if I am watching the Classic Doctor Who episodes, I can only handle 1 episode a day. Binge watching these get tedious, because I am waiting for a resolution while I am just getting more talking, the bad guys explaining their plans. For the once a day viewings this actually allows me to absorb what is going on, while binge watching, I am just waiting for the action.

      Other shows, I can watch one after an other, because there is a lot going on, and over time puzzle pieces are being placed.

      It is akin to a good dessert vs. candy. A good dessert is very rich and you can only have a small piece and you are satisfied and you have enjoyed it. While Candy you can keep on eating it, until you have a stomach ache and while you have enjoyed it, you are wanting more until you start feeling pain.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Binge Watching *This Particular* Show ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used mod points, so AC. Longmire is the best example I have for this, when it was broadcast TV it was much better with every episode being self contained with a little overarching plot and a good hook or powerful ending to make you want more. When it went to Netflix the overarching plot got more complicated but the per episode plot and bite at the end went missing since they didn't need it anymore. Overall I found it to be less of a "I need to see the next episode" and that was disappointing.

    3. Re:Binge Watching *This Particular* Show ... by mccalli · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting comment which I'd not really thought of. The classic Doctor Who was broadcast weekly, on Saturday evenings. The extra talking there is now the kind of thing you often see with "Previously on ..." pre-credit stuff. It's to remind your audience what's happening and keep them with you.

      Agreed, doesn't translate well to binge-watching at all. Leads to an interesting question - will we start to see new programmes which are structured specifically for binge-watching?

  6. Doing anything by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Doing anything makes it less enjoyable. You just keep moving on.

  7. Weak Argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small sample size leads to poor generalization

    1. Re:Weak Argument by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      That's the worst thing you saw in the study?

      1 day after binge watching, you're testing their memory on details from yesterday. 1 day after the weekly group, you're asking them the same questions about details from 36 days ago. Do you remember details of a show you watched over a month ago as well as what you saw last night?

      The whole study is fatally flawed.

  8. But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been able (or willing) to sit and watch my favorite show every week since I was a kid. Now, granted I don't care that much about TV anymore, but if it wasn't possible to binge watch TV shows, then I wouldn't be watching anything at all.
    I just have so many other things going on. I can't imagine actually telling my wife or kids, "my show comes on at 8pm, I need to see this". Actually, I can't imagine even thinking that, let alone behaving that way.

    1. Re:But that's not the issue by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When I was kid growing up on the Big Three (ABC, CBS and NBC), dinner was done at 6PM because the evening news started at that time. My mother would stay up to watch the late news at 11PM. I would sneak downstairs to watch The Benny Hill Show on Friday nights and Creature Features on Saturday nights. Back then, TV was religion and every room had a TV.

    2. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear people,

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a creimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      -Nancy Guerrero

    3. Re:But that's not the issue by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Back then, TV was religion and every room had a TV.

      Err...pretty much every room still has a TV??

      I mean, I do...and in general I pretty much always have at least one TV on in the house, depending on the room I"m in. If I"m moving between rooms regularly for something I"ll likely have at least 2 televisions on at any given time.

      Don't most people...?

      I don't know that I have hardly ever visited a friend's house and there not been a TV on.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:But that's not the issue by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      Err...pretty much every room still has a TV??

      This isn't the 1970's anymore. Hardly anyone has a TV for the toilet, bathroom, bedrooms, living room, family room, kitchen and garage. If you lived out in the country, one for the outhouse as well.

      Don't most people...?

      A lot of my friends in Silicon Valley have a giant TV in the living room. If they have kids, a smaller TV in the family room.

    5. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of this. Most people I know own a TV, but if they're in other rooms looking at a screen it's a phone or tablet or laptop (my Millenial wife will watch shows on one of these, even if she is sitting in front of the TV).

      Of course it varies by person and trends by age, but studies show there's less 3+ TV houses now.

