Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Navigation a Real Crackpot!

debest writes "What happens when your satellite navigation system in your car gives you bad advice on which road you should take? In Britain, these systems have been directing drivers down a road near the (aptly named) town of Crackpot that is strewn with boulders and has an unprotected 100ft dropoff on one side! The locals are worried someone's going to go off the edge."

230 comments

  1. What to do: by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Treat it for depression, give it plenty of (if its voice command) encouraging words or (if its tap-n-go) a good rub, but be sure to keep an eye on it; its obviously has suicidal tendancies.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:What to do: by Alias777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good advice by the aptly named Doctor Eggman

    2. Re:What to do: by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      It's obvious that this is a computer malfunction. They'll have to disconnect the logic circuits of their Saab 9000 before it terminates any further life functions.

  2. What worries me.... by pranay · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is why are the british drivers punching in "crackpot" as their destination? Agreed that GPS Nav works like magic, but this is too much optimism. What did they expect, a list of all local crack joints with directions?

    1. Re:What worries me.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      They're probably going somewhere completely different..

      My satnav is keeps telling me to make uturns despite the fact that I'm going the fastest and shortest route to me destination. Plus the fact that uturns are illegal on that road...

      Basically they're a bit naff for short distances. Going between cities is OK but I always switch mine off for the last few miles.

    2. Re:What worries me.... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Or you could just ignore the autorouting and use it as a map showing your current location and direction...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:What worries me.... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Going between cities is OK but I always switch mine off for the last few miles.

      Which makes the whole thing kinda pointless, as the "last few miles" is where it would be most useful, if it actually worked.

    4. Re:What worries me.... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Informative
      What did they expect, a list of all local crack joints with directions?

      In the UK, a crackpot is more traditionally someone who would be regarded as just past "eccentric". The woman with 86 cats in a one room apartment who yells at you out her window would be a "crackpot".

      Stuart
      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    5. Re:What worries me.... by cyclomedia · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=crackpot &ll=54.346352,-2.046547&spn=0.251346,0.684586

      as you can see crackpot is somewhere between the yellow road and the red one, presumably its sending them across the gap instead of around because it's shorter even if the track is marked as 10mph, as that's a long way around

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    6. Re:What worries me.... by orcrist · · Score: 1

      In the UK, a crackpot is more traditionally someone who would be regarded as just past "eccentric".

      In the U.S. as well, though it is archaic enough that you will generally only find it in literature. This isn't one of those British English vs. U.S. English cases. Either the GP was ignoring that definition of the word or he just isn't aware of it himself. If it is the latter, I blame it on the poor literacy of the Internet generation ;-) Now it looks like they can't even read a map :-O

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    7. Re:What worries me.... by evilandi · · Score: 1

      drivers punching in "crackpot" as their destination?

      They're not. The navigation systems are using Crackpot as a waypoint on a calculated "shortest route" between two other points - most likely between Liverpool and Newcastle.

      North Yorkshire is a rural hilly area with few roads, which takes up most of central northern England. It is moorland - vast grassy hills, nearly mountains, which are so steep they cannot be cultivated for agriculture, and are left for sheep grazing.

      See this map showing the lack of roads in central northern England.

      Basically if you are heading from Liverpool to Newcastle, you can either take a massive detour to use the motorways (interstates), or you can go cross-country on rural roads. It would seem that in this case the satellite systems are picking roads which are significantly more rural than the drivers were expecting.

      But at least now those townies know that some country folk actually do need 4x4s. The Crackpots, anyway ;-) (Disclaimer: I am a UK rural resident and 1.3litre-engine 4x4 driver)

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    8. Re:What worries me.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Is why are the british drivers punching in "crackpot" as their destination?

      Indeed, when "Cheddar Gorge" is so much more tempting.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:What worries me.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I've heard the US Coast guard had to "tweak" the coordinates on some of their buoys to keep boaters navigating by GPS from running into them. Apparently some yachts are equipped with autopilots that can navigate to a series of GPS waypoints.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:What worries me.... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      The woman with 86 cats in a one room apartment who yells at you out her window would be a "crackpot".
       
      You call her crackpot, I call her mum.

    11. Re:What worries me.... by rthille · · Score: 1

      In my college years, the sailing instructor talked about two guys who were hired to deliver a boat to Dana Point. They were coming to Dana Point from the north, set the autopilot to the harbor entry bouy. Unfortunately for the boat owner or their insurance, the actual Point (landform) from which the city takes it name was between them and the entry bouy. Hillarity ensued...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    12. Re:What worries me.... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      They'll probably get good directions to the British Institute for Psychoceramics...

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  3. Cooter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""What happens when your satellite navigation system in your car gives you bad advice on which road you should take?"

    Not much different than that gas station attendant five miles back.

    1. Re:Cooter by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Except that Cooter isn't repeating "turn left now" in soothing tones via the hifi.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Cooter by x2A · · Score: 1

      You get to make a new series: "When navigation GOES WRONG!"

      "The worlds worst nagivation errors!"

      ugh

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Cooter by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1

      Presented by Captain/Sherriff/Mayor/President John Bunnell, and his corset.

      "These sat-navs thought they were going to take the drivers to their destination, but this time they're going straight... to jail".

      etc.

  4. Strange progress of technology by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on, if back in the early 1980s you could get a sentient talking car, then why in 2006 do we settle for these simple guidance systems that are so limited they could get us killed?

    1. Re:Strange progress of technology by dogwelder99 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, did you include that referral-payola Amazon link as an example of deceptive navigation technology?

    2. Re:Strange progress of technology by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      As this is one of those posts meant to be funny through a pity saying, with the punchline coming in a link, I had to link somewhere. And since there's no official Knight Rider website, and linking to Wikipedia makes me feel ill, I thought the DVD set would be a good enough place to end up.

    3. Re:Strange progress of technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      linking to Wikipedia makes me feel ill
      First comment from a Britannica employee I've seen on Slashdot. How does it feel to be downsized?

      Here's a much more informative talking car link.

    4. Re:Strange progress of technology by HTL2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why does linking to Wikipedia make you feel ill ?

      Scary thing is, only one of those is a redlink...

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    5. Re:Strange progress of technology by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sentient?! Pfft. My car didn't know the difference between a door and a jar...

    6. Re:Strange progress of technology by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Great, now some schmuck is going to create an article for "does".

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    7. Re:Strange progress of technology by uncadonna · · Score: 1
      --
      mt
    8. Re:Strange progress of technology by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Someone did and redicted it towards "deer".

      Looks like it's time for a disambig page?

    9. Re:Strange progress of technology by Baricom · · Score: 1

      You either didn't understand the question or completely ignored it.

      Here's the non-affiliate link.

    10. Re:Strange progress of technology by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      You know, items don't cost the buyer any differently whether they are ordered through referral links or through direct links, and Slashdot has a long history of permitting (in some cases, even encouraging) referral links.

    11. Re:Strange progress of technology by alerante · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're all green. (Except the one I clicked on, which is now black.)

    12. Re:Strange progress of technology by fltchr · · Score: 1

      because we are starting to rely on a single source of information. as diverse as that source may be, in the case of wikipedia, it still causes illness.

    13. Re:Strange progress of technology by MrZaius · · Score: 1
  5. Re:Reality TV by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You got it all wrong. The satellites have figured out that we're stopping their direct influence with our tinfoil hats, so now they have to resort to more subtle means to rid the planet of human vermin.

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
  6. They really have 2 options: by temojen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Put up a sign reading "Don't go down this road, even if your GPS tells you to; Dangerous conditions ahead".

    2) Stabilize the slope above and install a guard rail.

    1. Re:They really have 2 options: by demonbug · · Score: 4, Informative
      1) Put up a sign reading "Don't go down this road, even if your GPS tells you to; Dangerous conditions ahead".

      2) Stabilize the slope above and install a guard rail.



      1) good idea - but they're going to also need to provide directions for an alternate route

      2) This sounds like a rather remote, extremely lightly travelled route - it may not be economically feasible to install a guard rail and "stabilize the slope" (which could cost tens of thousands or millions of dollars). Sounds like it is just a back-country dirt road that wasn't designed for through traffic.

    2. Re:They really have 2 options: by binarybum · · Score: 1

      what!!? no ..., no PROFIT!! ?

          you must be new here.

      btw, "But we get a lot of sales reps in posh cars coming and they get so cross" hmm, wonder what the sales reps are selling in crackpot?

      --
      ôó
    3. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably a. GPS units or b. crack!

    4. Re:They really have 2 options: by lubricated · · Score: 1

      >> extremely lightly travelled route

      It's either an extremely lightly traveled route, and there is no problem, or more and more people are traveling on it and it is a problem.

