Overclocking is done through the motherboard, not the actual RAM chip. It might, however, be possible (though probably prohibitively expensive) for them to create a second chip map for the review chips that would value speed above long-lasting reliability.
Nah. The big companies are already members of the Trusted Programming Alliance. They'll have the master key, which means they can certify their binaries at will. Free software developers won't have that benefit, which means they'll have to pay the certification fees, and even then, if they're competing with the TCPA member companies, they could simply find issues with the free code and refuse to certify it at all.
There is no solid distinction between memory and storage. HDD space is memory. RAM can be storage (ever hear of solid state or non-volatile RAM?). You might infer that storage is of a more permenent nature than memory, but such a distinction is not explicitly stated.
Of course, since the first words out of your mouth (into your keyboard?) were that the parent and original submitter were "wimps", I'm probably just feeding a (corporate-speaking) troll.
It is on the motherboard now, but it will be in the processor. Read the TCPA FAQ if you haven't already for the details. Suffice it to say that the technology is quite evil.
Indeed. This is why I prefer a compromise: modularity. Generalization in the parent software, specialization in the modules. Plus it allows for third parties, if they so choose, to easily integrate with the parent software.
Please don't mod the parent redundant, he posted during the same minute as the previous post.
As for the subject at hand, I find Linux does well when it's built for a specific task. This task can be everyday desktop use, you just have to customize it carefully. It's when you install "generic" Linux distributions without any customizations that you might get redundant services and programs working that don't need to be.
Funny you should mention, we're talking about weighted path-finding in my C++ class right now. Why don't these map companies simply weight roads by the quality of the road itself? Why don't they let locals help with the weighted mapping, or perhaps pay a local person a small amount to mark which roads should be wholly excluded, which are through routes, which are paved, etc.? I would definitely use such a system over others, it would even be worth paying more.
If I provide a service, I have the ability to dictate my terms of service. If you break those terms of service, you are abusing it and are liable for damages caused by your neglect. It's a rather simple concept that translates to the internet very easily, simply replace service with server.
Had to reply to this:...nobody with an ounce of sense uses WEP.
I use WEP but only because I don't really feel the need to upgrade my 802.11b network card to g, and AFAICT nobody has used my network without authorization.
Just FYI, there are a lot of really high quality pirated films out there. Generally if it says it's based on a screener, expect around the same quality as the DVD.
Cams can be good, I've seen some that were watchable. The really annoying part is when the pirates decide to put their little logo or letter in the corner, or even make it dance around.
Anyway, to refute your argument, screeners are generally available to reviewers while the film is still in theatres (so they can be reviewed easier). This is how there are some DVD quality pirated releases at or even, in some cases, before theatre debut. Also, I think Disney's thinking here is that people would find it more convenient to go buy the DVD than to pirate the film, while if the film is only available in theatres, it may be more convenient to download rather than actually take the trip to the theatre and pay the outrageous prices.
Personally, I rent much more than buying DVDs or going to the theatre anyway, so the point is still moot. Disney should look into technologies to allow people to buy or view a digital, downloadable / streamed version of a film; this way, they could control the price, distribution, and quality of the film, while satisfying those of us who would want to download it anyway.
I honestly don't think that trolls of that nature make up the majority of the Slashdot readership and certainly not the majority of subscribers, who are the only ones who can currently tag. The point is moot.
According to a sibling post, I'm a moron, but I've never had a problem with GoDaddy in the two domains I've registered with them, one of which I've had for about four years now. That said, I've never had to call their customer service line or email them.
Amen to that. Game music remixes are free, new, usually high quality tracks that are easy to download. OCRemix and recently VGMix have been gaining percentage on my playlist for a while.
Ever since the beta, I've been hearing nothing but bad experiences with Blizzard's customer service team / GMs on the internet. IMHO staff's willingness to work with the players is one of the main factors that determine the overall quality of an MMORPG. And frankly, any online game that values time spent doing something over all else to the extent that botting would gain players a huge advantage over anyone else isn't a game I want to be playing anyway.
And I think gay marriage is not a guaranteed freedom in the Constitution. (Perhaps there are other reasons for permittting it however.)
That's your opinion, but Bush wasn't trying to promote discussion about it, or make it a guaranteed freedom, he was trying to make it the first act by the general public actively forbidden by the Constitution. Amendments are not places to put laws (as evidenced by failures such as prohibition), they're for checks and balances to keep government working for the people.
Slashdot Mirror
Overclocking is done through the motherboard, not the actual RAM chip. It might, however, be possible (though probably prohibitively expensive) for them to create a second chip map for the review chips that would value speed above long-lasting reliability.
