No, it's not. It has serious flaws: e.g. a Dem vote in Utah is irrelevant, as is a Repub vote in California. It gives disproprotionate power to small population states. A straight-up popular vote would have flaws too, but at least that would be truly democratic.
It does not subvert the Constitution in any way, shape or form. From Article II:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress
In other words, a state can choose electors however it wants to choose them. Next time, you might want to get a clue about what you're talking about before posting...
There's a difference between what he said "known malware", i.e. programs, and your character known behavior.
Out of curiousity, how in the world is this related to basic math?
That isn't correct. Today's top of the line security software can detect threats that have never been seen before. It works by detecting behavior, not signatures.
Yeah, like that would ever happen. The government doesn't do that with illegals, especially not under the Bush administration. In 1999, the United States initiated fines against 417 companies for hiring illegals. In 2004, it issued fine notices to three.
Face it, businesses control this country. They believe that old saying "What's good for General Motors is good for the America."
I've tried this and keep in mind it's SURFING, not maximum throughput. I can get a maximum of about 380 KBs downloading podcasts with Juice. With SurfSpeed I get about 20 KBs.
If a DRM scheme were to be devised that allowed complete and unfettered exercise of fair-use rights, I don't think the FSF would oppose that.
Yeah, it would.
Freedom (as in the FSF definition of freedom - think free software) requires that a user have total ability to create derived works. Fair-use is not enough in the FSF's view.
So, it's (DRM) a system that necessarily requires that owners of equipment not be able to modify, service, understand or improve on their own equipment. Now, if that sounds familiar, it's because those are the principals that underpin free and open source software. DRM is antithetical to free and open source for that reason.
Slashdot Mirror
Having read the email, he sounds REALLY unhappy. He probably should have quit a long time ago...
Unconstitutional? Not on your life.
So, Congress can consent. It's really not that hard...
No, it's not. It has serious flaws: e.g. a Dem vote in Utah is irrelevant, as is a Repub vote in California. It gives disproprotionate power to small population states. A straight-up popular vote would have flaws too, but at least that would be truly democratic.
The CIA didn't fire her, BAE did...
He doesn't like the cascading part of CSS. Guess what Johnny? That's OO. Maybe Dvorak just isn't smart enough to use CSS.
If this guy doesn't get help at Charter, he should get help somewhere...
The only thing this might show is that you should never put all of your outsourcing eggs into a single basket. You need to spread them around.
For example, does the community that forms around an open source project have n log(n) value where n is the number of members in that community?
That guy is wrong about so many things regarding open source, this is just the latest...
Remember to try the veal...
then the criminal networks will target Macs too. This isn't about the inherent security of the platform, it's about the market share of the platform.
No, it won't. The kid isn't being charged with a crime, he's being suspended from school. And rightfully so...
There's a difference between what he said "known malware", i.e. programs, and your character known behavior. Out of curiousity, how in the world is this related to basic math?
That isn't correct. Today's top of the line security software can detect threats that have never been seen before. It works by detecting behavior, not signatures.
In many newer neighborhoods (last 25 years) within a subdivision they are buried. However, the lines to the subdivision are above ground.
Yeah, like that would ever happen. The government doesn't do that with illegals, especially not under the Bush administration. In 1999, the United States initiated fines against 417 companies for hiring illegals. In 2004, it issued fine notices to three. Face it, businesses control this country. They believe that old saying "What's good for General Motors is good for the America."
Who knew that Windows development at Microsoft was anything like Iraq in the Bush administration. Tell the truth and it won't be accepted...
I've tried this and keep in mind it's SURFING, not maximum throughput. I can get a maximum of about 380 KBs downloading podcasts with Juice. With SurfSpeed I get about 20 KBs.
And get a little over 3 mb/s in user transfer speed on my BellSouth DSL. Given latency issues, that seems reasonable to me...
Don't know who mod'd you down for that, but they shouldn't have. Your response is spot on...
A lot of people that would prefer not to buy a separate product from Adobe ($200) to create PDFs from Office documents.
Yeah, it would.
Freedom (as in the FSF definition of freedom - think free software) requires that a user have total ability to create derived works. Fair-use is not enough in the FSF's view.