Nested loops are like candy to SQL server, and I've heard this is the same for Sybase (understandably). Deep sets of nested loops will kick the other databases I've tested in the teeth. Given an instruction with several nested loops and 16 million rows of data, I got results from SQL server in 5 minutes, results from Oracle 9 in an hour, and results from Postgres in 18 hours. This was a year ago and Postgres has changed, so it might be better now. Does MySQL handle them well?
Because SQL Server and Sybase does not really perform nested loop, it optimizes it to hash join but still reports as nested loop. So should do Oracle and PostgreSQL but for some reasons in your tests they dailed to do so. Sometimes PostgreSQL optimizer need to be explicitly told not to use nested loop and use hash join instead
It proves again that Intel trademark has absolutely zero appeal. People use Intel processors because they are cheap and because they are compatible and can run older software. Intel releazes a processor that is expansive and uncompatible with wolder software, nobody buys it. No matter how many times advertizing of dancing engeneers in funny clothes are shown on TV.
Same thing applies to Microsoft too. People buy Microsoft operating systems not because they love them but because they are cheap and compatible with previous software. Should Microsoft sell expensive and incompatible operating system nobody will buy it.
I do not think that when astronauts who courageously put their lives on the line for the advancement of sciense die is funny. Period.
But I think that my joke is very funny. It is not about astronauts dying for a cause but about politicians who for their personal enrichment insist on usage of outdated, expensive, astronaut-murdering technology that shuttle is.
Hope I made myself clear. No offence to the astronauts.
Yes, there is no rival to shuttle when it comes to lifting heavy weights. But expensive maintenance of reusable shuttle makes liftig these weight prohibitive expensive, so scientists try to pack their stuff lighter and send off with Russians.
I swear I used it before! Back in 1999. Microsoft launched it to a great fanfare and I jumped right in with my brand new IE version 5.0.
It was a kind of portal, I could customize the soruces of news, horoscope, weather and the page
used to have indicator to show how fast it would
download in 56k modem. More stuff added to it,
indicator would go up.
Q: What is the difference between Russian space rocket and the Shuttle?
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
If they refuces to work on the program somebody else would have done the nuke before them because the idea was floating in the air, as they say. And if these otheres were Nazis or Russians the world would have been quite a different place with America most likely on bottom instead of on top as it is now.
These people are heroes. Who is only wrong is the journalists having morbid pleasures asking poor scientist these kind of questions.
And it is still used now for the very same purpose. Mainframes have no USB or CD, only tapes and floppies as removable storage. But, of course, floppy drive in PC is an anachronism.
Slashdot Mirror
Because SQL Server and Sybase does not really perform nested loop, it optimizes it to hash join but still reports as nested loop. So should do Oracle and PostgreSQL but for some reasons in your tests they dailed to do so. Sometimes PostgreSQL optimizer need to be explicitly told not to use nested loop and use hash join instead
Same thing applies to Microsoft too. People buy Microsoft operating systems not because they love them but because they are cheap and compatible with previous software. Should Microsoft sell expensive and incompatible operating system nobody will buy it.
Seriously folks, in Soviet Russia everything was public domain. I can't see what you capitalists are discussing here.
I wander if the the person who suggested Linus the name of Linux is the wone who has more rights to the trademark
I, for one, welcome our 64-bit multicore overlords.
zOS has not known rootkits. It has no root and no kernel. Ony sysprog and nucleus.
1. Come and look at PARC stuff
2. ????
3. Profit!
4. Goto 1
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
But I think that my joke is very funny. It is not about astronauts dying for a cause but about politicians who for their personal enrichment insist on usage of outdated, expensive, astronaut-murdering technology that shuttle is.
Hope I made myself clear. No offence to the astronauts.
Thanks man.
I am going to post this joke on every article about shuttle. Nice to hear a kind word.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
Get your XBox for nothin',
Get your chicks for free!
Yes, there is no rival to shuttle when it comes to lifting heavy weights. But expensive maintenance of reusable shuttle makes liftig these weight prohibitive expensive, so scientists try to pack their stuff lighter and send off with Russians.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
It was a kind of portal, I could customize the soruces of news, horoscope, weather and the page used to have indicator to show how fast it would download in 56k modem. More stuff added to it, indicator would go up.
Here is a sample of what it used to be.
A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable.
Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut?
A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
Q: What is the difference between Russian space rocket and the Shuttle? A: Russian rocket burn in the atmosphere, Shuttle is reusable. Q: What is the difference between a cosmonaut and an astronaut? A: Astronauts burn in the atmosphere, cosmonauts are reusable.
4) Profit!
It will explode and kill all the astronauts. You heared it here first.
These people are heroes. Who is only wrong is the journalists having morbid pleasures asking poor scientist these kind of questions.
And it is still used now for the very same purpose. Mainframes have no USB or CD, only tapes and floppies as removable storage. But, of course, floppy drive in PC is an anachronism.
MVS is IBM Mainframe perating system. It got a TCP/PI stack only by the end of '90-ies