      Just about every road in Seattle wasn't built to take that traffic it's getting but that doesn't mean people shouldn't try to improve the situation.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about every road in Seattle wasn't built to take that traffic it's getting but that doesn't mean people shouldn't try to improve the situation.

      Yeah but how do you get people out of their cars?

    6. Re:They really have 2 options: by x2A · · Score: 1

      Because driving over steep edges is just one of natures thinning out devices, doing so would be anti-evolutionary (watch the ID folk go do it now ;-)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    7. Re:They really have 2 options: by lubricated · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> Yeah but how do you get people out of their cars?

      Gta style. You open the door and pull them out.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    8. Re:They really have 2 options: by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      >> 1) Put up a sign reading "Don't go down this road,
      >> even if your GPS tells you to; Dangerous conditions ahead".
      >
      > 1) good idea - but they're going to also need to provide
      > directions for an alternate route

      Re. the grandparent's post...from the article:

      > Grinton Parish Council has now asked North Yorkshire County Council
      > to look into the problem and see if safety signs can be erected.
      >
      > A county council spokesman said: "We will look at the signing issue
      > and any appropriate action that needs to be taken will be taken."

      Re. the parent's post...if you just ignore a turning and keep going straight down a main road, then all the SatNavs I've met (not many, admittedly) will then reroute and take you down another turning a bit further down the road, rather than yelling at you to hang a U-ey and take the turning you just missed.

    9. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You never said a truer word - it's an appalingly bad road that I have the dubious pleasure of driving occassionally....

      http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=397500&y=4 96500&z=3&sv=crackpot&st=3&tl=Crackpot,+North+York shire+%5BCity/Town/Village%5D&searchp=newsearch.sr f&mapp=newmap.srf

    10. Re:They really have 2 options: by Asm-Coder · · Score: 1

      Thank you for providing the simplest answer. Maybe some of yes need to be reminded to KISS!

    11. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I call it the three 'g's. You just grab, get in, and go!" - WCTR News

    12. Re:They really have 2 options: by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      3) Set up a toll booth on the road. Profit.

    13. Re:They really have 2 options: by locofungus · · Score: 1

      1) Doesn't work:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4867880. stm
      (signs telling people not to park where it floods - people still don't move their cars even when the locals tell them it will flood)

      2) Why? There are plenty of good roads. The surface quality of British roads is deteriorating (and due to our below freezing nights and above freezing days in winter they have always suffered a lot from frost damage in winter anyway) but, on the whole, so long as you stay more than about 75cm from the curb or edge of the road where there is no pavement (sidewalk) the surface is usually perfectly servicable. (I cycle almost everywhere and so long as you keep of the cycle routes and cycle lanes and on the road proper - cycle routes are usually gravel tracks and cycle lanes are usually the 1m of surface right at the edge of the road where potholes breed - you can easily and comfortably cycle at 30km/h (20mph) on 22mm tyres at 120psi - hills permitting :-) )[1]

      For all intents and purposes, you can get from anywhere to anywhere in England on metalled roads. (I'd guess that's true for the whole of the UK but I don't really know Scotland outside of the major cities.

      [1] The westbound carriageway of the Euston Road outside Kings Cross is the exception that proves this rule
      http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=530 318&Y=182951&A=Y&Z=1

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    14. Re:They really have 2 options: by gronofer · · Score: 1
      "They" also have a third option: do nothing and say it's somebody elses problem.

      The article says the navigation provider is removing the route from its system, so that should fix it.

    15. Re:They really have 2 options: by Kevertje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) good idea - but they're going to also need to provide directions for an alternate route

      Why would that be necessary? The people are only going there because their GPS device is telling them to. One of the nice things of GPS devices is that they recalculate your route when you deviate from it.

      Now, if the problem was related to route planners instead of GPS, you'd have a point.

    16. Re:They really have 2 options: by morie · · Score: 1

      Without the 4. ???????, where is the fun?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    17. Re:They really have 2 options: by mpe · · Score: 1

      1) Doesn't work: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4867880. stm (signs telling people not to park where it floods - people still don't move their cars even when the locals tell them it will flood)

      The rising cost of insurance, for drivers do don't bother to read these signs, should have the desired effect eventually.

    18. Re:They really have 2 options: by mrRay720 · · Score: 1

      // 2) This sounds like a rather remote, extremely lightly travelled route - it may not be economically feasible to install a guard rail and "stabilize the slope" (which could cost tens of thousands or millions of dollars). Sounds like it is just a back-country dirt road that wasn't designed for through traffic.

      Nah it wouldn't cost a single dollar - we have our own currency over here, thankyouverymuch.

      That said, you're right, and the best option is probably a big "OMG WTF THIS IS A DANGEROUS ROAD - THERE BE DRAGONS" sign.

      You missed my preferred option number 3 though - set up some webcams and register www.watchpeoplefalloffaroadhahafunny.com

    19. Re:They really have 2 options: by hokeyru · · Score: 1

      3) Augment your gps navigation system with real-world, real-time data via digitally-signed radio messages broadcast directly from the road. If you want to give drivers nav information, you have to deliver it from the proper place, the road, and you have to get it from the proper authorities, local municipal governments.

      Local authorities using radio beacons can offer information more efficiently than any centrally-updated repository. Has a road crew shut down the road for repair? They can post a "Road shut down for repair" beacon. Nav systems with uplinks could send that information along to the central servers. Is the bridge iced over? Sensors in the bridge could automatically detect icy conditions and broadcast the proper radio message. Speed reduction zone ahead? Beacon. Tractor trailer flipped over? Beacon. You get the idea.

    20. Re:They really have 2 options: by zacronos · · Score: 1
      1) good idea - but they're going to also need to provide directions for an alternate route

      2) This sounds like a rather remote, extremely lightly travelled route - it may not be economically feasible to install a guard rail and "stabilize the slope" (which could cost tens of thousands or millions of dollars). Sounds like it is just a back-country dirt road that wasn't designed for through traffic.
      Here's a possibility that might solve 2 different problems: make it a toll road for non-residents of Crackpot. All residents could be issued a pass that makes them excempt from the toll. I know that would be a pain, but you have to live with getting a government-issued pass to get street parking where I live, so it's doable -- and anyone who doesn't drive on that road (maybe most of the locals?) wouldn't need to bother with it.

      There are 4 good things about this:

      1) Making it a toll road might (after the information gets into the database) redirect GPS routed-traffic another way, since I think the algorithms usually avoid tolls.

      2) If it doesn't direct traffic away, then the generated income would perhaps make it economically feasible to improve the road to conditions appropriate for the amount of traffic.

      3) If you place the toll strategically, it will slow cars down just before the most dangerous area.

      4) If it is a manned toll (though that probably increases the overhead cost of the toll itself), then the person working there could provide the warning and alternate directions.
    21. Re:They really have 2 options: by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Informative
      1) Put up a sign reading "Don't go down this road, even if your GPS tells you to; Dangerous conditions ahead".

      Actually there there is a sign. And a five-bar gate:

      Many ignore a no through road sign and open a five-bar gate before trying to continue along a gravel track linking Swaledale and Wensleydale.
    22. Re:They really have 2 options: by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It is a public right of way, so they aren't allowed to put notices up saying people aren't allowed on it.

      I suppose they could put a notice up saying "unsuitable for anything other than tractors and chelsea tractors".

    23. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you appriciate the nature of the road in question. Remeber that this is England, where things are a) smaller, b) older. The road almost certainly only exists because of a 500 year old (i.e. pre car) charter saying people could cross the local lord's land there. It's probably closer to what in the US would be thought of as a disused driveway.

    24. Re:They really have 2 options: by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      yea, but if the alternative routing is at least 50 miles away, it won't recalculate for a long time,
      it'll just suggest u-turns- and the best possible 'recalculate' may not be obvious- which way to go?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    25. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then, they deserve what they get. Good candidates for the Darwin Awards.

    26. Re:They really have 2 options: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to be paying for it with your own currency, thank you very much, shouldn't the website be www.watchpeoplefalloffaroadhahafunny.co.uk?

    27. Re:They really have 2 options: by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether such a thing would be legal in the UK. It's (presumably) a public right of way, so it would be illegal to block traffic, and EU laws are very restrictive about toll roads. I don't think it would be legal to charge a toll on this sort of road, and even if it would be, the owner would be limited to how much he could charge.

    28. Re:They really have 2 options: by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      A better option would have been to install a webcam and sell the DVD version.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    29. Re:They really have 2 options: by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Ha, a survivor reality show with unwitting participants. I think it would be quite popular.

