I check 4 websites for the weather in my city [forecast.io, theweathernetwork.com, weather.gc.ca, accuweather.com], and they regularly will all have totally different weather. One will be 'sunny', one will be '5-10 cm of snow', one will be 'rain', and one will be 'overcast'.
It seems like they all get together, decide on the 4 most extreme possibilities, then randomly assign each one to a site.
Oracle appears to be trying this with Google, and certainly the only reason it has gone this far is that Google is of a similar size to Oracle. If google were significantly smaller, Android would have to be radically altered or everyone would have to pay out megadollars for 'Java' licenses.
By crushing the implementation of the idea. You lose your current pile of cash due to IP problems, good luck finding investors to give you a new pile for the same idea "this time, we'll do it right!".
That is, of course, unless the winner of the lawsuit doesn't do the "well, we can settle this before you go out of business if you sign over 75% of the company".
Ugh. Having to mount a fair use defense is basically "prove I'm innocent". Not really useful for anybody with say, less than 10 or 20 million/year in revenue, as you can't afford a defense.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes. Both will gone once it eradicates the human infestation.
You kid, but you are already there. Papers please.
Damn. How many of us are on here?
Maybe do a headcount.
Two.
I wasn't considering even a week in the future. These were next day forecasting.
One of them will nail it. I just don't know which one.
Really?
I check 4 websites for the weather in my city [forecast.io, theweathernetwork.com, weather.gc.ca, accuweather.com], and they regularly will all have totally different weather. One will be 'sunny', one will be '5-10 cm of snow', one will be 'rain', and one will be 'overcast'.
It seems like they all get together, decide on the 4 most extreme possibilities, then randomly assign each one to a site.
Are you kidding? Regardless of who is elected, it will be business as usual.
probably as good as half the so-called peer reviewed journals out there.
They had their day...fifteen years ago.
Yes, they could have refused all that wonderful government money. Not. It probably added 50% to the CEO's bonus over those years.
More like:
1) "That was a pedestrian you just hit"
or
2) "That might have been a pedestrian you just hit"
That is something totally different.
Oracle appears to be trying this with Google, and certainly the only reason it has gone this far is that Google is of a similar size to Oracle. If google were significantly smaller, Android would have to be radically altered or everyone would have to pay out megadollars for 'Java' licenses.
By crushing the implementation of the idea. You lose your current pile of cash due to IP problems, good luck finding investors to give you a new pile for the same idea "this time, we'll do it right!".
That is, of course, unless the winner of the lawsuit doesn't do the "well, we can settle this before you go out of business if you sign over 75% of the company".
Have you seen Americans? I think they only have 'all-you-can-eat' restaurants. And they must get full value for their money.
You are doing it to crush the idea. Getting a bunch of money as well is just a bonus.
They are totally flying it wrong!
I believe he is trying to inform you to turn your head 90 degrees and insert it in your mouth.
Ugh. Having to mount a fair use defense is basically "prove I'm innocent". Not really useful for anybody with say, less than 10 or 20 million /year in revenue, as you can't afford a defense.
Of course, it's both.
Yeah, it could suck equally well on more platforms.
Would you mind buying one of our products for each of your employees? It might make some of them think you actually give a fuck about them.
Don't forget to make sure any laid-off employee's return the device, as you'll need a steady stream of spares to replace the broken ones.
OMG, SB totally has to start selling that.
Note, there will be complaints if you label it "gorilla".
If we gather data, and nobody knows we did it, how can it be illegal!
Job done.
trick question. Windows only installs on a standard path.