Slashdot Mirror


Wozniak to Judge American Idol-Inspired Mac App Contest

cmundhe writes "Mac entrepreneur Phill Ryu today launched My Dream App, a new American Idol-inspired online competition where contestants can win the chance to have their killer app idea realized by experienced Mac developers. Over forty industry luminaries, including Apple founder Steve Wozniak, have signed on to My Dream App as guest judges to help contestants hone their ideas."

147 comments

  1. An Ipod for IP by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If I thought up a killer app, I think I would like more then an Ipod in return.

    I wonder if you can patent your idea first then submitt it for the competition.

    Fair enough that someone else wrote it, but it was still your Idea.

    1. Re:An Ipod for IP by omeg · · Score: 3, Informative

      You get more than just an iPod. Winners get a Macbook as well as royalties over the shareware that will be developed for them. That sounds like a pretty good return for just providing a good idea.

    2. Re:An Ipod for IP by NMerriam · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You get more than just an iPod. Winners get a Macbook as well as royalties over the shareware that will be developed for them. That sounds like a pretty good return for just providing a good idea.

      Indeed, ideas are cheap and plentiful. Finding people who can implement them and work out the details is the hard part. As a PR move, this is great for publicity, but I don't think there are many talented [programmers|authors|artists] sitting around just wishing they had a new idea to use their skills on. Usually talented people lament the fact that they'll never get to finish one in every hundred ideas they have in the short time they have on Earth.

      But hey, it's still a cool idea and might very well result in some novel new toys. I know I'll be tossing around concepts in my mind for the next few days!

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:An Ipod for IP by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree - programmers are two a penny, but a good idea is incredibly valuable.

      Why do you think patents are so valuable? Will the winner of the competition get the patent?

    4. Re:An Ipod for IP by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree - programmers are two a penny, but a good idea is incredibly valuable.

      If you're just talking about code-monkeys, then I'd agree they aren't particularly rare. But the guys involved in this project are developers who it seems will be expected to work out most of the actual *workings* of whatever "idea" is presented, and they have histories of coming up with useful and usable interfaces.

      Saying "I want a program that will automatically fix the tags of all my MP3 files" is not hard. It's coming up with an algorithm or system to analyze song files successfully, or an interface to efficiently present songs to the user for identification, that would be the hard part.

      Obviously if the entrants of this contest have already worked out the implementation details and interface for the idea and just need a programmer with Objective C experience to get it working, then the idea man deserves the major credit. But that's not what this contest sounds like to me.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:An Ipod for IP by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

      If you didn't patent your idea first (and I'm as anti-software patents as the next Dotter...) then what's stopping someone seeing your idea and implementing it? Once it's out there it can't really be patented anyway, as far as I know, because anyone who subsequently tries to get a broad patent to cover the idea will be beaten down with prior art. In theory. Also in theory a patent should include at the very least a working model of the implementation and we know how well that's been working out.

    6. Re:An Ipod for IP by stud9920 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nowadays,if you can afford the onshore patent lawyer who will file a patent for your brilliant idea, you can definitely afford Indians to code it for you.

    7. Re:An Ipod for IP by Tim+Browse · · Score: 0

      As a counterpoint - ideas are two a penny, but a good programmer is incredibly valuable.

      (I may have a different definition of 'good programmer' to you, so YMMV).

      I generally agree with the other poster that not having enough ideas is not usually the blocking factor. It's time and skill.

      Such discussions always remind me of this:

      "The consequence of that is I have a huge backlog of story ideas, and now the sort of panic is, 'Can I do them all in the rest of my career, given the speed at which they're arriving at the moment?'"

      -- Douglas Adams, April 2001

      By the way, as for the value of patents - aren't patents a description of an actual implementation of an idea, rather than just an idea?

    8. Re:An Ipod for IP by pavon · · Score: 1
      Why do you think patents are so valuable?
      Because they take something cheap (an idea), and turn in into something valuable (a monopoly on any implementations).

      If ideas are so difficult to develop then why has almost every major invention been developed independantly by multiple people?

      Creating a quality product has less to to with a single big idea and more to do with getting all the little details right. Which is why Blackberries are still the best handheld email device , even though many others have come along, and why the iPod was so successfull even though many other mp3 players existed before it.
    9. Re:An Ipod for IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nowadays,if you can afford the onshore patent lawyer who will file a patent for your brilliant idea

      And if you can't afford the onshore ones, I'm sure you'll find a lot offshore as well. The National Law School in Bangalore, for example.

      (In short, Bite my shiny Indian metal ass, you biatches.)

  2. So much for Appley originality by DrHyde · · Score: 0, Troll

    So let me get this straight. There's a competition which is a derivative of a copy of a shit TV show. Thinking different was never so easy.

    1. Re:So much for Appley originality by thelost · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure where the "american idol" comparison came from (well i am actually, some inflammatory print written by the guy who submitted this story) but mydreamapp.com doesn't state any such thing. Check the front page. And also claiming something about Apple originality is pointless, this has nothing to do with Apple the company. This is a competition for software that will be developed by independent software developers and judged by some pretty in the know panelists. This isn't high drama, it's high development.

      I for one am gonna take off my cynical hat, put on a "this could be cool" hat and wait and see what happens.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    2. Re:So much for Appley originality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I'm not sure where the "american idol" comparison came from (well i am actually, some inflammatory print written by the guy who submitted this story)


      Or "Mac entrepreneur Phillip Ryu"? From the Press Release...

      Ryu believes that My Dream App will mark a revolution in software development. "My Dream App will do for software users what American Idol did for aspiring singers. All it takes to win is a really great idea, and you don't even have to be a Mac user," Ryu said. "We're democratizing software."
    3. Re:So much for Appley originality by kirk__243 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you looked at the banner on the website? It's practically imitating American Idol, with a pencil, paintbrush and rule under a spotlight on an American Idol-like stage, with an watching audience and using what appears to be the American Idol font. It's such a blantant imitation that American Idol would have reason to be upset at the plaguarism.

    4. Re:So much for Appley originality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one am gonna take off my cynical hat

      We don't take kindly to your folk 'round here.

  3. heads and tails by b1ufox · · Score: 1
    A very good intiative indeed.

    Programmers as such need a platform at times to capitalise their genius ideas.

    This may be a short step in that direction but will give hope to lot of programmers(Mac only sadly :()

    One the other side of the coin,the idea may be incorporated into Apple's products.

    Definitely programmer got his idea shaping up and working but uder Apple's name.

    lets see what programmer chooses :)

    --
    -- "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" - TAE --
    1. Re:heads and tails by Xiroth · · Score: 1

      It's not for programmers - the contestents only present a concept, and the idea is that the winners will have their concepts converted into shareware applications. It's an interesting experiment, although I would guess that a fair number of people would be reluctant to put their ideas into such a public forum.

    2. Re:heads and tails by b1ufox · · Score: 1
      ---It's not for programmers ... Really? Are programmers barred or not allowed?

      IMO there are many programmers who have some concept, dont they?

      Although they may be skeptical to submit their concept in public like this, but some may not be...

      --
      -- "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" - TAE --
    3. Re:heads and tails by Xiroth · · Score: 0

      Heh, I actually meant to say it's not only for programmers, but failed. Should've remembered the preview button...

    4. Re:heads and tails by b1ufox · · Score: 1

      no problems, got your point :) and i agree.

      --
      -- "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" - TAE --
    5. Re:heads and tails by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      If you are a programmer and have a great idea, why not just implement it yourself? (Perhaps the idea is for a huge app that would take one person too long to implement...)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  4. Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by epo001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm alternating between thinking that this idea is ridiculously stupid, or alternatively, truly inspired.