    30. Re:They really have 2 options: by gronofer · · Score: 1
      Commuters can be quite resourceful when it comes to avoiding road blockages.

      I overhear all kinds of bizarre stories from people explaining why they are only 30 minutes late for work dispite the appalling conditions.

    31. Re:They really have 2 options: by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The ??????? happens when the lawyers get involved, after someone complains about the toll booth.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. Re:Reality TV by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey now, come on, this story is cute and funny in a safely humorous, non-tech way. I don't know about you, but I want to know about every navigation bug affecting rural UK folk. Just what I expect here at /. Boy oh boy, let me tell you about the time Yahoo! Maps told me to take the I405 instead of I5 to go to South Seattle from Lynnwood. FRONT PAGE NEWS!

    --
    A B A C A B B
  8. Too obvious to be a solution by PacoHernandez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there a reason that they haven't put a railing on the "unprotected 100ft dropoff" edge?

    1. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by Olix · · Score: 1

      Probably because the residents of the town find it funny to watch scared travelers scared crapless as they make their way along some narrow, dangerous, rocky cliffroad.

      Hey, there is never anything good to watch on TV - they have to find something to do.

    2. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes there is a reason - it's a rock-strewn farm track rather than a surfaced road and it isn't suitable for motor vehicles, and certainly isn't a through road. The error in question isn't the quality of the road or the lack of a guard rail, but the fact that the GPS systems are flagging it as a through route when it isn't.

      I've holidayed in the area regularly and once you go off the A (main) and B (narrow, usually single-lane) roads, you're on moorland, bogland and are pretty much on your own. While I can't be 100% sure whether I've been down the specific track they're talking about, I have mountain-biked down a few pretty hairy tracks near Crackpot that I know I wouldn't take a car down, specifically the ones that end in a drop, rather than have one at the side...

    3. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      That would prevent coyotes from falling !

    4. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by wantedman · · Score: 1

      It's possible that the cliff is steep for a rail.

    5. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad place to put a road then, no?

    6. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because it's not a main road. Why does there have to be a guardrail on every road somebody could go off? Here in Colorado we have lots of mountain roads with no guardrails. We would go broke installing and maintaining guardrails on every mountain road someone could go off of.
      Reminds me of a conversion I had with a buddy from New York on a 4 wheel mountain road with a cliff.
      Joe: "There's no guardrail so what happens if you go off the edge"
      Me: "You could die, so don't drive off the edge"

    7. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1
      That reminds me of driving down the length of the Baja Peninsula to La Paz in 1991 to view that year's total eclipse of the sun. It's over a thousand miles, asphalt the whole way, but the road had no centerline, no shoulders and very few guard rails. Every so often, at a sharp curve, you could peer out the window and see the remains of a car or truck that had pitched over the side. These weren't rusted out hulks either, but recent accidents. And now and then the site would be marked with one or more crosses, sometimes flowers or votive candles, as a memorial to someone who had died.

      I'm guessing there wasn't a whole lot of money to improve that road. We took those curves very, very carefully.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    8. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by rdebath · · Score: 1

      It'd a dirt road that's hundreds of years old (literally) there's more than enough tarmac in the area, drivers do not have to go of into fields. The problem is there are lots of poorer roads in the area and GPS systems don't know the difference between a poor road and a farm track.

      All the need is a sign saying:

      NOT THIS WAY, YOUR GPS IS WRONG -- RTFM! (MAP!).

    9. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Have you been to Colorado? In many areas, outside of towns, almost all of the roads have huge dropoffs, and many have occational rockslides. It's just not worth it to install rails and concrete rock barriers everywhere.

    10. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by mpe · · Score: 1

      Yes there is a reason - it's a rock-strewn farm track rather than a surfaced road and it isn't suitable for motor vehicles,

      Except possibly a real "all terrain" vehicle, which few people other than farmers are likely to have.

    11. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Every so often, at a sharp curve, you could peer out the window and see the remains of a car or truck that had pitched over the side...We took those curves very, very carefully.

      In Indonesia, they deliberately leave wrecked cars in place as reminders for the following drivers. Occasionally, if such cars are not easily spotted, they're put on top of a platform on a mast, to be more visible ;-)

    12. Re:Too obvious to be a solution by mpe · · Score: 1

      It'd a dirt road that's hundreds of years old (literally) there's more than enough tarmac in the area, drivers do not have to go of into fields. The problem is there are lots of poorer roads in the area and GPS systems don't know the difference between a poor road and a farm track.
      All the need is a sign saying:
      NOT THIS WAY, YOUR GPS IS WRONG -- RTFM! (MAP!).


      Unless it's the same map used by the makers of the GPS device which dosn't distinguish between minor roads and tracks.
      Probably is that anyone who can't recognise that the "road" isn't suitable for their vehicle probably isn't going to bother to read the sign either. There are plenty of idiots driving cars.

  9. best action to take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...put up a sign "Toll Road Ahead".

    1. Re:best action to take... by Falcon040 · · Score: 1

      "...put up a sign "Toll Road Ahead" "

      Agreed, the simplest solution is often the best!

    2. Re:best action to take... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      Or stop people and ask them, "do you want to buy some of my squirrels?"

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  10. Happens all the time by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a similar problem recently while driving through Pennsylvania. I had set my car's GPS computer to lead me to Intercourse, but no matter what I pushed it I could only reach Bird in Hand. Of course, I've had this problem with web pages on my PC at home before, so I really can't blame the mapping company.

    1. Re:Happens all the time by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a similar problem recently while driving through Pennsylvania. I had set my car's GPS computer to lead me to Intercourse, but no matter what I pushed it I could only reach Bird in Hand.

      I used to live in that general part of Pennsylvania and always chuckled looking at the map. Intercourse, Bird-in-Hand, and Mt. Joy, towns all innocuous on their own but when placed together highly sexually suggestive.

    2. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's in your hand she probably wants to go to intercourse too.

    3. Re:Happens all the time by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you really want to get to Climax, you have to go to Michigan.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean as a ./ reader you didn't end up in Blueball or Virginville? I'd think that's a time to brag!

      (And yes, those are real towns in PA - same general area too. I love where I grew up...)

    5. Re:Happens all the time by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I had almost the same problem, except I kept winding up in Blue Ball, PA!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Happens all the time by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are a lot more than that... near Intercourse, you have Paradise (naturally), as well as Leacock, Reamstown, East Petersburg, Mountville, Climax, Beaver, and of course the ever-present Blue Ball. You don't know how frustrating it is to drive out to the country, and figure you'll stop for a quick visit to Intercourse, get lost and end up in Blue Ball. and wind up ending your night with Bird in Hand.

    7. Re:Happens all the time by fbsderr0r · · Score: 1

      suprise to most people. the towns are real.
      its in PA Amish country.(Good'n Plenty had pretty good food)

      you weren't driving a horse and buggy were you?

    8. Re:Happens all the time by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Or if you're female you can go to Dildo Street in Puerto Rico.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    9. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      near Intercourse, you have Paradise (naturally), as well as Leacock, Reamstown, East Petersburg, Mountville, Climax, Beaver

      is that anywhere near Mianus ?

    10. Re:Happens all the time by schnits0r · · Score: 1
    11. Re:Happens all the time by jason+ward · · Score: 1

      There's one in Saskatchewan as well.

    12. Re:Happens all the time by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny
      is that anywhere near Mianus ?


      Nope, 'taint.
    13. Re:Happens all the time by antic · · Score: 1
      http://www.k12.nf.ca/woodlandelem/our_school/dildo .html

      Our community of Dildo is situated in a deep narrow cove at the entrance point of Dildo Arm, Dildo and South Dildo. It is at the South side of Trinity Bay, some 96 km. from St. John's. This community is close to good fishing grounds and the cod fishery was always the basis for this community. Later in the twentieth century, this community became a flourishing whaling community. A museum in the nearby town of South Dildo shows the history of whaling. Our school is in Dildo.
      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    14. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the Catskills of NY, there is a steep hiking trail that zig zags up a cliff that is listed in the Tiger database as a road... and it appears in driving directions on Mapquest!

    15. Re:Happens all the time by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

      is that anywhere near Mianus ?

      just around the corner...

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  11. So what they're saying is..... by rune2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Crackpot there's more than one way to go off the deep end! /rimshot

    1. Re:So what they're saying is..... by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Get out.

  12. Typical mapper issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are a couple of problems with these things, both familiar to MapQuest users.

    1) Things change. New roads (sometimes whole communities) get built, and there is some latency in getting that updated data where it can be used by your GPS-mapper (whether in your car or on the web).

