While VoIP certainly can use UDP, it's also quite possible (and even common) for VoIP calls to use TCP as the transport. Hell, the original paper even mentions steganography over TCP.
Saying "VOIP uses UDP, not TCP" is overly simplistic. RTP can run over either UDP or TCP, while SRTP runs over TLS-over-TCP.
Wow, you're really a mentally unstable piece of shit.
Something is only a lie if it is made knowing it is false. Your own libel is proven here (bold mine):
A complete tangent that demonstrates your willingness to lie to make your point, thus destroying your credibility, and therefore being relevant to ALL of your points. You are a known committer of libel and defamation of character.
No kidding. I've used Gentoo for years; when I got a new computer a few months ago, I was considering switching to something else, perhaps something Debian-based, out of a combination of wanting to try something different and the fact that I use Debian at work.
I ended up sticking with Gentoo. Why? It has by far and above the most complete package repository out there. Most other distros are spineless and leave out things like libdvdcss, lame, win32codecs, and mad. Gentoo, on the other hand, has everything.
No, I did not lie about something. I did not know that juvie had classes available. Not everyone knows everything about everything. The nature of juvenile prison has absolutely nothing to do with the argument that electronically tagging people is wrong. It was a complete tangent and might as well be a different post.
You, on the other hand, with reckless disregard for the truth, assumed I lied. That is libel with malice. Congratulations, you're now open to a lawsuit. And I'm sure your employer would love to keep a known libeler onboard. Your family would really love to know that too.
You will never amount to anything more than a filthy cunt in life.
I guess you think it is better that the kids be allowed to skip school, not get an education, and end up working mcjobs or worse as gang-bangers, thieves, drug dealers, or other criminals. Or, do you think they will make anything else of themselves after they "snooze until 2 p.m. before strolling into school" and falling falling so far behind they fail most of their classes.
Maybe you missed the part where Pacheco could have been sent to juvenile detention and how his mother is glad he has to do this. The fact that they'd consider putting people who skip school into prison (yes, juvie is prison with an age limit) is just as appalling. Yes, let's punish people who don't go to school by...putting them somewhere they can't get any education and will be guaranteed to fall in with the wrong crowd and become hardened criminals.
If people don't want an education, they should be hung out to dry. If they don't want to be able to have a job where they can support themselves, let them live in squalor.
Hey, I know, maybe the truth is that you are worried that you won't have anyone to wait on you at McDonald's, mow your lawn, and do the rest of the shit jobs you don't want to do. And what's wrong with that? Someone has to be on the bottom; might as well be the people with no ambition to be anything else.
Or, maybe it is that you just can't wait to pay higher taxes to support the ignorant. They should get no support from the government whatsoever. Thus, no more taxes.
Yes, you are ashamed of your city because you believe it is better to let ignorant, selfish, lazy children grow up to be ignorant, selfish, lazy adults who are a burden to the rest of society. Electronically tagging people is wrong no matter what.
This won't do anything for people who won't go to school and have no desire to get an education. They'll just drop out either as soon as it's legal or as soon as they turn 18, depending on how adamant their parents are.
You are a dumb-ass. Fuck you.
Luckily, I grew up in the part of North Dallas that was serviced by Richardson ISD, so I never had to deal with DISD, but I've heard horror stories. Granted, RISD has its share of suck (or at least some schools did--they had quite a bit of leeway with their policies), but it was nowhere nearly as bad as what I've heard about DISD.
Another non-smoking redneck town. Nothing worth seeing outside of Deep Ellum. I have to agree. And even Deep Ellum may be going away; the city plans to rennovate it and turn it into the eastern version of the West End (the East End?). Yuck.
Dallas has been on one steady decline for years. All the places I remember going to as a kid are gone. All development is in Plano and Frisco now, and none of it is anywhere near as cool as what I grew up with in Dallas. Remember Olla Padrida? Good luck seeing anything like that in Nu Dallas/Greater Frisco anymore.
And you know what I also miss? Smoking areas.
Damn...I'm only in my 20s, but I already sound like a bitter old man.
That the LA government is pulling this is no surprise. They're horribly corrupt. Phrases like "detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare" are well-known to be excuses for imposing dictatorship.
I work in a place that's best described as half-open.
We have cubes, but the cube walls are very short. I'm 5'7", and when I'm standing, the cube wall comes up to about an inch below my armpit.
