For example, in the text I'm writing, if I want to select a range of it it takes me around five more seconds to pinpoint the location I need with a touchpad as opposed to a mouse.
Have you tried enabling the "three finger drag" operation? I found it made a great difference to the usability of a trackpad.
I still prefer a mouse when working at a desk - but since Apple introduced the large, glass trackpads I've felt no need to carry around a mouse for use 'on the road'.
The thing about Microsoft was there was only one Microsoft. Now we have Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon... and Microsoft was still there, last time I looked.
Consumers are now free to choose which of half-a-dozen evil empires to sell their soul to. Hurrah for consumer choice!
If you have a garage or private drive where you can install a charger...
Your work becomes a gas station.
If your employer provides charging points in the car park...
Just like today's phones which only last a day, you get home , you plug it in.
...and as soon as something breaks your routine, you're carrying a brick. Fortunately, its rather easier to find a power socket with space to park your phone than a power socket with space to park your car... even more fortunately, phones are available that can survive more than 12 hours between charges.
There exists a subset of people who meet the profile for EVs: they have a daily commute short enough to be within EV range but long enough to make them want a full-sized car; they have a garage or driveway where they can charge and maybe even a charging point at work; they probably have at least one other car in the family, so they're not stranded while the car is recharging, and they have an alternative for long road trips; any regular long trips they make have fast chargers en. route and at the end, and/or they're within EV range of the airport.
For people in that group - great - for others, EVs still don't have the flexibility of conventional cars, and you're looking at paying 50% over the odds for an EV and still having to keep renting a conventional car for long trips.
I only need a small car for my regular short-ish commute and shopping trips, but I sometimes have to do a 200 mile drive, sometimes at short notice and with no guarantee of a charger at the destination. So, first I'd need a small/compact EV with a 200 mile range (none around, AFAIK - you need the size to carry enough batteries) and then I'd still need to make 2 30min-1 hour stops on the way out and probable 1 on the way back.
Why so many stops? First, as stated by the earlier poster, "200 miles [asterisk] range" doesn't mean "enough for a 200 mile trip" - it means "200 miles AT THE MOST before your car turns into a brick". So you'd have to top up at least once on each 200 mile leg. Then - did I mention "no guarantee of a charger at the destination"? So you have to make sure that you're at least half full when you arrive.
The BMW i3 with range extender almost does it for me, but oh god, the price...
Your main concern would be forgetting to plug it in, just like forgetting to get gas. The car will let you know, and in the case of he Tesla tell you where you can go to charge without any special action required.
...it may well be worth giving up 3 months of income for the sake of greater profits in the future provided your cashflow can take it. If, however, you're going to be defaulting on your debts by the end of month 2 - not such a good plan. It shouldn't be Apple's decision as to whether or not you can afford to offer a loss leader. I doubt Ms Swift would be affected, but lets be magnanimous and assume that she's acting out of concern for smaller, independent music labels who don't have 3 months of operating costs stuffed in their mattresses.
Also consider that Apple is huge and high profile. If they offer free streaming for 3 months then it is going to put a noticeable dent in all music sales, not just existing streaming services, while people try it out.
Is Swift suitable for writing applications for all? If not, developers would be writing for a limited, albeit popular platform, but limited to a certain subset nonetheless.
Well, Apple just announced that they are planning to open-source Swift and will be also be releasing a Linux version of the compiler. So the language itself isn't going to be Apple-only for much longer.
However, that only solves the language problem - the big divide between platforms is the totally different APIs that developers have to learn. Frankly, that's usually a bigger learning curve than picking up a new language.
Mind you, you can say the same for most of the big languages - off the top of my head only Java (and maybe Javascript/HTML5) come with baked-in crossplatform APIs suitable for writing GUI applications.
It was in use before there was an IBM PC, along with "personal computer" and "microcomputer." History proves you wrong.
Tricky.
"Personal Computer" definitely precedes the IBM PC - the British magazine "Personal Computer World" started in 1978. It also used the abbreviation PCW. I'm sure I had a book called "The Personal Computer Book" too but it annoyingly disappeared.
Looking at a 1980 issue of "Personal Computer World" right now. The ad for the Sinclair ZX80 describes it as a "Personal Computer".
However, skimming through the pages, the dominant term is "microcomputer" or "micro" and I certainly don't see any uses of the abbreviation "PC" jumping out at me from the pages (and I don't recall using it at the time) apart from the aforementioned PCW abbreviation of the magazine's title.