    2) Driving-direction algorithims are good, but not flawless. MapQuest, for example, provides driving directions that will usually get you where you want to go, but may have you take an odd route to get there.

    The bottom line: If you expect your Tom-Tom (or whatever) to magically do all of your thinking for you, you'll eventually wind up going over an 'unexpected' cliff ...

    1. Re:Typical mapper issues by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TomTom are *really* bad though. They're riding high as the most common GPS in the UK.

      Unfortunately their maps are filled with obvious errors, and they ignore people who correct them (it's not uncommon for roads to be 10 years out of date on their maps... they've been told - repeatedly - about these errors but each time a map upgrade comes out no fixes have been done. Add to that the fact the map upgrades are not free and TT are ripe for being murdered by the competition..)

    2. Re:Typical mapper issues by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Damn right! I've personally fucked myself with MapQuest. Two things happend to me while driving to a clients house plotted with MQ.

      1. Took the shortest path that cross a bridge over a bayou. Problem: the bridge hasn't even been fucking built yet. The road was closed off. Worse yet, it didn't look like a bridge would ever be built from the looks of it.

      2. Driving to a new residential area. Problem: Road that was supposed to continue on but was instead turned into a Cul de sac.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Typical mapper issues by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Unfortunately their maps are filled with obvious errors,

      Copyright traps?

    4. Re:Typical mapper issues by Ken+Hall · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure exactly who made the system in my new Honda, but in the six months I've had it, I've found at least four fairly major errors. The one in the article would have been easy to solve though: There's a button on mine labeled "detour" that calculates an alternate route if you can't follow the suggested one.

      As for updating the database, well, the company has a mechanism for reporting errors, but they only distribute new DVDs once a year or so, and they charge $180. They don't give discounts if you find bugs in their product.

    5. Re:Typical mapper issues by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      TomTom is not ignoring them it's their map data source.

      Navteq is the absolute crappiest Mapping data source company and has beenthat way for decades. I remember way back in the AutoPC days their dataset was the only avaialable and it was total crap. They ignored all notices of bad and incorrect data and do so to this day.

      Hell the government free TigerLine dataset is far more useful than the professional Mapping datasets.

      I find that the el-cheapo Delorme software packages that run on a laptop and have a cheezy usb GPS far outpace the $3000+ in dash navigation systems with thier $250+ yearly update fees.

      I have owned the GM system, the Pioneer System, AutoPC and other high end nav setups... the $100.00 software+GPS on a $300.00 laptop is better.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Typical mapper issues by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Tiger/Line sucks, there is no comparison between it and even the worst professional cartography.

    7. Re:Typical mapper issues by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      I usually ask for directions and an address. I put the address into Mapquest and Google Earth, then I compare it with the directions. Works for me. It helps that since I live in Washington we never build roads, so there's nothing to update. Plus, if you know an address and are passingly familiar with the local roads here, you can usually find your way anywhere. The first two or three numbers of the house number are always a street or avenue number. The street listed is the nearest cross street to the house or place of business. Say what you will about the post office, but the American addressing system is wonderful. In some cities here, you can also find your way around by looking for block numbers as well as street names, since they're all named.

      I just wish that this state had made the road signs actually readable from more than 5 feet away. It would really eliminate panic stops.

      --
      SRSLY.
  13. Map software problem.. by Achra · · Score: 1

    I live in noplace, TN.. I got sent down a dirt road via mapquest onetime. Eventually, I came out at my destination. The point is, that the map software only sees roads.. Not the quality of the roads. Really, ideally, these kinds of roads wouldn't have made their way into the map database at all.

    --
    Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    1. Re:Map software problem.. by mzwaterski · · Score: 4, Informative
      I know my GPS sees road types because I can tell it to exclude some road types from a particular trip. For example, I can say: no highways, no dirt roads, etc...

      I have a Garmin Quest.

    2. Re:Map software problem.. by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      You're lucky. I live in noplace, Tn, as well... and they don't even recognize my ROAD on mapquest. At all. According to them, I don't exist.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    3. Re:Map software problem.. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends. For example, years ago I had a rental car from Hertz with a GPS. I was surprised to discover that the GPS did not have the road that my parents live on.

      I figure I can probably find "Main Street" in a small town. I don't need a GPS to tell me that. However, I could probably use some help finding "Baker Hill Road."

      That said, one of the odd tricks about roads is that if nobody lives on a road, generally the town doesn't maintain it and stops becoming a road. You can find all sorts of "used-to-be" roads in rural New England. They're usually fun to drive along because you never know where you'll end up.

    4. Re:Map software problem.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only think that your Garmin can see what type of roads there are. The fact that it has an option in a menu means it has some information and will use what it has, but I have personal experience with a Garmin Streetpilot 2620 that says otherwise.

      I was on a trip delivering furniture I sold on eBay along the East coast. I had my GPS set to use only roads for large trucks (I am assuming that would avoid dirt roads when possible). I stayed at a relatives house in Big Ugly, West Virginia -- Actually Leets, WV, but that part is known as Big Ugly. When I went to get back on the interstate it gives me a pretty direct route along a road called "Creek Bottom Rd." Sounds nice, but the road narrowed and narrowed and before I know it turns into a dirt road. It has been so narrow for so long I have no chance of backing up the 27' box truck when the road slopes down into an actual creek bottom.

      Being a reckless 24 year old and assuming that the wise Garmin map people would not lead me astray I take the creek bottom and am rolling along when the exit back onto a decent road is too steep for the truck - the back of the truck scraped along the creek bed and then got stuck. There I was, somewhere outside of Big Ugly, West Virginia with no cell reception and a box truck stuck in a creek bed. Luckily after a few hours a guy stopped to help who just happened to have a chain in the back of his 4x4 pickup. The couple of hours had given me enough time to dig enough out from under the truck and he pulled me out. I found out later there was another way that was a tiny bit longer, but had a higher speed limit and no creeks.

      So, just because there is an option to avoid dirt roads does not mean that ALL dirt roads are recognized.

    5. Re:Map software problem.. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention, we're talking about weighted path-finding in my C++ class right now. Why don't these map companies simply weight roads by the quality of the road itself? Why don't they let locals help with the weighted mapping, or perhaps pay a local person a small amount to mark which roads should be wholly excluded, which are through routes, which are paved, etc.? I would definitely use such a system over others, it would even be worth paying more.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    6. Re:Map software problem.. by poslfit · · Score: 1

      "The software sees only roads"... that's a problem right there. I tried out the navigation system in a friend's Prius at Orient Point, Long Island, asking it how to get to New London, CT. It persisted in telling me I had to turn the car around and drive all the way around Long Island Sound until the ferry docked at New London and we drove back onto dry land again.

  14. Wow by abscissa · · Score: 5, Funny

    If a computer tells you to jump off a cliff, would you do it?

    1. Re:Wow by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      What type of computer? Running what OS? Is it an open source program?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Wow by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      Re:Wow (Score:2, Insightful) Only on Slashdot...

    3. Re:Wow by zanglang · · Score: 1

      Is it running Windows?

  15. Hypothetical conversation by xIcemanx · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't drive there! The road ends on a cliff and we'll all fall off and die horribly!" "But the GPS directions say to go that way!" "Oh, in that case, no problem. "

  16. Similar Story by SloWave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some time back when GPS's in cars were fairly new, I rented a Hertz car with a GPS while on a business trip to Colorado. I didn't ask for the GPS, they just gave it to me. At the end of my trip I decided to try out the GPS, so I programmed it to return me to the Colorado Springs airport. I missed the first turn to the airport but no problem, the GPS said it had an alternate route. So I followed the route until it said I had reached my destination. All I could see however was miles of nothing and a big chain link fence. The GPS insisted I was at the airport however. Finally I dug out the rental car map and it showed me that the GPS had led me to the back side of the airport. I almost missed my flight because of that stupid GPS.

    1. Re:Similar Story by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      Exact same thing happened to my girlfriend at John Wayne Airport with Google Maps directions.

    2. Re:Similar Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically you were at the airport.

    3. Re:Similar Story by AaronW · · Score: 1

      That sounds like my experience with the Hertz "N^Heverlost" system. At the time I was in Austin, Tx and we needed to go back to the airport, so we went through the menus and chose "airport" as the destination. It directed us to the old airport which had been closed for several years. We finally figured out we had to tell the system we wanted to go back home and it directed us correctly.

      Fortunately we gave ourselves plenty of time.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    4. Re:Similar Story by Persol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Odd timing.

