Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches PayPal Rival

Google Checkout Launched Roy van Rijn informs us that Google's new online payment system is now online. "Under the name Checkout, the venture offers an incorporated manner to search, advertise and pay. If you buy something on Checkout, 2% and $0.20 go to Google. Paypal, the biggest competitor uses 1,9% and $0,30. Analysts compare Google/Paypal to for example Visa/Mastercard living peacefully together, while others predict the end of Paypal." W3K adds "You can use your Google account to store an unlimited number of credit cards and addresses. The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place," and adds a link to a quick video tour.

449 comments

  1. End of Paypal ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I'm sure eBay will let that happen.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:End of Paypal ? by grazzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure gBay agrees.

    2. Re:End of Paypal ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just like GMail meant the end of Yahoo Mail, Hotmail, and the myriad of other online mail services. And how Google Maps meant the end of Mapquest andd MS Maps (??). I know that Google has created some welcome competition to many online services, forcing them to improve their offerings, but it hasn't completely killed the competition. Most people I know haven't switched from their current providers. However, I'm sure they would have if Hotmail stuck to 2MB, and Mapquest didn't touch their interface. I'm happy google's here, because it makes everyone else have to try harder. Let's hope the same happens to E-Bay. They haven't changed their interface since their inception.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:End of Paypal ? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, killing an email service is very difficult. Nobody wants to go through the hassle of sending a new e-mail address to everybody they know. So it is expecte that there would be a very slow change on this front.

      But changing their mapping service as well as who they pay through, that is a whole other issue. Mapquest and MSN maps have been losing business. In light of the continual growth of the net, that is very telling. I would guess that Google is not going to kill off paypal tomorrow or over the next 10 years. But I would also bet that paypal will lose more than half of their business within five years and continue a downward trend unless they make a major change. Since ebay has taken over paypal, they have abused stores as well as users. Their attitude may start to change back to what it was.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:End of Paypal ? by grapeape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big difference between paypal vs google and the competing mail services. People have had a choice for years. No one complains about free email its reliable, its there, its ubiquitous. What irritates people with Paypal is the rather random enforcement of buyer and seller protection coupled with their stranglehold on ebay that pretty much makes any other method of payment impossible. After paying listing fees, final value fees, paypal fees, extra paypal fees if you want to be able to take credit cards, and dealing with buyers protection which is in my experience used in scam attempts as much as in real disputes, the ebay/paypal racket is hardly a bargain.

      After all that, I still use it on occasion because I have no choice, thats the difference.

    5. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The difference between 1.9% + 30 cents (ebay) and 2.0% + 20 cents (google) might not strike you as significant, but google now works out to be cheaper for all sales under $100.00

      Don't think that the "ebay power sellers" aren't keenly aware of the difference. They know how ebay nickel-and-dimes them to death, and if they can save a few dollars a week AND stick it to ebay, they will.

      Example - item at $10.00

      eBay: 49 cents, google:40 cents. Difference: 9 cents.

      Do 100/week, and over the course of a year you're looking at $468.00 in savings ...

    6. Re:End of Paypal ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      so what ?

      You, like some other posters, seem to think that PayPal's prices are fixed in stone forever.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:End of Paypal ? by barbazoo · · Score: 1

      ...gAypal?

    8. Re:End of Paypal ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Everybody had a problem with Hotmail before GMail came around. But they thought it was the only service available, and they needed the account anyway to use MSN (I know you can sign up for MSN with another email address, but it's really hard to find that site). Hotmail still has terrible spam filtration (blacklisting everyone except your contacts is not spam filtration), and thankfully, they've gone up from their original 2MB of storage. People used Hotmail because it was there, but I don't think that many people liked it. They were all looking for a change, but It's hard to switch email addresses.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:End of Paypal ? by Andrew+Nagy · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the record, if you (the seller) advertises on Adwords, they give you $10 free transactions for every $1 you spend in Adwords advertising. So if you spend $500 a day on advertising costs, they allow $5,000 worth of sales go through for free.

      --
      Yes, you can dance to Radiohead.
    10. Re:End of Paypal ? by hlh_nospam · · Score: 4, Interesting
      There's nothing wrong with either Ebay or PayPal... that a dose of viable competition wouldn't cure in a heartbeat. PayPal has pissed off enough people that CheckOut is virtually guaranteed to be an immediate success, but probably won't kill PayPal immediately. PayPal will simply clean up its act, which is long overdue. (Thanks, Google!!) As for ebay, they are on the downhill slide anyway. They have grown too big to effectively manage, they have become a fraud magnet, and they are chasing a business model that has some curious shortcomings (most of what is currently sold on Ebay is not really well-suited to the auction format). A combination of GoogleBase and CheckOut will eventually reduce ebay to a footnote in internet history (Something along the lines of, "For those of you that don't remember Ebay, it was once the largest auction/ecommerce site by a factor of more than 10").

      I will be checking out the new CheckOut, with some initial testing in my violin business, and if the results are good, I may move all of my business away from Ebay.

    11. Re:End of Paypal ? by Firehed · · Score: 1
      If/when Google has multiple transaction rates, which are chosen automatically based on the purchase value, they'll completely dominate. You're right - a few cents saved times hundreds of transactions really adds up. I'm just making up numbers here, but if they had a 1.5% + $0.50, 1.75% + $0.40, and 2.0% + $0.20, and it auto-selects the best rate (for the seller, not Google) based on the transaction, they'll have powersellers and other Paypal-accepting merchants switching over incredibly fast. The slight savings for smaller transactions is great for your eBay'ers and small-value stores, but consider places like Newegg or other tech-related stores where you'll often spend well over $100 (or whatever the break-even point is) - they're not going to be switching to Google's service.

      Of course, I'm sure Google's already thought about this, and will probably consider it more seriously when they see what the initial success looks like. In reality they've got nothing to lose by offering the better rates - the more stores that switch (or simply add the option), the more potential revenue for Google.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    12. Re:End of Paypal ? by kabocox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since ebay has taken over paypal, they have abused stores as well as users. Their attitude may start to change back to what it was.

      I'm confused why people ever really use PayPal in the first place. Oh yes because it's "easy." I wouldn't mind Google, MS, or heck even SGI to go into this. My thing is that they should start off as declaring themselves as doing banking and being properly regulated. I want PayPal to die a swift death just because of that. PayPal is doing banking and should be regulated as such. I honestly think that MS, Google, or some other IT company should produce a set of software that makes it as easy as using PayPal for your existing bank to do business over the internet. The big PayPal killer will be when my 4+ local city banks can do business with each other and your local banks as easily as PayPal transactions happen.

    13. Re:End of Paypal ? by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Mapquest and MSN maps have been losing business.

      If they do fold, I sure will miss the interstate exit numbers that Google Maps so helpfully does not provide.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    14. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You, like some other posters, seem to think that PayPal's prices are fixed in stone forever.

      Don't put words in my mouth - I never said that. Here's the reality ...

      1. finally, paypal has some real competition
      2. a lot of people would pay more to switch from paypal
      3. this will shrink ebay's customer base no matter what, so they're going to be hit with both lower demand and lower prices
      4. for google, on the other hand, their market share can only grow - and they've got tie-ins to a lot more stuff than ebay

      Then there's the whole regulatory issue - ebay has had to make deals with regulators in almost 20 states ... google will just go out and BUY a bank. Then they'll issue their own credit cards, etc.

    15. Re:End of Paypal ? by mishkon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paypal is NOT 1.9%. It is likely to be around 2.5% (over $3k in sales a month) or 2.2% (over 10k in sales) dpending on volume. many paypal uses pay around 3%. Google being 2% regardless of volume, makes it significantly cheaper then paypal for most sellers.

    16. Re:End of Paypal ? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      "I'm happy google's here, because it makes everyone else have to try harder. Let's hope the same happens to E-Bay. They haven't changed their interface since their inception."

      Competition is good, but regarding ebay's interface, I think it's fine, myself. Do we really need ebay to change its UI to some ajax/web 2.0 thingamajig?

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    17. Re:End of Paypal ? by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I would be shocked if any of them die. Just because they are losing business does not mean that either is in danger of dieing. The problem is that they did not improve. Of course, now that MS live is out and with a similiar interface to Google, it will probably gain some traction. As to the interstate exit numbers, please send in a request. I no longer own (and very rarely use) a printer, so I have never noticed that. That would be helpful.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:End of Paypal ? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what I was saying. Google coming into the market forces everyone else to clean up their act, but doesn't destroy them completely. Maybe if Paypal didn't react at all, and didn't improve their services, then they may go under. But I don't think they would just let that happen.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:End of Paypal ? by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

      I always thought eBay was just a secret name for an attempt to re-launch Be.

      tone

      --
      tone
    20. Re:End of Paypal ? by Khuffie · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Canada, you can send money through your bank accounts via email, as long as both of you have access to your bank's online banking. Unfortunately it's something not many people know about.

    21. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! What a rip-off.

      Google attacking ebay is a Good Thing (TM).

      Hopefully, they'll take on this next.

    22. Re:End of Paypal ? by lgw · · Score: 1

      The fact that this story *didn't* get a first post from the GNAA over the gAypal thing is a sure sugn that the GNAA is dead. I think the internet can breath a sigh of relief over their passing.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:End of Paypal ? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The thing people like about PayPal is it lets you pay with a credit card. If I buy something using PayPal with a credit card and I don't receive it then one email to my credit card company will see the money returned. I could just as easily send money from my Internet banking site, but then I don't get the buyer protection.

      The US, sadly, has one of the most backwards banking systems I have ever had the misfortune to do business with. Most US banks seem to regard sending money by telegraph as a horrible new-fangled concept, while banks in the EU and Japan have been allowing customers to do it for free for well over a decade. I have two UK bank accounts and one US account. The amount of stuff the US bank seems to think they can get away with charging me for is staggering; they even charge for doing a balance enquiry at a cash machine!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:End of Paypal ? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The difference between 1.9% + 30 cents (ebay) and 2.0% + 20 cents (google) might not strike you as significant, but google now works out to be cheaper for all sales under $100.00
      It doesn't strike me as very significant, and google is more expensive for all sales over $100.

      Frankly I find the writeup curious; first stating that the new google service charges a higher percentage than PayPal, then claiming that some anonymous "others" are predicting the end of PayPayl. And this is google's opening salvo - to just match the entrenched competition? For an occasional user like myself it's not even worth the few minutes it would take to create an account at google. I expected for more.

    25. Re:End of Paypal ? by uioreanu · · Score: 1

      Google uses the Long tail approach, which between others means that they are here to stay.

      --
      cut this signatures madness. stop reading them now!
    26. Re:End of Paypal ? by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      I believe the GP did his math wrong, and that Google is actually cheaper for anything under $10,000 dollars, and by a good margin.
      Regards,
      Steve

    27. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "PayPal is doing banking and should be regulated as such."

      I'm ignorant. So bear with me:

      Can you give clear reasons why you state this?

      Furthermore, don't banks have to report many types of transactions to the federal government/regulatory body directly? Such as large cash withdrawals/payments? Checks over $1,000? iow, if they were regulated as a bank, how would such withdrawals be viewed regarding transfers and purchases, and as such, maybe not subject as directly to federal review?

      Now, I'm not stupid enough to believe PayPal doesn't bend over and hand over info much like parent ebay does when it comes to law enforcement; they probably already provide much of this information on request. But with banks, such reporting is, I believe, mandatory.

    28. Re:End of Paypal ? by TasteeWheat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The thing people like about PayPal is it lets you pay with a credit card. If I buy something using PayPal with a credit card and I don't receive it then one email to my credit card company will see the money returned.

      Sure, you can do that, but then you'll get screwed by Paypal. I had an issue where the seller never shipped the item to me, and I first went through Paypal's dispute option in order to get my money back. However, they were either unable or unwilling to give me a refund, so I disputed the charge with my credit card company. Once Paypal got the chargeback, they permanently froze my service until I paid THEM the amount of my chargeback. Give money back to Paypal for an item I never received, and had just disputed? I don't think so. Needless to say, I haven't used them since (nor will I ever).

    29. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Lets see:

      1.9% of $100.00 is $1.90
      2% of $100.00 is $2.00

      Ebay (1.9% + $0.30) = ($1.90 + $0.30) = $2.20

      Google (2% + $0.20) = ($2.00) + $0.20) = $2.20

      I think my math is right - parity is at $100.00, not $10,000.00

    30. Re:End of Paypal ? by sdiz · · Score: 1
      In Canada, you can send money through your bank accounts via email, as both of you have access to your bank's online banking. Unfortunately it's something not many people know about.
      Yes. If he have access to your online banking,.
    31. Re:End of Paypal ? by wishmechaos · · Score: 1
      and they needed the account anyway to use MSN (I know you can sign up for MSN with another email address, but it's really hard to find that site)
      It's amazing how, quite often, I tell people my MSN Messenger address, they're so amazed it's hosted in my own domain instead of @hotmail.com. Not that it's too hard to find www.passport.com, it's most people don't distinguish between MS Passport and Hotmail.
      Quite funnily, I'd say more than 50% of people around my age (say, 16-25) use gMail, while practically no-one over 30 even knows there's anything beyong Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail.
    32. Re:End of Paypal ? by generic-man · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A coworker was using Windows Live Local, which is really cool if you live in one of the places that have Bird's Eye (TM) maps. Example: a baseball game seen aerially so close you can make out individual players on the field!

      Also cool on Live: traffic, which Google Maps doesn't provide. Ask.com maps is another site that has outdone Google in mapping. Competition is truly good and I thank Google for raising the bar here.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    33. Re:End of Paypal ? by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Australia, they charge you for typing a PIN incorrectly.

      They had to dig deep for this charge as they have already been charging for everything else for years.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    34. Re:End of Paypal ? by sshore · · Score: 2, Informative
      In Canada, you can send money through your bank accounts via email, as long as both of you have access to your bank's online banking. Unfortunately it's something not many people know about.


      It's several dollars per transaction, and it's not offered by all banks. It's no replacement for Paypal et al.
    35. Re:End of Paypal ? by RDW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that in at least some countries this only applies until you reach your lifetime 'sending limit' (read the small print). Once this limit is reached (I think this is $2000 in the US, but only £500 at most in the UK) you have to give PayPal direct access to a bank account, losing the 'insulation' provided by your credit card. This is the thing I hate most about PayPal, and they aren't exactly up-front about it either (the help information about account 'verification' just has some vague language about the supposed benefits to the buyer, and nothing about the very real advantages to PayPay of being able to suck cash straight out of your bank account).

    36. Re:End of Paypal ? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      That's a little bit harder than just writing a check. Ask Walmart.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    37. Re:End of Paypal ? by misxn · · Score: 1

      Well eBay's interface works well which is why it hasn't changed much in the traditional sense. However, factually speaking, Google's interface has changed since inception. I know you were just exaggerating but just look at the two: Inception: http://web.archive.org/web/19970614001443/http://w ww.ebay.com/ Current: http://www.ebay.com/

    38. Re:End of Paypal ? by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Paypal also has fees, somewhere between $0.30 + 1.9% to 2.9% depending on how you are set up with them. For larger transactions, it doesn't seem as competitive. And remember... not everyone has Paypal either.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    39. Re:End of Paypal ? by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      but it hasn't completely killed the competition.
      They're waiting for gChair.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    40. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also costs $5 fee for the sender in additional to your bid price. So you are welcomed to pay the bid price (which has the % factored in the buy it now or start bid) and pay again to your bank.

      Paypal on the other hand hides that from you and would be cheap for $100 purchases. I still have the final say on paypal with the help of my credit card company. The bank transaction do not have even a contract in place for what the sender is transfering the money for.

    41. Re:End of Paypal ? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      "PayPal is doing banking and should be regulated as such."

      I'm ignorant. So bear with me:

      Can you give clear reasons why you state this?

      Actually, PayPal is operating in loop hole verse like check cashing services do to avoid usry charges. Banks can't charge excessive interest that check cashing services do. I'm not familiar with all the ins and outs of the loop hole that allows PayPal to operate without being regulated without being a bank. Why should they be though? My first response to that is all those complaints against PayPal for freezing accounts and not doing business as most people expect well if they were properly regulated they'd beat up by the FDIC and other federal orgs after enough compliants. Oh, what am I thinking this is the US. Our banking system charges more fees than than our phone companies do. If the US Banks ran the ISPs, they'd charge you by bandwidth, time usage, and per hyperlinks clicked. I don't know why I want PayPal "regulated" other than "it should" help consumers with complaints against PayPal. I don't know if that'd actually happen even if they were "regulated" though.

    42. Re:End of Paypal ? by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

      damn, nobody I know even blinked at my non-hotmail msn address, maybe they think i have super powers or something.

    43. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart filed an application with state regulators in April to buy Franklin Bank of California, an industrial bank with $2.5 million in assets and three employees in Orange County. The new law prohibits non-financial firms from buying state-chartered banks.
      That was small potatoes.

      If they come to Canada, they can start their own bank as long as they can show $5,000,000.00 in capital. http://lois.justice.gc.ca/en/B-1.01/index.html

      They could even turn it into a political football by locating in either one of the Atlantic provinces (needed investment) or Nunavut (native investment). Setting up in one of the Atlantic provinces would have about 40 MPs and 8 senators behind it right away.

    44. Re:End of Paypal ? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Google is now a credit card processor. What in the world makes you think they have any incentive to, in your own words, "go out and BUY a bank"?! Is there really that much value involved in using a JavaScript BETA ATM to get your GoogleMoney to spend at the GoogleMall?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    45. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they, or anyone, thinks that.

    46. Re:End of Paypal ? by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once heard a joke about how, "One day, you'll drive your Sony to the Sony to buy more Sony for your Sony".

      We need a new one that goes, "One day, you'll Google for some more Google for your Google, and pay Google with Google"

    47. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be a very dangerous move for google.
      Paypal can go after this as monopolistic practice.

    48. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anawrahta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's available to all the chartered Canadian banks. And the cost is $1.50 for any transfer up to $1000 (which is the 24 hour limit). It is FAR cheaper than Paypal or Google Checkout. 2% vs. 1% on any transfer over $150

    49. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Even if they save only 1 cent per transaction, we're talking million and millions of dollars.

      Plus, they can then move into financing big-ticket items. "Buy this car. Get financing at the same time! Click."

      Banks, second-chance lenders., etc., pay car dealers a kickback of between $345.00 and $800.00 for sub-prime loans on cars. (They also kick back several hundred on prime-rate car loans). Get the customer to sign at x%, get $345.00 Get them to sign at x+5%, get back 640. etc...

    50. Re:End of Paypal ? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      As a search engine and ad broker, what makes Google qualified to do this? You don't even know how competent they are at taking money, considering how unwilling they are to part with it (see all the webmasters whose accounts were mysteriously frozen for nebulous "click fraud").

      --
      For more information, click here.
    51. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gMONEY Bitzatch

    52. Re:End of Paypal ? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      And then Google goes after eBay for monopolistic practices.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    53. Re:End of Paypal ? by sshore · · Score: 1
      Actually it's available to all the chartered Canadian banks. And the cost is $1.50 for any transfer up to $1000 (which is the 24 hour limit). It is FAR cheaper than Paypal or Google Checkout. 2% vs. 1% on any transfer over $150


      Interesting. I don't suppose this includes Credit Unions, does it?

