Plus I don't need some crooks (Congress, competitors with deep pockets) looking over my shoulder and front-running any of my venture capital deals.
You think Snowden was a unique case? Not by a long shot. The only difference between him and many other people scraping up NSA data is that he released it to the public instead of handing it to some buddies in exchange for Hookers 'n Blow.
Sure, there are lots of nasty people like pedos online. And I support law enforcement in their reasonable efforts to remove them. But aside from soothing my conscience, whether some people are downloading kiddie porn or not doesn't affect me.
... the public, civilian Internet. By what logic do they think this is ny of their business? If the FBI or local law enforcement do the searching and, as a result, identify military personnel who might be in violation of the UCMJ (which may differ from civilian law), then by all means, turn his name over to NCIS. But lets not let civilian law enforcement off the hook for letting the civilian creeps slide. Our local cops have looked the other way on too many child molestation cases because, "Aw shucks. Its just some good ol' boys havin' fun."
The USPTO has experienced all three problems, and financial investors in lots of different tech companies have paid dearly.
That's the principle behind government: They play with other people's money, other people's intellectual property, other people's freedoms. So when they f*ck up, other people suffer.
They were trying to correlate educational attainment with genes.
That should have been easy. If daddy is successful, you get into the best schools.
Perhaps this demonstrates what a lot of people already suspect: If daddy spends his entire life at the office, making money, odds are he's not really the daddy. Better to correlate intelligence with the pool boy.
maybe the sun altered some DNA passed down through the ages.
Perhaps. But part of the evolutionary process is some sort of filter to select the most valuable mutations above others. I just don't see any evidence of that in modern society.
So what's good for the prime contractor (Boeing or SpaceX) is bad for the customer (NASA). That doesn't make sense.
Unless of course all the 'creativity' and 'innovation' really came from the subcontractors in the first place. And the primes (Boeing, I'm thinking of you) serve only to 'take a piece of da action' out of the funding stream.
able to do it promptly, safely, and not driving like a zombie idiot.
Then you will not give officers probable cause* to cite you for an initial offense. And so will not be subject to the installation of this blocking app.
*One aspect of texting (or performing any other questionable activity) while maintaining proper situational awareness sufficient to drive is not doing it in front of a police officer.
But either direction may have turned out to be viable. So at this decision node, the probability of life would be 1. On the other hand, given an initial equal distribution of forms, had one been non viable, the other would have out-competed it.
What we need to look for is what the probability of local maxima or dead ends is. Where some process is preferred at that point and is selected. But for which more advanced branches do not exist.
That's OK for potheads and other non-violent criminals. But for someone who may have used a firearm in the commission of a crime, just keep them in. Please. For the good of society.
Slashdot Mirror
This.
Plus I don't need some crooks (Congress, competitors with deep pockets) looking over my shoulder and front-running any of my venture capital deals.
You think Snowden was a unique case? Not by a long shot. The only difference between him and many other people scraping up NSA data is that he released it to the public instead of handing it to some buddies in exchange for Hookers 'n Blow.
Still gotta work on that drool from the corner of the mouth.
I don't see any freedoms being preserved here.
Sure, there are lots of nasty people like pedos online. And I support law enforcement in their reasonable efforts to remove them. But aside from soothing my conscience, whether some people are downloading kiddie porn or not doesn't affect me.
Probably using something like supercookies.
The USPTO has experienced all three problems, and financial investors in lots of different tech companies have paid dearly.
That's the principle behind government: They play with other people's money, other people's intellectual property, other people's freedoms. So when they f*ck up, other people suffer.
It's called sovereign immunity.
signed,
R2D2
Spock for his logic and dedication to the scientific principle. Kirk so we can nail the occasional hot alien babe.
Little catwalks with one-way mirrors in the sorting facilities. So inspectors can see who is stealing, screwing off, etc.
Japan is not. And they don't seem to have problems with commercial use
They were trying to correlate educational attainment with genes.
That should have been easy. If daddy is successful, you get into the best schools.
Perhaps this demonstrates what a lot of people already suspect: If daddy spends his entire life at the office, making money, odds are he's not really the daddy. Better to correlate intelligence with the pool boy.
maybe the sun altered some DNA passed down through the ages.
Perhaps. But part of the evolutionary process is some sort of filter to select the most valuable mutations above others. I just don't see any evidence of that in modern society.
Geraldo Rivera will do the documentary.
You missed a teaching opportunity. An iPad is a kind of tablet. A Surface is a kind of tablet. Just like Ford and Chevy are kinds of cars.
Yet another child who won't make it as an OO developer.
Was told by the HR rep that people can buy their way out of a conviction,
So, did you ask them if they'd ever been investigated by the SEC, IRS, FDA or any other agency? Or, worse yet; agreed to an out-of-court settlement?
So what's good for the prime contractor (Boeing or SpaceX) is bad for the customer (NASA). That doesn't make sense.
Unless of course all the 'creativity' and 'innovation' really came from the subcontractors in the first place. And the primes (Boeing, I'm thinking of you) serve only to 'take a piece of da action' out of the funding stream.
It's peculiar that TFA labels the Boeing design the 'safe choice'
As long as it doesn't involve batteries.
created by Satan
I thought it was the Communists who were trying to steal our precious bodily fluids/
able to do it promptly, safely, and not driving like a zombie idiot.
Then you will not give officers probable cause* to cite you for an initial offense. And so will not be subject to the installation of this blocking app.
*One aspect of texting (or performing any other questionable activity) while maintaining proper situational awareness sufficient to drive is not doing it in front of a police officer.
not able to sustain both directions
But either direction may have turned out to be viable. So at this decision node, the probability of life would be 1. On the other hand, given an initial equal distribution of forms, had one been non viable, the other would have out-competed it.
What we need to look for is what the probability of local maxima or dead ends is. Where some process is preferred at that point and is selected. But for which more advanced branches do not exist.
Yeah, right.
That's OK for potheads and other non-violent criminals. But for someone who may have used a firearm in the commission of a crime, just keep them in. Please. For the good of society.