      I'm currently in Pueblo, CO at a test site 30 miles outside town. There's only one paved road to the facility and it's from Pueblo.

      I usually fly into Denver, drove through the Springs, to Pueblo and then head out to the site. Simple trip, just get on 25-S and drive. Get off on exit 101A and drive ~30 miles.

      Well, I wanted to test my new gps. It had me drive down to the Co Springs airport and then take a ~30 mile dirt road. Actually got me there quicker, but the facility keeps that gate locked :/

    5. Re:Similar Story by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Well, if you've ever been to Denver, you know that the airport is essentially one big building surrounded by literally miles and miles of nothing.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    6. Re:Similar Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You silly man! Where were your wirecutters?

      At the very least you could have found a secret ramp and go all Dukes of Hazard.

    7. Re:Similar Story by syousef · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if this sounds harsh but technically you almost missed your flight because you were inept with the technology.

      You'd never used this technology before, had no training in using it, don't know its limitations and your test was to rely on it? Gimme a break. You should have punched it into the GPS, pulled over, and then compared with the paper based maps. A few minutes checking over your assumption and you'd not have been anywhere near as late.

      Would you pick a random web page and believe everything you read on it too?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:Similar Story by Onno+Hovers · · Score: 1

      GPS is not always accurate. GPS can fail. And if something is disturbing the signal of the GPS, you are SOL. High-end systems also have a gyro that keeps track of the movements of the car. These systems are more accurate.

    9. Re:Similar Story by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Would you pick a random web page and believe everything you read on it too?

      Ironic, such advice on slashdot.

    10. Re:Similar Story by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      But GPS has nothing to do with bad maps. The "Global Positioning System" just calculates where it's antenna is. That is all.

      Anything like poor directions, leading you down bad roads, etc. has everything to do with the quality of maps and choice of the proper graph traversal algorithms (but mostly the quality of the maps) and nothing to do with the GPS Receiver.

      "GPS" doesn't lead you anywhere. GPS tells the rest of the device (or yourself) where it is. That is all. Do not blame the GPS on something that has nothing to do with the GPS infrastructure.

      Yes, the GPS receiver can fail, but if it does, it is highly unlikely it will report a valid position anywhere other than where it is. If the system fails, the receiver reports no valid position.

      Systems with the gyro (or other inertial sensors) use them to "fill in the gaps" when GPS is not a viable solution, but only for relatively short times. Variations in movement and inaccuracies or manufacturing differences mean that inertial tracking systems will drift "off course" over time, but not in so much time that it won't get lost while going through a tunnel or under a highway overpass, etc. Once GPS (which is an absolution positioning tool) again becomes viable, the inertial track (which is a relative positioning tool) is corrected to the true absolute location.

      But having accurate map data is essential.

    11. Re:Similar Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd never used this technology before, had no training in using it, don't know its limitations and your test was to rely on it? Gimme a break. You should have punched it into the GPS, pulled over, and then compared with the paper based maps. A few minutes checking over your assumption and you'd not have been anywhere near as late.

      Damn. I used to use Slashdot to get time away from my wife.

    12. Re:Similar Story by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I dunno; a quick glance over the messages here show that the overwhelming majority express some sort of disagreement with their parent. I'd conclude that at least the /. readers who deign to post messages are highly unlikely to take what they read at face value.

      You may also notice a certain amount of self-reference in this message ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    13. Re:Similar Story by SloWave · · Score: 1

      Holy smokes I feel like I just dissed Macintoshes or something. Are people really that sensitive about their GPS's? I mean the term 'GPS' in the sense as they are marketed which includes the receiver, processor, mapping engine, routing software etc.
      Next time M$ Windows blue-screens because I didn't breath right or something I'll remember it is because I'm technically inept and don't understand technology. Sheesh - some peoples kids.

  17. OnStar and the eternal flame of endearment... by geodescent · · Score: 1

    I bet that won't be in an OnStar ad anytime soon. Too bad.

  18. Sometimes you make it to easy by funkmasterbillis · · Score: 2, Funny

    >I had set my car's GPS computer to lead me to Intercourse

    maybe you should try match.com, I hear that works pretty well. It must be better than your gps, at least.

    --
    This adspace for sale! Inquire within!
  19. serious??? by seventhc · · Score: 1

    Are the people taking this road all getting directions from a GPS??? Granted a GPS in a car isn't uncommon, but I dont know anybody who has one. I have a GPS, sadly not 1 in my truck. So would taking it out of the data base really help? I could be wrong, but I find it hard to beleive that everyone taking that road is being told by their GPS, also...for such a well traveled road, why not get rid of the bolders, pave it and put up a gaurd rail. Just a thought.

    --
    'sig' deleted due to the stupidity of it's 'nature'
    1. Re:serious??? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      GPS are now in around 10% of cars in the UK and that's growing *really* fast.

    2. Re:serious??? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Are the people taking this road all getting directions from a GPS

      95% of them, probably. As the article says, they get a lot of sales reps and once an Argos delivery truck. A huge percentage of folks like that will be using GPS.

  20. Too obvious to be a solution (indeed) by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind this is the country that gave the world Charles Darwin. It's obviously a form of... encoraged natural selection.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  21. Re:Reality TV by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    Maps told me to take the I405 instead of I5 to go to South Seattle from Lynnwood. FRONT PAGE NEWS!

    That's actually a good idea some parts of the day. I5 backs up when it goes to 2 lanes in central Seattle.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  22. Yeah, sure... by Winlin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The locals are so worried about this. Just like, in the days of sailing ships, the villagers who put up fake lights were very worried that some ship might run aground on the rocks. I say we see who in this village is hacking the GPS. First place to look...the suspiciously wellstocked local secondhand store.

    1. Re:Yeah, sure... by Zentac · · Score: 0

      You watched way to much "League of Gentlemen" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0184135/

  23. Rat Race by porkThreeWays · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew I should've bought a squirrel

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  24. Business Opportunity ! by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I say buy the parcel of land at the bottom of the 100ft dropoff and set up an auto wrecking yard. Put up sign half way down - "Welcome to Crackpot Auto Wrecking"

    1. Re:Business Opportunity ! by the-amazing-blob · · Score: 1
      I say buy the parcel of land at the bottom of the 100ft dropoff and set up an auto wrecking yard. Put up sign half way down - "Welcome to Crackpot Auto Wrecking"
      Then charge $100 per car.
  25. Set untarmaced roads to 1mph by cootuk · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is fairly local to me. This is out in the wilds where the decent A road takes the long way round. The problem seems to be that untarmaced roads are set to about 10mph average spped by default in a lot of routing software, and most people select 'fastest route'. Simply by setting untarmaced roads to 1mph you can avoid some of this silly routing. Plus using a bit of common sense.

  26. language barrier by east+coast · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here in the US it's called "crackhouse" not "crackpot".

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:language barrier by Jedi+Lofty · · Score: 1

      Actually in the UK "crackpot" is a term used to describe someone who is a bit mad/insane/stupid

      --
      - There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't
    2. Re:language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention world: the moron who posted the parent is not your typical American nerd. Even your typical non-nerd American isn't so ignorant of his own language.

      "Crackpot" means exactly the same thing in American as in English; to wit:

      crackpot
      n.
      An eccentric person, especially one with bizarre ideas.

      adj.
      Foolish; harebrained: a crackpot notion.


      The parent poster has obviously been in too many crack houses... or even lives in one.

    3. Re:language barrier by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Attention world: the moron who posted the parent does not have a sense of humor.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  27. Turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My system just told me I should have taken a left turn at Albuquerque!

    1. Re:Turn by umrgregg · · Score: 1

      Eh, whaddup doc?

      --
      NMG
  28. Re:Reality TV by linebackn · · Score: 1

    The point of this story is people blindly placing their trust in technology. People seem to have this strange idea that computers are infallible and anything that a computer tells them is always going to magically be 100% accurate.

    They don't think for themselves any more, they never question the almighty computer. They throw away their pencil and paper, and rely entirely on their computer. And if the computer is wrong or not available these people may lead themselves right in to disaster. And the potential for this happening is increasing every day.

  29. Crackpot Navagation systems by Antipas · · Score: 1

    Hmmm always have to wonder about a place named crackpot, anyway this is actually a common problem with in car navigation, I have had my navigation system try to send me on an impossible route, i.e. roads blocked moved construction...

      I would trade my navigation system for Night Vision display in the dash any day.

