Never mind is about right. You cannot invent a position and assign it to a group of people while ignoring their objections to it. That's like saying that the black lives matter movement is advancing the agenda of the national police unions.
Don't forget freedom itself. You are now obligated to purchase something from a third party because of nothing more than being a citizen and of legal age.
Not to mention that roe v wade was decided largely on a right to privacy in that the protections from search prohibit the government from nosing into your health care. Now the federal government has a distinct right to be involved via the ACA which calls roe into question.
No. He wouldn't in this zero tolerance world. Just like pointing a finger like a gun is enough.
My understanding is that the arrest happened after refusing to answer why he brought it to school. Evidently this genius kid forgot until after the arrest.
Why would they invent some bullshit back story just to stroke your bigoted ego?
Yes, story is they knew it wasn't real, the kid got arrested when asked why and refused to answer. Turns out some unusual suspects seem to think something is fishy with the entire ordeal. As if it was orchestrated on purpose just to let idiots like you have an opportunity to prove how much of one you are.
No I didn't RTFS but exactly what would the criminal charges be in a case like this? There was something similar a while back in which some car maker used a distinct programing settings in the ECM which allowed fuel economy to be inflated but shipped a different version so the consumer didn't complain the car was a turd in performance. As far as I know, the only thing that came of that was a change in economy measurement standards and revised estimates.
I was with you until you threw that not own a gun thing in there. I'm not sure how you can see right through the terrorism smoke screen but buy the gun lie hook line and sinker.
It's amazing that you appear to actually believe what you are saying. I suggest that if we criminalize thought that you do not like, we need to do the same for the brainwashed thought you are demonstrating.
First, there is absolutely no credible evidence, scientific or not, that humanity is or will be damned to extinction. Second, there is no credible evidence saying reducing fossil fuel use is the only cure for global warming or that adaptation is not a viable if not harsh alternative. You know, survival of the fittest and all. Finally, the people largely behind claims like you just made are profiting from them too. Here is an inconvenient truth, al Gore sells or sold carbon offsets and purchased a house right on the beach (in direct danger of his warnings) with the profits. Obviously he isn't as worried about it as he would like you to be.
Do they make flash drives capable of making up for the headless state of USB connection? Seems to me that you would need something almost a computer in order to handle the interchange overhead or whatever it is called in order to transfer the files on and off the phone. At that point, you really don't need the phone or tablet any more.
Not only that, we had a window sensor go bad at a company I worked for about 20 years ago. It became so sensitive that someone driving by the window or a bird singing on the ledge would set it off. but it wouldn't do that all the time. After 3 false alarms, they were fined $300 plus the costs of the response and the fines went up progressively after that. It went off something like 6 times total over the course of two weeks before their alarm guy found the problem.
So not only check with the local police, but check if there are any fines and so on for false alarms. It might make a roll your own solution impractical if you aren't sure you will get it perfectly right the first time.
lol.. You can find the Bhopal disaster almost recreated in California with regulated utility companies. Or did you forget about those regulated gas lines exploding a few years back?
As for ford pintos, what is your point? They were stuck with the liability over it and payed in the long run both in a lawsuit (several actually) and a massive recall they had to effect. Also, the government already essentially green lighted Ford's practices with the pinto so this regulate everything mindset obviously didn't work. You should read up on the Schwartz paper from 1991 on the subject.
For Standard Oil, we all know what happened there. I can probably fill this page with lists of companies who did things that was legal at the time and are not legal now because we decided to make a law against it. It would completely pale in comparison to companies and people who do things that are legal and never have laws made to forbid it.
The bottom line is, either you are free or you are not free. If you value freedom, you have to allow people to do things without getting permission. If you do not, find yourself a mistress and see how much fun it is asking if it's ok to do anything and letting someone else dictate your life to you. I'm betting for the vast majority of people, it will get old really quick.
