Fraud is not illegal in off iself. Fraud is a class of laws covering types of crime or civil laws. Basically, fraud is just a type of crime and the crime itself needs defined by law.
I see a lot of people who do not understand this. But ask yourself, does a magician face criminal penalties for doing tricks? That's fraud by definition. How about a 12 year old who tricks her brother into doing the dishes by saying her parents told her to tell him that.
Now something that is fraud is your ISP saying your service will be up to a speed then limiting i w to a slower speed. (Up to 5m and limiting it to up to 2m.) But no one seemed to be able to find any law making it illegal.
I dunno. It might be nice having a ms honey pot that you can make appear like any number of different devices. If you log it effectively, you might just find exploits that cross over to other windows versions.
Whether that is true or not does nothing to the fact that the original senate bill contained a public option. In fact, that little fact actually works with your grand conspiracy because if the public option was actually included, you would have an easier transition once it achieved that goal and they could boast about all the people moving to the public option.
The facts and your summation are not incompatible.
Programming should not replace literacy in math, reading, or writing. However, many students are apparently failing at those subjects anyway! At least that is what the testing regimen claims.
I think that was his point. It should not come as the expense of fundamental skills such as reading, writing and mathematics. In fact, that was a quote pulled directly from the article summery. If kids are not learning fundamental skills such as reading, writing and mathematics, pushing coding or any other comp science into the mix is glossing over the problems and will not benefit much of anyone.
lol.. Believe what you want. I mean I guess facts have no basis in some people's reality.
There was a single payer option in the original PPACA law in the senate but it was removed to get around a filibuster. There simply was not enough support for it as there was not enough support to pass the law without manipulations in the process.
Lol.. Blame it all on everyone else while the local corruption is glossed over. No, the drug cartels gained so much power because the PRI or Partido Revolucionario Institucional- allowed and cooperated with them. If you had to blame anyone outside of Mexico for the increased violence, you could blame Pablo Escobar who arranged for the Colombian cocaine to be shipped through Mexico in their own heroine and marijuana smuggling tracks.
Now that the PRI is out of power, the new political parties want to break up the cartels to gain aid and other gifts from the US which was a key component of NAFTA in which Mexico benefits more so than any other country involve. Fox pretended to care about the cartels and at one time actually stated it was the powerful cartels he wanted gone, not the drug trafficking.
And you're wrong about reconciliation being used to pass the ACA. It was passed with a supermajority in the Senate and a majority in the house.
No it was not. The democrats did not have a super majority at the time. They relied on 2 independents to get pass the filibuster.. The house didn't like the senate bill and only agreed to pass the senate version of the bill by using reconciliation to amend the law before sending it to the president. This is because Brown had taken office and would have provided the vote necessary to filibuster any future votes on the amended law. The reconciliation process bypassed the ability to filibuster the amendments which allowed a simple majority of democrats to pass it.
That's just the facts. You are entitled to your opinion but not your facts. The democrats used out of the ordinary tactics to get the PPACA passed into law and had to do it in ways that would bypass legislative norms in order to get around the republicans. Hell, even wikipedia has an accurate accounting of it. Try reading a bit before believing whatever idiot told you different.
Nope. Mexico would be no different today even if the US left it completely alone.
The problem is not the US doing anything to Mexico, it is Mexico and it's leadership. It has been corrupt and lacking in freedom since before the french owned your asses. Today, you have drug cartels that have been allowed to exist so long that they are more powerful than the government in many regards. You have people relegated to subsistence farming instead of an open market where they could actually farm something profitable and sell. The government rarely invests in highways or infrastructure outside a small few areas in which they have an economic interest in. The same is almost universally true with education (although Mexico has some very competent universities)
Yes, the problem with Mexico is Mexico- not the US.
So you think that we shouldn't even bother recording any government actions because the majority of it cannot be recorded and opened to public inspection anyways?
Lets get crazy and see how silly this sounds when we apply it to murder. We will never catch a certain percentage of murderers so investigating all of them is pointless. We will never document all illegal aliens so lets get rid of the legal process and ignore them altogether. Hmm.. sounds silly right? Almost as silly as ignoring Hillary's emailed that she took steps to hide from view because she has other ways of communicating whatever it is that she wanted hidden.
If Democrats are far left why didn't we get Single Payer healthcare?!
Are you really that stupid? Or do you think everyone else is?