It has the advantage of giving everyone their own space while still giving the office an open, airy feel. All I have to do is stand up, and I can see everyone working in their cubes.
I'm sure a lot of people will refuse to buy Spore and Mass Effect because of this.
I suggest that people here buy about $20 worth of EA stock. Write letters to EA mentioning that you're a shareholder and express concern that the DRM will result in less sales. When the sales figures come out, claim the DRM has resulted in the sales not being higher than they could be, and file a shareholder suit against EA, requesting that the judge require EA to strip out the DRM.
Strauss Zelnick now has cause to file criminal charges against Jack Thompson for stalking. Sending creepy letters to your target's relatives would be considered stalking by any judge.
He could even get a restraining order banning Jack Thompson from communicating with him, his family, or his company in any way, shape, or form.
"Moral relativist" is nothing but another word for "sociopath". Only a sociopath doesn't distinguish between right and wrong.
Moral relativism is nothing but an excuse to justify evil.
It's also documented fact that moral relativism was introduced to American intellectuals by members of Soviet intelligence during the Stalin era in order to weaken America in preparation for a Soviet invasion.
The phrase "considered harmful" implies that there is a large community consensus that something is considered harmful.
But it's never used like that; it's always used by one opinionated loudmouth who is the only one in the world who considers the practice harmful. You want another example? Look at that crock of an essay "Reply-to munging considered harmful"; the only one who considers reply-to munging harmful is the opinionated loudmouth who wrote that essay, yet the title falsely implies that the community as a whole has decided reply-to munging is harmful.
It's a phrase filled with sound and fury, an attempt to deceive people into thinking there is a consensus when there is none.
Slashdot Mirror
While VoIP certainly can use UDP, it's also quite possible (and even common) for VoIP calls to use TCP as the transport. Hell, the original paper even mentions steganography over TCP.
Saying "VOIP uses UDP, not TCP" is overly simplistic. RTP can run over either UDP or TCP, while SRTP runs over TLS-over-TCP.
So I see you've been chugging the Kool-Aid.
That's funny.
Penn & Teller proved years ago that recycling just wastes resources unless you're only recycling aluminum cans.
I can't read about recycling anymore without laughing my arse off.
Even the founder of Greenpeace has disowned them, because they go way too far.
They're a bunch of nutjobs, and only one step away from terrorists.
Something is only a lie if it is made knowing it is false. Your own libel is proven here (bold mine): A complete tangent that demonstrates your willingness to lie to make your point, thus destroying your credibility, and therefore being relevant to ALL of your points. You are a known committer of libel and defamation of character.
No, FC9 Beta was not a production OS.
FC9 final is a production OS.
Production OS != Enterprise OS.
No kidding. I've used Gentoo for years; when I got a new computer a few months ago, I was considering switching to something else, perhaps something Debian-based, out of a combination of wanting to try something different and the fact that I use Debian at work.
I ended up sticking with Gentoo. Why? It has by far and above the most complete package repository out there. Most other distros are spineless and leave out things like libdvdcss, lame, win32codecs, and mad. Gentoo, on the other hand, has everything.
No, I did not lie about something. I did not know that juvie had classes available. Not everyone knows everything about everything. The nature of juvenile prison has absolutely nothing to do with the argument that electronically tagging people is wrong. It was a complete tangent and might as well be a different post.
You, on the other hand, with reckless disregard for the truth, assumed I lied. That is libel with malice. Congratulations, you're now open to a lawsuit. And I'm sure your employer would love to keep a known libeler onboard. Your family would really love to know that too.
You will never amount to anything more than a filthy cunt in life.
Now, we just need to expand that out to 360 degrees, and we'll finally have a linear cockpit!
Actually, that part of my post was entirely tangential and has no bearing on my main argument.
You lose, try again.
Maybe you missed the part where Pacheco could have been sent to juvenile detention and how his mother is glad he has to do this. The fact that they'd consider putting people who skip school into prison (yes, juvie is prison with an age limit) is just as appalling. Yes, let's punish people who don't go to school by...putting them somewhere they can't get any education and will be guaranteed to fall in with the wrong crowd and become hardened criminals.