I see how you know you lost the argument based on reality and have to invent your own in order to keep your theory making sense. It's all hogwash. If you do not want to work 80 hours a week, then don't. But don't use your own shortcomings or preferences to prevent others from doing so. And do not invent irrational fears of people walking in front of cars as your reasoning for it.
The bottom line is that there is no difference between you working 13 hours a day or working 9 hours a day (8 work plus 1 hour lunch) and spending another 4 or 5 carting the rugrats to and from soccer, stopping at the grocery and so on before going home. Most mom's have put in way worse schedules than that and even did it while pretending to smile rather than have junior know how much of a pain in the ass he has become.
Perhaps there are people who are all those things you think I'm better at. I would say it is the majority of the population where I am from and just the average person though.
I don't think Israel has ever denied having nukes. They avoid the question or pull one of those "I can neither confirm nor deny" answers.
As for Mossad assassinating people, I don't really care if they do or do not. The people I know of who it is claimed that they assassinated are people I'm more comfortable living in a world that doesn't have them in it. If they do assassinate people, I can think of several more they should get on top of. But as I said, I don't really care about it.
The 40 hour work week grew out of the idea and concept of not allowing workers to monopolize the available jobs. When people typically worked from dawn to dusk 6 days a week, you had about an 80 or so hour week. Then someone got the idea that you could split that between two employees and the 40 hour work week was born.
Now, if you go straight home after work and don't leave until the next work day, you might have a point about the driving or stepping in front of a car. Even then, it's a stretch to even reach that point. But lets run through a typical day. get up at 5am, get ready and commute commute to work. Work 9 hours a day (8 hours of work and 1 hour lunch), get home by 5 or 6 pm, watch the news, eat dinner, get on the inter-web and check the cat videos, off to bed by 9 or 10 pm. that's getting a good 7-8 hours sleep a night. That's still over 100 hours you are not sleeping a week. If working 80 of them is such a problem, why isn't being up and doing something the other 20 or more hours such a problem also?
Of course the answer is that neither is a problem. You simply had not thought it through and wanted to make some obscene comment on why you think it's a good idea to dictate how others live their life. At least you didn't pull out a bible and pretend to preach from authority.
It doesn't matter how it worked for wall street (which was actually a combination of government policy and wall street). If you value freedom and liberty then it is absolutely how it has to work that way. Otherwise you wouldn't be allowed to do anything without the government's permission. You do not want that whether you know it or not.
Your missing the point, those workers would still be traveling without pay. If you live 1 hours from work and lose your job because the employer now has to pay that travel time, your only likely replacement job will be one where you travel the 1 hour on your own to a central place and then start working.
In other words, what changes with his straw man or your solution? Think it through a bit before answering. The total number of employees needed might not change, but nothing says the employees will be the same ones.
This is probably where the entire idea of not paying for the trip to the first or from the last client came from. In the US, generally the trip to and from work is not deductible and that translates to the first client and from the last client if you originate and end your day at home or some other non work related site. Travel between work places are deductible so after the first job site until the last job site, even if for multiple employers is all deductible.
I'm not sure if this ruling would change any of that though. What this essentially says is the employer must count it as time worked. This is important for taxes or benefits they pay and possibly overtime and so on. Suppose you have a 1 hour travel to your first client and a half hour travel from your last. You either work 7.5 total hours less in a work week or you start acquiring overtime pay 7 hours sooner.
Probably in a similar way they theorize on this planet but with the missing ingredient that we cannot seem to find to create life on this planet- even to this day. Of course we can bend and mold existing life forms into uniquely different forms, but we are starting with life already.
Evidently the replacements aren't worth their salt is what.
I heard an interview with the guy a few days ago and he said that the skilled people are leaving and new highers- even ones who appear over talented, stop performing shortly after being hired and he's had to apply additional staff to get things done. He said he doesn't ever remember working as hard as he is now trying to pick up the slack before this move.