    I propose an optimisation, let the winner be the one with the best elevator pitch - "It's like excel meets my-space, you arrange your friends into rows and columns ..."

    just like high-concept movie ideas where a one-sentence summary gets turned into a 90-minute film.

    1. Re:Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by dshaw858 · · Score: 4, Funny

      just like high-concept movie ideas where a one-sentence summary gets turned into a 90-minute film.

      Snakes on a Plane was longer than 90 minutes!

    2. Re:Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by saboola · · Score: 1

      "It's like excel meets my-space, you arrange your friends into rows and columns ..."
       
      If I could Excel macros to make certain "friends" perform the same task over and over, well you got yourself a customer.

    3. Re:Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      But "Snakes on a Plane" isn't a complete sentence, either.

    4. Re:Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      But "Snakes on a Plane" isn't a complete sentence, either.

      It is if you insert an apostrophe just before the second "s" :-) .

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    5. Re:Outsourcing gone mad or a good idea? by Bull+SR · · Score: 2, Informative
  5. I have to ask ... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 3, Funny

    But what would be an application that would equate to William Hung ?

    1. Re:I have to ask ... by walnutmon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot's new "Discussion System"

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    2. Re:I have to ask ... by robcraine · · Score: 1

      Windows.

    3. Re:I have to ask ... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      But what would be an application that would equate to William Hung ?

      SQL Server. Or Perl syntax (and I say that as a professional Perl programmer).

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    4. Re:I have to ask ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista

  6. American Idol-inspired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it still legal in the US to get inspired by other people's intellectual property?

  7. Uggggh by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    When can we vote this whole American Idol concept off the island?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Uggggh by exklusve · · Score: 1

      I do agree. Why does it have to be "American" something? Why can't it be "media whore" something instead?
      If Coke-a-cola plasters their label on every part of that show I think I will puke.
      Some day all reality TV and it's offshoots will finally disappear. Some day.........

      "They load the clip in omnicolor
      They pack the 9, they fire it at prime time
      Sleeping gas, every home was like Alcatraz
      And mutha fuckas lost their minds"

    2. Re:Uggggh by Geoff · · Score: 1

      Some day all reality TV and it's offshoots will finally disappear. Some day.........

      You know, I've been thinking that since, oh about the second round of Survivor. I'm rather impressed with the staying power of contrived-reality TV. I expected it to be a two-year fad, maybe three. But it's now been 6 years and shows no signs of abating.

      Geoff

      --

      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso

    3. Re:Uggggh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the concept was originally Popstars, and shortly after Pop Idol. In a typically American fashion they needed to put the word "American" in the title.

  8. Smart move by Denial93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a not-so-expensive method of asking the userbase what it wants, and getting their ideas. I'm willing to bet a number of entries (especially of those which didn't win, or didn't even make it into the round of 24) will end up as features in the next MacOS.

    I believe we will see more ventures of this kind in the future, even outside software. The ideas that "little people" never had the resources to implement are a resource that can be valuable and is easily tapped. What is funny is that the whole model started not in some corporate think tank, but in FPS mods. Final Doom is the first instance I can think of.

    1. Re:Smart move by Chaffar · · Score: 1
      -Fill out this form, tell us what you want in the next MacOS, and give your name, age, address. - Hell no I'm not filling no form I have my privacy to protect you sodding bastards rant-rant-rant-rant....
      [1 week later]
      - Hey come join our new crappy tv show where the best application ideas can be selected and win! All you need to do is fill in an application with your name, age, address, and the premise of your idea. - Where do I sign up ??!?

      Seriously, lessons on how to protect your intellectual capital should be taught in schools or something... it's amazing that people still haven't caught on to what these kind of "games" are actually for :/

    2. Re:Smart move by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      What is funny is that the whole model started not in some corporate think tank

      Corporations never EVER produce anything original. Ever.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    3. Re:Smart move by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to bet a number of entries (especially of those which didn't win, or didn't even make it into the round of 24) will end up as features in the next MacOS.
      Oh oh oh! I hope one of the entries that wins is working PEAP-GTC session resumption support in the Apple Airport wireless driver. I'm not holding my breath on that one though.
    4. Re:Smart move by hhawk · · Score: 1

      There are;

      * Killer Apps (never many of these... and over time they lose their "killing" edge spreadsheets, email, etc.)
      * Industry Specific Apps (software for your type of job)
      * General Productivity (word processing, calendar, etc.)

      It seems to me that while it's possible that such a contest will produce a new Killer App, it's not likely.. But then what were the odds that American Idol would really produce someone on the Idol level (Elvis, Johnny Cash, etc.).

      If it can make a Killer App "on demand" it would be an amazing way to design software..

      It should be able to create an Industry specific App but those have limited appeal.

      It's easy to create General Productivity Apps but all the good ones have been done and if it doesn't become a Killer, it's usually something of a dude.

      What American Idol has done is A) make someone(s) very famous and B) vets them enough that they are worthy of some fame. Thus C) giving the winners a real career as singers/entertainers.

      Does anyone have any hard data on how successful the Am Idol stars are (are they selling lots of albums or whatever they sell these days)?

      The software contest should do something similar A) get the word out on some new Apps and B) once its' down to a few of them, should put some legs on the sales effort. Also C) should make it easy to have a large "Beta" release.

      But are we talking about something like a small utility application to compress digital pictures or a major level application like Microsoft Office...

      In other words what is the gestation process? Is this a 3 month project or a 2 year project? and how long will the audience wait for "the paint to dry." At the end of Am Idol the "Idol" is ready for prime time (literally). Software that hits the shelf is likewise (modulo a few bugs) also ready to go. Will the "public" lose attention given the very long time it typically takes to build/test a major application?

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    5. Re:Smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But then what were the odds that American Idol would really produce someone on the Idol level (Elvis, Johnny Cash, etc.)."

      It was never meant to. The "Idol" in Pop/American Idol is more akin to "aidoru", or pop stars promoted more for look than talent. Pop/American Idol are meant to make the next Brittany Spears more than the next Elvis.

    6. Re:Smart move by operagost · · Score: 1

      I fear that if we were to ask the userbase what it wanted, we would get the software equivalent of "The Homer"

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Smart move by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      I believe we will see more ventures of this kind in the future, even outside software. The ideas that "little people" never had the resources to implement are a resource that can be valuable and is easily tapped.

      We already do. Chances are, if you work for a corporation, the contents of your brainpan are already enriching someone with "resources"--not to mention the power to derive wealth from your ideas.

      We have a word in English for this: exploitation. And I'm sure you're right, we'll see a lot more of it.

      What is funny is that the whole model started not in some corporate think tank, but in FPS mods. Final Doom is the first instance I can think of.

      There's a big difference, isn't there, between someone's uncapitalized idea and another's creative work (level design, skinning, coding, etc.) on a mod. Even in outcomes, there's a difference, as those who honed their skills modding games often found it a path into the industry.

    8. Re:Smart move by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 1

      This contest is SO last century. Building stand alone applications for specific OS's just isn't interesting anymore. All the interesting new applications are web-based and run in any browser. At best this contest will produce some clever little organizational application. /yawn.

      --
      Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
    9. Re:Smart move by hhawk · · Score: 1

      I would agree. I would imagine that the software contest is likely wise trying to create a popular program but not a killer app (Elvis is a Killer App, if you will...)

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
  9. Idea 1b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Might work better if you download Linux before deleting your old OS.

    1. Re:Idea 1b by Unski · · Score: 1

      That's purely a matter of opinion. I say he should keep his old OS and just write a worm to take down all of the 'boxen'* of smug Linux owners who have unnecessary services running and a sub-conscious belief in security through obscurity, despite everything they memorised in C.S.. * I am available for receiving a good kicking at your convenience.