Its pretty inconceivable that, since "personal computer" was in use, nobody ever abbreviated it, and I think someone's already posted an example of a computer with PC in the name. I think, though, its quite possible that the IBM PC popularised the use of PC as a stand-alone abbreviation.
(Pity, because I don't like to give any credit to the mediocre pseudo-16-bit clunker of a CP/M box that stifled innovation for decades)
Funny, because I was just thinking, what the computing industry really needs is stagnation.
All joking apart, I think it could do with a slow down. We've already got a growing gulf between the bleeding edge and the mission-critical users who need a year or two just to test and plan migration to a new OS. Start a 2-year project on a new development platform and you're two major, often incompatible, releases behind by the end of the project. You end up with a workforce bifurcated between the old legacy project people with wisdom and experience but out-of-date technical knowledge, and the bright, young, naive things up with all the latest trends but with no experience. That's how things like NoSQL, significant whitespace, binary log files and flat mystery-meat UIs happen. That's why we're awash with tech innovations that would be wonderful if only they actually worked and/or could talk to last year's tech innovations.
Innovation is one thing - but "if it works its obsolete" is unsustainable.
5-10 years of stagnation. Hurrah! Time to refine designs, sort out that crufty code you've been meaning to fix for 10 years, deal with 10-year-old feature requests and sort out interoperability, let the kids find out what happens if you edit your significant-whitespace code in a different editor with the wrong tab setting, teach them how to create a document store in Postgresql and how great that is when you come to add ownership, ACLs and such. It might also save Ubuntu from having to wrap around to Aasvogelic Aardvark.
Except that, even if you don't care for the pantomime style, Doctor Who often rips the shit out of politicians, the military and religion. Plus, there are other British shows like Utopia, Black Mirror, Life on Mars/Ashes To Ashes and Orphan Black (OK - the latter is a US/BBC co-production) that 'do' conspiracies and social comment in ways that the traditional US TV networks wouldn't touch with a bargepole (looking forward to "Humans" although I understand that's a remake of a Scandinavian show). US viewers might not have seen them because they don't have 500 episodes and (with the exception of Who) tend to finish when the material is tapped out.
The US output has got vastly better in the last 20 years, but in the past they really couldn't touch the sort of dark, anti-establishment or morally ambiguous content of British shows like Quatermas, Blake's 7, Doomwatch (X-files without the aliens), UFO, Edge of Darkness (not the film!) or the non-SF 'House of Cards' (original British version). The sets may have wobbled (only UFO had state-of-the-art effects for the time), they all had good and bad episodes, but the stories didn't pull any punches. Yes, Star Trek had a strong social justice message, but it was mostly morally squeaky-clean and moralistic, with nice happy endings.
Scotland Yard was worried that fans of shows like the X Files and Star Trek might run amok during the Millennium according to secret files.
The actual story:
'The documents show the police and security services were concerned about the export of some new religious movements concerning UFOs and aliens from the USA in the aftermath of the mass suicide by followers of the Heaven's Gate.'"
Slight difference...
Anyway, was this going to be the Star Trek Wars or the Star Wars Trek?
When was the last time you used a piece of chalk to express yourself
When was the last time this guy saw a piece of chalk in a classroom... or saw a classroom, for that matter?
Kids text.
Know what else kids do? Hang around in shopping malls looking miserable. Many will also drink alcohol if they can get hold of it, or jiggle around in darkened rooms to music that consists of some guy making misogynistic comments over a drum machine.
So perhaps we should turn all the schools into shopping malls with rave venues, and serve lots of alcopops? Kids would be much happier. Whether they'd actually learn anything is questionable, but at least they'd stay in school. Except: they wouldn't because any cool thing to do becomes uncool as soon as an educational institution tries to do it.
Seriously - school curricula do need to make better use of technology, but that entails a major shift in the curriculum and assessment, to stop training kids to do things that technology can do better, and start teaching them to use technology properly. You don't do that by throwing a lot of tablets at schools and using them to deliver powerpoint-ized versions of the old curriculum. Shading bubbles on screen is no better than filling bubbles on paper. Nor do you learn how to interact constructively with people or construct and defend an argument by "liking" a picture of someone in Japan lighting a fart (...you didn't actually like it but all your mates 'liked' it so you went along in case anybody unfriended you).
