Yes, that's wrong (if it's true). But it's like a cop opening your car trunk without a warrant. And finding a dead body. It's wrong and inadmissible as evidence. But the body was still there.
Elections aren't about selecting the first person that manages to escape a guilty verdict on a technicality. Had Hillary not used amazingly poor judgement in her handling of official communications, there would be no ammunition for Russia, Trump, or the GOP to embarrass her with and drive undecided voters to the other camp. The fact that it was Russia, with no right or jurisdiction to conduct an 'investigation' is also problematic. But from a point of view of ethics and justice rather than legality, the voters chose not to overlook the smell of a body in the trunk.
I've watched porn from time to time. And one thing that struck me was; starting around 2008 when the real estate and mortgage markets collapsed, quite a bit of porn started to be made in rented, high end houses. I mean really high end*. I'm pretty sure some were on or near the Pacific Coast Highway in or near Malibu. Like maybe Streisand's neighbors. And there's still quite a bit of speculative property on the market, which only remains out of foreclosure due to rentals and Airbnb.
*More than a few times I've thought as I watched this stuff that they really should move their naked asses so I can get a better look at the architecture or ocean view.
But this isn't Asians working over here on H-1B visas. This is the beginning of the market for space moving overseas. And the customers who are doing the investing aren't necessarily Americans. So they don't give a rat's ass about investing in OUR liberty.
America may not rise again. India is still largely a poor country. Most of the population lives in small villages with poor infrastructure as subsistence farmers. But India's advantage is the will set this group aside and get on with it's nascent space program. Meanwhile, our politicians have to kow-tow to a bunch of moron rednecks that think Noah was real and the earth is 6000 years old. Or a bunch of liberal retards that anguish over hobo tent camps while letting city infrastructures decay.
Actually, the interpreter would only have to provide caption text, keyed to the video timestamps. YouTube can synchronize these. This service would only have to be provided once. Because the captioning would be saved for subsequent requests. And it does scale worldwide quite effectively. Because the video, captioner and student could be located anywhere in the world. In fact, I predict that most of these services would be provided from India.
I think what got the plaintiffs to sue was that captioned videos were not available immediately for use, as they would be for hearing students. But my original argument is that deaf students have to make prior arrangements when attending live lectures. So this is a burden they must already deal with.
... built into a fake OBD II diagnostic port. Car thieves can pair electronic keys with a car with commands through this port. So now, when they break in and plug in their cracking tool.... poof!
they book someone for only the lectures with hearing disabled peoples
Yes. Which implies that the disabled people must make some sort of arrangement to have this service made available to them.
Same can be done for on-line videos. Those that deaf people want can be forwarded to a captioner/translator. Maybe even the same people that attend classes to provide such service as a sideline. Problem solved.
So, what happens when a disabled person (deaf, for example) attends a live lecture there? The university presumably would be on the line to provide a sign language interpreter given notice of such a requirement.
So, upon request just have the interpreter sit in front of a web cam and rebroadcast a picture in picture version of the material. This would only have to be done the first time, since that output could easily be saved and linked to the original. It's not a great burden upon the university, since presumably ADA would require interpreters be provided when needed. But in the case of a live lecture, arrangements would have to be made in advance.
Sounds like these guys probably got butt-hurt because on-line content wasn't available at their convenience. Tough. You can't just show up for a lecture unannounced and expect a translator to hustle their ass into a classroom either.
You can't deny nearly a fourth of the kids from education.
Why not? The Washington State education system is woefully underfunded. Cutting out 25% of the demand will bring the budget back into the black. Just tell the parents to home-school the little runny-nosed ankle biters.
Oh, they've been around for much longer than 15 years. That photo is actually a pretty nice layout with standing drafting tables. Picture a bare room of similar dimensions with row after row of 6 foot metal desks. And the rows are so close together that if you need to get up from your desk, 10 people have to suck in their guts and pull their chairs forward so you can squeeze by to the aisle.
Now, imagine that every fifth person is the idiot nephew of some big shot manager. Who thinks work is all about running sports pools and gabbing about last weeks Seahawks game.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, that's wrong (if it's true). But it's like a cop opening your car trunk without a warrant. And finding a dead body. It's wrong and inadmissible as evidence. But the body was still there.
Elections aren't about selecting the first person that manages to escape a guilty verdict on a technicality. Had Hillary not used amazingly poor judgement in her handling of official communications, there would be no ammunition for Russia, Trump, or the GOP to embarrass her with and drive undecided voters to the other camp. The fact that it was Russia, with no right or jurisdiction to conduct an 'investigation' is also problematic. But from a point of view of ethics and justice rather than legality, the voters chose not to overlook the smell of a body in the trunk.