      Where to find more information on this? What's it called? I used to have a roommate that paid his share of rent through a similar service, but it was $3-$5, iirc.
    54. Re:End of Paypal ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      1. They can hire the best brains in the business, and turn them loose. Not something that equifax or transunion is going to do.
      2. The googleplex will have a lot more info from which to draw a profile.
    55. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail is by invitation only. How can it ever be meant to "kill" Yahoo mail if the average Yahoo user can't even sign up on Gmail, much less give up using Yahoo?

    56. Re:End of Paypal ? by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Who does? Westpac certainly doesn't.

    57. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brazil you can instantly send money to any bank account on any place in the country if the transaction is above R$ 5,000.00 (about U$ 2,100.00). For smaller payments you can send any amount and the destination will receive it arround midnight.

      But like the guy in Greece, its incredible hard to receive small donations in money from foreign countries. Its also very hard to get a credit card merchant account, and its very expensive and hard to constitute and run a business. It sucks hard, otherwise I could quit my job and survive working over internet solving issues or collecting bounties for FOSS features.

      Today somepeople express their gratitude sending me books from my amazon list (books dont pay any fees), but I cant survive from books.

    58. Re:End of Paypal ? by eggsome · · Score: 1

      Which bank are you with? I've never been charged for this. I've used the Commonwealth for the past few years and before that credit unions.

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    59. Re:End of Paypal ? by ecj+-+MAXINE · · Score: 1

      Google believes that it has the answer for the convenience of online shopping with its release of its new service - Google Checkout. eBay's PayPal and Microsoft's former attempt at streamlining the online checkout process, Passport, have tried to address the security and convenience concerns of retailers and buyers alike, but neither have been able to make the processes deliver sales at the end of the shopping experience. Google is banking on the trust built through owning the private information of the online shopper and insuring its privacy, they can deliver valuable purchasing information to retailers so that the retailer can market more directly to its potential target market. What is the convenience to the online shopper? To be able to purchase online as if one had a "Mobile SpeedPass", in that the shopper would not need to enter private purchasing information for every shopping experience at every online retailer. The rub is this -- Can shoppers trust Google to treat the information and its potential monopolistic power with a strong enough respect over time? There lay many strong temptations to play with this information and its collective power to the detriment of the user of the service.

    60. Re:End of Paypal ? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a difference in percentages, but you can't compare them straight across in percentages because the Google system requires you to buy advertising via AdWords. PayPal has no such requirement, they just deal with percentages. So if you're a zero-cash start-up, like me, I don't want to buy AdWords.

      In effect, I'm buying my own discount. Whether or not the purchase of AdWords would increase my sales is a subject of debate, not of immediate and obvious benefit.

      I have a small game company called Spare Brains Games, the shoestring upon which it runs is so thin that AdWords is not a possibility. I'm advertising strictly through a large number of friends and gaming communities to which I belong.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    61. Re:End of Paypal ? by aevans · · Score: 1

      I think the point is, that Paypal set the bar pretty low.

    62. Re:End of Paypal ? by Anawrahta · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't think it supports credit unions, however it wouldn't hurt to ask.

      The website is http://www.certapay.com/

      I believe the service is called Interac Email Money Transfer, and coincidentally I get my roommates to pay me using it as well due to its low cost.

    63. Re:End of Paypal ? by MickoZ · · Score: 1

      Send money by email's fees is on the sender (client?) as far as I know.

      Paypal's fee are on the receiver (seller?).

      It is quite a lot of difference.

      I think a seller is usually more willing accept some fees (even if a lot would prefer to not pay) to conclude a sale. All store accepting credit card probably pays some fees (wal-mart, your grocery store, amazon, etc.) -- chance are they often do more money accepting it, even if there is some fees.

      Even if the seller was offering a rebate for some kind-of payment, I will believe (ok, it is a fast hypothesis) that psychologically, a client that has to pay something more for a service will be stop (even if it gives him the same price at the end). Of course it depends of the client, but it is a guess of normal behavior of people that look up at fee.

      Personaly I would have used "send money by mail" locally, but paying 1-2$ for sending 30-40$ is non-sense for a cheap bastard like me (especially when I can easily save the 1-2$). So the idea rocks, in practice the price they set did not seem good enough for me. But if they change the fees (or if it become an almost free service) -- that might kick ass.

      A good price? It should at less cost less than a stamp. At less for very small transaction fees.

    64. Re:End of Paypal ? by MickoZ · · Score: 1

      2.9% + $0.30 USD (0-3k$ of transaction)
      2.5% + $0.30 USD (3k-10k$ of transaction)
      2.2% + $0.30 USD (10k-100k$ of transaction)
      1.9% + $0.30 USD (100k$+ of transaction)

      https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display -receiving-fees-outside&countries=

      Of course, that is maybe legitimate to charge when it is from credit card, but they can do way better when the money doesn't come from credit card (they can, but still their business model take advantage of this and it is one choice like another, if people are paying...)

      I would like to get a good mainstream micro-payment service, please.

  2. NYT article by ems2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NYT times also has a interesting article on this with quotes about Google's plans on what they want to do with this product.

    1. Re:NYT article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see that only online shopping occurs by US residents.

        By agreeing to this Terms of Service for Buyers, you represent that you are:

              * 18 years old or older;
              * capable of entering into a legally binding agreement; and
              * a resident of the United States.

    2. Re:NYT article by novus+ordo · · Score: 3, Funny
      "The goal here is to make it be one nanosecond from the time the customer decides to buy to the time the transaction is complete and the product is on the way," Mr. Schmidt said.
      Impulsive shopping here we come!
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    3. Re:NYT article by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      Especially because you can select a very broad range of countries from a drop-down box when typing in your delivery address. On the other hand, I dont remember checking a box labeled "I agree to these terms and services".

    4. Re:NYT article by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wright 5 dollars"

      Does it have an old plane as the background image??

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:NYT article by alexmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably the last thing I want is to "use payment and shipping information they keep on file with Google" (quote from TFA). Keep my info in vast searchable financial database which makes it attractive to black hats and goverment?

      No thanks , I'd prefer to spend a minute to create one-off credit card number each time I shop.

    6. Re:NYT article by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Does the NYT Times have a WWW Web page?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    7. Re:NYT article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%
      Can you please elaborate on how you create this one-off CC n# ?

    8. Re:NYT article by Tal+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Wrong: it's not "one nanosecond" from seeing the product, it's "one nanosecond" from the decision to buy. Take as long as you need to decide.

      --
      - Tal Cohen
    9. Re:NYT article by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Probably the last thing I want is to "use payment and shipping information they keep on file with Google" (quote from TFA). Keep my info in vast searchable financial database which makes it attractive to black hats and goverment? No thanks , I'd prefer to spend a minute to create one-off credit card number each time I shop.

      Point taken, but you have to realize that you, like the vast majority of us, are of absolutely no interest to the government's secretive minions. Face it, our lives are for the most part not like that of James Bond. We're dull. That Visa or MasterCard logo already ensures that all your transactions are in a central database anyway-- a much better one than Google could ever have, too. The only thing you're preventing is potential credit card fraud. That's a worthwhile goal in itself.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:NYT article by sootman · · Score: 3, Funny

      One nanosecond? But I want it NOW!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    11. Re:NYT article by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Face it, our lives are for the most part not like that of James Bond. We're dull.

      Sure, you're dull right up until the moment you're not. And then you're defenseless. There is an old saying in Chess - the threat is better than the execution. Meaning that as long as your opponent has the power to do something, you have to expend your efforts in worrying about it and preventing it rather than doing what you'd like to do. If all of your "secrets" are laid bare at the whim of someone in power then you are oppressed - even if nothing actually happens to you. And everybody has secrets, especially when they can be skillfully twisted to present a certain picture.

    12. Re:NYT article by RedOregon · · Score: 1
      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    13. Re:NYT article by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I had the same reservations at first. There's all this worry on Slashdot about keeping your private information private...

      But I let Google track my internet usage and stuff. I let them give me ads based off the text in my e-mails. Now I'm letting them track my online purchases as well as keep my credit card information on file. I can't think of anything more private than my credit card information besides my sexual history. And unlike the others, they have access to all of this information together, allowing them to build a file on me from multiple sources.

      I'm letting Google have this information but I'm all paranoid about giving any of it out to other companies or websites, even the major ones. I'm not sure why I've let Google become an exception.

      It sounds naive in my head, it looks even more naive as I type this...but I guess I trust Google? They're just another profit-maximizing company like all the others, that do-no-evil phrase doesn't mean jack-diddly since it's so general with no self-regulating qualifications on that line. Nothing stops them from just throwing that line out and screwing me like any other company.

      But for some reason, I want to give them the benefit of the doubt even though I know I shouldn't. Probably due in part to my youth. Part of my mind is aware that I'm bent over with my pants around my ankles, but I'm willing to do this only because it's Google standing behind me.

    14. Re:NYT article by wstfgl · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow's News: "Amazon sues Google for breaching their patent on 'buying things quickly on the web'."

  3. paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at eBay by joe545 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter how much I dislike PayPal, I'm forced to use it if I want to buy something from eBay. Until GoogleCheckout tries to break PayPal's monopoly at eBay (it surely can't be legal) I can't see the demise of PayPal happening. This isn't the beginning of the end but the end of the beginning.

  4. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1-9% or 1,9% or 1.9%? Is there a specific price where Paypal is cheaper?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1-9% or 1,9% or 1.9%? Is there a specific price where Paypal is cheaper?

      Uh, .30 + 1.9%x = .20 + 2.0%x, so .10 = .001x, or x = $100

      So up to $100, Google is cheaper, above $100 Paypal is cheaper.

    2. Re:Huh? by tiltowait · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe the comma in lieu of a period in a European thing. Kinda looks pretentious, but submitter has a .nl address. Not the best copy edit to use them interchangeably however.

      My math says that Google would be cheaper for anything over $100.

    3. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ignorant bastard... probably American!

    4. Re:Huh? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kinda looks pretentious,

      It doesn't look pretentious if you're European, it looks normal. There is a world outside the evil empire! I will, however, agree that one shouldn't mix standards.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    5. Re:Huh? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Right crossover point, but you got it backward.

      PayPal is cheaper for anything over $100.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    6. Re:Huh? by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      My math says that Google would be cheaper for anything over $100.

      You live in the Bizarro World, don't you? I guess the moderator does too.

    7. Re:huh? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Different locales do things differently, I imagine the submitter is European.

    8. Re:huh? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Different parts of the world use different symbols for numeric representations, comma is used as a decimal separator in sme locales, I suspect that it is in The Netherlands, where apparently the submitter comes from. He probably just typed it in the second time out of habit, the rates for Google perhaps he copy and pasted, or specifically remembered he's talking to a predominatly American audience.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    9. Re:Huh? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Odd, my maths says Google would be cheeper for anything under $100.

      Buy why O' why no micropayments, wake me up when they have a 10% + $0 option.

    10. Re:Huh? by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      Yes. 0.019x + 0.3 0.02x + 0.2. Solve for x.

    11. Re:Huh? by bheer · · Score: 1

      If you're an European writing in English for an international audience, it's not pretentious OR normal, it's moronic and stupid. Chinese and Indians writing in English for international audiences routinely use the correct form, why shouldn't Europeans?

    12. Re:Huh? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      use the correct form

      And there you have it. Who says that the US method is the correct form. Whilst English is generally accepted as the international language of science it, and it's conventions, are not correct, they're the convention. Given that US technicians have problems deciding whether to work in SI or Imperial, I wouldn't be quite so quick to talk about 'the correct form'. Oh, and personal abuse diminishes you, not me.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    13. Re:Huh? by lgw · · Score: 1

      We have the biggest army, therefore ours is the standard. It's no different from an international standards committee where one vendor has most of the market share. Firepower ultimately decides most things.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Huh? by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      So when the Chinese overtake in 50 years time, you'll be quite happy accepting their standards. And if you don't think they'll catch up and overtake, then neither did we Brits 100 years ago, or the Romans 1600 years ago.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    15. Re:Huh? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, I may not be happy, any more than I am with the way that international standards committees work, but I'll recognize the inevitability of it.

      OTOH, I doubt the Chinese will be surpassing our military might in just 50 years. Unless, of course, we follow the Brits and just abandon ours (not that colonialism was really working out so well, but the military decline following it's abandonment wasn't much of a surprise).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Rubbber You're Glue -- Ineffective against verbal assaults for over 50 years.

      Now available in adult strength Diminish Me Diminish You.

      Get yours today!

    17. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't look pretentious if you're European, it looks normal.

      Typical pretentious European sentiment.

    18. Re:Huh? by bheer · · Score: 1

      > Who says that the US method is the correct form.

      I didn't say use commas for digit grouping and periods for decimal points when writing in a hypothetical US-specific language. The accepted form in *English* -- the language -- is commas and periods (with the commas substitutable by spaces if you so wish, esp in .uk and .au) . I don't care if the writer is an European or an Orang-otan, if they're writing in English they should use the corect form. I would likewise expect correct form from an English speaker (American or otherwise) if they were writing in German or French.

      If you're too dim to differentiate the US and English, it's not really my problem.

      > Oh, and personal abuse diminishes you, not me.

      I described a style of writing as moronic, not you specifically. Perhaps you ought to brush up on your reading comprehension? On the other hand, if you're the sort who writes like that, you're definitely a moron. Or perhaps a cretin.

  5. Good for the customers by BigDuke6_swe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's hope there won't be a need to create more sites like this, http://www.paypalsucks.com/. Because Paypal works pretty good and what seems to be what people complain the most about is the poor handling of fraud and disputes.

    --
    Zere vere zwei peanuts valking down der Straße, and von vas assaulted...peanut
    1. Re:Good for the customers by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to get a direct answer from PayPal about a policy question?

      It literally took me two months of dealing with stock replies to get an answer to why they forbid payment for certain legal items.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Good for the customers by LMacG · · Score: 1

      How is poor handling of fraud and disputes "work[ing] pretty good"?

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    3. Re:Good for the customers by flatcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, I actually asked PayPal a policy question once on their defination on gambling. It seems that a website that has a contest that pays in PayPal payments constitute gambling, even though there is no cost for entry. But both PayPal and Ebay have had contests that pay in PayPal payments and this is not gambling. I asked them for a clarification on this and the promptly suspended my account and froze my money for "violation of TOS". An example: Here.

    4. Re:Good for the customers by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I asked them a question through email about why it is that they forbid users to purchase firearms via the service. They said that I needed to be logged in to ask such a question. I responded that if they REALLY needed me to, I'd create a new ID and ask through that one because there was no way in the world I'd let them know what my PayPal ID really was so that they could suspend me for asking too many questions.

      In the end I had to create a new ID and trade emails for another month and a half.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  6. Does it work without javascript? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Paypal and ebay do, just not very well. If this google thing works well without js, I'm closing my paypal account.

    1. Re:Does it work without javascript? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems not, it refuses to accept my password or expiration date and I thought google was supposed to employ smart people :-/

    2. Re:Does it work without javascript? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Javascript is just part of the web. Deal with it.

  7. monopoly at eBay by giorgiofr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Monopoly? I can accept payments in about 3615 different ways on eBay. What are you talking about?

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
    1. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Name 412 of them.

    2. Re:monopoly at eBay by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people have no idea what a money order is, although they are sometimes the best means of paying on EBay and cost less than . People seem to think that they can only pay through PayPal.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    3. Re:monopoly at eBay by SYRanger · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet you don't accept African Express.

    4. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the system where they take your bank details and they do all the rest ?

    5. Re:monopoly at eBay by matt328 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you can, but how many of those will be as fast and secure as ebay makes paypal?

      --
      Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    6. Re:monopoly at eBay by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Paying by wire transfer is the cheapest way of paying, since it is completely free (unless you live in a part of the world with an archaic banking system). If you do this, however, you have exactly zero buyer protection. If you pay by credit card through PayPal, then you have a significant amount of protection. It just takes one email to your credit card company and they will reverse the transaction. It then becomes PayPal's problem to get the money back from the seller.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:monopoly at eBay by guinsu · · Score: 1

      Actually, as of 2 years ago, it was Discover card's policy that they would not reverse any transactions through eBay or Paypal. I tried fighting with them over a fraudulent seller but they wouldn't budge.

    8. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably less risky than PayPal then...

    9. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Why not? There's this nice Nigerian guy who offered to give me millions of dollars if... :-)

    10. Re:monopoly at eBay by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend getting a new credit card provider then. Egg recently agreed to reverse a PayPal payment for a friend of mine who hadn't heard anything from a seller for two weeks. The day after they agreed, she got the item she'd ordered through the post, and so had to tell them not to reverse it, but they were quite willing to do so.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:monopoly at eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fry: $30? I can't afford that. Unless... Do you take Visa?
      Salesman: Visa hasn't existed for 500 years.
      Fry: American Express?
      Salesman: 600 years.
      Fry: Discover card?
      Salesman: Sorry, we don't take Discover.

    12. Re:monopoly at eBay by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Odd, within the past year I bought a $100 item that didn't ever appear. I reversed the charges through Discover and didn't have any problems getting my money back. Maybe they re-reversed their policy. And I usually read my agreements pretty well. I haven't seen anything about protections being lessened for some merchants. Any policy that's in disagreement with the Terms and Conditions I have agreed to is not a good policy.

  8. Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My biggest question is if I can use my checkout funds to pay for stuff. I live in Greece, so I can't withdraw PayPal funds (cheaply, anyway), but I can use it to pay for my hosting/online shopping. If I can't do this with Google Checkout, it's all but useless to me.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Money transfers? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't worry. If the availability of things like Google Maps and Google Video are any indicator, Google Checkout will be available in Europe somewhere around 2008.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:Money transfers? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > If the availability of things like Google Maps and Google Video are any indicator, Google Checkout
      > will be available in Europe somewhere around 2008.

      I'm in the UK and Google Maps has been working just fine here for at least a year.

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=downing+st reet,+london&ie=UTF8&ll=51.500381,-0.124454&spn=0. 00156,0.005407&t=h&om=1

    3. Re:Money transfers? by mgblst · · Score: 3, Funny

      Larry Page: Alright everybody, I have some bad news for you.
      Staff: What is it Larry?
      Larry: Apparently the new Gpay system is no good to some guy in Greece, so scrap it.
      Staff: Oh no, all that work for nothing.
      Larry: Yeah, I know, but what can you do. Guys, I am heading back to the Garage.

      Just kidding, really, your opinion is important to us!

    4. Re:Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Learn the difference between "Gpay is useless" and "Gpay is useless to me". I would pay for your English lessons, if I could use Gpay to transfer funds from Greece.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    5. Re:Money transfers? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Umm yes, the point was that google maps existed for almost two years as US only. So if google checkout does the same it could be 2008. Probably not.

    6. Re:Money transfers? by Gwyneth_Llewelyn · · Score: 1

      Is Google Checkout available on any country but the US? I live in Portugal, and Google Checkout seems to insist that any valid address I type is set to "United States" (a fixed field which is impossible to change). Also, at the first step of the registration, valid US business IDs are necessary. The terms of service also seem to preclude anything but an US-registered company.

      FYI this blog seems to have reached the same conclusion: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=244

      With 70% of Internet commerce being outside the US, is this move by Google so clever? I would assume that most people living far away from PayPal's HQ in the US, who never receive a reply from their customer support just because they're not US customers, would flood the gates to get a valid Google Checkout account...