It's not only too high, it doesn't account for the other use-cases people have for Spotify. Want to listen to an album before you buy it? Spotify free.
Yup - have to admit that's the way I often use it. At one point, they had some sort of hook-up with an online store so you could buy albums. Presumably, that didn't work out.
However, there's plenty of other albums/artists that I might get the urge to listen to occasionally but don't feel the need to own for perpetuity - I'd probably pay a couple of quid a month for ad-free access to a bottomless library, but not £10, which is far more than my average monthly music spend.
Even though a lot of people use Photoshop and Microsoft Office, a lot of others (me included) will never buy again because of the lack of a truly standalone product.
I'm not sure that compares - you're talking about being forced to 'rent' a single product, or small suite of products that, previously, you would have bought. Spotify is giving you access to a vast music library - even if you only count the genres of music that you actually like it is far more than you would ever have bought. Also, new music that people actually want is continually appearing - whereas Adobe and Microsoft's problem is that their flagship products became 'feature complete' a decade or two back - everything since then is bloat, and nobody in their right mind wants to upgrade unless forced.
You can already pay £10/month for ad-free, higher bitrate and the removal of a few other hurdles/restrictions on the free version.
I think the problem is that's a bit too high a regular outgoing for light/infrequent users, or if you need more than one service. How about a 'pay as you go' option with x hours of listening for a few quid?
Also, selling advertising can't be working very well: the vast majority of the ads are for Spotify.
That's far far above the percentage for the general population.
Citation needed.
If we're relying on the "International Journal of What A Bloke in the Pub Said", 10% of drivers having experienced a minor accident (possibly non fault) in a year sounds about right.
Of course, none of these stats are any use without some indication of the mileage or type of driving involved. The only safe bet is that the mileage of a car being used to develop autonomous driving systems is anything but "average"!
ISTR from when I read it (a long time ago in a library far, far away) the Kenemy & Kurtz book on "The BASIC Programming Language" was a good read, too.
Basic was so bad, I learned assembler. And then PASCAL, and C, and many more.
(Pedant point: 'BASIC and Pascal' not 'Basic and PASCAL' - only one of them is an acronym).
Except that BASIC was an interpreted language that would fit into an 8K ROM with room to spare for a rudimentary OS, and happily run on a microcomputer with 4K of RAM and no disc drive. This was when a floppy disc drive and controller cost twice as much as the original computer. Try using a compiled language without a twin disc drive (possible, but no fun). Telling someone that they should be using Pascal on their ZX81 or Vic 20 is just plain stupid: Its like whaling on PHP without explaining how you get Tomcat, server-side Python or Haskell on Rails* running on your cheap/free shared web hosting package.
Anyhow, as soon as computers got more powerful, BASIC started to gain proper control structures, meaningful variable names, named procedures etc. and anybody with any aptitude started using them and/or other languages. The "BASIC is harmful" meme just means that BASIC made programming accessible and interesting to a far wider range of people who maybe weren't going to grow up to be master programmers.
And no, the true gem of really bad technology is bog-standard ISO Pascal - the one with no 'real time' screen/keyboard I/O, no defined way of associating a Pascal file with an actual file in any form of filing system apart from naming the file on the command line, and what was presumably a deliberate parody of the "goto" command (you can only jump to defined labels that have to be declared in advanced but which can only have numerical names...) There were, of course, decent, but nonstandard, implementations of Pascal - but I think C won because both K&R and ANSI specified a substantial library full of useful I/O and other stuff based on the Unix API.
It was the clone market that actually handed MS control of the IBM PC, neither of which parties could have foreseen.
"IBM recognizes that MS will be licensing the MS Product Offering 1.1 to third parties".
Methinks that whoever put that line in the contract had foreseen the clone market. Its very unlike the IBM of yore not to insist on exclusive control and it must have taken some effort to avoid that. If MS hadn't been able to license MS-DOS to the clone makers, they'd have had to license CP/M or clean-room their own DOS clone, which might have limited the clones' compatibility and certainly wouldn't have made money for Microsoft!
Would that be named after the mobile broadband technology, the guitarist from U2 or Samsung's flagship smartphone? Why don't they give it a meaningful name that somehow relates to its function, like, er, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Mozilla, SeaMonkey... Oh, right. Failing that, why not the old, reliable pseudo Latin/Greek names: Webia, Browsium, internet startup names (MeWeb, WebBox, WeBrowse...) or even retro Unix names ('yawb', 'enie')?