  10. Don't be so crass by LKM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, if you're not a programmer, your idea is basically worthless. Ideas are a dime a dozen. Programmers who actually implement your idea cost money. Now, you can either participate in this contest and (if you win) not only see your idea realized, but actually get a price and royalties if the app sells.

    The choice isn't between owning a great idea which will inevitably make your rich, and giving it away for nothing, as you make it out to be. The choice is between nothing and seeing your idea realized while making money.

    Obviously, if you're a programmer who has an awesome idea, don't participate in this contest. Implement it yourself. But I don't think there's even one programmer too stupid to realize this.

    1. Re:Don't be so crass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ideas are a dime a dozen. Programmers who actually implement your idea cost money.

      Programmers are also a dime a dozen. A dime a gross in India.

    2. Re:Don't be so crass by LKM · · Score: 1

      Try finding a good Cocoa developer who will implement your idea. Good luck.

    3. Re:Don't be so crass by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bad programmers are a dime a dozen, which is why so are bad programs.

      Good programmers are worth their weight in gold, or at least 10-28 times their weight in bad programmers.

      Anyone could hire some teenage VB6 script kiddie out of school to bodge up something similar to what they were thinking for dollars an hour, max. The trick is in finding someone who'll take on your vague idea[1] and develop it into something beautiful, functional and usable that you can take credit for.

      That is neither easy nor cheap to outsource.

      Footnotes:

      [1] I'm sorry, but if long experience developing has taught me anything, it's this: If you don't know how to code, and have no experience of coding, you have no idea what you want.

      You might have the vaguest inkling of what you desire, but you won't have considered 90% of the edge cases, it'll be wrong in at least three ways and the whole requirement will need re-writing by the developer once he understands what you actually do want.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    4. Re:Don't be so crass by hey! · · Score: 1

      Look, if you're not a programmer, your idea is basically worthless. Ideas are a dime a dozen. Programmers who actually implement your idea cost money.

      You are so right.

      I know a number of highly experienced and more to the point highly creative engineers, and they pretty much agree: ideas by themselves don't have much value. In part this is because these are the kinds of people who have dozens of ideas every day.

      So many people have a naive view that they will have a Eureka moment that will change their lives and have the world beating a path to their door. The reality is that most ideas never get any funding, and most of those simply run their funding out before they are able to sustain themsleves.

      People get bent out of shape about people stealing their ideas, when there is nothing more worthless than a naked idea sitting in isolation from any context.

      Yet there are times when having an idea makes a huge difference. I've been thinking about this a lot lately because I've come to a kind of fork in my career. I'm often called on to have the right idea at the right time. Context makes the difference. It's like the difference between having access to a blacksmith and a forge every day, versus having access to a blacksmith when your horse has thrown a shoe and you're riding to tell the city about an invading army.

      What you need is something there isn't a very good English word for, but if there were it's definition would be this: A framework for generating ideas as situations change such that those ideas have immediate practical use.

      The closest word I can think of is "vision", which unfortunately is too polluted by the cult of management-speak to be useful. Often successful companies are ones that start with an idea, but end up doing something a bit different. Those are the companies which would have run their resources out if they stuck with one idea.

      The choice isn't between owning a great idea which will inevitably make your rich, and giving it away for nothing, as you make it out to be. The choice is between nothing and seeing your idea realized while making money.

      I think an idea for a piece of software is by itself completely valueless.

      An understanding of the underlying problem, with the experience and insight necessary to make the thousand and thousands of design and implementation decisions in the best way possible -- that's priceless. For example, I have an idea for creating data entry forms on mobile computers in a way that would allow many field inspection applications to be fielded rapidly and more importantly integrated with back office systems. However, any fool can have that idea. I on the other hand have a decade of experience doing exactly these kinds of systems. There are many ways my idea of this system is shaped by the experiences of real users and real geeks trying to implement and support such systems; this experience shapes some apparently irrelevant details of how I would implement this idea in ways that, to my mind, spell the difference between success and failure. If I were to pitch this idea to a VC, I'd try to show I'd done my homework; that I knew there was a market that could be characterized in size and value, that I knew the products in this space and there strengths and weaknesses, that I had some idea of how to bootstrap market acceptance of the product, that I had some idea what costs to deliver and support the product would be, that I had some knowledge of the problem domain and customer base that would enable me to priortize features in ways that would make the product attractive. etc. etc. etc.

      If you just sauntered into the session with the naked idea, the only chance you'd have is if the gold rush was on and the VC was desperate for a horse to ride to the gold fields. And you'd expect the VC to be calling the shots and possibly squeezing you out soon, because you aren't really bringing any new value to the effort. If it's not gold rush time, you're wasting his time and yours.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Don't be so crass by LKM · · Score: 1
      I think an idea for a piece of software is by itself completely valueless.

      I totally agree. Good idea? No value. Good idea + person who can implement it? Some value. Great idea + person who can implement it and actually has a clue about the subject and about programming and interface design and all that stuff + a plan to make money with the product? Lots of value.

      99% of all ideas fall into the first category. If you don't have a real plan to implement your idea, you might as well give it away in this contest, because you're not losing anything. Worst case, somebody steals your idea. Instead of having nothing at all, you now have the option of buying (or getting for free) an application based on your idea.

    6. Re:Don't be so crass by TheBogBrushZone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [1] I'm sorry, but if long experience developing has taught me anything, it's this: If you don't know how to code, and have no experience of coding, you have no idea what you want.
      I have to disagree here, if only about the way you express this. It's not that you don't know what you want it's just that you don't know how to express it in a way that a developer will understand. Customers talk in vague high-level terms and we talk in terms of testable cases and conditions. It is such a terrible terrible mistake to think you know better than them what they want because you will often be wrong - badly wrong - and have to spend a great deal of time and money fixing it (then blame them for changing their mind). This is not a new concept but a well understood principle of engineering. It is important not to try to interpret someone else's first expression of their idea into workable software. You have to discuss it with them. Find a common ground in which to communicate (this is where languages like UML come in because they can be used at all levels of development for different purposes). Tell them what is and isn't feasible and find solutions. Don't just dismiss what you have been asked to as impossible or unreasonable because you are the 'expert'. You may be the expert coder but you aren't the expert in someone else's business or in their idea.
      --
      And behold, a command prompt and he who sat upon it, his name was shutdown and -h 3:11 followed with him
    7. Re:Don't be so crass by LKM · · Score: 1

      I agree, the fault often lies with the engineers since they're the ones who should actually know better. But that doesn't change the fact that customers don't know what they want until they get something which they know they don't want :-)

      Anyway, I found that lots of short iterations which leads to early feedback helps a ton.

      Don't architect your application too strictly to what you think the customer wants. Either you misunderstood, or he'll change his mind sooner or later.

    8. Re:Don't be so crass by wrook · · Score: 1

      But...

      If you could find someone who realized that their idea was worthless without execution; and was capable of breaking down that idea into manageable sized pieces; and could delve into the details of the problem understanding the nuances; and understood which one of these pieces was more important than the others; and understood the problem domain that their idea was in; and could take feedback without flipping out...

      I'd take one of these in exachange for any 10 ace programmers that you could throw at me...

    9. Re:Don't be so crass by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's also a commentary on how many people want to be Cocoa developers.

    10. Re:Don't be so crass by LKM · · Score: 1
      Maybe that's also a commentary on how many people want to be Cocoa developers.

      Maybe it's a commentary on how stupid most people are that they don't get memory management? :-)

      Luckily, there's garbage collection in Objective-C 2.0. But you're right, most programmers nowadays seem to learn Java or C# and then not invest anthing into "harder" programming languages like Objective-C or C.