We didn't get single payer healthcare because the democrats lost their majority in the senate and they had to pull tricks like erasing a bill already passed by the house in order to put obama care into it and then using reconciliation rules which is reserved for budget bills to get the PPACA passed and on the desk of Obama before Brown took office and blocked it. Just because they were limited and couldn't jump through hoops enough to get what you wanted doesn't mean they are not far left. There was supposed to be a single payer option that got left out of the bill that passed due to the shenanigans they had to employ in order to pass it. Hell, if you bothered following any of it, you never would have made that statement. I suggest you do know better which is why you posted AC. The democrats almost never got the PPACA passed in the first place.
Did you actually hack the registry or apply a.reg file someone else already figured out (patched)?
I mean the distinction is about as much as saying you hacked into a website when you deleted the file name in the address bar and was presented with a directory listing verses gaining admin privileges and locking all the registered users out or crediting them as having already paid for another year of access. One is a hack, the other is piss poor administration by the website. can you guess which is which?
Most of the descriptions I have bothered looking at have language in it describing the type of security blunder- i.e execute code remotely- and a link to a more thorough explanation.
No. . Being a minor is not enough. The cops can and have questioned kids before. No Miranda does not say anything about it until the boy was under arrest. Being questioned - even if detained - does not equal under arrest. You are never under arrest when getting a speeding ticket but you are detained and often questioned.
As for fake bomb. The first teacher he showed it to told him not to take it around school because it looked like it could be a bomb. My guess is that it actually looked like a bomb until you examined it closely.
Yeah, it kind of does. Not something to be worshipped or anything mind you. But the biggest reason you or your children are not forced to be a soldier is because we have competent people who for whatever reason volunteer to risk being in harm's way. Many countries have or relatively recently had compulsory service in the military. We have managed through the bravery of these volunteers to for the most part abolish that.
With an all volunteer military and the ability to do whatever you want instead of standing in their place does elevate them a bit and we certainly should honor our obligations to them above any political show boating.
First, planned parenthood doesn't have any capacity to perform any women's health services other than abortions and referrals to other programs already in place. Well, that's if you do not count birth control as a woman's health service. But that would be like Philip Morris getting federal money to give out mexate and methotrexate as a public health service.
Second, abortions equal about 12% of pp services provided so its not as small as it is made out to be. To further this point, abortions account for almost 40% of their annual revenue. Federa funding is about 20%. They make more money from abortions than federal funding.
Finally, no. The interstate system is state funded and has been since the 1970s when the states took control of them. The feds still collect a fuel tax and most of it gets appropriated to the highways but the states pay a majority of all project costs.
As for the oil subsidies, very few people i have talked with know about any specific ones and those that do change their mind about ending those specific ones. They still want to end all the ones they do not know anything about but insist is happening and needs to end. You probably wouldn't be the same if you actually looked into them. You should try it and see.
I've looked and looked. I cannot find anything saying due process required parents outside of tv shows.
And you should investigate this a lot better. No-one started freaking out when he brought it to school. He showed two separate teacher- one of which said not to carry it around because it looks like a bomb. It wasn't until several classes latter that it went off in a class disrupting it while he opened the case and turned the alarm off. This is when he was asked why he still had it with him. The principal remembered suspending his sister for uttering a bomb threat and called the law reporting a fake bomb. The cops asked him why he had it and he refused to say anything so they arrested him.
I know , the real story is not as inciting as the popular narrative. But as far as i can tell, That's what happened
They asked him why he was taking it to other classes when a teacher already told him he shouldn't because it looks like a bomb in the suitcase contraption.
The big lie in this story is that anyone in charge who looked at the device actually thought it was a bomb. They all knew it wasn't. They wanted to know why he didn't put it away like another teacher suggested. A simple "to show my friends " would have likely ended it before the cops were even called. But given that his sister had already been suspended for uttering a bomb threat before, his refusing looked more sinister than it probably was.
His parents and attorney are distractions at this point. If a cop catches someone with a gun whether real or imitation, he can ask what the kid was planning to do with it without either. He wasn't under arrest until he failed to answer which gave suspicions of illegal intent. It seems that he even now needs prodding to tell the story if you believe Mark Cuban 's story.
Slashdot Mirror
The US and about any country for that matter also has sovereign immunity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Fraud is not illegal in off iself. Fraud is a class of laws covering types of crime or civil laws. Basically, fraud is just a type of crime and the crime itself needs defined by law.
I see a lot of people who do not understand this. But ask yourself, does a magician face criminal penalties for doing tricks? That's fraud by definition. How about a 12 year old who tricks her brother into doing the dishes by saying her parents told her to tell him that.