I've always been curious if there is ever going to be a clean way of running straight windows on a macbook air (ideally Windows 10).
Eh? "Bootcamp" is straight Windows. It isn't a virtualiser like VMWare or Parallels. Its just a point and drool wizard to set up a 'dual boot' system. If you want to do it manually I'm sure there are instructions out on the Interweb.
but still need the drivers..
Last time I looked, Bootcamp Assistant had an option to download the Windows drivers as a disc image.
The typical libertarian who wants complete deregulation of *everything* but complains when Comcast is their only broadband choice.
Well, this is a UK law and I don't think we have Comcast here (unless some eejit has let them buy a stake in BT or Virgin Media).
Strangely, although the amount of regulation in the UK and EU is already enough to give a US libertarian complete apoplexy, we do mostly get something resembling choice when it comes to internet and phone service providers. Not brilliant, but the more I hear about the US mess, the more I appreciate what we have...
(Apologies to the good people of Kingston-on-Hull, of course).
Because those who claim range anxiety want to have a "reason" for them thinking electric cars won't work
Nope, people who don't have range anxiety just have a use case where the range isn't an issue for them.
I'm not moaning about range because I don't want an electric car: I'm moaning about range because I would quite like an electric car, but paying 50-100% premium over a comparable ICE car (far more than you'd ever save in fuel costs) and then having to plan journeys around re-charges, or keep a second car or rent for long journeys just doesn't make sense.
Slashdot Mirror
For example, in the text I'm writing, if I want to select a range of it it takes me around five more seconds to pinpoint the location I need with a touchpad as opposed to a mouse.
Have you tried enabling the "three finger drag" operation? I found it made a great difference to the usability of a trackpad.
I still prefer a mouse when working at a desk - but since Apple introduced the large, glass trackpads I've felt no need to carry around a mouse for use 'on the road'.
A better question is is Apple the new Microsoft?
Nope.
The thing about Microsoft was there was only one Microsoft. Now we have Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon... and Microsoft was still there, last time I looked. Consumers are now free to choose which of half-a-dozen evil empires to sell their soul to. Hurrah for consumer choice!
...but at least Macs now run Unix.
Your house becomes a gas station.
If you have a garage or private drive where you can install a charger...
Your work becomes a gas station.
If your employer provides charging points in the car park...
Just like today's phones which only last a day, you get home , you plug it in.
...and as soon as something breaks your routine, you're carrying a brick. Fortunately, its rather easier to find a power socket with space to park your phone than a power socket with space to park your car... even more fortunately, phones are available that can survive more than 12 hours between charges.
There exists a subset of people who meet the profile for EVs: they have a daily commute short enough to be within EV range but long enough to make them want a full-sized car; they have a garage or driveway where they can charge and maybe even a charging point at work; they probably have at least one other car in the family, so they're not stranded while the car is recharging, and they have an alternative for long road trips; any regular long trips they make have fast chargers en. route and at the end, and/or they're within EV range of the airport.
For people in that group - great - for others, EVs still don't have the flexibility of conventional cars, and you're looking at paying 50% over the odds for an EV and still having to keep renting a conventional car for long trips.
I only need a small car for my regular short-ish commute and shopping trips, but I sometimes have to do a 200 mile drive, sometimes at short notice and with no guarantee of a charger at the destination. So, first I'd need a small/compact EV with a 200 mile range (none around, AFAIK - you need the size to carry enough batteries) and then I'd still need to make 2 30min-1 hour stops on the way out and probable 1 on the way back.
Why so many stops? First, as stated by the earlier poster, "200 miles [asterisk] range" doesn't mean "enough for a 200 mile trip" - it means "200 miles AT THE MOST before your car turns into a brick". So you'd have to top up at least once on each 200 mile leg. Then - did I mention "no guarantee of a charger at the destination"? So you have to make sure that you're at least half full when you arrive.
The BMW i3 with range extender almost does it for me, but oh god, the price... Your main concern would be forgetting to plug it in, just like forgetting to get gas. The car will let you know, and in the case of he Tesla tell you where you can go to charge without any special action required.
The ones that work best are made from real tiger testicles. If enough people buy them we'll never be bothered by tigers again...