    11. Re:Don't be so crass by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1
      Don't just dismiss what you have been asked to as impossible or unreasonable because you are the 'expert'.

      I actually do this all the time -- but I tell them so.

      The point is to keep lines of communication open. Tell the customer what we can or cannot do, how hard it is to do a particular thing. Don't just send them betas, send them alpha mockups and user stories.

      As someone else put it: Users don't know what they want, but they know what they don't want when they see it. So make sure that they are disillusioned as to what's impossible, and that you're entirely sure what they do want out of what's possible, before you go and start implementing.

      It is, indeed, all about communication.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    12. Re:Don't be so crass by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree here, if only about the way you express this. It's not that you don't know what you want it's just that you don't know how to express it in a way that a developer will understand.

      I disagree. Sometimes this is the case, but any sufficiently talented developer would be able to compensate for that.

      I'm not talking about places where they leave out explanation - these are often technical details, and it's up to the developer to work out these issues. If the customer could do this he'd be a developer, and wouldn't need to hire one.

      I'm not talking about when a customer presents a problem and a sensible proposed solution, but is open to advice.

      I'm talking about the places where a customer wants something that's actually impossible, or has a very obvious edge case or failure mode that they (equally obviously) haven't bothered to think through.

      Case in point: As a previous job (writing financials software, shudder) the marketing department had agreat idea to produce referral trade - if a customer suggested our product to another company which subsequently bought it within a year, the referrer would get a case of wine and a free module for the software (worth as much as tens of thousands of pounds).

      The referrals were to be automatically generated by filling in a form on a web page. An intranet page (this is where Dev got involved) was requested to check (given a company name or trading #) if that company had been referred, and to return the details of the referrer if so.

      No thought had been given to the possibilities:

      1. What if more than one company had referred a new user? The board didn't want to give out two free modules, costing thousands of pounds each.
      2. What proof did we have that a company had actually referred a new user? (As opposed to merely claiming they had).
      3. There was to be no limit to how many referrals a customer could generate - what stopped a customer from entering the names and numbers of every one of their competitors, or a few tens/hundreds of local companies' details? The region was small and the software was expensive, so it could have easily been more cost-effective than buying a module.
      4. What stopped companies who were thinking of buying the product arranging for an existing customer to "refer" them in exchange for a kickback?
      5. There was no recording in the system of what date a customer referred another, and so no way to work out when the one-year referral window was up.

      As a programmer, these failure modes occur to you instantly. They can (generally) also be fixed with a few small changes to the rules. The entire system had been proposed, passed up the chain of command, debated at board level, modified, polished and passed all the way back down to marketing/development by non-developers before anyone (a developer) stood up and said "hang on a second...".

      Tell them what is and isn't feasible and find solutions. Don't just dismiss what you have been asked to as impossible or unreasonable because you are the 'expert'. You may be the expert coder but you aren't the expert in someone else's business or in their idea.

      Thanks for the customer-relations pep-talk, but (again) that's not what I'm actually talking about.

      I'm talking about requesting you use one bit to store a trinary value. I'm talking about fixed-length 11-digit phone number fields on a web form designed to get international business. I'm talking about the cases where the customer is simply wrong or stupid.

      Sure, you should always sugar-coat it and tackle it delicately when talking to them, but I wasn't talking to devs in this position - I was talking to the customer. The fact remains that the customer is frequently wrong, and frequently doesn't bother to think through their requirements - that was all I was ranting about.

      And if you regularly interact with non-technical people, who have no experience

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  11. Great ideas? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    But unlike everyone else, we're not searching for skilled programmers. Instead, we're simply looking for the greatest ideas

    The greatest ideas.. oh yeah! I found one! so uh, it would be a game, and it would be about bricks of different shape stacking up each other, and when you got a full line of bricks it disappears! oh wait I have another great idea incoming! It would be a lil yellow character, in a maze, eating pills and ghosts/monsters.

    Damn it's too easy for me to come up with the greatest ideas, I only hope they didn't mean the greatest *original* ideas!

    This being said, if the experience proves successful by having great thinkers connected with great developpers, maybe will we see the advent of a new type of site where people would post their ideas, get their ideas rated/favourites/commented and people in need of ideas would go there and get in touch with the people with the original idea in order to implement it. That would be great, we would live in a world where people with great ideas and no means to make them come true and people with big means but no ideas could collaborate to make the world a better place.

    I would make the website right now, if only I wasn't that lazy

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Great ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That site already exists, even more reason to be lazy! http://www.halfbakery.com/

    2. Re:Great ideas? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      if the experience proves successful by having great thinkers connected with great developpers

      Well, see, that used to be called the "economy" until the whole thing was turned into a game show by middle management.

      Had the guy that wins this contest presented the company with his idea they would have told him to fuck off. But as long as they can make the guy stand on a stage so people can laugh at him and make sport of the whole idea of being an inventor or thinker, well, that's just fine because management can stuff tall dollars (and the patent) into their pockets in exchange for a handful of wet shit.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  12. David Watanabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It should be noted that author of Acquisition and GPL violator Mr. David Watanabe is one of the judges according to Phill Ryu's blog.

    "Hi. My name is Phill and I am an 18 year old Mac user (the super cool, hip, college student kind)." - Phill Ryu

    LOL!

    1. Re:David Watanabe by phillryu · · Score: 1, Funny

      Jesus, I guess the tongue-in-cheek humor is a bit too advanced for some of you guys. :P

    2. Re:David Watanabe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      WTF is wrong with you mods?

      take a look at his user name.....making a connection?

      The man comes here, makes a profile, and then replies saying that one qoute taken off his blog was supposed to be a joke, and he gets modded offtopic? And the parent of his post gets informative?

      I would have written this logged in, but I have already modded in here, trying to fix your mistakes.

  13. I wonder... by locokamil · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... if they can write an automatic lameness filter that recognizes when a Mac is being an officious and superior bastard and initiate a shock sequence by way of response. I recommend the following performance vs. penalty scheme:
    • 1 shock every time user logs on to Apple hardware related forum to masturbate about what new hardware may or may not be revealed during Steve Job's next keynote address
    • 2 shocks for every DRM ridden iTunes song downloaded by the user because "it works out better for the artists, and because it gives me the flexibility to do whatever I want with my music." Discretionary shocks may be assigned on the basis of whether or not the song is subsequently downloaded to an iPod (max. 1 shock), and if said iPod is a "special edition" U2 iPod (max. 2 shocks)
    • 3 shocks for every "My mac 'just works'" comment. Additional shocks in the event that Mac breaks down 1 day after warranty expires (max 3 shocks); further shocks may be assigned if user has to go to friend who uses Linux to get the problem sorted out (max 4 shocks)
    • 4 shocks for every time user says that Apple is the only sensible platform for him/her because he/she is an "artist."
    • 5 shocks for every "I never get viruses" comment to a PC user. More shocks if the user is a graphic designer who uses his computer for nothing except photoshop (max 6 additional shocks). Fatal shock may be administered if user is a graphic designer talking to a sysadmin in charge of maintaining a network of PCs.
    Now where's my iPod?
    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ... if they can write an automatic lameness filter that recognizes when a Mac is being an officious and superior bastard and initiate a shock sequence by way of response. I recommend the following performance vs. penalty scheme: 1 shock every time user logs on to Apple hardware related forum to masturbate about what new hardware may or may not be revealed during Steve Job's next keynote address 2 shocks for every DRM ridden iTunes song downloaded by the user because "it works out better for the artists, and because it gives me the flexibility to do whatever I want with my music." Discretionary shocks may be assigned on the basis of whether or not the song is subsequently downloaded to an iPod (max. 1 shock), and if said iPod is a "special edition" U2 iPod (max. 2 shocks) 3 shocks for every "My mac 'just works'" comment. Additional shocks in the event that Mac breaks down 1 day after warranty expires (max 3 shocks); further shocks may be assigned if user has to go to friend who uses Linux to get the problem sorted out (max 4 shocks) 4 shocks for every time user says that Apple is the only sensible platform for him/her because he/she is an "artist." 5 shocks for every "I never get viruses" comment to a PC user. More shocks if the user is a graphic designer who uses his computer for nothing except photoshop (max 6 additional shocks). Fatal shock may be administered if user is a graphic designer talking to a sysadmin in charge of maintaining a network of PCs. Now where's my iPod?

