Twitter is NOT an official communications channel to our leaders.
Consider that Trump has morphed his Twitter account as the means to (preach) to the constituency.
Reciprocity dictates that this is also where he would get feedback from that constituency.
VALUABLE feedback from the people he is serving is being ignored via this channel.
And, this valuable feedback is likely mostly lost as most would then not resort to the unblockable proper office channels.
To effectively deafen those he is supposed to be serving, he is effectively breaching his duties as a holder of an office "By the People, For the People"!
and effectively creating a DICTATORSHIP! Yet, presently, only on Twitter.
Trump is a CORPORATE business person.
It is obvious that Trump has NO clue how to be an ELECTED official to SERVE the people.
As a CEO, he has dictatorial powers. As a PUBLIC OFFICIAL, he has OBLIGATIONS to those he (is supposed to be) governing.
Get real, fellow citizens. His is ALLOWED to block anyone on Twitter.
Now that you have (mis-)spoken with your vote for him, if you want to be heard, then fucking say it thru the official office channels.
And next time, fucking vote for a truly COMPETENT candidate!
Here in the USA, our right to protest has relevant, important feedback for our leaders.
If our leaders refuse to heed protests, then they are NOT qualified to lead in the USA! Period!
To attack protests as they did in this case, is to act like other nation states that our foreign policy frowns upon!
IF our "leaders" refuse to heed the message that ever-growing protests are working to get across, then the next step is obvious!
It sure would be nice to have access to the 'other' side of this story.
I value a reputable fact-checking resource, yet it seems uncharacteristic (of snopes.com) that only very general info regarding the issue is offered.
For example:
- If a contract term expiry is nearing, why were steps not taken in a timely manner?
- What is the 'vendor' side of the issue?
- Do you own the SNOPES.COM domain?
- What is preventing you from pointing your DNS record to another host, and circumventing that vendor's theft?
I would gladly donate if I knew more about the issue.
If we are so "smart", then why wouldn't we just build big, bad AI robots that incapacitate and capture (enemies)?
We are way too stupid a race to go about killing every time we feel justified.
Does it not make more sense to focus our primary efforts to educate everyone rather than just give up, get your gun, and remove what may not be a bad (person(s))?
Of course!
Fat men have fat sperm; which means less sperm per unit area.
It's like airline seats: once upon a time, a normal sized human could fit 1 person per seat - 3 in a half row (3 seats).
Now, one fat person takes that entire half-row!
It's not rocket science. It's survival of the fattest!
Yet, in light of the proof of a little more than half the American public being idiots - as per the last election (any half-brain would not vote for Trump) - now seems a good time to pull this one off.
What ACTUALLY apparently happened is that COMMENT emails were published, NOT the info from individual voters.
Further, the replies to said requests for State's voters' info were that only info that is already public would be submitted.
Any SSN or month and day of birth are NOT to be released.
Yet, your full name, birth year, and voter party and status (not who you voted-for) are included.
Still further, most, if not all, states are awaiting a decision by a judge before releasing anything.
Simply do not tell anyone anything different than "it's better for you", then do NOT try to measure anything, and who knows what the probabilities could be!
... The best model you can make is to remember him, run that model, it's far more than words, it's smiles and confusion, and microcues and anger, and pride, etc etc.. the words to someone else do not trigger those memory. They're just words.
Not wholly true.
I often remember my Father - moments and talks.
Yet, when I hear a recording of those moments, it brings me much closer to those moments. And, much closer to the context of it.
I think I get what you might be implying, yet Dadbot seems to have a good application.
Don't get it if you don't want or need it.
Sure - tax the users for improvements. I get that. And, it makes sense.
However, how is it that only bicyclists of a certain category are taxed?
Pedestrians and other bicyclists get a free ride?!
Is this not Representation w/o taxation?!
Would it not be better to tax the whole lot at a much lower rate? The same trails/paths get the same support!
Taxing 1.2 million at $1/ea/yr (or even 12 million @ $.50/ea/yr) is far more serving than taxing 120,000 $10 or $15/yr; and it would make path usage available fairly for all.
Correct me if I am wrong, yet the autonomous car immediate 'safety system' would be using the (V2V) protocol that does not use common internet.
I believe this to be a dedicated band employing protocols similar to WiFi for more real time communication between relevant devices.
Now, for drivers to go surfing the web - that is a different application all together.
Agreed. It is obvious! Autonomous cars do NOT use the internet! So, what is the reference intended to do? Muddy the waters for those non-savvy holders-of-office that make net neutrality rules!
How about having some truly relevant FACTS for COMPETENT officials to study?
Slashdot Mirror
Why not just eat the mushrooms?
It's probably much cheaper to grow them rather than go thru a tedious synthesis.
And, isn't E.Coli bad for humans?
I am thinking this is a step toward engineering a (tool) to control humans.
This is a VERY dangerous thing!
Twitter is NOT an official communications channel to our leaders.
Consider that Trump has morphed his Twitter account as the means to (preach) to the constituency.
Reciprocity dictates that this is also where he would get feedback from that constituency.
VALUABLE feedback from the people he is serving is being ignored via this channel.
And, this valuable feedback is likely mostly lost as most would then not resort to the unblockable proper office channels.
To effectively deafen those he is supposed to be serving, he is effectively breaching his duties as a holder of an office "By the People, For the People"!
and effectively creating a DICTATORSHIP! Yet, presently, only on Twitter.
Trump is a CORPORATE business person.
It is obvious that Trump has NO clue how to be an ELECTED official to SERVE the people.
