Slashdot Mirror


There Oughta Be a Standard: Laptop Power Supplies

Esther Schindler writes "Every mobile device you own has its own power supply and its own proprietary plug. There oughta be a better way, says Alfred Poor. Fortunately, he reports, the IEEE is coming to the rescue. "Their Universal Power Adapter for Mobile Devices (UPAMD) Working Group is developing a new standard that will not just address the needs of laptops and tablets, but will be intended to work with just about any electronics device that required between 10 and 240 watts of power," Poor writes. It's about darned time." If there's one thing I wish for all laptop power supplies, it's that they would license from Apple (or work around, patent-wise) the magnet attachment system that makes cable-tripping far less dangerous to man or beast, compared to a few years ago.

482 comments

  1. cost by frozentier · · Score: 2

    Just hope it doesn't end up costing more than a proprietary power supply, especially since you'll most likely only be able to use it with one device at a time.

    1. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It should be cheaper. It opens the door for manufacturers to provide a laptop without a power supply, and opens a 3rd party market for separate power bricks at competitive prices.

    2. Re:cost by SirGeek · · Score: 1

      What about making induction powering standard instead ?

    3. Re:cost by Kenja · · Score: 2

      Why would a power supply supporting up to 240 watts even though your device only needs 10 cost more? Oh wait...

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:cost by odin84gk · · Score: 0

      You forgot all of the extra safety equipment that must be included to compensate for the full wattage range. That will increase the cost.

    5. Re:cost by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Assuming they don't do something stupid with the power negotiation communication implementation and make it require some stupid patent licenses or similar...

    6. Re:cost by c · · Score: 2

      and opens a 3rd party market for separate power bricks at competitive prices.

      ... and gives Monster Cable yet another exorbitant gold plated widget that electronics sales drones can push on baffled consumers.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 1

      What extra safety equipment ? Higher wattage needs some beefier components, but the price difference is minimal. Safety is mostly determined by providing enough insulation to the mains voltage, which doesn't depend on the wattage.

    8. Re:cost by dwillden · · Score: 1

      No this would be more akin to cell phone chargers for cars. You can pay $50 bucks for the official charger at the phone store, or you can go to Target and pay $19.99 each for one or more that matches your phone model. Except now instead of the store having to stock 15 or 20 different chargers, they can offer a couple different ones from different manufacturers. Perhaps with different features. This one has a couple USB sockets to allow for direct charging of gadgets without the computer trying to access them.

      You are already seeing this convenience in cell phones and similar sized electronics. My cell and my nook use the same micro USB plug, so my car charger will charge both, and the wall warts and USB data cords for both are fully interchangeable. Also my car charger has a standard USB socket on the back so I bring out one of the other cables and I can charge both. And I bought one more Micro USB cord for use at work to charge the devices there if needed.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    9. Re:cost by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So make every laptop more expensive and make them lose tons of power when you charge it? Sounds like a great solution.

    10. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think why this has not happened yet? They don't want the competition. The cellphone company refused for 20 years to do it, and only did it after they where FORCED by the EU an China. So wait for a law, this is never, ever going to happen without one...

    11. Re:cost by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I have heard of this standard and it requires a processor in the power supply and a substantial digital interface in the device it is powering. They handshake where the device says what kind of current and voltage is required and the power supply then responds with what is actually available. The device then must determine if that is suitable or not and if so tells the power supply to then supply power.

      It is a hugely complicated mechanism that is open to all sorts of failures, any of which result in no power to the device. It adds some custom chips to both the power supply and powered device which have to be powered somehow before the full power capability is turned on. That means there really needs to be two power supplies, one for the initial handshake and one for the main power.

      It does not mean that every power supply will work with every device, it just insures that when an incompatible power supply is connected that neither the device nor the power supply is damaged. It does absolutely open the door to a universal power connector with more than two connections. I'd expect there would have to be at least four (power, ground, data in, data out) but it could be even more than that. Of course these new multipin connectors are going to be fragile on both the supply and the device, leading to yet another point of failure.

      I understand that some people might be frustrated with having custom connectors to ensure the wrong power supply isn't connected but what this does is mandate a standard connector and incompatible power supplies which is hardly the solution.

    12. Re:cost by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Gold plated Monster power cables with LiquidMetal magnetic attachment point. I expect nothing less from Apple. It is rumored that iPhone 5 will have this.

    13. Re:cost by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      It should be cheaper. It opens the door for manufacturers to provide a laptop without a power supply, and opens a 3rd party market for separate power bricks at competitive prices.

      You think it would be better for companies to ship laptops without power supplies ? Are you the bastard responsible for deciding not to put an usb cable in the box with the printer ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    14. Re:cost by retroworks · · Score: 1

      Since it is often the exact same contract manufacturer (Wistron, Foxconn, etc.) making different power supplies for different customers in different parts of the factory during different shifts, they would save on the hundreds of thousands of surplus units they must keep on hand. There is no "Apple factory" making the "Apple Power Cords", they are all made in Shenzhen. Practically everything today is made by a "third party" to begin with.

      --
      Gently reply
    15. Re:cost by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      I appreciate that you're trying to show how the free market is flawed and central planning is the way to go, but no one was "forced".

      The GSMA trade association announced at its 2009 Mobile World Congress here that it has brokered a deal with the world's leading handset makers to come up with a standard for charging cell phones.

      All the major handset makers, including, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson, have agreed to use the Micro-USB technology as the common universal charging interface, Rob Conway, GSMA CEO, said during the opening keynote speech Tuesday. By 2012, the GSMA promises, most cell phones will use the same kind of connector to charge their batteries.

      Seventeen mobile operators, including Vodafone, Orange, and Telofonic, announced they are committed to implementing the standard for the universal mobile phone charger.

      The GSMA said that going to this single standard will not only make life easier for the more than 3 billion mobile phone users in the world today, but it will also help the environment.

      Source: CNet.

    16. Re:cost by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that you would be able to use the power supply from your previous laptop.

    17. Re:cost by tepples · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that you would be able to use the power supply from your previous laptop.

      And how much would the power supply cost for one's first laptop? Would a family resort to taking turns with one power supply?

    18. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 0

      If the laptop can be $20 cheaper without a power supply, while I still have 3 functional bricks at home from previous laptops ? Sure.

    19. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you really try, you can come up with a botched standard, and maybe that's what they're doing. On the other hand, it could simply avoid all the problems you mention.

      USB also has 4 pins, and I wouldn't call it fragile on both ends. In fact, I cannot remember a single time where the USB connector was the problem.

      Most power supplies already have a digital controller inside, so the incremental cost to add some extra logic for the protocol is negligible.

    20. Re:cost by metrometro · · Score: 1

      The standard will cover that range. It doesn't mean the power adapter has to. I could be pretty happy with small / medium / large being the only three choices in the world.

      I recently tried to replace a lost power brick for the popular EEE 10 inch netbook while on the road. $70. It can't get much worse than that.

    21. Re:cost by lgw · · Score: 1

      WTF are you going on about? Standardize the voltage (just about everything is 12V already), and use a fuse to protect against over-amping, or pick 3 amperage ratings and 3 sizes of connectors. The power is nearly standardized today, it's mostly a question of connector shape.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 1

      If you don't have enough power supplies, you can buy an extra one. Once there is a standard, generic power supplies should be cheap enough that laptop + power supply will cost you about the same as they do now with the vendor including a proprietary one.

    23. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      And this "standard" connector will suffer from the same problem it already does today: does the device look for a "charging device" or just power on the power pins?

      Example: some Sony phones use the micro-USB connector to charge. (I don't know which models, I just know that there are "Sony chargers" that have this connector.) The Sony eReader uses the same connector.

      The Sony phones apparently don't care if they are connected to a computer, they'll take power from the connector. The eReader DEMANDS that the USB host negotiate power requirements or it will happily discharge itself waiting to talk to the USB host. OR you put the appropriate shorts/loads on the data lines that tell it to charge anyway.

      I got a pair of Sony "chargers" for Christmas so I could charge my eReader while travelling without a computer. No joy. "I'll just open up the charger and short the data lines to confuse the reader into charging" I thought. Also no joy. The Sony charger manufacturer saved money on the cable and used a two-wire cable. No data lines at all.

      A better solution to the problem is to define a standard voltage that devices will accept for charging/operation. That's all. "Put 19V on the DC input, you get charging." For low power devices, "put 5.2V (USB) on the USB power lines".

      Whatever provides the voltage is responsible for limiting the current to what it can provide. End of problem. But this "send a voltage request and ack and nak and then toggle this data line to 43 ohms and then draw 3 mA on the other data line and then look for a ..." is just crap. Devices with a micro/mini/regular USB connector charge when 5V is applied. Devices with a standard XYZ connector take 19V. (Better would be 12V, but one standard at 19V is better than no standard at all).

    24. Re:cost by trum4n · · Score: 1

      Make all laptops accept 12-30 volts AC or DC. REALLY EASY. Internally, you need 12, 5,and 3.3 volts. Well, the 78xx chips do that for cheap. AC? 4x 20 cent diodes and it's DC. Now plug it into your car, 12-16 volts unregulated. Plug it into a laptop supply from another laptop, call it 19v, regulated. Military systems? 24v, unregulated. This laptop can take that all, without issue. All you need is a standard hi-current connector, that doesn't suck like a barrel plug.Put a big Zener on the input to protect it from people who can't read. As far as negotiation, it's a waste of time and money. Just build it right in the first place, and let the laptop regulate the input. The cost is so low its ridiculous.

    25. Re:cost by msauve · · Score: 1

      "just about everything is 12V already"

      No. The three laptops I have easy access to (Dell, HP/Compaq, and Lenovo) all use 19-20 VDC power supplies.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    26. Re:cost by tepples · · Score: 1

      More likely, the vendor will just pocket the wholesale cost of the not-included power supply as earnings.

    27. Re:cost by caerwyn · · Score: 2

      The beginning of action in the EU to mandate a specific charger is what caused the mobile phone manufactures to agree on such a standard- they decided it would be in their interest to pick one they liked rather than having one forced upon them.

      --
      The ringing of the division bell has begun... -PF
    28. Re:cost by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ah, yep, should ahve checked before I posted, then then this wouldn't be /. Still, picking the voltage most laptops use seems a safe bet here.

      Reading on down the comments, it seems they are planning some crazy computerized approach. This will end in tears.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    29. Re:cost by Arlet · · Score: 2

      Not likely, for the same reason the vendor doesn't just add $20 to the price of the original laptop: I'll just buy a competing brand.

    30. Re:cost by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      More along the lines of, "I'm talking about the 686 prototypes, with the artificial intelligence RISC chip."

    31. Re:cost by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Easy solution, don't buy from that vendor. If they don't give you a product at a price you're willing to pay then don't buy it. If it's still worth it even with the few extra dollars that they "pocket" then buy it anyway. You're profiting buy getting something you wanted. The profit is mutual. Until there is a gun involved it is a voluntary exchange for mutual befit.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    32. Re:cost by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      How can one high wattage PSU possibly be more expensive than a dozen lower-wattage PSUs?

      --
      No sig today...
    33. Re:cost by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You obviously know nothing about modern electronics. 78xx chips are linear regulators, and no one uses those any more because they're so inefficient. Every small electronic device now uses switching power supplies, not only to save power but to reduce heat, which is important for something sitting in your lap. The idea of a laptop computer using linear supplies is utterly laughable.

    34. Re:cost by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't very efficient?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    35. Re:cost by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      And how much would the power supply cost for one's first laptop?

      How they hell would I know? Whatever the vendor wants to charge.

      Would a family resort to taking turns with one power supply?

      Previous laptop, as in being replaced due to age or problems. If you are buying a second laptop, then you would need a second power supply.

    36. Re:cost by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      those baffled consumers subsidies loss leaders for the rest of us. we should all thank them for their kindly sacrifice.

    37. Re:cost by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      All the major handset makers, including, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, and Sony Ericsson, have agreed to use the Micro-USB technology as the common universal charging interface

      "All" the big handset makers?

      There is one very important name missing from this list of makers of handheld cellular phones. Anyone care to guess that name? Here's a hint: It rhymes with "Apple". They make the "only phone that matters". And in regard to the notion of a standard connector, something consumers have wanted for years, their answer is "Fuck you! You will use the connector we have created or you will not have the right to stand with those of us who are cool! This is part of our ongoing deep dedication to a refined end user experience."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    38. Re:cost by Sleepy · · Score: 1

      Have you priced car or home charger for any USB-based device lately? Standardization does wonders for economies of scale.

      If you don't care about price, most people care about clean drinking water and less wasted landfill space (even if you have to guilt them into it).

      Why would I care that I can only charge one device... I don't think this is a valid question.
      When I send back my phone to be recycled, I won't be sending back the chargers. Don't need to... they're standard, and useful.
      You either accumulate a spare, or you can buy one off ebay cheap.

      There's a bit more power variance with laptops (9v, 12v, 19v etc), but not a huge issue. A quality power supply is regulated, and could be selectable.

      A lot of generic electronics and "stuff" is sold without a power supply. If you know how to read power supplies, and understand the types (transformer vs regulated/switching) you can often save those power supplies from the trash and recycle. So I have a battery powered Coleman air matress pump which requires 6v (uses 4 'D' batteries). Wire in a DC plug to those leads, remove the batteries, and plug in a (recycled) 6V DC power supply, and there ya go... it works indoors now without wasting batteries. No need to buy an AC-powered air pump.

      We can't keep making stuff which is designed NOT to last. It is not sustainable.

    39. Re:cost by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Factual failure. They were not just forced, they literally had EU holding a knife at their throats. EU's statement was extremely clear and open text: Make one charger that fits all, or we'll mandate one with the law. Law that you will not be invited to discuss.

      This came after industry ignored EU's requests for this feature for a couple of years. Heck, if there's one thing EU actually got good at, and definitely worth the taxes we're paying is the fact that they're actually big enough to step on multinationals like they're but small bugs.

      Other similar cases include roaming charges across EU.

    40. Re:cost by wavedeform · · Score: 1

      Internally, you need 12, 5,and 3.3 volts. Well, the 78xx chips do that for cheap. .

      Something like the 78xx / 79xx regulators are very inefficient, and can give off lots of heat. There's a reason that the power section in any modern laptop is a fairly sophisticated switcher / dc-dc convertor.

    41. Re:cost by denobug · · Score: 1

      Whatever provides the voltage is responsible for limiting the current to what it can provide. End of problem. But this "send a voltage request and ack and nak and then toggle this data line to 43 ohms and then draw 3 mA on the other data line and then look for a ..." is just crap. Devices with a micro/mini/regular USB connector charge when 5V is applied. Devices with a standard XYZ connector take 19V. (Better would be 12V, but one standard at 19V is better than no standard at all).

      I agree with your suggestion. One thing I need more information, however. The standard industrial DC application uses 24VDC, where is the consumer electronic's 19VDC came from?

    42. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Monster Cable, Best Buy and the rest of them all buy those cables at $3-$15 a pop and have an insane markup. I think if there is a standard, the price of laptops will rise slightly to make up for the loss in exclusiveness. I tend to use old power supplies or find one that fit. As long as there's enough juice to power the laptop it doesn't make a difference, that's one of the things I learned over the years and I haven't ever had a power supply fault except on my first PC, but that's because I was learning on how to clean those bad boys.

      Laptops is not a concern to me, what is a concern is phone and tablet chargers all being different. I don't mind if they use micro-usb, so long as they all use micro-usb for phones. If they need more power then use something bigger and flat.

    43. Re:cost by profplump · · Score: 2

      I agree that it's not important to have closely regulated voltage at the input. And most devices already don't care much.

      But negotiation is important because lets power-consuming devices make decisions about what they do with the available power, should less than 240W be available, and allows power supplies to be built to this standard even if they cannot output a full 240W.

      For example, if my laptop drew 240W while running and charging the battery, I'd need ~20A from my car to power it. But my car might only have a 15A outlet. Without negotiation the laptop cannot be plugged into the car at all, as it will blow the fuse. With negotiation the laptop can plug in and make a decision about whether or not there's enough power to do anything useful. It might, for instance, power the CPU but not charge the battery, or put the battery in a trickle-charge that takes longer but draws less power.

    44. Re:cost by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      Laptops tend to require voltages nearing 20 VDC. I know the ~20 V rail in the laptops I've owned were all used for the display, inverted and stepped up for the CCFL LCD (or keyboard) backlight. I've never futzed around with any LED-backlit laptops so I'm not sure if that's still true. In my experience, manufacturers *tend* to keep power supplies relatively standard across their products. Any Apple laptop made after 2006 can accept any power adapter they made at that point, though the MacBook Pros come with higher wattage supplies than the MacBooks and probably wouldn't charge well on the MacBook or MacBook Air adapter.

    45. Re:cost by Duradin · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*
      Bravo, sir, bravo. That's a shellacking the fanboys won't soon forget.

    46. Re:cost by Duradin · · Score: 1

      You'd really put a power supply from a laptop that was having problems into a new one?

    47. Re:cost by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

      Plus there would be the constant moist popping sounds as peoples' heads in Sebastopol* exploded from caaaaaaaaaancer.

      * California

      --
      Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    48. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      With negotiation the laptop can plug in and make a decision about whether or not there's enough power to do anything useful.

      Nonsense. You don't need negotiation to determine this. Just watch the input VOLTAGE. If the voltage starts to drop as you pull more current, then the supply is limited and you need to do something about it. That takes NO intelligence in the supply other than the natural current limiting.

      All that this negotiation adds is the requirement that you buy someone's smart charger instead of using the power you already have available. You can't hook your 20A 12V power supply up to your laptop to charge it because your laptop will be trying to negotiate with the supply. My 30A supply would power your laptop all day, except the laptop will shut itself off when it can't negotiate with my power supply. Nor would my bank of backup batteries be able to run that laptop, for the same reason. No, I would be forced to buy someone's smart charger and probably do a wasteful conversion of my 12V into 120AC just so I can plug the smart charger in somewhere.

      Having your laptop decide what not to do based on the power supply it is plugged into is a different problem than finding out that the cellphone you just bought won't use any of the chargers you already own because it wants 6V and your chargers only do 5V, and it has a microUSB connector and your chargers are all mini-USB. And then finding out that the ebook you just bought, even though it claims to charge through the USB connector, won't charge unless it is connected directly to a host (a hub isn't good enough).

      The latter problem doesn't need smarts, it only needs a standard voltage and connector. If I want to home-brew a charger for my phone based on the bank of solar-charged batteries I have, all I should have to do is get one of the right connectors and produce the right voltage. I shouldn't have to program some computer chip with the right protocols to negotiate what can be mandated by fiat.

      Solving this problem with the same solution that you want for your laptop is vast overkill and will cost everyone else a lot of money they shouldn't have to spend.

    49. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      One thing I need more information, however. The standard industrial DC application uses 24VDC, where is the consumer electronic's 19VDC came from?

      I assumed that the now common laptop 19V supply was based on the batteries being used. A voltage high enough that it doesn't need to be boosted to charge the batteries. From that, you can tack on all the other DC/DC converters pretty easily for lower voltages.

      Although, someone else has posted that this voltage is based on the voltage for the backlight of the LCD display. I don't know. I don't believe it, since the backlight voltage has to be generated from the battery voltage when portable. If you have to have a circuit to produce that voltage anyway, then you save nothing. You only save if you make the incoming voltage optimized for the battery you have. Charging the battery is about the only thing you do while on shore power that doesn't happen when portable.