      Bitter much? Everytime your Windows machine crashes or gets a virus repeat to yourself I hate Mac.

    2. Re:I wonder... by locokamil · · Score: 1

      Posted from a Mac. :) Repeat after me: technology is a tool, not a lifetstyle.

    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to disagree with your clever shock-apparatus (smug Mac people are annoying), but in my opinion technology can be both tool and lifestyle.

      Petrolheads, bikers, gamers, trainspotters, model builders...lots of groups incorporate "technologism" into their lifestyles. Not to the level of the Mac cults out there, but still.

    4. Re:I wonder... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While OS X isn't perfect by any means, and while most of the actual hardware sucks, the main advantage of the Mac is that it lets you get so much closer to treating it as a tool rather than a lifestyle...

    5. Re:I wonder... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I never get viruses in Mac OS X. Because there aren't any. Yet. Of course, I've been saying that for five years now.

      A couple of trojans, maybe. And of course, they required admin privs. Not much of a trojan there.

      Yes, users will always be able to rm -rf ~. It's their user space, they can do what they want with it. You can't protect people from stupid.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:I wonder... by locokamil · · Score: 1

      It's okay-- you escape being shocked because you are replying to another Mac-user.

    7. Re:I wonder... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Damn. I like licking 9V batteries :-)

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:I wonder... by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 5, Insightful
      ... a whole lot of not-funny ranting from some asshole

      How about 10 shocks for Windows/Linux users who are constantly angry at Mac users simply because Mac users can't get it in their heads that they should just give up and use PCs? I mean, come on? Don't you arrogant elitists realize that your computers are worthless and that you're assholes for even using Macs?

      You know what? I'm an "artist", a graphic designer. I use macs because, well fuck] I've used Photoshop, Quark and illustrator -- on macs -- since the early/mid 90's. I like the platform. I know the platform. The platform fucking works. I don't need to justify being an elitist asshole if your definition of being an elitist asshole is that I'm a guy who makes a living, you know, eating, paying rent, etc by using a computer you clearly disapprove of.

      Also, I'm a programmer. I've done professional embedded systems programming on Solaris ( cross compiling to embedded hardware ) and I used linux exclusively at home for several years. I've also done Win32 programming, as well. You know why I have a Mac at home now? Because they're so goddamned well designed, at the API level that they're a dream to program for. And the hardware works. Quite well, too.

      And you know what? I've not had a virus on any mac of mine since maybe 1993 or 1994.

      So I say you get 10 shocks for being a dismissive PC user who insists that everybody do things the way you do, because clearly you know better than us how to do what we do.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    9. Re:I wonder... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny
      if said iPod is a "special edition" U2 iPod (max. 2 shocks)
      You're being way too soft there, I think a dozen or so at least.

      BTW I read a great heckler story in the Guardian the other day. Bono was doing his "every time I clap my hands a child dies in Africa" speech at a gig, when someone shouted out "well stop fucking clapping then you idiot."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:I wonder... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Yes, users will always be able to rm -rf ~. It's their user space, they can do what they want with it. You can't protect people from stupid.

      Obviously you didn't see the WWDC announcement about Time Machine.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    11. Re:I wonder... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Heh, I've seen people that can't quite grasp the concept of putting items in their dock. Time Machine is going to be just too far out there for stupids.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    12. Re:I wonder... by ender-iii · · Score: 1

      I'm having a hard time deciphering what's sarcastic and what not. Maybe I am totally missing why this post has been modded insightful...

      --
      ender-iii
    13. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean...you mean...it isn't a lifestyle?

      *faints

    14. Re:I wonder... by locokamil · · Score: 1

      First of all, you make the mistake of thinking that I'm a dismissive PC user. I'm actually fairly catholic about what operating systems I use: I have a linux/windows dual boot box, as well as a Mac.

      Secondly, my post wasn't aimed at users like yourself, who clearly know why they are using the hardware they are using. But for every user like yourself, there are a couple of thousand losers who use Macs because the ads look good. Because they think owning a Mac is a lifestyle choice.

      Apologies if I caused offense. A word of advice, however: I've always believed that a sense of proportion is a good thing to cultivate. To fly off the handle because somebody disses your favorite OS on /. is the reaction you would expect from a 6 year old whose favorite action figure has come under attack; it is hardly befitting of an obviously experienced and skilled computer user and person.

    15. Re:I wonder... by argent · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between irony and sarcasm.

    16. Re:I wonder... by Mr.Ned · · Score: 1

      That was awesome, thanks for the laugh.

    17. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to the level of the Mac cults out there? Have you ever met a biker?

  14. Let me clarify by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Successful implementation of a good idea is incredibly valuable. You don't have to come up with a new idea, you just have to implement it better than others. Do you think the Ipod was the first mp3 player?

    1. Re:Let me clarify by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course the ipod wasn't the first mp3 player, but it wasn't the programming which made it a success. It's a great combination of design, functionality and brand. Perhaps the analogy of pop idol is a good one. Being a success in IT isn't just about the idea, and how well it is implemented - just as in the music industry. Unfortunately, the best bands don't always make it - but some pretty crap bands do sometimes make it! Apple have an amazing team of programmers and designers - but my point is that they can't ever have enough new ideas, which is why we see companies like SketchUp being bought up by Google etc. Imagine an idea for an application with as great an impact as the spreadsheet, for example - this is a very valuable idea to apple and they are in a good position to make it a success.

  15. Woz is a judge for this? by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2

    I didn't know you could jump the shark on a Segway!

  16. Re:And... by NMerriam · · Score: 1

    That's okay, it wasn't a proper movie.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  17. Uh oh by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a cool competition; a word of warning to entrants- no-one call your project 'Lisa'.

    I won't go down too well :|

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    1. Re:Uh oh by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny
      I won't go down too well :|
      You are so dumped.

      Signed, stunt penguin's girlfriedn

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  18. 1. Rip off other's ideas 2. ???? 3. Profit! by sallymetharry · · Score: 0

    This MIGHT be ok, IF there was no money involved for suggesting the idea. As it is, you'll get dozens of people ripping off other people's ideas that have already been suggested on other sites, and get the credit for it.

  19. Originality vs Plagiarism ? by bloggin+joe · · Score: 1

    I just hope there's some mechanism in place to prevent people from claiming ideas they took from elsewhere as their own. Please can go pretty low to try to get a buck!

  20. Dream App? Why not go all the way... by JasonBee · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about a new Finder?

    *hangs head*....

  21. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Idol is going to replace democracy soon. I can see it now, invading far off countries to make sure they standardize voting based on american idol. OMG I need to get coffee before I get stupider.

  22. Little People Patents by Dareth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The ideas that "little people" never had the resources to implement are a resource that can be valuable and is easily tapped."

    Unless they protect them with patents prior to entering them in the contest. Does the winner get a royalty? Ever wonder if the "recording contract" an American Idol wins is better than a regular "slave contract" other artist sign?

    Hopefully just submitting the idea is considering publishing it. Software patents are bad enough without someone else patenting your idea.

    Do you suppose the first caveman who sharpened a stick hired another caveman to club the second guy to sharpen a stick? Lawyer, world's second oldest profession.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  23. Here's my idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's my idea.

