I'd be happy if they'd just provide a valid search feature. Not sure what their reasoning is, but each year it sucks harder. Worse, it provided more features and relevant returns 10 years ago.
They've been forewarned, so if anything did occur the studio and theater could be argued financially culpable. However, the press release stated they were pulling the Christmas release, not shelving the release altogether.
So, you consider a corporation above the law when acting to protect its intellectual property? An eye for an eye doesn't quite fit with the modern rule of law.
So, your contention is solely with the viability of the scenario? You might consider that information is a commodity, as well something to be utilized.
It's difficult to imagine an entity proclaiming itself as protecting the citizens, all the while removing the protections we've enjoyed as a people all these years.
Is the NSA so magnanimous that they can be trusted without question with all one's personal day-to-day activities and conversation? Should that even be an option for consideration?
If you can gain a fairly keen insight into a person from them answering 567 questions on the MMPI-2, what do you suppose could be learned from thousands of posts and emails? This could be performed without human intervention and continuously appended. Perhaps it already is. How about when you toss in personal phone calls?
No, placing an individual's exploitable frailties and weaknesses in a database for ready use isn't just immoral, it is evil. It is invasion of the psyche, and that the true crux of privacy issues.
Re:Your search - lolcats - did not match any docum
on
Google, Circa 2001
·
· Score: 1
Oh, and don't forget IRC. Usenet sucked back in the day, considering modem speeds and the overhead from UUencoding. Most transfers happened via IRC bots and FTP servers. Many an unsuspecting corporate site had their/incoming directories become very popular overnight. Spring break would hit and the EDU's would start popping up on the FTP lists traded on efnet.
One of the more interesting things to do to an admin was create a directory under their/incoming using vt100 codes, where it wasn't immediately visible. They'd see heavy traffic and disk space filling up, yet not be able to figure out the how and why. It also had the added benefit of keeping Windows FTP clients from accessing the site.
The reason for IP is to give the creators an incentive to create, not for the folks who buy the rights to profit off of them for all eternity.
So, you're all for giving the studios an incentive to off their writers?
I'm surprised they've ventured into this territory. People will ask me about what I used to do and when I explain that I was a usenet provider, I usually get a blank stare and a nod. It isn't well known and it is rather archaic.
However, if someone can configure their P2P client behind a firewall, then they can pretty much master whichever news reader they find. If they do a little reading and discover search sites that allow for a roll-your-own NZB, they'll never go back to P2P. Why take a chance on getting busted when you can get an album by double clicking on a single NZB file? While your there, why not pick up some warez and porn?
They are taking a big gamble by bringing about an awareness of usenet. Sheesh, Time Warner is now outsourcing their news to newshosting.com. Do they really want to awaken all the limewire users to the fact that hundreds of albums are available in lossless format for free and secure courtesy of their provider? Check out the comments to that article, you can tell from the replies a lot of the respondents have no idea what usenet is.
Oh well, maybe this is just a sign that they are in their final death throes.
To their credit, Yahoo Mail has carried the old Rocketmail users throughout their many transitions. Not that it requires that much extra effort, but it's does factor into their efforts, having to carry my account for the last 10 years or so.....
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry, my memory doesn't extend to URLs from a year ago, but it sure beats issues in interacting with others socially.
I've got an ISO image I downloaded from Microsoft back in April of last year without having to provide any details.
You could always just use VyprVPN, that way only the FBI would have your information.
That's mighty cavalier of you, but the fact remains that exploited machines affect the rest of us as well.
First On Race Day would be the antithesis.
http://nypost.com/2014/12/21/s...
I'd be happy if they'd just provide a valid search feature. Not sure what their reasoning is, but each year it sucks harder. Worse, it provided more features and relevant returns 10 years ago.
I'm easy to please, PONG FTW!
They've been forewarned, so if anything did occur the studio and theater could be argued financially culpable. However, the press release stated they were pulling the Christmas release, not shelving the release altogether.
Because most things that are illegal are generally frowned upon?
So, you consider a corporation above the law when acting to protect its intellectual property? An eye for an eye doesn't quite fit with the modern rule of law.
So, your contention is solely with the viability of the scenario? You might consider that information is a commodity, as well something to be utilized.
It's difficult to imagine an entity proclaiming itself as protecting the citizens, all the while removing the protections we've enjoyed as a people all these years.
Is the NSA so magnanimous that they can be trusted without question with all one's personal day-to-day activities and conversation? Should that even be an option for consideration?
If you can gain a fairly keen insight into a person from them answering 567 questions on the MMPI-2, what do you suppose could be learned from thousands of posts and emails? This could be performed without human intervention and continuously appended. Perhaps it already is. How about when you toss in personal phone calls?
No, placing an individual's exploitable frailties and weaknesses in a database for ready use isn't just immoral, it is evil. It is invasion of the psyche, and that the true crux of privacy issues.
ahh.. you beat me to it.
Oh, and don't forget IRC. Usenet sucked back in the day, considering modem speeds and the overhead from UUencoding. Most transfers happened via IRC bots and FTP servers. Many an unsuspecting corporate site had their /incoming directories become very popular overnight. Spring break would hit and the EDU's would start popping up on the FTP lists traded on efnet.
One of the more interesting things to do to an admin was create a directory under their /incoming using vt100 codes, where it wasn't immediately visible. They'd see heavy traffic and disk space filling up, yet not be able to figure out the how and why. It also had the added benefit of keeping Windows FTP clients from accessing the site.
The reason for IP is to give the creators an incentive to create, not for the folks who buy the rights to profit off of them for all eternity. So, you're all for giving the studios an incentive to off their writers?
A Ryo-Ohki of my very own?
It's a conspiracy of the Jews! ...wait, no that's Bobby Fischer.
I'm surprised they've ventured into this territory. People will ask me about what I used to do and when I explain that I was a usenet provider, I usually get a blank stare and a nod. It isn't well known and it is rather archaic.
However, if someone can configure their P2P client behind a firewall, then they can pretty much master whichever news reader they find. If they do a little reading and discover search sites that allow for a roll-your-own NZB, they'll never go back to P2P. Why take a chance on getting busted when you can get an album by double clicking on a single NZB file? While your there, why not pick up some warez and porn?
They are taking a big gamble by bringing about an awareness of usenet. Sheesh, Time Warner is now outsourcing their news to newshosting.com. Do they really want to awaken all the limewire users to the fact that hundreds of albums are available in lossless format for free and secure courtesy of their provider? Check out the comments to that article, you can tell from the replies a lot of the respondents have no idea what usenet is.
Oh well, maybe this is just a sign that they are in their final death throes.
Contact Tina at Axishost. They've been running specials, 2 for 1 on prepayment for hosting. You'll find competent, knowledgeable people to deal with.
Really? Looks like web.archive.org is in for some trouble then.
To their credit, Yahoo Mail has carried the old Rocketmail users throughout their many transitions. Not that it requires that much extra effort, but it's does factor into their efforts, having to carry my account for the last 10 years or so.....