Now something that is fraud is your ISP saying your service will be up to a speed then limiting i w to a slower speed. (Up to 5m and limiting it to up to 2m.) But no one seemed to be able to find any law making it illegal.
I dunno. It might be nice having a ms honey pot that you can make appear like any number of different devices. If you log it effectively, you might just find exploits that cross over to other windows versions.
Are you going to put in your drones so they phone home right before crashing into a Microsoft campus building?
Whether that is true or not does nothing to the fact that the original senate bill contained a public option. In fact, that little fact actually works with your grand conspiracy because if the public option was actually included, you would have an easier transition once it achieved that goal and they could boast about all the people moving to the public option.
The facts and your summation are not incompatible.
I think that was his point. It should not come as the expense of fundamental skills such as reading, writing and mathematics. In fact, that was a quote pulled directly from the article summery. If kids are not learning fundamental skills such as reading, writing and mathematics, pushing coding or any other comp science into the mix is glossing over the problems and will not benefit much of anyone.
lol.. Believe what you want. I mean I guess facts have no basis in some people's reality.
There was a single payer option in the original PPACA law in the senate but it was removed to get around a filibuster. There simply was not enough support for it as there was not enough support to pass the law without manipulations in the process.
Lol.. Blame it all on everyone else while the local corruption is glossed over. No, the drug cartels gained so much power because the PRI or Partido Revolucionario Institucional- allowed and cooperated with them. If you had to blame anyone outside of Mexico for the increased violence, you could blame Pablo Escobar who arranged for the Colombian cocaine to be shipped through Mexico in their own heroine and marijuana smuggling tracks.
Now that the PRI is out of power, the new political parties want to break up the cartels to gain aid and other gifts from the US which was a key component of NAFTA in which Mexico benefits more so than any other country involve. Fox pretended to care about the cartels and at one time actually stated it was the powerful cartels he wanted gone, not the drug trafficking.
Systematic poverty and poor education is blamed largely for enabling this situation. That is brought about because of oppression of government and illegal activity being about the only real way of advancing out of poverty for the majority of Mexican citizens.Among the OECD countries, Mexico has the second highest degree of economic disparity between the extremely poor and extremely rich. The bottom ten percent in the income hierarchy disposes of 1.36% of the country's resources, whereas the upper ten percent dispose of almost 36%. OECD also notes that Mexico's budgeted expenses for poverty alleviation and social development is only about a third of the OECD average.
You can blame anything you want. But the only way to effect change is to understand the problem at it's roots and you seem to be ignoring that.
No it was not. The democrats did not have a super majority at the time. They relied on 2 independents to get pass the filibuster.. The house didn't like the senate bill and only agreed to pass the senate version of the bill by using reconciliation to amend the law before sending it to the president. This is because Brown had taken office and would have provided the vote necessary to filibuster any future votes on the amended law. The reconciliation process bypassed the ability to filibuster the amendments which allowed a simple majority of democrats to pass it.
That's just the facts. You are entitled to your opinion but not your facts. The democrats used out of the ordinary tactics to get the PPACA passed into law and had to do it in ways that would bypass legislative norms in order to get around the republicans. Hell, even wikipedia has an accurate accounting of it. Try reading a bit before believing whatever idiot told you different.
Nope. Mexico would be no different today even if the US left it completely alone.
The problem is not the US doing anything to Mexico, it is Mexico and it's leadership. It has been corrupt and lacking in freedom since before the french owned your asses. Today, you have drug cartels that have been allowed to exist so long that they are more powerful than the government in many regards. You have people relegated to subsistence farming instead of an open market where they could actually farm something profitable and sell. The government rarely invests in highways or infrastructure outside a small few areas in which they have an economic interest in. The same is almost universally true with education (although Mexico has some very competent universities)
Yes, the problem with Mexico is Mexico- not the US.
So you think that we shouldn't even bother recording any government actions because the majority of it cannot be recorded and opened to public inspection anyways?
Lets get crazy and see how silly this sounds when we apply it to murder. We will never catch a certain percentage of murderers so investigating all of them is pointless. We will never document all illegal aliens so lets get rid of the legal process and ignore them altogether. Hmm.. sounds silly right? Almost as silly as ignoring Hillary's emailed that she took steps to hide from view because she has other ways of communicating whatever it is that she wanted hidden.
Are you really that stupid? Or do you think everyone else is?