      - Gwyn

      --
      "I'm not building a game. I'm building a new country." -- Philip "Linden" Rosedale, interview to Wired, 2004-05-08
    7. Re:Money transfers? by Gumph · · Score: 1

      No need.

      From the Greek Post above:
      My biggest question is if I can use my checkout funds to pay for stuff. I live in Greece, so I can't withdraw PayPal funds (cheaply, anyway), but I can use it to pay for my hosting/online shopping. If I can't do this with Google Checkout, it's all but useless to me.

      maybe he should pay for your reading lessons!

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    8. Re:Money transfers? by space_dude_27 · · Score: 1

      Umm yes, the point was that google maps existed for almost two years as US only

      Two years as US only? How long has it been around? I was under the impression that it launched in 2005: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Maps/ and within a few months there was coverage of the UK and Canada if this Register article is anything to go by: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/29/google_bus h_map/. They added coverage of most of Western Europe within the last few months. Now, point taken, it was probably an annoyingly long wait if you *really* wanted Google Maps to cover the area where you live (and it even more frustrating if your country isn't yet covered...) but be fair, it hasn't even been around for two years yet.

    9. Re:Money transfers? by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Recently stuff offered to USA and Canada only has started bothering people as they see it as a way of "We don't give a f to you" attitude.

      For example I know it is not only Apple to blame but iTunes Greece store existing and there is no iTunes Turkey store while countries has similar markets (wonder where enemy brothers term come from?) makes you think like "Oh well, Apple doesn't give a heck to our country" and get eMusic.com subscription.

      Same goes for Rhapsody of Real Networks.; You see story on Slashdot, immediately click the URL with a list of rare stuff you have in your mind, you see "Available to USA only". It is like you go to a store and a bodyguard pushes you out because where you live.

      I hope I could explain the background of "Why not available to my country?!" types of postings a bit.

      btw, I know it is RIAA to blame for those "music" stores.

    10. Re:Money transfers? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Your right it was only a year (announced Feb 8th added UK in January), sorry. But remember in internet time thats like 20 years.

    11. Re:Money transfers? by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      With 70% of Internet commerce being outside the US, is this move by Google so clever?

      That means that 30% of all Internet commerce is conducted under one set of laws (U.S.) What is the second biggest chunk of Internet commerce that is able to be conducted under one set of laws? Maybe Japan with 8% (totally made-up number, just asking)?

      It seems that the EU member countries have their own legal, financial, commerce, and privacy laws that mean that Google cannot create a single service that can operate in the EU.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    12. Re:Money transfers? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I'm in Germany and Google Maps have only very recently started containing anything but low-res satellite pictures. I think I'm still occasionally getting the "Google Video is not supported for your country yet" error.
      They're getting there, but they are taking their time.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    13. Re:Money transfers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your point exactly was...what?
      Retard.

    14. Re:Money transfers? by stg · · Score: 1
      Learn the difference between "Gpay is useless" and "Gpay is useless to me". I would pay for your English lessons, if I could use Gpay to transfer funds from Greece.


          Actually, the funny dialogue never implied you said that. It just tried to say through hyperbole that Google isn't likely to care if minor merchants in other countries can't use their service because they can't pay for stuff directly.

          And if you look carefully at their site (VERY carefully - it's not that easy to find), you might note that don't even accept merchants from outside the US now.

          Anyway, I doubt they will go the Paypal way - behaving like a bank - any time soon. It's just a Google CC service, which happens to keep the user CC numbers.
    15. Re:Money transfers? by ender- · · Score: 1

      Recently stuff offered to USA and Canada only has started bothering people as they see it as a way of "We don't give a f to you" attitude.

      For example I know it is not only Apple to blame but iTunes Greece store existing and there is no iTunes Turkey store while countries has similar markets...

      I hope I could explain the background of "Why not available to my country?!" types of postings a bit.

      btw, I know it is RIAA to blame for those "music" stores.


      I'm sure it also has nothing to do with the complicated legal issues with doing business in a billion different countries. Perhaps Turkey has a law that make it difficult or expensive to do that type of business, and some merchants decide that it isn't worth the trouble?

    16. Re:Money transfers? by wingsofchai · · Score: 1
      Learn the difference between "Gpay is useless" and "Gpay is useless to me". I would pay for your English lessons, if I could use Gpay to transfer funds from Greece.
      That is a good idea, but you should also pay for your own. There is a big glaring comma splice in there. Have fun in class!
      --
      Reading at high threshold levels is group-think.
    17. Re:Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      Good observation. Now repeat. In Greek this time.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    18. Re:Money transfers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is no spoon.. uh, Comma Splice.

      subordinating conjunction

      Solution 4: Use a subordinating conjunction.
      Subordinating conjunctions are similar to coordinating conjunctions in that they allow you to indicate the logical relationship between two independent clauses. However, unlike coordinating conjunctions, subordinating conjunctions lay unequal stress on the two parts of the new sentence. We can use the subordinating conjunction although to solve our comma splice problem, and we can do so in two distinct ways

      I completed my essay, although I have not submitted it.
      Although I completed my essay, I have not submitted it.

      As the word subordinating suggests, we place less stress on the clause introduced by the subordinating conjunction. In the first example, the fact that I have not submitted the essay appears as an afterthought; in the second example, it is the point.

      There are a great many subordinating conjunctions in the English language. Here are a few of the more common ones:

      while, although, because, if, since, unless, whether, when, why, as, before, after, if, whether, that, once

    19. Re:Money transfers? by wingsofchai · · Score: 1

      I never criticized anyone in Greek. You did criticize someone about English.

      --
      Reading at high threshold levels is group-think.
    20. Re:Money transfers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This coming from
      someone who lies
      in their sig
      about the product
      they are selling.
      Hint for you.
      500 MB Bandwidth
      not equal to
      unlimited you jerk

    21. Re:Money transfers? by Mozo · · Score: 1

      Ε‘χετε τν ....

      Wiseacre.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= John Reinert Nash -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    22. Re:Money transfers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not really, actually DMG -did- start negotiations with apple about iTMS.

      what came out was a the crappy muzi player though :S

    23. Re:Money transfers? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

      You criticized my English, so I assume that you write Greek as well as I write English.

      --
      Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    24. Re:Money transfers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You english is fine. There was no comma splice. You properly used a subordinate conjunction. Ignore the criticizing fool.

  9. Credit Card Replacement? by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I watched the video.. didn't RTFA though. Does anyone think this it is weird that google is advertising this as a replacement for credit cards?

    Paypal markets itself as a "safe" alternative for things like ebay, and easier to use for things like donations and small online stores that might not be able to use credit card facilities. Yet google is advertising this as a replacement for credit cards on all of your purchases. Would you be prepared to pay 2% on every single purchase you made at an online store just so you don't have to "fill out forms"? This seems silly to me at best.

    I can't imagine ever using paypal for any real purchase. This sort of thing should only be needed for small and unsafe purchases.

    Also, considering how long it took paypal to have Australian checking account support, I'm not going to hold my breathe on Google!

    1. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by BugDoomBug · · Score: 1

      There was an article?

    2. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by ElBeano · · Score: 1

      Actually, the 2% is less than what most merchants effectively give up when they receive purchases by cc. Here, the buyer pays. Trust me, merchants will be happy to favor a system where the buyer pays for processing the transaction, as long as the Google system is as fair to them as the terms of their merchant acct (not too hard at all).

    3. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by ubergenius · · Score: 1

      How much does it cost to use Google Checkout?

      It's free! You'll only be responsible for paying for your purchases, including taxes and delivery fees (if applicable). You won't be charged any additional costs for making a purchase through Google Checkout.

      ---------------

      It seems like it will be, in traditional Google form, free. No fees.

      --
      Student Manager - Take control of your education!
    4. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Would you be prepared to pay 2% on every single purchase you made at an online store just so you don't have to "fill out forms"? This seems silly to me at best.

      I would pay 2% on evry single purchase made if it means that I don't have to own a credit card. I occasionally order stuff overseas (e.g. at Thinkgeek). Since for some reason I can't make a standard EU bank transfer to a bank outside the EU and the USA seem reluctant to become an EU member, ordering anything overseas usually means having to use a credit card.
      (And yes, even when using Paypal I have to provide a CC no. as for some reason they can't take money out of my account when I'm ordering something overseas. Making donations overseas works fine, though.)

      I'm a student and I certainly don't have the money to pay for a credit card that I use about twice a year. Sure, I have relatives I can tunnel the payment through, but that adds additional delays and is only really worth it when I'm making a big payment. Paying 2% extra would make sense for small payments. At least more than paying for a credit card I don't need.

      If Google GiveUsYourMoney works like PayPal but without requiring a credit card for most interesting transactions I'm all for it.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by linvir · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Buyers just won't be able to see the cost.

    6. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe doesn't have credit cards without fees? How can you not afford a credit card?

    7. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by mintsauce4096 · · Score: 1

      You *already* pay this 2% when you buy anything on a credit card. As some others have stated. The exact amount depends on what the store has negoatated with its merchant bank. If you look at many receipts (here in the UK anyway), you see things like (ASDA example) you agree that 2% of the transaction will go to ASDA card services ltd but the price you pay remains the same.

      In these cases you should be demanding that if you pay cash you get a 2% reduction!

    8. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I'm a student and I certainly don't have the money to pay for a credit card that I use about twice a year.

      I am interested as to where you live. In the UK, I can't think of a single credit card company that charges you for just having a card. I've had one since my eighteenth birthday, just over six years ago, and never had to pay anything for the privilege. I have saved a considerable amount by having one, since I get 1% cash back on all purchases (including things that are claimed back as expenses) and I get to pay for things between two and six weeks after I actually bought them, meaning that the money is sitting in my bank account for longer earning interest.

      The only reason a credit card will cost you money is if you don't pay off the balance every month.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      There probably are, but all I know of have strings attached. My bank offers a free credit card, but only with an upgraded giro account, which comes at 4 EUR/month, has an interest rate of 0.00% and doesn't have free bank transfers. My current giro has 0 EUR/month, an interest rate of 1% and free transactions. I'm not insane enough to give that away for a Mastercard.
      Another bank offers me a credit card with twelve months free of charge (from then 5 EUR/year) - provided I sign up with one of their advanced giros. That one doesn't cost money, but the online banking works via mTAN (TANs are sent to the user via SMS on demand; I very much prefer plain smartcard HBCI) and the bank doesn't even state the interest rate, which I presume to be somewhere below 0.0001%.

      Quite honestly, what am I supposed to do with a credit card? Over here in Germany the most common form of payment is via cash and going to the bank whenever I need more of it (about once or twice a month) is convenient enough for me. Cash does not leave a paper trail, cash doesn't create paperwork when you lose it... The only reason why I'd ever need or want a credit card would be for overseas transactions, because apparently it's not possible to send bank transfers to the USA, despite things like the IBAN and SWIFT. I can even use my regular bank card as a sort-of debit card, although that's limited to this administrative district.
      Maybe that's why free credit cards are uncommon over here - there just isn't enough of a market to spark that much of a competition.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:Credit Card Replacement? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I answered your and the sibling's post in one. I wasn't aware that anyone outside the USA (which are known to be CC-crazy) considered free credit cards normal. Over here they're pretty much a premium service.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  10. Ebay? by dohcvtec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, can it be used as a method of payment for Ebay auctions and other person-to-person transactions?

    And...

    I don't think PayPal will be going away anytime soon. PayPal's business is driven by Ebay, and PayPal is part of Ebay.

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
  11. Google isn't a "Consumer" company. by cybrthng · · Score: 0, Troll

    The customer support SUCKS unless you are spending well over 60k a month or generating revenues in excsess of 10-15k a month.

    I'm not sure how google can swing such a project when they refuse to answer questions, they freeze more accounts tha paypal ever has done and they don't provide a good user/consumer experience.

    Google is all about satisfying few and reaping the rewards. Until they change their supremacy know it all attitude.. i won't "buy" it.

    1. Re:Google isn't a "Consumer" company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up, +1 random tirade

    2. Re:Google isn't a "Consumer" company. by spacefight · · Score: 1

      "they freeze more accounts tha paypal ever has done"

      Yeah right. Any proof of that? What kind of accounts? Google Checkout accounts? I assume that they haven't even that many accounts yet (rememeber, they started today) as Paypal ever closed so far...

    3. Re:Google isn't a "Consumer" company. by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      uhm.. Adwords, Adsense, Support for Google Appliance and many other products i have used 10s of thousands of dollars on and don't meat the "par" customer they expect.

      Shutting down of sites for no reason, cross closing non linked accounts, the list goes on and on.

      ofcourse this payment system is new, but you would have to be an idiot to not recognize how brutally inept google's support system is.

      They just can't handle it if you ask me. Glad to see i got modded down, you can take off those rose glasses whenever you come crying back to slashdot that Google support sucks when your credit cards and transactions are frozen.

  12. Hooray! by chrismcdirty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now Google can keep all of my credit cards on file for me! Maybe the NSA should contract them for a new domestic spying program.

    --
    It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    1. Re:Hooray! by Pirogoeth · · Score: 1

      I suspect that if the NSA has some interest in your credit card number, they'd be able to quickly figure it out whether you had it registered on Google or not...

      --
      Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    2. Re:Hooray! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I don't want to give my bank details/ credit card info to ebay (I already give it to paypal), so this is also a concern.

      That being said, I would put more trust in Google to do things correctly, and not accidently send my details to the population of the internet, or leave some server open, or sell of some hardrive with it.

    3. Re:Hooray! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1
      I don't want to give my bank details/ credit card info to ebay (I already give it to paypal), so this is also a concern.
      Paypal and eBay are the same company, it's too late for you.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Hooray! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realise that Ebay bought Paypal - but for some stupid reason, they still want my details to be considered 'verified' - annoying isn't it.

    5. Re:Hooray! by christian.elliott · · Score: 1

      Ok seriously, a note to the Editors, with the stories that have been posted on /. lately, we need a "+1 Scary" mod.

  13. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > No matter how much I dislike PayPal, I'm forced to use it if I want to buy something from eBay

    I think, with this and other online payment systems, you won't actually need to use eBay for much longer. The combination of eBays shocking lack of regard for blatant scams, their stock - ineffectual and often incorrect or irrelevant - replies to complaints, and the way they push their inherently unsafe PayPal* system has put me off using them.

    *When is the money mine? As a seller I mean? For how long afterwards can someone just take the money out of my account? How have PayPal managed to piss off so many people so quickly?

  14. New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by kthejoker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the most important thing about this entire endeavor is that it is the first Google product that plans on actually introducing a revenue stream besides advertising to the company (especially since the Google Pay Video system has more or less fell through at this point in time.)

    I'm not quite sure what that means for the long-term health of the company, but I suspect that the more streams of revenue a company has, the more likely they are to become conservative, entrenched, and reluctant to embrace change. Google has managed to avoid all that because they've had a strong beam focus on a single revenue stream (ad dollars) - as they start matriculating, I suspect that beam focus will dissipate.

    But then again, they're Google - they just work smarter than basically every other company out there today. So I put nothing out of their reach.

    1. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Dannon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you reach this conclusion, that many revenue streams==conservatism==entrenched attitudes?

      Take the New York Times, for example. Revenue from advertising, classifieds, subscriptions, sidewalk sales, and now, subscription services on their web site.

      I would also be inclined to say that they've got an "entrenched" attitude. Government regulations on the news media are just fine, even welcome, as long as they don't apply to the printing press media. Also, they managed to wrangle the NY city government into eminent-domaining a fine piece of property for their new HQ.

      But I would definitely not call their politics "conservative", not by a long shot.

      It's the people that make the company. As long as Google continues to hire people that share the views of its original managers, you need not fear the doom of a change in politics.

      And I'd put to you that it's not either conservatism or liberalism that needs to be feared, but rather, lobbyistism. And I think it's just a bit late for that.

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read their pricing scheme; sellers get free transactions if they use adwords, and the more they spend on adwords, the more free transactions they get. So, while this is definitely a new revenue stream, it is *also* a way to further bolster their main revenue stream.

    3. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this new paypal style service could actually make the google video thing work.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    4. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by scolby · · Score: 1

      Actually, this could tie into Google's ad business extremely well. With the information garnered from purchase using Google's checkout service, Google could easily serve targeted ads to users.

    5. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by dpreston · · Score: 1
      I like your point, and I'm sure that may be the case down the road, but right now it's still all (mostly) advertising money. They are actually swallowing $0.10 off of every transaction (CCs tend to charge .30 and 1.9%). From the NYT article (thanks ems2):

      Banking industry executives say that credit card processors typically pay MasterCard and Visa a fee of 30 cents and 1.95 percent for every purchase, so Google will be subsidizing many transactions. ...
      Mr. Schmidt said the company was willing to lose money on transaction fees because it felt the package would increase advertising spending.


      Google is still going primarily for the adv. market.
    6. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'm not quite sure what that means for the long-term health of the company, but I suspect that the more streams of revenue a company has, the more likely they are to become conservative, entrenched, and reluctant to embrace change...

      I thought that adopting more revenue streams generally meant that a company had to be willing to embrace novelty and change. I mean, trying new businesses doesn't scream out 'conservative and entrenched' to me....

      As for the long-term health of the company, new revenue streams are almost always good. It means that if one branch of the company has a bad year, the whole business isn't going to fold.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Grandparent doesn't mean "conservative" in the United States left-right political spectrum meaning of the word. Kthejoker clearly means conservative in the more general, resistance-to-change sense.

    8. Re:New Revenue Streams Trend to Conservatism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf? What's more conservative than The New York Times? Harvard University? Can't think of much else...

  15. Paypal has one thing on google... by JumperCable · · Score: 3, Interesting

    4.7% interest on money contained in paypal accounts, no minimum. That's hard to beat for a pretty liquid fund of money.

    1. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      4.7 percent? Holy APR Batman! I can't even get a 60-month CD with interest like that.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      Emigrantdirect.com has 4.8% savings accounts. No minimums. Hooks up with any checking account and money can be transfered between the accounts.

    3. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by Mr.123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?st art=0&catid=52&threadid=478098 Citibank is now offering 5%. FDIC insured and will not lose value like a money market fund.

    4. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by mapmaker · · Score: 1

      Are you living under a rock? Even 12-month CDs are over 5% these days.

    5. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except they can confiscate your money at any time for violating their terms of service. So liquid it might just slip through your fingers...

    6. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out this blog Bank Deals. While a lot of the CD specials on there are for local credit unions, there are also a lot of great online bank deals. Etrade, for example, currently has 3-month CD at 4.75% and the longer-term CDs going up from there.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    7. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      HSBC (www.hsbcdirect.com) now offers savings accounts with 4.8% interest rates, FDIC insured, will not lose value - and you get an ATM card.

      I have a Paypal account (no money it) and a "Premier Business" Paypal credit card from my days as a seller, but the lack of any banking securities just gives me the heebie-jeebies. If Google agrees to let themselves be regulated as a bank, I'll open an account.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    8. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It depends where you are. In the UK, investing Pounds Sterling, it is pretty hard to get anything over 4.5%, even on a relatively long-term investment. The important thing to note here is that the rate of inflation in the UK is around 2% for 2006, while in the US it is 3.7%. This means that you need an interest rate of 3.7% on a US Dollar just for your money to be worth the same amount, while you would only need 2% if your money is in Pounds Sterling (or close to 0% if it's in Swiss Francs).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Paypal has one thing on google... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Okay. Maybe my bank just sucks. At least I don't have any money. :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  16. PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by Whafro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While we all love Google and everything it produces over here on slashdot, I don't think that they are going to crash PayPal's party in the too near future.