    50. Re:cost by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You don't need negotiation to determine this. Just watch the input VOLTAGE. If the voltage starts to drop as you pull more current, then the supply is limited and you need to do something about it. That takes NO intelligence in the supply other than the natural current limiting.

      In the example given above, what if the power supply is overspecced, but is on a 12V 10A fuse (as most/all car cigarette lighters are).

      A properly specified power supply will never drop voltage to a point of current insufficiency in its usable range, but other pieces of the puzzle may not be up to task.

    51. Re:cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3rd party market for separate power bricks at competitive prices.

      ..and/or more features.

      such as:
      - built-in battery
      - built-in USB port(s) (so i can charge mobile devices w/o having to power up the laptop)
      - a meter to show current/peak energy usage
      - maybe even active cooling? (some bricks I've seen can get quite uncomfortable to be around)

      Or even "crazier" features, like an iPod dock and speakers built-in, or a cellular data card and wifi.

    52. Re:cost by labnet · · Score: 1

      Was recently in London, and at one of those dodgy computer shops in Islington, saw a box of about 100 dell laptop power supplies being opened (no compliance labels). Some guy was peeling genuine looking dell power supply labels from a big roll (with serial numbers) and sticking them on. Where there's a market, there's an entreprenuer.

      --
      46137
    53. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      In the example given above, what if the power supply is overspecced, but is on a 12V 10A fuse (as most/all car cigarette lighters are).

      Put in a proper fuse. Or put a simple low value resistor in series.

      If you are manufacturing a power supply for car use (i.e., cigarette lighter plug) then put that resistor (or any other current sensing system) INTO THE SUPPLY. Design your supply to limit itself to what you have. In fact, most of the cigarette lighter plugs on inverters or other supplies I have already have a 10A fuse built it, so those devices already know they can't draw more than that. If they do, then it is poor design on their part.

      A properly specified power supply will never drop voltage to a point of current insufficiency in its usable range,

      And that's why detecting a sag is a means of detecting a supply limitation without having to have the supply and the device both singing three part harmony trying to negotiate whether the supply will sink current or the charged device will source it.

      but other pieces of the puzzle may not be up to task.

      If you are going to design a standard that will solve the whole world's problems, don't forget there are hungry children in China and AIDS is rampant in Africa.

      If you are going to limit your standard, you might as well limit it to something that will solve the problems of the vast majority of users and let the borderline cases be dealt with in other ways. E.g. if you use a car supply designed for a ten amp cigarette lighter socket on a 2A 12V supply, you deserve to get your fuses blown if the charger designer cannot detect a serious overcurrent issue and resolve it. There is no reason to expect a simple 2A 12V supply to have the smarts to negotiate with anything plugged into it for how much current it can draw or if you can put 12V back into the supply.

    54. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Most power supplies already have a digital controller inside,

      Citation required.

      I have opened up a large number of wall-wart style power supplies and have yet to find any "digital controller" inside. The closest to anything digital I've found is in the switch mode supplies that use PWM to regulate.

    55. Re:cost by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      The thing is if you plug in a usb port you can only accept 5v 100ma or the computer will disconnect the port.

      You have two options:
      - Negotiate via usb for more power if it is a computer
      - If its a dumb charger, use the signal wires set at a voltage via resistors to indicate that it is a dumb charger.

      For the latter, different resistor values determines if it can fast charge or not.

    56. Re:cost by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      The power supply may be perfectly happy putting out 20A but the wires leading to the outlet will have a maximum amperage before the melt. You can't tell that from a voltage drop.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    57. Re:cost by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Seeing as the power supply is outside the laptop, I'm not sure what you are talking about when you say "into a new one". Do you mean, would I plug the old power supply into a new laptop? If the power supply is the problem, I wouldn't. I would go buy a new power supply. If the power supply isn't the problem, then yes I would plug it into my new laptop.

      You'd really buy a whole new laptop because the power supply was bad? Weird.

    58. Re:cost by vivian · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the 78xx chips regulate by acting as a variable resistor, and burn up the difference between the input voltage and the required output voltage as waste heat, making them very inefficient if the input voltage is significantly higher than the output voltage and also requiring a lot of extra cooling. They are also limited to about 1A output, though you can use power transistors to kick this up into the 5A range.

    59. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The power supply may be perfectly happy putting out 20A but the wires leading to the outlet will have a maximum amperage before the melt. You can't tell that from a voltage drop.

      That "melt" comes from heat, which comes from power dissipation, which comes from internal resistance, which causes a voltage drop. It's not rocket science, it is simple physics. While the battery you have connected the wires to may not show any voltage drop, the end of the wires connected to the charger will see it and can act upon it.

      Of course, the ten amp fuse in the cigarette lighter plug any properly designed car charger will have will blow a long time before the 15 amp car fuse does, and the charger itself will be able to figure out that it is pulling 9 amps from a circuit that is rated at 10 amps (which is why cigarette lighter plugs have those 10A fuses in the first place) and shut itself down long before either fuse blows.

    60. Re:cost by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It does absolutely open the door to a universal power connector with more than two connections. I'd expect there would have to be at least four (power, ground, data in, data out) but it could be even more than that. Of course these new multipin connectors are going to be fragile on both the supply and the device, leading to yet another point of failure.

      Apple has a multipin connector that is robust on both the supply and the device (as stated by Timothy above, added to the submission, that he hopes it would be like the Apple connector). However, even that erroneously assumes you must have multiple pins. When the data handshake is done before power is applied, there's no reason why you couldn't handshake over the same connection as the power. There are plenty of devices out there which send communications signals over cables also carrying power. So I don't see how you would have "at least" 4, when I can conceive of doing it with just 2.

      I understand that some people might be frustrated with having custom connectors to ensure the wrong power supply isn't connected but what this does is mandate a standard connector and incompatible power supplies which is hardly the solution.

      That's just stupid. It doesn't "mandate [...] incompatible power supplies." It mandates the connector and connecting capability. That means that if you lose your laptop adapter (left it in the hotel for a business trip) you can borrow one from someone and, even if it may not work because of the electrical standard, you will never end up with what happened to me when I was on a business trip and my laptop power supply failed. I located another one from the same company with the same voltage and sufficient amperage and the connector didn't fit, so I got to run on battery until it failed because the local store also didn't carry something that fit my apparently freakishly rare Lenovo connector.

      That they could also take the time to make something stronger than most current connectors and more forgiving for cord-pull problems is a bonus as well. Because one of the largest cause of motherboard replacements (when I last dealt with laptop repairs) is the power cord jack working loose.

    61. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You have two options:

      Option 3: assume that you can take at least 100ma without negotiation and don't discharge completely while trying to negotiate via USB protocols with a dumb charger.

      Option 4: start by taking 100ma, then try 150ma, then 200ma, until the port is shut down, then disconnect and allow the port to restore, and then draw the last known current.

      See, two more options. Neither one requires smart chargers or special cables with munged data lines so they can't be used as normal USB cables.

    62. Re:cost by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Forgot the simplest option:

      Option 5: Attempt to negotiate with the potential host and if there is no response to negotiations assume you are connected to a dumb charger and consume the power you need, with the caveat that you limit yourself to what the supply can provide.

    63. Re:cost by trum4n · · Score: 1

      You are correct, i believe it's the LM22673 that is the adjustable switching regulator. My mistake. Power MOSFET's are so small these days, you can fit 400amps worth on a dime. Still puts that power supply under 20$. And, a side note, laptop builders need to learn how to move heat anyway.

    64. Re:cost by trum4n · · Score: 1

      I corrected myself. Sorry. Jerk.

    65. Re:cost by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      But that isn't what they are doing, and hence is completely irrelevant.

    66. Re:cost by trum4n · · Score: 1

      I am well aware that idiots run the world. Thanks.

    67. Re:cost by swalve · · Score: 1

      Laptop power supplies.

    68. Re:cost by swalve · · Score: 1

      And a shady printing middle man willing to print anything, as long as they get their cut. "It needs to be union made? Sure, I can print that on there."

    69. Re:cost by black+soap · · Score: 1

      Just like they sell laptops without install/recovery disks? Bad example.

    70. Re:cost by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Well we're already well on the way to cheap power supplies, at least on handhelds. Most smartphones these days are dropping their proprietary bullshit for Micro USB. The problem with laptops for now is that they don't all necessarily have the same power requirements. Modern smartphones are designed to charge on USB, which already has an energy standard.

    71. Re:cost by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Have you priced car or home charger for any USB-based device lately? Standardization does wonders for economies of scale.

      China, of all countries, did the right thing here, their government said "All devices shall use mini-USB for charging" and so they do. I have a bunch of electronic gear from places like Alibaba and Dealextreme and pretty much everything that can be sensibly powered off 5V (including unexpected things like LED bedside clocks) all use a 5V USB-tyle power supply. Just that alone would solve a massive amount of power-supply problems.

    72. Re:cost by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Now plug it into your car, 12-16 volts unregulated.

      ... with spikes to 30 or 40 or 100V, as other gear switches on and off.

      Car power supplies are dirty. Really dirty.

      It's not difficult to clean them, but you need to include shunts in both directions, over-volt protection (in both directions) and lots of other protection. Not difficult, but not trivial either.

      Mains is a lot, lot cleaner. Even pretty dirty mains.

      Ever seen an AC voltage regulator blow it's guts? Not a pretty sight. Wonder why we had an AC voltage regulator AND a spare on site? That's dirty power. Nearest mains power supply was a kilometre off-site, and would require the permission of 5 land owners to run a cable, and would have given us about 25V AC by the time it got to us. Would have taken months, for a 3-week job. We were considering a dedicated diesel generator for our equipment and let the rest of the service companies talk to our management about plugging in.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Study Design a Must by nimrod108 · · Score: 1

    The most important thing about this standard is that they need to use a plug resistant to damage. I have 2 laptops at home that work perfectly except the power connection has come loose. It is so frustrating!

    --
    $2.50 for a decade.
    1. Re:Study Design a Must by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Nothing a bit of solder and epoxy cant fix.

    2. Re:Study Design a Must by RedACE7500 · · Score: 2

      It's a common flaw with most laptops that they eventually stop working when not plugged in.

    3. Re:Study Design a Must by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Just don't put HP in charge of coming up with a standard! They have a horrible track record at this! I've had two HP notebooks, a ZD7000 and a DV9000, and both of them developed power connector issues within two years. This is well documented. One would think that there ought to be a cable or charger of some sort that would allow you to charge via USB, since that works for most mobile phones and small devices, but maybe the USB spec can't handle the amount of power necessary to power the whole computer.

    4. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not true, copper leads inside the plug can fatigue resulting in plastic deformation (loose contacts) or brittle failure (total failure) Some plugs are non-trivial to replace even with good desoldering skills/equipment and some cannot even be separated from their daughterboards, which greatly increases replacement costs.

    5. Re:Study Design a Must by nimrod108 · · Score: 1

      So they will include a solder gun and a tube of epoxy in the standard?

      --
      $2.50 for a decade.
    6. Re:Study Design a Must by teslafreak · · Score: 2

      It can't. USB specification is (I believe) 5 watts maximum, at around 5 volts (so 5v at a max of 1 amp). Most notebook adapters are in the area of 20v and 6 amps or so (around 120 watts). Also, can you imagine someone plugging their laptop into itself to charge. You know it would happen :-)

    7. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one (and only) area I will give apple a brownie point, they have those magnetic connectors that can't really be damaged, at least on the laptop.
      You hit it and it simply falls off.
      I've not had one my self, so I can't say how well they work in keeping connected when they should be, but really it's not a bad start at all!

    8. Re:Study Design a Must by squidguy · · Score: 1

      maybe the USB spec can't handle the amount of juice necessary to power the whole computer. Bingo. No way you can pull that much power, at least with existing USB architectures. Perhaps a small netbook or maybe a tablet, but nothing mainstream.

    9. Re:Study Design a Must by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Then you could just plug your laptop into it's own USB port and you're all set!

    10. Re:Study Design a Must by Elros · · Score: 1

      That's one thing the magnet attachment system is really handy for. Bought a brand new Dell and the power cord is slightly loose out of the box. Only complaint I have about the system, but it's annoying when it works itself just barely loose. I leave it sit and come back to a dead battery.

    11. Re:Study Design a Must by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I like the way you think!

      Oh, and on the plug, width is proportionate to voltage, height is proportionate to current. So if you can jam the plug in, you're assured that close enough to the right rating. Obviously this would also require a key so it will only go in one way. You may cite this as prior art if you like.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    12. Re:Study Design a Must by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Ever plug a GPS into a smartphone with USB? Usually the GPS says to itself "Oh look, a connection. I'll just charge up my battery...".

    13. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perpetual motion ftw!

    14. Re:Study Design a Must by sexconker · · Score: 0

      This is one (and only) area I will give apple a brownie point, they have those magnetic connectors that can't really be damaged, at least on the laptop.
      You hit it and it simply falls off.
      I've not had one my self, so I can't say how well they work in keeping connected when they should be, but really it's not a bad start at all!

      Apple didn't do anything. They just copied an existing design used in many household electric devices.

      Apple's patent is for an electr[strong]onic[/strong] device, while prior designs are for electr[strong]ic[/strong].
      It's a bullshit patent, basically. No one sees it as a big enough feature to challenge it, though, because honestly, if you lose a laptop due to tripping, you're just going to go right out and buy another one. You're not gonna pony up even more in unexpected costs for a Mac.

    15. Re:Study Design a Must by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      A laptop computer is not a GPS unit. What exactly is your point?

    16. Re:Study Design a Must by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      That USB devices will try to recharge themselves from inappropriate places?

    17. Re:Study Design a Must by shmlco · · Score: 2

      "They just copied an existing design used in many household electric devices."

      Okay. Just out of curiosity, would you care to point me to a half dozen or so? I've bought and used "many" household electric devices, and I've yet to own a single one that used a bi-directional magnetic power connector.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    18. Re:Study Design a Must by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have a Mac Book. I am above all this nonsense PC people have to deal with.

    19. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Erm, wouldn't bringing this technology to laptops not count as doing something? Even if this used in many (i.e. not many in the west) appliances, it's not as if this was a mainstream feature in computing prior to magsafe. I would hope though that the patent would be challenged by prior art, as you're right that it's not an invention as such - more applying existing technology in a fairly obvious and sensible way. I can't help but disagree though with pretty much everything else you wrote. Here's why:

      1) I'm not entirely convinced that you speak for all hardware manufacturers worldwide, and every laptop owner in the world.

      2) I have damaged laptops in the past by tripping on the cable. Caught my current power cable a few times now, but the magsafe kept the machine from harm. It's a big enough feature if you're primarily using laptops and you don't consider the purchase of a replacement laptop to be as trivial as popping out for a box of Marlboro.

      Easy on the hyperbole, try to avoid bizarre generalisations, and avoid weasel words like "many" when in fact you're referring to a pretty small subset of whatever it is you're citing as proof that the stuff you done thunk up is plenty right.

    20. Re:Study Design a Must by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      We just get more of them... Plug in a USB hub and plug 6 USB chargers in.... That'll do the trick.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:Study Design a Must by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Does that include a magical miniature hamster wheel that charges the battery? If not, you might consider rereading what you replied to.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    22. Re:Study Design a Must by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      My old Sony laptop had this sort of damage internally, but when it happened(it was on and plugged in) it caused a short somewhere and seemingly fried the mobo. No solder or epoxy could fix that

    23. Re:Study Design a Must by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      So do human males.

    24. Re:Study Design a Must by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Standard USB cannot, but the derivative Power USB can. I actually used to have a fan monitor/card reader that had Power USB ports, but I never had any Power USB devices to use with them.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    25. Re:Study Design a Must by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Do those things use permanent magnets? Doesn't that get crap all collected on them over time?

      Or do they use a portion of the current when connected to power an electromagnet?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    26. Re:Study Design a Must by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Hope you have a solid state drive

    27. Re:Study Design a Must by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's a damn shame they don't have these little things to indicate such things. Oh! I know! We can make these little lights! We can call them indicator lights!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:Study Design a Must by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My MacBook Pro is powered by my ego. It's been four years without needing a single charge.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:Study Design a Must by Elros · · Score: 1

      The thing is plugged in when I leave it. However, a few hours (and probably a few nudges from the cat) later, it's too loose and out of power.

    30. Re:Study Design a Must by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      It seems to be a permanent magnet, but no they don't appear to pick up crap over time. I've got one a couple of years old, and another probably five years old. Neither connector looks anything other than brand new (not counting the scratched plastic shells that is).

      Both still work perfectly.

    31. Re:Study Design a Must by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      I own this: http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/8/KitchenBath/2/Appliances/DeepFryers/PRD~0431679P/T-Fal%252BEZ%252BClean%252BPro%252BDeep%252BFryer.jsp?locale=en and it has a magnetic power connector... I don't know about 'bi-directional' - never checked.

    32. Re:Study Design a Must by sexconker · · Score: 0

      Plenty of toasters, deep fryers, crock pots, etc. came with them in the 60s and 70s.
      A few electric lawnmowers used them as well, though the leashed lawnmower didn't last long at all.

    33. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BOTH repeat BOTH my MacBooks ( 17in MPB, 13in MB) have user changeable Batteries. Ok?

    34. Re:Study Design a Must by zill · · Score: 1

      It's very common on medium to high-end deep fryers. A simple google search return two dozen models with magnetic cords.

    35. Re:Study Design a Must by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Ever plug a GPS into a smartphone with USB? Usually the GPS says to itself "Oh look, a connection. I'll just charge up my battery...".

      Why would your smartphone even try to put 5V onto the USB connection? Not very smart, I'd say. It shouldn't be acting as a host in that respect no matter what, given the battery capacity.

    36. Re:Study Design a Must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That must be how the Prius works too...

    37. Re:Study Design a Must by wsanders · · Score: 1

      Or make the PS auto-sense the required voltage. I dumpster-dived a Targus laptop supply a few years back. Their absurdly overpriced tips simply include a resistor which feeds back a sense voltage to the PS though an additional lead in the cable, so with the addition of a trimmer resistor heat-shrinked into the power cable I now have a power supply that (with the aid of a voltmeter) will deliver between 9 and 20-something volts. This kind of feedback can be built into a PS for cheap.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    38. Re:Study Design a Must by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Instead of lights... those get tired and burn out... I propose we move to a little plastic nub that pops out when it's done like those things in turkeys.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    39. Re:Study Design a Must by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      My magnetic cord in my former Macbook Pro was great, until the battery stopped working. Then it got REALLY annoying whenever the cord "jumped out".

      No, I could not replace the battery. The heat-damage on the poor thing had twisted everything out of place already. The hardware was just too good to be true, and it was.

      Now a happy owner of 18.2" Acer beast :)

    40. Re:Study Design a Must by knarf · · Score: 1

      I have a Mac Book. I am above all this nonsense PC people have to deal with.

      Silly fanboi, Macs are PCs. PCs with their own share of problems, from bulging batteries to failing keyboards (Dutch, use some translator if you can't read it) to, well, attitude problems in its users it seems...

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    41. Re:Study Design a Must by genner · · Score: 1

      My MacBook Pro is powered by my ego. It's been four years without needing a single charge.

