Third block should have said: "So all of the billions of successful, well designed websites that [include header.html]HTML Body goes here[include footer.html] are stupid and insecure, just because you say so?"
Because Microsoft is trying to push MVC for web development doesn't mean it isn't a good paradigm to adhere to. Your data source should be just that... a source that provides data. Your UI widgets should be just that... blissfully unaware GUI objects. Then you have the "control" mechanism which takes data from the data source and loads the widgets, takes the changes from the widgets and passes them back to the data source.
Also, how in friggin gods name is a server side include a "security risk"? So all of the billions of successful, well designed websites that are stupid and insecure, just because you say so?
I suppose next you ask me what the hell DOM is and what it is good for...
It DOES break the fundamental user model of a web page. Even now. If your content is related as such that one page can't work without another page loaded, then they should all belong to the same page (even if that means using server side includes). If they aren't so twisted up that the pages can work independently, then throwing frames around can cause such headaches as function/class name collisions... that is unless your pages are "aware" of one another. Then you are killing the MVC model.
Easy for you to say. Regardless the "protection" I have in place via the Family and Medical Leave Act, my boss will make sure I am unemployed if I don't work like a rented mule.
Do NOT give me the "Then get another job" speech. I don't have the income to support the family I have without a job more than a month. I refuse to gamble with the well being of my family. Right or wrong, that is the situation, and I am not even close to the only person in this position.
Well, I could be oversimplifying it, but lets take the following scenario... I sit down at my home in the US, run some scripts, hack a Chinese government computer, brag to my friends, etc... Someone from China's government calls someone here in the US, they track my ass, throw me in a detainment cell for an indefinite period of time for being a "terrorist".
Now, I sit down in my home in China, run some scripts, hack a US government computer, brag to my friends, etc.... Someone from the US government calls... wait a minute, no they didn't. No one even cared. But lets pretend they did care and they called some official in China and told them what was going on... *LAUGHTER AND LOTS OF POINTING* from the Chinese side.
Thing is, once you are compromised, you shouldn't trust that machine again. You detected and removed something, so you know you were vulnerable. How many are there you DIDN'T detect?
'Whether you agree with Sun policing it or not, Java compatibility has served us all very well for over a decade,' Phipps wrote. 'That includes being sure as a developer that all core classes are present on all platforms. Creating subsets of the core classes in the Java platform was forbidden for a really good reason, and it's wanton and irresponsible to casually flaunt the rules.'
So next time I pick up a hooker, it'll be OK if I beat her on top of screwing her, as long as I give her an extra $40 or so?
Yes, it is OK, so long as she agrees to accept $40 for providing the service of punching bag... prostitution is about paying for what you want... it just so happens most people want sex.
What do you consider a "nice monitor"? Some 19" LCD with horrible contrast ratio, or an 24" SGI branded CRT going at 180hz? What is your resolution? Too often people complain they have eye strain, then you realize they are trying to look at 1280x1024 on a 17" monitor.
Contrast sensitivity is pretty important. Ask any Vietnam vet. Ask any microbiologist. Ask anyone trying to play Doom 3...
Pretty obvious why this is an anonymous reply.... Palm does not and will not sell BeOS. Adobe does not an WILL not sell Photoshop 4 (official reply "... is no longer supported, therefore is not being sold..."). And "The Learning Company" DOES NOT hold copyright to these works. They bought overstock in bulk and sell them for a pittance IF you can even FIND THEM (Look at their website... "As of December 17, 2008, The Learning Company® products are no longer available via the Web and will only be sold at retailers until further notice.")
Slashdot Mirror
Right parenthesis are hard
Third block should have said: "So all of the billions of successful, well designed websites that [include header.html]HTML Body goes here[include footer.html] are stupid and insecure, just because you say so?"
"Get a clue!"... friggin priceless.
Because Microsoft is trying to push MVC for web development doesn't mean it isn't a good paradigm to adhere to. Your data source should be just that... a source that provides data. Your UI widgets should be just that... blissfully unaware GUI objects. Then you have the "control" mechanism which takes data from the data source and loads the widgets, takes the changes from the widgets and passes them back to the data source.
Also, how in friggin gods name is a server side include a "security risk"? So all of the billions of successful, well designed websites that are stupid and insecure, just because you say so?