    This is what they said when Blockbuster started competing with NetFlix, but NetFlix is doing quite alright by themselves, and PayPal is, in my opinion, in better shape in their space than NetFlix was. PayPal and eBay are pretty good bed buddies, and PayPal is already accepted on thousands of other websites. People know the name, people have used it before, people know it works.

    Regardless of how great the product Google produces turns out to be, people will still use PayPal as long as PayPal remains competitive, which I imagine it will. I mean, for all the people who rave and rant about how amazing Gmail is, the mailing list that my mom's quilt shop has accumulated is saturated with yahoo, hotmail, and aol addresses, with not a single gmail address to be found out of a few thousand names.

    1. Re:PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I am not sure why you bought up your blockbuster/netflix example? Google hasn't really made a claim about them. And I am sure you can think of many examples of business that have "crashed" an established businesses party. But that is not really relevant.

      Google are in this for the longterm. They tie this in with their search business and froogle, and they have a huge drawcard. They do things better than paypal (although I personally haven't had a problem with paypal), it helps them too.

      Paypal are linked to ebay, so they are strong, but have they been doing anything else lately? Since they were brought by ebay, maybe they are not interested in anything else - this leaves a market for Google.

    2. Re:PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by owlnation · · Score: 1
      PayPal and eBay are pretty good bed buddies, and PayPal is already accepted on thousands of other websites. People know the name, people have used it before, people know it works.
      In the US perhaps this may be true. The rest of the world is wide open. Paypal does exist outside of the US, but has only started developing limited local services within the past 2 years, with mixed success. Paypal does not have any significant market control outside of the US, and the Google name is likely much better known and trusted in most countries. Google stands a great chance of winning if they choose to expand this service.
    3. Re:PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by tbmcmullen · · Score: 1
      I mean, for all the people who rave and rant about how amazing Gmail is, the mailing list that my mom's quilt shop has accumulated is saturated with yahoo, hotmail, and aol addresses, with not a single gmail address to be found out of a few thousand names.
      Thats because the GMail interface is too quick for the old quilting ladies. They're freaked out by AJAX and find it to be unnatural. Moreover, its been proven by numerous studies that little old quilting ladies don't like buzzwords.
    4. Re:PayPal isn't going anywhere anytime soon by egghat · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ.

      An international rollout of a payment service is a difficult task. You have to comply to completely different laws in every country. I wouldn't underestimate this problem.

      And your statement that Paypal isn't used widely outside the US was true until ebay bought them. The ebay merger gave Paypal a major boost. My estimate is that about half of the European ebay users now have Paypal.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  17. just great by BugDoomBug · · Score: 2, Informative
    An additional spam header coming your way

    "Dear Valued Customer, In an effort to protect your security and combat identity fraud we need to periodically confirm your account activity and identity. Please click here, login using your google account information, and complete the highly detailed personalized questionaire.

    Sincerely,
    Not a Phishing Attempt

    So anyone grab checkoutgoogle.com for this yet?

  18. Interconnected services by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I acknoledge that I'm paranoid, but the thing that makes me nervous about google services is that thay use single account for all purposes. This not only allows to keep track of my whole life, but also allows a person, who hijacks my email account, take control over my mail, internet messenger (IM was used for several famous frauds in Russia), and now money directly!

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
    1. Re:Interconnected services by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah - I don't like that my gmail password would now give someone access to my credit card if I were to sign up for Google checkout. I like to keep things more compartmentalized than that. For things like e-mail and other lower security things I use one set of passwords, but for PayPal I use a unique, much longer, and more secure one and make sure never to have my Browser store it.

      Also, it's convenient to stay logged into Google for gmail, but I wouldn't want to do that at work if it gave access to my credit card! I think a seperate password, required each time you buy something, would be better than using your one password to the Googleplex.

    2. Re:Interconnected services by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know that you don't have to sign up for all these services under the same account, right?

    3. Re:Interconnected services by Milo_oliM · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree, perhaps a pin in addition to the password would suffice. So that when you want to access another service, especially checkout, it would require a little verification that it is still you on the computer. This adds a little bit of insulation to the account, and wouldn't be too much of a burden.

    4. Re:Interconnected services by SuperMog2002 · · Score: 1

      Nothing's stopping you from using multiple Google accounts, especially since they gave everyone and their dog a hundred invites a few months ago. It would be a bit of a pain having to log out and log back in, but then, I'd find it a pain having to log in multiple times to use different services, so you lose either way. I like Milo_oliM's plan posted above. A second password needed for only the more sensitive services.

      --
      Sunwalker Dezco for Warchief in 2016
    5. Re:Interconnected services by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do if you pay attention to Google's Terms of Service.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Interconnected services by Herbst · · Score: 1

      Good points. Why don't you consider using two different Google accounts? One more for ease-of-use and the other more for sensitive things.

    7. Re:Interconnected services by dave1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know that you don't have to sign up for all these services under the same account, right?

      Only if you want to be legal about it. When it comes to my cash, I prefer to do stuff above the table.

      Google's TOS doesn't allow multiple accounts.

    8. Re:Interconnected services by MaXMC · · Score: 1

      Well, You can only ship stuff to and address you've already specified, and if you change it. Google have thought about that already.

    9. Re:Interconnected services by Sanga · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay let us create an account B for GBuy; account M for GMail; account T for gtalk; O for orkut. That should work and be compartmentalised. Right?

      No. Now OP receives GBuy email in B -- and has to login as B to see what is going on. Wants to hang out on orkut -- logout and login again.

      Either do a lot of cookie-editor plugin dancing or just stick to having one GCompartment for all!!

    10. Re:Interconnected services by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Decent idea. I guess that's what I'll do if I want to use it and they havn't changed it. I guess it remains to be seen if there's any downside to doing that in terms of ease of use (e.g. e-mails related to purchases)... it doesn't seem to be what they intended.

    11. Re:Interconnected services by gentoo1337 · · Score: 1

      Google's TOS doesn't allow multiple accounts.

      Wrong! What part of:

      Q: "Can I have more than one Google Account?"
      A: "Yes,"

      don't you understand? ;-)

      https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?a nswer=24831&topic=313

  19. Customers DON'T pay... by jsharkey · · Score: 5, Informative
    Would you be prepared to pay 2% on every single purchase you made at an online store just so you don't have to "fill out forms"?
    Remember, the $0.20 + 2% is paid by the seller and is taken out of the actual price. Consumers will see no price difference.
    1. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is naive, like saying customers don't pay taxes levied on the seller. EVERYTHING is paid by the customer - the only difference is whether the payment is explicit or buried in the cost of doing business...

    2. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      Which isn't any different than credit cards right? Does anyone know what Visa and the others charge for their service?

    3. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Does anyone know what Visa and the others charge for their service?
      The amount charged to merchants for a sale varies greatly depending on the agreement between the merchant and the card processor. Factors can include the number of monthly transactions, total monthly dollar amount, number of chargebacks, swiped vs. manually entered transactions, etc. In general the google figure is probably in line or a bit lower than what most small business merchants are charged per transaction.

      The interesting things will be how chargebacks are handled, what fraud prevention measures are in place, and who eats the cost of fraud. With a credit card I get a lot of protection and infrastructure that handles all of this. Google will have to at least match this before I will consider using it.

      Personally I still don't know how Paypal manages to avoid being classified as a bank by the government.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    4. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      To continue the thought here.. many stores here advertise a cash price. So if pay by credit, they tell you that there is that surcharge.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    5. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      According to the NYT article mentioned in this post:
      "Banking industry executives say that credit card processors typically pay MasterCard and Visa a fee of 30 cents and 1.95 percent for every purchase"

      So google is 0.05% more expensive but 10 cents cheaper per purchase. To be a nerd, Google will be more expensive when
      Price * 0.0005 > $0.10 so Price > $200. But even then we are talking a difference of pennies.

      So Google is about there or maybe even a little cheaper or expensive depending on purchase price.
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    6. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      99.9999% of online transactions are done via credit cards, which typically have higher fees that what Google is charging.

      So stop beating the dead horse, he's dead already!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    7. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by skubeedooo · · Score: 1
      Remember, the $0.20 + 2% is paid by the seller and is taken out of the actual price.

      It only obfuscates the issue. A seller could provide a form and a google-checkout. The customer can then choose whether to save $0.15 and 1.5% on the transaction, or not.

    8. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by muhgcee · · Score: 1

      Only place I have ever seen that is at computer shows.

    9. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Customers always pay.

      If a seller's costs suddenly go up by 2%, you can bet their prices go up by at least that, and possibly as much as 5%.

    10. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by avdp · · Score: 1

      Well, Google is just a layer on top of the credit card companies, and they have to make a profit too. I wouldn't expect them to be cheaper overall. Although they may be cheaper than what certain merchants pay (some have higher rates than others, based on numerous factors).

    11. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      They are leveraging their Adwords program with Checkout so they can stand to take a hit. Notice all the gimmicks with Adwords they offer.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    12. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Zaphod2016 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a frame of reference: I was charged $0.25 + 2.25% for Visa/MC transactions. Merchants with higher volume can save money over PayPal, but for small fries like me I saw no competitve advantage in keeping a "regular" merchant account (especially after you factor in a monthly fee of ~$25).

      I heard many horror stories about PayPal, but so far they've been good to me. And considering the total lack of customer support I got from the "real bank", the support factor was moot (IMO).

    13. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      To continue the thought here.. many stores here advertise a cash price. So if pay by credit, they tell you that there is that surcharge.


      Actually according to their merchant agreements with the credit card companies, merchants are not allowed to charge a surcharge for using a credit card. They can however, give you a discount for using cash, as seen at many gas stations.

      Just wording of course, but an important difference to the card issuers.

    14. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by darkov · · Score: 1

      Something to note if you're in the merchant business is that this (and PayPal) is much cheaper, as in free, to setup that a merchant account with your bank. With PayPal you can have multiple currencies which can save you $2-3K in setup fees.

    15. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by anothy · · Score: 1
      Personally I still don't know how Paypal manages to avoid being classified as a bank by the government.
      well, first off, the laws vary by state, so there's a lot of variability. generally, however, PayPal gets by banking regulations because they have a tight relationship with a real bank, who holds all the actual money. when you sign up for a PayPal account, PayPal goes off and creates an account specifically for you at this partner bank. i believe the account is still in PayPal's name, but it makes the accounting very clear, and has the benefit of automatically preserving things like FDIC insurance (just passed along, nothing special). PayPal is, in at least some places, regulated as a money transfer business (similar to Western Union).
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    16. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by General_Crespin · · Score: 1

      A lot of truck stops will have a cash price and a credit price for diesel (maybe gasoline too, haven't noticed).

      --
      "The past is but the beginning of a beginning, and all that is and has been is but the twilight of the dawn."
    17. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since you asked... My small business (couldn't resist the shameless plug, sorry) pays about 1.5% + $0.10 per transaction. The actual amount varies based on whether I'm doing a debit or credit transaction.

    18. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by nxtw · · Score: 1

      IIRC they also aren't supposed to have a minimum transaction amount. A few area gas stations (mostly franchises that have some autonomy in their operations) have enforced minimum transaction limits unless you are buying gasoline.

      A friend told me that a local Taco Bell franchise only accepts debit cards (not credit) and even then charges a small surcharge for that "convenience". Just about every other restaurant or fast food place accepts credit cards anytime -- including other Taco Bells, and a coffee/ice cream shop franchise.

      I choose not to patronize locations that do not accept credit or enforce a minimum. I got the credit card with a bigger convenience store/gas station chain, so I get a percentage back with all purchases at those stores.

    19. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      The customer can then choose whether to save $0.15 and 1.5% on the transaction, or not.

      Except that, at least in the US, this is illegal in most states. The laws for this vary from state to state, but it is almost universally illegal to offer a discount for paying cash (or cash equivalent). Some states will allow a surcharge for CC usage, but that has been done away with in most states too. In most cases is is generally the law that you can not change the price of a product or service based on the payment method.

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    20. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Yes, customers always pay. The cash always comes from those doing the buying.

      That said, most sellers, especially smaller ones, aren't smart enough or diligent enough to raise their prices to compensate. Often it's not worth the trouble. How often do you see a seller set a cash price lower than the credit price? Unless that happens, it is the seller actually paying through lowered margins. One way or another, buyers pay the fees but not so matter-of-factly as you say.

      On a large scale sellers will have to get certain margins to survive and prices will increase by 2% or so. That's unlikely to happen on a purchase-by-purchase basis.

    21. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
      How often do you see a seller set a cash price lower than the credit price?

      The gas station right down the street has different prices if you pay with cash vs. a credit card. Heck, Arco won't even take credit cards.

      And while many small businesses won't have two prices - a cash price and a credit price - many will knock something off if you pay in cash (especially smaller businesses where the cash can be taken "under the table", so to speak). The cash benefit / cost savings for the consumer increases and the beauracracy increases. So for credit cards, the cash bonus isn't going to be extremely high, but cash in lieu of dealing with insurance at a dentist or clinic? You can save some serious money that way (assuming you have a high deductible plan where you're not going to have the insurer covering the majority of the costs).

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    22. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by smallferret · · Score: 0

      The customary rate is between 3% and 5% of the total purchase, though larger companies could probably sign a contract for a smaller percentage. In addition, most credit card contracts in the US stipulate that the seller must charge the same price for paying with a credit card as paying with cash or check.

    23. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's amazing. No wonder prices are so high, there's no incentive for CC companies to reduce them. Pretty tasty legislation for them, I would say.

    24. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's amazing. No wonder prices are so high, there's no incentive for CC companies to reduce them. Pretty tasty legislation for them, I would say.

      One really has nothing to do with the other. Different banks and processing companies are free to charge whatever they like, and they can certainly lower their rates to be more competitive if they choose. Laws like these are more about enforcing tax reporting than anything else.

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    25. Re:Customers DON'T pay... by skubeedooo · · Score: 1
      It would cost a merchant too much in lost sales for them to refuse a payment type, so they just have to mark up the price of the goods by the maximum cost of all the payment types they offer. Since the merchant has already increased the price, there is no incentive for the customer to pay with a cheaper method, so he pays with the most convenient one, which may well end up costing the merchant the most.

      From the perspective of the CCC, there is no incentive to undercut their competition, because the person who chooses the payment method (the customer) doesn't see the price difference, so the reduction in price will not lead to more demand. In fact, as long as a certain method is cheaper than the most expensive method, the merchant still benefits by adding it to their list.

  20. Micropayments by Threni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > 2% and $0.20

    So they didn't want to just take the 2% so it could be used by websites to charge tiny amounts of money per page/hour etc? $0.20 blows that intriguing possibility out of the water. They could accrue the amounts spent until it reached some value where the transaction was worth performing, if they're worried about thousands of $0.001 hits slowing down their system or costing too much to run.

    1. Re:Micropayments by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Credit cards typically charge a transaction fee on top of a percentage fee. Since it looks like you can only do credit card transactions through Google Checkout, they have to pass those fees on to you.

      Paypal is in a much better position currently for the micropayment market. Since you can store money directly in your Paypal account, Paypal could move money between accounts with zero overhead. If Paypal ever drops the transaction fee for non-credit card transactions for merchant accounts, that is.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:Micropayments by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Credit cards typically charge a transaction fee on top of a percentage fee. Since it looks like you
      > can only do credit card transactions through Google Checkout, they have to pass those fees on to
      > you.

      Google could have its own account for you. It'd track the micropayments you're racking up, then when it got to $10 or whatever, it'd put the charge onto your credit card, but that might be 5,000 pages or whatever. Or they could do it monthly. Whatever.

    3. Re:Micropayments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PayPal already does this: https://www.paypal.com/IntegrationCenter/ic_microp ayments.html

      5% plus 5cents. Not quite ready for $0.001 transactions, but it's a good start for anyone selling stuff for $5 or less.

  21. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are not forced to use Paypal to pay for eBay auctions. Each seller, for each item they list, can choose what payment methods they accept. Some accept PayPal, some don't. Some accept only PayPal. Some will accept Money orders. Even for sellers that only accept PayPal, you can usually pay them through PayPal using your CC without creating a PayPal account - in effect just making PayPal their CC processor.

  22. US residents only! by dapyx · · Score: 5, Informative
    Has anyone noticed it's only for US residents?
    By agreeing to this Terms of Service for Buyers, you represent that you are: 18 years old or older; capable of entering into a legally binding agreement; and a resident of the United States.
    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    1. Re:US residents only! by pcgamez · · Score: 1

      Duh? When US based companies release a new (virtual) product, they usually test it in a single market first.

    2. Re:US residents only! by cyberdanx · · Score: 1

      When you log in it allows you to pick a country. The TOS says U.S. resisdents only though. Suppose it depends how you interpret 'resident'. ;) Hopefully if they roll it out elsewhere they'll support Maestro.

    3. Re:US residents only! by psycln · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny thing, I just signed up for checkout with my G Account and all I had to do is specify a different country.

      I even tried buying something from Buy.com and got the Oops from Google.

    4. Re:US residents only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they accept EU residents, they would have to abide much stricter privacy rules...which would make the whole thing pointless.
      Or what do you think is this all about ?
      It's very clear that Google is all about datamining.
      The Adsense revenues are nice, but if they have collected enough customer data, they will move advertisements to a new level.
      In fact the old-fashioned ads will be a joke in 10 years or so.
      They will control this market and there will be no way around them - because they are the only party with enough customer data.

      That's the reason why big money is buying Google even at the insane stock prices.
      In 10 years advertisment = Google monopoly = endless fountain of money.

    5. Re:US residents only! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, yes a US company only opening it up to US residents, what a tradegy. Get a grip.

      Am I the only that noticed that the submitter mixed US and European ways of expressing decimals? And why the hell did the editor not fix it? Lastly, on an American website talking about a service, that transfers American money, of an American company that only allows US residents to use it, we should only be using the US system of using a period to express a decimal point and a comma for a place holder for every 3 digits. If this was http://slashdot.eu/ then I could see handling decimals in a different fashion, but it's not.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:US residents only! by bob291 · · Score: 1

      So Google can really become a one-stop shopping location for the NSA? Simplifying life for them and maybe in the end bringing down our taxes. Oops, forgot Google doesn't provide phone service yet....... or

    7. Re:US residents only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they don't even include America Junior (Canada). Oh well..

    8. Re:US residents only! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Quick! Someone tell the Greek guy who posted up there!

    9. Re:US residents only! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Get a grip"? The OP stated a simple fact, I hardly see them wildly flying off the handle about this.

      You've spent an awful lot more words to be a pedant about the fact that Slashdot has dared to use euro decimal notation on a couple of numbers in an article about an American company, American product, American blah blah blah. Who needs to get a grip here?

    10. Re:US residents only! by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      I was pretty excited about gpay (due to PayPal's poor handling of problems), until I read this. PayPal took ages to get support for Canadian bank accounts (and after that divorce, I won't be seeing a credit card for a looong, looong time!)

