Slashdot Mirror


User: said213

said213's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
194
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 194

  1. Re:Do your part! Snail-mail your comments! on USPS Losing Battle Against the E-mail Age · · Score: 0

    i think you're now just arguing out of boredom.

    when did you the ending?

  2. Re:Do your part! Snail-mail your comments! on USPS Losing Battle Against the E-mail Age · · Score: 0

    "A constable is a person holding a particular office, most commonly in law enforcement." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constable]

    And, no. The sorts of things which we'd be talking about would be civil actions such as tax or debt collection suits or... mortgage foreclosures.
    Those are generally mailed first and may never be formally delivered by anyone, much less a constable. In place of the "Constable" you have what is known as a "Courier." The "Courier" will attempt to deliver a package requiring a signature... UPS and FedEx are sufficient to prove attempt to serve notice.

    However; If you need legal proof of meeting your obligations... the only legally indisputable method available is certified mail. I live in Ohio, but here's a guy from Alabamer to fill you in:

    http://www.alabamaconsumerlawblog.com/2011/06/the_importance_of_using_certif.html

  3. Re:USA on TSA Groper Files Suit Against Blogger · · Score: 0

    figure out how to log in before you start pointing your limp finger at people around.

  4. Re:Do your part! Snail-mail your comments! on USPS Losing Battle Against the E-mail Age · · Score: 0

    Are constables also frequently described as being Jack booted thugs?
    If so, then yes.

  5. Re:Do your part! Snail-mail your comments! on USPS Losing Battle Against the E-mail Age · · Score: 1

    Spoken like someone who's never sent, received or needed proof of delivery of certified mail.
    Look it up... then consider my question again. If the USPS goes away, your next court summons would have to be delivered by a law enforcement official, you would have no legally protected proof (audited) of mailing or receipt... Good times there.

    Some things cannot be privatized.

  6. Re:Do your part! Snail-mail your comments! on USPS Losing Battle Against the E-mail Age · · Score: 0

    Considering that it is a given that some items will forever (relative to our current lifespan expectations) remain available only in physical form, please explain; What will replace the USPS?

  7. Re:The cops who wrote those emails should be fired on Anonymous Retaliates, Leaks Texas Police Emails · · Score: 0

    I referred to you as being an asshole because you appear to be too bright to be as obtuse as you are presenting in words.
    Don't blame the internet... I'm just one moron with a commoner's opinion and a bloated sense of self-importance.

  8. Re:The cops who wrote those emails should be fired on Anonymous Retaliates, Leaks Texas Police Emails · · Score: 0

    I view the first sign of a firearm on anyone, functioning in any capacity, as the only sign needed to avoid at all costs or to approach with extreme caution. Just those two options, though. Some assumptions are necessary, healthy and important.

  9. Re:The cops who wrote those emails should be fired on Anonymous Retaliates, Leaks Texas Police Emails · · Score: 0

    "Criminal Justice Resources :
    Police Corruption - Police Integrity"

    http://staff.lib.msu.edu/harris23/crimjust/polcorr.htm

    Please take note of the numerous .edu and .gov references... and the fact that you're a bit of an asshole.

  10. Re:The TLAs and Corporate Lackeys on Warrantless Wiretapping Cases At the 9th Circuit · · Score: 0

    You pointed out a visible boogeyman... it looked like an "OMGPONIES" moment... And, while I understand the point you were out to make, that point doesn't really accomplish much of a constructive nature. Fingers can be used to point, but they can also be used to secure things worth holding on to. The thing worth pointing at is rarely worth holding on to.

    Mostly, though; I'm just feeling ornery. Thanks for sharing!

  11. Re:Let's Impeach the Prseident on Warrantless Wiretapping Cases At the 9th Circuit · · Score: 0

    Let's remember: He's not in office anymore and the person who's replaced him hasn't seen fit to do otherwise.
    Scarey, isn't it.

  12. Re:The TLAs and Corporate Lackeys on Warrantless Wiretapping Cases At the 9th Circuit · · Score: 0

    "They did it in Star Trek"

    Star Trek is all fiction... None of the characters exist and, by extension; none of the characters "did" anything.
    Sorry for pointing this out, but that statement is just nonsense.

  13. Re:The TLAs and Corporate Lackeys on Warrantless Wiretapping Cases At the 9th Circuit · · Score: 0

    Please tell me that you are aware that virrtually anyone can become a freemason.
    It's not some super-exclusive-secretive-conspiracy group.

    Wake up.

  14. Re:The TLAs and Corporate Lackeys on Warrantless Wiretapping Cases At the 9th Circuit · · Score: 0

    And Odie.

  15. Dupe on Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda Resigns From Slashdot · · Score: 0

    Isn't this s dupe? Or, will that happen on Saturday?

  16. Re:Home on the Web? on Facebook Makes Privacy Settings More Obvious · · Score: 0

    "by Anonymous Coward"

    you can filter them out, right?

  17. Re:Anon on Building a Better 'Anonymous?' · · Score: 0

    what part here is truth and what part here hurts? it's pretty hard to sort out:

    1. want to remain anonymous? don't access 'anonymous' related communications channels
    2. want to not become involved? don't access 'anonymous' related communications channels
    3. want to become involved without becoming affiliated? don't access 'anonymous' related communications channels

    what you are not understanding that anyone can take 'anonymous' action, at any time, with or without direction

    which leads me to:

    4. morons expect nothing more.

  18. Re:"Companies will not pack up and leave" on Why Companies Knowingly Ship Insecure Devices · · Score: 0

    "when was the last time you even saw an air ambulance that didn't use a ducted fan tail rotor, i.e. one that wasn't an EC-135 (Eurocopter)?"

    this morning?

  19. Re:LOL, "really inflammatory, inaccurate" messages on UK Police Arrest 12 Over Facebook Use Inciting Riots · · Score: 0

    no betting! given that you are a fucking retard, it is universally immoral to gamble with you.

  20. Re:Pizza Tracking on Google Patents Telling Time · · Score: 0

    this post makes sad bear sad.

  21. Re:Uhm... DUH. on Anonymous Vows To Destroy Facebook · · Score: 0

    Actually... no. Short of removing the battery, you cannot disable the GPS functionality of your phone.
    You can limit your ability to access it (GPS), but simply cannot, disable location functionality in your mobile device without rendering the device unuseable.

  22. Re:Uhm... DUH. on Anonymous Vows To Destroy Facebook · · Score: 0

    Maybe I, unlike you, value this poster's opinions and appreciate the perspective, time and consideration taken in presenting a valuable line of thought to consider while observing the general conversation in this thread.

    Do you attack everyone you don't agree with? Are you familiar with the terms 'conjecture' and 'discourse' or are you feeling more arrogant and entitled than you have convinced yourself you are?

    If you don't care for the hyperbolic talk, there are many posts below those which you have taken issue with... move on.

  23. Re:All computers are less secure on Macs More Vulnerable Than Windows For Enterprise · · Score: 0

    well, satan lover; you missed the part where the admin account credential is pilfered by the exploit... wait for it... making your rant misplaced.
    react to this trolling post instead... you'll be right; i am trolling!

  24. Re:A virus? In my MAC? on Macs More Vulnerable Than Windows For Enterprise · · Score: 0

    Forward your email address, please?

  25. Re:Anon on Building a Better 'Anonymous?' · · Score: 0

    That's the best idea ever!
    Maybe I should register for a permit too.
    Moron.