If people don't want an education, they should be hung out to dry. If they don't want to be able to have a job where they can support themselves, let them live in squalor. Hey, I know, maybe the truth is that you are worried that you won't have anyone to wait on you at McDonald's, mow your lawn, and do the rest of the shit jobs you don't want to do. And what's wrong with that? Someone has to be on the bottom; might as well be the people with no ambition to be anything else. Or, maybe it is that you just can't wait to pay higher taxes to support the ignorant. They should get no support from the government whatsoever. Thus, no more taxes. Yes, you are ashamed of your city because you believe it is better to let ignorant, selfish, lazy children grow up to be ignorant, selfish, lazy adults who are a burden to the rest of society. Electronically tagging people is wrong no matter what.
This won't do anything for people who won't go to school and have no desire to get an education. They'll just drop out either as soon as it's legal or as soon as they turn 18, depending on how adamant their parents are. You are a dumb-ass. Fuck you.
Yeah, DISD is truly shit-tastic.
Luckily, I grew up in the part of North Dallas that was serviced by Richardson ISD, so I never had to deal with DISD, but I've heard horror stories. Granted, RISD has its share of suck (or at least some schools did--they had quite a bit of leeway with their policies), but it was nowhere nearly as bad as what I've heard about DISD.
Dallas has been on one steady decline for years. All the places I remember going to as a kid are gone. All development is in Plano and Frisco now, and none of it is anywhere near as cool as what I grew up with in Dallas. Remember Olla Padrida? Good luck seeing anything like that in Nu Dallas/Greater Frisco anymore.
And you know what I also miss? Smoking areas.
Damn...I'm only in my 20s, but I already sound like a bitter old man.
I was born in Dallas, I was raised in Dallas, I went to college in the Dallas area, and I still live in Dallas.
I have _never_ been more ashamed of this city than I am now.
That the LA government is pulling this is no surprise. They're horribly corrupt. Phrases like "detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare" are well-known to be excuses for imposing dictatorship.
Look at the outright war the LA government is waging against hot dog vendors who want to sell bacon dogs. Is it any surprise LA is cracking down on freedom even more?
It's time for LA residents to use the second amendment for what it's supposed to be used for: protecting.themselves from the government.
I work in a place that's best described as half-open.
We have cubes, but the cube walls are very short. I'm 5'7", and when I'm standing, the cube wall comes up to about an inch below my armpit.
It has the advantage of giving everyone their own space while still giving the office an open, airy feel. All I have to do is stand up, and I can see everyone working in their cubes.
I'm sure a lot of people will refuse to buy Spore and Mass Effect because of this.
I suggest that people here buy about $20 worth of EA stock. Write letters to EA mentioning that you're a shareholder and express concern that the DRM will result in less sales. When the sales figures come out, claim the DRM has resulted in the sales not being higher than they could be, and file a shareholder suit against EA, requesting that the judge require EA to strip out the DRM.
If record players still exist now, VHS players will still exist a decade from now.
Their rules are immoral.
If they can't respect basic human rights, they need to have their country taken away from them.
I'm normally opposed to anything green, but this car is sexy.
Weighs only 2700 lbs and makes 200 lb*ft of torque at no rev? Yummy!
Strauss Zelnick now has cause to file criminal charges against Jack Thompson for stalking. Sending creepy letters to your target's relatives would be considered stalking by any judge.
He could even get a restraining order banning Jack Thompson from communicating with him, his family, or his company in any way, shape, or form.
Wow, you scare me.
"Moral relativist" is nothing but another word for "sociopath". Only a sociopath doesn't distinguish between right and wrong.
Moral relativism is nothing but an excuse to justify evil.
It's also documented fact that moral relativism was introduced to American intellectuals by members of Soviet intelligence during the Stalin era in order to weaken America in preparation for a Soviet invasion.
The fact that we don't need to rely on ourselves, the fact that we have other people do our dirty work for us, that makes us Superior.
The phrase "considered harmful" implies that there is a large community consensus that something is considered harmful.
But it's never used like that; it's always used by one opinionated loudmouth who is the only one in the world who considers the practice harmful. You want another example? Look at that crock of an essay "Reply-to munging considered harmful"; the only one who considers reply-to munging harmful is the opinionated loudmouth who wrote that essay, yet the title falsely implies that the community as a whole has decided reply-to munging is harmful.
It's a phrase filled with sound and fury, an attempt to deceive people into thinking there is a consensus when there is none.
I'd rather spark an intelligent discussion than rack up meaningless points. But maybe that's just me...
Because, you know, having good discussions benefits the whole community, and points just benefit my own karma.