  30. I'm goin for it... by XdevXnull · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Crackpot, GPS drives you!

    --
    "I'm a Laver, not a Phyto[plankton]"
    1. Re:I'm goin for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er,no In Soviet America,GPS drives YOU In Soviet Russia,YOU drive GPS

  31. Re:Reality TV by x2A · · Score: 1

    "is people blindly placing their trust in technology"

    What... you believe what the website said? :-p

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  32. Simple Map Data problem by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    Since most navigation companies buy their map databases from someone else they'll have to pass the info on to their supplier and maybe make a tweak to their local copy. It might be as simple as classifying the road as "dirt" vs "county road" to keep it from being used as part of a route.

    However, that will only fix things for the people who get the next version of the updated maps. Customers driving around with 4 year old maps in their built-in navigation systems will still be SOL.

    So, as someone suggested, a sign is the best and quickest solution. Even the quickest response by all the various Nav system manufacturers and map data suppliers won't fix un-updated systems in the field.

    1. Re:Simple Map Data problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Yorkshire it's always a good idea to have an Ordanance Survey map (i.e. real map). If the road you are about to drive down hasn't been coloured in, find one that has.

  33. At least by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Hey, it leads you to your target... Your wife would have led you to the nearest shoeshop...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  34. They are funny by whitehorsedigital · · Score: 1

    I was on a business trip, and we were in a rental with one of those navigation systems, and it had us turn off the main road, make a U shaped diversion and then turn back onto the main road. We just laughed. Ah technology.

  35. Someone also... by Tomy · · Score: 1

    ... needs to teach the driving directions software about ferries.

    1. Re:Someone also... by donutello · · Score: 1

      Try local.live.com. Maybe Microsoft being based in Seattle helps :)

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  36. Re:Reality TV by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 1

    I don't know . . . I had some consistantly bad experiences on the 520 when I've left work in Redmond heading for warehouse district. What you say is totally true, but I've never found it any faster. We probably travel different times of the day though, so, yeah, you know.

    And damn, mode my OP down . . . I just took an already lame joke and totally drove it into the ground explaining it. Sad.

    --
    A B A C A B B
  37. This is a...problem? by thc69 · · Score: 3, Funny

    One of the things I enjoy about my GPS is that it sometimes takes me on rocky, dangerous, fall-off-a-cliff dirt roads that I'd otherwise never find!

    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  38. Ya, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking for a slice of paradise,
    but end up at blue balls.

  39. Crackpot not a "town" by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This story was a real surprise - I never thought Crackpot would get a mention in Slashdot. My parents have a cottage just up the dale outside Gunnerside. However I feel I should point out that Crackpot is hardly a town. It consists of about two farmhouses and a barn! The biggest attraction is probably the name although I do remember going on a good walk from there once.

    Incidently the name comes from the norse "pot" meaning hole or dip (in this case referring to the limestone rift there) and "Kraka" meaning crow. As a kid I was always told it was because they found some roman coins in a cracked pot there but I think the former is more plausible!

    Anyway it was great to see Crackpot on Slashdot. I suppose next week they'll be a story about the nearby town of Hawes (which is pronounced "whores" :-)

    1. Re:Crackpot not a "town" by norfolkboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hawes... yes, I remember staying there on a fieldtrip at high school!

      Not only is Hawes pronoused Whores, but there is also a dairy there called "Hawes Creamery". http://archive.thisisthenortheast.co.uk/2001/4/27/ 172568.html

    2. Re:Crackpot not a "town" by Burb · · Score: 1

      Of course, in the USA, that's big enough to qualify as a "City".

      --

    3. Re:Crackpot not a "town" by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      ahh, Hawes, suddenly i know where we're talking about, camped at hawes a few years back, walked up some big hills and visited some pubs, good fun. but yeah, for you americans, think of what england looks like in amercian movies, tree filled villages, cows, pubs and thin roads, well this bit looks like that in real life.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  40. One more option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3) Let crack dealers open up a camp at the beginning of the road.

  41. as you sow so shall you reap by screeble · · Score: 1

    If you're not smart enough to read a map and realize you probably shouldn't go down roads with big boulders and cliffs then don't blame it on a GPS... It's 100% user error.

    I routinely use GPS waypoint tracking while I'm fishing and 4X4ing.

    I then import that data into Google Earth/KML.

    Only once have I ever ended up with a KML file I'd actually give someone to use for fishing.

    Normally, I end up with results worthy of usage for getting rid of your enemies.

    Oh sure... Just go down that goat track for fifteen clicks and then turn left at the old stump.

    Trust me, it's totally safe! The GPS knows exactly where you are!

    HA!

  42. Similar Issues by Cylix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A looong time ago in Seatle I managed to get some similar system.

    Hertz or herts or something car rental came with a navigation system.

    I thought, well this is nifty and set about setting up my destination.

    It was a bit of a pain initially and I was really annoyed I didn't have more time to spend truly learning it before I actually went somewhere. Still, I pressed onward with this great technological advancement and started on my way.

    I swear the damn thing tried to kill me repeatedly.

    Wrong street here, one way there or just it generally shouting at me that I was going the wrong way.

    I was still fairly impressed that it managed to re-calculate the route, but I gave up on it after the second time it sent me down the wrong way on a one way street.

    It ended up being useful to get me close to my destination, but just wasn't responsive enough for my needs.

    I'm sure it is much better now though.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  43. Misdirected paranoia? by ztucker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Coincidentally, 97.5% of those misdirected thought Blair was wrong on Iraq and 98.6% thought British Intelligence was incompetent.

  44. OT: rambling about Seatle rental cars by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Heh, I remember very earnestly signing the contract for a rental... a legal sized page of 1 point type (ok, maybe 6 point, max) - saying stuff like "I won't take this car out of the state..."

    As I recall, I chose that car company because it was conveniently located close to the ferry dock. Their car was on the way out of the country in 30 minutes.

    (Canada is still another country, right?)

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  45. Map by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's a map of the place. Check out those contour lines (in metres), and the chevrons on the roads, which indicate steep gradients (for those not versed in British OS map symbols).

    I guess it's that pale-white track on the bottom left, just below the "Summer Lodge [Farm]" that was mentioned in the article, in which case no GPS system should take you down one of those - white on British OS maps (as opposed to yellow) means no tarmac. And the dotted edges of the road indeed mean "unfenced". Lovely stuff. It's even debatable whether the narrow yellow roads on that map (which mean single-track with passing places) should be used by a GPS as through routes, let alone the white ones!

    Still, it reinforces the stupidity of the drivers, as there's obviously a point there, just past the farm, where the character of the road changes, and they blindly believe the GPS rather than turn back and let it find another route.

    1. Re:Map by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Check out those contour lines (in metres), and the chevrons on the roads, which indicate steep gradients

      That's the thing with the consumer GPS systems I've seen; none of them include things like contour lines. They are simply 2 dimensional road maps. Not very detailed, but I'd imagine that would be by design, to keep the display easy to read while driving.

      It's even debatable whether the narrow yellow roads on that map (which mean single-track with passing places) should be used by a GPS as through routes, let alone the white ones!

      Depends who you are marketing it to...tourists drive on these roads up here in Scotland a lot. There's a few out-of-the-way places where you have no choice.

    2. Re:Map by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      It's even debatable whether the narrow yellow roads on that map (which mean single-track with passing places) should be used by a GPS as through routes, let alone the white ones!

      Well, if it excluded single-track roads, it would be basically useless in some parts of Scotland (Westeross, but others too), which only have single track roads. Sometimes even without passing places (Applecross).

    3. Re:Map by jd678 · · Score: 2, Informative
      white on British OS maps (as opposed to yellow) means no tarmac

      A common misconception, but no, it doesn't. White means unclassified. As in not a Motorway, A road, B road, or a C/D/U depending on local authority classification scheme. There's plenty of white roads with tarmac, try the Old Military Road in north Dartmoor for one, and unless you're on a majorish road, you'll probably find the street you live on is infact white. Is it tarmaced?

    4. Re:Map by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      > > It's even debatable whether the narrow yellow roads on that map
      > > (which mean single-track with passing places) should be used by
      > > a GPS as through routes, let alone the white ones!
      >
      > Depends who you are marketing it to...tourists drive on these roads up here in
      > Scotland a lot.

      I know, I'm one of them. :-) My Dad was born in Scotland and we used to go back there most years for a holiday.

      > There's a few out-of-the-way places where you have no choice.

      Yup, but in those cases they'd be through-routes, wouldn't they? I'm just saying that it shouldn't use "thin yellow roads" unless there's no other option, in which case it obviously has to use them. "Thick yellow" ones are fine, they're often very good and useful shortcuts.

      Besides, I did say it was debatable. :-)

      The problem for the map software then of course, is if it has the choice of a "thin yellow road" that lasts 1 mile, or a circuitous route involving bigger roads that takes 40 or 50 miles, it would choose the latter. It's a difficult balancing act (a bit like the poor bastards driving up past Crackpot!).