We didn't get single payer healthcare because the democrats lost their majority in the senate and they had to pull tricks like erasing a bill already passed by the house in order to put obama care into it and then using reconciliation rules which is reserved for budget bills to get the PPACA passed and on the desk of Obama before Brown took office and blocked it. Just because they were limited and couldn't jump through hoops enough to get what you wanted doesn't mean they are not far left. There was supposed to be a single payer option that got left out of the bill that passed due to the shenanigans they had to employ in order to pass it. Hell, if you bothered following any of it, you never would have made that statement. I suggest you do know better which is why you posted AC. The democrats almost never got the PPACA passed in the first place.
Did you actually hack the registry or apply a .reg file someone else already figured out
(patched)?
I mean the distinction is about as much as saying you hacked into a website when you deleted the file name in the address bar and was presented with a directory listing verses gaining admin privileges and locking all the registered users out or crediting them as having already paid for another year of access. One is a hack, the other is piss poor administration by the website. can you guess which is which?
Most of the descriptions I have bothered looking at have language in it describing the type of security blunder- i.e execute code remotely- and a link to a more thorough explanation.
Did this change with windows 10?
No. . Being a minor is not enough. The cops can and have questioned kids before. No Miranda does not say anything about it until the boy was under arrest. Being questioned - even if detained - does not equal under arrest. You are never under arrest when getting a speeding ticket but you are detained and often questioned.
As for fake bomb. The first teacher he showed it to told him not to take it around school because it looked like it could be a bomb. My guess is that it actually looked like a bomb until you examined it closely.
Yeah, it kind of does. Not something to be worshipped or anything mind you. But the biggest reason you or your children are not forced to be a soldier is because we have competent people who for whatever reason volunteer to risk being in harm's way. Many countries have or relatively recently had compulsory service in the military. We have managed through the bravery of these volunteers to for the most part abolish that.
With an all volunteer military and the ability to do whatever you want instead of standing in their place does elevate them a bit and we certainly should honor our obligations to them above any political show boating.
First, planned parenthood doesn't have any capacity to perform any women's health services other than abortions and referrals to other programs already in place. Well, that's if you do not count birth control as a woman's health service. But that would be like Philip Morris getting federal money to give out mexate and methotrexate as a public health service.
Second, abortions equal about 12% of pp services provided so its not as small as it is made out to be. To further this point, abortions account for almost 40% of their annual revenue. Federa funding is about 20%. They make more money from abortions than federal funding.
Finally, no. The interstate system is state funded and has been since the 1970s when the states took control of them. The feds still collect a fuel tax and most of it gets appropriated to the highways but the states pay a majority of all project costs.
As for the oil subsidies, very few people i have talked with know about any specific ones and those that do change their mind about ending those specific ones. They still want to end all the ones they do not know anything about but insist is happening and needs to end. You probably wouldn't be the same if you actually looked into them. You should try it and see.
I've looked and looked. I cannot find anything saying due process required parents outside of tv shows.
And you should investigate this a lot better. No-one started freaking out when he brought it to school. He showed two separate teacher- one of which said not to carry it around because it looks like a bomb. It wasn't until several classes latter that it went off in a class disrupting it while he opened the case and turned the alarm off. This is when he was asked why he still had it with him. The principal remembered suspending his sister for uttering a bomb threat and called the law reporting a fake bomb. The cops asked him why he had it and he refused to say anything so they arrested him.
I know , the real story is not as inciting as the popular narrative. But as far as i can tell, That's what happened
They asked him why he was taking it to other classes when a teacher already told him he shouldn't because it looks like a bomb in the suitcase contraption.
The big lie in this story is that anyone in charge who looked at the device actually thought it was a bomb. They all knew it wasn't. They wanted to know why he didn't put it away like another teacher suggested. A simple "to show my friends " would have likely ended it before the cops were even called. But given that his sister had already been suspended for uttering a bomb threat before, his refusing looked more sinister than it probably was.
Seems to convoluted. It fails the sniff test. Especially since i responded to a bigot making a bigoted statement.
His parents and attorney are distractions at this point. If a cop catches someone with a gun whether real or imitation, he can ask what the kid was planning to do with it without either. He wasn't under arrest until he failed to answer which gave suspicions of illegal intent. It seems that he even now needs prodding to tell the story if you believe Mark Cuban 's story.
Not progressive enough does not equal the republican agenda. Come back to reality.
Who is forcing the American public to do anything?
Why do you invent scenarios trying to justify the confiscation of freedom and pretend it didn't happen at the same time?
That's not the version i heard. Oh well. I guess the truth will come out in a few years but still not matter.
So what was it's purpose and when did he tell them? What is not true again?