I guess we should expect so much more from it.
Start lists with an index of zero.
Slashdotters will still have to rely on Tinder.
Maybe in the old days, but not so much anymore.
I've watched porn from time to time. And one thing that struck me was; starting around 2008 when the real estate and mortgage markets collapsed, quite a bit of porn started to be made in rented, high end houses. I mean really high end*. I'm pretty sure some were on or near the Pacific Coast Highway in or near Malibu. Like maybe Streisand's neighbors. And there's still quite a bit of speculative property on the market, which only remains out of foreclosure due to rentals and Airbnb.
*More than a few times I've thought as I watched this stuff that they really should move their naked asses so I can get a better look at the architecture or ocean view.
So, like hobos living in tents?
But this isn't Asians working over here on H-1B visas. This is the beginning of the market for space moving overseas. And the customers who are doing the investing aren't necessarily Americans. So they don't give a rat's ass about investing in OUR liberty.
America may not rise again. India is still largely a poor country. Most of the population lives in small villages with poor infrastructure as subsistence farmers. But India's advantage is the will set this group aside and get on with it's nascent space program. Meanwhile, our politicians have to kow-tow to a bunch of moron rednecks that think Noah was real and the earth is 6000 years old. Or a bunch of liberal retards that anguish over hobo tent camps while letting city infrastructures decay.
Well, that sucks!
This, exactly.
Actually, the interpreter would only have to provide caption text, keyed to the video timestamps. YouTube can synchronize these. This service would only have to be provided once. Because the captioning would be saved for subsequent requests. And it does scale worldwide quite effectively. Because the video, captioner and student could be located anywhere in the world. In fact, I predict that most of these services would be provided from India.
I think what got the plaintiffs to sue was that captioned videos were not available immediately for use, as they would be for hearing students. But my original argument is that deaf students have to make prior arrangements when attending live lectures. So this is a burden they must already deal with.
sue you for damages
That case will be heard just after the mugger who sues victims who arm themselves for creating a hostile work environment for him.
Think ATF would give me a permit for it?
No. Now go play with your dog one last time.
This could also mean that we're getting dumber faster than I thought.
Idiocracy: The prophecy has come to pass.
Another wave of used hardware is going to hit the market for Linux users any time now.
Yes. As long as it doesn't involve counting back more than 6000 years.
they book someone for only the lectures with hearing disabled peoples
Yes. Which implies that the disabled people must make some sort of arrangement to have this service made available to them.
Same can be done for on-line videos. Those that deaf people want can be forwarded to a captioner/translator. Maybe even the same people that attend classes to provide such service as a sideline. Problem solved.
lengthy jail sentences
Can't do that. The person responsible suffers from debilitating claustrophobia.
becoming students at UCBerk themselves
So, what happens when a disabled person (deaf, for example) attends a live lecture there? The university presumably would be on the line to provide a sign language interpreter given notice of such a requirement.
So, upon request just have the interpreter sit in front of a web cam and rebroadcast a picture in picture version of the material. This would only have to be done the first time, since that output could easily be saved and linked to the original. It's not a great burden upon the university, since presumably ADA would require interpreters be provided when needed. But in the case of a live lecture, arrangements would have to be made in advance.
Sounds like these guys probably got butt-hurt because on-line content wasn't available at their convenience. Tough. You can't just show up for a lecture unannounced and expect a translator to hustle their ass into a classroom either.
I buy all my AV gear out of the back of vans in parking lots.
You can't deny nearly a fourth of the kids from education.
Why not? The Washington State education system is woefully underfunded. Cutting out 25% of the demand will bring the budget back into the black. Just tell the parents to home-school the little runny-nosed ankle biters.
work from home, alone
Yeah. If you can enforce that alone part.
they've been around for at least 15 years now
Oh, they've been around for much longer than 15 years. That photo is actually a pretty nice layout with standing drafting tables. Picture a bare room of similar dimensions with row after row of 6 foot metal desks. And the rows are so close together that if you need to get up from your desk, 10 people have to suck in their guts and pull their chairs forward so you can squeeze by to the aisle.
Now, imagine that every fifth person is the idiot nephew of some big shot manager. Who thinks work is all about running sports pools and gabbing about last weeks Seahawks game.
The research team used different types of biomass in their experiments including pieces of wood, paper and leaves