    1 Make an x86 based O/S that runs on generic hardware and that looks and feels just like Windows. e.g. it should have the consistent UI of Windows applications.

    2 Make it secure (perhaps use a *NIX kernel ?)

    3 To stress the point; Make it look like Windows and make sure ALL the apps have consistent UIs that work just like their Windows counterparts.

    4 Utterly clean up the market.

    5 Massive profit.

    Most people are sick of Windows and want something else. However most people are also too used to Windows and have neither the time nor the inclination to learn another O/S so OSX/*NIX are out of the question.

    It doesn't matter if you make a Linux distro that installs itself and sits there talking to the users telling them how to get stuff done. People do not want to learn a new O/S. For most computer users (i.e. not your typical /. reader) learning a computer interface isa chore that they do not want to relearn.

    1. Re:Here's my idea by echocharlie · · Score: 1

      3. To stress the point; Make it look like Windows and make sure ALL the apps have consistent UIs that work just like their Windows counterparts.

      I suspect there are many legal hurdles to this step of your plan. The MacOS interface is already fairly easy to pick up once you shed yourself of some bad Windows habits. If they made it too similar to Windows, you'd lose what makes Apple Apple.

    2. Re:Here's my idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learning a computer interface isa chore that they do not want to relearn.

      not learn a whole new OS, no. But something to nudge them gently away from their everyday workaday windows. Itunes may have turned some heads to look into the Mac's direction, especially after the purchase of an iPod. What about something that encourages them to try something new? Something shiny?

  24. Native Hypercard for OS X by Old.UNIX.Nut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a no-brainer.

  25. Don't be so arrogant by TheBogBrushZone · · Score: 1
    Look, if you're not a programmer, your idea is basically worthless.
    I think you need a trip into the real world of software development. Ideas may be a dime a dozen but good ideas aren't so easy to come by and they take work. And the sheer arrogance that only a programmer could produce a good idea for an application is ridiculous. Fools like you give we professional software developers a terrible image because you think you know what everyone wants. You don't.
    Obviously, if you're a programmer who has an awesome idea, don't participate in this contest. Implement it yourself.
    There are reasons that software houses need clients, domain experts, marketeers, analysts, designers, lawyers and consultants as well as many developers and testers - an idea that isn't researched and based on a genuine customer need will rarely sell to the general public and good software cannot implemented to any reasonable standard of quality by a lone programmer no matter how 1337 they believe themself to be. Go back to your DVD and games collection (yes I took a look at your blog) and leave the adults to talk in peace please.
    --
    And behold, a command prompt and he who sat upon it, his name was shutdown and -h 3:11 followed with him
  26. Ideas are *everything* by theadman · · Score: 1
    Look, if you're not a programmer, your idea is basically worthless. Ideas are a dime a dozen.
    That is such crap. Ideas, or more specifically good ideas, are everything. And a truly good idea is a rare creature indeed. I work as a creative in a large (Australian) advertising agency where clients pay us specifically for ideas and then pay extra for executions. People with ideas change the world. People saying not to bother because you don't know how to execute an idea do not. Finding people to make something is easier than having a truly innovative insight in the first place.
  27. Non-coders aren't the problem... by stokes · · Score: 4, Interesting
    [1] I'm sorry, but if long experience developing has taught me anything, it's this: If you don't know how to code, and have no experience of coding, you have no idea what you want.
    I disagree. I think people who know how to code can sometimes get tunnel vision; they try to think of an idea but unconsciously return to what they know about coding -- standard UI widgets, common practices, how other applications they've written worked, et cetera. I sometimes get trapped like this myself. Someone who is just a user will describe what they want and not consider that stock widget x can't do what they're describing. The problem isn't people who don't know how to code, but people who don't think things through.
    1. Re:Non-coders aren't the problem... by LKM · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't people who don't know how to code, but people who don't think things through.

      Yeah, but programmers usually tend to think things through before implementing something. It's what they've been thaught. I'm not trying to diss on customers, it's often the programmer's fault for not asking closer, but who has never experienced the dreaded "Oh, I forgot something when we wrote the specs, just a small change" feedback after you've delivered beta X and the customer suddenly figures out that he forgot to tell you about some little feature that completely changes the whole architecture of your product?

      Okay, that has never actually happened to me, but similar things on a smaller scale have.

    2. Re:Non-coders aren't the problem... by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      Pretty much like comments on slashdot works, too ;-)

      Hey... haven't I written this before?

    3. Re:Non-coders aren't the problem... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      I don't believe I said anywhere that someone who can code necessarily knows what other people want, just what they do.

      The fact remains that unless you've had experience and/or training in an intellectually rigorous field like programming, you're almost certain not to consider all the edge cases, caveats, assumptions and potential failure modes of any idea you do have... especially when you're talking about programming something.

      Since plans often have to be scrapped or changed as a result of these kinds of unconsidered aspects, I'd argue that someone who hasn't got that kind of anal-retentive attention to edge-cases is unlikely to have a plan that doesn't need either significant adjustment or complete re-engineering.

      Since pretty much everyone's ideal program wouldn't crash, get things wrong or give unexpected or unreliable results, I'd argue that their "requirements" plan as presented is not, in fact, what they'd ultimately like produced.

      Hence, they don't actually know what they want.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  28. Woz & Tommy Chang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently heard an interview of Tommy Chang on NPR. This Woz story reminds me of Tommy Chang - both cool dudes with beards, one in geek fashion, the other in hippie fashion.

  29. Actually, I'm not, you just didn't read right by LKM · · Score: 1
    I think you need a trip into the real world of software development.

    That's funny. I make a trip into the real world of software development every morning except on saturdays and sundays.

    Ideas may be a dime a dozen but good ideas aren't so easy to come by and they take work.

    ...but we're not talking about those ideas here, now are we? We're talking about a freaking contest where people send in their ideas about new apps. Here's a hint: You have an idea which you think is great? There's a 99% probability that it's not. Your idea sucks.

    And even if your idea were great, it's still worthless until you convince somebody who can actually do something with it to implement it.

    And the sheer arrogance that only a programmer could produce a good idea for an application is ridiculous.

    That's not what I said. I said the opposite: Everyone can have a good idea (and most people think they do), but only programmers can actually do something with their ideas. And since everyone thinks he has good ideas, programmers will typically not want to implement your good idea, because they have good ideas of their own.

    So unless you're either a programmer or can pay the salary of one, your idea is not going to be implemented, no matter how good you think it is.

    Fools like you give we professional software developers a terrible image because you think you know what everyone wants. You don't.

    And fools like you should learn to read before making absurd accusations. I've never claimed that only programmers have good ideas. Most programmers' ideas are just as stupid as everyone else's, but since they're programmers, their ideas are the ones that get implemented, like it or not.

    There are reasons that software houses need clients, domain experts, marketeers, analysts, designers, lawyers and consultants as well as many developers and testers

    Uhm, software houses don't need "domain experts, marketeers, analysts and consultants" to be successfull. Buy a Mac. Go to macupdate.com. Look at software shops like Delicious Monster, Ranchero Software or Panic. They were programmers who just happened to have an idea which accidentially turned out to be good, and now they're roasting around in Lotus Elises.

    Although, frankly, now that I re-read your post I'm not sure what your point actually is. What the hell are you trying to say? Programmers need somebody to supply ideas and market analysis in order for them to create software? Or what? That is so utterly absurd that it's obvious that you don't have the first clue about software development.

    Oh, and what's with the personal attacks? Don't you like video games and movies?