    6. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average American home now has 2.93 TV sets per household, up from 2.86 sets per home in 2009, the largest year-over-year increase since 2006 according to Nielsen’s latest Television Audience Report (see chart above). In 2010, the number of U.S. homes with three or more TV sets increased to the highest percentage ever at 55% (up from 54% last year and up from 11% in 1975) and the number of households with only one TV decreased to the lowest level ever, at 17%, down from 18% last year, and down from 57% in 1975. The report also finds that the number of people per TV home has held steady at about 2.54 for the last six years, carrying on the trend of more TVs per home than people.

      (Source)

      Sorry, you were busy regaling us with stories of how every home had 6-10 tv sets back in the day? Don't let the facts get in your way, creimer. In 1975, 57% of households had only one tv. Only 11% had 3 or more. That means 32% had 2 tvs, or 0 tvs. Which means that only 11% of househoulds *could* have had televisions in every room as you claim, and only if those houses had VERY small numbers of rooms. In reality, you're full of shit, reminiscing about a time that never existed.

    7. Re:But that's not the issue by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      In reality, you're full of shit, reminiscing about a time that never existed.

      You're citing the national average. A lot people in Silicon Valley had a lot of TVs in the 1970's. My family had six TVs. One neighbor ran a TV repair shop out of his garage and had several hundred older TVs available for sale.

    8. Re: But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because you are a fucking pussy. Grow a pair of fucking balls man. If there is a show you want to watch, man the fuck up, tell the old ball and chain to deal with it. If you can't carve out an hour of your time for something you enjoy because of the wife, then you are a fucking pussy whipped, scared little bitch. And this applies to anything not just watching TV. And if the wife wants to carve out an hour of her time to watch a show, then she should be able to do that without the family falling apart. You as a husband should be able to handle the kids for 1 fucking hour. Christ.

      I mean seriously.

    9. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVR and On Demand and even streaming allow you to do what you say you can't. I can easily find an hour a week to watch a show rather than 16-20 hours for a season to binge on in a day or two.

    10. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn you are stupid The fact that a TV repairman had a lot of TVs has NOTHING to do with a regional average.

    11. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you understand creimer has no interest in rational discourse, and indeed is not even capable of such, he becomes a source of entertainment.

      Nothing he says has value otherwise.

    12. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're citing the national average.

      And you're citing nothing but your fond anecdotal remembrances of a world that never existed. In a rational discussion, guess which one gets more weight?

      Even if Silicon Valley had twice the national rate of 3+ tv ownership, that would mean 1 in 4.5 households (22%) had "more than 3 tvs." Of those, some significantly smaller percentage would have "a tv in every room, plus one in the outhouse" - that's a lot more than "3 or 4 tvs" unless you really are saying that the average home has 4 or less rooms, when you include bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchens, dining rooms, family rooms, and outhouses. The houses with a "tv in every room" were in no way even approaching a majority; they weren't even approaching a largeish minority, even in this golden-hued Silicon Valley you seem to think existed once upon a time.

      A lot people in Silicon Valley had a lot of TVs in the 1970's. My family had six TVs. One neighbor ran a TV repair shop out of his garage and had several hundred older TVs available for sale.

      My neighbor runs a small engine repair business. He has many rebuilt lawnmowers, snowblowers, leaf blowers, hedge trimmers, string trimmers, power washers, generators, and other small engine tools for sale. Therefore, it's reasonable to conclude that everybody owns a lawnmower for every day of the week, and a snowblower for every week of the winter!

      Do you see how dumb it sounds when I do it? Yet it's exactly what you just did: you posited some deep insight into averages across a region based on your neighbor, who would - obviously even to someone with a box of rocks for a head - be an outlier of epic proportions when it comes to television ownership.

    13. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're citing the national average.

      And what are you citing when you proclaim:

      Back then, TV was religion and every room had a TV

      You lying swine.

    14. Re:But that's not the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. This is fine by bahwi · · Score: 1

    I want to enjoy TV as much as I want to enjoy it, not as much as some marketing company wants me to enjoy it. I'd rather binge, and not feel some desperate need to watch and obsess over the next episode every day of the week. I have work to do, and winter is coming, literally; I'd like to enjoy the outdoors while I can.

    Why is everything that isn't a cocaine-like addiction presented as a problem?

    1. Re:This is fine by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Because to marketers and corporations, it is....