      The only reason I'm hopeful, is that Google has seemed more progressive in the past to supporting Canadian needs (google maps/earth, quickly rounded out Canadian support, after an initial weak showing). Crossing my fingers that they'll nail another easy/similar market to the US, fairly soon. (Sorry, Greece! :P)

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  23. Visa and Mastercard aren't the best examples... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    I actually thought they were the same company, but apparently they just work very closely together, to the point that the US Justice Department sued them over common ownership affecting competition.

    --
    AccountKiller
  24. What? No Bank Account Support? by glasgowm · · Score: 1

    I'll have to stick with Paypal until Google Checkout adds support for bank accounts. :(

  25. Correction. by Funkcikle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

    Should read as:

    "The service allows Google to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

    1. Re:Correction. by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Let's just think of it as one step closer to being able to Google for your lost keys.

  26. Credit-Card Only? by KarMax · · Score: 1

    For now Google CheckOut its CreditCard only...

    I don't see anything that says they will support users without a credit card (or any other sort of payment).
    How do you see this?
    IMO almost everybody who buy something on Internet has a Credit Card. right?

    There is another "google-thing" that has came without a "public"-beta version? (AFAIK checkout doesn't has any public beta)

    --
    Rock and Roll
    1. Re:Credit-Card Only? by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

      I doubt that any service handling your credit card transactions would get a lot of bites if you called it "beta"

      --
      www.wildpad.com
  27. Money is the route of all evil by Gax · · Score: 1

    I hope their security is good. Unified payment systems present a target to hackers.

  28. Need more payment options! by RemovableBait · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before Google Checkout has much hope of usurping PayPal, they'll need to accept more payment options.

    Paypal currently allows payment direct from a bank account (I don't expect Google to need this), Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Delta, Maestro, Visa Electron, Solo, Discover, and more if you count their other services. That's at least 10 ways to pay.

    Google, on the other hand, accept Visa, Mastercard, Amex and Discover. With only 4 ways to pay, I suspect Google Checkout is not an option for many people.

    Disclaimer: I live in the UK and this is based on my experience with the UK PayPal service. I also agree with the sentiments of paypalsucks.com, and would like to see Google smash PayPal to pieces if they can Do No Evil. YMMV.

    1. Re:Need more payment options! by rayde · · Score: 1

      with Google Checkout being currently available in the US only, i think the 4 methods they accept will cover most households.

    2. Re:Need more payment options! by Software · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I disagree. From a US perspective, Visa, Mastercard, Amex and Discover have approximately 100% penetration. OK, there's a few people (privacy nuts, mostly -- no offense) who don't have a CC, but you're far more likely to find someone without a bank account than you are to find someone without one of these credit card accounts. I've never heard of Delta, Maestro, Visa Electron, or Solo.

      A bank account may be more useful for sellers (how exactly do you add money to your Visa account, anyway?), but I don't know why a buyer would prefer to have eBay withdraw from a bank account. I know people can go both ways, so to speak, but for people who mostly buy, I think Checkout is fine.

    3. Re:Need more payment options! by mattkime · · Score: 1

      exactly what i was going to say in response to that post.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    4. Re:Need more payment options! by MrDoh1 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the US and I can tell you it won't work for me. I'm betting it also won't work for lots of others. I Accept PayPal payments and probably close to 25% of them ARE direct from checking or savings account transfers. As a merchant, I have to wait for these to clear just like I would a check.

      But why won't I use them? I don't have a credit card! I know, it sounds amazing, but it's true. I also do quite a lot of shopping on line. Well, I say I don't have a credit card, but I do now have one of those nifty debit cards that you can use as a credit card. And guess what? It came from PayPal and has their name on it! So not only will they allow me to pay by check, they give me an alternative to a real credit card with all it's fees. There is no fee's to use the PayPal card as debit or credit (at least not fees from PayPal). Oh, then there's another offer of theirs. If you are a merchant and will put up 1 PayPal graphic on your website saying you accept PayPal, that debit/credit card remains a debit card, but becomes a credit card that offers 1% back on all credit card purchases. And let me tell you it's instant cash back. As soon as the charge shows up in PayPal, 1% is immediately credited back.

      I understand lots of people have had problems with PayPal, but, like anything else, it's the law of averages. PayPal has a huge customer base, some people are going to have problems. I'm also not stupid. If funds get to a certain level where it would be dangerous if the account suddenly disappeared (acct froze, or whatever), I transfer money out of PayPal and into a real bank account. If Google isn't allowing you to pay by bank account, I doubt they are letting you transfer to a bank account either, so, unless you buy something using your Google account, any money you have there may just be stranded there, unless they will send you a check, but that would be costly on them!

      It's been covered elsewhere, but, as a small merchant, PayPal beats the pants off of any credit card merchant account that I've ever had, even when I refused to sign merchant deals that had a monthly fee involved.

      And lately, I've not been happy with Google anyway. My GMail account was down for 8-10 hrs the other day. No news from Google on the outage, no word when it would be fixed or what caused it... Just, Sorry, Unable to process your request. For hours and hours. And then there's what got them started, search. Well, these days, Google's search results seem no better than any other mainstream search engine out there. There are too many of those damn catch all keyword sites that nothing but an ad words page with dynamically generated crap on it that pretends to be what you want. I have started using other search engines again in an effort to find the productivity that Google has seem to have lost. If I have to read through 3 or more pages of results, and look at ads... other search engines are beginning to offer a real challenge to Google's dominance in my opinion. Its also been mentioned elsewhere that their spider comes around a lot less often than the spiders from any of the other search engines, and my web server logs bear this out as well.

      Last, but most certainly not least, is what seems to be Goggle's mentality of "All your information is belonging to us." G.. G.. Google... G.. G.. Government... I consider it bad that both probably know just as much about me. I've got to where I trust both about equally as well, and thats not much.

      --
      I am Homer of Borg. Resistance is Fut.. Mmmmmmmm, Donuts!
    5. Re:Need more payment options! by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      It looks like Maestro is a Mastercard brand and Visa Electron is obviously a Visa brand, so I would imagine that they would work (In the US nearly all debit cards now just have the Mastercard or Visa logo on them).

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    6. Re:Need more payment options! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Amex is only really accepted in the US. A few places outside to take it, but since they charge retailers 1-2% more than the competition and hardly anyone has them, there isn't much incentive.

      Delta is the debit-card form of Visa. Anywhere that will accept Visa will accept Delta. The only difference is that the money comes from your bank account rather than from a credit account. Maestro is Mastercard's equivalent. Most bank cards carry one or other of these logos.

      Visa Electron is similar, but slightly different in implementation. The Electron payment process checks your account balance before allowing payment to proceed. It will not let you continue if paying would make you overdrawn. This is so the cards can be given to children. Banks are not, by law, permitted to loan money to minors and so an Electron or similar card is all you can get as a child (unless the bank decides it is willing to absorb any overdraft you run up). For some reason there are a significant number of places that won't accept Electron (even though any Visa machine will take it). I don't know why this is, perhaps something due to liability or fees?

      Solo is, I believe, the same sort of thing as Electron, but owned by Switch who were (as I recall) the first company to offer debit cards.

      The advantage of paying with a credit card over a debit card is buyer protection. The advantage of paying with a debit card is no (or much lower) fees for the seller. If Checkout is still charging fees for both, as PayPal does, then this advantage goes away.

      Oh, and you can put money in a Visa account. My Mastercard actually has a fairly good rate of interest and so it's not outside the realms of possibility that I would want to use it for that. You put money into it in exactly the same way you do every month when you pay the bill; as a payment from my debit card online, in my case.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Need more payment options! by Przepla · · Score: 1
      Visa Electron is similar, but slightly different in implementation. The Electron payment process checks your account balance before allowing payment to proceed. It will not let you continue if paying would make you overdrawn. This is so the cards can be given to children. Banks are not, by law, permitted to loan money to minors and so an Electron or similar card is all you can get as a child (unless the bank decides it is willing to absorb any overdraft you run up). For some reason there are a significant number of places that won't accept Electron (even though any Visa machine will take it). I don't know why this is, perhaps something due to liability or fees?
      The reason for many places not accepting Visa Electron is that basically VE is (usually) a Visa debit card with MO/TO/IO (Mail Order/Telephone Order/Internet Order) disabled. I have Visa Electron with MO/TO/IO enabled, and I use it succesfully everywhere where they are accepting plain Visa. Never my card was rejected.
      --
      When in doubt, go to the library. - Ron Weasley in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
  29. more info by feamsr00 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It would seem I wasnt fast enough to post this story, but I had a couple more links and useful info, so here it is:

    Google Checkout has been released today. From their blog: We've heard time and again from users: "I find great stores through Google search, but every time I try to buy from an online store, I have to re-enter the same billing, shipping, and credit card information. There are too many steps. Why can't it be as fast as a Google search?" This motivated us to improve the online purchase process, and so today we're announcing Google Checkout, a checkout option that makes buying across the web fast and easy."
    Google CheckOut includes single signon and badges on adwords of merchants that use Google CheckOut.
    Features include using many addresses and many different cards for buyers and a "Payment Guarantee" against chargebacks for sellers.
    AdWords users get $10 in sales processed for free for every $1 spent on AdWords.

    For those of us text weary, there are videos for buyers and sellers

    1. Re:more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AdWords users get $10 in sales processed for free for every $1 spent on AdWords.

      Everyone pretty much agrees that PayPal is evil, and this do no evil company is battling the evil PayPal.
      But how is this not a case of a company using its monopolistic position in one area (search) to expand to another (online payment).

  30. PayPal vs Google checkpout by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    I am interested to see viable alternatives to PayPal, their transaction rates are very expensive given the type and value of the transactions. I understand that every business has to make money but I am sure they would have more customers if the transaction cost where lower or had a better rate.

    1. Re:PayPal vs Google checkpout by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      NoChex used to be good. I don't know if they still exist. They didn't charge anything for transactions, but they had a flat fee of £1 (?) every time you put money into your account or took money out. If you sold something and then used the money to buy something else then you would pay nothing.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. This would be very bad if it put PayPal out by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    This would be awful if it put PayPal out of business. I don't see how that could possibly happen, but all the same, it would not be good for Google.

    Look what has happened to PayPal without any real competition in the game, poor service, lots of fear over how accounts are handled. I think the same thing would happen to Google without competition forcing them to be the best.

    I know a lot of people are starting to fear Google. Google used to be the underdog, and people love underdogs, especially Americans and especially geeks. Google seems to be motivated by jumping over the bar, no matter who is setting it, no matter how high. If Google becomes a dominating force I think many of us fear that they are exactly in the right position to become another MS.

    1. Re:This would be very bad if it put PayPal out by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      But, to put PayPal out of business, it would have to be better than PP (at least for awhile), which is good for us. It's more likely that PP would improve to keep up with Google, which means we'd have two services competing against each other, which is better.

      I agree that having multiple competing companies is always better than having one monopoly.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  32. Racing shopping cart by Bromskloss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want one too! Wroom, wroom!

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  33. Differing Features by jascat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't look into it very hard, but it seems like Paypal has same major features that Google Checkout doesn't have; direct access to bank accounts and person to person transfers. I have used direct transfers several times for transfering money between family members. We are all pretty lazy and it has become easier to use Paypal than it is to write a check and put it in the mail. Also, Paypal seems to be more convenient to the casual seller on Ebay. Also, what about the folks on sites like Rent-a-coder that like to get paid through Paypal. I can see how they would compete on the business side, but for regular joe's, Paypal is still the answer.

    1. Re:Differing Features by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Is that feature really that useful? All online bank accounts offer that service already, all you need is the account number.

    2. Re:Differing Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is that feature really that useful? All online bank accounts offer that service already, all you need is the account number.

      You can't be an American. I understand this is common in some European countries, but in the US you cannot simply transfer funds from one bank to another online. You can do it if you are the owner of all the accounts and they're at the same bank, sure. But no bank will allow you to transfer funds from one bank to another without charging you a ridiculous "wire transfer" fee. You can't even do it at the same bank between different people.

    3. Re:Differing Features by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Wow, that sucks. I guess I can see how people would find that feature so useful then. Strange, banks here (UK) are trying to encourage people to do everything online and stop going to branches. I don't even get any interest on my current account unless I log into the website once a month.

  34. Google Checkout !Paypal by d3bruts1d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If by "Google launches PayPal Rival" you mean, "Google launches a service for merchants to process credit cards". Then yes, this is a PayPal rival. This service does not allow you to transfer money from person-to-person, nor does it allow you to pay by check, bank draft, etc.

    1. Re:Google Checkout !Paypal by strredwolf · · Score: 1

      This is very true. I've gone through GC's website -- there's no p2p money xfer. There's no concept a bank that there is with Paypal. It's only a vendor service that you can use Paypal (after a fashion) to pay with.

      Paypal killer? Yeah right. More like an iBill (and other credit card processor) killer.

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    2. Re:Google Checkout !Paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not allowing paying by other methods than credit card is bad, but anybody that wants the other "features" of PayPal is nuts. Here's a tip. If you want an online bank, use a real online bank.

    3. Re:Google Checkout !Paypal by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      Good post.
      You're right, this is not a PayPal competitor. PayPal's real competitors are StormPay, iKobo, and the like.

      (Yahoo has, or used to to have, a "Yahoo Payments" service that was like PayPal, but I don't know if that service still exists (payments.yahoo.com gives DNS errors, though the old help page still exists: http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/payments/ ).)

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    4. Re:Google Checkout !Paypal by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I suspect that they'll extend it to allow other forms of payment over time, but the real difference is that they don't hold your money like PayPal does; they act as an intermediary in transactions between financial accounts at other institutions.

      It's possible that they'll start doing more of the PayPal features over time. There's no reason they couldn't do person-to-person transfers by accepting a credit card or check and doing direct deposit into the recipient's bank account. But I think they'll avoid actually storing users' money themselves, like PayPal does.

    5. Re:Google Checkout !Paypal by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      It still isn't a PayPal rival. And is there any way to have payapl automatically transfer received money to my bank account? I just do it as soon as I can, and 99.99% of the time my paypal balance is $0.

  35. How about an Ebay alternative too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me be the first to say, I for one welcome our new Google Paypal Rival Overlords.

    With that out of the way, I think a Linux-powered Google alternative to Paypal would be great. But I'd really like to see an alternative to Ebay.

    I don't know how many time I have reset my Ebay and Paypal passwords because I couldn't log in, until I remembered those sites run on IIS, which likes to take weekends off. (Once I got returned to the login screen enough times without explanation, I finally got a clue.)

  36. Google - my secret lover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have my secrets.
    You have my money.
    But where can I upload my soul? Yes, I have googled.

    1. Re:Google - my secret lover by dago · · Score: 1
      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  37. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    In practice, however, most ebay transactions are done with paypal.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  38. Only in the USA by Roy+van+Rijn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember, when you sign up for Google Checkout you can fill in any country you like, but the Terms of Service says:

    - 18 years old or older;
    - capable of entering into a legally binding agreement; and
    - a resident of the United States.

    So only people from the United States are allowed to use it yet :( And most supporting companies don't even ship outside the US.

    1. Re:Only in the USA by fatted · · Score: 2, Funny
      And most supporting companies don't even ship outside the US.
      I think you'll find many U.S. companies ship overseas. Unfortunately most of them define overseas as consisting of Canada AND Mexico.

      Europe who?
  39. Google launches PayPal Rival by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    Google Checkout Launched

    Do we really need a double heading for this story? This kinda reminds me why geeks are usually not tasked with documentation; they don't know anything about page layout. See Wikipedia for more examples.

  40. So if they want to be banks... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, you won't find me going near most of the services offered by the likes of Paypal and now Google until organisations that are acting like banks or credit companies are regulated like them as well. My high street bank and credit card have pretty crappy customer service at times, but compared to some of the things Paypal's been accused off, the other guys are saints.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:So if they want to be banks... by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's why all my Paypal payments go through my credit card. Once Paypal allowed you to use your CC for payment the risks for using it to purchase went down to the same level as any other online transaction because if I have a problem I can simply dispute the paypal charge with my CC company. Not sure how accepting payments via paypal works as I don't sell things online.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:So if they want to be banks... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Question I've been meaning to ask: are debit cards as risky? I'm sure I read somewhere that you can't do chargebacks with them.

    3. Re:So if they want to be banks... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in the UK, neither debit cards nor "credit card cheques" carry the same legal protections as a proper credit card (which are regulated under the relevant consumer credit legislation). But ask your card supplier or a real financial adviser if you want to be really sure.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:So if they want to be banks... by crowemojo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they are accepting credit cards, then they must be affiliated with a merchant bank. It is not possible to accept a credit card without this affiliation. If they are considered a Level 1 merchant by Visa, then they have to go through an annual independent PCI compliance review.

      A level 1 merchant is defined as the following:
      Any merchant-regardless of acceptance channel-processing over 6,000,000 Visa transactions per year.
      Any merchant that has suffered a hack or an attack that resulted in an account data compromise.
      Any merchant that Visa, at its sole discretion, determines should meet the Level 1 merchant requirements to minimize risk to the Visa system.
      Any merchant identified by any other payment card brand as Level 1.

      The PCI Data Security Standard consists of twelve basic requirements and is actually very similar to what is regulated at most banks as per FFIEC guidelines. Every Level 1 merchant must have the following:
      Annual On-site PCI Data Security Assessment performed by QDSPs that are working for a QDSC (individuals that have been certified to perform the review that are working for companies that have qualified to attest to the compliance to the standards)
      Quarterly Network Scan by a qualified scanning vendor. The qualified scanning vendors are screened by Mastercard and are only able to qualify by scanning a controlled environment and producing results that meet the standard that has been established.

      Finally, if there are any doubts, PayPal-Verisign is on the published list of qualified service providers, indicating that they have complied with the standard I mentioned before as a service provider, not just a merchant.

    5. Re:So if they want to be banks... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Question I've been meaning to ask: are debit cards as risky? I'm sure I read somewhere that you can't do chargebacks with them.

      Ten years ago, when electronic debit transactions were still new, that was the case. Now most financial institutions offer protections similar to credit cards. That's not to say that debit card protection is as convenient as credit card protection, though. The disadvantage is that, unlike a straight credit card, you start off with the money gone and must wrangle with the bank to get it back. Credit cards, it's the bank that's out the money and you need only refuse to pay.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:So if they want to be banks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would check with your credit card company. Many (most) do not allow chargebacks against PayPal, as they consider PayPal to be a middleman.

    7. Re:So if they want to be banks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      PayPal charged my account. The item PayPal charged my account for never showed up. So, I issued a chargeback against PayPal and didn't have a problem. I don't care what PayPal did with the vendor that never delivered the item.

  41. No one but my bank by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    is permitted to store my credit card information.

    I do not even shop at sites where I cannot find the option of only entering a CC number for the current transaction or readily delete it as soon as I can.

    You want to avoid being a victim of credit card fraud, then don't increase the odds.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  42. All you need to know by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Informative


    10. Disputes

    GPC will provide various tools to assist Customers in communicating with each other to resolve a dispute that may arise between Buyers and Sellers with respect to their transaction. If Customers are unable to resolve a dispute, we can mediate disputes between buyers and sellers if either party requests assistance. If this occurs, we will review the dispute and propose a non-binding solution, if appropriate. For more detailed information, please see our Frequently Asked Questions.