...it may well be worth giving up 3 months of income for the sake of greater profits in the future provided your cashflow can take it. If, however, you're going to be defaulting on your debts by the end of month 2 - not such a good plan. It shouldn't be Apple's decision as to whether or not you can afford to offer a loss leader. I doubt Ms Swift would be affected, but lets be magnanimous and assume that she's acting out of concern for smaller, independent music labels who don't have 3 months of operating costs stuffed in their mattresses.
Also consider that Apple is huge and high profile. If they offer free streaming for 3 months then it is going to put a noticeable dent in all music sales, not just existing streaming services, while people try it out.
I see what you did there.
Er... unless I'm so subtle that my words sometimes go over my own head, it was just a typo.
So the robots won't have unlimited repair, but will instead age and die?
...but the Abios will all go to Silicon Heaven. It must exist, or where would all the calculators go?
Is Swift suitable for writing applications for all? If not, developers would be writing for a limited, albeit popular platform, but limited to a certain subset nonetheless.
Well, Apple just announced that they are planning to open-source Swift and will be also be releasing a Linux version of the compiler. So the language itself isn't going to be Apple-only for much longer.
However, that only solves the language problem - the big divide between platforms is the totally different APIs that developers have to learn. Frankly, that's usually a bigger learning curve than picking up a new language.
Mind you, you can say the same for most of the big languages - off the top of my head only Java (and maybe Javascript/HTML5) come with baked-in crossplatform APIs suitable for writing GUI applications.
It was in use before there was an IBM PC, along with "personal computer" and "microcomputer." History proves you wrong.
Tricky.
"Personal Computer" definitely precedes the IBM PC - the British magazine "Personal Computer World" started in 1978. It also used the abbreviation PCW. I'm sure I had a book called "The Personal Computer Book" too but it annoyingly disappeared.
Looking at a 1980 issue of "Personal Computer World" right now. The ad for the Sinclair ZX80 describes it as a "Personal Computer". However, skimming through the pages, the dominant term is "microcomputer" or "micro" and I certainly don't see any uses of the abbreviation "PC" jumping out at me from the pages (and I don't recall using it at the time) apart from the aforementioned PCW abbreviation of the magazine's title.
Its pretty inconceivable that, since "personal computer" was in use, nobody ever abbreviated it, and I think someone's already posted an example of a computer with PC in the name. I think, though, its quite possible that the IBM PC popularised the use of PC as a stand-alone abbreviation.
(Pity, because I don't like to give any credit to the mediocre pseudo-16-bit clunker of a CP/M box that stifled innovation for decades)
Funny, because I was just thinking, what the computing industry really needs is stagnation.
All joking apart, I think it could do with a slow down. We've already got a growing gulf between the bleeding edge and the mission-critical users who need a year or two just to test and plan migration to a new OS. Start a 2-year project on a new development platform and you're two major, often incompatible, releases behind by the end of the project. You end up with a workforce bifurcated between the old legacy project people with wisdom and experience but out-of-date technical knowledge, and the bright, young, naive things up with all the latest trends but with no experience. That's how things like NoSQL, significant whitespace, binary log files and flat mystery-meat UIs happen. That's why we're awash with tech innovations that would be wonderful if only they actually worked and/or could talk to last year's tech innovations.
Innovation is one thing - but "if it works its obsolete" is unsustainable.
5-10 years of stagnation. Hurrah! Time to refine designs, sort out that crufty code you've been meaning to fix for 10 years, deal with 10-year-old feature requests and sort out interoperability, let the kids find out what happens if you edit your significant-whitespace code in a different editor with the wrong tab setting, teach them how to create a document store in Postgresql and how great that is when you come to add ownership, ACLs and such. It might also save Ubuntu from having to wrap around to Aasvogelic Aardvark.
Except that, even if you don't care for the pantomime style, Doctor Who often rips the shit out of politicians, the military and religion. Plus, there are other British shows like Utopia, Black Mirror, Life on Mars/Ashes To Ashes and Orphan Black (OK - the latter is a US/BBC co-production) that 'do' conspiracies and social comment in ways that the traditional US TV networks wouldn't touch with a bargepole (looking forward to "Humans" although I understand that's a remake of a Scandinavian show). US viewers might not have seen them because they don't have 500 episodes and (with the exception of Who) tend to finish when the material is tapped out.
The US output has got vastly better in the last 20 years, but in the past they really couldn't touch the sort of dark, anti-establishment or morally ambiguous content of British shows like Quatermas, Blake's 7, Doomwatch (X-files without the aliens), UFO, Edge of Darkness (not the film!) or the non-SF 'House of Cards' (original British version). The sets may have wobbled (only UFO had state-of-the-art effects for the time), they all had good and bad episodes, but the stories didn't pull any punches. Yes, Star Trek had a strong social justice message, but it was mostly morally squeaky-clean and moralistic, with nice happy endings.