    2. Re: This is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      winter is coming

      I saw what you did there

    3. Re:This is fine by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Results: Control Group - Watch one episode a week for 6 weeks

      Did you like the show? Yes
      Did you like the show more on the 6th episode more than on the first episode? I don't remember.
      What did you think of the subplots? I don't remember.
      Then why did you say you liked the show? Because after viewing just one episode, the next day I could talk about it with my co-workers around the watercooler.

      Results: Binge Group - Watch all 6 episodes consecutively

      Did you like the show more on the 6th episode more than on the first episode? It was interesting to see how the plot and characters progressed.
      What did you think of the subplots? The subplots were woven intricately and with fine precision, which made for a better viewing experience.
      Did you like the show? Meh.

    4. Re: This is fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure my cat saw what he did there.

  10. from Captain Obvious Labs by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    This seems pretty obvious. I (occasionally) like bingeing chocolate, but the first chocolate bite is always better than the last. Same with cheeseburgers and porn (no connection there, don't force one in snarky jokes).

    1. Re:from Captain Obvious Labs by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      I didn't know George Costanza had a slashdot account.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:from Captain Obvious Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George even bought a 5-digit ID.

  11. C- C- CATCH THE WAVE! by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Damn blipverts erase your memory of the show when you bingewatch.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  12. Ah no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I don't binge watch some programs, I lose interest. Meaning, if I have to wait a week to see something I'm not that interested in, I'll forget about it.

    Example, Star Trek Voyager. I didn't see the whole series until I streamed it - when I was out of work and bored shitless.

    When I had a life? Pfft. Not worth it. There are quite a few others like that.

    1. Re:Ah no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a Voyager hater, but the thought of binge watching that series is depressing. Bored shitless indeed.

      But binge watching B5? Love to try that, if I still had the time for TV. Would be different than taping for hours overnight just to hope you caught UPN's latest random time shift of B5 from 1:30am to 2:48am.

  13. misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does retention have to do with enjoyment.
    More over these retention numbers are what would be predicted by many other studies on memory that support shorter study periods and frequency as ways of boosting retention.

    1. Re:misleading title. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Beyond that, I watch shows for enjoyment. Rarely do I even want to retain the plot of a movie/show 140 days in the future.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:misleading title. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly this. As far as I can tell, they're not measuring "enjoyment" at all!

      And given they're actually measuring retention, then of course binge-watching lowers retention levels. Duh! But I suppose that's so obvious that it wouldn't get funding... so they had to pretend they were measuring something else.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does retention have to do with enjoyment.

      Obviously lower retention will result in more enjoyment because you can binge watch the same series another time and enjoy it all over again.

    4. Re:misleading title. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Since the title of this Slashdot post is the only place "enjoy" occurs, the authors of the study probably didn't have to pretend anything. And since this is Slashdot, I doubt the change in focus from retention to enjoyment is anything other than a mistake.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    5. Re:misleading title. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      What does retention have to do with enjoyment.

      Read the article. Both things were measured. Two results from the same study.

    6. Re:misleading title. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. As far as I can tell, they're not measuring "enjoyment" at all!

      I know reading is hard and all:

      Moreover, the researchers found that on all three follow-up questionnaires, binge watchers reported enjoying The Game "significantly less" than those who watched it on a weekly or daily basis. Overall, those who watched the show daily reported the greatest amount of enjoyment over time.

      And given they're actually measuring retention

      It's amazing that when using a questionnaire you can actually ask more than one question at a time, such as measuring retention and then asking about enjoyment.

    7. Re:misleading title. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What does retention have to do with enjoyment.

      Nothing, which is why they separately asked about retention and enjoyment in different questionaires.

    8. Re:misleading title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. As far as I can tell, they're not measuring "enjoyment" at all!

      And given they're actually measuring retention, then of course binge-watching lowers retention levels. Duh! But I suppose that's so obvious that it wouldn't get funding... so they had to pretend they were measuring something else.

      I'm not sure what you're angry about, do you think you could explain it a bit more please?

  14. Binge + anything != better?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I thought binging showed the healthy behavior of well-adjusted college students. . .