      Ah yes..........the Ed Begley Jr. battery.

    42. Re:Study Design a Must by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then you could just plug your laptop into it's own USB port and you're all set!

      That would be cool, I could power my laptop from its own USB port while I am busy copying my mp3s onto itself via USB! It has to work with USB2, though, because the volume of stuff I have to copy is too large and would take longer that one charging cycle otherwise.

      Of course, I could always just turn the volume down and get done copying faster. I should have thought of that before.

    43. Re:Study Design a Must by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You're still not getting it.

      Since you're being a thickheaded mule, I'll spell it out for you:

      Batteries don't hold infinite power. -any- laptop you leave powered on long enough without AC power will die.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    44. Re:Study Design a Must by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 1

      I saw similar magnetic connectors in household appliances in Japan before Apple used them for laptops: my rice cooker and the water heater both had them.

    45. Re:Study Design a Must by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Dunno if there is a phone that does this, but I could see the merit in a tablet with a fully functional USB socket. You could use USB sticks, external drives and external printers on it.
      They would have to supply power, in order to use the USB stick and some external drives.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    46. Re:Study Design a Must by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You could use USB sticks, external drives and external printers on it.

      Yes, I can see merit to USB sticks, but an external drive is going to pull way too much power to have much use. An external printer is going to give you about five minutes of battery life for your tablet.

      But for a cellphone? No. Most cellphones ARE the USB stick.

  3. Mod summary up! by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife used to knock over her iBook all the time. When we got a dog, it fell off the coffee table twice as often. We replaced it with a MacBook some time back, and it's only hit the ground once in like five years. With a kid having been added to the mix since then, that number would have been a lot worse without the magnetic plug.

    Of course, the kid has come pretty close to doing some other things. He went through a phase of being fascinated by watching water pour over different things.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your dog falls off your coffee table twice as often as your iBook? Why do you keep your dog on your coffee table? If he's that prone to falls you should keep him/her on the floor.

    2. Re:Mod summary up! by poodlehat · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been on the mailing list for this working group for about a year now (I am an IEEE-SA member but you don't have to be to be on a WG), and one of the first things I brought up is my tendency to drop my electronics :) A bit more detail, the current thinking is that it will use CAN 2.0 for the link layer but the physical layer is still being hashed out. The device needs communication to negotiate between the power adapter and the device to be powered. The device and power supply will communicate things like if it sourcing or sinking current (or capable of doing both), whether it is a battery, an intermittent supply like wind or solar, etc. It sounds pretty cool if manufacturers go along with it.

    3. Re:Mod summary up! by Albanach · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is there a patent on MagSafe? I had a deep fat fryer with a magnetic power cable in 2004. Apple's patent was filed on Christmas Day 2007.

    4. Re:Mod summary up! by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apple's patent is for that *On a Computer*

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    5. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, I own a deep fat fryer with a breakaway cord, we need patent reform!

    6. Re:Mod summary up! by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Because patents are for implementations and not for broad concepts like "magnetic power cable"?

    7. Re:Mod summary up! by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I posted above, but it's because patents apply to electric and electronic devices separately, for some reason.
      Basically, patent office bullshit.

    8. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovation = adding 3 words

    9. Re:Mod summary up! by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Really it's a matter of the amount of force used to hold the plug in. It doesn't matter the source of the force. I well built connector (such as on my toshibas) will come out when the force exceeds that of the maximum weight of the cable pulling down on it, but is less than the friction force holding the item in place.

      My Toshiba does that just as well as a friends MacBook, without a proprietary magnetic connector.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    10. Re:Mod summary up! by arielCo · · Score: 1

      He made an interesting choice, though - replaced the dog with a MacBook *and* a kid.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    11. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But have you ever used a MagSafe cable *On Weeeeeed*???

    12. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANA(P)L, but if someones bored or feels like chucking a couple of thousand dollars into a pot have the patent reexamined and produce the prior art you mention.. it won't stand up to it if the only change is 'on a computer'; it's insubstantial and frankly obvious.

    13. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to stereotype, but it seems like women treat their electronics like unwanted stepchildren. Between my ex-wife and all my current female friends, they have beaten up laptops that have been dropped and had drinks spilled on them. I have never dropped a laptop or computer. The only time I have seen a drink spilled on a computer was when my friend poured a can of coke onto a 486 motherboard to see how long it would take to fry.

      Who the hell puts their laptop somewhere precarious, or runs the cord through an area where human traffic is expected?

    14. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      patent troll 2.0

    15. Re:Mod summary up! by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Like a high stakes version of the fortune cookie 'in bed' game.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    16. Re:Mod summary up! by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      That concept works in tension, but not in shear/bending.

    17. Re:Mod summary up! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Innovation = adding 3 words

      You'd rather the patent be so broad that those 3 words didn't make a difference?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in today's technology world, you can't know for sure that that company didn't just rip off the 2007 patent filing, just getting to market first.

    19. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's MagSafe differs in that it's DC instead of AC and it contains a pin for signaling the charge state to the power brick (allowing the brick to turn off if charging is complete, and to indicate the charge state with a colored LED). It's the same idea, just a little evolved.

    20. Re:Mod summary up! by wukka · · Score: 2

      hiya Albanach, no kidding! liekwise I had a really old hot waterpot that had a break-away magnetic powercord. it is like Apple is trying to patent a paperclip for use on things other than paper...or someone sayin."No way dude, you can't unbend a paperclip to use for unjamming a disc drive, that was my idea!" Apple already dominates a big piece of the pie, yet it is using schoolyard bully tactics...next they will claim the letter "i" and sue the poor muppets on Sesame Street! Apple thinks it invented the touchscreen, when it is actually really old technology...I'm never ever going to pay a premium to use a product of such a childish company. I will choose somethin such as Asus Transformer over Ipad2 any day. Apple, fuggem. cheers!

    21. Re:Mod summary up! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Are you willing to test out that theory in court?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A totally non-obvious adaptation.

    23. Re:Mod summary up! by spud603 · · Score: 1

      I hate to stereotype

      Then you should probably try not doing so. As a certified nerd you ought to know that anecdotal evidence isn't enough to make a strong conclusion, and that holds double for topics underpinned by strong and persistent cultural biases.

    24. Re:Mod summary up! by arisvega · · Score: 1

      You cannot be serious.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    25. Re:Mod summary up! by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      They should deliberately use the idea and if Apple sue them, take it up with the supreme courts. That's one battle I'd like to see.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    26. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're misunderstanding him. The "deep fat fryer" is really his Dell Latitude with a bottle of canola oil on top.

    27. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with the US patent system. It encourages invention (just not within the US)

    28. Re:Mod summary up! by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I bet I could pull the Toshiba in question off the table with the power cord. With a macbook's magnetic connector that's simply impossible (I know, I just tried).

    29. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with usual barrel connector there's a simple fix: short extension cable (female-male barrel connector ~10cm long) connected to the laptop, that way there will always be a straight pull pulling the two barrel connectors apart

    30. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dog falls off your coffee table twice as often as your iBook? Why do you keep your dog on your coffee table? If he's that prone to falls you should keep him/her on the floor.

      Perhaps the dog would not have fallen off the coffee table if his wife was not knocking it over. (Animal abuse?)
      Fortunately, they replaced the dog with a MacBook, which has withstood his wife's abuse better than the dog.
      They also added a kid to the mix, but didn't say how often the kid has fallen off the coffee table. (Perhaps his wife does not punch the kid as much as she did the iBook or dog.)
      On the other hand, perhaps the coffee table has a defect...

    31. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Apple makes toys, not computers.

    32. Re:Mod summary up! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is, as much as I'd like to see it, I just don't see much that invention going on outside the US. Sure, I see some good projects happening, like the high-energy physics research in Switzerland, but entrepreneurship? Not a whole lot. The Chinese are great at setting up big factories and making stuff in huge volumes, but I don't exactly see a lot of inventions coming out of there either, just stuff designed in the USA.

      From what I've read, a lot of countries simply aren't very friendly to invention and entrepreneurship. In Germany, for instance, it's almost impossible to declare bankruptcy and default on business debt, so no one ever starts a small business unless they're really really sure it's going to work, and if it doesn't, they end up spending the rest of their life paying off the debt and never try again. In the US, it's a little different: most new businesses fail before 10 years, so it's the investor's/bank's job to make sure they're making a good investment, because if the business fails, it declares bankruptcy and the lender/investor loses their money. Since the reward for a successful business is very good compared to the investment, if the idea is good it's not that hard to find investors willing to take the risk.

      Maybe I'm missing something, because I'd really like to see some other countries give the USA some stiff competition when it comes to invention and innovation, because we need the competition so we can clean up our own house and improve the ways we do things (such as by eliminating software patents, and cleaning up the USPTO in general, as well as fixing our economic systems). But I just don't see a lot of it.

    33. Re:Mod summary up! by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      Whew! At first, I thought you were about to make unlicensed mention of iDeasTM. Glad you deleted that!

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    34. Re:Mod summary up! by Temujin_12 · · Score: 1

      Apple's patent is for that *On a Computer*

      Ya, but BOTH get equally as hot.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    35. Re:Mod summary up! by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      If you've really looked around a MagSafe you'd see there is a bit more to it than attaching a magnet to a power cord. The pins are spring-loaded so that the circuit cannot close unless they are depressed, preventing you from accidentally shorting it out and causing a fire. Sure, no one cares about this feature with the typical coax type connector that is held in by friction, because the powered wire is recessed, but you can't really do that if you are trying to get rid of the whole friction thing so it can come undone safely.

    36. Re:Mod summary up! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      What would change from how it is today?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    37. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is there a patent on MagSafe? I had a deep fat fryer with a magnetic power cable in 2004. Apple's patent was filed on Christmas Day 2007.

      I don't suppose you can remember the make or model?

    38. Re:Mod summary up! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, Apple would have to license using a magnet on their connector from a company that makes kitchen wares. Every other product you'd buy would be the result of lots of seemingly unrelated patents getting licensed.

      Broad patents are bad, mmkay. That's why 'on a computer' is patentable. If you think software shouldn't be patented, fine, I don't give a shit, but you should be happy 'on a computer' is enough to be considered non-infringing or you'd really see a grinding halt to innovation.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    39. Re:Mod summary up! by treeves · · Score: 1

      Yes. Next question?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    40. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they replace the dog or the coffee table with the MacBook?

    41. Re:Mod summary up! by treeves · · Score: 1

      Never mind. I wasn't paying attention. Carry on.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    42. Re:Mod summary up! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The device needs communication to negotiate between the power adapter and the device to be powered. The device and power supply will communicate things like if it sourcing or sinking current (or capable of doing both), whether it is a battery, an intermittent supply like wind or solar, etc. It sounds pretty cool if manufacturers go along with it.

      There's cool and then there is practical.

      A cell phone isn't going to source power to anything. My PDA isn't going to source power to anything. My camera isn't going to source power to anything. My cell phone charger isn't going to sink power from anything. My computer isn't going to source power to anything (via the charging jack). It isn't going to sink power from anything (on the USB ports). My computer charger isn't going to sink power from anything except the mains, and if you build that charger with the same plug for the mains that you use for the device, you are stupid.

      The problem is not that the devices we have are not smart enough, it is that the number of different voltages they were designed to source or sink is too large, and the number of different kinds of connectors is too high.

      Laptops, in particular, already have the DC/DC conversion hardware built in to provide the internal voltages, and there is no reason that they cannot be built to accept a range of input voltages from 12 to 19 instead of frying themselves if you put 18.2V into an 18V connection. The same concepts that allow the now ubiquitous 100-250VAC wall warts would allow laptops to have a wide range of input voltages.

      The only thing this complexity is good for is making an industry around supplying smart charging devices that they can charge extra for because they are smart, and shutting out small companies who want to fill niche markets but cannot afford the cost of a fullblown smart charging device, or private individuals who want to build their own.

      Yes, a full-blown USB connection needs to have a smart communication system so the devices can tell the host what they are and etc. No, a device built to charge through a USB connection doesn't need to communicate shit, all it needs to do is see 5V on the input and assume that it is connected to something that will limit the current it will provide if necessary. That means you can use any 5V supply to charge it, whether that is a laptop, a battery, or a wind turbine.

      Please stop this headlong rush into "cool" and settle for practical. These supposed requirements for communications really aren't necessary, at least not for the vast majority of charger/device issues. At the base level, a charger supplies a specific voltage and up to a certain current; any current draw over the limit can be detected by the device and it can either back off or the charger will shut off. Make that voltage a standard, and use a common connector, and the vast majority of issues go POOF! If there truly are border cases that demand this level of intelligence in devices and chargers, then apply those higher standards to THOSE DEVICES, but make the manufacturer justify it so they can't just claim "special case, you need to buy my special overpriced charger" like Sony does for their eReaders. If a laptop manufacturer says "we can't design a laptop that will take 19V input, so we need to have a special case 15.8V charger for it", they should be laughed out of the marketplace, not allowed to profit from stupidity.

    43. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding "On a computer" or "on a mobile device" as grounds for a patent is really lame. Although magsafe is frickin brilliant.

    44. Re:Mod summary up! by vinn01 · · Score: 1

      My kid went through a phase of being fascinated by magnets. A neighbor gave him "rare earth magnets". My MacBookPro died a couple of days after that. The PRAM (parameter RAM) was scrambled as was a good portion of the hard drive. I tried to reset the PRAM and reload the hard drive, but it was still unstable. Eventually, I had to replace the hard drive.

      And my kid fried the MagSafe power supply too, by sticking his magnets up against the connector end. ...
      I hate those magnets so gawd damn much

    45. Re:Mod summary up! by suutar · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the innovative aspect of MagSafe is that it's symmetric; you can put the plug either side up and it still works. Fryer cords are apparently (I haven't owned one) keyed, so they have a definite top and bottom.

    46. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it does - see Microsoft's solution to the problem of xbox control pads yanking the console onto the floor. Simply include another connector in the line of the power cable. They didn't even use a proprietary connector! Sometimes the simplest solutions are the best.

    47. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Apple fanbois such as yourself, yes, we would.

    48. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck are you 'informative' with a dumb-ass question like that?!

    49. Re:Mod summary up! by leptons · · Score: 1

      It's all fine unless you come across a metal shaving or a tiny screw that lodges itself in there due to the magnetic force, and shorts out your connector anyway. I can't count the number of times the magnetic connector on my macbook has attracted just such a piece of metal and caused problems. the magnetic connector is not perfect, in fact i'd be more happy with a traditional connector & being more aware of how/where the cord is placed.

    50. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize that Apple fanbois weren't ignorant.

    51. Re:Mod summary up! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your particular toshiba but every toshiba i've seen with an external power brick* uses a barrel style connector.

      The problem with most connectors you see on laptops is the direction of the force needed to remove them. To remove them you need to apply a force very close to directly away from the connector face. pulling in other directions will just tend to jam them in the socket.

      In most situations where a cable is likely to be tripped over the force will most likely have a downward component and a component in some random horizontal direction. With magsafe this will pop the connector off. With a conventional connector it is very likely not to.

      Though there are other systems that can achive the same outcome of disconnecting a cable that is pulled downwards. For example many third party power bricks have right angled interchangable end peices. A downward force on these cables will cause the end peice to disconnect from the cable. IIRC MS put inline joins in the cables to the pads of the original xbox for similar reasons.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    52. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late. They already replaced the dog with a MacBook, as you would have seen if you read things more carefully.

    53. Re:Mod summary up! by initialE · · Score: 1

      Well then someone should patent it *On a mobile phone*

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    54. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the cash to back that patent up.

    55. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you read the comment? He replaced the dog with the MacBook.

    56. Re:Mod summary up! by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Both Apple and the makers of the magnetic power cords for deep fat fryers and Japanese kitchen appliances seem happy with this interpretation.

    57. Re:Mod summary up! by westcoast+philly · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sorry, I thought he replaced the wife with the MacBook, once he had the dog. Of course he never said the original iBook fell off the table, to begin with. Maybe it never did, and the new MacBook hasn't yet either.
      2 x 0 = 0 right? Or is it ERR?
      Then again, "He" might be "She." The baby might just be mixed up by how it all was worded.

    58. Re:Mod summary up! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, Apple would have to license using a magnet on their connector from a company that makes kitchen wares. Every other product you'd buy would be the result of lots of seemingly unrelated patents getting licensed.

      Broad patents are bad, mmkay. That's why 'on a computer' is patentable. If you think software shouldn't be patented, fine, I don't give a shit, but you should be happy 'on a computer' is enough to be considered non-infringing or you'd really see a grinding halt to innovation.

      I don't have any particular problem with requiring narrow patents, but I don't think it makes much difference in this situation as it simply means that the kitchen wares company should/would apply for many magnetic power connector patents on every type of device they can think of.

    59. Re:Mod summary up! by reason · · Score: 1

      I'm glad no-one patented "having a power cable *on a computer*", "having a power cable "*on a kitchen appliance*", etc. Patents eventually expire, but not if adding obvious, trivial applications to existing technology makes whole new patents.

    60. Re:Mod summary up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Apple 'borrowed' this then?

    61. Re:Mod summary up! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      An even bigger problem than pulling the laptop off the table is simply breaking the power socket. Back when I used to fix computer for a living we saw dozens of machines like that a week, compared to relatively few with fall damage. I think it is down to people using their laptops on their lap or bed and putting a strain on the connector (which often sticks straight out). This another advantage of Apple's MagSafe plug; not only is it low profile but it won't shear the socket off the PCB with lateral force.

      Fixing the power socket is quite a bit job. The laptop has to be completely stripped and the motherboard removed. Then you fight the crappy lead-free solder that is keeping the remains on and eventually solder a new socket in. Of course they sockets are all custom sizes. Sony have started putting them on the end of a cable so they are easier to fix, although they still charge you the same of course.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    62. Re:Mod summary up! by swalve · · Score: 1

      They only raise the voltages to make the electronics easier. They would probably love to be able to design a laptop that has a power brick that provides the same voltage as the battery, but providing that kind of wattage over a long cord and a light, small adapter gets difficult. There was a short time when laptops could be plugged directly into the wall, but that went away as size and lightness went away. And probably safety. Nobody wants lightning to come out of their laptop when they spill coffee on it, as would happen with that.

    63. Re:Mod summary up! by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      A cell phone isn't going to source power to anything. My PDA isn't going to source power to anything[...]

      You don't anticipate them supplying power to the USB peripherals (memory sticks) you plug into them?

      [...] My computer isn't going to source power to anything (via the charging jack). [...]

      It would be a nice feature if it could, so you could feed one device from another's battery (I do that a lot charging my phone from my laptop when travelling), but I agree it almost certainly won't happen - at least not with the standard under discussion, which is complex and yet not sophisticated in the way USB

      Yes, a full-blown USB connection needs to have a smart communication system so the devices can tell the host what they are and etc. No, a device built to charge through a USB connection doesn't need to communicate shit, all it needs to do is see 5V on the input and assume that it is connected to something that will limit the current it will provide if necessary. That means you can use any 5V supply to charge it, whether that is a laptop, a battery, or a wind turbine.

      I often charge my cell phone from my laptop, as the phone charges over USB. The phone can also be a USB master. For reasons of bad implementation this phone can't power USB peripherals so you have to use a stupid power+USB splicing cable, but this should change if.when they make a phone that gets it right. That'd be a device charging over USB that needs to negotiate power direction.

