You won't be able to. Because you aren't paying enough up front for the vehicle, the manufacturer also needs ongoing revenue for as long as the car is being driven. They will get this money by selling your driving habits and vehicle problems to whomever will give them money.
Hell, the federal gov't will happily go along with this because they want to be able to track your movements in real-time. Because you are a terrorist.
no. I expect that right before the bill is voted on, 'not' will be inserted at a few strategic spots in the bill, completely reversing the sense of the bill, so that even janitors working at the local mayor's office will get unfettered access to your email.
Yeah, but they didn't start off with doing that. They had to be forced into doing it.
They could go for following the rules and regulations, but they prefer higher profit margins instead of doing so.
I don't understand why they aren't getting massive fines and jailtime already. Across multiple countries, they are telling governments "yeah, sure, we aren't following your regulations, but we'll keep doing it while we work with you to rewrite the regulations to our liking".
by that, they mean, a person with a car, who doesn't have any interest in driving to point A or point B, drives to point A, picks up one or more people they don't know, and drives them to point B for money. But only can be paid by credit cards. And everything is arranged over the internet.
They know, but all that walking around, driving, following takes so much effort, while also being pretty boring and relatively high-risk [having to mingle with all the terrorists]. It is way easier to just sit in front of a screen and pretend to look for terrorists.
Slashdot Mirror
Uber. Trying to make Google look less evil.
I believe that effect is known as "improper shielding".
You won't be able to. Because you aren't paying enough up front for the vehicle, the manufacturer also needs ongoing revenue for as long as the car is being driven. They will get this money by selling your driving habits and vehicle problems to whomever will give them money.
Hell, the federal gov't will happily go along with this because they want to be able to track your movements in real-time. Because you are a terrorist.
Yes. Politicians have been feeding us shit for a long time, and it seems to have slowly made most people dumber and more apathetic.
If he were Muslim, he would be charged with a host of terrorist-related charges instead...
The correct term is "unconvicted criminal living in the community".
And of course the power source of the laser now becomes the primary target. I'm sure the nuclear reactor will make a lovely cloud of steam.
No, just bricking your car [in the computer sense] is just inconvenient.
Having your car be remotely driven into a brick wall, or accelerate into a crowd or through a red light, that gets interesting.
It'll be the new 'SWATting'.
And please carry on using our software for defrauding the Federal government, as they can just print more money as necessary.
no. I expect that right before the bill is voted on, 'not' will be inserted at a few strategic spots in the bill, completely reversing the sense of the bill, so that even janitors working at the local mayor's office will get unfettered access to your email.
I did find a porn DVD that had multi-angle support...didn't make it better.
And I find the up-skirt angle a curious omission...
/ ...make sure to execute it on the source control server first...
The label has to do all the hard accounting work. It takes real effort to rip off everyone they know.
And don't forget, the major labels also own a significant share of Spotify, so they get a cut of what Spotify keeps as well.
Having to change the policy of the gov't for free brings terror to the hearts of our legislators.
Of course they are all employed....by the NSA to watch us. Because we are terrorists.
Yeah, but they didn't start off with doing that. They had to be forced into doing it.
They could go for following the rules and regulations, but they prefer higher profit margins instead of doing so.
I don't understand why they aren't getting massive fines and jailtime already. Across multiple countries, they are telling governments "yeah, sure, we aren't following your regulations, but we'll keep doing it while we work with you to rewrite the regulations to our liking".
I guess next up is UberDrugs.
Will beatdowns still be free of charge?
It also makes the site more difficult/expense to keep up to date [referring to using picts/pdfs/flash for content].
...and they spell worse.
uber isn't a taxi service
it's a ride-sharing service
by that, they mean, a person with a car, who doesn't have any interest in driving to point A or point B, drives to point A, picks up one or more people they don't know, and drives them to point B for money. But only can be paid by credit cards. And everything is arranged over the internet.
See. Completely different from a taxi service.
yes. they are just the middle-men. if they don't do it, somebody else will.
so we're all good now, right?
no, because they have to compete against someone who lives in a shack with a toilet they share with the 40 shacks around them..
Really? It's better to think you have some rights, only to find out later you don't, or to be told up front you don't have those rights....
flash = video drm for PCs now.
They know, but all that walking around, driving, following takes so much effort, while also being pretty boring and relatively high-risk [having to mingle with all the terrorists]. It is way easier to just sit in front of a screen and pretend to look for terrorists.