Solar costs continue to drop. Coal, being a mature technology, is variable pretty much strictly by way of market volatility. In 3 years, your 3KW becomes 5-6KW. In 10 years, it becomes 10KW, which is to say, cost-competitive.
Developing policy for a future in which coal is anything but an afterthought is a bad plan.
In his defense, not that he needs it, he's quite often got proof behind him. In this case, they've been investigating a while and are running out of threads. It's not exactly like his first call was "ULA DID IT!"
Because it's not what they're good at. That's a built-in component of how a market works - if you're not productive with a technology you own, see if someone else thinks they will be, and then sell it to them. Licensing is like selling, except you get to be owner as a service, which is, you know, better.
I don't think using the S Pen is an edge case. I bought a Note 2 and a Note 4 specifically to have a built-in stylus. I would suggest that given the number of high-quality large phones out there, yours is much closer to the edge case, for exactly the reason you stated - the Note is the only flagship device with a stylus.
Directors being sociopathic dicks aside, the fact that you *can* get reactions is entirely outside my point. Those actors could certainly have given those performances without those stimuli. What you're describing is called "The Method", except because these directors are stupid sociopaths, they don't trust their actors to use the method in the appropriate way. See, the normal way that shit works is that you find a piece of yourself that maps to the moment in question, and then you work on that mapping internally until it fucking clicks. You don't use shit off the cuff, and you don't fuck around with things you're not ready to use. Putting the stimulus into the real world eclipses any hope of actually doing that work.
I've cried in productions. Cried to break my worthless little heart. It's not fucking hard. It's hard not to when you get the work done and you get into the scene. There's nothing interesting about taking the option of doing the work out of the actor's hand; it's quite simply something that caters entirely to someone's worthless ideas about what they want.
Sorry, this is a complete misunderstanding of how acting works. The way that an actor expresses surprise - or shock or fear or love - is very different from the way their character does so. Making a moment surprising or shocking or horrifying for an actor is anathema to the process of creating a moment using an actor. If you want that, just do documentaries and reality TV. You don't need to hire someone whose entire life has been spent refining their empathetic muscles if you just want the person onscreen to display their own feelings.
Structuring actually follows pretty stringent requirements. You can get an exemption from normal structuring processing as a small business owner.
Source: I actually work in the industry.
So what you're saying is in a hundred years my grandkids will be happily living their lives as ghosts in the machine and/or megaflocks of nanomachines?
I'm writing my own material and learning to draw because I don't see another way to make what I want to make. I look at your body of work and I wonder: How you were able to slide these incredible missives from the Gonzoverse under the brane, and was there anything you did early on that allowed you to make the incredible defining works in your bibliography (Transmet, Planetary, Authority)?
That depends,of course, on how well it scales. If you can get enough thrust from a small enough energy input, you can partially or completely remove the dependency on giant volatile chemical vats.
Waiting on a stand with a Dell Inspiron 7500, the biggest, heaviest beast of a laptop I've ever owned. Months later I was accused of programming while driving the taxi, which never occurred to me but, it occurs to me, would have been texting-while-driving before it was (un)cool to do so.
And it is subject to the Flynn effect. So saying "It can be measured" hardly invalidates the idea that a better model of intelligence for aged brains will incorporate the various other things that are affecting the measurement.
Because scientists, unlike media, have a method for indicating precision of results, and order of magnitude is an intrinsically fuzzy term, whereas about ten times is not.
Which it isn't. The past 20 years haven't been at a standstill. Predicting future product releases based on not having released the product would always give you an infinite horizon. It's not a useful metric.
Slashdot Mirror
Solar costs continue to drop. Coal, being a mature technology, is variable pretty much strictly by way of market volatility. In 3 years, your 3KW becomes 5-6KW. In 10 years, it becomes 10KW, which is to say, cost-competitive.
Developing policy for a future in which coal is anything but an afterthought is a bad plan.
Guessing they're referring to this.