      And of course, as a poster below points out, in towns and cities you have lots of little white roads that are just fine. I guess that these things really should have gradient and fencing information included in their databases.

    5. Re:Map by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      > Well, if it excluded single-track roads, it would be basically useless in some parts of Scotland (Westeross,
      > but others too), which only have single track roads. Sometimes even without passing places (Applecross).

      Yup. See my reply to the previous poster...but in the case of Westeross (but not Applecross, granted) they're not marked as thin yellow roads anyway, but as red-and-white-striped A-roads.

    6. Re:Map by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      > > white on British OS maps (as opposed to yellow) means no tarmac
      >
      > A common misconception, but no, it doesn't. White means unclassified.


      Yes, of course it does, my mistake. And I was about to say "I didn't mean 'white', I meant 'transparent' as in the road you can see on the map.", but checking the map legend reveals that that might not be true either. You'd think I'd know better after years of reading Landrangers, but that's what happens when you post in the wee small hours of the morning.

      And yet you and I both know that any uncoloured ;-) road with dashed edges outside a town or city generally means trouble, unless it's a driveway to a posh house or something. So OK then...white roads that aren't marked as being in built-up areas (i.e. surrounded by orangey-brown). All this just goes to show how difficult it all is. I mean, if you look at the 1:50,000 or 1:10,000 views of the place on Multimap, that track is shown as a full-blown road on both of them; yet both the OS 1:50,000 and 1:25,000 (zoom in from here) maps show the true situation very clearly.

      And yes, I do live on a white road...and yes, it's tarmaced, or "metalled" as the OS legend likes to put it. :-) Um, or used to, they don't seem to draw that distinction any more, maybe that's where I'm going wrong. Did they used to do that on the old 1" to a mile maps (showing my age there!)?

  46. take the American approach by bhalter80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe this is why most GPS in car nav systems have a click through disclaimer every time it starts saying that while these are valid directiosn they are not necessarily the best/fastest/safest way from A -> B and that you use them at your own peril.

    This is what happens when people rely too much on nifty gadgets and stop using basic skills like map reading. The map may sill take you down this road but from what I've seen people get all googlyeyed in front of any video display and lose basic reasoning skill, like that which would prompt somoene to fidgit with the GPS for a minute and find an alternate route as this one seems undrivable.

  47. Hmmm... I wonder. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    City: Silent Hill, Toluca County, West Virginia.

    Hey, what's that cliff doing in the middle of the roaaAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  48. ..... You don't even have to RTA.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to gather that the drivers didn't enter Crackpot as a destination. The navigation system directed them *through* it to get to their intended destination.

  49. Magellen Roadmate 760 by browng · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have owned a Magellen Roadmate 760 for six months. Living in Chicagoland for 28 years I find my GPS makes days out more flexible; any new place we wish to go is its command. In the past, going from one area to another would include at least a slght bit of driving towards home till we found a street we know takes us to the new area. With GPS it is almost like a wormhole, as soon after you leave your starting point you are in unfamiliar territory and then sooner than you would think you pop out at your destination. I have learned more about what this area has to offer.

    1. Re:Magellen Roadmate 760 by dghomefry · · Score: 1

      One of the things I like doing with my Magellan is setting the route to absolute shortest distance.

      I've toured through some wild areas, particularly when driving through the country. It is a great way to explore when you have the time and are tired of the same old highway route.

  50. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The couple want to see the track removed from the route recommended by satellite navigation systems for travelling between Swaledale and Wensleydale."

  51. Re:Reality TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You live in Lynnwood? And admit it? Sad.

  52. DeLorme is no better. by zenwarrior · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Someone gave me the DeLorme Earthmate GPS navigation system that wires into any laptop and offers realtime voice directions. I have used it on three trips now, each with routes I know with my eyes closed, and it has provided very wrong directions each and every time. In each case, had I relied on it, I would never--or after extended detours--have arrived at my destinations. So regarding DeLorme products, caveat emptor.

    Oh, and should someone give you it as a gift, you can translate their generosity into the words, "Go get lost!"

    --
    /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
    1. Re:DeLorme is no better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need technology to take you the wrong way. Cabbies are sometimes like that.

      Just the other night the bartender told me not to drive home, she was calling me a cab. Good bartender.

      So the cabbie starts driving south on fifth street. "Where the hell are you going?" I ask.

      "What? You think I'm trying to take you the long way for a bigger fare?"

      "Yes, I do. Now turn around, go down Ash street and you can fucking forget about a tip, asshole."

      Everybody wants to take advantage of a drunk. Sometimes to their own disadvantege.

  53. Do any of these show 3D/ortho/ perspective views? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    In Dec 2004 in Tokyo my taxi driver in picked me up after the limo bus dropped me off at some Hyatt Grand or similar (I can't remember the name anymore) and turned on his GPS system. I was blown away.

    This think had 3D/elevation-like views. As he got closer to my destination (a hostel only about 10 minutes walk from the big hotel where the limo bus deposited me), he couldn't find the little alleyway between two narrow but longer streets. He went round and round like 4 or 5 times trying to nail the address. I didn't care. Why?

    Well, as we travelled the main streets and turned here and there, his GPS system showed the (I think Tokyo Tower and some other) tall buildings. As we ambled round and up and round the block, these building's orientations changed and the 3-D wireframe gave us the feel of being a slow-moving bird going between mountain peaks (of structures). To me that just absolutely blows the doors off ANYthing I've seen US companies bragging about and the stuff selling for $800 that often is a database of sites and just red and blue lines on a yellow page.

    Has anyone else seen in the US anything like the 3-D navigation in Japan? Of course, maybe they need it MORE over there with the buildings and addresses being as dense as they are. But, in SF, NYC and other similar places, I could see it being useful here, too.

    In the end, it turned out that he'd been passing the hostel each time. We went RIGHT by the door. The building had only been there 2 years, but the street was there longer than that.

    But, for other GPS uses, check this out:

    http://gpss.tripoduk.com/asilinks.htm

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  54. It's only the drivers that get people killed by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    GPS nav is just a part of the instrumentation. You still need to be a responsible driver to use one.

    As a driver you should never drive where (s)he can't see or at speeds that are uncontrollable. What if there's backed up traffic/accident? What if the road has been washed away or a kid is playing in the road?

    Anyone killed by a GPS nav giving them guidance over a cliff deserves what they get. This is Darwinian selection at work (or if you believe God speaks to you via GPS, then it is ID).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  55. dalsdjk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    foo bar baz!

  56. It's a fair cop by abb3w · · Score: 1
    ...put up a sign "Toll Road Ahead".

    A 100 foot drop-off will definitely take a toll on your car if you go over.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  57. 404: Subject not found... by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

    You know, left is good too...

  58. GPS + Aus = Oops. by BloodAngel_Au · · Score: 1

    Oh, thats nothing... In Autralia, when your inland more than 100Kms, most GPS systems don't show whole towns or roads! not to mention the old 'take this road for 200Kms then this road for 50Kms' when a different road would get you there with almost 100Kms less.. :)

    And cliffs & mountains are optional

  59. +4 Funny, but Insightful?! by Maow · · Score: 1
    Re:Wow (Score:2, Insightful) Only on Slashdot...

    It gets worse -- it is now up to:

    Re:Wow (Score:4, Insightful)

    +4 Funny, but Insightful?!

    1. Re:+4 Funny, but Insightful?! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      inquistive perhaps, but insightful? Hmmm... I'm pretty sure I'd at least think twice if it was running Windows.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  60. Re:Do any of these show 3D/ortho/ perspective view by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    TomTom shows a short-of 3d view. It's basically the flat map viewed at an angle. It's like having a chase 'copter! No building details, but that might be a good thing, less concentration deciphering the GPS display and more for driving. This style not only looks neat, it actually makes it easy to understand.

    It still sends you the wrong places though. Once I was running late for something, so I decided to just trust it. In that one 5 mile journey it tried to send me down a one-way street the wrong way as well as two roads that had been permamently closed to through-traffic. The maps are at least five years out of date.

  61. Re:Do any of these show 3D/ortho/ perspective view by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    10 minutes walk... He went round and round like 4 or 5 times trying to nail the address. I didn't care. Why?

    And the taxi driver didn't care either. Never earned a fare that easily...

    I hope for you that this was on company expense, not out of your pockets ;-)

    In the end, it turned out that he'd been passing the hostel each time.