    GPC may offer a feedback or other ranking system on the Service to assist you in evaluating other Customers of the Service. You acknowledge that any such feedback or ranking system represents solely the opinion of other Customers of the Service, and is not an opinion, representation, or warranty by GPC with respect to other Customers of the Service.

    You agree to release, GPC, Google, and other GPC affiliates, and their agents, contractors, officers and employees, from all claims, demands and damages (actual and consequential) arising out of or in any way connected with a dispute. You agree that you will not involve GPC in any litigation or other dispute arising out of or related to any transaction, agreement, or arrangement with any Seller, other Buyer, advertiser or other third party in connection with the Service. If you attempt to do so, (i) you shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees of GPC, Google, and other GPC affiliates and shall provide indemnification as set forth below, and (ii) the jurisdiction for any such litigation or dispute shall be limited as set forth below. However, nothing in this Terms of Service shall constitute a waiver of any rights, claims or defenses that you may have with respect to a Payment Transaction under the Buyer's card issuer agreement, the card association rules or applicable state and federal laws, such as the federal Truth in Lending Act or the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

    If you are a California resident, you hereby expressly waive California Civil Code 1542, which states: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if not known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor."

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:All you need to know by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When's the last time you called a credit card processor to resolve a disputed charge? You deal with the card issuer. This is no different from any other card processor agreement. Get a grip.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:All you need to know by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um, no try again. If I use my credit card at a store and they charge the wrong amount I first bring it up with them. Then if that doesn't resolve and only then do I go to the credit card company.

      The first thing your issuer will tell you is to put in writing what you've done to resolve the problem which must include what you did with the merchant. Escalating to the issuer is a serious action and doing it over every trivial action is a waste of time.

      So if I use my credit card with google to buy something from you and google screws up, I should be able to go to them to fix it. Since they are effectively the ones selling me the product [the "seller" is just providing it].

      I mean this is like going to Sony because Best Buy charged you wrong on the TV you bought. No, you go to best buy to fix the charge.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:All you need to know by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Um, no try again. If I use my credit card at a store and they charge the wrong amount I first bring it up with them. Then if that doesn't resolve and only then do I go to the credit card company.

      Oh, for god's sake. My argument presumes that the existence of an unresolved "dispute" is the result of the store refusing to make it right.

      So if I use my credit card with google to buy something from you and google screws up, I should be able to go to them to fix it. Since they are effectively the ones selling me the product [the "seller" is just providing it].

      Huh? Google didn't sell you anything. The guy with the actual goods is doing the selling. Google is a payment processing middleman. If the guy sends you a box of rocks instead of a PSP, how is that the middleman's problem? You can't hold someone liable for something over which they have no control.

      I mean this is like going to Sony because Best Buy charged you wrong on the TV you bought. No, you go to best buy to fix the charge.

      What the hell are you talking about? Best Buy is not a card processor, and Google is not a merchant. Nothing is even remotely comparable. Best Buy has a card processing company. You buy a TV and Best Buy charges you wrong, do you call up (say) Card1 Merchant Services to complain about it? No, you go to Best Buy and, when it results in a dispute, you go to your credit card issuer. The middleman, who operates the swipe-reader system, has nothing to do with that process. That's all the Google disclaimer says: if you get ripped off by a sleazebag, take it up with the sleazebag, or take i up with your credit card company. This is how it works everywhere else.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:All you need to know by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      So if I use my credit card with google to buy something from you and google screws up,

      This little bit was so mind-bogglingly dense that I didn't even see it the first time. Where in that disclaimer does it say that Google disavows any fault when they, themselves screw up? It doesn't! It only says that they aren't responsible for you making a bad deal with a third party. So long as they get your money to the seller, their involvement is done.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:All you need to know by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      It happens pretty frequently with Paypal: Paypal in fact states that you will *not* dispute charges on your credit card wtihout calling Paypal (who is the credit card processor here) first. Google's terms releases sellers from the risk of facing chargebacks.

  43. Typo by pr0nbot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The service allows you^H^H^H them to track all your orders and shipping in one place"

    Regards,

    The nation's #1 tinfoil hat supplier!

  44. Not likely, at least here in the UK by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Yet google is advertising this as a replacement for credit cards on all of your purchases.

    That seems unlikely, at least here in the UK, where credit card companies become jointly liable with the seller for purchases within a fairly wide price range. As a result, you'll find PC magazines and the like usually recommend using a credit card to pay for major purchases, because if the seller goes bust before shipping, you can get your money back from the credit card company. The card companies are unsurprisingly reluctant to pay up too often, but they know that in genuine cases they can be forced to in court, so if a company you're dealing with does fold, using a credit card does provide useful protection. Unless Google's facilities fall under the same consumer credit laws, I doubt they'll take much custom away from credit card companies on this side of the pond.

    Obligatory disclaimer: If you get your legal or financial advice on Slashdot, you're a very silly person. The above was pretty much general knowledge the last time I checked, but if it matters to you, go read the small print for yourself.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  45. It's about time! by infestedsenses · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see someone finally budding into PayPal's monopoly. It's unfortunate that it's Google, as they already know enough about me that I don't need to be handing them my buying habits as well, but they are currently the only ones I can see with enough market power to actually be a relevant player. I just hope that once they have disarmed PayPal a bit, the market will become more open and will welcome more alternatives. This is probably a bit utopian but one can always hope.

    I've experienced first hand what happens when you have one monopolist controlling a large portion of the online market. Since my last name is apparently the same as some arab terrorist's name (apparently your name makes you a potential criminal nowadays), PayPal completely blocked my account, and it's become quite a nuisance. I'm glad I didn't have any credit on that account or PayPal would have my money in a stronghold (this should be illegal but that's a different story...). I don't have a credit card and don't plan on getting one, so I can only shop on websites that debit directly off my bank account, which usually means only shopping within Germany. Good to see some more international choices popping up.

    1. Re:It's about time! by Gwyneth_Llewelyn · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually, Google AdSense can use bank accounts as well to pay for money earned from your ads (yes, and it works on non-US banks perfectly as well). So if they have this technology to interface with banking systems, they might add it to Google Checkout as well.

      Actually, I used the "bank interfacing" first with Google AdSense, only to find later that it was available on PayPal as well :-D

      --
      "I'm not building a game. I'm building a new country." -- Philip "Linden" Rosedale, interview to Wired, 2004-05-08
  46. Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look at all the stuff you can't buy or sell. Some of it is clearly justified, some of it not;

    http://checkout.google.com/seller/content_policies .html

    More restrictive than ebay in some areas.

    1. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, you are not allowed to sell "ID theft protection services". ROFL

    2. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Offensive goods Literature, products or other materials that:

      * Defame or slander any person or groups of people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, or other factors
      * Encourage or incite violent acts
      * Promote intolerance or hatred
      No sales of the christian bible then!

      That list is too restrictive, the entire point of online payment solutions is convienience. By publishing such a broad and overly restrictive list of non-salable items, google are opening themselves up for major headaches down the road. I find the bible offensive and there's 2000 years of evidence supporting my objections. I'm sure some ID-proponents would have similar objections to a book on evolution. Google are over-reaching, it's really none of their business what people buy using the service. If people are trading in child porn, they should inform the relevent authorities; anything else is a farce.

    3. Re:Not only that by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder why Google and Paypal don't want porn to be sold using their service.

      Just think of the huge market they're abandoning; if porn sites could use paypal or google for payment, many more folks might be willing to to pay for porn since they won't be giving their credit card info to seedy companies!

      But for some odd reason they forbid it. Strange...

      -Z

    4. Re:Not only that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's really none of their business what people buy using the service.

      Please go seacrh some news source for the word "lawsuit." That will explain why google is being paranoid.

    5. Re:Not only that by stu42j · · Score: 1

      I think that credit cards generally charge higher fees to porn sites because they are considered higher risk or something. There probably have a higher rate of fraud and chargebacks.

    6. Re:Not only that by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "No honey, I have no idea what the charge from 'midget prostitute webcams' is. I think we need to change our credit card number and report fraud."

  47. I predict the end of Google Checkout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, seriously. Google Checkout will have a short life.

    Anyone who thought that storing your credit card info in one place is a good idea, already would have tried PayPal. That is the market for this product. So, Checkout has to attract those folks using PayPal. If one multi-billion dollar company (eBay) is already managing someone's online payment process, WHY should that person fill up the same informtion in Google Checkout, specially when it is more costly than PayPal ?

    R.I.P., Google Checkout. Try coming up with new ideas next time.

  48. Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oops!
    We're sorry. We are unable to process order requests from Syria at this time. If you believe that you have reached this page in error, please contact us.

    This sucks, I was hoping to replace the crappy pre-paid CC services I was using with Google, but oh well...
  49. Death Threat by elmCitySlim · · Score: 1

    "Fuc*ing Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. We're going to fuc*ing bury that guy. I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to fuc*ing kill Google!" - Steve Balmer talking to Pierre Omidyar on a riverboat.

  50. Parent should be modded up by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    First off, I like google and will over time use this new service. Why? because I do trust that that they will get it right and will handle security correctly. But when it comes to customer service, well, it sucks. Their attitude is basically, that they will provide a service and do it right. And they do it better than anybody. But when it fails, they make companies like MS, Qwest, and Comcast look ok (and that is damn hard to do).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  51. seller howto? by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

    I'm all set to pay for things via checkout, but despite clicking on the help for like 10 minutes, I couldn't figure out how to become a checkout seller... Clearly I'm missing the most important link.

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    1. Re:seller howto? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      You can't have looked very hard, link is on the bottom of the video page

      https://checkout.google.com/sell

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  52. Magazines.com Glitch by baharris18 · · Score: 1

    According to Google Checkout http://www.google.com/buy/m.html Magazines.com http://www.magazines.com/ is offering "$10 off your order of $20 or more from these stores, enter the coupon code listed below during Google Checkout. (Discount valid once per store)" So far, I have purchased (and checked out each seperately) 3 magazines, and entered the "google10" code each time, and got the $10 off each time. Time to renew all your magazines!

  53. 1,9% and $0,30 ? by mochan_s · · Score: 5, Informative

    The 1,9% and $0,30 rate for Paypal is if you recieve more than $100,000 to your account and you have a merchant account!

    Normally, it's 2.9% + $0.30 USD. https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_display -receiving-fees-outside

    1. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Drew-NC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is 100% correct. I run a small web store and we use PayPal to process orders. We are paying 2.9% + $.30 per transaction. I would love to switch to google, but I see one issue. With PayPal people can place orders on my site, pay with a credit card, and not have a PayPal account. PayPal just processes the card. When google will let my customers pay without having a google account I will switch.

    2. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ALso, The only way you can accept money from Google is to either purchase ads for your web site, OR sell your item directly via google's interface. At least that is how I see it.

      Not having a google account to accept purchase is a big problem.

      --
      Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
    3. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Youre right.... And that's still too expensive for real retailers (such as myself) to consider using.

    4. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least Google accounts are easy to sign up for and manage. I have a PayPal account. I think it even has some money in it still (a few bucks). I have the hardest time getting any PayPal transactions to work - and I work in enterprise web development, so its not as if I'm a stranger to the system. I couldn't imagine forcing someone to sign up for a PP account, and I agree that a Google account is still too much of a requirement, but at least its a lot more reasonable.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    5. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my last paypal transaction (buying), the paypal web page said I would need to sign up for an account for my next transaction. So Paypal may also be taking the "account required" route.

    6. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When google will let my customers pay without having a google account I will switch.

      I don't understand "switch." You make it sound like an either/or decision. Can't you offer both? "If you have a Google Checkout account, go here, if you don't, go to PayPal - Thanks and come again." That way, every time someone does use Google, you'll save .9% and when they don't, you'll see no difference. It will have two benefits - you'll save the .9% immediately, and you'll be encouraging people to find out about Google so that more people will use it in the future.

    7. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Drew-NC · · Score: 3, Informative

      True but it will require a major re-write of my web site, the use of a separate shopping cart software, find a way to move money from google to PayPal (we use PayPal as a checking account too) and upgrading to PayPal Payments Pro at $20 a month. PayPal Payments Standard does not integrate with external shopping cart software, you use PayPal form code and they provide the shopping cart. I expect many small web stores are in the same boat I am in. I remember that not too long ago PayPal required customers to sign up for accounts too. I expect google will change their ways before too long.

    8. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Phroggy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      When google will let my customers pay without having a google account I will switch.

      You don't have to switch - you can support both. Customers who already have a Google account can pay through Google's new system; customers who already have a PayPal account can use PayPal; customers who aren't already signed up with anything can go through PayPal as well, or can sign up with Google.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:1,9% and $0,30 ? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I agree. One can use both services. Zen Cart offers several different payment module options which the customer can choose how to pay. Now what someone needs to do is code a Google Checkout option.

  54. Now if only... by Slovenian6474 · · Score: 1

    ...newegg accepted this i may actually use it.

    1. Re:Now if only... by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Some might ask "Why use this when newegg flat out excepts your credit card?"

      I see why this could be a very useful service. People, earlier in this thread, were complaining about all their data stored in a central spot (googleplex) and loosing all their CC info (as well as other info) if their google password is comprimised. However, I think it would be safer overall to trust google (for now, seeing how they are not evil - yet) than it would be to store your credit card info in ALL of the sites you shop at (Amazon, Newegg, zipzoomfly, etc). If you store it in one spot you stand less of a chance of having it comprimised, at least thats how I see it.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
    2. Re:Now if only... by Slovenian6474 · · Score: 1

      Very good point. Personally, i'd just like to try it out, but i don't need anything offered at any of the current list of stores. I do like the the idea of my credit card only being in one site rather than the slew of sites i order from.

  55. GTip, GMicropay ? by mjpg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With a decent micropayment system Google could really change the web. It's a shame this is not it. It's likely Google could blend micropayments into sites pretty well with their AJAX skills - and their infrastructure should mean that the implementation cost was marginal (for them). And search could benefit. A micropayment is a pretty good vote for a site.

  56. Not much of a rival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To compete with PayPal they need to:

    Allow sending money between users
    Allow transfer to and from bank account
    Provide affordable fraud protection

  57. $10 chargeback risk for sellers. by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was interested in this as a seller, but I'm somewhat wary of the $10 chargeback cost they charge the seller if a buyer either ask refund or is just defrauding you.
    Typically this means that if a seller is the victim of fraud, (s)he loses the item sold AND has to pay $10 because of it.
    Using this for "micro"-payments of, say, $5, would be pretty dangerous considering the risk of fraud.
    I've been selling through another service for years now and thus have some indication of the amount of fraud happening on the internet. I may still try google CheckOut, but probably only for $10+ payments so valid orders may cover the risk of fraudulent ones.

    Besides, the service is only available in the U.S.A. anyway, so I'd have to wait for it. Odd, considering AdWords and AdSense are available pretty much worldwide.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  58. What underwhelming vendors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I had a look at the list of vendors. Talk about underwhelming. What were they doing, trying to find every obscure/scam place and sign them up first? Why not get Amazon in on this?

  59. Not banks, no oversight by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Any company acting like a bank or credit union should be under the laws governing such. PayPal wants to pretend it's secure and honest without actually having to be so. Shut them down until they file the appropriate papers and post the appropriate securities to ensure their "transactions".

    1. Re:Not banks, no oversight by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      If the added regulations and red tape make their costs and rates go up (and what else could happen?), then no thanks. You stick with the regulated banks you trust, and I'll keep using Paypal, which is so much cheaper and more convenient than the banks' ways (wire transfers).

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  60. Oh yeah, PayPal is definitely doomed by snowwrestler · · Score: 1, Funny

    Americans spent $25 billion online in the first quarter of 2006 alone. Obviously a market that size can only support one big player.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  61. Incorporated Google threatens by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    not just PayPal as a payments engine but increasingly obsoletes cc:Visa/Mastercard's space in "online transactions". Incorporated Google is separated from "realWorld transactions" of Visa/Mastercard by lack of legislative statute.

    Two payments systems dominate in the US. The "check system" used in banking and "credit system" Visa/Mastercard/AmExpress. Google, Inc. will bring its market weight to the legislative process to create a third payments system without the burdens found in credit law and banking law.

    The question is whether they will "internationalize" or "nationalize" their platform in law.

    1. Re:Incorporated Google threatens by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Go to http://checkout.google.com./ Log in with your Google account. The next page you see is a form that won't let you pass without providing a Visa, Mastercard, Discover, or American Express card number.

      Google is facilitating checkouts, not providing a new medium for money exchange.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  62. Sticking with Paypal... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dig Google, man do I ever but I think I have reached my limit as to how tightly I integrate myself with Google, inc. Google IS a publicly traded company and it's only a matter of time before "Do no evil"(tm) becomes "We do less evil than everyone else" (tm). Why? Because Google is publicly traded and their only real obligation is to their stockholders. No matter of hipster-doofus-coolness culture trumps that. Just look at Apple...

    They have transitioned themselved from being cool to being fairly evil (sweatshops for iPod manufacture, closing off the Darwin source)

    Besides do you think for one second that eBay will make integrating auctions easy with Google? Of course not....

    Paypal does suck but all of these services do and odds are Google's will too.

    1. Re:Sticking with Paypal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They have transitioned themselved from being cool to being fairly evil (sweatshops for iPod manufacture, closing off the Darwin source)

      Oh, how they bleat. Take a little bit of information garnered from headlines and the opinions of people based the opinions of others. Fail to follow it investigate or follow it up and get to the facts. The end result FUD wins! No wonder computing evolution has slowed.

    2. Re:Sticking with Paypal... by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      Apple was never exactly a big sharer to begin with... In fact, IIRC their initial downfall was because the IBM PC clones were open systems allowing you to upgrade, fiddle with the components, purchase them from anyone; whereas you could only buy Apple components from Apple. There's a reason why I never liked Apple. It's because they never liked their customers.

    3. Re:Sticking with Paypal... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Google is at worst much much much less evil than most companies. That's fine by me.

      I don't care about eBay auctions. If eBay doesn't sign on, then I'll use another auction site that does.

      I don't understand your last argument. Everything sucks now so it will suck forever? That's kind of what I thought about all webmail services until GMail came along.

    4. Re:Sticking with Paypal... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Google's obligation to their stockholders is to stay everyone's favorite company(tm), because being everyone's favorite company is the perfect advertisement. The best way to do that is to keep "Do[ing] no evil." I don't see why they would suddenly try to screw themselves over just because Google is publicly traded..

    5. Re:Sticking with Paypal... by RandUser · · Score: 1

      If you're going to purchase things online, why not pick the "We do less evil than everyone else" company? That would, to me, be the best option. And on Apple, the sweatshop allegations are against a company Apple hired for the manufacturing so I'd hardly _directly_ blame them for it and the Darwin source is only _currently_ closed for _x86_ hardware - not exactly evil by any stretch. I'll probably switch as soon as I want to make a purchase on something that I can buy through Google - PayPal has an abysmal record with customer service/dealing with problems and I will be extremely happy to drop them (assuming Google can offer a good service, which I think is likely). And as a final note, it's getting freaking difficult to find deals on things I want from eBay. -shrugs- Hopefully this will offer some much needed competition with PayPal and benefit legitimate end user buyers and sellers.

  63. GPC Not A Banking Institution by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It says it is not a banking institution. So, it has lower rates and has "Google" in its name.

    No other difference from Paypal?