Soldiers typically need a lot more calories. Where it would interesting is an emergency food source or part of one for disasters ans such. I keep MREs around just because in the winter, it is possible i can get snowed in for two or three days without power or water (well run off electric )
Are you sure that isn't what they were considering in the article summery "At first their legs only moved involuntarily, if at all. But they soon found they could voluntarily extend the distance their legs moved during stimulation."
I guess when the device is first connected, there is random movement. The patient then quickly builds the ability to control and extends this movement. But I'm under the understanding it is due to the process not the patients themselves.
I find the interesting part to be the telemetry data is all that is being released. Most of the drones like the one in question that I am aware of record the entire flight as well as transmit it back for live viewing. Why is there non of this footage over this guys house available?
I mean the easiest way to refute the claim that the drone was hovering over his house and peeping and all that would be to release the flight video itself and show that for a fact it did not do any of these things. The only thing I can think of for not releasing it is that maybe it doesn't show what they want it to show.
Typical? What is typical? I mean is this an open choke, modified choke? No choke at all? What barrel length is typical and what number shot do you consider typical?
And with all this in mind, was the shotgun in question your version of a typical shotgun?
I can tell you are no lefty even though you might think you are. One of the key debating points of a lefty is how they derail the conversation from the critical points and into BS like you height and weight in order to avoid the process of actually having to think and put a position out filled with reason and logic instead of emotion. You fell for it and here you are being part of it. Maybe the fact that you admit to owning a gun and not being afraid to publicly acknowledge you will use it is a sign of your mental disorder or something.
Oh, and no, I'm not saying he isn't a lefty, we have had many conversations in which I know for a fact that he at least thinks he is a lefty. He just doesn't fit the stereotype and fell for one of their own tricks and spent too much energy on every unrelated ancillary detail while his point suffers.
Slashdot Mirror
Never mind is about right. You cannot invent a position and assign it to a group of people while ignoring their objections to it. That's like saying that the black lives matter movement is advancing the agenda of the national police unions.
Don't forget freedom itself. You are now obligated to purchase something from a third party because of nothing more than being a citizen and of legal age.
Not to mention that roe v wade was decided largely on a right to privacy in that the protections from search prohibit the government from nosing into your health care. Now the federal government has a distinct right to be involved via the ACA which calls roe into question.
No. He wouldn't in this zero tolerance world. Just like pointing a finger like a gun is enough.
My understanding is that the arrest happened after refusing to answer why he brought it to school. Evidently this genius kid forgot until after the arrest.
Why would they invent some bullshit back story just to stroke your bigoted ego?
Yes, story is they knew it wasn't real, the kid got arrested when asked why and refused to answer. Turns out some unusual suspects seem to think something is fishy with the entire ordeal. As if it was orchestrated on purpose just to let idiots like you have an opportunity to prove how much of one you are.
No I didn't RTFS but exactly what would the criminal charges be in a case like this? There was something similar a while back in which some car maker used a distinct programing settings in the ECM which allowed fuel economy to be inflated but shipped a different version so the consumer didn't complain the car was a turd in performance. As far as I know, the only thing that came of that was a change in economy measurement standards and revised estimates.
I was with you until you threw that not own a gun thing in there. I'm not sure how you can see right through the terrorism smoke screen but buy the gun lie hook line and sinker.
It's amazing that you appear to actually believe what you are saying. I suggest that if we criminalize thought that you do not like, we need to do the same for the brainwashed thought you are demonstrating.
First, there is absolutely no credible evidence, scientific or not, that humanity is or will be damned to extinction. Second, there is no credible evidence saying reducing fossil fuel use is the only cure for global warming or that adaptation is not a viable if not harsh alternative. You know, survival of the fittest and all. Finally, the people largely behind claims like you just made are profiting from them too. Here is an inconvenient truth, al Gore sells or sold carbon offsets and purchased a house right on the beach (in direct danger of his warnings) with the profits. Obviously he isn't as worried about it as he would like you to be.