Nah. The big companies are already members of the Trusted Programming Alliance. They'll have the master key, which means they can certify their binaries at will. Free software developers won't have that benefit, which means they'll have to pay the certification fees, and even then, if they're competing with the TCPA member companies, they could simply find issues with the free code and refuse to certify it at all.
Wow! Where can I pay AOL to get my spam company on that list?
There is no solid distinction between memory and storage. HDD space is memory. RAM can be storage (ever hear of solid state or non-volatile RAM?). You might infer that storage is of a more permenent nature than memory, but such a distinction is not explicitly stated.
Of course, since the first words out of your mouth (into your keyboard?) were that the parent and original submitter were "wimps", I'm probably just feeding a (corporate-speaking) troll.
It is on the motherboard now, but it will be in the processor. Read the TCPA FAQ if you haven't already for the details. Suffice it to say that the technology is quite evil.
One would think that shipping a HDD without an OS would be taking a step out of the process for them.
That was awesome.
Virtual +1 Underrated
(Shhh. Nobody tell him about the politics section.)
Indeed. This is why I prefer a compromise: modularity. Generalization in the parent software, specialization in the modules. Plus it allows for third parties, if they so choose, to easily integrate with the parent software.
Please don't mod the parent redundant, he posted during the same minute as the previous post.
As for the subject at hand, I find Linux does well when it's built for a specific task. This task can be everyday desktop use, you just have to customize it carefully. It's when you install "generic" Linux distributions without any customizations that you might get redundant services and programs working that don't need to be.
Random thought: Is your voice significantly higher or lower than the average population? Perhaps they're optimizing for the majority.
Funny you should mention, we're talking about weighted path-finding in my C++ class right now. Why don't these map companies simply weight roads by the quality of the road itself? Why don't they let locals help with the weighted mapping, or perhaps pay a local person a small amount to mark which roads should be wholly excluded, which are through routes, which are paved, etc.? I would definitely use such a system over others, it would even be worth paying more.
If I provide a service, I have the ability to dictate my terms of service. If you break those terms of service, you are abusing it and are liable for damages caused by your neglect. It's a rather simple concept that translates to the internet very easily, simply replace service with server.
You forgot:
9:31 - 9:34 ???
Had to reply to this: ...nobody with an ounce of sense uses WEP.
I use WEP but only because I don't really feel the need to upgrade my 802.11b network card to g, and AFAICT nobody has used my network without authorization.
Just FYI, there are a lot of really high quality pirated films out there. Generally if it says it's based on a screener, expect around the same quality as the DVD.
Cams can be good, I've seen some that were watchable. The really annoying part is when the pirates decide to put their little logo or letter in the corner, or even make it dance around.
Anyway, to refute your argument, screeners are generally available to reviewers while the film is still in theatres (so they can be reviewed easier). This is how there are some DVD quality pirated releases at or even, in some cases, before theatre debut. Also, I think Disney's thinking here is that people would find it more convenient to go buy the DVD than to pirate the film, while if the film is only available in theatres, it may be more convenient to download rather than actually take the trip to the theatre and pay the outrageous prices.
Personally, I rent much more than buying DVDs or going to the theatre anyway, so the point is still moot. Disney should look into technologies to allow people to buy or view a digital, downloadable / streamed version of a film; this way, they could control the price, distribution, and quality of the film, while satisfying those of us who would want to download it anyway.
I download my movies, you insensitive clod!
I honestly don't think that trolls of that nature make up the majority of the Slashdot readership and certainly not the majority of subscribers, who are the only ones who can currently tag. The point is moot.
According to a sibling post, I'm a moron, but I've never had a problem with GoDaddy in the two domains I've registered with them, one of which I've had for about four years now. That said, I've never had to call their customer service line or email them.
Personally, my favorite part of the article was the top bit that said Source: Microsoft Corp.
So basically, they plan to set up a domain and install phpBB?
:^P
You think Microsoft would run something on PHP?
Amen to that. Game music remixes are free, new, usually high quality tracks that are easy to download. OCRemix and recently VGMix have been gaining percentage on my playlist for a while.
Ever since the beta, I've been hearing nothing but bad experiences with Blizzard's customer service team / GMs on the internet. IMHO staff's willingness to work with the players is one of the main factors that determine the overall quality of an MMORPG. And frankly, any online game that values time spent doing something over all else to the extent that botting would gain players a huge advantage over anyone else isn't a game I want to be playing anyway.
And I think gay marriage is not a guaranteed freedom in the Constitution. (Perhaps there are other reasons for permittting it however.)
That's your opinion, but Bush wasn't trying to promote discussion about it, or make it a guaranteed freedom, he was trying to make it the first act by the general public actively forbidden by the Constitution. Amendments are not places to put laws (as evidenced by failures such as prohibition), they're for checks and balances to keep government working for the people.