    It seems they use their brand value and lower rates against Paypal. Hope we won't have another Google Groups in hand since this thing is purely related to real life money.

    On Google Groups, you can pollute usenet with any kind of criminal scams, pyramid schemes and they send "Google does not censor groups" type of "we don't care" message in politically correct way. Deja could handle abuse while usenet was really huge compared to today but as a billion dollar company they can't.

    I hope they start working with Spamcop.net , Antiphishing.org and fraudwatchinternational.com right now. I hope they recorded all their URLs/IPs as interested parties and we (reporting users) don't see "ISP does not want to receive reports regarding" type of stuff at spamcop.net as first days of Paypal.

  64. Really useful for eBay sellers? by jonatha · · Score: 1

    From the description of the way a seller uses Checkout to obtain payment it is not at all clear how someone who simply sells on eBay and does not otherwise have a web presence can use the new service.

    It looks to me like they're targeting PayPal's high-end business, not eBay powersellers....

    --
    The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
  65. I welcome checkout by acurism · · Score: 0

    Thank god I can use something else than Paypal... I was a victim of Identity theft using them and you think they would have good customer service cosidering what I went through, yea right. They were rude and even accused me of fraud. I will using Google Checkout from now on. Thank you Google!

  66. tired of anything FleeBay, I'll jump ship by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    Anything with traction and new is better than the stale bending over one gets with Meg inserts her fist everytime one of my customer's or myself go to use PayPal. I'm glad to see a viable and momentus offering alternative.

  67. Content Restrictions by us7892 · · Score: 1

    They have quite a list of the obvious stuff that is restricted from being purhcased via Google Checkout; of course, nothing illegal or nasty.
    https://checkout.google.com/seller/content_policie s.html

    Quite a list...I'd have not thought of a lot of these. Seems like they could categorize you into one of these restricted groups somehow, if they just don't like what you're selling, or you piss them off.

    1. Re:Content Restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that doesn't even cover all of it. According to this page other things are off limits as well including "cell phones, market place items, digital downloads, magazines, extended warranties, pre-orders, on order items, items requiring the collection of Ca recycling fees and other special items".

    2. Re:Content Restrictions by nytes · · Score: 1
      From the link:
      "Subscriptions Subscriptions to online or offline content (including magazines and newspapers)"
      Yet magazines.com is one of the companies offering $10 off coupons for using Gpay?
      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  68. State Income Tax by ThumperByTrade · · Score: 1

    I'm going to stay away from any service that will keep track of all my online purchases. I know that my state income tax always wants me to file all my internet purchases so that I can pay them sales tax. I can just see this as the next big government pressure to use internet companies to snoop into our business.

    Amazingly I average about 3 hours a day (not counting work) on the internet and I've never purchased anything through that medium. As long as I stay away from services like this, it will stay that way.

  69. US Only by ggeens · · Score: 3, Informative

    The registration form lets you choose a country, but the terms and conditions state that you must be a US citizen. I didn't click on the "I agree" button.

    Flashback to the early days of Paypal: Someone pointed me to this new service, and when I get to the registration form, it had "Country: USA" hard coded in the HTML.

    --
    WWTTD?
    1. Re:US Only by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      It says 'a resident of the United States', not a citizen. What does this mean that the 'Country' entry on the registration form is to indicate? Nationality? Country of birth? Country in which your credit card is registered?

      I'm not a resident of the US, anyway, so looks like I can't sign up without breaking the T&C.

    2. Re:US Only by dshk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sellers must be from the USA too, and "Country: USA" is actually hard coded HTML on the vendor signup form...
      Btw. PayPal still don't accept vendors from the new EU member countries. You can buy but not sell if you live there. Considering that the percentage of credit card fraud is significantly lower in these countries then in the old member countries I feel this diffenentiation is quite unashamed.
      Not that it makes too much difference, in our shop customers can pay using about 6-7 different payment services depending on their country (including Paypal although indirectly), but 90% of the purchases are done using credit cards.
      Anyway, PayPal made me so angry that I intended to integrate Google's payment service as soon as possible.

    3. Re:US Only by Gwyneth_Llewelyn · · Score: 1
      Google's most excellent customer support promptly answered to my request for information:

      Hello Gwyneth, Thank you for your email. At this time, only merchants with a United States address and bank account can integrate and process transactions through Google Checkout. We look forward to making the service more widely available in the near future. Sincerely, The Google Checkout Merchant Support Team

      So that's it. Waiting time for us non-US residents.

      --
      "I'm not building a game. I'm building a new country." -- Philip "Linden" Rosedale, interview to Wired, 2004-05-08
  70. Soc Sec #s by panxerox · · Score: 1

    Checkout will never go anywhere because they require a soc sec # to sell.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re: Soc Sec #s by cptgrudge · · Score: 1
      Checkout will never go anywhere because they require a soc sec # to sell.


      That's for individuals. Incorporate and get a federal tax ID number instead. Smart people should be incorporating anyway, because it reduces your liability. With a sole proprietorship, entities suing you can go after your personal assets as well.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  71. Issues I encountered trying to sign up by ZP-Blight · · Score: 1

    There are quite a few issues:

    U.S. residents only:
    The country field on the registration page only gives a U.S. option.

    Refunding doesn't refund you the 20 cents transaction fee:
    If you refund payment, they keep the 20 cents (you get back the 2%).

    Support is purchase-centric:
    As a seller, trying to use the "contact us" link, even from the seller sign-up pages transfers you to a purchase contact-us page. This is misleading.

    Chargeback Protection:
    Google say they will fight for you on chargeback fraud (stolen credit cards used to purchase your products, or just people being a-holes and saying they didn't buy your product, which can be a piece of software and may not actually contain any physical trace).

    Comment:
    I'm really surprised about the "U.S. Only" thing, we use Google's AdSense on our pages and google sends out a check every month no-problem (we're not U.S. based), I don't see why it's any problem appending the sale revenue to the ad revenue check. Hopefully this will be resolved soon.

    --
    Zoom Player Lead Dev.
  72. Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by turnstyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google Checkout lets buyers hide their email addresses from sellers -- but, it seems fair that sellers should get buyers' email addresses (PayPal doesn't similarly hide emails).

    It also seems like hiding the email address from the seller may also encourage more fraud (especially for digially distributed works).

    So, at first glance, Google Checkout seems worse than PayPal from the seller's perspective -- it'll be interesting to see if sellers choose to stick with PayPal for reasons such as these...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by IAmTheDave · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So, at first glance, Google Checkout seems worse than PayPal from the seller's perspective

      Actually, I'm inclined to disagree. There is a full API, and you can practically (as a seller) hide the fact you're using Google to process payments from the user if you wish. I'm writing an online store right now, and integration with Google appears to be less costly than having to get a merchant bank account and integrate with annoying APIs like Paymentech.

      I like that Google placed the service on both a Paypal and full-out merchant level. Now I can do all payment processing on my site via the available web API, but still put the Google badge on the site to put buyers at ease.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    2. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by lgw · · Score: 1

      If a seller won't use Checkout because they can't spam my email address, I'll be glad to avoid them! Checkout sounds good to me.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by turnstyle · · Score: 1

      I don't quite see how sellers can use the Checkout API to hide the fact that Google is processing transactions if buyers need an account with Google (see here).

      Google's API certainly may be more flexible that PayPal's, but it can't be as flexible as using your own merchant account through a gateway.

      And I just don't think sellers will be happy about Google hiding them from their buyers' email addresses...

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    4. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by Duwke · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to the API?

    5. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by Baricom · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by celticmonkey · · Score: 1

      Here's an impressive list of sellers that are already using this:

      http://www.google.com/buy/m.html

      This service is definitely geared towards attracting sellers rather than buyers, and that's where the income will come from. In the near future, you will see so many google checkout logos on sellers' websites that as a buyer you will end up using this almost by default.

      Compare that with paypal. Many buyers have accounts but can't find many places to spend other than with ebay sellers. Not many non-ebay sellers seem to find it attractive.

      Why would a seller want to turn over a portion of website sales over to paypal when google checkout is practically giving it away?

    7. Re:Sellers will prefer PayPal to Google Checkout by dipskinny · · Score: 1

      an impressive list of sellers?

      I see about 100 online stores. I'm not impressed ... yet.

  73. Wow, I'm just stunned by strider44 · · Score: 1

    Wait a second, does that mean that the wild speculation that was on Slashdot a month or so ago was actually right?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/29/005323 1

    I'm just stunned, flabberghasted.

  74. Now google just needs some filtering by dindi · · Score: 1

    Oh wait, google already filters ebay listings to some extent, otherwise all the results would be full of *NEW* L@@K sealed shipped DVD shipped from Hong Kong.

    But now, all the "review" "buy" "compare" searches can end up in one of these stores, good work Sergei.

    Oh did I forget to mention, that you receive credit from your Adwords spendings to compensate seller costs?

    And that paypal charges 3.5%, not the mentioned sub dollar amount? If you have a merchant account at PP you know it anyway, for the rest it is not that important.

    I am looking at the API right now, all XML communication, seems easy to integrate, and is already included with some ecommerce packages ....

  75. Interesting projection, but... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    100 sales/wk is pretty big volume, and very few ebay sellers come anywhere close to that. However, if the new Google CheckOut is combined with with something like Froogle or Googlebase (or your own website), the savings over ebay/paypal are substantially higher. That's because most ebay sellers have nowhere near a 100% sell-through rate, and ebay gets its cut whether you sell or not. There are already two other listing services that I like, OnlineAuction.com (no listing or FV fees, and now more than 10% the size of ebay and still growing), and Blujay.com (free listings, and I have sold several items there). Now, with the addition of other services of Google (GoogleBase and Froogle... and perhaps more in the future), it looks like it may be viable to reduce my presence on ebay to just a few higher-demand items, and do most of my selling elsewhere. Multiply that by a few hundred thousand people with approximately my ebay volume, and you will see a huge dip in ebay over the next few months.

    1. Re:Interesting projection, but... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Are there any decent tools (web-based or otherwise) for giving single point-of-access (particularly, for searching) to multiple auction services? If Amazon zShops could be incorporated, even better.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  76. Meda spin. by bobs666 · · Score: 1

    drudgereports
    headline states

    In its quest to 'organize the world's information,' GOOGLE now wants to keep track of your credit card number and where you live...


    I Personally welcome our new overlords.

    In other words,
    if you can't trust Google who can you trust.
    It is not the Media we trust.
    But I can understand why the Media want the
    new Internet printing press broken, so they
    control all the information we get.

    The Media spin on Net Integrity has the same
    goal, to make us slaves of the Media Filters.

  77. Protection for virtual goods by wilmheath · · Score: 1

    I wonder if gpay will cover sellers of virtual goods such as mmorpg's or virtual card games such as magic the gathering online.

  78. Google URL parameters by Merdalors · · Score: 1
    Would you kindly point me to where those URL parameters are documented on Google Maps?

    I'm not talking about the Google Map API: that requires registration & a license key.

    I want to programmatically launch a map query with a simple HTTP request.

    Thanks.

    --
    Slashdot entertains. Windows pays the mortgage.
    1. Re:Google URL parameters by Threni · · Score: 1

      I have no idea. I just clicked `link to this map` or something. I guess you could do that to a few different locations and see what's going on.

  79. Ebay Interface by Xichekolas · · Score: 1

    That is because every time eBay tries to change things, their sellers pitch a hissy fit. I can understand that when you are doing a lot of ebay business, you don't want to have to constantly relearn where they moved such and such option or setting, but eBay has tried to modernize... it just can't stand up to it's own sellers. What amazes me is that they have owned PayPal for this long and still haven't integrated any better than they have. Monopoly breeds complacency.

    --

    Self-referential Sigs are cool on /. these days...

    54

  80. No way... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    There is no way I would ever leave any more than absolutely necessary in my PayPal account. 4.7% is nowhere near enough to offset the risk. With their history of arbitrary and random screwing of accountholders (with no recourse, since they are an unregulated 'bank'), I simply don't leave any more money in that account than I can afford to lose. I also back it with a separate bank account, which I also sweep on a regular basis, since they can just go into that bank account whenever they feel like it.

  81. simplify by kurtis25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google wants to track data flow; they want to see how you get to sites, what you look at and what you buy. This system allows them to watch how money flows in a controlled market place. I would assume eventually they will hold money and you can buy and sell with it. IE you could give your kids 100$ in their account, they could buy a DVD for 15$ and now have 85$ but sell two CDs at 10$ each and have 110$. This will eventually eliminate the $.20 fee (or make it Google profit). It will be come a commodities market of sorts, I will watch Tom Cruise jump up on a couch and decide TC movies will become hot sellers so I will quickly move my money to take ownership of his films and put them up for sale at a higher price. You people will buy them from me and I will have a profit which I will re-invest in Hillary for President bumper sticker because I think those will become popular. No transactions will appear on my credit card statement, I will have essential bought a commodity with Google money, which I can cash out like stocks.

  82. One again, analysts know sh*t in computing... by pierreact · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and prove it !
    Analysts compare Google/Paypal to for example Visa/Mastercard living peacefully together, while others predict the end of Paypal.


    Any one of you ever compared Visa/Mastercard ? I asked around me after reading this to some people around... a card is a card, as long it works...

    A site like paypal is different it's more like a bank you choose from, people will choose on this differently, an other thing is abot security, do you feel safe with paypal ? I don't. So much that i certainly will close my paypal account (There's years i want to close it but they don't let me) and go to google.

    Is google more secure ? I don't know, but the fact is i never seen google down.
  83. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by LifeWithJustin · · Score: 1

    I know right, like, when I go to my corner store it is likeso unfair that I have to use green-backs. Uh, stupid store like why can't I just use colorful money, you know right? I can use it in uh Canada. Like why can't they just they do what I want! Like, what-ev!

    pashawl

    This message has been brought to you by the stereo-typical valley airhead.

    What's my point with all of this? Simple even if (and it's not) PayPal was the only way you could make a purchase at eBay, they have the right to make it so, it's their company, you could always get what you are looking for elsewhere.

  84. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by lgw · · Score: 1

    Why would you leave any money in any account that PayPal knows about? Do they do something to prevent you from instantly tranferring the money from your sales to your real checking account?

    I won't give PayPal my cheching details even as a buyer, so I'm curious.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  85. Visa/Mastercard Living Peacefully Together by fobbman · · Score: 1

    "Analysts compare Google/Paypal to for example Visa/Mastercard living peacefully together"

    It's easy to live peacefully together when you're owned by the same parent company (BofA).

  86. Your wrong about why... by Serapth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Paypal isnt so much the most popular service because it's "easy"

    Many other services are just as easy to use as Paypal. No the biggest reasons are:
    - Its "the brand" so far as online payments go. Most people use paypal, so other people get brought in my default.
    - Its trusted. For online payments, this is a HUGE deal.
    - Its cheap. Really, look at what people have to pay for online banking. If you want to setup an e-commerce website, alot of payment gateways charge a monthly fee, then take a huge percentage of your revinue. Plus, payout rates ( how fast you get your cash )are much higher with Paypal then most gateways.
    - It acts as a credit card proxy, so if you have a MC or Visa, you can pay with Paypal without the fear of giving out your credit card number.
    - Its in bed with eBay. Alot of peoples first need for a payment service is because they bought something on eBay. Once they have an eBay account, if they buy something else online, why sign up for a different service when the one you use already works?

    So, there are many reasons beyond "it's easy" that Paypal is popular.

    1. Re:Your wrong about why... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      PayPal also lets me buy an item from a private citizen at auction, off Craigslist, etc. Few other services (in the US) let you do this with any level of protection to the buyer. (Western Union and money orders offer no protection.) Until Google lets me do that, it hasn't replaced or even rivaled PayPal.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Your wrong about why... by bareshiyth · · Score: 1
      Add another reason: The money (moneys I've collected from sales on ebay) I leave in Paypal "money market" account has generally gotten 2 or 3 times the interest I'd get from a bank savings or CD, and all this with no further (past the sale on ebay) effort on my part.

      And in my mind, all those other "easy's" are worth a lot. "Easy's" like quick transactions, notifications of payments, provision of invoices, verified credit cards and addresses, et.

      And as a matter of fact (or luck?), I've yet to have any problem (about 3 years and 100 sales and several purchases on ebay) with Paypal.

  87. Mod parent down (I'm wrong) by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    Didn't have my coffee yet :) I messed up *my* math.
    Regards,
    Steve

    1. Re:Mod parent down (I'm wrong) by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      That's okay - I did worse yesterday here ...

      Stupid mistake in subtraction, of all things. Maybe I should apply for a job at NASA.

  88. Makes it easy for the US Govt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than having to go to Paypal *and* Google, now they'll just have to go to Google. So they can sic all the lawyers, GAO, and Attorney General on one company. They'll get all your searches, payments, and services -- probably in a single spreadsheet. Cross-referenced, no doubt.

    Sounds like a good gawd dam plan to me. I feel stoked, as an American. I am proud to be a part of this plan.

    Let's do it!

  89. This is cool but... by j3one · · Score: 1

    I think I will hold out for the google chip...

  90. 'ours is the standard' by @madeus · · Score: 1

    We have the biggest army, therefore ours is the standard.

    With an approach like that, you must work for Microsoft.

    As proof that's bogus, I would refer to something like the retarded date format which common in the US (MM/DD/YY as opposed to YYYY-MM-DD (ISO standard) or even DD/MM/YY (which is the most commonly used form internationally)).

    Just because the US uses one method, doesn't make it the standard.

    Firepower ultimately decides most things.

    I don't think you've really been paying attention to the last 50 years of American involvement in international affairs.

  91. No subscriptions/recurring payments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google appears to be missing recurring payments/subscription services in their program. What about those of us who want to use google checkout for member based websites and/or pay-per-month services?

    1. Re:No subscriptions/recurring payments? by some1somewhere · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I do not see that they have this.

      And they don't even support overseas orders/sellers.

      --
      **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  92. Is the bible excluded? by SauroNlord · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    --Cannot sell: Offensive goods Literature, products or other materials that: * Defame or slander any person or groups of people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, or other factors * Encourage or incite violent acts * Promote intolerance or hatred Does this mean that many religious texts are prohibited from being sold?

  93. Correction!!!! by Zelph · · Score: 2, Informative

    PayPal charges 2.9%, not 1.9%. The only people who get the 1.9% rate are those who deal over 100,000 PER MONTH.

  94. Use one of the online gold repositories instead by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    People use PayPal because Ebay demand that they do. Crucially paypal means that you don't have to give bank details to customers/suppliers.

    There's e-gold, GoldMoney etc. They're basically banks, can do instant payments. The difference being you can actually get your hands on the gold.

    --
    Deleted
  95. What? No Beta?! by jcjones86 · · Score: 1

    Might this be the first public Google service offered without a beta since the original search engine? Woohoo! Then again, I doubt they'd use the word "beta" around anything storing consumer credit card numbers.

  96. The economics of it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who pays depends on the slope of the demand curve, which is a fancy way of saying whether the merchants can raise prices without losing business.

    Put a 50% tax on scrub brushes, and the price won't go up because no seller would risk having all his customers buy mops instead. Put a 50% tax on gasoline, and the sellers will cheerfully pass it along in full.

    In general the burden of a tax gets split between seller and buyer in a ratio that depends on how much the market will bear.

  97. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even leaving aside the moronic notion that you are "forced" to do anything on Ebay, do you understand the difference between "forced to use paypal" and "most people choose to use paypal"?

