This is worse than goatse.cx. Remember, you're on THE INTERNET, so anything goes. Be prepared to have nightmarish recollection of what you will see if you click on this. And remember, you were warned:
Agree, and they're all SQL based anyway. there is stuff on mysql/postgres that doesn't work on mssql. select * from foo limit 10, offset 10 etc. mssql just doesn't have pagination OOTB. that's just one thing that's so stupidly crap about it. pagination is so basic. in most cases the programmer just gets the entire lot back and only processes the required record sets.
Until downloadable music isn't compressed, or they are able to compress without ANY loss, there will still be a need for CD's. I think the under 25 crowd doesn't care that much, you wouldn't notice the difference on an Ipod, but on a nice home system you do. flac is a lossless compression for audio, i think generally you can see a 50meg wav compressing to 15meg of playable flac... generally.
The worst thing would be the UK government bending over. Oh wait. But there would be some good. It would give me an excuse to get some FSM merchandise and parade around Westminster or anywhere else for that matter. If anyone were so stupid that they vote FOR ID in school I'd go nuts.
S: 200 happy to meet you sir C: helo example.com S: 220 happy to meet you C: mail from: S: 220 ok C: rcpt to: S: 220 ok C: data S: 220 begin C: Subject: v1ag7a C: From: customersupport@ebay.com C: To: you@yourdomain.com C: C: message body C: .
You see how the mail from envelope can be manipulated to hold a domain that differs from the message body headers. This is ok for SPF since otherwise it would break email lists.
What it might do is help prevent back scatter spam from hitting your domain if the original recipient's mail server DOES check the SPF for the mail from... that is all.
I thought the responsibility for the material always fell on the owner of the premisses where the data/site is provided from. Have things changed, is there now some responsibility on the 'login' owner to keep things clean?
I must be missing some important detail here: how is a 48-port router any different from, say, a regular router with a 48-port switch ? Do you really need an IRQ for each port ? Don't they use "switch fabric" for those things ? Hypercube-style topology or the like. yes it's possible, no, but it's something i've wanted to do for a long time... i just want to make a single, all contained device that has proper dedicated ports. the switch fabric has a single point of contention, using dedicated ports means the hardware at the card can handle the buffers and all the magic.
Looks like a good book. I've dabbled in embedded systems before. For anyone who has had reflashed their router with DD-WRT or think programming your toaster could be fun, this could be a good read. i've always expected embedded linux to require a lot of kernel experience. i chatted to someone at the linux expo a few years ago, and they were mainly interested in the porting of the kernel to a risc processor. i'm not sure what their end goal was once they could get their risc system to work, but i'm sure it's got a lot of applications.
personally i've wanted to make a huge port router, something like a 48 port beast, but getting that on a system with enough irqs is hard. the best i can get is 8, and that's using epia systems, and not really embedded.
This is all part of a ploy by the global warming alarmists to show how "crazy" hurricanes are behaving and how meteorologists can no longer predict their path with the accuracy they could in the past. To ensure another Katrina doesn't happy, the Imperial Federal Government will establish behavior guidelines to make sure the citizens are acting in a way that is friendly to our environment.
Shortly after that, Freedom and Liberty are brought out back and shot.
</tin foil hat off> that does not appear to be such an outrageous suggestion, very expensive in terms of insurance... and recovery costs.
Best practice or not, it simply will. not. happen. i don't see why not. i'm thinking i might implement this at work next week, we can easily put our public key on the "about us" page as a matter of customer protection against fraud. it's not a big deal to sign all out outgoing mail.
its not something that could have any problems, if antthing, i've noticed the mere signing of email causes outlook to put a nice rosette against the mail, so it can't possibly cause any problems for us.
Slashdot Mirror
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/8765/cortacabea2
"Oh no, someone has set us up the bomb!"
> This is better...
/* only the child spins */
> #include #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
> while (1) {} { fork(); } return 0; }
No, no, that is not better, not at all, none what so ever.
What you meant, I think is:
int i;
while(1) {
i = fork();
if( i == 0 ) {
while(1) {}
}
}
in your loop the parent spins, because it cannot fork(), i never leaves the loop.
men use PostgreSQL,
and _____ use MSSQL.
flame on... =) flaming is ok... but stupid. and even more stupid is people who can code only for one db platform.
Finally, someone being honest. As it's IT related, make sure you tell em what site you get the pr0n from.
I can't wait to put XFCE on it :-)
easy to read http://online.wsj.com/article_email/article_print/ SB118376389957059668.html
Well, google and yahoo are much like Cocacola and Pepsi... MSN is always giong to be the live.com though. Just doesnt taste right... kind of bitter.
printable: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/n ews.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6239334.stm
In soviet Ireland thief finds you! (I nearly wrote that in Russian!)
The worst thing would be the UK government bending over. Oh wait. But there would be some good. It would give me an excuse to get some FSM merchandise and parade around Westminster or anywhere else for that matter. If anyone were so stupid that they vote FOR ID in school I'd go nuts.
Consider the following:
S: 200 happy to meet you sir
C: helo example.com
S: 220 happy to meet you
C: mail from:
S: 220 ok
C: rcpt to:
S: 220 ok
C: data
S: 220 begin
C: Subject: v1ag7a
C: From: customersupport@ebay.com
C: To: you@yourdomain.com
C:
C: message body
C: .
You see how the mail from envelope can be manipulated to hold a domain that differs from the message body headers. This is ok for SPF since otherwise it would break email lists.
What it might do is help prevent back scatter spam from hitting your domain if the original recipient's mail server DOES check the SPF for the mail from... that is all.
I thought the responsibility for the material always fell on the owner of the premisses where the data/site is provided from. Have things changed, is there now some responsibility on the 'login' owner to keep things clean?
was i the only person who read that name as 'Lulz?'
yes it's possible, no, but it's something i've wanted to do for a long time... i just want to make a single, all contained device that has proper dedicated ports. the switch fabric has a single point of contention, using dedicated ports means the hardware at the card can handle the buffers and all the magic.
personally i've wanted to make a huge port router, something like a 48 port beast, but getting that on a system with enough irqs is hard. the best i can get is 8, and that's using epia systems, and not really embedded.
This is all part of a ploy by the global warming alarmists to show how "crazy" hurricanes are behaving and how meteorologists can no longer predict their path with the accuracy they could in the past. To ensure another Katrina doesn't happy, the Imperial Federal Government will establish behavior guidelines to make sure the citizens are acting in a way that is friendly to our environment.
Shortly after that, Freedom and Liberty are brought out back and shot.
</tin foil hat off>
that does not appear to be such an outrageous suggestion, very expensive in terms of insurance
in soviet america fbi find you!!
Best practice or not, it simply will. not. happen. i don't see why not. i'm thinking i might implement this at work next week, we can easily put our public key on the "about us" page as a matter of customer protection against fraud. it's not a big deal to sign all out outgoing mail. its not something that could have any problems, if antthing, i've noticed the mere signing of email causes outlook to put a nice rosette against the mail, so it can't possibly cause any problems for us.