Realistically one of two things will happen. One: The trial will be over quickly as the CC companies find a way to short circuit the case, with an early dismissal or something similar. Chances: 60%. Two: The trial will take forever because the CC companies will drag it out, and Wikileaks will run out of money (since they control their primary source of donations) and settle. Chances: 39.9%.
You look around. To your NORTH, you see a LARGE WALL OF CAPITALIZED TEXT. You figure that someone got OVEREXCITED in their Slashdot post, and didn't stop to think that it MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE A SPAZ.
What do you do?
> set fire to text
Luckily the text is made of wood, and burns HOTTER THAN THE GRITS ON NATALIE PORTMAN.
If the author still claims his software is original, he should release the source code to the panel under an NDA strictly for the purposes of evaluation.
I really feel for your situation. That said, I'm still going to trust people. I trust people knowing that that trust could blow up in my face at any time; that's just a risk one takes. I will continue to trust people because without trust, there is only suspicion and paranoia, and I don't really want to live in a world where paranoia rules anyway.
Some. Go on, try it. Some Christians. There are literally thousands of sects of Christianity, all believing something slightly different. Painting them all with the brush of, say, the Westboro "Baptists" is a huge, sweeping, unfounded generalization.
If "the Old Testament, as it stands, is now a history book that we can learn from, not a body of law that we are to strictly follow" then why do people keep quoting it while claiming that we are violating God's laws?
Because extremists will use any form of failed logic to prop up their viewpoints.
If the Old Testament is not binding law, then why is it quoted to say that homosexuality is wrong? Why is it quoted to say same-sex marriage is an abomination? Why is it quoted to say that sex before marriage is wrong? The Ten Commandments? etc. It would see that you are still "picking and choosing" bits and pieces that you want to follow because you agree with them, and then throwing away the bits and pieces you don't agree with.
I'm pretty sure the idea is that Jesus and the apostles set out new laws that overrode the old ones (though I'm 99.999% sure that the Ten Commandments still apply). If you believe it's entirely fiction (which, let's be honest, it looks like you do), than the "picking and choosing" bit makes sense, but if you at least believe in some truth value in the New Testament, the explanation is in there.
Either the bible is a body of laws to follow in which you must follow it all, or the bible is not a body of laws to follow in which don't follow the laws in it. You can't claim that it's just a history book and not a body of law....except for the parts that we want to still be laws...
Huh, crazy. You learn something new every day. I assume this is specific to Gnome but I could be wrong. In any case, this message was entered with no mouse interaction at all from Ubuntu 11.04.
That would work, especially since an ISP could do a man-in-the-middle attack on SSL pretty easily; it would just require more resources since they'd have to be looking for the connection and handshake and recording the keys passed, then decrypting the stream on the fly. I think if they disallowed any encryption other than SSL, most people wouldn't complain because they'd still be able to access their website and email.
If you think the RIAA will actually take on any part of the cost of this, you're insane. They're run by lawyers; the agreement will allow them to slip out of any required contribution.
Slashdot Mirror
Game company using this technology to restrict any access to the game whatsoever to the first buyer in 3... 2...
We're going to need to give you a cavity search.
*straps passenger to table, puts on gloves, grabs scalpel*
A deep cavity search.
"Don't be evil" died with the IPO. Don't kid yourself.
People in the know, who don't want to be sued, have already replaced it (albeit with an older technology).
Realistically one of two things will happen. One: The trial will be over quickly as the CC companies find a way to short circuit the case, with an early dismissal or something similar. Chances: 60%. Two: The trial will take forever because the CC companies will drag it out, and Wikileaks will run out of money (since they control their primary source of donations) and settle. Chances: 39.9%.
My thoughts exactly. Why would I want Unity?
The CC companies' lawyers will crush Wikileaks into the ground, with 99% certainty. They're just not big enough to get justice here.
Prove it. A terrorist could simply switch to someone with a more favorable race, and thus gain the advantage of the "wave-through".
I assume a company like RIM is smart enough to put non-competes in their employment contracts. Then again, I did just read that letter...
You look around. To your NORTH, you see a LARGE WALL OF CAPITALIZED TEXT. You figure that someone got OVEREXCITED in their Slashdot post, and didn't stop to think that it MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE A SPAZ.
What do you do?
> set fire to text
Luckily the text is made of wood, and burns HOTTER THAN THE GRITS ON NATALIE PORTMAN.
If the author still claims his software is original, he should release the source code to the panel under an NDA strictly for the purposes of evaluation.
Plus, to encrypt client-side, you'd have to give away your salt.
I really feel for your situation. That said, I'm still going to trust people. I trust people knowing that that trust could blow up in my face at any time; that's just a risk one takes. I will continue to trust people because without trust, there is only suspicion and paranoia, and I don't really want to live in a world where paranoia rules anyway.
Google could decide to move their Mozilla money to the Chrome team right now (and frankly, I'm shocked that they haven't already).
Some. Go on, try it. Some Christians. There are literally thousands of sects of Christianity, all believing something slightly different. Painting them all with the brush of, say, the Westboro "Baptists" is a huge, sweeping, unfounded generalization.
Because extremists will use any form of failed logic to prop up their viewpoints.
I'm pretty sure the idea is that Jesus and the apostles set out new laws that overrode the old ones (though I'm 99.999% sure that the Ten Commandments still apply). If you believe it's entirely fiction (which, let's be honest, it looks like you do), than the "picking and choosing" bit makes sense, but if you at least believe in some truth value in the New Testament, the explanation is in there.
Who's the fundamentalist now?
Huh, crazy. You learn something new every day. I assume this is specific to Gnome but I could be wrong. In any case, this message was entered with no mouse interaction at all from Ubuntu 11.04.
(BTW, plus seems to be "click".)
It's (usually) solved by being completely ignored. Cruise control has no driver monitoring feature; it just stays on until you turn it off or break.
That would work, especially since an ISP could do a man-in-the-middle attack on SSL pretty easily; it would just require more resources since they'd have to be looking for the connection and handshake and recording the keys passed, then decrypting the stream on the fly. I think if they disallowed any encryption other than SSL, most people wouldn't complain because they'd still be able to access their website and email.
It's cool to make fun of PHP here. *shrugs* It's making me a fair bit of money to ignore them. ;^)
Cool. Sorry about that. Being from Canada, I know exactly how annoying GeoIP blocking can be.
Hint: The next step is outlawing encryption on home connections.
Your ToS allows the company to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants. Guaranteed.
If you think the RIAA will actually take on any part of the cost of this, you're insane. They're run by lawyers; the agreement will allow them to slip out of any required contribution.
Also, that standard should license proprietary designs from a single company with money I conjure from thin air.