    1. Re:Actually, I'm not, you just didn't read right by TheBogBrushZone · · Score: 1
      Actually, I'm not, you just didn't read right
      You're right. I completely misread your original statement. I was basing my rant on your sentence 'Look, if you're not a programmer, your idea is basically worthless'. I misread that to mean you thought only programmers could produce ideas for software whereas I see now that you are suggesting non-techies would have a difficult time realising good ideas, rather than generating them in the first place. Point taken along with a slice or 6 of humble pie.
      Although, frankly, now that I re-read your post I'm not sure what your point actually is. What the hell are you trying to say? Programmers need somebody to supply ideas and market analysis in order for them to create software? Or what?
      Obviously, if you're a programmer who has an awesome idea, don't participate in this contest. Implement it yourself. But I don't think there's even one programmer too stupid to realize this.
      I'm am trying to say that long-term successful businesses use people from many disciplines to filter out bad ideas, find gaps in the market that software can fill to generate valid new ideas as well as tailor existing good ideas so that they can progress from being just technically innovative to commercially successful. A lone developer may be able to take a good idea and turn it into a success but they may not have the business skills, domain-specific knowledge or even enough time to do alone it so I don't think it so stupid that a programmer might try to use this contest to further develop a good idea they don't have the means to persue alone especially if they fail (or don't want) to get funding and expertise from other sources such as venture capitalists, banks or their own employer.
      That is so utterly absurd that it's obvious that you don't have the first clue about software development.
      I can see how you could make that assumption but I feel I should defend myself here. I am a successful software developer with 10 years of experience and I work on cutting edge VoIP technology for the largest telecomms equipment manufacturer on the planet (in revenue terms). That said I do have some kind of gravtitational force twixt foot and mouth and on many occasions put pen to paper before giving something proper consideration.
      Oh, and what's with the personal attacks? Don't you like video games and movies?
      I have no good excuse for that behaviour. I took you for someone with no experience of industry making outrageous comments and I then proceeded to commit such an act myself. I am ashamed that I succumbed to such prejudice and pettiness and I offer you a heartfelt personal apology.
      --
      And behold, a command prompt and he who sat upon it, his name was shutdown and -h 3:11 followed with him
    2. Re:Actually, I'm not, you just didn't read right by LKM · · Score: 1

      I guess I should start out with an apology myself. Instead of calmly pointing out where the misunderstanding was, I replied by flaming back. Sorry. And, fwiw, apology accepted :-)

      About successfull software companies; as far as I can tell, it goes like this: A developer has an idea. He somehow finds the time to implement this idea. 95% of the time, the story ends here. Either the idea was crap, the implementation was crap or the developer wasn't able to make his app known. However, 5% of the time, it doesn't end here. Somehow, the application becomes a moderate or even big success. What happens next depends on the developer's skills: If his business skills suck and he doesn't want to or isn't able to hire somebody to help out, the application will remain a moderate success until something better comes along and his business peters out. If his business skills suck and he is able to hire somebody who has the talent which he lacks, things usually work out well. Since he doesn't have to care about the business side, he can concentrate on programming, probably start a second app and maybe hire more people. This is probably how most software companies get started. If his business skills are good, he may be able to manage his shop alone, but this will take away time he would spend programming, which may eventually will lead to him remaining a one-man shop.

      Now, I'm not living in the USA, so venture capital is probably somewhat harder to come by here than over there. I don't know many software shops which started out by somebody having an idea, pitching it a bank or a similar entity and thus gaining money and expertise helping him set up his shop. However, I have no stats to back that up. Just my personal experience that most successfull software shops start out with a programmer's idea. And yes, those which remain successfull over a longer period of time usually have employees with a diverse skillset, not only programmers.

      Is this contest a good idea for programmers with an idea? In my opinion, if you're a programmer who has a good idea and can set aside the time to implement it, go for it. Don't give it away. It's more work for you, and chances are it won't work out, but if it does work out, it will mean great things for you.

      If you're not a programmer, enter the contest. The chances that you'll be able to realize your idea on your own are very, very small.

    3. Re:Actually, I'm not, you just didn't read right by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Everyone can have a good idea (and most people think they do), but only programmers can actually do something with their ideas. And since everyone thinks he has good ideas, programmers will typically not want to implement your good idea, because they have good ideas of their own.

      So unless you're either a programmer or can pay the salary of one, your idea is not going to be implemented, no matter how good you think it is.

      Actually, even Apple doesn't believe that line. That's why it's shipping software for widget design. Apple, correctly, realizes that a large part of the future in software for its users is small gizmos doing tiny, limited tasks that Average Joes can put together themselves. And--gasp!--later throw away as they tire of them or find a better replacement.

      There are two reasons for this. One, there's a software glut; all the big tasks are staked out by well-known apps and their myriad clones (and, increasingly, the OS itself). Two, Average Joe, in many cases, has a better idea what he wants than do you. The promise of widgets, I'm sorry to report, is to make you redundant.

      Naturally, there's still--and practically only--the niche to go after. The example you go on to cite, Delicious Monster, is so telling. A vanity app par excellence, its compact with the user is to get him or her to scan in a media collection and then basically admire its virtual existence. Heh; if that flips your cookie, great (some of us are too busy actually reading books, listening to music and watching films, y'know?). But it points up one exploitable frontier: just as there will always be a call for celebrity-branded perfumes, so will there be for ego-stroking software.

  30. How about a modern version of... by csoto · · Score: 1

    Virtual Valerie? I mean, come on, that was fun. Admit it. You know you liked it.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  31. Ideas: worthless if you can't do anything with 'em by LKM · · Score: 1
    Ideas, or more specifically good ideas, are everything. And a truly good idea is a rare creature indeed. I work as a creative in a large (Australian) advertising agency where clients pay us specifically for ideas and then pay extra for executions.

    Uhm, we're talking about software here, not ads.

    I would tend to agree that advertising is a bit different. But even so: If you were to go out on the street and ask 100 people for their advertising ideas, you'd get 99 crappy ideas and maybe one which could be developed into something. That's why people pay you money: You are probably a person who can come up with good ideas.

    Now lets go back to this contest. Imagine it was a contest for an ad. Your agency runs a contest asking people to send in ideas for an ad. How do you react to some random non-ad person on the street telling you that he's not going to tell you his idea because it's worth too much? The simple fact is that his idea is utterly worthless, and not only because it's probably crap, but because he can't do anything with it. What's he going to do, run his own ads? His idea is worthless regardless of the quality of the idea.

    People with ideas change the world.

    No, they don't. People with ideas die bitter because they never did anything with their ideas. People with ideas who are capable of doing something with their ideas and who are lucky enough to actually have a good idea and do the right thing with that idea change the world.

    Finding people to make something is easier than having a truly innovative insight in the first place.

    That is simply not true.

    I'm a programmer. I have a drawer full of ideas for apps at home. About once every two weeks some random person who heard from a friend of a friend that I sometimes do small projects calls me because they have a great idea. Everyone has great ideas. Sometimes I have the time to do a few projects (most recently a portal for car pictures which has turned into the biggest car portal in Switzerland, although success is the exception, not the rule when implementing such ideas), but most often I don't. Everyone has ideas, but only very few people are capable of doing something with these ideas, and since these people have ideas of their own (which they probably consider to be better than everyone else's ideas), they are not very likely to implement everyone else's ideas.

    Again, your idea is worthless unless you're capable of doing something with it, and chances are you're not. Most people's ideas are going to die with them.

  32. This is oddly appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...since there is a similar percentage of Americans and Macs in the world.