As a CEO, he has dictatorial powers. As a PUBLIC OFFICIAL, he has OBLIGATIONS to those he (is supposed to be) governing.
Get real, fellow citizens. His is ALLOWED to block anyone on Twitter.
Now that you have (mis-)spoken with your vote for him, if you want to be heard, then fucking say it thru the official office channels.
And next time, fucking vote for a truly COMPETENT candidate!
Applying is easy.
Qualifying - not so much. Can you prove yourself?
Of course not. It will de-intrusify their own ads thus allowing then through!
This is NOT new news. So, this old news attention on SlashDot must have another agenda.
I'm pretty sure those incompetent managers had something to do with that open fly!
...and most voted for Trump; thinking he was a token!
I can't believe people EVER played Pokemon anything!
Join that editorial board and get some money for your troubles.
Oh, an while there, please save the rest of us from unqualified postings!
1) Change your email address;
2) Sign up for all kind of crap, including offensive porn, using your old email address.
Hate to break it to you, yet here is just one of many articles to contradict you:
https://heatst.com/politics/ir...
Here in the USA, our right to protest has relevant, important feedback for our leaders.
If our leaders refuse to heed protests, then they are NOT qualified to lead in the USA! Period!
To attack protests as they did in this case, is to act like other nation states that our foreign policy frowns upon!
IF our "leaders" refuse to heed the message that ever-growing protests are working to get across, then the next step is obvious!
It sure would be nice to have access to the 'other' side of this story.
I value a reputable fact-checking resource, yet it seems uncharacteristic (of snopes.com) that only very general info regarding the issue is offered.
For example:
- If a contract term expiry is nearing, why were steps not taken in a timely manner?
- What is the 'vendor' side of the issue?
- Do you own the SNOPES.COM domain?
- What is preventing you from pointing your DNS record to another host, and circumventing that vendor's theft?
I would gladly donate if I knew more about the issue.
If we are so "smart", then why wouldn't we just build big, bad AI robots that incapacitate and capture (enemies)?
We are way too stupid a race to go about killing every time we feel justified.
Does it not make more sense to focus our primary efforts to educate everyone rather than just give up, get your gun, and remove what may not be a bad (person(s))?
I got that notification!
Of course!
Fat men have fat sperm; which means less sperm per unit area.
It's like airline seats: once upon a time, a normal sized human could fit 1 person per seat - 3 in a half row (3 seats).
Now, one fat person takes that entire half-row!
It's not rocket science. It's survival of the fattest!
This is not a new tactic by retailers.
Yet, in light of the proof of a little more than half the American public being idiots - as per the last election (any half-brain would not vote for Trump) - now seems a good time to pull this one off.
What ACTUALLY apparently happened is that COMMENT emails were published, NOT the info from individual voters.
Further, the replies to said requests for State's voters' info were that only info that is already public would be submitted.
Any SSN or month and day of birth are NOT to be released.
Yet, your full name, birth year, and voter party and status (not who you voted-for) are included.
Still further, most, if not all, states are awaiting a decision by a judge before releasing anything.
This is NOT the USA where I agreed to be a citizen!!!
The ONLY purpose this serves is to corporations and covert billionaire/millionaire operations!
There is NO need for this info to be freely public.
And the fucking stupid politicians in office wonder why there are terrorist organizations, and revolutionary revolts!
What makes this an okay thing, yet Trump is getting away with hiding his private info?!
As long as the law of the land is truly righteous!
However, in light of the prevalence of corrupt governments - including in the USA - I am much more pro-people's rights.
Until we the people can set in stone what constitutes a true crime, then I reserve ALL the rights to personal privacy.
Blame this rift on corrupt law enforcement and political entities, as well as totally untrust-able corporate entities (that deserve NO rights).
As long as I am not hurting anyone, then I reserve ALL of my rights - especially privacy. I suggest you do nothing to cause me to seek harm on you!!!
Simply do not tell anyone anything different than "it's better for you", then do NOT try to measure anything, and who knows what the probabilities could be!
... The best model you can make is to remember him, run that model, it's far more than words, it's smiles and confusion, and microcues and anger, and pride, etc etc.. the words to someone else do not trigger those memory. They're just words.
Not wholly true.
I often remember my Father - moments and talks.
Yet, when I hear a recording of those moments, it brings me much closer to those moments. And, much closer to the context of it.
I think I get what you might be implying, yet Dadbot seems to have a good application.
Don't get it if you don't want or need it.
Sure - tax the users for improvements. I get that. And, it makes sense.
/yr; and it would make path usage available fairly for all.
However, how is it that only bicyclists of a certain category are taxed?
Pedestrians and other bicyclists get a free ride?!
Is this not Representation w/o taxation?!
Would it not be better to tax the whole lot at a much lower rate? The same trails/paths get the same support!
Taxing 1.2 million at $1/ea/yr (or even 12 million @ $.50/ea/yr) is far more serving than taxing 120,000 $10 or $15
Am I missing something here?
Correct me if I am wrong, yet the autonomous car immediate 'safety system' would be using the (V2V) protocol that does not use common internet.
I believe this to be a dedicated band employing protocols similar to WiFi for more real time communication between relevant devices.
Now, for drivers to go surfing the web - that is a different application all together.
Agreed. It is obvious! Autonomous cars do NOT use the internet! So, what is the reference intended to do? Muddy the waters for those non-savvy holders-of-office that make net neutrality rules!
How about having some truly relevant FACTS for COMPETENT officials to study?