I'd expect somewhat smarter logic to handle the distribution of the pieces, to ensure maximum availability with minimum storage space wasted globally. Individual torrents don't really know about each other. But it does seem to be aligned with the principle that the more popular a thing is, the more nodes it should be located on.
The point is, it's not "1960s rocket tech" what the Chinese are developing.
BE-4 is ORSC, but the US has always been more interested in making their engines reliable first and high performance second.
Why not have both, like with the RD-180?
The SSME is 2 decades older and has higher ISP at sea level than the YF100 has in vacuum all while having double the thrust and being reusable, is oxidizer rich really intrinsically better?
It doesn't really work that well for hydrocarbons. Either ORSC, or, as you note, FFSC is the way to go.
turbines litter the landscape where they were neither wanted nor economic.
Actually, wind turbines got primarily sited at the most advantageous locations, which is why the following ones will most likely get sited at the same places.
Slashdot Mirror
Coming from
Ha! I see what you did there...
2B or not 2B
In other words, true ?
If you don't care, why the bitching about simulations and speeds?
I'd expect somewhat smarter logic to handle the distribution of the pieces, to ensure maximum availability with minimum storage space wasted globally. Individual torrents don't really know about each other. But it does seem to be aligned with the principle that the more popular a thing is, the more nodes it should be located on.
No Arab country is mentioned as being a signatory to the MTCR.
BE-4 is ORSC, but the US has always been more interested in making their engines reliable first and high performance second.
Why not have both, like with the RD-180?
The SSME is 2 decades older and has higher ISP at sea level than the YF100 has in vacuum all while having double the thrust and being reusable, is oxidizer rich really intrinsically better?
It doesn't really work that well for hydrocarbons. Either ORSC, or, as you note, FFSC is the way to go.
including Presidential alerts from that orange thing
You get French alerts on your phone?
If he's posted it several times he is clearly trying to promote it, not refute it.
Oh, my sweet summer child...
Actually, ORSC engines are NOT "1960's rocket tech" - at least for Americans that still haven't developed theirs.
A browser extension that filters posts, perhaps? That might help.
Go back to your home planet.
Omicron Theta?
15 drops of water.
It sounds much less practical than a larger system connected to a local grid, though.
Also, the Eastern Bloc pre-1989. Your father used to be a small businessman? No college for you!
Communications, remote sensing, emergency services, military applications.
For watering Brazil? What it's doing in the US is a mystery, though.
Partly. The estimates of the costs may not have been accurate every time.
turbines litter the landscape where they were neither wanted nor economic.
Actually, wind turbines got primarily sited at the most advantageous locations, which is why the following ones will most likely get sited at the same places.
Sometimes not even at a reduced capacity.
Thankfully Iâ(TM)ve been using it long enough to be grandfathered into most of the now paid-only features!
Why would an RSS reader have paid-only features? Ohh, I see. It's some kind of web application.
What the hell happened with normal RSS clients?
I want multiple habitable moons around a gas giant - that would be really cool.
Only until the Death Star comes around.
Then you decimate again?
An example, please?
Why not just use youtube-dl like everyone else?
What I think you don't understand is that load can be regulated.