  33. I know Iknow!!!!1111! by kemo_by_the_kilo · · Score: 1

    How about software to help me find a date.

    seriously, they make Ipods/itunes, just add more DRM into it, make it spy on the myspace account of the person, and find me someone compatible. quick!
    all i want is:
    Someone who looks good,
    someone who wil cook/clean
    someone who will love me for me
    someone who doesnt care im a nerd who earns an okay amount of money

    well one out of 4 aint bad

    1. Re:I know Iknow!!!!1111! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      There are a million dating sites out there. Oh, but all the women are fake phising scams.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:I know Iknow!!!!1111! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Yes but... was omitting "Opposite gender" from that list accidental or deliberate?

    3. Re:I know Iknow!!!!1111! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry to be the one to tell you this, but it ain't gonna happen. "Water seeks its own level", ie if you are a nerd and want a good looking woman, you need money.

      Listen to The Professor sometime and get schooled.

  34. So... by tnk1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Woz playing Simon, or is he going to be Paula Abdul?

  35. Apple Idol by owlman17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    AI style:

    Randy Wozniak: "C'mon dawg! S'da right language selection, needs to be a bit optimized here but its ok."

    Steven Abdul: "You have great potential and your code just moves me. The UI looks fabulous! Just keep shining, win or not, you're l337!"

    Steve Cowell: "Appalling, simply appalling. Dreadful. It's a no."

  36. re: Mac using artists by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm a big Mac fan myself these days, but I still got a laugh out of the original post.

    Nonetheless, yeah - you make a great point. Windows users seem to think they've made the Mac irrelevant for graphic-artist type work because "all the apps" are available in Windows versions as well as native Mac versions these days.

    To an extent, that's true - but it's usually the underlying OS-related issues that keep artists on a Mac. EG. An OS-wide color matching system integrated into MacOS, vs. loading application-specific stuff like "Kodak Colorwatch" software or what-not for Windows apps. Or maybe they're used to the Mac's way of doing font management?

    But if your work crosses over into web design, the Mac has Windows beat hands-down in some areas. Look at something like Rapidweaver, for example. Windows simply has nothing that can crank out WYSIWYG pages with decent-looking templates included as starting points, and the ability to add on powerful plug-in modules too. Instead, it has garbage like MS FrontPage.

  37. Re:"open," eh? by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now, I know this goes against the prevailing wisdumb, but ...

    Whats wrong with this? If the person decides to enter this contest, they do so knowing that Apple will be taking their app and 'taking it and running with it'... so whats bad about this?

    I know we're supposed to be against anyone doing anything thats not open around here - fine and dandy, but I'm sure there are some people out there that would love the

    a) exposure (great resume fodder)
    b) prize
    c) coolness of having their app included in MacOS

    So whats so bad about this? It's not like Apple is saying 'hey, you give us this idea, and we'll give it to the community' then turning around and taking it and not giving back. They're doing exactly what they say they will.

    There is nothing wrong with a company wanting to make money, and make it off good ideas. To me, thats much better than making money off of bad ideas.

    But hey, I don't toe the party line that well, so I could be completly wrong here.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  38. Ryu by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

    Mac entrepreneur Phill Ryu today launched My Dream App. He then shouted "SHORYUKEN!" and shot a fireball at John Blanka.

    --
    I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    1. Re:Ryu by TechDogg · · Score: 0

      TATSU-MAKI-SENPU-KYAKU!!

      --
      Got MILF? It does a body good!
    2. Re:Ryu by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Maybe Phill Ryu can turn American Idol-inspired online competition into a youtube video and have bob saget co-host.

  39. Re:"open," eh? by Brunellus · · Score: 1

    There's nothing inherently wrong with it, but I'm inclined to believe it will play into Apple's continuing obfuscation about "openness" in its products, development practices, and so on. It's a sore point among many that Apple (until fairly recently) traded on the "openness" of its kernel, only to close it once again.

    I guess I'm allergic to the Apple hype machine's emissions, is all.

  40. apple only by dean.collins · · Score: 1

    shame it's for apple only :(

    I have at least 3 projects I've been tossing around for a few years that i think the timing is right for.

    Dean

    1. Re:apple only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For years? That's enough time to learn to program and do the damn thing yourself.

    2. Re:apple only by NutMan · · Score: 1

      Develop it as a generic *nix app, and then wrap a pretty Cocoa UI around it. Chapter 14 of the book, "Advanced Mac OS X Programming" by Dalrymple and Hillegass tells how to do it. They build a UI around sort and traceroute.

    3. Re:apple only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They build a UI around sort and traceroute.

      Sort and traceroute, wow.

      Could you imagine any two programs whose user interfaces are more bare-bones?

      For bonus points, I'd like to see them take a graphics library and build Adobe Illustrator around it. Most apps are not as dumb as wrapping a UI around sort and traceroute.

  41. My Dream App by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    My dream app is a secure, stable operating system with good performance and no radical changes every year.

    Now implement that!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:My Dream App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the OS ur looking for is called linux?

  42. Anti-DRM Suggestions by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    This is probably fairly high visibility stuff, so why not use it as a forum to push for anti-drm stuff.

    Perhaps extending Front-Row to work on a Tivo, so i could stream my purchased itunes audio and video there.

    There must be some good forward looking projects that would only be possible if apple loosened their grip.

  43. What's your point? by LKM · · Score: 1
    Actually, even Apple doesn't believe that line. That's why it's shipping software for widget design

    Yes, if youre next big idea is a digital clock for your Mac's desktop, then you can realize it without being a programmer.

    We're talking about ideas for new software applications here, not about AppleScripts that you use and then throw away. Even if you create your apps using Apple's Widget Studio (or whatever he heck it was called), you need to know how to program unless you're using one of Apple's templates. Not to mention that you're locked in Apple's Widget Sandbox, so good luck implementing your awesome ideas as widgets and AppleScripts.

    all the big tasks are staked out by well-known apps

    No, they're not, and that's the whole point. There are constantly new apps coming out of the left field. Some of them from big vendors (Apple had a few in recent years: stuff like iPhoto, iMovie, Garage Band; Exposé could have been a shareware app if somebody outside of Apple had come up with the idea), some of them from smaller ones (again, check macupdate.com for tons of examples).

    The promise of widgets, I'm sorry to report, is to make you redundant

    Hah, I'm glad I had no coffee in my mouth right now. So you're going to create account opening software using Mac OS X Widgets? You're going to destroy our workflow application with your clock widget based on Apple's templates? I'm telling you, I'm shaking in my booths.

    And again, I must end this by saying that I'm not really sure what you're trying to say. We're discussing a competition where people can send ideas for new software applications. My argument was that non-programmers should send their ideas, because they're not going to make any money with these ideas anyway.

    Your argument seems to be that first, yes they are going to make money because they can implement their ideas (no matter what they are) as widgets (because magically, you don't have to program if you want to implement your idea as a Widget). Second, nobody is going to make money with software because all the applications that ever need to exist already do exist. And third, programmers are going to make money after all because users are stupid, contradicting everything you just said. Oh, and fourth, Delicious Library is a useless piece of crap for vain people which, of course, has no real use whatsoever (I guess you never lent somebody a DVD, never got it back and forgot who the hell you gave it to, correct?)

    Am I getting that right?

  44. CambrianHouse.com? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    Isn't this already being done (at least in theory) for Web 2.0 stuff? Fergzample, at cambrianhouse.com.

    No prizes, but royalties. They're looking for community coders, too, which I think is the limiting factor.

    Still, an interesting idea. Dunno if it actually has any realworld promise, but an interesting idea.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  45. Of Course! by ender-iii · · Score: 1

    Of course this had to come down to a platform war. Well you know what, my mother fucking dad can beat up your mother fucking dad on a mother fucking plane!

    --
    ender-iii
  46. Re:"open," eh? by godawful · · Score: 2

    this also has all of jack to do with apple. they are in no way related to the contest other than it being the platform the app is developed for.

    mmm, apple jack.

    --
    Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week