I suppose next you ask me what the hell DOM is and what it is good for...
It DOES break the fundamental user model of a web page. Even now. If your content is related as such that one page can't work without another page loaded, then they should all belong to the same page (even if that means using server side includes). If they aren't so twisted up that the pages can work independently, then throwing frames around can cause such headaches as function/class name collisions... that is unless your pages are "aware" of one another. Then you are killing the MVC model.
Either way, don't do it.
(wash hands, stay home when sick, etc.);
Easy for you to say. Regardless the "protection" I have in place via the Family and Medical Leave Act, my boss will make sure I am unemployed if I don't work like a rented mule.
Do NOT give me the "Then get another job" speech. I don't have the income to support the family I have without a job more than a month. I refuse to gamble with the well being of my family. Right or wrong, that is the situation, and I am not even close to the only person in this position.
So... you think Windows is written in .NET or Java?
Or you could take a look at MPEG7
This is the kind of stuff it was designed to do
Yeah. No one cares.
Don't hate! Visual Basic has always been great for creating GUIs. Just there are people who decided to write their code in it too
Sure, but it would likely taste like feet
Well, I could be oversimplifying it, but lets take the following scenario... I sit down at my home in the US, run some scripts, hack a Chinese government computer, brag to my friends, etc... Someone from China's government calls someone here in the US, they track my ass, throw me in a detainment cell for an indefinite period of time for being a "terrorist".
Now, I sit down in my home in China, run some scripts, hack a US government computer, brag to my friends, etc.... Someone from the US government calls... wait a minute, no they didn't. No one even cared. But lets pretend they did care and they called some official in China and told them what was going on... *LAUGHTER AND LOTS OF POINTING* from the Chinese side.
That, sir, is the difference.
You do know that Asia isn't a country, right?
Thing is, once you are compromised, you shouldn't trust that machine again. You detected and removed something, so you know you were vulnerable. How many are there you DIDN'T detect?
Format, reinstall.
'Whether you agree with Sun policing it or not, Java compatibility has served us all very well for over a decade,' Phipps wrote. 'That includes being sure as a developer that all core classes are present on all platforms. Creating subsets of the core classes in the Java platform was forbidden for a really good reason, and it's wanton and irresponsible to casually flaunt the rules.'
You mean like Java ME?
So next time I pick up a hooker, it'll be OK if I beat her on top of screwing her, as long as I give her an extra $40 or so?
Yes, it is OK, so long as she agrees to accept $40 for providing the service of punching bag... prostitution is about paying for what you want... it just so happens most people want sex.
pffffffffffffff
M-x; aabioshock
Everyone should get a saving throw!
the man is concerned about Google being the exclusive source of access to these books
There is nothing from keeping anyone from getting access to these books the same way that Google did...
Its a bloody video player man. It goes without saying that the OUTPUT is GRAPHICAL. Why wouldn't you want to USE a GRAPHICAL user interface to it?
I can almost forgive elitism in some avenues, but this is just making your life more complicated for no good reason.
We'll leave aside the problem that nobody has demonstrated the existence of negative mass
really?
Wait, What?! They can cure my Asperger's?! I DONT WANT THEM TO! I like everything the way it is! LEAVE ME ALONE! AHHHHHHHHHH
Who'er you?!
Don' matter!
Want some rhy?!
'Course ya do!!!
Try a Virtual Boy for only 20 minutes...
What do you consider a "nice monitor"? Some 19" LCD with horrible contrast ratio, or an 24" SGI branded CRT going at 180hz? What is your resolution? Too often people complain they have eye strain, then you realize they are trying to look at 1280x1024 on a 17" monitor.
Contrast sensitivity is pretty important. Ask any Vietnam vet. Ask any microbiologist. Ask anyone trying to play Doom 3...
Pretty obvious why this is an anonymous reply.... Palm does not and will not sell BeOS. Adobe does not an WILL not sell Photoshop 4 (official reply "... is no longer supported, therefore is not being sold ..."). And "The Learning Company" DOES NOT hold copyright to these works. They bought overstock in bulk and sell them for a pittance IF you can even FIND THEM (Look at their website... "As of December 17, 2008, The Learning Company® products are no longer available via the Web and will only be sold at retailers until further notice.")
Your post is meaningless.