They're clearly using adjusted dollars for both figures.
I'm gonna guess Stepford Husbands are the simpler ask, though probably still won't come along til after dudes get what they want.
In his defense, not that he needs it, he's quite often got proof behind him. In this case, they've been investigating a while and are running out of threads. It's not exactly like his first call was "ULA DID IT!"
It's always helpful and constructive to look back thousands of years to find the reasons why your shitty racism is justified.
Not to mention Israel's a multicultural society that includes Christians, Muslims, and lots of other folks.
Because it's not what they're good at. That's a built-in component of how a market works - if you're not productive with a technology you own, see if someone else thinks they will be, and then sell it to them. Licensing is like selling, except you get to be owner as a service, which is, you know, better.
As will humans, of course.
Um... http://www.lgnewsroom.com/2016...
I don't think using the S Pen is an edge case. I bought a Note 2 and a Note 4 specifically to have a built-in stylus. I would suggest that given the number of high-quality large phones out there, yours is much closer to the edge case, for exactly the reason you stated - the Note is the only flagship device with a stylus.
Directors being sociopathic dicks aside, the fact that you *can* get reactions is entirely outside my point. Those actors could certainly have given those performances without those stimuli. What you're describing is called "The Method", except because these directors are stupid sociopaths, they don't trust their actors to use the method in the appropriate way. See, the normal way that shit works is that you find a piece of yourself that maps to the moment in question, and then you work on that mapping internally until it fucking clicks. You don't use shit off the cuff, and you don't fuck around with things you're not ready to use. Putting the stimulus into the real world eclipses any hope of actually doing that work.
I've cried in productions. Cried to break my worthless little heart. It's not fucking hard. It's hard not to when you get the work done and you get into the scene. There's nothing interesting about taking the option of doing the work out of the actor's hand; it's quite simply something that caters entirely to someone's worthless ideas about what they want.
Sorry, this is a complete misunderstanding of how acting works. The way that an actor expresses surprise - or shock or fear or love - is very different from the way their character does so. Making a moment surprising or shocking or horrifying for an actor is anathema to the process of creating a moment using an actor. If you want that, just do documentaries and reality TV. You don't need to hire someone whose entire life has been spent refining their empathetic muscles if you just want the person onscreen to display their own feelings.
Structuring actually follows pretty stringent requirements. You can get an exemption from normal structuring processing as a small business owner. Source: I actually work in the industry.
So what you're saying is in a hundred years my grandkids will be happily living their lives as ghosts in the machine and/or megaflocks of nanomachines?
I'm writing my own material and learning to draw because I don't see another way to make what I want to make. I look at your body of work and I wonder: How you were able to slide these incredible missives from the Gonzoverse under the brane, and was there anything you did early on that allowed you to make the incredible defining works in your bibliography (Transmet, Planetary, Authority)?
They got micronewtons from watts, not kilowatts.
That depends,of course, on how well it scales. If you can get enough thrust from a small enough energy input, you can partially or completely remove the dependency on giant volatile chemical vats.
Waiting on a stand with a Dell Inspiron 7500, the biggest, heaviest beast of a laptop I've ever owned. Months later I was accused of programming while driving the taxi, which never occurred to me but, it occurs to me, would have been texting-while-driving before it was (un)cool to do so.
So someone takes this, layers it with ablative armor, and suddenly you have a long-range, well-armored vehicle. What's the problem?
Luckily having a giant tank of gas under the car is much safer.
And powered by thorium?
basic IQ can be measured.
And it is subject to the Flynn effect. So saying "It can be measured" hardly invalidates the idea that a better model of intelligence for aged brains will incorporate the various other things that are affecting the measurement.
Because scientists, unlike media, have a method for indicating precision of results, and order of magnitude is an intrinsically fuzzy term, whereas about ten times is not.
Which it isn't. The past 20 years haven't been at a standstill. Predicting future product releases based on not having released the product would always give you an infinite horizon. It's not a useful metric.