    64. Re:Mod summary up! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Apple's patent is for that *On a Computer*

      Magnetic power connectors have been around since the late 1960s, and were mandated for deep fat fryers by the Consumer Product Safety Commission after the previous attempt at resolving accidents, short power cords, weren't effective in preventing accidents. So all you have to do is use the technology described in an 1970s (expired) patent for your connector rather than Apples 2007 patent (7,311,526, âoeMagnetic connector for electronic device") on exactly the same thing.

      Oh, or if you're feeling particularly innovative you can patent the same thing that all the others have patented, and perhaps even sue Apple for infringement. Isn't the USPTO wonderful? Just pay your fee and they'll rubberstamp anything you like.

    65. Re:Mod summary up! by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      And my kid fried the MagSafe power supply too, by sticking his magnets up against the connector end. ...

      I hate those magnets so gawd damn much

      Magnets don't kill computers, kids kill computers!

    66. Re:Mod summary up! by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Funny. But the dog is a 'he', not an 'it'.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  4. Lower efficiency by odin84gk · · Score: 1

    While I fully support a standard connector, I hope they realize that this will increase the electricity consumption of these devices, along with increasing the price of each charger.

    With that being said, I significantly prefer convenience over efficiency, so I am looking forward to what they come up with.

    1. Re:Lower efficiency by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      While I fully support a standard connector, I hope they realize that this will increase the electricity consumption of these devices, along with increasing the price of each charger.

      When I measured my laptop's power consumption it was taking 25W at the wall; so turning off a light bulb would save more money.

    2. Re:Lower efficiency by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      how does this increase consumption?

      if I take my 19 volt 4 amp power supply into one laptop that draws 2 amps, it still draws 2 amps

    3. Re:Lower efficiency by Ruke · · Score: 1

      Why is that? Because a brick for a 10 watt device is going to have to be over-engineered to provide up to 130 watts? (The summary's "240" appears to be incorrect, based on the IEEE working group description.)

    4. Re:Lower efficiency by hedwards · · Score: 2

      To be honest, this isn't like cell phones where standardizing around micro USB was enough. Laptops use different amounts of power and making it so that the same charger will work on a netbook as a desktop replacement is hardly a wise idea.

      There are certain things that can relatively easily be standardized, such as the polarity of the connector, but when it comes down to voltage and amperage, you're better off setting it up so that there's a small assortment of connectors available, and one combination of voltage and amperage per connector. So that if it fits it's not going to damage the machine.

      Also, WTF is up with manufacturers that don't bother to label their power supplies? I really appreciate that Epson and Creative bother to put their names directly on the transformer so that I have that many fewer I have to check to determine if it's the one I want. I just wish I had realized years ago that I need to label the power bricks before I waste a lot of time looking for the one with the correct output and connector.

    5. Re:Lower efficiency by Arlet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could imagine that efficiency will improve. Right now, a laptop manufacturer that includes their own power brick has not much incentive to make it really efficient. It's easier just to make a bigger one with a cheaper design.

      With a standard connector, there will be 3rd party vendors that offer standard bricks, and some vendors will aim for the highest efficiency as a selling point.

    6. Re:Lower efficiency by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      At the cost of using more magnetic components it's perfectly possible to keep efficiency of the power supply constant over a larger range than is usual now (essentially just use multiple smaller power supplies in parallel and turn them off as necessary). So it wouldn't necessarily increase power consumption if it was designed to handle the wider range.

    7. Re:Lower efficiency by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      I believe he is referring to the efficiency of the power system. If you are working in a specific power rating, you can fine tune the circuitry for better efficiency at those levels. With this, they have to be able to run at much broader specs.

    8. Re:Lower efficiency by j-beda · · Score: 1

      That over-engineering might result in increased efficiency. When supplying 130 watts, waste heat from inefficiencies are more important than when supplying 30 watts, so a 130W supply might be designed to only have 5% inefficiencies, compared to the 30W supply that may be acceptable with a 10% inefficiency. Thus using the 130W supply for a device drawing only 20W may result in only 0.1W of wast compared to 2W of wast if using the 20W supply.

      But what do I know? Maybe power supplies waste a set amount of energy rather than a fraction of their draw.

      In any case standardizing on a voltage and a plug/socket combo and just specifying the current drain of the device would go a long way to making the world a better place even if some "universal" power supply was created.

    9. Re:Lower efficiency by poodlehat · · Score: 1

      The bump up to 240 from 130 is currently being voted on by the WG and the ballot doesn't close until the end of this week, so it is premature to say that in the summary (but might be true real soon.)

    10. Re:Lower efficiency by emj · · Score: 1

      But butbutbut... I have no light bulb in my home that use more than 11W (but that's more than my laptop uses so I guess your point still stands.. :-)

    11. Re:Lower efficiency by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      how does this increase consumption?

      if I take my 19 volt 4 amp power supply into one laptop that draws 2 amps, it still draws 2 amps

      No, it draws something like 2.01 amps. Some environmentalists think the additional .01 amp draw is a big deal, despite that more polution would come from the design and manufacture of multiple power supplies each of which is ever so slightly more efficient.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    12. Re:Lower efficiency by ffejie · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the people who design cheap chargers for computers compare at all about efficiency in the AC Adapter. I would guess that they just care that it passes compliance testing and doesn't explode into flames too often. The people who care about efficiency are working on the actual device.

      --
      Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
    13. Re:Lower efficiency by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Most switchmode power supplies (SMPS) tend to increase efficiency as you reach their optimum/maximum rating. Using a SMPS at 40% of its rated capacity usually has less efficiency than using it at 95% of its rated capacity. So a 130W power supply providing 120W might be 94% efficient (dissipating 7.7W of heat), but when that 130W power supply is only delivering 40W of power it may be just 80% efficient (dissipating 10W of heat).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    14. Re:Lower efficiency by bored · · Score: 1

      Look at the 80+ specifications (the base level is only 80% which is by itself pretty hard). The power supplies are only rated at 20%, 50% and 100%. That is because its hard to build a powersupply that maintains a constant efficiency across such a broad range and behaves as an ideal current source. I've got a couple of pretty good 80+ powersupplies, and my PC often falls below 5% of the rated capacity. At those levels the efficiency goes to crap (say 40% efficient),

    15. Re:Lower efficiency by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the people who design cheap chargers for computers compare at all about efficiency in the AC Adapter.

      Shit, most of em don't even care if their adapter draws significant amounts of power just being plugged in, with no device attached. Half the crap-ass power bricks sitting around my house are warm even when doing nothing.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    16. Re:Lower efficiency by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      More like 5.

      I'd advise you measure. It's not so small as you think.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:Lower efficiency by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      You can gain efficiency by building your power supply around a particular amperage. Additionally, there are significant size and weight savings to be had for driving a 20W netbook off of a 20W power supply vs a 95W power supply for a 19" gaming laptop.

      Of course, the IEEE wouldn't be so shortsighted to pick a spec where all laptops use the exact same supply. I'd expect a range of power supplies: ie up to 20W, up to 50W, up to 100W, etc.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    18. Re:Lower efficiency by 2short · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, a brick that can provide 10 watts will need some cheap electronics so when you plug it into a 130 watt device, they will gracefully refuse to work. If you plug a brick capable of 130 watts into a 10 watt device, maybe you paid too much for the brick, and it won't be as efficient, but it will work.

      Personally, I've got 4 or 5 devices I want to plug in, not generally at the same time, but in 3 or 4 locations. If I could stop carrying power bricks around, and leave one that can handle my laptop at each spot, I'd gladly eat the inefficiency when I plug in my phone.

    19. Re:Lower efficiency by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Dell uses the same connector for all their bricks and notebooks. They have a couple of different wattages, but the notebooks will power on even if using a lower wattage brick, just at reduced efficiency. So the ideal of one power brick for all notebooks is quite feasible.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    20. Re:Lower efficiency by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Laptops all generally use between 10 and 50 watts. I havent seen a laptop that would consume much more than 50-- i think the highest voltage rating ive seen on a power brick is 23v, and the amperage wasnt that high.

    21. Re:Lower efficiency by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      and some vendors will ship really cheap shitty bricks that are far less efficiant than any manufacturer would dream of shipping.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:Lower efficiency by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I could imagine that efficiency will improve. Right now, a laptop manufacturer that includes their own power brick has not much incentive to make it really efficient.

      Actually that's false. A big portion of the cost of designing and manufacturing electronics comes into the cooling component of it. The laptop requires a constant power so any inefficiencies will simply be radiated out as heat from the powerpack. In order to prevent creating a fire hazard the resulting pack needs to be designed in such a way that it will only reach a certain temperature in a certain orientation. Often this means bigger pack with more air, more vents, more heatsinking, all of which adds costs.

      Designing an efficient switchmode powersupply is all about selecting and using the right parts, not about selecting and using expensive parts. Often the right parts can be much cheaper than expensive parts, i.e. smaller cores on inductors if you don't select one that's oversized (which creates inefficiencies as well).

    23. Re:Lower efficiency by Macrat · · Score: 1

      When I measured my laptop's power consumption it was taking 25W at the wall; so turning off a light bulb would save more money.

      I guess you aren't using fluorescent bulbs.

    24. Re:Lower efficiency by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm typing this on a Toshiba using the standard 90W power supply it came with. 19V 4.74A

    25. Re:Lower efficiency by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      3 amps loss in a power supply is 360W of waster heat for you 110 volt-ers, and 720W for us Antipodeans. Perhaps you meant 2.05A? And it's probably more like 10% given the lack of care factor nowadays. Why spend $20K R&D plus $5 per PSU to make the PSU 5% more efficient, when you can sell it for the same price and force the customer to pay for the power forever?

    26. Re:Lower efficiency by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Wow, my brain was really off tonight. I was thinking watts, not amps. Hurr.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    27. Re:Lower efficiency by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      So replacing his bulbs with fluorescents would save the electricity. (it may or may not save costs, depending on the quality of your outlet voltage).

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    28. Re:Lower efficiency by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats for charging the battery faster. The laptop's consumption is almost certainly not equal to that charger.

    29. Re:Lower efficiency by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've measured more than 50W when not charging, and nobody said that laptop chargers should be sized such that they were incapable of charging while the laptop was in use.

  5. About Time by bragr · · Score: 1

    So we've only been waiting for this for over a decade, lets just hope it doesn't go the way of a bunch of the other "universal" standards that never get adopted.

    Also what kind of power bricks are we going to have if they have to handle 240w? I don't really want to carry around a 2lbs brink for my laptop that peaks at 20w of power usage.

    1. Re:About Time by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      It depends on the EU ... the only way this would get off the ground is with legislation on a large market. The only large market which still occasionally passes reasonable consumer legislation (getting worse every day, but something still occasionally slips through) is the EU.

    2. Re:About Time by Arlet · · Score: 1

      A standard connector and voltage, and a choice between a small number of different power levels would solve that.

    3. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know USB can handle up to 1.8A (under the BCS), and yet my phone with ~200mA maximum current in host mode works fine? Just because the standard covers up to 250W doesn't mean every PSU must cover the whole range...

    4. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's if the EU is still around in a few months...

    5. Re:About Time by dwillden · · Score: 1

      You realize that all laptop power supplies out there currently handle 120 to 240w already? That aspect is nothing new. You take your laptop overseas you only need a plug adapter. Not an expensive converter. The main thing this does is standardize the connector into the laptop, and build some circuitry to allow for differing power needs for different devices. But they can all already handle 240 just fine.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    6. Re:About Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you pronounce your V's and W's very oddly, or you've confused Volts with Watts.

    7. Re:About Time by roothog · · Score: 1

      You need to look up the difference between "volt" and "watt".

    8. Re:About Time by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You are confusing volts with watts.

    9. Re:About Time by Skapare · · Score: 1

      And that voltage needs to be one has a major source of batteries available as an auxiliary secondary power source. So make it be 12 volts to match all those car batteries out there. And it will work on my laptop instead of my brother's laptop :-)

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    10. Re:About Time by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > You realize that all laptop power supplies out there currently handle 120 to 240w already?

      I have a Thinkpad T61. It can huff and wheeze with a 65-watt supply, but NEEDS a 95-watt supply in order to charge the battery at normal speed while it's powered up. Otherwise, it will basically tread water, and barely treat the battery like a built-in UPS. I know this for a fact, because it came with the 95-watt supply, but I've been agonizing over Lenovo's new 65-watt PowerHub with built in powered USB hub (damn, why can't they make a 95-watt version of THAT?!?) which is technically compatible, if you can live with having to actually shut down the computer to actually CHARGE the battery.

      Note: this is Lenovo's work of art: http://www.amazon.com/ThinkPad-65W-Adapter-USB-Hub/dp/tech-data/B0044KR91U

      Other manufacturers make laptop power supplies that can supply 5v USB power for charging, but Lenovo's is the only one that's actually a real, honest to god powered USB hub.

    11. Re:About Time by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      12v is nice. You can stack smaller batteries to reach it cleanly, or downconvert by a nice even ration from common mains currents.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:About Time by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Here's some formulas for you, since you're clueless.

      v = ir; i = v/r; r = v/i; p = iv

      Where:
      p is power (watts);
      v is voltage (volts, imagine that);
      i is current (amperes);
      r is resistance (ohms);

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:About Time by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Standardising on 12V for laptops has the issue that sooner or later someone will get the "bright" idea to connect them directly to car electrics. That means you either have to design the devices to stand being connected to car electrics or you have to deal with the returns that result from idiots conecting an unsuitable power supply (and not admitted they did so of course).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:About Time by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Standardising on 12V for laptops has the issue that sooner or later someone will get the "bright" idea to connect them directly to car electrics. That means you either have to design the devices to stand being connected to car electrics or you have to deal with the returns that result from idiots conecting an unsuitable power supply (and not admitted they did so of course).

      What makes a power source "unsuitable"? Why, the design of the object connected to it, of course.

      What makes a car 12V outlet unsuitable for a laptop? Variation of voltage in normal operation might be one thing, but a laptop can be designed to handle it. The sudden loss of power or brownout when starting? Yes, that can be designed around. In fact, a laptop is much better at dealing with this than many other things since a laptop has an internal battery which makes the laptop into a UPS.

      So, if 12V becomes the standard, it would be a foolish laptop manufacturer that didn't take automotive electrical systems into account when designing the new power sections. There are so many reasonable apps for 12V powered computers that I'm actually surprised there aren't more of them already.

      I've seen DC/DC converters specifically intended for such purposes -- 10-15V input, 12V output. It's not hard, and those converters are not magic.

    15. Re:About Time by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      So we've only been waiting for this for over a decade

      Douglas Adams would agree, I can't believe that no one linked to Dongly Things

  6. not 240W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That should read 10W to 130W, and 110V to 240V.

    1. Re:not 240W by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Japanese don't need their voltage to be supported. Oh wait.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  7. Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by SubtleGuest · · Score: 1

    I will begrudgingly admit that the Apple magnetic power connection is vastly superior. But it's the only Apple feature I covet!

    1. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hmm, my 5 year old deep fryer at home has a magnetic attachment for the plug.... Are we certain Apple even has a patent on this?

    2. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      I wish USB had a magnetic connector like that. I myself have had more 9.8 m/sec^2 events involving USB than power connectors, but maybe I'm in the minority.

    3. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by teslafreak · · Score: 1

      They do at least in the US, patent number 7,311,526

    4. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      +magsafe +connector +burn

      And implementations have existed way before Apple, as with all ideas which end up being ascribed to Apple.

    5. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      yeah but think if all the warnings about improperly disconnected hard drives that will show up

    6. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      So... why had no one done it before on a laptop? It seems obvious for a device that moves frequently and is very often plugged and unplugged...

      Not the first, but come on, it's hardly rocket surgery.

    7. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      Because, while I'm sure Apple fanboys will claim it to be the perfect power connector, it has its disadvantages too. Start with the above search. Then there are people complaining that it comes out too easily; others complaining that they've knocked the cable and it's pulled the laptop to the floor with it (false sense of security!).

      I've only ever knocked a portable computer to the floor once. It was Psion Series 3a, in a biology lab, and it wasn't connected to anything. Still works fine decades later. I appreciate that some people are more lackadaisical or clumsy with their hardware, but for those who aren't, a MagSafe connector's disadvantages may outweigh the advantages.

    8. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      A 20 second search reveals, for example, patents 5873737 and 6267602 issued before 2000. "Magnets to help electrically connect stuff" won't be specific enough for a patent, though... as with USB, the trick is in designing a specific plug and then forcing everyone to play by your rules (read: pay your fee) to make compatible products, i.e. products which feature a plug or socket which fits.

      These are, of course, excellent examples of typical abuse of the patent system, as you're not really putting forward any new ideas, just using a specific uninteresting arrangement of pins and sheath to ensure you collect licensing royalties.

    9. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would challenge anyone to show they can pull a mac to the ground via it's Magsafe connector. The magnetic latch pull is very weak, but it won't come out easily unless you tug on it. It's a life saver, especially in a household with young puppies and children.

      The fact that it comes out easily is the point. I've lost quite a few laptops (non-apple) to damaged power ports or even worse, a trip to the floor. Most don't survive such a drop.

    10. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      And implementations have existed way before Apple, as with all ideas which end up being ascribed to Apple.

      "I don't know who started it, I don't give a fuck. The one thing I do know is that we did it harder, we did faster, and we definitely did it with more love. You can't take that away from us." - SLC Punk

      Totally different subject matter but seemed oddly appropriate.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    11. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I will begrudgingly admit that the Apple magnetic power connection is vastly superior. But it's the only Apple feature I covet!

      What about how small the Apple power brick is?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    12. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Take the new MBA-friendly connector and pull it in the direction of the cable connection. You can drag a mac around on some tables. The old connector was harder to do this with, but you could always have caught it under the notebook. I've watched a pre-unibody come out with a huge dent for this very reason.

      Forget friggin' magnets, anyway. Inductive-resonance for the power-standard win. I just want to set the power brick within five feet of my laptop and have it charge inductively.

      Also, my wife hates magsafe, as she'd much rather risk destroying a notebook through a fall than risk having inadvertently pulled the power, slowly killing the battery just before taking the machine on the road. And, yes, we both have/use macs. Personally, I quite like magsafe.

    13. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by chaboud · · Score: 1

      You must have been away from other manufacturers for a while. Sony, Lenovo, etc. bricks are gettin' real small.

      Now, if Apple would avoid having MBP 85W bricks kill Unibody MBs, that would be much appreciated. Fixed in the 13" MBP, but rough for people who say "oh yeah, that connector is the same, so this should work," which, for those wondering, is just about everyone.

      Personally, I want Apple to make a brick that has a natural place for holding *all* of its cables. I'd also be happy with a larger brick that auto-retracts, from, well, anyone.

    14. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I can pull my MBP along via the magsafe cord. The trick is to pull slowly. If you wrap the cable around your shoe and then slowly move away from table, I can imagine you might pull it off by mistake. If it's fast, the connector will disconnect immediately. I've tripped over my power cord loads of times without sending the laptop flying.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    15. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      You must have been away from other manufacturers for a while. Sony, Lenovo, etc. bricks are gettin' real small.