The headline:
Scotland Yard was worried that fans of shows like the X Files and Star Trek might run amok during the Millennium according to secret files.
The actual story:
'The documents show the police and security services were concerned about the export of some new religious movements concerning UFOs and aliens from the USA in the aftermath of the mass suicide by followers of the Heaven's Gate.'"
Slight difference...
Anyway, was this going to be the Star Trek Wars or the Star Wars Trek?
When was the last time you used a piece of chalk to express yourself
When was the last time this guy saw a piece of chalk in a classroom... or saw a classroom, for that matter?
Kids text.
Know what else kids do? Hang around in shopping malls looking miserable. Many will also drink alcohol if they can get hold of it, or jiggle around in darkened rooms to music that consists of some guy making misogynistic comments over a drum machine.
So perhaps we should turn all the schools into shopping malls with rave venues, and serve lots of alcopops? Kids would be much happier. Whether they'd actually learn anything is questionable, but at least they'd stay in school. Except: they wouldn't because any cool thing to do becomes uncool as soon as an educational institution tries to do it.
Seriously - school curricula do need to make better use of technology, but that entails a major shift in the curriculum and assessment, to stop training kids to do things that technology can do better, and start teaching them to use technology properly. You don't do that by throwing a lot of tablets at schools and using them to deliver powerpoint-ized versions of the old curriculum. Shading bubbles on screen is no better than filling bubbles on paper. Nor do you learn how to interact constructively with people or construct and defend an argument by "liking" a picture of someone in Japan lighting a fart (...you didn't actually like it but all your mates 'liked' it so you went along in case anybody unfriended you).
Or, for any under-20s reading:
TLDNR: OP == TW@! TXT SUX! P3N+PPR FTW! KGOML!
It's not only too high, it doesn't account for the other use-cases people have for Spotify. Want to listen to an album before you buy it? Spotify free.
Yup - have to admit that's the way I often use it. At one point, they had some sort of hook-up with an online store so you could buy albums. Presumably, that didn't work out.
However, there's plenty of other albums/artists that I might get the urge to listen to occasionally but don't feel the need to own for perpetuity - I'd probably pay a couple of quid a month for ad-free access to a bottomless library, but not £10, which is far more than my average monthly music spend.
Even though a lot of people use Photoshop and Microsoft Office, a lot of others (me included) will never buy again because of the lack of a truly standalone product.
I'm not sure that compares - you're talking about being forced to 'rent' a single product, or small suite of products that, previously, you would have bought. Spotify is giving you access to a vast music library - even if you only count the genres of music that you actually like it is far more than you would ever have bought. Also, new music that people actually want is continually appearing - whereas Adobe and Microsoft's problem is that their flagship products became 'feature complete' a decade or two back - everything since then is bloat, and nobody in their right mind wants to upgrade unless forced.
You can already pay £10/month for ad-free, higher bitrate and the removal of a few other hurdles/restrictions on the free version. I think the problem is that's a bit too high a regular outgoing for light/infrequent users, or if you need more than one service. How about a 'pay as you go' option with x hours of listening for a few quid?
Also, selling advertising can't be working very well: the vast majority of the ads are for Spotify.
That's far far above the percentage for the general population.
Citation needed.
If we're relying on the "International Journal of What A Bloke in the Pub Said", 10% of drivers having experienced a minor accident (possibly non fault) in a year sounds about right.
Ah, here we go... - 8%.
Of course, none of these stats are any use without some indication of the mileage or type of driving involved. The only safe bet is that the mileage of a car being used to develop autonomous driving systems is anything but "average"!
ISTR from when I read it (a long time ago in a library far, far away) the Kenemy & Kurtz book on "The BASIC Programming Language" was a good read, too.
Basic was so bad, I learned assembler. And then PASCAL, and C, and many more.
(Pedant point: 'BASIC and Pascal' not 'Basic and PASCAL' - only one of them is an acronym).
