"The IT company I work for is full of young, sporty guys."
There, a similar statement going on the most common stereotype for men - that only geeks work with computers. The GP's post likely meant that despite these women having the looks 'necessary' to just sit at home while their husband earns all the money they have chosen to go into the IT field. It's a stereotype BREAKER, not a stereotype ENFORCER.
Because at some point the red tape would become counter to conducting business.
If one of these employees is the store manager or even regional manager, why WOULDN'T he have the authorization to grant access? Would they need to call the AT&T HQ every time they need to look up a record to have access granted from within?
This is why there would be multiple ISPs AT THE DATACENTER.
Do you have ten different sets of plumbing running to your house so you can pick and choose between the best supplier of fresh water? A dozen different power cables so you can switch power company easily?
It is the belief that Darwin's Theory of Evolution (with later minor revisions and adjustments) is the explanation of how evolution works. As long as something is a theory you are open to other explanations, but you can believe that this particular theory is the right one due to overwhelming evidence that still does not prove it as hard irrefutable fact.
Sustainable but temporary. Maybe it's just because English isn't my first language but I really fail to see how you can have both; or why you would WANT both.
Which is why the car should have a series of profiles installed, perhaps fingerprint reading or voice recognition to determine which person is 'driving' the car.
So when little Bobby gets in the car and with his squeaky six year old voice says to take him to Kentucky the car just goes "I can't let you do that, Bobby." Because little Bobby has two allowed destinations: School and Home.
The question, then, becomes obvious: Is it more likely that the perp will take your gun and shoot you (there has got to be statistics for this somewhere) or that the identifying electronics will fail and render the gun inert?
Furthermore, should it be obvious to the guy being aimed at that the gun is inert? Just the threat of being shot might be enough to deter a lot of people.
And I am sure that whoever receives your 'report' will handle it with utmost dilligence. After all, in Slashdot's lifetime a whopping ONE comment has been deleted due to serious legal threats.
Slashdot Mirror
Dammit. Time to update my password to hunter3.
"The IT company I work for is full of young, sporty guys."
There, a similar statement going on the most common stereotype for men - that only geeks work with computers. The GP's post likely meant that despite these women having the looks 'necessary' to just sit at home while their husband earns all the money they have chosen to go into the IT field. It's a stereotype BREAKER, not a stereotype ENFORCER.
Because at some point the red tape would become counter to conducting business.
If one of these employees is the store manager or even regional manager, why WOULDN'T he have the authorization to grant access? Would they need to call the AT&T HQ every time they need to look up a record to have access granted from within?
Then why are paperbacks usually cheaper than hardbacks? Of the same story, I mean.
This is why there would be multiple ISPs AT THE DATACENTER.
Do you have ten different sets of plumbing running to your house so you can pick and choose between the best supplier of fresh water? A dozen different power cables so you can switch power company easily?
It is the belief that Darwin's Theory of Evolution (with later minor revisions and adjustments) is the explanation of how evolution works. As long as something is a theory you are open to other explanations, but you can believe that this particular theory is the right one due to overwhelming evidence that still does not prove it as hard irrefutable fact.
Sustainable but temporary. Maybe it's just because English isn't my first language but I really fail to see how you can have both; or why you would WANT both.
Which is why the car should have a series of profiles installed, perhaps fingerprint reading or voice recognition to determine which person is 'driving' the car.
So when little Bobby gets in the car and with his squeaky six year old voice says to take him to Kentucky the car just goes "I can't let you do that, Bobby." Because little Bobby has two allowed destinations: School and Home.
The key word is CAN. Take a look at one of the recent stories about HP cutting off another sixteen thousand jobs.
I did? Which one of them, the first or the second? And looking at my post I don't see what you mean, could you be more precise?
And generally, the number of a tool's users with a problem at any given day SHOULD be << the number of developers or support staff.
blunt honesty
I see what you did there.
no disruption of over people
Was that an intended typo or a Freudian slip?
Showing CAM rips?
That's gotta count as cruel and unusual punishment.
The question, then, becomes obvious: Is it more likely that the perp will take your gun and shoot you (there has got to be statistics for this somewhere) or that the identifying electronics will fail and render the gun inert?
Furthermore, should it be obvious to the guy being aimed at that the gun is inert? Just the threat of being shot might be enough to deter a lot of people.
Because they carry several hundred people at any given time, probably.
You don't think people spend 270 dollars on their hobby?
And yet he yanked a rib out of Adam. I smell a malpractice lawsuit in the making.
And I am sure that whoever receives your 'report' will handle it with utmost dilligence. After all, in Slashdot's lifetime a whopping ONE comment has been deleted due to serious legal threats.
So Margaret Thatcher was worse than, say, Hitler or Kim Jung-Un?
Symantec did exactly what gets private security researchers into hot water: They publicized an exploit in a program.
Ignoring the fact that the program is malware and the exploit was a means of defeating the malware, WHY is it okay for Symantec to do this?
I don't think that's a numeral, but an unknown.
I got my start doing mr-fix-it work by fixing smashed NES controllers for all my friends
I call bullshit, Nokias are fragile by comparison to those controllers.
And this is not the case with them as separate entities?
Isn't that pretty much what the article is about, that we're all getting a touch of ADHD because of our online habits?