      You are right, it has been a couple of years. So what are the dimensions of these? I'm looking around on Lenovo's site and cannot find the dimensions on the power brick.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    16. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... a PDA is a bit less delicate and complicated than a modern laptop.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Actually that's a very good point. The new connector isn't as safe as the old, and it's rather fiddlier to attach too. Luckily all the third-party knockoff power supplies still use the old one.

    18. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

      The old MacBook Pro used to get really hot near the connect and it would cause the connector, and any USB cables, to melt after awhile. That was the computer though, not the connector's fault.

      Of course it comes out too easily, don't pull your computer, or electronic, around by it's power cable. However, do that with a Leveno style barrel connector and you need a new main board. Ask me know I know...

      As far as false sense of security, I kind of see your point, but at the same time, you can say the same thing about air-bags in cars. The bottom line is the magsafe connector is much safer then a conventional.

      The only real downside I've experienced is that since the internal connectors are spring loaded, and there is a magnet near them, they can over the course of about 4 years, acquire crud and stop making contact.

    19. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      It can be done, but it's much easier when someone is falling in slow motion (rarely happens outside of movies) or if the cable is being pulled very slowly by someone or something. More common would be a sharp tugging motion, which causes the plug to come out. They do indeed come out more easily than a regular plug, but then that is the point. I typically only have that problem if I'm using mine in bed or in a crowded workspace - ideally one in which the objects on my desk are moving of their own accord.

      Here's your post summed up.

      1) Dropping a PDA on the floor is hardly comparable to a Dell Inspiron taking a dive. Glad it works decades later, but you may as well regale us with the tale of the potato you dropped on the floor - mentioning that you were able to wash it and make a nice meal, so therefore an egg dropped in the same way would probably be fine. False sense of security my ass. It's not as if anyone with any sense would decide to dance a jig around their desk simply because they believe their power adapter cable will come out before the frenzied dancing results in an expensive repair bill.

      It's sensationalist to write "but for those who aren't, a MagSafe connector's disadvantages may outweigh the advantages." Yeah, the disadvantages may outweigh the advantages, but then the same is true of the armless baby example and pretty much anything electrical.

      This isn't a fanboy response. There are some pretty good arguments for not using magsafe, but you found none of them. If power adapters can be standardised then certainly thats an argument against using a proprietary connector.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    20. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      It can be done, but it's much easier when someone is falling in slow motion

      Or just moving around with the cord round your leg.

      Dropping a PDA on the floor is hardly comparable to a Dell Inspiron taking a dive.

      Why is a 20 year old PDA still more sturdy than today's average laptop? What are manufacturers doing wrong?

    21. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Or just moving around with the cord round your leg.

      True. Let's add walking in slow motion while having the cord looped around a leg to possible risks. I'll accept that circus clowns and people with wooden legs should be wary - the latter mainly because they'd not likely notice a sensation of a cable being pulled taught around a leg.

      Why is a 20 year old PDA still more sturdy than today's average laptop? What are manufacturers doing wrong?

      Psion made some decent kit, but Etch A Sketch is way sturdier than any Psion PDA. It's also worth noting that there are practically no reports of Etch A Sketch bursting in to flames.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    22. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      they'd not likely notice a sensation of a cable being pulled taught around a leg.

      Thick trousers / boots / expecting resistance under the desk anyway / distracted / less sensation with age / diabetes / wheelchair. Would certainly apply to at least one disabled neighbour I assist from time to time - it's not some wild edge case, rather the sort of thing you have to think about when making sure a work environment is safe.

      For the clumsier type, perhaps the Mac laptop will be dragged to the floor less. But the connector's no catch-all. I even recall articles when it first came out in which people tested it out and found the laptop would be dragged when pulled quite firmly in a certain direction.

      Etch A Sketch is way sturdier than any Psion PDA.

      Probably true in general, though fwiw my EaS stopped drawing properly after a few years. Dunno why. I can't draw anyway :-(.

    23. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      So wait, the "downsides" are problems that regular power connectors also have, except they're much reduced with the magsafe connector...? So I repeat, why hasn't anyone done it before?

      You post was a classic "lolz Apple claims they invented everything!" troll. Also note that no one is claiming the magsafe connector is perfect (you are merely claiming that you believe Apple users claim it is perfect). It certainly has some flaws - you can move the laptop on a slippery surface if you pull very slowly, or at a particular angle. It has an issue with spring tension on some of the pins if they become weak or stuck. It has an issue with self-cleaning since the contacts don't slide over each other when the connection is made and broken you can get surface build up that reduces the effectiveness of the connection.

      Catching fire though.. well, not really any different to any other laptop power cord if the cable is frayed. Obviously an issue to address (is it user abuse? design flaw? cord and strain relief too weak for a part that is expected to receive heavy use? etc) and Apple has changed the design in response to that.

      And, to add to your anecdote, my powerbook (G4 15") fell from my grasp at an airport long ago and landed on the rear corner onto a concrete floor (on the opposite side to the DC board) and got bent up a treat. Still works perfectly to this day, years and years later. Runs Ubuntu now.

    24. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      The milled aluminum cases are pretty nice, too. As are the oversized touch pads. In fact, there are lots of things apple does that I wish their competitors would imitate. But instead, they imitate the trivial crap, like the "black keys on grey" and ignore the important stuff like "don't make a case that will off-gas the plasticizers in six months and crack on all the hinges."

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    25. Re:Ok, the connector is pretty nice... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      So wait, the "downsides" are problems that regular power connectors also have, except they're much reduced with the magsafe connector...?

      The fire hazard thing is much reduced? The accidentally coming disconnected is much reduced?

      You post was a classic "lolz Apple claims they invented everything!" troll.

      It distorts people's understanding of development of tech if one company with an excellent marketing machine misleads others. This in turn stifles progress. See my other post:

      A 20 second search reveals, for example, patents 5873737 and 6267602 issued before 2000. "Magnets to help electrically connect stuff" won't be specific enough for a patent, though... as with USB, the trick is in designing a specific plug and then forcing everyone to play by your rules (read: pay your fee) to make compatible products, i.e. products which feature a plug or socket which fits.

      In terms of application, the design has existed in the US for deep fat fryers since at least 2001.

      So I repeat, why hasn't anyone done it before?

      Well, I'm not in the mind of every single laptop manufacturer, but like I already said, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. It's a good idea when knocking the device to the floor is likely to cause horrible burns or a fire, but it's not worth it with a laptop. (And I'm constantly surprised by how many Apple laptop users talk about the Magsafe feature saving their laptop - does the modern Apple user treat his machines especially badly or is it just making up a story to prove a point?)

      And, to add to your anecdote, my powerbook (G4 15") fell from my grasp at an airport long ago and landed on the rear corner onto a concrete floor (on the opposite side to the DC board) and got bent up a treat. Still works perfectly to this day, years and years later. Runs Ubuntu now.

      Yeah, the old Apple laptops were fairly well built. I have a Wallstreet G3 with smashed plastic in the corner after some idiot decided to send it in the regular post with hardly any protection - works fine!

  8. A side note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is almost no way Apple could have a patent on a magnetically coupled charging cable. This technology is nothing new, and it isn't limited purely to the realm of computer power supplies. I have a fryer that has this safety feature....but....now that I think about it....the device is stark white with few buttons....

    1. Re:A side note by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      There can be only one!

      (and NO fans)

    2. Re:A side note by bragr · · Score: 1

      They were awarded the patent. Sure there may be prior artwork which would void that patent, but do you have legal resources to fight Apple's lawyers long enough to actually point that out to a judge?

    3. Re:A side note by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      They have a patent on their implementation of the idea. The idea itself is not patented.

    4. Re:A side note by bragr · · Score: 0

      OK, you design something similar without using magnets.

    5. Re:A side note by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Sophistry.

    6. Re:A side note by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood. Apple has a patent on their particular arrangement of magnets, shielding, and transmission pins. They do not have a universal patent on magnetic-secured power couplings.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    7. Re:A side note by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the point. The idea of using magnets to secure a power connector is not new or patented. So you are free to do so. You just can't make it look like (or interoperate with) the Magsafe connector.

      Personally, I'd probably make it circular with an inner and outer ring for the hot and ground connections. That way the contacts would naturally slide a little during normal use and help with keeping the metal surface dirt and grease free, for better conductivity.

      I'd put the magnet into a small hemispherical dome in the centre, and set back the main metallic part in the socket to weaken the attraction very quickly unless the thing was mated flush, to help eliminate the "my laptop is on a shiny slippery surface and somehow the cord wrapped around my leg without me realising and now I'm going to get up and walk away really slowly" failure mode, where it would be possible to make the laptop fall.

      You think this is a crazy setup, but that's seriously a suggested legitimate downside for why the magsafe connector can't be relied on to "save" your laptop from falling, and that you'll get complacent, from slashdot users in this discussion. Best to design out those "29.5 on the Richter scale earthquake" scenarios.

    8. Re:A side note by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It can't be fallacious if it's an actual fact. Go and check it.

      It's a shame that reality has a bias towards facts, but there it is.

    9. Re:A side note by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The conceptual statement that an idea can not be an implementation is just that, a conceptual statement ... not a fact.

      It's also a fact that I think it's just a bit of sophistry thought up by lawyers ... they do like to redefine words into nonsense, just like they are perpetually trying with the word "obvious".

  9. There oughta be a standard! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    Also, that standard should license proprietary designs from a single company with money I conjure from thin air.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  10. Why stop at power supplies? by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    How about ink cartdridges? Laptop batteries? etc.

    The answer is the same - money. Those darned evil companies actually enjoy it when you buy their products, over and over again.

    1. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      How about ink cartdridges? Laptop batteries? etc.

      The answer is the same - money. Those darned evil companies actually enjoy it when you buy their products, over and over again.

      There's a real reason why inkjet cartridges differ among manufacturers -- many have the printhead built-in, and printhead is one of the differentiators that distinguish quality (and price) among manufacturers. Even for those that don't include the printhead, the manufacturer tailors the ink for their own printhead and ink delivery system. However, what should be against the law is chipping the inkject cartridge to prevent 3rd party replacements from working - if someone is willing to risk leaks or poorer quality with a 3rd party cartridge, they should be allowed to.

      The laptop batter is integrally molded to fit within your laptop. The cells within the plastic are already industry standard cells that you can buy on the open market.

      However, it's harder for a manufacturer to argue that they need a custom power adapter if there were an industry standard multi-voltage adapter available. After all, 100W at 17V is the same no matter who makes the adapter. There can be an industry certification process for voltage drop at high currents, ripple, etc, so the manufacturer can say that only "certified" adapters may be used.

    2. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Ink cartridges and batteries have a much more reasonable justification for not being standard. Unlike the power lead which delivers the same thing in slightly different amperages and voltages, batteries and ink cartridges have other considerations which need to be made. For one thing, there isn't just one type of battery on the market, even as far as lithium based ones go, there's quite a few, and they have chips in them to determine how much to charge and track the health of the battery.

      Or have you forgotten about those batteries which exploded because they were poorly manufactured? The same thing can happen if you don't use the appropriate power to charge them.

    3. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      However, what should be against the law ...

      Why should we allow the government to run our lives when corporations have proven they are quite capable of doing so?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      If that was what this standard was about I might be in favor of it. Instead it involves a whole lot of handshaking between the power supply and the device connected to it which is going to require a lot more than two power connection pins. So we have a four, five or more pin connector that is mandated to be on every device and probably quite fragile. Very, very customized because it has two heavy-duty power pins and the rest can be wimpy data connections. And every power supply now needs to have a custom chip with a processor that can negotiate the power voltage and current with the device. The device needs a custom chip as well.

      Do you see the costs going up and up here? And the reliability going down and down?

    5. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The Apple Magsafe connector that many people here seem to be enamored with has 5 pins, and most of the complaints about fragility seem to be talking about the fragility of the power cord, not the connector itself. Besides, you don't *have* to have more than 2 pins... I don't know how negotiation works with this new standard, but for example, the power supply could supply 3V by default, then that device uses that 3V to power its negotiator and sends appropriate signals over the 2 power supply pins to request its desired voltage. After that, there doesn't need to be any more negotiation over the power pins. (though there could be further communication - the power adapter could say "Hey, my power source is a battery and it's running low, so I'd like you to drop down from 100W of power to 50W, ok?")

      If all computers used the new standard, then the price of the power supply negotiation chipset would come down to be negligible, especially compared to the price of a laptop. The new standard would be used for many other things too -- like speakers, external hard drives, etc (i.e. anything that uses too much power to be powered from a USB port).

      USB and Bluetooth implementations are much more involved than a simple voltage negotiation, yet you can buy a USB->Bluetooth adapter for 99 cents:

      http://www.meritline.com/bluetooth-usb20-adapter---p-40150.aspx

    6. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      And have you forgotten about how we got along just fine with AAA, AA, C, D, and 9 volt batteries for many, many years, and manufacturers just had to design their products around the batteries that were available?

      The reason there's no "one type of battery on the market," in regards to PCs and other devices with proprietary batteries, is that it's too lucrative to sell your own proprietary batteries. Same with $50 charging cables and other such bullshit. If a standards body came out and said, "here are 10 different form factors and specifications for rechargable batteries," and manufacturers actually *used* them, we'd actually see competition and cheaper battery prices.

      And no, we haven't forgotten about the exploding batteries from Sony. How does that bolster your point? They were proprietary batteries not made to any standard.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    7. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      USB and Bluetooth implementations are much more involved than a simple voltage negotiation, yet you can buy a USB->Bluetooth adapter for 99 cent

      I would hazard a guess that the bluetooth stack is running on the processor. It will not be a software defined radio, but the bluetooth chip in these cheap devices is very whimsy. The PC must do all the handshaking and encoding.
      Voltage negotiation is irrelevant in this case. Bluetooth itself is wireless so it has none, and if you simply use or design a ttl compatible chip it will work perfectly off the 5V from USB without negotiation.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    8. Re:Why stop at power supplies? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      USB and Bluetooth implementations are much more involved than a simple voltage negotiation, yet you can buy a USB->Bluetooth adapter for 99 cent

      I would hazard a guess that the bluetooth stack is running on the processor. It will not be a software defined radio, but the bluetooth chip in these cheap devices is very whimsy. The PC must do all the handshaking and encoding.
        Voltage negotiation is irrelevant in this case. Bluetooth itself is wireless so it has none, and if you simply use or design a ttl compatible chip it will work perfectly off the 5V from USB without negotiation.

      I wasn't implying that this does any sort of voltage negotiating, I was using it of an example of how far mass production can drive down prices - you get an entire USB client controller and some portion of a Bluetooth device for 99 cents, so it's not inconceivable that the much simpler voltage negotiation controller would cost less (at least on the laptop side. The power supply electronics might cost more since it needs to do voltage selection and switch relatively large currents).

  11. Magnetic connector with strain relief by navyjeff · · Score: 1

    The magnetic connection would be nice, but only if they also specify proper cable strain relief. I've had a couple of those Apple power supply cables break open at that point.

    1. Re:Magnetic connector with strain relief by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      If you got one in the last month or two, you'll notice that the cable connects in a different spot now, so it's far less susceptible to breaking off. Even before, it was much less troublesome than having the whole barrel connector snap off inside your Dell! Nothing like the nervous feeling of soldering on a laptop.

    2. Re:Magnetic connector with strain relief by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      They did change it - it was still a weakness in the design, which was worse before when it was a physical plug. The new ones are much better.

    3. Re:Magnetic connector with strain relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those pogo-pin shitbox magnetic power connectors are garbage.
      The pins stick, the contacts get dirty, they parts overheat due to resistance, and eventually fail.
      Happened to me, happened to a friend's machine.

    4. Re:Magnetic connector with strain relief by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Indeed both my laptops needed the power connector resoldering.

      I've also seen not one, not two, but three power supply cables fail at a strain relief point.
      Two of them with large sparks that could have caused a fire if they'd been resting near the wrong surface.

  12. Apple MagSafe problems well-known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While the idea of using an Apple-like magnetic connector is cool, there are a lot of issues:

    (1) Some of us do work where having strong magnets laying around on a desk is a bad idea. (2) The Apple MagSafe adapters have been highly unreliable, and Apple won't license to third-parties, so you're stuck buying another Apple adapter which will then fail. (3) There can be reports of metal fragments and other magnetic particles sticking to the plug and causing problems.

    1. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      While the idea of using an Apple-like magnetic connector is cool, there are a lot of issues:

      (1) Some of us do work where having strong magnets laying around on a desk is a bad idea. (2) The Apple MagSafe adapters have been highly unreliable, and Apple won't license to third-parties, so you're stuck buying another Apple adapter which will then fail. (3) There can be reports of metal fragments and other magnetic particles sticking to the plug and causing problems.

      Citation needed.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by imamac · · Score: 1

      Highly unreliable? I think not. I have had 4 MacBooks since they started the magnetic power adapter and have not had any reliability issues. I have also never had any metal fragments stuck to the connector. Maybe we shouldn't keep metal shards on your desk? Your first point and the last half of point 2 does have merit, however.

    3. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by hawguy · · Score: 1

      While the idea of using an Apple-like magnetic connector is cool, there are a lot of issues:

      (1) Some of us do work where having strong magnets laying around on a desk is a bad idea. (2) The Apple MagSafe adapters have been highly unreliable, and Apple won't license to third-parties, so you're stuck buying another Apple adapter which will then fail. (3) There can be reports of metal fragments and other magnetic particles sticking to the plug and causing problems.

      Citation needed.

      #1 - compass calibrators

      #2 - http://www.zdnet.com/blog/mobile-gadgeteer/apple-magsafe-failure-prevents-work-from-getting-done/276

      #3 - http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/BE052647/huge-magnet-picking-up-scrap-metal/?ext=1

    4. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      1) it's not a strong magnet - that's the point of the design
      2) [citation needed]
      3) this is a potential problem - you need to check the plug for any magnetic "debris"

    5. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The metal fragment bit does seem annoying ... how about using negative air pressure instead? Or is that patent barred as well?

    6. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's never used one. Call me a fanboy if you like, but the magsafe adapter is *far* better than anything else I've seen.

      (1) "Strong magnets": my Macbook Pro has *lots* of strong magnets in it: two to close the lid latch, another one to activate the lid position sensor. Adding another one makes no difference.
      (2) "Highly unreliable": My previous Macbook Pro was the last of the "ordinary power plug" generation. In three years of ownership, I repaired and/or replaced the power supply plug at least four times. On one occasion the power cord actually started melting and smoking at the power socket's strain relief. As for the laptop itself, the power socket got so much abuse that the titanium (!) case was bent and twisted next to the socket. My current Magsafe-equipped Macbook Pro has lasted four years, and has never once had a problem with the power cord or socket.
      (3) "Small pieces of metal": The socket's pretty carefully designed with an inset magnet and projecting power contacts, so while metal fragments will on rare occasions get in and stick to the magnet, it's very hard for them to bridge the contacts. But honestly, in four years the only stuff that's gotten stuck in my Magsafe socket is lint, bits of paper, and the occasional grain of sand -- stuff you could find in any power jack.

    7. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who's never used one. Call me a fanboy if you like,

      Spoken like a fanboy. The article is for a generic laptop connector; most laptops do NOT use magnets for closing the lid or the lid position sensor. Generalizing the extremely small share of Mac to the world is a common sign of fanboydom...

      I've never had a power supply cord fail for any laptop I've owned. In 19 years, never had a Gateway, Dell, Toshiba, or my current HP have a problem with the power connector. Never broke, and certainly never melted or smoked as you experienced with your Apple unit!