  98. What about donations? by Ougarou · · Score: 1

    PayPal has a large number of "Donate" buttons on the web. Is a donation button going to be part of the checkout system? Or has anybody any word on it becoming part of AdWords?
    Until this is known, I can't see it could kill PayPal at all.

  99. government electronic currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than pay google/paypal/visa 2-5% everytime you spend electronic money, the government should control its own currency system.

    Imagine if paper currency was private.

    1. Re:government electronic currency by Distan · · Score: 1

      Technically, paper currency is private. It is printed by the federal reserve bank, which is owned by member banks and is not a branch of the government.

  100. Content Policies vs. Featured Sellers by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1
    I just signed up, but I took the time to read the Content Policies, aka "Unacceptable product categories". It's a large list, ranging from the obvious ("Counterfeit and unauthorized goods") to the head-scratchers ("Subscriptions").

    Then, when I signed up, I was presented with a list of online retailers where I can get $10 off a $20 purchase thanks to their participation. Third from the bottom:

    Magazines.com Coupon code: google10

    A quick click to the site revealed that magazines.com is, indeed, a site that calls itself "your subscription headquarters". I'm trying to figure out how this fits with Google's definition of the forbidden item: "Subscriptions to online or offline content (including magazines and newspapers)"

    Left hand, meet right hand?

    Also, there's another head-scratcher:
    Occult goods: Materials, goods or paraphernalia for use in satanic, sacrificial, or related practices

    That's an awfully broad definition. What if I buy a chicken? Does a communion wafer count as "sacrificial paraphernalia"?
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Content Policies vs. Featured Sellers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Occult goods"

      holy crap!

      way to offend us wiccans

      whats next, you're not allowed to search on google unless you worship jesus?

      i love google and have used it for years but that alone may make me start using something else.

  101. "Others predict the end of paypal", yes but by voxel · · Score: 1

    I predict the end of Google. :P

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  102. How slick is that promo? by talexb · · Score: 1

    Slick, slicker, slickest.

    That is wicked good stuff. Whoever does their Marketing gets a gold star. Entertaining, informative, reassuring, clean, neat, clever, funny, and memorable. Very, very cool.

    Yet another fascinating example of a piggyback strategy. As long as Google's star shines brightly, they are going to do very, very well.

    Alex

  103. It's off to a poor start so far by chroma · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I just tried registering as a seller on Google Checkout. I get the following error when entering my total sales and EIN:

    Oops!
    An error occurred while processing your request.

    Apparently, I'm not the only one having problems with this new service:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=189880&cid=156 27138

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    1. Re:It's off to a poor start so far by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      What would happen as a buyer? Oops, we charged all your linked credit cards $10,000, sorry for the inconvenience. But who cares, Google got 2% of the transaction.

      I think any system involving money should be flawless, or as near it as possible. I realize this is just about registering as a seller, but I will wait until the "beta" status has left the building before I go and attach any financial details to my Google account.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  104. Even better, no minimum Savings up to 4.95%... by Optic7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bankrate.com keeps track of the highest yeld savings accounts in the country, along with many other rates, like mortgage, credit card, car loan, etc.

    1. Re:Even better, no minimum Savings up to 4.95%... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bankrate often misses many of the best rates. This bank deals blog has three 5%+ internet savings accounts that Bankrate doesn't even have in its list.

  105. 45 days for a paypal complaint by 512k · · Score: 1

    90 days for a complaint someone files through their credit card company

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
  106. Paypal is *not* 1.9% by kefler · · Score: 1

    Actually it's only 1.9% if you are a merchant who does more than $100,000 a *month*.. If you are between 0 and 3 Grand a month, you pay 2.9% + $0.30 USD... If you are between 3 and 10 G's you pay 2.5% + $0.30 USD. That makes google look a lot better.

  107. In canada... by nickheart · · Score: 1

    ... in Russia, we have no banks!

  108. Subscription payments? by PCheese · · Score: 1

    One thing I haven't been able to find after a cursory look at Checkout is an option for subscriptions and recurring payments, something that Paypal does offer. I can't think of an easy way to charge users monthly, for instance, as with a magazine subscription. Sure, they can prepay for a year, but does Checkout offer something to auto-renew such subscriptions? Paypal also offers a neat 'trial period' option where there are no payments within the first xx days and the user can cancel at any time during that period.

  109. But available to U.S. residents only :( by talexb · · Score: 1

    I'm in Toronto, Ontario .. so it looks like it's going to be a while before I can take advantage of this amazing offer.

  110. Credit cards by d!al3r · · Score: 1
    W3K adds "You can use your Google account to store an unlimited number of credit cards and addresses. The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place,"


    I store all my credit cards in my wallet, thank you very much!
  111. I like Google, but not that much... by tinker_taylor · · Score: 1

    [[["You can use your Google account to store an unlimited number of credit cards and addresses. The service allows you to track all your orders and shipping in one place,"]]]

    I like Google and it's services. But I don't think I'll trust anyone/anything online with this kind of information, without guarantees from the vendor that they'll "fix anything that goes wrong" -- meaning , my identity/financial information gets stolen -- google would have to be legally bound to compensate me for that before agreeing to store any of that with Google.

    Having this kind of information online (especially in an intermediary service as is being proposed) will simply open everyone else up to abuse (this imho).

  112. PayPal "monopoly" on eBay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There was some speculation posted here on whether PayPal had a monopoly at eBay. Just to clarify, eBay recently created rules limiting forms of allowable payment for eBay transactions. Cutting through the complicated language, here are their rules:

    Explicitly Allowed:
    The PayPal, CertaPay, and ProPay online services.
    Credit Cards and EBT through the seller's merchant account
    Bank wire transfers
    COD
    Cash for in-person transactions only
    Checks, money orders, cashier's checks, etc.

    Explicitly Prohibited:
    Mailing cash
    Cash transfer services (Western Union, Moneygram)
    StormPay
    Any online service not specifically permitted above

    Google checkout won't be allowed until if and when eBay chooses to allow it.

  113. But can you use it for more than shopping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used paypal to send friends and other folks money related to offline purchases and other things... so far google checkout does not appear to have this feature, so i'd speculate that the visa/mastercard scenario is more likely than checkout killing paypal.

  114. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the key is to just not shop where they only take Paypal.

    When eBay started, it was the "worldwide garage sale" that inspried a Weird Al song. Alot of the stuff for sale was relatively rare or unique, collectibles mostly. Many times you could get a deal on something obscure too, just like you would at a real yard sale. It was fun and a really great way to further some non-mainstream interests or make some extra cash.

    But now? No way! It's full of people scalping products you could've found on a store shelf had not some asshole bought them all to mark up at their eBay store. This shift and "Buy it Now" pretty much killed eBay as an auction site. It's just not fun anymore and a heck of alot harder to sell anything at all because of the crowding.

    Anyway, on the occasion I find something I want, I just don't bid if the seller can't be bothered to take money. Out of state checking I can almost see, but a USPO money order is good anywhere. They're just lazy, frauds, or both and I won't subsidize it. The key to success as an eBay buyer is to realize that just about everything comes by again eventually.

    I don't know if I'll buy into Google's solution but I sure am glad they're sticking it to the fraudsters at Paypal.

  115. can you pay FRIENDS? by linuxlover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing we (at work) use paypal for is to pay each other. When we go out for lunch/drinks, one guy in the group picks up the tab for the whole group and he sends paypal requests to the rest of us. We just pay him with a click. So simple, no need to scramble for cash or trying to break a $20 bill (b/c every one has 20s) to pay $11.34 :-)

    Does Google Checkout has this? I can't spot this from the 'take a tour' plug

    This is a real nice feature and would really like to see it in GOOG version

    1. Re:can you pay FRIENDS? by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

      You should try out Paypal Mobile.
      We do the same thing, but now I just take out my phone, press a couple of buttons, and they have the money instantly.
      Also works at some stores...

  116. Body part black market by mixmasterscooter · · Score: 1

    Merchants are not allowed to sell body parts. https://checkout.google.com/seller/content_policie s.html

  117. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by DaveJ45 · · Score: 1

    It's curious to note that there is a overwhelming concept that PayPal has a 'stranglehold' on eBay.

    Lest we forget our history.

    At one time, eBay had their own inhouse payment system, which was NOT PayPal.

    PayPal's supposed 'stranglehold' on eBay is, in fact, a creation of eBay itself.

    PayPal was introduced as an online payment system for all sorts of e-commerce, which eventually included eBay. PayPal services created a way for people who wanted to process online transactions, including those that wanted to accept credit card payments, but could not/would not spend the money required to create their own seperate merchant accounts with a credit card processing service. It is important to note that, in the early days of e-commerce, credit card processing companies were highly resistant to allowing online merchants access to credit card processing and electronic funds transactions. You almost always had to have a 'brick and mortar' business location in order to get a merchant account. The few institutions that would allow online operations access to these sorts of services charged such ridiculous fees that the costs outweighed the potential benefits, thereby protecting their brick and mortar accounts from competion from online operations. PayPal provided a reasonably priced way for enterprising online merchants to accept credit card and bank fund transfers without having to establish an actual storefront location. Shareware & Freeware authors, Online storefronts, Various user supported websites, Subscription chatrooms, and all sorts of other enterprises discovered the benefits of PayPal in the earliest days of e-commerce long before PayPal was the 'bully' of eBay.

    Despite all it's other supposed faults, of which there are admittedly more than a few, this should/could be considered PayPal's overall major contribution to the natue of e-commerce as we know it today. If PayPal had not opened up this sort of financial transaction capability to the small online business scene, the big credit card companies/banking institutions would never have jumped on the bandwagon to let these sorts of enterprises get in on legitimate online funds processing. As a natural result of the nature of PayPal's creation, it's regulatory practices are different. Created 'offshore' because of the 'onshore' financial community's shortsighted approach, i.e., 'stonewalling', these sorts of business opportunities, PayPal's policies and practices were created in a completely different, and risky, business environment. Now that EVERYONE wants a piece of the online transactions market, it's easy to point the finger at PayPal and criticize the system that actually was the frontrunner in helping create the market that they all covet in the first place. A market that the 'onshore' institutions could have helped create in the first place, but refused to do so when they had the chance. It was much easier to let PayPal take all the risks in developing the market, and then jump in and try to grab what they can after the market is firmly established. Can anyone say "Imitate instead of Create" as a Business Model?

    Eventually, PayPal's share of transactions on eBay grew to such an overwhelming percentage that they literally humiliated eBay's own in-house payment system. eBay's solution to their dilemma was simple, they dropped their in-house payment system completely and BOUGHT Paypal outright, which now operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of eBay. If PayPal holds the key to the lion's share of transactions on eBay, it is important to note that this is the way eBay prefers things to be.

    And although there is no doubt that eBay transactions have most certainly become the bulk of their business, PayPal does continue to provide services to other endeavors, including those same independent online retailers, personal bill payment, and, if you stop to think about it, even competes against such services as Western Union Moneygrams. Dad can send Junior money (again!) while he is away

    --
    Differences between how you act when some one is watching, and how you act when no one is watching, define who you are
  118. Amazon.com?? by dimension6 · · Score: 1
    I didn't notice Amazon.com in the list of merchants. Something like this would really speed up their checkout process.

    Oh, wait....

  119. Google Won't Beat PayPal on eBay Any Time Soon by Pulsar · · Score: 1

    I have all the faith in Google to come up with a kick-butt service, but it's not going to beat PayPal on eBay any time soon - why? Because PayPal gets to make the rules on eBay. Since PayPal is owned by eBay, it's in eBay's best interests to protect PayPal's near-lock on the online eBay payment processing market, so they've come up with what they call (I love it) the eBay "Safe Payments Policy". (See, they're protecting us and keeping us safe. It's for our own good, of course.) The details of the policy are here: http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/safe-payments- policy.html

    The policy lists, explicitly, what payment methods sellers are allowed to accept. The only non-PayPal online methods permitted (other than accepting credit cards directly) are "Sellers may offer to accept payment through Certapay and Propay."

    The policy goes on to then list, explicitly, some specific methods sellers may NOT accept, and then ends with... "Not permitted on eBay.com: ... Finally, sellers may not request payment through online payment methods not specifically permitted in this policy."

    So it eBay hasn't given a payment method their blessing, eBay sellers can't accept it or offer to accept it in their listings. Those that do, per the policy, may suffer:
    " * Listing cancellation
              * Forfeit of eBay fees on cancelled listings
              * Listing cancellation
              * Limits on account privileges
              * Loss of PowerSeller status
              * Account suspension "

    eBay does that that "From time to time, as new payment services arise, eBay will evaluate them to determine whether they may present trust and safety concerns and are appropriate for the marketplace." - so they'll evaluate Google's system and any other new systems, but the criteria they state (I'm shocked they stated criteria...their decisions are usually arbitrary) present a huge hurdle, even for a company like Google - some of the criteria include if the method might cause "the potential for confusion among eBay users" - which, as a PowerSeller, I can say that PAYPAL causes "confusion among eBay users". The phrase "First Class Mail" or "This item is new" has even caused emails from "confused" eBay users.

    The best part - eBay bans new services. So if new services are banned, and services have to have a track record to be permitted...then eBay-focused payment services that would compete with PayPal will never reach the point that eBay might have to approve them. The rule states "the payment service has a substantial historical track record of providing safe and reliable financial and/or banking related services".

    You can read the rest of it at http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/safe-payments- policy.html but it makes it pretty obvious from even just these few excerpts that eBay wrote it to keep Google from competing with PayPal. I suppose because it's their sandbox, they can decide who plays in it, but this seems almost monopolistic to me. At least in the US, eBay is the default, standard, well-known auction website - Overstock, Yahoo Auctions, etc. have all tried to compete with eBay and failed; eBay has the vast majority of the traffic, and now they're using that position to limit who can startup online auction payment processing services - because if you want to have a successful, profitable online auction payment processing service in the US, it's going to -have- to work with eBay to generate any sizable levels of revenue.

    Another case of "We make the rules, so deal with it if you want to buy or sell on our site" from eBay and PayPal. I miss the days when they were much more community-oriented and community-friendly.

  120. ...but can you actually buy anything with it?! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Looking at the list of restriction on what the service can be used to pay for can you actually buy anything with it?

    https://checkout.google.com/seller/content_policie s.html I mean I can understand not allowing illegal items and such but "offensive materials" and "occult" items?! Infomercials?! "Regulated Goods", by their definition, would cover damn near every consumer product in existence (for example anything regulated by the FCC which would be pretty much all electronics).

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  121. I just bought something by __aahrlq8808 · · Score: 1

    I just signed up and bought two optical mouses from uBid using the "early adopter" $10 off coupon. Worked great. One-page form and then only one click after going to checkout. A lot simpler than the multiple PayPal pages you have to go through after an eBay purchase.

  122. Re:End of your Violin Business ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be a joke : Last update 1 October 2005

  123. Merchants are getting bent over too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a. Use standard Google Checkout buttons only
    You may only use Google-hosted button images. You may not alter the size, shape, color, or any other aspect of these images.


    That's effectively means tracking ALL people going through merchant's
    checkout page, including those NOT using Google's services. Nice and
    f*cking subtle.

  124. Cannot sell illegal goods with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Since when has a bank decided what their customers can do or cannot do with their money? Google has now their own definition of what's an illegal goods, and they may change it over time. Some examples of things you are not allowed to sell (more here)
    • Alcohol, when is the last time you ever bought booze online?
    • Body parts, does this include stem cells?
    • Child pornography, like I was going to buy that anyway.
    • Copyrighted media, so forget about selling your own music through Gpay
    • Endangered species, including lamas, gnus and mozillas, of course.
    • Government IDs or documents, this category also includes "noble titles", you can use a plain credit card for that
    • Miracle cures, I guess VIAGRA spammers will have to stick with PayPal
    • Precious metals and hazardous material, Damn, I cannot sell my recycled plutonium through Gpay!
    • Securities, I really wanted to dump my GOOG stocks with this
    • Tobacco and cigarettes, that's bad for you, might as well avoid buying it
    • Weapons, no comment
    Ah, the good old days of anonymous cash!
  125. 1 cent to charity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if one cent per each transaction went to charity?

  126. Visa/Mastercard by aevans · · Score: 1

    Visa and Mastercard are the same thing. It's like buying a Dodge or Chrysler Neon. They're all Mercedes, the only difference is the logo.

  127. Try Google. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "(I know you can sign up for MSN with another email address, but it's really hard to find that site)."

    I found it pretty easily thanks to a site called Google.

    (Alternatively, Kopete has an MSN signup process which does let you enable any MS passport id for MSN; I think Adium has similar support)

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  128. So they're secure? That's good, but not everything by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1

    The standards you posted seem to all deal with data security. While that's a very important part of banking, it's not everything you should look for in a bank.

    The problem with Paypal is that they skirt the law - they act like a bank when it suits them, but make sure that they aren't subject to normal banking regulations. For example, they can freeze your account indefinitely or withdraw your money at their whim. A real bank would have to abide by many laws and regulations when doing that, and would have to have a damn good reason - or they'd be criminally liable. Even then, if they were to do something drastic such as close your account, they would almost certainly have to cut you a check for the remaining balance. Paypal? Not in a million years! That money's THEIRS; it's by their goodwill alone that you can do anything with it.

    Paypal has quite the reputation for terrible customer service, borderline fraudulent practices, and questionable handling of money. While real banks might not be the most wonderful institutions around, at least you get legal protection. The most you can hope for with PayPal is a civil suit, and you can be sure that they have teams of attack lawyers to make sure that getting your $500 back will cost you $10,000 - if you get it at all.

    --

    That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  129. Amazon and ThinkGeek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Realisticly, I only buy a few things online. For most day to day shopping I prefer a store where I can examine goods personally before purchase. Now, Its all fine and good that many many small companys will swich to google, but without companies like Amazon or Thinkgeek signing on, I am unlikely to swich.

  130. Good riddance! by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Hey Paypal,
    I hope you die a horrible death, you and eBay. I'm laughing as we speak! Google is finally getting rid of this huge evil conglomerate called eBay and Paypal.

    Don't let the door hit you on the way out! BAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  131. No network marketing by Windrip · · Score: 1
    From content policies, unacceptable product categories:
    Multi-level marketing Businesses that recruit members and offer them rewards for recruiting others and/or selling services
    This is a popular way for people (including readers of /.) to augment their income. It's not clear why GOOG disses this business model.
  132. Re:paypal's safe as long as it has a monopoly at e by aevans · · Score: 1

    You don't really need to post your auction at ebay if google search can find what you're looking for. You just check a box (or click a tab, like froogle) to only return results of what's for sale (or only what's on an auction that expires this week), and it gives you everything on the internet that's not in a walled garden (watch for ebay hiding their listings from search engine robots.)

    Then an auction site becomes nothing more than an email plugin (or web form / or ftp front end) editor that generates a webpages with tags (like , etc.) that a search engine robot looks for and links to a payment gateway API. The only value added is the seller/buyer rating -- which could be replaced with search as well. You could search for "John Doe ripped me off" or something that could be standardized around their payment gateway user id. People could write on their blog "seller JohnDoe1234 on google checkout ripped me off" and you'd see it You could have address verification, along with a "credit score" like "buyer's score" or "sellers rating" too -- like Amazon.