  15. So, it's like anything else. by sandbagger · · Score: 1

    Cheese cake, smoked meat or lesbian porn.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
  16. Ice cream conundrum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all lean this as 5 yr olds. Or should. A scoop of ice cream is good fun. A whole tub of it in one sitting is not so fun. Duh. All things in moderation.

  17. Memorable or enjoyable? by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

    This just proves you remember things better if you spend more time thinking about them. The title is irrelevant to the summary.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  18. Try the study with commercials by mordred99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would like to see this study re-done with commercials. So they picked a British TV show, presumably with the British style TV (no commercials until the end of the show). Give me an American style show, with 33% or more commercials in an hour and I bet you will get totally different results. This is why streaming and binging are huge in the US, as people can absorb the content, with out the BS Marketing.

    1. Re:Try the study with commercials by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      British TV shows have 6 episodes, much easier commitment to run through an entire series. American TV shows are maybe 12-20 episodes per season.

      Personally I only binge to catch up on a newly discovered gem, and then watch episodes of various shows here and there on rotation when I am caught up to make it last until next season.

  19. Canceling a TV show I'm watching is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm sick and tired of watching shows and then they get canceled after 7 episodes, after one and a half season, at the end of a season when the creators didn't have a chance to wrap things up.

    This is the reason I binge watch most shows....mainly because I know what I can trust about it.

    Binge watching is less enjoyable because it is no longer a "shared" experience with friends and family...but whatever. Having shows canceled underneath me more times than I can count has driven me to this.

  20. Binge-watching is still rational. by Seor+Jojoba · · Score: 1

    There's no shortage of good content. Maybe if you watch a whole season of House of Cards in one sitting, you won't enjoy it as much as if you'd watched it spread out. But since you can immediately find other shows of similar quality to watch, then maximizing your viewing hedonism is done by binging. The limiting factor is just your time and how much of it you want to spend glued to a TV screen. If there is one thing in the world that I have no worries about, it's the entertainment industry's ability to feed us delicious screen candy.

    1. Re:Binge-watching is still rational. by epine · · Score: 1

      If there is one thing in the world that I have no worries about, it's the entertainment industry's ability to feed us delicious screen candy.

      Regardless of metaphorical form, candy eventually rots your soul.

      I've actually taken to watching classics from the tongue-tied and psychologically bomb-sheltered 1950s (my least favourite film era) rather than the superhero man panties that Hollywood now cranks out (sorry ScarJo, this doesn't even count as film—it's a lot closer to a Gold's Gym cosplay pizza delivery service, with a looped soundtrack from Jurassic Park: Bottle Return Depot).

      I have a list of over 600 movies I've seen and another list of nearly 400 I haven't seen, of which only 10% are Ewok-on-a-stick Chocolate Factory blockbusters.

      In a properly balanced media diet, every original Iron Man (one of the few bling movies I actually enjoyed) is offset by Grave of the Fireflies and Letters from Iwo Jima.

  21. Memory or Enjoyment? by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    Not sure what they were studying, but if you tied yourself to a chair with rough rope or heavy chains, then watch TV nonstop... you won't enjoy it as much. Repeat this a few times and you also will probably get vein problems in your legs, less muscle mass, higher body fat, weaker lungs, cooties, the uglies and who knows what else. People, for fucks sake stop sitting in front of a TV for a quarter of a day at a time!!!!

    1. Re:Memory or Enjoyment? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      People, for fucks sake stop sitting in front of a TV for a quarter of a day at a time!

      Not me! I walk around while binge watching Netflix on an AR headset!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  22. Re: Binge watching is bad for subscription service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 groups of 17 students each is pretty close to anecdotal.

  23. Another worthless study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only too much time on their hands to binge watch, but also to do stupid studies about it.

  24. Of course by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    And binge watching porn makes you more tired.

    News at 11.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Binge watching from DVD/BluRay is the best way by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    No commercials and I can watch as many episodes as I feel like which is usually 1 or 2 a night. I get the videos from my local library so there's no cost involved although there is the occasional damaged video. That's pretty rare, however. I did this for all the recent great shows like Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Sopranos, The Wire, and House of Cards. The only problem is that is can take several months to work through all the seasons of a show and watching the same thing for that long gets a bit stale even if the show is a great one. I'm at the start of Season 4 of House of Cards and have reserved searson 5 which is on order now.