      And the attraction of metal shavings is a real and distinct concern. Foreign debris in any connector is a concern; adding attractors to the connector simply enhances that concern.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      You must not do much with your laptops.

      When I worked in industrial automation a damaged beyond repair power connection killed more than any other cause, and I went through a laptop every 3 months or so. IBM Thinkpads had maybe the second best connector from a durability standpoint but if something hit the cord it would sling the laptop across the room.

      I've since used an MBP in similarly tough environments and have yet to kill it.

      Do your Apple magsafe connectors attract a lot of metal shavings?

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    9. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      I travel with my laptop - current one has over 200,000 documented miles on it. That includes travel all over the world (5 continents with this one so far), nearly every day to different client's offices, in labs, conference rooms, dance clubs (I work in acoustics and audio development, and many of my clients are prosound companies), studios, theaters, etc. I guess I just take care of my stuff a bit better that many...

      .
      My previous laptop was a Dell Latitude D505, and it racked up close to 500,000 miles. Finally died when someone stepped on it (dumb roommate) and cracked the motherboard right under the charging control circuit. Battery lasted long enough to do a final backup of everything. It had been on all 7 continents and in the back of countless rental cars, desks/beds/tables, etc.

      As far as metal shavings, the Macbook I have has attracted metal shavings before, and I check it religiously when I do take it into the field (it's more of an office-desk-queen). Lots of metal shavings around in speaker factories, what with the lathing of poles and yokes and all. Plenty of low-carbon metal shavings to get stuck in there.

      Neither my previous Dell, or my current HP has had any big issues with the environments I go. Including one I'm dreading next week, Ningbo Strong Magnet in Ningbo China. It'll be around 44 deg C and 85% humidity on the factory floor, with bursts up to 50 deg C when the kilns are opened. Not good for laptops (or me), but they soldier on without a problem. Just an occasional blowing clean with compressed air (keyboard and fan ports). They just keep going...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:Apple MagSafe problems well-known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) Proof or STFU.

  13. What about batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The oughta be standardized battieries, too.

  14. But how will companies survive? by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

    All of a sudden, you don't have to pay 80$ to replace their power cord, or purchase a new laptop since it's not worth buying the power cord. That idea is as crazy as...5 cent lithium watch batters not costing 4.99 each. Wishful thinking.

  15. Power over ethernet! by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

    POE should be the standard... and that will stop those sneaky bastards from obsoleting ethernet jacks from our new fancy tablets and notebook PCs.

    1. Re:Power over ethernet! by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Even better is power over wifi!

    2. Re:Power over ethernet! by tom17 · · Score: 1

      POW!

    3. Re:Power over ethernet! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Do not want, the standard network jack was not designed to have the cable constantly being plugged and unplugged. When it comes to my laptops, I tend not to use the network jack very often, but the power cord has to be used at least once every several hours of computing.

      If we want to move to a POE standard, the jack would have to be a lot more durable than what it presently is.

    4. Re:Power over ethernet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAM*!

      * Battery Amplified Magnets**

      ** that joke sucked

    5. Re:Power over ethernet! by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      compared to USB the RJ45 connector isn't sooo bad.

      according to the USB 3 specs the standard connector has to survive at least 1500 cycles, this presentation shows no problems with RJ45/PoE for at least 800 connection cycles (no idea if min. cycles are part of any RJ spec).

    6. Re:Power over ethernet! by dublin · · Score: 1

      Power over Ethernet is DEFINITELY the way this should go. For one thing, PoE and the PoE standard just works, and has now been tested, standardized, extended to higher power ranges (802.3af up to 12W, 802.3at to 25W (50W w/all wires), and is extremely interoperable across devices and manufacturers.

      PoE is smart - The PSE (power supplying equipment) and PD (powered device) have to sync (mostly passively, it's clever) to determine power required and the presence of a PD before any power is delivered.

      PoE also has the advantage of being the first non-trivial worldwide power interface (yep, I'm considering USB as trivial, for lots of reasons...), and its standardization on 48VDC means there are already zillions of telco and industrial devices (including all modern VoIP phones) that can easily interoperate with it, or be easily modified to use it.

      If only the automotive guys hadn't had their heads up an locked before standardizing on 42VDC next-gen automotive electrical systems... (I can't wait for $500 batteries!)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  16. Bulkier devices, less battery life by RedACE7500 · · Score: 1

    The reason for custom batteries is often to make them fit within the available space of a device while minimizing dead space. Apple has even gone so far as to mold their gel batteries inside the case. By making them non-removable they 1) save space by not needing a hard-plastic case to protect the cells, 2) minimize dead space by being able to shape the battery as needed and 3) can get longer battery life by being able to fit their custom-shaped batteries into a larger percentage of the device. I'm not an Apple fan-boy, but I thought this was pretty cool.

    1. Re:Bulkier devices, less battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The OP isn't talking about the batteries. We're talking about the power supply to the computer.

    2. Re:Bulkier devices, less battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about power supplies, not batteries.

  17. or... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1, Informative

    If there's one thing I wish for all laptop power supplies, it's that they would license from Apple (or work around, patent-wise) the magnet attachment system that makes cable--tripping far less dangerous to man or beast,

    Or you could, you know, not put your power cable in an area that people walk through...

    1. Re:or... by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, not put your power cable in an area that people walk through...

      One of my first jobs would have been way easier if someone had invented the magsafe connector. The company I worked for had laptops on carts for the nurses to be able to chart meds and other things automagically next to the patient bed. (Scan patient, scan drugs, give patient drugs, record updated with what, how much, and when.) We had ~10-12 instances of electricians being called to remove one prong of the plug from the wall socket because the nurses just walked off with the cart without unplugging the laptop first. This was in the mid-to-late 90s, and replacement plugs from toshiba were expensive. Like $75/ea.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    2. Re:or... by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. I too enjoy redesigning workspaces to meet the design limitations of gadgets.

    3. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe architects, contractors and interior designers could re-design whole fucking buildings around where we'll be placing our furniture and using our laptops.

    4. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could, you know, not put your power cable in an area that people walk through...

      One of my first jobs would have been way easier if someone had invented the magsafe connector. The company I worked for had laptops on carts for the nurses to be able to chart meds and other things automatically next to the patient bed. (Scan patient, scan drugs, give patient drugs, record updated with what, how much, and when.) We had ~10-12 instances of electricians being called to remove one prong of the plug from the wall socket because the nurses just walked off with the cart without unplugging the laptop first. This was in the mid-to-late 90s, and replacement plugs from toshiba were expensive. Like $75/ea.

      ftfy

    5. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they must have been poorly designed in the first place, so redesigning them wont hurt

    6. Re:or... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Workspace have been designed around not tripping over cables since electric equipment first became common around fifty years ago with the introduction of the electric calculator and the electric typewriter. Not to mention the rise of the desktop computer over the last quarter century.
       
      So if you're just now 'redesigning" your workspace to account for cables... it's not the "gadgets" that are at fault.

    7. Re:or... by men0s · · Score: 1

      So YOU'RE the one wearing the black hat in all those xkcd comics. http://xkcd.com/908/

    8. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called common sense.
      The MagSafe wasn't created because of irate dogs, children, or people that wanted to plug their computer in on the other side of a walk lane... it was created to allow simple idiot-proof insertion so you could do it blindfolded pretty much.

    9. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kind of statement only works if the entire world existed in some kind of structured, pseudo-reality. It's easy to say something like, "...put your power cable..." in a certain way when you're sitting in your basement with your laptop sitting on a table with a nice 5" space between it and optimally placed close to a wall outlet. But that limited view of reality doesn't apply in most situations.

    10. Re:or... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, not put your power cable in an area that people walk through...

      Like, you know, connected to a computer on your lap.

    11. Re:or... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Some people use their laptops at home. With kids. They could have the power cords up on the ceiling and the kids would still trip over them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    12. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Because cables to a mobile device are so easy to keep out of the way without increasing the fucking bother of picking up your cables. So.. you know.. you can take advantage of the mobility in a mobile device.

      Or maybe you're just rolling in cash and you can afford to keep a new power brick in your laptop bag at all times. So whenever you go somewhere you haven't been before, you just bust out the new brick and leave it there just in case you come back.

    13. Re:or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A comment like this is funny in that the poster thinks they are saying something that shows their separate and unequaled intelligence while what they're actually showing is a deep ignorance of reality. And by funny I mean ' makes me laugh at the idiot'.

    14. Re:or... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      I have all my walls, floors and ceilings covered with power outlets, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  18. Connectors by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    If there's one thing I wish for all laptop power supplies, it's that they would license from Apple (or work around, patent-wise) the magnet attachment system that makes cable--tripping far less dangerous to man or beast, compared to a few years ago.

    Also just wear and tear on the connector. I've seen laptops become unusable just because the power socket is stupidly designed and ends up getting loose. Even some sort of less-patented snap design or something would be better. Van der Waals force, I dunno. Hell, even just something that isn't a cylinder that goes over a small bendable pin, maybe something totally solid like the Apple one only it goes in further, that would be nice...

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
    1. Re:Connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen this "Magnetic power cord disconnects" in Japanese Electric Thermal Hot Pot for a long time, wondering if it is considered prior art.
      e.g. http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-NC-EH22PC-Quart-Electric-Thermal/dp/B0013O8J6Y/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1308854043&sr=8-6

  19. While they are at it ... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Please also standardize Batteries for these devices. Either that or I'd like them to have the ability to update the cells inside easily (non sealed)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:While they are at it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine that is a much bigger challenge, as it would require standardizing the layout of a laptops interior (i.e. long and skinny battery or short and fat ).

    2. Re:While they are at it ... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      We do have a few standards for batteries today (D, C, AA, AAA, N, etc), so I guess a few regular sizes for portable devices would probably be needed ("PB1" for an iPad, two or three "PB3" for a MacBook, etc).

    3. Re:While they are at it ... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, they could standardize a set of, say, 5 shapes.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:While they are at it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duracell and Intel tried to standardize laptop batteries in the early 90's. A few of the 2nd & 3rd tier factories used them, but none of the major players. The problem is that the battery is a descent amount of the size/weight of a laptop. Having a fixed size/configuration limited manufacturers in designing the laptop and also prevented them from differentiating their products with different battery offerings.

      Li-Ion batteries will always be sealed into packs for safety reasons. One of the things that make li-Ion a good battery is that it is unstable. Even a small error in rebuilding a battery like connect a wire wrong, having a poor connection between cells, or dropping a cell while installing and your battery can turn into a firebomb just like in the videos that you see on you tube.

  20. MagSafe by pz · · Score: 1

    If there's one thing I wish for all laptop power supplies, it's that they would license from Apple (or work around, patent-wise) the magnet attachment system that makes cable--tripping far less dangerous to man or beast, compared to a few years ago.

    The connector is called MagSafe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MagSafe).

    As someone with an EE background, what I've not understood with their design is how they compensate for a lack of wiping action on the contacts. Reliable contacts require wiping between the two surfaces to ensure low resistance; non-wiping contacts have inherently shorter lifetime. Exposed, non-wiping contacts would be expected to fail quite quickly.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:MagSafe by jdastrup · · Score: 1

      That's why you should always wipe.

    2. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cotton swabs, push twist, works like a charm......but then again, never had to clean an Apple Magsafe connector/charger. :-)

    3. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reliable contacts require wiping between the two surfaces to ensure low resistance; non-wiping contacts have inherently shorter lifetime. Exposed, non-wiping contacts would be expected to fail quite quickly.

      So you have to buy an iSupply 2.0, of course!

    4. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those connectors actually move around a fair bit, probably enough to scrub some oxidation anyway. The one on my first MacBook used to get the contacts stuck a bit, required a finger to push them in to loosen them up. The new(ish) MacBook doesn't seem to have that problem. Better yet, they fixed the cable side head and gave it a strain relief.

    5. Re:MagSafe by zlogic · · Score: 1

      This looks pretty close to [Sony]Ericcson's chargers. The connector can be only removed from a tilted position and tilting wipes the contacts. I guess magsafe works on the same principle. Or possibly the spring loaded contacts can move sideways when centering.

      I always thought that wiping is bad for electronics - the concacts are constantly scratched along the same path and can be completely worn out. If you look at an old or heavily used USB or memory card, the contacts are a mess.

    6. Re:MagSafe by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      As someone with an EE background, what I've not understood with their design is how they compensate for a lack of wiping action on the contacts. Reliable contacts require wiping between the two surfaces to ensure low resistance; non-wiping contacts have inherently shorter lifetime. Exposed, non-wiping contacts would be expected to fail quite quickly.

      Sums it up nicely. Getting round problems like this requires great design. It's complicated, requires effort, and is worth paying for.

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    7. Re:MagSafe by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      I think it's a combination of two things:
      1) the contacts look like they're gold-plated. Gold may be corrosion-resistant enough to not need wiping.
      2) It's a low voltage circuit, so arcing is less of a problem than with powerline AC contacts.

    8. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple magic.

    9. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure, but from having just looked at mine, it appears the contacts are not flat surfaces. The contacts on the plug are short, round-ended posts, while the contacts on the laptop are rounded depressions. The motion to remove the plug is to tip it toward one side or another, not to pull it straight out. I imagine that could cause some motion between contacts other than separation. In any case, the contacts still seem bright and shiny on their ends.

    10. Re:MagSafe by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It's a Mac - you're not supposed to keep it more than a year or two, so oxidation and failure of connectors isn't an issue - for the first owner...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re:MagSafe by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      according to coward they have a short life span and apple won't licence it to third party so you have your explanation right there

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    12. Re:MagSafe by Stele · · Score: 1

      As someone with an EE background, what I've not understood with their design is how they compensate for a lack of wiping action on the contacts.

      I occasionally stick my power cords into a plate of Indian food. There's plenty of wiping action after that.

    13. Re:MagSafe by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      i think apple uses non-oxidizing contacts (lightly gold plated) but also the contact blades inside the connector have a small spring-loaded mechanism on them so they technically do wipe, but the travel distance is much shorter (around a millimeter or so)

      also, i found this:
      http://www.instructables.com/id/MagSafe-for-the-Rest-of-Us-A-DIY-Magnetic-Power-A/
      a guide to making your own MagSafe adapter at home :)

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    14. Re:MagSafe by pz · · Score: 1

      Even with gold-plated contacts, you still need wiping action to displace crud. There probably isn't any wiping *inside* the power cord connector since the pins are just spring loaded; the important part that should be wiping is between the two connectors, at the visible contacts. As far as I can tell, there is no wiping action there, although I could imagine with very clever design the spring mechanism on the pins might rotate or, better, laterally displace them as they get compressed, which would serve as a wiping action.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    15. Re:MagSafe by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      Try pulling a macbook plug straight out - it's hard, takes a lot of force. Most people will bend it up or down to remove it. This would allow the conacts to rub against each other each time it's removed which may enable a wipe.

    16. Re:MagSafe by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I assume you're joking, but I've had my MagSafe-equiped Macbook since 2006, with the original power brick, still runs fine. Not every Apple user buys the latest shiny every two years.

    17. Re:MagSafe by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Half-joking; Apple really lives on churn now, and it's seen with the fact they're really no longer a computer company. They make mobile entertainment devices predominantly, and have a small group who makes computers as well. For the last several years Apple has made considerably more money with iPods, phones, and music sales than they do with computers. Churn is now the corporate approach, get customers to buy new every year or two. Dinosaurs like you (and me - 2007 Macbook here as one of my dev platforms) aren't the desired market anymore...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re:MagSafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The connection between the thin, light wire and the relatively large connector will fail long before the contacts have problems.

      I have been selling AC adapter for nearly 20 years and the wires and the connection between the connector and wire is the number one failure point. If they make the wires, connectors, and strain reliefs actually strong enough not to fail they will be too big/heavy to be practical.

    19. Re:MagSafe by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      It can be argued Apple learned its lesson--the majority of people don't *want* machines that last forever. They need an excuse to buy an upgraded replacement. To their credit Apple gear still typically lasts longer than their competitors, but obsolescence takes the form of missing features in major software upgrades, and occasionally slowing down older models with them (e.g. iOS4 on iPhone 3G--no new features there except folders really, not even multitasking... but it made it so slow it's almost unusable).

      Apple competitors, working the price angle, typically don't last as long on the hardware side. Personally, I'd rather my hardware last longer even if the gear is obsoleted in software--at least it's still *working* if I choose not to update it...

  21. Internal PSUs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to the days of old when some laptops came with built in power supplies and you just needed an AC cable? I liked those.

    1. Re:Internal PSUs by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      What happened to the days of old when some laptops came with built in power supplies and you just needed an AC cable? I liked those.

      Laptops got smaller.

    2. Re:Internal PSUs by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Laptops got too small.

      I do like the fact that the power supply of the unibody Mac mini is built-in, it takes a standard power cable.

  22. Try mobile phones, portable game consoles, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would really appreciate it if ALL portable devices could standardize on a charger cable. USB has 3 or 4 cable types, can't we have something similar for these other devices? Nintendo can't even come up with a charger cable for their portable systems that works across all of them, and it's their own devices.

  23. Believe it when I see it by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to have a standard it's another thing to have companies actually use the standard! Look at USB power for phones, pretty much all modern phones can connect to a USB port and get power there and many even have USB plugs now but many (looking at you Apple) however still choose to force people to use their of proprietary connector. It's in many companies interest because they think they can make a buck from it.

    1. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty soon even the iPhone will have the standard micro-usb connector. The EU is making all the cell phone companies standardize, because they actually believe in consumer protections.

    2. Re:Believe it when I see it by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      many even have USB plugs now but many (looking at you Apple) however still choose to force people to use their of proprietary connector.

      Apple uses USB also. I don't really care as much what the connector to the phone looks like as long as I don't have to have some proprietary thing to attach to power...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity that MicroUSB connections are absolute garbage. They're typically surface-mounted, and the clips in the connector put a lot of force on the socket. This means that the socket will come straight off the mainboard of the phone, rendering it useless once the battery is flat.

      Apple's design is superior, you can insert it and remove it quite easily in the current version of the cable (earlier versions and some third-party cables have clips), and it takes a lot more abuse.

      MicroUSB was better as well, at least then the socket was a through-hole component.

    4. Re:Believe it when I see it by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

      I had heard this but wasn't sure if/when it was really happening. Go EU!

    5. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of modern phones may use USB, but some phones will only use the USB power cord that came with it. My old Motorola RAZR (which, admittedly, isn't a modern phone any more) used a USB charger, but when I tried to charge it with a standard USB cord instead of Motorola's proprietary cord, it always gave me a message about a nonstandard adaptor and refused to charge.

      Thank God I finally got a new phone.

    6. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's sucks micro-usb is inferior to the current apple connector. USB can only carry USB. The apple connector can carry, USB, Audio, Video, analog controls for things like volume, play, pause, etc...

    7. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you don't care. You're an Apple fanboi.

    8. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the loophole is that you are compliant if you can enable micro usb via an adapter cable. All Apple needs to do is offer a docking cable with a female micro usb end and they're in the clear. Don't think there is any plan to add a usb port to the iPhone itself.

    9. Re:Believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you're talking about. Micro-usb is superior just because it's not propriety Apple garbage.

