Slashdot Mirror


User: NatasRevol

NatasRevol's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,627
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,627

  1. Re:There's nothing at all wrong with this concept on Microsoft Research Builds 'BrowserShield' · · Score: 1

    By "all", I meant all the (known) bugs that were going to be protected by the shield. If they know about them, they should just damn fix them and not build a separate wall to address them.

    As for script malware, how is the shield going to protect it if they don't know about it in the first place? updates, updates, updates. And always one, two or three steps behind the bad guys. How about having an OS -now- that has a browser in a sandbox, where bad code doesn't affect the system? Why put up with an OS that doesn't have that? Why wait until they hopefully get it partly right, but with new security holes that are just different from the last ones?

    Just an interesting question. What happens if the shield blocks MS updates?

  2. Re:Bye bye karma on Microsoft Research Builds 'BrowserShield' · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, we hate the idea because it's bloody fucking obvious to everyone except Microsoft that they should fix all the vulnerabilites in IE before building a wall around them. In other words, use the shield code to FIX IE.

    Yes, firewalls do this, but you don't see Mailman building a mail shield to protect its vulnerabilities - they fix them. You don't see Firefox building a web shield to protect its vulnerabilites - they fix them. Etc, etc, etc.

    The concept from MS is fine. The implementation, as is typical, is truly horrendous. Insecure layer after insecure layer will hopefully catch some of the bad stuff, but won't truly protect you because it's not built with fundamental security as a principal idea, but as an after thought. Now, you're going to have to update Windows, IE, AND the web shield. One more way to help users...or not.

    But that's just my opinion...

  3. Re:Already been done... on Privacy Web Browser 'Browzar' Branded Adware · · Score: 1

    Safari>Private Browsing

    Doesn't write files in the first place, so there's nothing to delete.

    Very nice.

  4. Re:Backups don't need to be tricky these days on It's 2006 and Backups For Home User Still Tricky? · · Score: 1

    Macs have had this capability for roughly four years now.

  5. Re:Bullshit on No Full HD Playback for 32-bit Vista · · Score: 1

    Well, Apple has an out.

    All of their systems - hardware AND software - will be 64 bit.

    And Tiger is already mostly 64 bit.

  6. Re:the article may have some good points, but... on Windows vs Mac Security · · Score: 1

    Same siituation on OS X client. There is no root account, so it can't log in either.

    Of course, you can sudo su and have a pseudo root account, but that's not a full root login.

  7. Re:All I know is ... on Windows vs Mac Security · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why?

    Why not just put the AV on the Windows box?

    You're just wasting your time & CPU cycles putting it on a box that has no need for it.

  8. Re:well, on Windows vs Mac Security · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, that helped!! Thanks!!

  9. Re:I wonder... on Wozniak to Judge American Idol-Inspired Mac App Contest · · Score: 1

    Heh, I've seen people that can't quite grasp the concept of putting items in their dock. Time Machine is going to be just too far out there for stupids.

  10. Re:I wonder... on Wozniak to Judge American Idol-Inspired Mac App Contest · · Score: 1

    Damn. I like licking 9V batteries :-)

  11. Re:I wonder... on Wozniak to Judge American Idol-Inspired Mac App Contest · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I never get viruses in Mac OS X. Because there aren't any. Yet. Of course, I've been saying that for five years now.

    A couple of trojans, maybe. And of course, they required admin privs. Not much of a trojan there.

    Yes, users will always be able to rm -rf ~. It's their user space, they can do what they want with it. You can't protect people from stupid.

  12. Re:Why did they need a 3rd party card? on Less Than a Minute to Hijack a MacBook's Wireless · · Score: 1

    No, it wasn't.

    Reading your link, search for the comment by rahrens, get answers to the questions and and see if you still think it's an OS X hack.

    Hint, it's not.

  13. Re:Why did they need a 3rd party card? on Less Than a Minute to Hijack a MacBook's Wireless · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sure, that's a fine point.

    BUT THE MACBOOK & OS X ISN'T HACKED. It's a third party card, running a third party driver, and guess what? OS X doesn't have root enabled by default, so I seriously doubt they got root access without changing it.

    I call a LOT of bullshit for making this out to be an Apple issue. Not default hardware, not default wireless settings, not default security settings, but it's still a hack and Apple's fault? Riiight.

  14. Re:Household trick on Easy Fix for Scratched CDs · · Score: 1

    Sugar is the abrasive agent.

  15. Re:Misleading story on Ruling to Make Reporters Act Like Drug Dealers? · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should read it yourself. And in actual context.

    As has been pointed out elsewhere, the press in the Constitution is NOT the Press/4th Estate of today. It was the phyiscal means for representing speech, ie a printing press.

    THERE ARE NO SPECIAL TERMS FOR JOURNALISTS IN THE CONSTITUTION.

    They are only citizens like the rest of us. They can get just as abused by the powers that be as the rest of us. And that is what they should be reporting. Not whining that their mis-interpretation affords them special rights.

  16. Re:Why? on Worst Ever Security Flaw in Diebold Voting Machine · · Score: 1

    Dancing around center???

    Pass me that bottle, it's almost gone!

  17. Re:DRM Creep? on Apple to Announce iTunes Movie Rentals? · · Score: 1

    Would that be slip kid or analog kid? Or maybe you meant New World Man?

  18. Re:Why does everything need to be tech based? on Re-Inventing Hotwheels · · Score: 1

    My 5 yr old just got this as well. It helps a LOT to stabilize not just the track, but the loop as well. You can actually hear the cars going around faster.

    But then, it's not so much fun to just sit there with your hand on the loop, watching cars just go round & round.

  19. Re:The Switch? on The Future of Apple's Pro Desktop Line · · Score: 1

    Why are you saying that Apple discontinued Shake?

    I can buy it right now, and it's available on Mac & Linux. Granted, it's just a wee bit more on Linux...

    http://www.apple.com/shake/

    And they're working on a new version. Yeah, it may not be just a typical upgrade, but it's not being discontinued. I'm guessing it will be Intel only for the speed.
    http://www.capria.tv/2006/06/21/farewell-shake/

  20. Re:Just be careful when clicking the search links. on Virus Trackers Find Malware With Google · · Score: 0

    I'll click on all the damn links I want!! I've got a Mac!!

    Oh, wait, I just got a new MacBook/Parallels/WinXP. Dammit!!

  21. Re:Defenseless? on Want Security? Make The Switch · · Score: 1

    Sure, just help Mom-n-Pop set up a WSUS server AND a private secure network...at each of the ~100 million homes running Windows & updates.

    Office computers are much less of a problem for spreading viruses/trojans/malware than Mom-n-Pop's computer.

    Which is why TFA was posted in the first place.

  22. Re:NYT article on Google Launches PayPal Rival · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Wright 5 dollars"

    Does it have an old plane as the background image??

  23. Re:I RTFA.. on Frozen Chip from IBM hits 500 GHz · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but no. It came with my Sony Erricson T616, I didn't get it anywhere.

  24. Re:I RTFA.. on Frozen Chip from IBM hits 500 GHz · · Score: 4, Funny

    But, but....it's 2.4Ghz!!! They're reeeaaally fast!!

    I can play Qbert on mine, so it must be fast!!

  25. Re:What I expected on Origami Feedback Mixed, says Samsung · · Score: 3, Funny

    But the angles were too hard...