No. AMD is afraid that someone at Nvidia, IBM, or elsewhere, will look through their open source code and see that they are violating one of Nvidia/IBM/whomever's patent, and sues them for not just the linux driver, that opens the door to discovery on all their other platforms as well.
Unfortunately, there is no monitoring or enforcement mechanism, so effectively it is as if there are no conditions applied.
Well, I suppose some crazy guy at AT&T will read the document, and go "hey, we should be doing this", maybe try to actually implement some of the rules in his department and then be summarily fired. It's possible, but unlikely.
Also, whatever Amazon does to try to try and super-track what I am doing on my computer. I can always tell if an Amazon page is loaded, a CPU is pegged at 100% and every other tab will feel like my computer has just been dipped in cold molasses.
the uconnect can still display the settings just fine [I guess, potentially a rogue program could try to trick the user by displaying false data on the screen], but it shouldn't be allowed to control the settings.
And that's the rub, the extra couple of dollars for separate, completely independent buttons is too much...
Even that could be abused, as changing the suspension settings could result in a change in ride height, so a malicious program could order the suspension up and down repeatedly. And if you could do it at the harmonic frequency of the vehicle...
As well, with central heating, you are heating the whole house, whereas with their current setup, they just need to heat the parts that are actually used.
No, your old employer will demand that it be removed and destroyed because it contains some of their proprietary information, and they can't be sure it has all been removed just by 'erasing' it.
Except....Uber hasn't been told to sit at the back of the bus. They've been told to sit with the other cab companies, which they are, and they said "No".
FTFS "I am troubled by the allegations that such dangerous and illicit activity went undetected at a federal research facility. It is essential that we determine exactly where the breakdown in protocol occurred and whether similar activities could be ongoing at other federal facilities"
The first sentence [and much of the summary] indicate that possibly illegal drugs were being made, but they weren't sure. The second sentence was "How did this happen and is it happening elsewhere" [ie, it definitely happened, and we must stop it from happening again].
So, you would only consider buying an Apple-branded PC if it was exactly the same as every other manufacturers boxes, but Apple charged 20-30% less than everybody else?
I'm pretty sure everyone would buy Apple PC's then.
Apple would have 100% marketshare. Until they ran out of money selling these at a loss, given that the margins for pretty much every other manufacturer are sub-10%.
..and they owned their operating system. This made it very straightforward for Apple to stop them.
IBM also was very interested in suing cloners, but they couldn't stop Bill from selling the cloners licenses to MS-DOS, once [I think it was Phoenix?] the boot-rom was reverse engineered.
Slashdot Mirror
Bug closed. Works as designed.
Great. IP will NEVER enter the public domain.
Anthony, is that you?
No, the fan you put on the CPU blows the dust away.
...designed by Italian's after consuming a large batch of wine!
It's not illegal if there is nobody who will investigate it and nobody is ever charged.
No. AMD is afraid that someone at Nvidia, IBM, or elsewhere, will look through their open source code and see that they are violating one of Nvidia/IBM/whomever's patent, and sues them for not just the linux driver, that opens the door to discovery on all their other platforms as well.
Budget? I suppose we do a round of layoffs...
No, I get a proper, fully rendered page. Why is my CPU at 100%?
Yes, they are legally binding.
Unfortunately, there is no monitoring or enforcement mechanism, so effectively it is as if there are no conditions applied.
Well, I suppose some crazy guy at AT&T will read the document, and go "hey, we should be doing this", maybe try to actually implement some of the rules in his department and then be summarily fired. It's possible, but unlikely.
Also, whatever Amazon does to try to try and super-track what I am doing on my computer. I can always tell if an Amazon page is loaded, a CPU is pegged at 100% and every other tab will feel like my computer has just been dipped in cold molasses.
the uconnect can still display the settings just fine [I guess, potentially a rogue program could try to trick the user by displaying false data on the screen], but it shouldn't be allowed to control the settings.
And that's the rub, the extra couple of dollars for separate, completely independent buttons is too much...
Even that could be abused, as changing the suspension settings could result in a change in ride height, so a malicious program could order the suspension up and down repeatedly. And if you could do it at the harmonic frequency of the vehicle...
clearly, there is no problem then, because you have seen multiple bees at your home.
As well, with central heating, you are heating the whole house, whereas with their current setup, they just need to heat the parts that are actually used.
No, your old employer will demand that it be removed and destroyed because it contains some of their proprietary information, and they can't be sure it has all been removed just by 'erasing' it.
Except....Uber hasn't been told to sit at the back of the bus. They've been told to sit with the other cab companies, which they are, and they said "No".
FTFS "I am troubled by the allegations that such dangerous and illicit activity went undetected at a federal research facility. It is essential that we determine exactly where the breakdown in protocol occurred and whether similar activities could be ongoing at other federal facilities"
The first sentence [and much of the summary] indicate that possibly illegal drugs were being made, but they weren't sure.
The second sentence was "How did this happen and is it happening elsewhere" [ie, it definitely happened, and we must stop it from happening again].
So, you would only consider buying an Apple-branded PC if it was exactly the same as every other manufacturers boxes, but Apple charged 20-30% less than everybody else?
I'm pretty sure everyone would buy Apple PC's then.
Apple would have 100% marketshare. Until they ran out of money selling these at a loss, given that the margins for pretty much every other manufacturer are sub-10%.
Sorry, for this story, it's "Eye'll be back!"
..and they owned their operating system. This made it very straightforward for Apple to stop them.
IBM also was very interested in suing cloners, but they couldn't stop Bill from selling the cloners licenses to MS-DOS, once [I think it was Phoenix?] the boot-rom was reverse engineered.
Uploading the data to your company's server so you can sell the data is entirely different from backing up the data to iCloud.
Hell, Fitbit doesn't work with HealthKit because...they demand that you pay them EXTRA to gain access to your raw data.
haha. You like getting backdoored!
Unless you work for Microsoft, you are using someone else's excrement.
Newbie. Chalk & rock!