  24. Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this were software, people would write:

    "You're the same kind of person that railed against the circular saw in the first place, I bet. Normal saws were plenty good enough and inventing new things was pointless, eh?

    Tools change all the time for ALL professions and crafts. It just so happens that programming is new and as such hasn't been solidified yet.

    Feel free not to use anything we make. It won't hurt our feelings."

    Oh wait, they do. Confusion and customization in hardware = bad, re-inventing the wheel every day in software = good. I see. Just another example of the arrogant hypocrisy of the spoiled software brats.

  25. Sure by lennier1 · · Score: 1

    It worked for headphones back in the day. Three different sizes, depending on the type of device.(2.5mm, 3.5mm, 6.36mm).

    Most companies already have an internal system like that anyway, where you have one size for normal laptops and a smaller one for low-power devices like netbooks.

  26. magsafe fuckers by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really liked the MagSafe(tm) concept when Apple first came out with it, but Apple has been such a fucking prick about the damned things. They don't offer any significant range of options to use the plug, and they actively stymie all attempts of the marketplace to fill that void. Want a piggy-back battery to supply power to the laptop? Apple doesn't make one. Want to tie in with a docking station? Apple doesn't make one. At first, when asked about third party adoption of the plugs, they were "oh, well, I guess they'll start coming out any time now." Then it was "oh, well, guess nobody's trying to license them." Then when manufacturers tried to license them, they were refused. So one manufacturer decided to eat the waste and rely on the doctrine of First Sale. They BOUGHT Apple(tm) adapters, chopped off the white wallwart transformer, and soldered the MagSafe(tm) pigtail to their own battery packs, and they were still attacked by Apple's lawyers. WTF, Apple. People have varying needs to make use of your products. Step up to offer the solution, or get out of the way.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:magsafe fuckers by roothog · · Score: 0

      People have varying needs to make use of your products. Step up to offer the solution, or get out of the way.

      You will use your computer the way Apple wants you to use your computer.

    2. Re:magsafe fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up.

    3. Re:magsafe fuckers by devent · · Score: 1

      You just summed up what's wrong with copyrights and software and drug patents (and normal patents but to a lesser extent).

      "People have varying needs to make use of your products. Step up to offer the solution, or get out of the way."

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    4. Re:magsafe fuckers by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      WTF, Apple. People have varying needs to make use of your products. Step up to offer the solution, or get out of the way.

      "You're using is wrong" - Steve Jobs

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re:magsafe fuckers by Twinbee · · Score: 0

      Strange, I didn't see the irony tag in your post.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:magsafe fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is CLEARLY not the Apple philosophy. It's been "Do it our way" for years. If you insist on supporting them financially by buying their products when you should be well aware that this is the case, I have no pity if you get burned. If you want flexibility, don't buy Apple. Ever.

    7. Re:magsafe fuckers by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the IP issues I find the magsafe on my macbook to be a real pain in the ass when I'm reading in bed. It sticks out on the left, but I sleep on the right side of the bed. So I have this wire running accross me, which isn't a big deal, but the magsafe magnet is so incredibly weak and movement sets it off and its constantly getting unplugged.

      I'd love to see a standard, but lets step away from Apple's designs. They're more for show than for use. There's a million safe-break designs. Magsafe is just one and its owned by an IP fascist. How about we standardize on one that a cat walking across on doesn't unplug it?

    8. Re:magsafe fuckers by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

      I agree with what your saying. The company that was buying and cutting thing was weird. I do wish Apple would license, or at lest sell pigtails to 3rd parties. There are crappy 3rd party imitation ones from china you can get on eBay, but they are known to catch on fire.

    9. Re:magsafe fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Citation Needed]

    10. Re:magsafe fuckers by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      He didn't use is at all.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    11. Re:magsafe fuckers by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Step up to offer the solution, or get out of the way."

      Neither of those ideas is profitable enough for Apple to bother with them.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:magsafe fuckers by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just read it unplugged, and plug it in when you put it down and go to sleep? Is your laptop battery that far gone that it can't last however long you're reading in bed?

      The Magsafe is sufficiently strong that pulling it straight out is a bit hard, but by design it disconnects easily from shearing action.

      And if there are a million other safe-break designs, why aren't any other manufacturers using it? Considering another post where Apple prevents others using Magsafe-like connectors.

    13. Re:magsafe fuckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reference? I'm not aware of any non USB 3rd party docking stations, though I have seen a few "external batteries" for PCs. I've never heard of Apple refusing to license MagSafe (and am kind of shocked the tech is actually patented by Apple, the idea has been on Deep Fryers for a while, I'd be shocked if it originated there.

    14. Re:magsafe fuckers by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Strapping a big heavy battery to a laptop would kinda negate the whole point of a compact and reasonably lightweight computer, no? ISTR IBM sort of doing this some years ago - a think laptop with very limited battery capacity and a "slice" that could clip underneath it with a bigger, bulky battery. As for docking stations, a co-worker has one of some sort for his MBP, but it's the only instance of one in use that I've seen in at least ten years. Modern laptops have most of what you need onboard, including quality displays that are larger than postage stamps and keyboards that are at least tolerable. I just don't see the demand. As for TFA, a brick that supplies 10-240 watts? I dread to think how big that would be. For many applications, it would likely be as large as the device it powers. Consider the 65w Apple brick, then picture four of them placed side by side.

    15. Re:magsafe fuckers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I still have no idea how they got that patent. Waffle irons were offered with magnetically-attached cords before Apple computer even fucking existed.

      I've been preaching against Apple pretty hard core since they started running around with fistfuls of patents. If you give Apple money you are helping them to fuck us all around.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:magsafe fuckers by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just read it unplugged, and plug it in when you put it down and go to sleep? Is your laptop battery that far gone that it can't last however long you're reading in bed?

      (a) My housemate's MacBook is permanently plugged in because the battery lasts about 10 minutes now.
      I'm not sure how old it is, but as it's completely fine at web browsing including video, there is no reason to replace it.

      (b) Some people read in bed for many hours.

  27. I'm a computer company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why would i use this 'standard'?

    I can't charge a premium for replacement cables that use my patented connector.

    500% profit even on a small item is nothing to throw away.

  28. Universal PSUs are available already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have bought several low cost universal laptop PSUs at Carrefour, for use with diverse pieces of equipment. So, this seems to be a solution looking for a problem really.

  29. Patents... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and this is why we need patent reform, but in the form of accepting fewer patents and for a shorter period of time.

    Look, it isn't as though Apple has gained nothing from their "innovation" (assuming they actually invented it) of this magnetic plug. But having this as yet another thing which only works on Macs, which everyone else is legally forbidden from adding with or without Apple's help...

    I want to make a case for how harmful this is to inventors, or even everyday coders. It's pretty much impossible now to do any software development without infringing on patents, and even if you somehow manage not to, it's impossible to know without your own legal army to research it.

    Instead, I'm going to make a simpler, easier case: I want a laptop which is not a Mac (never had Linux run well on a Mac, I don't like OS X, and I don't really want to pay the premium), but I want it to have that kind of power cord. Call it a "sense of entitlement" if you like, but this isn't just me being cheap -- I want that power cord, with a machine that runs Linux and Win7 reasonably well, and there's no technological reason I can't have that, not even anything like DRM in the way, just raw legal force.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Patents... by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      There is a reason - cost. You can't have it both ways, where you want the price of the cheaper product, but the features of the more expensive one. I'm sure Dell could work around the patent, as most companies do, but it doesn't mean they want to pay for the connector.

    2. Re:Patents... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      There is a reason - cost. You can't have it both ways, where you want the price of the cheaper product, but the features of the more expensive one.

      Ok, first, is cost really prohibitive here? I mean...

      I'm sure Dell could work around the patent, as most companies do, but it doesn't mean they want to pay for the connector.

      I suppose Dell would be that cheap, but I do have a laptop from Dell with an SSD in it. Clearly, a market exists for people who would pay a few pennies extra for some features, but not all of them -- for instance, I don't particularly care that the laptop body be a "unibody", or that the keys are backlit, etc.

      Also, "expensive" isn't nearly as much a problem as "overpriced". Pretty much every Mac geek tells you not to buy your RAM from Apple. While I can't find it now, there was a point where they had a black version for $100 more. There was a point where I'd argue that the extra price did go into valuable features, it's just that no one person wants or needs all of these features, and I'm not sure it's a reasonable price anymore.

      Most importantly, though: I don't like OS X. I really don't -- the GUI, especially. I'd prefer it to Windows, maybe, but I want to run Linux. And Linux has historically had trouble with Macbooks -- but there are plenty of PC laptops where Linux runs fine, and there's certainly not going to be software incompatibility with a power cord. So above and beyond any financial concerns, I actually can't have what I want at any price, short of hiring developers to fix the problem.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Patents... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Look, it isn't as though Apple has gained nothing from their "innovation" (assuming they actually invented it) of this magnetic plug. But having this as yet another thing which only works on Macs, which everyone else is legally forbidden from adding with or without Apple's help...

      Wrong. Other companies are not legally forbidden from using - they just have to pay a licensing fee.

      So Apple came up with a good design and they can get paid by other companies looking to use their good design. Or, the other companies can figure out some other approach which might be better. This is a much better situation that other companies just copying what seems to be "good enough" which is what you seem to advocate. Good enough is fine for some things, but it doesn't lead to innovation. Why not have companies seeking a better solution?

    4. Re:Patents... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      There is a reason - cost.

      You must think that the markup on Apple's $80 power cables is only about 10%.

      Hint: it really doesn't cost that much to make cables with magnets in them.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    5. Re:Patents... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Other companies are not legally forbidden from using - they just have to pay a licensing fee.

      Does Apple actually offer that kind of deal? Because as I understand it, there's nothing about a patent which requires you to license it. See: Watt vs Hornblower. Hornblower made a significant improvement to the steam engine, but was unable to actually implement it until Watt's patent expired.

      Kind of like how if I really loved OS X, I'd also love Macbooks, but I'd hate the fact that I can't just build a generic desktop PC and put OS X on it, and that Apple will attempt to stop me with both legal and technological means from doing so. Except without the legal force of patents, it's at least theoretically possible for someone to develop an OS to compete with OS X. With patents, there may be some feature of OS X which no other OS can legally implement for the next 30 years, at least.

      I mean, at least it's better than copyright, but with computers, 30 years may as well be lifetime + 70.

      So Apple came up with a good design and they can get paid by other companies looking to use their good design.

      If this was actually the reality, I'd have much less of an issue with it -- though another comment suggests tat Apple actually didn't come up with this design after all.

      Or, the other companies can figure out some other approach which might be better.

      This is a possible good side effect of patents -- you figure out another way to do the same thing. It might even apply to the power cord here. But sometimes, there is one obvious way to do something -- sometimes it's even implicit in the definition of the problem. And when someone patents it and sits on those patents, that invention gets locked up for 30 years. For three decades, no one can build on that idea and build something even better as a derivative work, without the permission of the person who came up with the idea.

      This is a much better situation that other companies just copying what seems to be "good enough" which is what you seem to advocate... Why not have companies seeking a better solution?

      Because it means that until someone invents something better (if there is something better which isn't derived from this thing), or until the patent expires, I have three decades of the shitty choice of either buying a Mac (which has many other qualities I dislike) or risk killing my laptop by tripping over the power cord.

      With software patents, it's worse, because I'm actually a developer. I have pretty much zero chance of writing any program that does anything interesting without violating dozens of patents, and if someone does decide to sue me, there's a very good chance it would bankrupt me to fight them. This is the worst part of intellectual property -- unlike trade secrets, IP means I can't independently invent and use anything if someone else has patented it, and the sheer number and absurdly low quality of patents out there means that someone has, and I'll never be able to find who or what until they sue me.

      I imagine it's not quite as bad in the hardware world, but that's what I'm seeing here.

      I'm also curious why companies wouldn't try to come up with a better solution anyway.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  30. Make it symetrical by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    It can be round, like a barrel connector, or just rectangular and have the pins symmetrical. Like having several positive pins on the inside, and ground pins on the outside. Make communications pins bi-directional.

    USB should have done this. I'm always needing to plug in a USB connector under a table or somewhere it's too dark. Also, as I get older, my eyes don't focus close in as well as they used to. USB also shouldn't be the same width as an RJ45.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Make it symetrical by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      USB should have done this. I'm always needing to plug in a USB connector under a table or somewhere it's too dark. Also, as I get older, my eyes don't focus close in as well as they used to. USB also shouldn't be the same width as an RJ45.

      I solved that problem by having a 4 port USB hub on my desk. No more crouching.

    2. Re:Make it symetrical by LoganDzwon · · Score: 1

      yaya, your right. I have the same complaint with Firewire 800. It's nearly square, but can only connect all the way if you have it on just the right side.

    3. Re:Make it symetrical by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There must be some USB movement about this. You are the second post complaining about not knowing how to plug in USB. I do it blind all the time (into the back of a computer from the front reaching around) and have no troubles at all. Try one way. Try the other. Done. If I'm worried about it, I can look at the connector first (or, if blind, feel for the required logo on top or the required seam on bottom), but I usually don't even bother to look at the cord. And it doesn't bother me at all to try one way then the other...

  31. Have them make is symetrical by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make it symmetrical, and make them test it with a sight impaired person. USB dropped the ball on this big-time.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Have them make is symetrical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB was designed so that it always fits correctly on the third try.

    2. Re:Have them make is symetrical by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Most of the time I plug into a USB port, I am not actually looking at what I'm doing. Are you asserting that blind people are at a massive disadvantage because they can't feel the seam on the bottom of the USB plug, or have to try twice in the jack, rotating 180 degrees between attempts? I do all the time without problem. All of the USB cords I have near me (5 from different makers for different devices) also have the USB logo in a raised figure that can be felt. Is there really some backlash regarding the connection of USB cables and the symmetry in the A connectors (none of the other USB connections have the symmetry you mention, and I don't know how the symmetry is the problem when the mini and micro USB are so small that it would be hard to tell on the connecting end which is the asymmetrically large or small part, at least for me and I have no trouble with the overly symmetrical A connector...

    3. Re:Have them make is symetrical by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      Ah, USB: The only rectangular connector that takes three tries to insert properly.

  32. What is it with you people and Apple power cables by Uhhhh+oh+ya! · · Score: 2

    I get it, it is a clever idea and just about everyone who owns an apple laptop has to bring up how they would be willing to pay an extra $100 just for the magnet plug.

    I don't like it, I have tripped over cables and such but its no big deal, usually the cable pops right out. I have even had computers come to me that had the power socket almost ripped out from tripping stories. But it has never happened to me, what has happened to me is the constant unplugging of the magnetic plug when working on macs. Multiple models and always the same annoyance of any little tug from moving the laptop unplugging it.

    I know its nothing to worry about, apple would never let people work around their patents to develop a similar on for pc's but man would that suck if the new standard was those weak little magnetic chargers.

    ok rant complete

  33. intel should have done this a while ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel has standardized all sorts of aspects of the PC architecture, from the motherboard form factor, the USB standards, PCI Express, and all sorts of stuff. Why not a standard power supply?

    Intel and Microsoft could probably team up right now, and give a reference design to Foxconn to mass produce.

  34. Don't count on it. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Didn't they try to do this same thing with phone chargers?
    Last I checked, nope, still five million kinds.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Don't count on it. by compro01 · · Score: 1

      The standard was only decided on 6 months ago!

      It takes time for new designs to integrate the new connector.

      Would you like me to wave a magic wand and disappear all the previously existing non-standard phones and chargers?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Don't count on it. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

      Was it only 6 months ago? Huh, my bad then.
      Time has been crawling for me lately.
      Thanks for the correction.

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    3. Re:Don't count on it. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Then maybe stop buying shitty phones? The last 2 phones I've owned used MicroUSB to charge.

    4. Re:Don't count on it. by compro01 · · Score: 1
      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  35. Ever Seen a Deep Fryer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exact same concept. two magnetic plates between the electrical contacts. if there is a patent for that, I'm sure they would license it for cheaper than apple:)

  36. How about making them not waste power when unused by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Apparently leaving a typical wallwart in the plug when not charging anything still wastes power and heats it up. In fact I heard unused but plugged-in wallwarts are wasting many many times as much power as all the usage of them to recharge devices.

    It should be possible to detect that no device is plugged in and somehow disconnect so the power usage is zero. I'm sure the reason this is not done is because it may require a relay or other expensive bit of hardware. It might help if any kind of standard required this.

  37. Function follows form. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The problem is that each generation of Laptop/Tablet is getting thinner or adding a new shape. Sure the Think Pad design has changed only slightly over the last 15 or so years. But other models are shaped very differently. Just think of a MacBook Air with a battery sticking out of it, like it was one of those Hot Rod cars that have the exposed engine that shoots out flames.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  38. Re:This must have been written by a communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd love to have a standard car. It really sucks that my gas tank hole is triangular and slightly smaller than most gas stations' tube-shaped nozzles.

  39. USB ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Maybe not for laptops or higher draw items ... but I've pretty much used USB charging as a criteria for most of my purchases over the last few years that need to be charged.

    If the device has something proprietary, or even something common (but not USB), I'll keep looking for a different product.

    My cell phones, iPods, GPS, and quite a few others can all charge from the same basic USB connection. Makes my life a lot simpler when I'm traveling with most of my electronics.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:USB ... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Laptops could use Micro-USB chargers as a power supply standard... if you didn't mind connecting at least 6-12 1.7-Amp (RMS, not peak) chargers to achieve it.

      A single max-powered USB charger (with data pins shorted together) can supply 1.7 amperes at 5v, or 8.5 watts.

      A typical laptop needs ~85 watts (10-20 watts less for some subnotebooks and netbooks, quite a bit more for a 17" Alienware/Clevo with desktop xeon and three drives doing RAID5). Do the math, then add a bit more because 10 USB chargers electronically switched into series and parallel to convert the power to something else aren't going to be anywhere near 100% efficient. And this ASSUMES high-powered micro-USB *chargers*, not wimpy unpowered USB ports drooling out a measly 100mA (a.k.a., 1/2 watt)

    2. Re:USB ... by bytta · · Score: 1

      That would be awesome!
      1. Get a laptop with lots of USB ports
      2. Get a lot of USB->micro-USB cables and connect the USB ports to the charger ports.
      3. Never have to charge your laptop again...

  40. Define "quickly" by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Exposed, non-wiping contacts would be expected to fail quite quickly.

    Define quickly. If the value is greater than 5 years when used on a laptop it probably doesn't matter much.

  41. I certainly hope so by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 1

    I broke my cord, bought another expensive one. It had the adapter end. Kept coming out, and stopped working after a year or so, and bought another that will hopefully last longer. They avoid standards to get money from you. Hopefully they'll make a standard and then companies will follow it.

  42. Make it USB Powered by bryansj · · Score: 0

    Just make it USB powered and then you can connect it to your laptop's USB ports... no more cables!

  43. Why carry around a bigger charger than you need? by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    This is absolutely stupid. Why would I carry around the size and weight of a 120W charger if my laptop only needs a 50W charger? Power bricks scale with output power both due to the ratings of the components inside and thermal requirements.