Except that BASIC was an interpreted language that would fit into an 8K ROM with room to spare for a rudimentary OS, and happily run on a microcomputer with 4K of RAM and no disc drive. This was when a floppy disc drive and controller cost twice as much as the original computer. Try using a compiled language without a twin disc drive (possible, but no fun). Telling someone that they should be using Pascal on their ZX81 or Vic 20 is just plain stupid: Its like whaling on PHP without explaining how you get Tomcat, server-side Python or Haskell on Rails* running on your cheap/free shared web hosting package.
Anyhow, as soon as computers got more powerful, BASIC started to gain proper control structures, meaningful variable names, named procedures etc. and anybody with any aptitude started using them and/or other languages. The "BASIC is harmful" meme just means that BASIC made programming accessible and interesting to a far wider range of people who maybe weren't going to grow up to be master programmers.
And no, the true gem of really bad technology is bog-standard ISO Pascal - the one with no 'real time' screen/keyboard I/O, no defined way of associating a Pascal file with an actual file in any form of filing system apart from naming the file on the command line, and what was presumably a deliberate parody of the "goto" command (you can only jump to defined labels that have to be declared in advanced but which can only have numerical names...) There were, of course, decent, but nonstandard, implementations of Pascal - but I think C won because both K&R and ANSI specified a substantial library full of useful I/O and other stuff based on the Unix API.
(*I really hope that I just made that up)
It was the clone market that actually handed MS control of the IBM PC, neither of which parties could have foreseen.
"IBM recognizes that MS will be licensing the MS Product Offering 1.1 to third parties".
Methinks that whoever put that line in the contract had foreseen the clone market. Its very unlike the IBM of yore not to insist on exclusive control and it must have taken some effort to avoid that. If MS hadn't been able to license MS-DOS to the clone makers, they'd have had to license CP/M or clean-room their own DOS clone, which might have limited the clones' compatibility and certainly wouldn't have made money for Microsoft!
Edge?
Would that be named after the mobile broadband technology, the guitarist from U2 or Samsung's flagship smartphone? Why don't they give it a meaningful name that somehow relates to its function, like, er, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Mozilla, SeaMonkey... Oh, right. Failing that, why not the old, reliable pseudo Latin/Greek names: Webia, Browsium, internet startup names (MeWeb, WebBox, WeBrowse...) or even retro Unix names ('yawb', 'enie')?
This is a great idea, and as we hear on BBC, there are already existing tunnels all over the world, dug by Tibetans:
Unfortunately that won't work for London: Tibetans can't dig inside the M25 or their shovels spontaneously combust.
only 3 incorrect attempts locks the account and requires a call to the outsourced IT in India
I think we can safely say that such a system will completely eliminate brute force password-guessing attacks. What's Hindi for "social engineering"?
Meanwhile, any suggestions for what to say to an IT department who, every time a phishing message comes round saying:
"Your account may have been compromised, please go to <a href="http://blackhats.phish.ru">www.youremployer.com</a> to confirm your security details."
...respond by sending round a message saying
"if you think you may be affected, please go to <a href="https://www.youremployer.com">www.youremployer.com;</a> to confirm your security details."
...because the people who fall for these know how to spot a dodgey hyperlink, right?
I've always been curious if there is ever going to be a clean way of running straight windows on a macbook air (ideally Windows 10).
Eh? "Bootcamp" is straight Windows. It isn't a virtualiser like VMWare or Parallels. Its just a point and drool wizard to set up a 'dual boot' system. If you want to do it manually I'm sure there are instructions out on the Interweb.
but still need the drivers..
Last time I looked, Bootcamp Assistant had an option to download the Windows drivers as a disc image.
The typical libertarian who wants complete deregulation of *everything* but complains when Comcast is their only broadband choice.
Well, this is a UK law and I don't think we have Comcast here (unless some eejit has let them buy a stake in BT or Virgin Media).
Strangely, although the amount of regulation in the UK and EU is already enough to give a US libertarian complete apoplexy, we do mostly get something resembling choice when it comes to internet and phone service providers. Not brilliant, but the more I hear about the US mess, the more I appreciate what we have...
(Apologies to the good people of Kingston-on-Hull, of course).
Because those who claim range anxiety want to have a "reason" for them thinking electric cars won't work
Nope, people who don't have range anxiety just have a use case where the range isn't an issue for them.
I'm not moaning about range because I don't want an electric car: I'm moaning about range because I would quite like an electric car, but paying 50-100% premium over a comparable ICE car (far more than you'd ever save in fuel costs) and then having to plan journeys around re-charges, or keep a second car or rent for long journeys just doesn't make sense.