Do they make flash drives capable of making up for the headless state of USB connection? Seems to me that you would need something almost a computer in order to handle the interchange overhead or whatever it is called in order to transfer the files on and off the phone. At that point, you really don't need the phone or tablet any more.
Not only that, we had a window sensor go bad at a company I worked for about 20 years ago. It became so sensitive that someone driving by the window or a bird singing on the ledge would set it off. but it wouldn't do that all the time. After 3 false alarms, they were fined $300 plus the costs of the response and the fines went up progressively after that. It went off something like 6 times total over the course of two weeks before their alarm guy found the problem.
So not only check with the local police, but check if there are any fines and so on for false alarms. It might make a roll your own solution impractical if you aren't sure you will get it perfectly right the first time.
lol.. You can find the Bhopal disaster almost recreated in California with regulated utility companies. Or did you forget about those regulated gas lines exploding a few years back?
As for ford pintos, what is your point? They were stuck with the liability over it and payed in the long run both in a lawsuit (several actually) and a massive recall they had to effect. Also, the government already essentially green lighted Ford's practices with the pinto so this regulate everything mindset obviously didn't work. You should read up on the Schwartz paper from 1991 on the subject.
For Standard Oil, we all know what happened there. I can probably fill this page with lists of companies who did things that was legal at the time and are not legal now because we decided to make a law against it. It would completely pale in comparison to companies and people who do things that are legal and never have laws made to forbid it.
The bottom line is, either you are free or you are not free. If you value freedom, you have to allow people to do things without getting permission. If you do not, find yourself a mistress and see how much fun it is asking if it's ok to do anything and letting someone else dictate your life to you. I'm betting for the vast majority of people, it will get old really quick.
lol..
I see how you know you lost the argument based on reality and have to invent your own in order to keep your theory making sense. It's all hogwash. If you do not want to work 80 hours a week, then don't. But don't use your own shortcomings or preferences to prevent others from doing so. And do not invent irrational fears of people walking in front of cars as your reasoning for it.
The bottom line is that there is no difference between you working 13 hours a day or working 9 hours a day (8 work plus 1 hour lunch) and spending another 4 or 5 carting the rugrats to and from soccer, stopping at the grocery and so on before going home. Most mom's have put in way worse schedules than that and even did it while pretending to smile rather than have junior know how much of a pain in the ass he has become.
Perhaps there are people who are all those things you think I'm better at. I would say it is the majority of the population where I am from and just the average person though.
I don't think Israel has ever denied having nukes. They avoid the question or pull one of those "I can neither confirm nor deny" answers.
As for Mossad assassinating people, I don't really care if they do or do not. The people I know of who it is claimed that they assassinated are people I'm more comfortable living in a world that doesn't have them in it. If they do assassinate people, I can think of several more they should get on top of. But as I said, I don't really care about it.
lol.. BS.
The 40 hour work week grew out of the idea and concept of not allowing workers to monopolize the available jobs. When people typically worked from dawn to dusk 6 days a week, you had about an 80 or so hour week. Then someone got the idea that you could split that between two employees and the 40 hour work week was born.
Now, if you go straight home after work and don't leave until the next work day, you might have a point about the driving or stepping in front of a car. Even then, it's a stretch to even reach that point. But lets run through a typical day. get up at 5am, get ready and commute commute to work. Work 9 hours a day (8 hours of work and 1 hour lunch), get home by 5 or 6 pm, watch the news, eat dinner, get on the inter-web and check the cat videos, off to bed by 9 or 10 pm. that's getting a good 7-8 hours sleep a night. That's still over 100 hours you are not sleeping a week. If working 80 of them is such a problem, why isn't being up and doing something the other 20 or more hours such a problem also?
Of course the answer is that neither is a problem. You simply had not thought it through and wanted to make some obscene comment on why you think it's a good idea to dictate how others live their life. At least you didn't pull out a bible and pretend to preach from authority.