    Hehe. Now I know what I'll do when my employers fires me. I'll move to Tokyo and be a taxi driver, bedazzling the naive tourists and business travelers with my snazzy GPS... ;-)

  62. Re:Reality TV by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They don't think for themselves any more, they never question the almighty computer.

    And you think this is somehow a new thing? People rarely question authority figures. Witness the Milgram Experiment which found that 65% of people will inflict fatal electric shocks as punishment when told to do so by an authority figure. That's right, 65% of us are Lyndie England wannabes, given the right circumstances. People are very malleable and easy to lead.

    Computers take this to a new level of (misguided) trust.

  63. common sense by MrSpiff · · Score: 1

    satellite navigation is obviously just an aid in both cars and boats. there's been a lot more accidents at sea because people trust their GPS navigation blindly, not realizing the maps are still as old as the 19th century in some places (atleast in swedish waters) and believing that the accurancy is way better than with good old fashioned navigation techniques.

  64. What kind of dumb driver... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    ...blindly follows everything his/her satnav says?? Surely one of
    these dumbf*cks must've noticed that there were on a boulder strewn
    cliff road and just perhaps a lonely braincell might've fired up briefly and
    thought "hey , this can't be right can it?". I mean really , if the thing
    had directed them off the cliff would they have just obeyed? I'm wondering
    whose more of a robot , the satnav or the driver.

    1. Re:What kind of dumb driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're kinda like those people who hit the enter key before they reach the right hand side of the textarea for fear of falling off the edge of the page...

  65. Let nature take its course by mrogers · · Score: 0

    I smell a Darwin Award...

  66. Thanks; by Crizp · · Score: 1

    you saved me the bother of saying it. All GPS units have warnings about exactly this too, in the style of "This is not a replacement for watching the road, dumbass".

  67. Automotive Darwinism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say let the imbeciles (PHBs, Salesdroids, White Van Men) get stuck and/or fall off the cliff. The gene pool needs less of such potential donors.

  68. Re:Reality TV by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0, Troll
    People seem to have this strange idea that computers are infallible and anything that a computer tells them is always going to magically be 100% accurate.

    Somebody should tell them about Microsoft. Then they would quickly stop believing that computers are 100% right. Maybe, this satnav is actually running WinCE, who knows?

  69. Sensationalism by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    The thing that these news stories seem to ignore is that, on every satnav I have ever used, if you take a different route than it specifies, the system automatically recalculates a new route to your destination, and updates its directions accordingly. A driver could easily turn around once they realized that the satnav was leading them on an unpaved road, and wouldn't even be inconvenienced by having to manually reprogram their route.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  70. Offer the sales reps a cheap upgrade by LeRandy · · Score: 1

    You too can enhance your driving experience, while really learning about route-planning.

    The best upgrade to your sat-nav that you'll ever buy

    for only £3.99, we offer you a comprehensive, up-to-date route planning system, where your roads are colour-coded so you can tell whether they are suitable.

    And with no need for batteries, further updates, or complicated technologies, the ROAD-ATLAS (TM) will do the job in a fully portable, paper-based unit.

  71. Microshit astroturfers with mod points? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (n/t)

  72. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Darwin Awards.

  73. WEBCAM!! by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Somebody please put a webcam on the most dangerous part of this road and put it online. You will get tons of hits and provide a good source of entertainment for the web masses.

    --
    Meh.
  74. It's not just the crackpots with GPS by quoob · · Score: 1

    You don't need a GPS to end up on the road to Crackpot. My wife and I were once led to that road by a low-tech AA atlas. Of course, we really went that way because we couldn't resist seeing a place called "Crackpot", but the map's rendering of that nasty road didn't make it appear any worse than others we'd happily navigated while exploring other Yorkshire backcountry. By the way, once you start down that road, turning around is not an option.

  75. GPS != IFR by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    Just because your GPS says there's a passable road in front of you doesn't mean you should trust it instead of your own eyes. I use a GPS on my motorcycle and sometimes the unit neglects to mention that it's routing me onto a gravel road. Watching events unfold on the screen instead of in front of me has had nearly-tragic results on at least one occasion.

    In Alaska, my unit's map was off by 200 feet in some places. It knew where I was, just not where the road was -- It looked like I was going 60 MPH through the woods or water on either side of the road.

    The moral of the story is that GPS is a navigational aid, and not a substitute for actual navigation skills. There's more than one sailor who's lost his boat because his GPS told him he was far away from the rocks; it comes as no surprise there are drivers losing their cars for the same reasons.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  76. old road by fltchr · · Score: 1

    Me and some friends from college had reunion in upstate new york. Anyone who used directions from mapquest or googlemaps (rather than from the host) ended up at a fence on the edge of a field. According to mapquest and google the road continued on to the house on the other side of the field. The friend whose house we were going to said that there used to be a road there, but that it had gone out of use long ago. Is this a case of a no longer existing road still being on the county records (or wherever they are kept)? Is this something that happens on occasion when using these technologies?

  77. Sounds like natural selection to me by Myrrh · · Score: 1

    This is a good way of weeding out the stupid people who will blindly do what their satellite navigation system tells them to do.

    It's a shame the vehicles have to suffer, though.

    Brings to mind a Simpsons episode: "There. We're here. Now let us never speak of the shortcut again."

  78. Remember to look out the window by davet2 · · Score: 1

    I'm living in Denmark, and last summer we went out to a farm - being a farm, it's of course in the middle of nowhere. So I followed the GPS which sent me down worse and worse roads (grass as tall as the car at one point!) until we got to the farm only to be told that there is a main road not 100m from the track I was sent down.

    Then the farm owner told me that the previous winter he had an insurance guy come out to him, again following his GPS, except he was following it a little too closely and ended up driving into a huge pile of snow the farmer had just moved off this little track so he could get out! He had to walk to the farm and get the farmer to pull his car out ;-)

    Maybe people should take a good look out of the window when driving - that way they might not end up down the side of a hill or in a huge snowdrift!

  79. Been there by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    My GPS put me down the wrong way on a one-way road once. Screech, into the parking lot to turn around. But I needed the wake-up call to not trust the damned thing implicitly. I love it when it disagrees with me and says, "Make U-turn immediately, if possible." Mine has a vaguely Asian female voice. I call her "Suni" and she's my girlfriend. We have a dialogue in the car. My wife doesn't like it.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that those navigation systems often have female voices... normally you would not want a female as a navigator :-)

  80. Automatic Mapmaking by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    The "problem" would seem to be insufficient vetting for automated cartographic methods. AFAIK, modern road maps are made from a combination of radar, ultraviolet, and various other spectrum images. Aparantly the bare roads stand right out when you use the right filters.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  81. Exactly, I can imagine the story when you get home by grgyle · · Score: 1

    Honey, I couldn't believe that the GPS took me down that sharp ravine filled with low branches and sharp rocks. Lucky for me there was a tire and body paint shop at the end of the road with a special sale going on!

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  82. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were watching the road instead of their GPS screen, they wouldn't have to worry about it!

  83. Re:Do any of these show 3D/ortho/ perspective view by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Actually, if I remember correctly/correct, the fare was under Y900, or about $8.50 or $9.10 that night. It would have been more if the confusion weren't his fault. They have TONS of taxi drivers and cabs, and this poor guy must've been there for the first time. The horrible congestion at certain times of the day or night is the killer on the fare. Going round the block was fast since it was a small block.

    But, yeh, IF you can learn the language, get a license, and fit in, you just might be able to become a taxi driver there. Sure it'll be MUCH tougher than say an expat/foreigner moving to the US or the UK or similar places (I assuming I'm leaping a bit in this statement/sentence...)

    But, true, too, being dazzled by the GPS (which I forgot to mention, I think did have up and down road elevation, not just the bird's-eye-view). And, being dazzled more than made up for the fare, or any extra I might have paid.

    But, you have to consider this: Japan is not NEARLY as domestically concerned about external terrorism as is the US. All major countries invite the wrath of SOMEbody out there, but to date, since the subway gassing in Tokyo (I think I went through that station a couple times, and in most of them they removed ALL the trash cans, but you CAN buy food; you dispose of your coffee cup in a special cup receiver that I think gives you back 5 yen for not littering), but in the US, anything with kick-ass resolution is banned to the normal public.

    Makes me wonder...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  84. Re:Do any of these show 3D/ortho/ perspective view by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

    I've got the TomTom Go 300 and a sample of its 3D view is available here and in night mode here- sure it doesn't include wireframe buildings like the one you saw (which would be cool) but for £300 ($500) I can't complain. The GPS device you saw also probably only have buildings for Tokyo only - anything outside Tokyo wouldn't have it probably.