    In any case, binge watching these programs beats pretty much anything on live today.

  26. said the study done by a cable company probably by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    no ads, done on my time, no week long annoyances of finding out what happens next only to miss the first half because of a wreck on the highway on the way home from work. oh yeah and netflix finally has a skip intro button. all these things that make binge watching less enjoyable. rofl.

  27. Who has time to "binge"? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I have a full-time job. I do plop in my chair after work, but that's a max of 3 or 4 hours, and I usually divide that between TV, internet, and futzing around the house. I might finish off 2 one-hour shows, and it's not unusual for me to not finish 1 one-hour show.

    Weekends are variable. I might have more time, but I also have plenty to do, especially during good weather. There will probably be crap days this winter when there's nothing better to do than veg out watching the tube, but usually my TV time is limited.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  28. And they call this a "Study?" by bwanagary · · Score: 1

    Lol.

  29. Stupidity at a new level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a load of crap. Seriously ! WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED HERE ? That people who are made to watch and remember something over a long period of time are more likely to remember it for a longer time ? THERE IS NO SURPRISE ! Whoever came up with the idea to research this question is a waster of oxygen and water.

  30. Yes yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're better off consuming your media in the traditional medium - once a week and loaded with ads.

  31. No, study finds... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    That binge watching "BBC Cold War-era drama 'The Game'" makes it less enjoyable.

    Some shows lend themselves to binge watching more than others. Especially shows that progress the main story arc little from episode to episode.

    1. Re:No, study finds... by Kellamity · · Score: 1

      A better study would have been with different types of shows, one type that ends with each episode leaving you without the answers you want, and desperate for the next episode to start, like Orphan Black, and another type where the story is neatly wrapped up at the end of each episode, like House. I’m willing the bet the result of the study would be, ‘Binge watching TV makes you enjoy some shows more, but not others’. I don’t think many people would be interested in reading the results of that study though.

    2. Re:No, study finds... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      With two groups of 17 as the subjects the sample size of this study amounts to "click bait." I have personal anecdotes with more statistical significance.

  32. Less Enjoyable - Warching more TV? by shubus · · Score: 1

    You have to be kidding. Glad I solved such dumb ass problems years ago by loosing the TV. Try it sometime--you might get your life back.

    1. Re:Less Enjoyable - Warching more TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be kidding. Glad I solved such dumb ass problems years ago by loosing the TV. Try it sometime--you might get your life back.

      When you loosed the TV, did it run off, or just sit there pouting and looking confused?

  33. One Episode A Day is Not Binge Watching by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

    Reading the TFA (I know, I know, what sort of slashdotter am I?) we find that only people watching multiple episodes at a sitting found the experience "less enjoyable". People who watched one episode each day in a row found it equally enjoyable.

    I found waiting for the end of Breaking Bad and watching all 62 episodes over two months (one a day) to be quite enjoyable, and I am certain that I caught certain plot points that spanned seasons (which aired over a five year period) better than I would have with nearly year-long breaks between seasons.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    1. Re:One Episode A Day is Not Binge Watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kept hearing about people's frustration with Breaking Bad with its delays and long pauses between seasons, and something about the last season being split over 2 years. I was "fortunate" (?) enough to have completely ignored BB until the whole show had run its course, then I queued it all up and watched it over a period of 13 evenings (would've been 12 if I hadn't taken a break to go see one of the Hobbit movies in theaters when it came out).

      Being blissfully single, I could easily sit through 6-8 episodes an evening. That was awesome TV - nobody can convince me I would've enjoyed it more had I waited months between each season.

      As a side-note, this is one of the *many* shows I've downloaded, watched, enjoyed, and decided was worth a purchase. Had it not been for downloads, I never would've bothered, and they never would've sold me a box set of a show I would've never seen.

  34. This just in ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Instant gratification found to be less satisfying.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  35. Well, duh! by prince+hal · · Score: 1

    Researchers discover that people don't really enjoy binge-watching shows that they're forced to watch, especially ones they're not that interested in to begin with.

