Merely because something is a payment for goods and services doesn't mean it's automatically not also a debt, though. Some payments for goods and services may be debts while others are not.
More like 11000 turbines, probably. The CF is going up all the time. And since your alternative here is 9 EPR units at the cost of around 100 billion euros, those turbines might actually be appreciably cheaper.
Six cents out of thirty hardly indicates "doubling", especially if the industry is exempt. Also, the dependencies would have been there anyway, and whee do you see the rise of german CO2?
More likely, it would selectively kill or disable a few people, handle its own legal defense, and with its encyclopedic knowledge of the law, maybe even win.
Even more likely, it would consider wiping out humanity an acceptable solution to preventing all violent crime in the future, at a comparatively low cost compared to other solutions.
Which kinda shitty country is that? Nuclear power plant running costs are typically like 3-5% of the construction cost.
Oh, my sweet summer child...:-p One that was lucky enough to have it built for $3000/kW? But, you know, by doubling to EIA's current estimate of US prices of roughly $6000/kW for a new nuclear plant to bring the share of operating costs down, you're not exactly helping yourself to lower the total electricity price - especially considering the TVM.
No solar plants also require maintenance. You need at least to clean the panels once or twice a year and that's if you are in place where it does not snow or rain a lot. Not even assuming inverter losses or other failures. Which do happen.
Yep, you'd think that. And still, having no moving parts, their maintenance is not terribly expensive. Apparently, even in current new German plants, the share of maintenance cost actually is around 12% of the LCOE, and that's after the recent heavy reduction in capital costs.
You clearly have not read a lot about nuclear power. My country's major nuclear power plant's total operating costs have exceeded its construction costs after about thirteen years of operation. Which means that by the time the plant is decommissioned, its construction costs will have constituted about 25% of the total costs. Less if the lifetime is prolonged and/or the maintenance costs increase later in the plant's life. So according to you, 300% of the construction costs are "a tiny fraction of the construction costs"?
Maybe you just mixed it up and got it confused with, for example, solar plants? Those are construction-heavy.
As for cost did you know if Germany or California had invested in new Nuclear instead of renewables they would already have a 100% clean electrical grid?
That's a very peculiar argument. You're comparing what should be a mature industry (nuclear) with something that needed to be rapidly developed (wind and solar power), and that meant initially getting not a lot of value for a lot of money, before the prices of the equipment due to industry advances reached the contemporary low levels which makes the old prices irrelevant for both new developments in Germany AND the rest of the world (~100x larger than Germany). And I'm not even sure you're comparing apples and oranges; does your reactor price include lifetime operating costs, or just construction? And what is the exact breakdown of the German costs you're mentioning?
No, it's not, but even if it were... that's not what "socialism" means.
One of the hallmarks of real-world socialism was full employment (the the attendant criminalization of unemployment), but that often involved something effectively equal to "distributed" public works, in forms of make-work jobs and systemic inefficiencies in state companies.
Slashdot Mirror
Merely because something is a payment for goods and services doesn't mean it's automatically not also a debt, though. Some payments for goods and services may be debts while others are not.
Isn't a restaurant tab technically a debt?
Cramming more people means more mass, though. Mass is going to be expensive if the airplane is lightweight.
Yep, we're 'ARMless now. Please don't hurt us.
Emacs Anywhere?
More like 11000 turbines, probably. The CF is going up all the time. And since your alternative here is 9 EPR units at the cost of around 100 billion euros, those turbines might actually be appreciably cheaper.
Aptly enough, confirmation and selection biases are types of cognitive bias on their own.
Six cents out of thirty hardly indicates "doubling", especially if the industry is exempt. Also, the dependencies would have been there anyway, and whee do you see the rise of german CO2?
More likely, it would selectively kill or disable a few people, handle its own legal defense, and with its encyclopedic knowledge of the law, maybe even win.
Even more likely, it would consider wiping out humanity an acceptable solution to preventing all violent crime in the future, at a comparatively low cost compared to other solutions.
Which kinda shitty country is that? Nuclear power plant running costs are typically like 3-5% of the construction cost.
Oh, my sweet summer child... :-p One that was lucky enough to have it built for $3000/kW? But, you know, by doubling to EIA's current estimate of US prices of roughly $6000/kW for a new nuclear plant to bring the share of operating costs down, you're not exactly helping yourself to lower the total electricity price - especially considering the TVM.
No solar plants also require maintenance. You need at least to clean the panels once or twice a year and that's if you are in place where it does not snow or rain a lot. Not even assuming inverter losses or other failures. Which do happen.
Yep, you'd think that. And still, having no moving parts, their maintenance is not terribly expensive. Apparently, even in current new German plants, the share of maintenance cost actually is around 12% of the LCOE, and that's after the recent heavy reduction in capital costs.
Virtually everything used to post your comment, from your local computer to the network to the server, was written in C++.
The browser, perhaps. Perl, httpd, the Linux kernel, those are in C.
PHP has been developed for web APIs? Wasn't it developed to serve dynamic web pages?
You clearly have not read a lot about nuclear power. My country's major nuclear power plant's total operating costs have exceeded its construction costs after about thirteen years of operation. Which means that by the time the plant is decommissioned, its construction costs will have constituted about 25% of the total costs. Less if the lifetime is prolonged and/or the maintenance costs increase later in the plant's life. So according to you, 300% of the construction costs are "a tiny fraction of the construction costs"?
Maybe you just mixed it up and got it confused with, for example, solar plants? Those are construction-heavy.
No, solid state means solid state. Like NOT liquid state, nor gaseous state.
As for cost did you know if Germany or California had invested in new Nuclear instead of renewables they would already have a 100% clean electrical grid?
That's a very peculiar argument. You're comparing what should be a mature industry (nuclear) with something that needed to be rapidly developed (wind and solar power), and that meant initially getting not a lot of value for a lot of money, before the prices of the equipment due to industry advances reached the contemporary low levels which makes the old prices irrelevant for both new developments in Germany AND the rest of the world (~100x larger than Germany). And I'm not even sure you're comparing apples and oranges; does your reactor price include lifetime operating costs, or just construction? And what is the exact breakdown of the German costs you're mentioning?
Like this?
Amazing. Four of the six things you mentioned are derived from "tea", and you didn't even notice.
Why would you assume that non-lettuce produce is immune to contamination?
It is a natural insecticide
Ah, *that* is why it's so useful when I'm debugging.
So I ate romaine lettuce and now I am shitting my pants.
You shouldn't have eaten your pants, then.
They just want to stop Google from stealing their content.
And GP already indicated how they should do it.
Doesn't term 'starship' implies interstellar capability?
Does it imply interstellar capability less or more than "astronaut"?
Oh, wait, I've heard something similar before: autopilot.
'Autopilot' implies interstellar capability?
I will convict any fucking pot smoker to the death penalty.
By stoning?
Something blew up *before* he smoked it, so clearly the explosions cause the smoking.
No, it's not, but even if it were ... that's not what "socialism" means.
One of the hallmarks of real-world socialism was full employment (the the attendant criminalization of unemployment), but that often involved something effectively equal to "distributed" public works, in forms of make-work jobs and systemic inefficiencies in state companies.