  44. Manufacturers will never allow it. by deadhammer · · Score: 2

    The IEEE will probably introduce a really good standard for power bricks that will be patent-free, universal and adaptable to different models and country power connector standards. This is exactly why electronics manufacturers won't adopt it. Think HP or Samsung doesn't like charging you $100 for a replacement charging adapter? You think that Dell doesn't just absolutely love it when they discontinue manufacturing on a particular laptop model and their once-device-only charge plugs become unavailable, forcing you to buy a new laptop if you ever want to see power again? The IEEE will draft the standard and release it to manufacturers, and the manufacturers will go "Whelp, that's really nice guys, but you see our laptops are speshul and wouldn't work with that standard, so no thank you."

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can get fairly cheap 3rd party power supply bricks for most notebooks. I replaced my Asus netbook power supply for $5.95 for a 3rd party adapter with all proper certifications. Asus had it for $39.95.

      Unless they patent their connector (and some do) anyone can make a replacement power supply.

    2. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The laptop market has enough competition that a single manufacturer could distinguish his product by supporting this feature. (Of course, some manufacturers will want to distinguish their products by instead supporting a feature only their proprietary plugs can do, like only-running-at-full-speed when a copyrighted certificate is passed through a fragile data pin in the very center of the power connector.) So there's every chance this will work out well.

    3. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by atrain728 · · Score: 2

      To be fair, Dell's power adapter has been the same for about 7 years now.

    4. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by businessnerd · · Score: 1

      Cell phones seemed to be standardizing, so why not laptops? Most phones now have standardized on mini or micro usb for charging where in the past, every phone that came out, even ones by the same manufacturer, all seemed to be different. Maybe that's because most cellphones don't last much more than a year and the power supply outlives the phone?

      And as one poster has already stated above, Dell has been pretty consistent with their power supplies for a while now. I've actually amassed quite the collection across multiple models of Dell laptop I've had since 2004. All are interchangeable. Although I should note that the voltage has gone up in the newer power supplies, but the lower voltage ones will still charge your battery, just a little slower. While the manufacturers may miss being able to charge you a huge margin on replacements, they may like the reduction in costs from outsourcing the power supplies to generic manufacturers. I'm sure they already do outsource, but those generic manufacturers can offer the things at much lower prices since the number of different models they need to produce will be much lower.

      --
      "It's not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." -- H. J. Simpson
    5. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      You've been able to get universal laptop chargers for years now. I've got one that will work with pretty much any major brand laptop and several brands I have never even heard of...everything except Apple. They're the only ones who are big enough jerks to patent their connector. Though to be fair, I suppose their connector is also the only one that isn't just a modified barrel plug.

      If they don't adopt it, it'll be for technical reasons. Different laptops already use different voltages sometimes; I'd rather stick with OEM plugs if the alternative is having extra voltage conversion hardware needing to be built in to every single laptop. You can buy a replacement OEM plug for $10 anyway.

    6. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Which is why it should be regulated like the EU did with phone chargers. Want to sell an electronic device in the US? Conform to the standard power supply.

    7. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU has pushed manufacturers of mobile phones on this subject and it'll solve a lot of problems:
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/technology/newsid_8124000/8124293.stm

      In Europe, we're quite progressive on all of this waste. We have product stewardship and sustainability legislation like WEEE and RoHS. This is just the start. I imagine that when the IEEE standardises this, as long as a minority of manufacturers get behind this, the EU will push it. It'll take years, but it'll happen.

      These reforms with chargers will start off with Europe, but I really wouldn't be surprised if it ended up worldwide. Economies of scale and all that.

    8. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Dell power supplies from 2003 that I am using with a current generation Dell Inspiron laptops. That is one of the main reason I have stuck with Dell over the past 8 years.

    9. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Want to sell an electronic device in the US? Conform to the standard power supply.

      Or make it an identical situation to the phone chargers. Want to sell a laptop in the EU? Have its power connector conform to the IEEE standard. Once laptop manufacturers are forced to adhere to that standard in the EU, why would they bother to manufacture a different model that uses an incompatible power standard for the US market?

    10. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhap IEEE will introdfuce a sensible standard for laptops, which everyone will follow. Oh, except Apple, Dell, Toshiba, Lenovo ...

      While we are about it, why not introduce some sensible standards for chargers in general? I have a sea of incompatible chargers, it is just absurd. They all have stupud special plugs. It has improved since USB came along - though we seem to have three different types of those, dammit! Standard, mini, micro, and then there are those weird square ones seemingly only used on printers. Why? (And while I'm moaning, wouldn't it be great if there was a standard for which way up they should be mounted. And maybe even a marker on the plug to say which way up to plug the damned thing in?)

      You do wonder, honestly, how much money manufactureres actually make from selling secondary power supplies, with their special plugs. I mean, have you ever bought one? No - me neither. So it can't be much, right? So why persecute us all?

      Ok, I feel better now. I just have go and find the charger for my Nintendo - no, not that one, the older one, the new one doesn't fit ..
      And get off my lawn.

    11. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IIRC they didn't actually regulate phone chargers, they just threatened to regulate them...

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need something like the Chinese government requiring all mobiles to use USB for charging by LAW for this to happen.

    13. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Xacid · · Score: 1

      "You think that Dell doesn't just absolutely love it when they discontinue manufacturing on a particular laptop model and their once-device-only charge plugs become unavailable, forcing you to buy a new laptop if you ever want to see power again?"

      I don't know what all you're basing this statement on but Dell's been one of the most consistent with their power supply connectors in my experience. At least 7-10 years without changing it to something incompatible.

    14. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The EU will simply mandate it, or rather threaten to mandate it and everyone will fall into line.

      They did it with phone chargers so all manufacturers started using USB. They required batteries to be removable for disposal so even Braun and Apple who loved non-user-serviceable ones started to comply.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're lucky the EU will do what they did with phones and make the standard plug compulsory. Once you start building it for the EU you might as well let the rest of the world use the generic brick too.

    16. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IEEE is essentially an industry group. Nothing goes on there that is not agreed to by several of the big players. I for one hope they use a round connector that can be plugged in any direction, not like the absolutely stupid USB connector.

    17. Re:Manufacturers will never allow it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then some other manufacturers could take advantage of such a marketing opportunity and gain share over those who don't serve you as well.

  45. How about an LVDS standard for connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a pile of perfectly good high resolution, low power consuming displays that are pretty much junk because their LVDS connectors are all incompatible with anything else with LVDS output. Even if the connectors happen to be the same, the pin configuration is still not the same. Even with an embedded (not proprietary) VIA motherboard the LVDS connectors don't match anything.

    Unless I'm missing some huge LVDS information resource in all of my searching, it's impossible to make use without going through data sheets and getting a custom cable made.

    1. Re:How about an LVDS standard for connectors by edalytical · · Score: 1

      I totally agree I have a bunch of laptop displays attached to broken laptops. It would be nice to make use of the displays. It seems the only option is to eBay the displays to someone with the same model laptop. If there was a standard connector I'd have some sweet digital picture frames or some sweet single purpose displays attached to my computer.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  46. Re:Why carry around a bigger charger than you need by Arlet · · Score: 1

    It would be stupid if the standard would exclude 50W power supply options, but there's no reason it should. It's certainly possible to standardize a range of different sizes and power levels, and provide a mechanism where an underpowered brick would simply refuse to work, instead of overheating.

  47. The existing standard for low power DC supply. by bobs666 · · Score: 1

    " In fact there already is a kind of rough standard, but it's rather an odd one. Not many people actually smoke in their cars these days, and the aperture in the dashboard which used to hold the cigar lighter is now more likely to be powering a mobile phone, CD player, fax machine or, according to a recent and highly improbable TV commercial, an instant coffee making gizmo. Because the socket originally had a different purpose it's the wrong size and in the wrong place for what we now want to do with it, so perhaps it's time to start adapting it for its new job." - Douglas Adams 1997

    So its long past time to use the standard that is inplace.

  48. Re:This must have been written by a communist by unimacs · · Score: 1

    We were primarily a Dell shop for a long time. Even with laptops from the same manufacturer they often used completely different power supplies, - meaning that if you lost or damaged one, or even left it at home you had to hope the one or two other people in the office that had laptops with the same PS could borrow you a spare until yours was replaced. Major PITA.

  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. Tripping over power cables? by quietwalker · · Score: 1

    Even with one end loosely tethered, isn't a cord stretched across any walkway an inherently dangerous thing? If not to the product, then to the person doing the tripping?

    Now, my viewpoint may be biased, because I tend to use a desk when I do my work, not a coffee bar, but I've had lots of problems with these magsafe connectors; they don't stay plugged in, or they appear plugged in, but are not actually 'all' the way in. Pulling the mouse cord when it gets stuck dislodges it, rotating the monitor a little bit dislodges them, throwing a wayward glance in their direction freakin' dislodges them.

    Besides that, shouldn't we already be using USB for this purpose? It handles up to 240v, and while the connectors are various shapes, it's ubiquitous and would require only standardization on the hardware end, and nothing on the software side.

  51. Re:How about making them not waste power when unus by cnettel · · Score: 1

    Quite a few modern chargers are active and adapt their power draw. Many are completely cool to the touch when nothing is connected. Generally, these chargers are also lighter, because they do not have the massive iron windlings of traditional transformers.

  52. Oughta? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    WTF?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  53. Wouldn't bet on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but I have a hard time believing this will work. Manufacturers haven't even come up with their own in house standardized power supplies let alone cross company ones. It seems to be too lucrative to force consumers to purchase obscenely overpriced replacements/adapters. Don't get me wrong, I wish it could work. As someone else mentioned it would make renewable (solar/motion) charging much more feasible & should bring down costs. But its going to take several major manufacturers going for it and some serious consumer demand.

  54. Only one for all of them? by gman003 · · Score: 1

    I just had to order a new power brick from Asus. They have three models to cover all their laptops: a "standard" 90W, a "notebook" 40W, and a "super" 120W. Which seems reasonable - a power brick that supplies 120W is going to be very inefficient under a 40W load. I can't imagine how inefficient a 240W one would be under 20W of load. Plus, the plug size needed for that much power would possibly be a size concern on a tiny netbook or tablet. And what happens when someone inevitably makes a laptop that draws more than 240W?

    I think a better solution would be having a small range of standards, designed for different power needs. Have a standard connector that scales depending on the power it provides - it would be 5mm for 100W, 7mm for 200W, etc. If possible, make the higher-power plugs fit into the lower-power sockets, so you can charge your 70W netbook off your 120W laptop charger. Should be relatively simple.

    1. Re:Only one for all of them? by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Power supplies that provide 90+% efficiency at 20% of their max rated load already exist. On the other hand, there are also still power supplies with only 75% efficiency at the optimal load.

      For weight concerns I agree that having different power levels would be a great idea. You don't even need different plugs, if you have smart power supply that can communicate with the device. That way, you can still use a 240W brick to power a 20W device, but not the other way around. Or a smaller brick could still be used to power a big laptop in an emergency, but force it into a lower power level.

    2. Re:Only one for all of them? by profplump · · Score: 1

      Is there some part of this I'm missing, that says all power supplies must work up to the maximum? The whole point of the negotiation is that the power supply can tell the power consumer if it can or cannot meet the demand. Hence you could produce a 50W power supply that's in-spec with this new standard, it would just tell higher-power devices that it's not big enough and refuse to power them.

  55. Not gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know, you buy an alternative power supply from a third party vendor and POOF, company A tells you that you warranty has been voided.

    So,,,,you'll still have to buy the original part from your vendor like HP, IBM and other and they'll surely get together to fix their prices so you cant buy an HP latop with an IBM power supply at a lower cost.

    Wont happen and if you do,,,,well no more warranty on your machines

  56. There Oughta Be a Standard: by doronbc · · Score: 1

    Laptop. FTFY

  57. Re:What is it with you people and Apple power cabl by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    Well just have more powerful magnets then.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  58. When they all do the same cost cutting by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'll just buy a competing brand.

    Which has more than likely done exactly the same thing. Remember when all major printer manufacturers decided not to include a USB cable? Or when all major U.S. mobile phone carriers doubled the SMS rate from 10 to 20 cents?

    1. Re:When they all do the same cost cutting by Arlet · · Score: 1

      Which has more than likely done exactly the same thing

      I see laptops getting cheaper and better every year. Apparently, competition is still working around here. My last printer that I recently bought (for less than the price of a toner cartridge of the previous one) still had a USB cable, and my SMS rate has not gone up.

  59. What does it mean? by jafac · · Score: 1

    USB... "Universal Serial Bus" . . . so, "Universal means, WHAT exactly? Given that there are like, 8 or 9 different connectors that I can think of off the top of my head (never mind the plethora of devices that ship without working drivers for all but one preferred OS platform.)

    Standard my ass.

    Whatever they come up with - will be cool in concept, and will SUCK in implementation.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  60. Magnet Attachment Work-Around by Compulawyer · · Score: 1

    Apple's patent in this area is actually fairly simple to work around. It provides good coverage for Apple's design, but there is a lot of room for modifications.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  61. Plague by macraig · · Score: 1

    Wall warts were a plague on humanity before laptops existed. They're also just one of many things that should have been standardized long ago but weren't, for no other reason than fear of losing a competitive advantage (via what we know as "lock-in" in particular).

    Conversely, there are de facto standards that never should have seen the light of day, like the Windows Registry.

  62. MagSafe could be better by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    Even the current MagSafe design is somewhat lacking. I've tried to use it while laying down and the connector constantly disconnects. Stronger magnets please!

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  63. what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you follow all the gadget blogs the future is in wireless charging pads
    sure the efficiency is down to about 3-15%, but there's one less wire! therefore it's better.

  64. a safe claim by amn108 · · Score: 1

    12V by 4.5A ought to be enough for everyone!

  65. That's the spirit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes yes! And while we're at it, why not just write on paper instead of a laptop word processor?

  66. Re:This must have been written by a communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your analogy fails. The "Gas Pump" in this case is already standardized. That is your wall socket and every laptop sold in America has the same connection for that.

  67. No they don't. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I have a Google Nexus One phone, made by HTC. It takes a "standard" micro-USB plug, which is used by many digital cameras and other devices.

    In fact, a couple of days ago I charged it using the wall-wart that came with my Logitech Harmony 700 remote control.

    It's operating just fine; except that every time I get a tweet my TiVo tunes to ESPN 8, The Ocho.

  68. Re:Brilliant sir, but what if there's...a fire by profplump · · Score: 1

    Your blender has even higher voltages and was made by low-cost leaders turning out pure crap. So was every other blender clock for the last 50 years or so. I don't understand why these would be any different.

    Also, the power supplies would continue to be made by the same people already making them, they would just be marketed under another brand. It's not like power supplies are currently made by a big-name company in Colorado -- they are already a near-commodity item made overseas by whoever puts in the lowest bid.

  69. Re:How about making them not waste power when unus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either you're a time traveller who just arrived from 1990, or you're ridiculously ignorant; either way, you should be informing yourself rather than suggesting "improvements".

    Practically all wall warts these days, and ALL laptop PSUs, are switching power supplies. They only draw leakage current when unloaded.

  70. Re:What is it with you people and Apple power cabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Owning a MacBook for 2 years put me in the habit of grabbing the plug every time I picked up/moved the laptop because of how overly easy it is to unplug, can't even begin to count how many times it unplugged in annoying ways.

    Now back on a non-Apple machine I still grab at the plug when picking the machine up out of now deep rooted into my subconscious fear of it unplugging, thank you Apple!

  71. The Macintosh or the Cairn Terrier? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There was a classic article from back in 1984 comparing the relative benefits and costs of getting a Macintosh or a Cairn Terrier. A cairn terrier is a dog like Toto. Costs less than the Mac, probably has less memory, can't do astrophysics, does a much better job of playing fetch, good with kids.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  72. Re:How about making them not waste power when unus by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Afaict the issue of wall warts drawing power when not in use improved considerablly with the move from designs using a transformer as the first stay to switched mode designs (thse do still contain a transformer for isolation reasons but it's much smaller and runs at much higher frequencies). Small cheap mains transformers are notoriously lossy.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  73. Add optical thunderbolt by Brownian+Motion · · Score: 1
    About time.

    I want a magsafe universal power adapter that has an optical thunderbolt cable running down it. Dock? Who needs a dock? Attach mag adapter and your desktop power adapter then has the ports that you need in it. Can still be cheaper/smaller ones used for travel w/o the ports/thunderbolt.

    And, I think overall, if companies didn't spend the money designing and stocking multiple power supplies they'd make more money than what they are doing now selling expensive power adapters. Users would also be happier, thus more likely to buy. Vendor might even get away with NOT including a power adapter in the box. Doubly so if it works on more than just laptops like the claim.

    Overall better for the world as well waste less resources/store less junk because power supplies can outlive the gadget they are hooked to. Also, companies can be encouraged to make better more efficient power supplies. Right now you have to take what you get.

    Apple at least keeps cables and power adapters around a long time, but it's even better if EVERYONE used the same cables/power supply.

  74. Apple Magsafe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MagSafe connector is neat enough, but they use exactly the same connector on all of the laptop power supplies.

    Makes it all too easy to connect a low capacity adapter to a high capacity laptop. Oh, I don't mind that I can plug a low-end laptop into the supply for my MacBook Pro 17 - that's fine. It's the fact that I can do the reverse that worries me - I suspect that drawing the power for a fully-loaded MBP 17 from a supply rated for half that might result in it getting quite warm, and possibly melting/catching fire.

    Or have they thought of that?

  75. It's already a point of failure by hawk · · Score: 1

    My MacBook wasn't charging, and I found the charger wasn't well-seated.

    Hmm, that alignment ring is loose.

    Gee, it's bent out of shape, too;maybe I can straighten it with a pair of needle nose.

    Wait a minute, it's a *STAPLE*.

    It ran fine until the charge ran down.

    Fifteen years ago, I would have just unsoldered the fuse from the motherboard and placed it, but I can't find any information on doing that these days :(

    hawk

  76. Why do you need adapter by nikanth · · Score: 1

    if those devices just plugged into the wall socket to charge directly from A/C?

  77. Re:This must have been written by a communist by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Slashdot needs a -1 whoosh.

  78. Re:Why carry around a bigger charger than you need by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    The idea is to standardize the PLUG. Then all you need to do is find a charger that matches the voltage (most laptops use one of 4 voltages) and exceeds the wattage rating and you're home free.

  79. Where the hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is my inductive charger? Screw adapters, the Palm Pre had it and nobody seems to be following suit.

  80. How hard is it? by black+soap · · Score: 1

    I was once shown a laptop that had its own built-in power supply. It could accept 50 or 60 Hz AC at 100-240 V, or DC anywhere from 6-30 V. A standard cord (like the one running from your brick to the wall) would plug it in, or you could use any cord that would fit. Might not be as light-weight as a modern laptop would be, but it sure was convenient. It booted up just fine after being in storage over a decade, too.

  81. Cue lawsuits from 3rd party manufacturers by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    If this passes, it'll totally erode the business model of a lot of companies that make replacement AC adapters. Look at eBay and type in "Dell Power Adapter" and you'll see that there are tons of "knock offs" out there. On second thought, maybe this would be a good thing for the economy since most of the knock offs come from China. Oh wait, so do the real ones. Oh well!

  82. NOT a patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the apple power-cord magnet isnt a patent.
    japanese hot-water makers had them for ages already // idiots

  83. Standardize and kill innovation by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    The problems with standardizing is that it kills innovation. Maybe once we have a close to perfect power supply, then we should look to standardize. Meanwhile, let's keep the innovations coming.