    Honestly, who gave them funding for that?

  36. Binge all the way by grub · · Score: 1


    binge-watchers had the strongest memory performance the day after watching the show, but this retention also had the sharpest decline over 140 days

    Why do I care about the nuances of a show after nearly five months? I'll remember the general story and if I enjoyed the show or not. The fact that Jon Snow had a hairless ass when he was banging his aunt won't concern me in January.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  37. Retention != Enjoyment by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I find I recall things better over the whole story arc when I watch a series of episodes in sequence. One hour a week and I get bored and stop watching...or I wait for a half dozen to record on the DVR and then watch.

    TV is too much of a pain in the ass anyway with all the commercials. ..and they wonder why people don't want to pay $150/mo for all that interruption..

  38. quality by gravewax · · Score: 1

    Steaming Turds like The Defenders make it much less enjoyable. Personally a good series I find far more enjoyable to watch like a movie over a few nights. Shows like Defenders are a waste of a few hours after which time you realise it is shit and don't bother with the remainder of the series.

  39. Being 'forced' to binge watch a show... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    ...as part of a study. Makes it quite irritating. Especially if you didn't have a taste for cold-war dramas to being with.

  40. No. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    No, binge watching makes it clear when scriptwriters are stretching 1 hour of story over a span of 6+ episodes.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Most of the shows on the telly are basically the same episode over and over again, with as few new plot points per episode as the writers can get away with and story lines moving at a snail's pace. The reason they're more enjoyable when not binged is the same as the reason you can enjoy rewatching a shorter series or a film after some time has elapsed.

  41. Study TL;DR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... this retention also had the sharpest decline ...

    Study the material (Ideally, without binge-ing: After 25 minutes of study, have a 4 minute break, then a 1 minute recap), then 6 days later, revise the material.

  42. Study Is Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously. Or the subjects were idiots.

  43. My own take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm gonna call BS on their study.

    I can only speak for myself, but I'm *definitely* enjoying shows I binge-watch a lot more than shows I watch on a weekly basis. I tend to forget a lot of details if I have to wait a week in-between each show, especially for serial shows, where what happens in episode 1 has consequences in episode 2 (or 10). I get a lot more engrossed into the storyline and characters when I binge-watch.

    What I've found also is that if a show turns out to be crap, I'll realize it a lot sooner if I'm binge-watching than if there's a one-week delay between each show. Maybe that's what they found out by "enjoying it less". I call it not putting up with garbage instead - lowering the tolerance threshold. And that's fine by me, there's enough stuff on TV already that you shouldn't spend your time watching bad shows.

  44. FAKE NEWS by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    When I binge watch a show I actually get into it, when I have to wait a week between shows I barely follow the story and actually tend to forget about it between episodes. Every show has its good and bad episodes, but when you hit a bad one or 2-3 bad ones watching 1 per week you just say "this show turned to garbage" and stop watching, whereas if you're binge watching you just go through it because you know with several dozen others it's bound to get good again.

  45. Another Typical Day on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump hater clickbait - check, will get plenty of clicks there

    Hyped up west coast progressive story about the glory of solar, wind, biofuels, whatever -check, same people posting the same rants

    Doom and Gloom Story about huge tech layoffs in some sector - check, plenty of pissed off pessimist readers

    Robots are gonna take your job story - check (Indian developers are on hold right now)

    Some old technology that's not really dead story - check (pit the greybeards against the young hotshots)

    Meaningless survey with an absurd sample size on some topic guaranteed to get comments - check and here it is for today!!

    This site is no longer interesting it's just another carefully engineered PRODUCT with nothing but CRAP designed to annoy me so I'll post. Oh shit, they won again. Fuckers...

  46. Instant Gratification by yithar7153 · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a large bias towards binge watching. I think it's related to our society and the culture of impatience and instant gratification. I'd relate binge watching vs pacing a show out to orgasm vs heroin. Heroin gives a constant steady stream of dopamine release, while orgasm gives you this huge spike. So heroin actually feels better. I personally think taking a small dose of pleasure each day is better for our brains, but what do I know lol.