Even though Israel has refused to admit to it over the years, almost everyone believes and has for a long time believed that they have nukes.
The only interesting timing here might be the amount of increase in interest in Israel's nuclear history given the Iran deal bullshit.
It doesn't matter how it worked for wall street (which was actually a combination of government policy and wall street). If you value freedom and liberty then it is absolutely how it has to work that way. Otherwise you wouldn't be allowed to do anything without the government's permission. You do not want that whether you know it or not.
Your missing the point, those workers would still be traveling without pay. If you live 1 hours from work and lose your job because the employer now has to pay that travel time, your only likely replacement job will be one where you travel the 1 hour on your own to a central place and then start working.
In other words, what changes with his straw man or your solution? Think it through a bit before answering. The total number of employees needed might not change, but nothing says the employees will be the same ones.
This is probably where the entire idea of not paying for the trip to the first or from the last client came from. In the US, generally the trip to and from work is not deductible and that translates to the first client and from the last client if you originate and end your day at home or some other non work related site. Travel between work places are deductible so after the first job site until the last job site, even if for multiple employers is all deductible.
I'm not sure if this ruling would change any of that though. What this essentially says is the employer must count it as time worked. This is important for taxes or benefits they pay and possibly overtime and so on. Suppose you have a 1 hour travel to your first client and a half hour travel from your last. You either work 7.5 total hours less in a work week or you start acquiring overtime pay 7 hours sooner.
Lol.. Sure it is. And sure they should be booted. Eventually, you will run out of potential workers when it seems to be every new hire though.
Probably in a similar way they theorize on this planet but with the missing ingredient that we cannot seem to find to create life on this planet- even to this day. Of course we can bend and mold existing life forms into uniquely different forms, but we are starting with life already.
Evidently the replacements aren't worth their salt is what.
I heard an interview with the guy a few days ago and he said that the skilled people are leaving and new highers- even ones who appear over talented, stop performing shortly after being hired and he's had to apply additional staff to get things done. He said he doesn't ever remember working as hard as he is now trying to pick up the slack before this move.
Soldiers typically need a lot more calories. Where it would interesting is an emergency food source or part of one for disasters ans such. I keep MREs around just because in the winter, it is possible i can get snowed in for two or three days without power or water (well run off electric )
Are you sure that isn't what they were considering in the article summery "At first their legs only moved involuntarily, if at all. But they soon found they could voluntarily extend the distance their legs moved during stimulation."
I guess when the device is first connected, there is random movement. The patient then quickly builds the ability to control and extends this movement. But I'm under the understanding it is due to the process not the patients themselves.
I find the interesting part to be the telemetry data is all that is being released. Most of the drones like the one in question that I am aware of record the entire flight as well as transmit it back for live viewing. Why is there non of this footage over this guys house available?
I mean the easiest way to refute the claim that the drone was hovering over his house and peeping and all that would be to release the flight video itself and show that for a fact it did not do any of these things. The only thing I can think of for not releasing it is that maybe it doesn't show what they want it to show.
Typical? What is typical? I mean is this an open choke, modified choke? No choke at all? What barrel length is typical and what number shot do you consider typical?
And with all this in mind, was the shotgun in question your version of a typical shotgun?
I can tell you are no lefty even though you might think you are. One of the key debating points of a lefty is how they derail the conversation from the critical points and into BS like you height and weight in order to avoid the process of actually having to think and put a position out filled with reason and logic instead of emotion. You fell for it and here you are being part of it. Maybe the fact that you admit to owning a gun and not being afraid to publicly acknowledge you will use it is a sign of your mental disorder or something.
Oh, and no, I'm not saying he isn't a lefty, we have had many conversations in which I know for a fact that he at least thinks he is a lefty. He just doesn't fit the stereotype and fell for one of their own tricks and spent too much energy on every unrelated ancillary detail while his point suffers.